Using complete sentences, explain why you think countries exchange ambassadors and create embassies.
Answers
To establish good, strong relationships with other countries.
Countries exchange ambassadors and create embassies to establish good relations with other nations.
Explanation:
Countries have embassies to establish a strong relationship with other nations to improve trade and other economic reasons.
Embassies are locations in foreign countries where diplomats (ambassadors) are based.Embassies continue their role in mutual diplomacy from the front and inside to improve external relations. As we live in globalization, it has become necessary to have embassies in foreign countries for their role in diplomacy.Therefore we can conclude that countries exchange ambassadors and create embassies to develop economic and political ties with others.
Learn more about "embassies" here:
brainly.com/question/22348699
Related Questions
In the late nineteenth century, the American working classes suffered from the following conditions except
lack of job training programs
• little or no worker's compensation for injury
•
no
government health and safety regulations
O no job security and layoffs due to seasonal, cyclical, or technological factors
Answers
Answer:
little or no workers compensation for injury
convinced thus of his divine right to indian lands, the puritan discovered in the indians themselves evidence of a satanic opposition to the very principle of divinity. In a world in which the divine plan was so clear, in a world through which the Bible would guide all men in all things, in a world in which civilization and the divinely illuminated human reason had to count for everything, the Indian might well be a terrifying anomaly, at best a symbol of what men might become if they lived far from God's word. Yet he also was a man who had to be brought to the civilized responsibilities of Christian Manhood, a wild man to be improved along
Answers
A wild man to be improved along the lines of Puritan ideals. The Puritans believed that they were chosen by God to establish a godly society and spread their religious beliefs.
Religion is a complex and multifaceted human phenomenon that encompasses a wide range of beliefs, practices, rituals, and values. It is a system of faith and worship that seeks to answer fundamental questions about the nature of existence, the purpose of life, and the relationship between humans and the divine or supernatural. Religious beliefs often involve ideas about the creation of the universe, moral principles, and the afterlife.
Religion provides a framework for understanding the world and offers guidance on how to live a meaningful and purposeful life. It can bring communities together, foster a sense of belonging, and provide individuals with a sense of identity and purpose. Religious traditions vary greatly across cultures and regions, including Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, and many others.
To know more about Religious refer here :
brainly.com/question/708787
#SPJ4
to justify american intervention in the venezuela boundary dispute with britain, secretary of state olney invoked the a monroe doctrine. b clayton-bulwer treaty. c gentlemen's agreement. d open door policy. e platt amendment.
Answers
To justify American intervention in the Venezuela boundary dispute with Britain, Secretary of State Olney invoked the Monroe Doctrine. (option a)
The Monroe Doctrine was a foreign policy doctrine introduced by President James Monroe in 1823. It asserted that the United States would not tolerate any further colonization or intervention in the affairs of the Western Hemisphere by European powers.
Olney's application of the Monroe Doctrine to the Venezuela boundary dispute with Britain was based on the belief that the British were violating the doctrine by pursuing territorial claims in South America.
Olney argued that the United States had a duty to protect the sovereignty of the nations in the Western Hemisphere and that British actions in Venezuela threatened the security of the region.
The Monroe Doctrine has been a foundational principle of American foreign policy for nearly two centuries, and it continues to influence U.S. relations with other nations in the Western Hemisphere and beyond.
Learn more about American intervention here:
https://brainly.com/question/1621821
#SPJ11
What do the last two lines of Sonnet 29 mean?
Answers
The last two lines of Sonnet 29 mean the speaker thinks of his loved ones and how lucky he is to be himself.
William Shakespeare was known for his spectacular sonnets, and love is the theme of these 14-line poems of his. Similarly, Sonnet 29 : When in Disgrace with Fortune and Men's Eyes is a sonnet about the overwhelming nature of love. The first few lines are about self-pity and contemplating one's misfortunes, what one does not have, whether wealth or ability. In "Sonnet 29", the speaker is dissatisfied with his living conditions, but finds solace and is grateful for his loved ones. A couplet has two constructive lines, usually in the same bar, connected by rhyme. The sonnet ends with a couplet, which usually reveals the poem's central idea or conclusion. The rhyming scheme that follows throughout the sonnet is ABAB CDCD EBEB FF. This couplet is a rhyming CC, meaning that his last two lines rhyme with each other and the means of these lines is consists the memory of the addressee's "sweet love" makes him feel so rich that he doesn't want to trade places with the most powerful or wealthy man (king) in the world.
To learn more about Sonnet 29 refer:
https://brainly.com/question/12433350
#SPJ4
Which policy of Pope Leo X was most contradictory to Martin Luther’s teachings?
A-The Pope approved the persecution of European Jews.
B-The Pope funded Crusades in Jerusalem.
C- The Pope sold indulgences.
D-The Pope minimized the importance of confession
Answers
No policies listed in the question were as contradictory to Martin Luther’s teachings as the sale of indulgences by the Pope.
The policy of Pope Leo X that was most contradictory to Martin Luther’s teachings was the sale of indulgences.
The correct option is (C)
Indulgences were certificates that were issued by the church and that could be purchased by anyone who wanted to reduce the amount of punishment that they would receive for their sins.
The sale of indulgences was one of the most controversial practices of the Catholic Church during the Renaissance and it was one of the main issues that Luther had with the church.
In 1517, Luther wrote his 95 Theses, which criticized the sale of indulgences and other practices of the church.
This led to the Protestant Reformation and the creation of the Lutheran Church and other Protestant denominations.
No policies listed in the question were as contradictory to Martin Luther’s teachings as the sale of indulgences by the Pope.
Learn more about Martin Luther’s from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/885736
#SPJ11
The policy of Pope Leo X that was most contradictory to Martin Luther’s teachings is The Pope sold indulgences.What are indulgences?Indulgences were a way for the church to absolve sinners of their wrongdoings by reducing the amount of punishment one has to undergo in purgatory.
According to Catholic Church beliefs, purgatory is a temporary place where sinners go after death to cleanse themselves of their sins before going to heaven or hell.What is the counterargument to indulgences?Indulgences were among the key points of contention between Martin Luther and the Catholic Church. Luther disputed the use of indulgences as a tool to gain entry to heaven. According to Luther's beliefs, faith, not indulgences, was the only way to access God. In his Ninety-Five Theses, he criticized the pope for authorizing the sale of indulgences, which he claimed to be a corrupt practice.
Pope Leo X supported the sale of indulgences, which was the policy most opposed to Martin Luther's teachings.He authorized a fundraising drive to finance the building of St. Peter's Basilica, a grand church in Rome, in the early 16th century. To raise funds for the construction, the pope authorized the sale of indulgences, arguing that those who contributed financially to the project would receive an indulgence to reduce their time in purgatory.
to know more about indulgences
https://brainly.com/question/32873311
#SPJ11
how did some apply social darwinism to the native americans
Answers
Answer:
Natives are put into prison treated poorly and they abused the natives it theorizes that all races a mankind are in competition with each other and that only one that fittest race can survive.
With the creation of the cuneiform system, scribes were able to
A)keep records of government.
B)travel to distant lands.
C)irrigate dry farmlands.
D)halt the yearly river floods.
Answers
Answer:
The cuneiform system enabled the people to keep records of government.
Explanation:
A is correct because this ancient writing system was initially used for keeping records of the government, while later it started to have larger scale usage.
B is not correct because writing down symbols don't help anyone in traveling to distant lands.
C is not correct because the irrigation was done through irrigation systems.
D is not correct because the annual floods of the rivers were observed and taken in account in the calenders.
Answer:
The Answer Is A
Explanation:
On Edge 2021
3. Categorizing Copy the
chart below. Use it to
describe the successes and
failures unions experienced
in the early 1900s.
Answers
Successes of Unions in the Early 1900s:
- Improved working conditions: Unions fought for and won better wages, shorter work hours, and safer working conditions for their members.
- Collective bargaining: Unions were successful in negotiating contracts with employers that outlined fair wages, benefits, and working conditions for workers.
- Political influence: Unions were able to gain political power and advocate for workers' rights through lobbying efforts and endorsing political candidates who supported labor laws.
- Increased membership: Unions experienced a surge in membership during the early 1900s, which gave them more bargaining power and allowed them to be more effective in fighting for workers' rights.
Failures of Unions in the Early 1900s:
- Opposition from employers: Many employers were hostile to unions and used various tactics to prevent their workers from joining, such as firing union members or hiring strikebreakers.
- Violence and unrest: Some unions engaged in violent tactics, such as strikes and riots, which led to public backlash and decreased support for the labor movement.
- Racism and discrimination: Many unions were racially segregated and excluded minorities from their membership, which limited their effectiveness in advocating for workers' rights.
- Government repression: The government was often unsympathetic to unions and used its power to suppress union activity, such as by breaking up strikes or arresting union leaders.
Learn more about Successes of Unions
brainly.com/question/11484197
#SPJ11
The Habeas Corpus Act of 1679 contributed to what political development? A. The outbreak of a civil war B. The overthrow of King James I C. The limitation of monarchical power D. The rise to power of William and Mary
Answers
Answer:
C) The limitation of monarchical power
Explanation:
The Habeas Corpus Act strengthened the ancient and powerful writ which had been a feature of English Common Law since before Magna Carta. It served to safeguard individual liberty, preventing unlawful or arbitrary imprisonment. Habeas Corpus is Latin for “you may have the body” – subject to legal examination before a court, or a judge.
The Act contributed to the limitation of monarchical power.
The Habeas Corpus Act 1679 was Act enacted on 27 May of 1679 in England.
Its is important to understand that during this period, England practiced Parliament system of government with a Monarch as the Head of state.The Act provisions required court in England to examine thoroughly the lawfulness of a prisoner's detention and thus preventing any unlawful imprisonment. Thus, the Act prevented the monarchs from having opponents arrested because of power vested in them.In conclusion, the Act was established in line with the England constitution which requires check on power of the Monarch.
Learn more about Habeas Corpus Act 1679 here
brainly.com/question/20726327
did the Canadian railway connect all provinces
Answers
What conclusion can you draw from the attempt by the Netherlands to suppress the Indonesian Republic declared by Sacaro ?
Answers
Netherlands tried to suppress the Indonesian Republic declared by Sacaro so as to control her natural resources.
What are Natural resources?These are the materials which freely exist in nature and are usually drawn from the earth.
Netherland wanted to be in charge of Indonesia natural resources which was why it wanted to suppress it.
Read more about Indonesia here https://brainly.com/question/559076
#SPJ1
over which camel caravans carried fabrics, glass, metal, gems, and spices, extended all the way from Asia Minor to the Pacific Ocean.
Answers
The great trade route was called the Silk Road, over which camel caravans carried fabrics, glass, metal, gems, and spices, extended all the way from Asia Minor to the Pacific Ocean.
The Silk road is neither an actual street nor a single path. The term alternatively refers to a community of routes utilized by investors for extra than 1,500 years, from while the Han dynasty of China opened alternate in a hundred thirty B.C.E. till 1453 C.E., when the Ottoman Empire closed off trade with the West.
The Silk Road extended approximately 6,437 kilometers (four,000 miles) throughout a number of the arena’s maximum formidable landscapes, together with the Gobi wilderness and the Pamir Mountains. With no one government to provide protection, the roads were typically in negative condition.
An abundance of products traveled along the Silk avenue. merchants carried silk from China to Europe, where it dressed royalty and wealthy buyers. different favorite commodities from Asia included jade and other treasured stones, porcelain, tea, and spices.
Learn more about silk road here https://brainly.com/question/1417598
#SPJ4
which of the following cases reinforced the power of the courts? group of answer choices marbury v. madison (1803) dred scott v. sandford (1857) mcculloch v. maryland (1819) plessy v. ferguson (1896)
Answers
Among the cases you listed, Marbury v. Madison (1803) and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) reinforced the power of the courts.
What happened in the casesMarbury v. Madison (1803): This case established the power of judicial review, allowing the Supreme Court to declare laws unconstitutional. In this case, Chief Justice John Marshall asserted the Court's authority to review acts of Congress and determine their constitutionality. This landmark decision solidified the Court's role as a co-equal branch of government and expanded its power to interpret the Constitution.
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): This case further reinforced the power of the courts by establishing the doctrine of implied powers and the supremacy of federal law over state law. The Court ruled that the federal government had the authority to establish a national bank and that Maryland's attempt to tax the bank was unconstitutional. This decision upheld the federal government's ability to exercise powers not explicitly listed in the Constitution and solidified the Court's role in interpreting and enforcing federal law.
Learn more about power of the courts at
https://brainly.com/question/15111973
#SPJ1
Which of the following acts were the MOST responsible for a shift in mindset amongst the American colonists?
Sugar Act
Quartering Act
Stamp Act
Declaratory Act
Townshend Acts
Coercive Acts
Answers
Answer:
The answer should be Townshend acts.
Which of these statements completes the diagram?
Answers
Which nation was part of the Allies
in World War I?
A. Ottoman Empire
B. Austria-Hungary
C. Germany
D. France
Answers
Answer:
France, the other three were in a different alliance together
Answer: D. France
Explanation: France was on the Allied powers and the others were on the Central Powers
What impact did the Ottoman Empire have on Eastern Europe?
Answers
The Ottoman Empire practically had a monopoly on trade between Europe and Asia due to its domination over key trading routes.
What was the Ottoman Empire?Between the 14th and early 20th centuries, the Ottoman Empire, commonly referred to as the Turkish Empire, ruled over a large portion of Southeast Europe, Western Asia, and Northern Africa.
The Turkoman tribe chief Osman I established it around the end of the 13th century in the town of Söüt (present-day Bilecik Province) in northwest Anatolia.
Due to the Ottoman monopoly on commercial routes with the East and their military supremacy both on land and at sea, Spain and Portugal were forced out of the Mediterranean, compelling its merchants and sailors to embark on perilous ocean trips as global explorers.
Due to its dominance over several trade routes, it effectively enjoyed a monopoly on trade between Europe and Asia.
Therefore, the Ottoman Empire practically had a monopoly on trade between Europe and Asia due to its domination over key trading routes.
Know more about the Ottoman Empire here:
https://brainly.com/question/788257
#SPJ4
Where was the first capital of the United States?
Before Washington, DC, what city was the nation’s capital?
Why was the District of Columbia created?
Who designed Washington, DC?
What buildings are housed in the current capital?
What’s a negative aspect of the current capita[
Answers
Answer:
- Philadelphia was the first state of the United States before Washington DC
- DC is unique among American cities because it was established by the Constitution of the United States to serve as the nation's capital
- (Pierre Charles L'Enfant) is the man who designed Washington DC
- U.S Congress (the House of Representatives and the Senate) are buildings housed in the current capital
- The Washington, DC area has lots of traffic congestion and commuting is stressful. Public transportation is limited and underused. (Possible solution: Live near your workplace or work from home) High cost of living and housing.
I hope that's helpful. And Thanks for asking
Answer:
1. New York City
2. Philadelphia
3. It was a compromise that allowed the National Bank to be created.
4. Pierre Charles L’Enfant
5. Congress, the White House and the Smithsonian Museums
6. Lots of poverty
Without the debates between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, what would be missing from the Constitution?
Answers
Answer: D. Written individual rights
Explanation: I got it right on FLVS
The debates between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists were beneficial because, Without a bill of rights, the Constitution would not be able to sufficiently protect the rights of individuals and the states.
Federalists felt that a more powerful central government would strengthen ties between states and contribute to building a "more perfect union," as the Constitution put it. On the other hand, anti-federalists were concerned that a federal government with more authority would be more prone to tyranny.
The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists have four things in common: they both believe in individual rights and liberties; they both fear tyranny; they both want to establish a stable and effective government; and they both want to establish a government that serves the needs of the people.
Learn more about Federalists and Anti-federalists here:
https://brainly.com/question/32211450
#SPJ2
What technology can farmers without internet access in developing countries use to get information?
Answers
How did American settlement in the Oregon Country change starting in the 1840s?
A. Fewer settlers came as the California Gold Rush drew most settlers.
B. As the British established control over the region, fewer Americans came.
C. Missionaries and settlers joined the fur traders who went there in earlier years.
D. Disease and conflict with Native Americans made settlement more difficult.
I need help please
Answers
Describe the system that the U.S has set up to govern itself. Is this system effective? What are the benefits and drawbacks of this system?
Answers
Power is shared between a central government and local governments in a federalism system of government.
What sort of framework is the American government based on?The United States is better described as a constitutional federal republic even if it is frequently referred to as a democracy. The term "constitutional" describes how the United States' government is built on the Constitution, which is the country's supreme law.
What is the functioning of the American government?Legislative—Produces laws (Congress, comprised of the House of Representatives and Senate) Implements laws as an executive (president, vice president, Cabinet, most federal agencies) Judiciary – Judges laws (Supreme Court and other courts)
To know more about system visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/15300932
#SPJ1
What did the royal library at Nineveh contain?
Answers
what did the Dr. Fauci do
Answers
Dr. Fauci has advised seven Presidents on HIV/AIDS and many other domestic and global health issues.
Answer:
His issue is kinda confusing
American citizens regained faith in banks after Congress created the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) during the New Deal. What did the FDIC do?
a) required the federal government to insure personal bank deposits in case that
bank failed
b) authorized the federal government to immediately deposit $1 billion in banks
to guarantee deposits
c) allowed only healthy banks to remain open for the next 5 years
d) gave people the right to withdraw all of their money without a penalty or
waiting period
Question 9 (2 points)
Answers
Answer:
C prob
Explanation:
Prob I think
TS," one of the fastest growing prison gangs found in both U.S. and Mexican prisons, stands for: Answer s: a. Taho Soldiers b.True Soldiers c. Tequila Sunrise d. Texas Syndicat
Answers
Texas Syndicate (option d) is indeed one of the fastest growing prison gangs found in both U.S. and Mexican prisons, and it is known for its involvement in drug trafficking, extortion, and violent crimes.
What was Texas Syndicate ?The Texas Syndicate was founded in the late 1960s by a group of Mexican-American inmates in the Texas prison system, and it has since expanded its reach to other states and countries.
A Texas Syndicate is indeed a street & prison gang with its headquarters primarily in Texas with a membership that is predominately Mexican Americans.
The Texas Syndicate has a stronger relationship or alliance with Mexican immigrant inmates than the Mexican Mob or Nuestra Familia.
A Texas Syndicate is indeed a street and jail gang with its headquarters primarily in Texas with a membership that is predominately Mexican Americans.
To know more about Syndicate visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31098480
#SPJ11
Complete question: TS," one of the fastest growing prison gangs found in both U.S. and Mexican prisons, stands for:
a. Taho Soldiers
b. True Soldiers
c. Tequila Sunrise
d. Texas Syndicate
Texas Syndicate (option d) is indeed one of the fastest growing prison gangs found in both U.S. and Mexican prisons, and it is known for its involvement in drug trafficking, extortion, and violent crimes.
The Texas Syndicate was founded in the late 1960s by a group of Mexican-American inmates in the Texas prison system, and it has since expanded its reach to other states and countries.A Texas Syndicate is indeed a street & prison gang with its headquarters primarily in Texas with a membership that is predominately Mexican Americans.The Texas Syndicate has a stronger relationship or alliance with Mexican immigrant inmates than the Mexican Mob or Nuestra Familia.A Texas Syndicate is indeed a street and jail gang with its headquarters primarily in Texas with a membership that is predominately Mexican Americans.
Learn more about Mexican here:https://brainly.com/question/30969740
#SPJ11
The importance of the eastern roman empire on medieval history, especially in eastern europe
Answers
The eastern Roman Empire, which is also known as the Byzantine Empire, holds an important place in the East European history due to its art, tradition and cultural developments.
What was the Byzantine Empire?Byzantine Empire was one of the most powerful empires in the European history. No other empire during the medieval age lasted as long as the Byzantine Empire.
The capital city of Constantinople was acclaimed as one of the most beautiful cities in the world. The city has been renamed as Istanbul after the end of the empire.
The richness in tradition, artistic features, strong military force and structure of governance gave the empire an important place in the East European history.
Hence, it may be stated that the aforementioned points are the points that led to the importance of the Byzantine Empire in the medieval ages.
Learn more about the Byzantine Empire here:
https://brainly.com/question/18205624
#SPJ4
What reason best explains why McClellan's campaign was unsuccessful, despite his numerical advantage?
He had very little support in Washington.
The South never had to face the full brunt of the Union forces.
He moved too quickly for reinforcements to arrive
Answers
The best explanation of why General McClellan lost the trust of his political superiors in early 1862 is because he was persistent at not wanting to attack Richmond directly. Option (a) is the right answer because the United States' political leaders wanted McClellan to attack Richmond, the Confederate capital, directly, but McClellan was reluctant to do so.
McClellan had been tasked with leading the Army of the Potomac, which was responsible for protecting Washington D.C. from the Confederate army. Despite having a large army of 130,000 men, he did not want to attack Richmond head-on, which was viewed as a lost opportunity. This view was not supported by Abraham Lincoln, who hoped for an early victory over the Confederacy. He also wanted to get the upper hand in the war as soon as possible. McClellan had previously been successful in Virginia, where he led Union forces to defeat Confederates at Rich Mountain and Cheat Mountain.
This led to him being given a command position. Nevertheless, he was deemed too slow by President Lincoln and his political leaders, who felt that he was not moving fast enough to defeat the Confederacy. As a result, Lincoln replaced him with General John Pope, who was considered a better commander. Pope, on the other hand, was quickly defeated by the Confederates at Second Battle of Bull Run. Therefore the correct option is A
The Question was Incomplete, Find the full content below :
Which best explains why General McClellan lost the trust of his political superiors in early 1862?
a. They disliked his persistence at not wanting to attack Richmond directly.
b. The army was 130,000 men strong and had not moved yet.
c. They felt he did not support the war and could be a traitor.
d. He was too aggressive in battle
Know more about Confederate army here:
https://brainly.com/question/32317250
#SPJ8
how did the organization of the pilgrims "together into a civil body politic" influence and later ideas about government in the United State?
Answers
Answer:
The agreement set forth principles of a self-governed body not completely separate from the King of England. The Mayflower Compact continued the idea of law made by and for the people. This idea lies at the heart of democracy and made a significant contribution to the creation of a new democratic nation.
What was the Longoria incident?
Answers
Answer:
1948, an incident occurred in Texas that became a defining symbol of the discrimination that Mexican Americans faced and energized the Mexican American struggle against second-class citizenship.