True. Conscription policies in the first and second world wars did differ significantly.
In the first World War, conscription was introduced in 1916 for all single men aged 18 to 41, and in 1918 this was extended to include married men. However, in the second World War, conscription was introduced much earlier, in 1939, and it applied to all men aged 18 to 41, regardless of their marital status. Additionally, in the second World War, conscription was also extended to include women for the first time, with the introduction of the Women's Land Army and the Auxiliary Territorial Service.
Overall, conscription policies in the second World War were much more extensive and wide-reaching than those in the first World War. This was largely due to the fact that the second World War required a much larger military force, and conscription was seen as a necessary measure to ensure that there were enough soldiers to fight.
To know more about Conscription Policies:
https://brainly.com/question/30554534
#SPJ11
What action would you be required to take if a new mother is screened with a positive toxicology at the time of the delivery of an infant?
The action that would be done is that this infant is going to be taken from the mother when she or he is born.
What is meant by Positive toxicology?This tells us that the mother was found to have consumed certain substances that she was not supposed to during the pregnancy that she was carrying. While pregnant, it is unsafe for a mother to drink or engage in activities such as smoking or the taking of hard drugs.
Some tests are performed to ascertain if someone takes such unsafe substances. The test result is either positive or negative. Positive result means the presence of such substance while negative result means the absent of such substance. If she has a positive toxicology test, it can be decided that she is unfit for the care and the upbringing of the child. Hence this child is going to be taken from her custody.
Read more on toxicology here: https://brainly.com/question/24442473
#SPJ1
What are the main duties of national association for the advancement of secrecy?
Official Secrets Act prohibits the public from having access to confidential information pertaining to the security and integrity of the country.
How does prohibition operate?
Someone would be prohibited from doing something if there was a legislation against the sale of alcohol. to forbid something from being used or done, especially through legal means. It is forbidden for businesses to use trademarks that are confusingly similar to those that are already in use.
This indicates grade level based on how complex the word is. a prohibition in action. regulations governing the manufacturing and promotion of alcoholic beverages aimed to the general public. The act of prohibiting anything, like when my mother disallowed watching television while we were having dinner.
Know more about manufacturing Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14275016
#SPJ1
True/false: only the federal government may restrict emissions from motor vehicles.
The given statement "only the federal government may restrict emissions from motor vehicles." is false as both the federal government and state governments have the authority to restrict emissions from motor vehicles.
Under the Clean Air Act, the federal government establishes national emission standards for motor vehicles through organizations like the Environmental Protection Agency . The entire nation must adhere to these standards. To the extent that they are at least as strict as the federal standards, individual states may also decide to set their own requirements for vehicle emissions.
As a result, states are now able to enact stricter emission regulations to address regional air quality issues or advance environmental objectives. Several states have enacted these regulations, also known as the "California emission standards" and additional states have the option to do the same if they so choose.
Learn more about federal government at:
brainly.com/question/371257
#SPJ4
The law that holds the medical professional not legally liable when rendering first aid in an emergency situation is called_________.
The law that holds the medical professional not legally liable when rendering first aid in an emergency situation is called Good Samaritan laws.
Good Samaritan laws are based on the notion that it is in the interests of "public policy" that those who voluntarily provide care and rescue in an emergency be exempt from liability.
What does good Samaritan mean in law?A good Samaritan is defined by law as someone who helps an injured or ill person in need. A good Samaritan can typically assist a victim who is unconscious or unresponsive on the basis of implied consent.Whenever possible, get the sick or injured person's permission.An appropriate (non-reckless) level of care was provided.The person who was injured was NOT the one who was covered by good samaritan laws.Due to the emergency nature of the situation and the lack of trained assistance, care was being provided.In general, when bystanders observe someone in need of assistance or needing to be protected from harm, they are not legally required to intervene. Only after one person begins to assist another does the Good Samaritan law take effect. Once you have helped,.Good Samaritan laws are based on the notion that it is in the interests of "public policy" that those who voluntarily provide care and rescue in an emergency be exempt from liability.To learn more about : Good Samaritan laws
Ref : https://brainly.com/question/13160856
#SPJ4
The SABC implements a "no
work no pay rule". The CFO takes the decision to withhold payments
to the medical aid, pension fund and housing allowances. Discuss if this conduct amounts to an unfair
labour practice.
Motivate your answer referring to relevant case law and authority.
Answer:
work no pay rule. The CFO takes the decision to withhold payments.
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa
Cite the legal Scope of Practice for both the PN and RN, and explains the differences between both scopes of practice.
The legal Scope of Practice for Practical Nurses (PN) and Registered Nurses (RN) may vary depending on the jurisdiction or country. Generally, the Scope of Practice for PNs involves providing direct patient care under the supervision of an RN or physician. PNs typically perform tasks such as monitoring vital signs, administering medication, wound care, and assisting with activities of daily living. Their scope may also include health assessments and patient education within defined parameters.
On the other hand, the Scope of Practice for RNs is broader and encompasses a wider range of responsibilities. RNs have the authority to assess patients, develop care plans, administer medications, perform complex procedures, coordinate care, and provide patient education. They often have more autonomy and decision-making power in clinical settings. RNs may also be involved in leadership, management, and delegation of tasks to other healthcare professionals.
The key difference between the two scopes of practice lies in the level of autonomy, responsibility, and the complexity of tasks performed. While PNs provide valuable support and care, RNs have a higher level of training and education, allowing them to take on more advanced nursing roles. It's important to note that the specific Scope of Practice for both PNs and RNs is determined by professional regulatory bodies and may vary between different regions or countries.
To know more about Practical Nurses .
https://brainly.com/question/32103938
#SPJ11
Most prisons are organized in a hierarchical model similar to _____.
the military
the academic system
a non-profit business
governmental structure
Answer:
I believe the answer is A.) the military
Answer: the military
Explanation: just did the assignment
Most prisons and institutions are organized in a hierarchical manner that is similar to a military structure.
How does collateral affect the interest rate on a bond
The presence of collateral can affect the interest rate on a bond in the following ways:
1. Collateral can lower the interest rate on a bond: When collateral is provided, the risk associated with the bond decreases. This means that the investor's investment is secured by the collateral in the event that the issuer defaults on the bond. This reduction in risk may lead to a lower interest rate on the bond.
2. Collateral can increase the interest rate on a bond: On the other hand, if the collateral is of low quality, it may not be as valuable in the event of a default. In this case, investors may demand a higher interest rate to compensate for the additional risk associated with the bond.
3. No collateral can increase the interest rate on a bond: When there is no collateral backing a bond, the bond is considered to be unsecured. This means that the investor's investment is not secured by any assets.
As a result, investors may demand a higher interest rate to compensate for the additional risk associated with the bond.
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!! 100 POINTS!!! For this project, you have the opportunity to be the author and write brief newspaper articles based on the torts discussed in this lesson: strict liability, products liability, misrepresentation of a product, and public and private nuisance. In the article you write, include some points about the defenses and remedies available for each tort. This exercise should be at least two to three paragraphs per tort (about 800 words in length total).
Answer:
Manufacturers are used to defending strict product liability actions when plaintiffs claim that their products are defective. But in the opioid litigation, plaintiffs have filed something else: more than 2,500 public nuisance cases so far.
Governmental entities across the country are filing suits alleging that opioid manufacturers deceptively marketed their legal, opioid-based pain medications to understate the medication’s addictive qualities and to overstate its effectiveness in treating pain. In addition, plaintiffs allege that opioid distributors failed to properly monitor how frequently the medication was prescribed and failed to stop filling prescription orders from known “pill mills.” The complaints claim that manufacturer defendants’ deceptive marketing schemes and distributor defendants’ failure to monitor led more people to become addicted to painkillers, which led to people turning to illegal opioids. The legal argument here is that the defendants’ actions in concert interfered with an alleged public right against unwarranted illness and addition. But is public nuisance law likely to be a successful avenue for prosecuting these types of mass tort claims? It has not been in the past.
This is the first of two posts that will address how plaintiffs have historically used public nuisance law to prosecute mass tort claims and how the plaintiffs in the current opioid litigation may fare.
Overview of Public Nuisance Law
In most states, a public nuisance is “an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public.”[1] This definition is often broken down into four elements: (1) the defendant’s affirmative conduct caused (2) an unreasonable interference (3) with a right common to the general public (4) that is abatable.
Courts have interpreted these elements in different ways. For example, courts in Rhode Island and California have disagreed about when a public nuisance is abatable: the Rhode Island Supreme Court held that this element is satisfied only if the defendant had control over what caused the nuisance when the injury occurred, while the a California Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff need not prove this element at all.[2] And while the federal district court in Ohio handling the opioid multidistrict litigation (MDL) has held that the right to be free from unwarranted addiction is a public right,[3] the Supreme Court of Illinois held that the right to be “free from unreasonable jeopardy to health” is a private right and cannot be the basis of a public nuisance claim.[4]
Roots of Public Nuisance Law in Mass Tort Cases
Plaintiffs litigating mass tort cases have turned to public nuisance law over the past decades. In the 1980s and 1990s, plaintiffs unsuccessfully attempted to use it to hold asbestos manufacturers liable.[5] In one case, plaintiffs alleged that defendants created a nuisance by producing an asbestos-laced product that caused major health repercussions for a portion of the population. Plaintiffs argued that North Dakota nuisance law did not require defendants to have the asbestos-laced products within their control when the injury to the consumer occurred. Explicitly rejecting this theory, the Eighth Circuit held that North Dakota nuisance law required the defendant to have control over the product and found that defendant in the case before it did not have control over the asbestos-laced products because when the injury occurred, the products had already been distributed to consumers. The Eighth Circuit warned that broadening nuisance law to encompass these claims “would in effect totally rewrite” tort law, morphing nuisance law into “a monster that would devour in one gulp the entire law of tort.”[6]
Question 2 of 10
Which of the following would be a case brought to civil court?
A. A man has stole money from his place of employment
B. A couple is filing for divorce and needs to determine support
payments
O C. A woman was holding a knife while stealing a bag from a
pedestrian
D. A couple had a burglar break into their home one night
SUBMIT
Answer:
B.A couple is filling for divorce and needs to determine support payments.
4. What does “all levels of government must be on the same page of the book” mean to you?
"All levels of government must be on the same page of the book" in my perspective means that all government entities must have the same level of responsibility. Maintain equality in government officials and level out the power.
Hope this helps. :3
Which reason most closely illustrates why the national government was unable to maintain law and order under the Articles of Confederation? There was no national court system. State approval was needed to pass laws. The nation had two systems of currency. The government was unable to regulate trade.
Answer:
The answer is A just took the quiz
Explanation:
Under the Articles of Confederation, the national government could not enforce laws because There was no national court system.
The Articles of Confederation made the national government quite weak by for instance:
Denying it the power to tax Denying it the power to create a national court systemAs a result of the federal government being unable to create a national court system, they could not try people who violated laws as only the states could and their laws were not universal.
In conclusion, the federal government could not really enforce laws as it lacked the national court system to prosecute people in.
Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/16379544.
Which of the following is true concerning criminal law and tort law
The crime scene investigation team arrives at a car crash scene and finds that both the drivers are taken away in an ambulance and there are no eyewitnesses. The investigation team needs to determine how fast the cars were going. Which action should crime scene investigators take?
A. collect glass samples and perform an analysis
B use UV lamps to get an imprint off the speedometers
C. use forensic lamps to identify body fluids at the scene
D. Collect tiny particles of metal that flew off of the vehicles
Answer:
If I am understanding the question correctly, the answer would be B. Use UV lamps to get an imprint off the speedometers.
Explanation:
I hope this helps and if not, just comment on this post and i will see if I can provide further explanation to help you.
Stephanie was on medication for a cough when she was tested for alcohol levels using the PBT. Though she did not consume much alcohol, what could be the possible reason for a high reading?
A. The device was faulty.
B. She exhaled into the device mouthpiece superficially.
C. The medication contained molecules similar to ethanol.
D. Stephanie’s lungs are infected.
Answer:
It's C.
Explanation:
Edmentum/PLATO
A request for a change of venue is an example of a _______________motion
Answer:
venue
Explanation:
True or False: Drivers on unpaved roads must always yield the right-of-way to drivers on paved roads.
a) True
b) False
The statement ''that drivers on unpaved roads must always yield the right-of-way to drivers on paved roads'' is false. So, the correct choice is option B.
The right-of-way rules are not determined based on the type of road surface. Instead, right-of-way rules prioritize the safety and efficiency of traffic flow in various situations, regardless of whether the road is paved or unpaved.
Right-of-way rules typically consider factors such as traffic signs, traffic signals, intersection configurations, and specific driving scenarios to determine which driver has the right to proceed first. These rules are meant to ensure orderly and safe movement of vehicles on the roads.
While it is true that in some situations, drivers on unpaved roads may be required to yield the right-of-way, it is not an absolute rule that always applies. The specific circumstances and applicable traffic laws or regulations dictate who has the right-of-way in a given situation, regardless of the road surface type.
It is important for all drivers to be familiar with and follow the right-of-way rules applicable in their jurisdiction to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow. Hence, the correct option is B (False).
For more questions on unpaved roads
https://brainly.com/question/31939162
#SPJ8
The brokerage relationship that is presumed to exist is
Answer:
what is that or something
Answer:
Transaction broker
Explanation:
What is the administrative law?
Answer:
Administrative law is the law that governs the administrative actions. ... It governs the executive and ensures that the executive treats the public fairly. Administrative law is a branch of public law. It deals with the relationship of individuals with the government.
Explanation:
Answer:
Administrative law is the law that governs administrative actions. It governs the executive and ensures that the executive treats the public fairly. Administrative law is a branch of public law. It deals with the relationship of individuals with the government.
Explanation:
100% on Edge. 2022
how is the fourth amendment and eight amendment similar
The relationship that the eighth and the fourth amendment have is that they are both amendments that talks about the way that the police have to act with the citizens of the nation.
What is the fourth amendment?This is the term that is used to refer to the amendment of the United States that forbids all forms of unreasonable searches by the police without first getting a warrant from the court of law.
What is the eight amendment?This is the amendment in the nation that forbids all forms of cruel punishments and excessive bail condition on the people by the police form of the United States.
Read more on the amendment here: https://brainly.com/question/687600
#SPJ1
list the steps that the skunk must take to survive in chronological order?
Note that skunks do not completely sleep, skunks enter at times of extreme cold or over the top snowfall a state called torpor.
What are the steps about?Torpor may be a profound sleep that, like hibernation, moderates the digestion system down, brings down the body temperature and breathing and permits the skunk to outlive without being active.
In spite of the fact that skunks do not sleep, they can burrow in their dens during particularly cold spells. This implies you'd see them most some time recently and after long periods of snow cover. Late winter is additionally mating season for skunks and they have their youthful ordinarily in May or June.
Learn more about skunk from
https://brainly.com/question/14268184
#SPJ1
2. Describe a situation in which a government has a great deal of power but does
not have political agthority. Then explain whether you think the rule of law would
likely be respected under such a government.
A situation in which a government has a great deal of power but does not have political authority might be a military dictatorship. In a military dictatorship, the military is in charge of the state and controls the majority of its resources. The military leadership makes all the decisions without input from the citizenry.
Whether or not the rule of law would be respected in such a government is highly dependent on the values of the leadership of the military. If they value the rule of law, they may respect it even though they have a great deal of power. On the other hand, if they value their own power and authority, they may be more likely to sidestep legal protections in favor of their own interests.
In 1980 the Hawaii State Senate held hearings when it was considering a law requiring that motorcyclists wear helmets. Some motorcyclists testified that they had been in crashes in which helmets would not have been helpful. Which important group was not able to testify?
In 1980 the Hawaii State Senate held hearings when it was considering a law requiring that motorcyclists wear helmets. The important group that was not able to testify in this case was the deceased individuals who had died due to head injuries in motorcycle crashes. They were not able to testify about the importance of wearing a helmet while riding a motorcycle.
What is a helmet?A helmet is a protective headgear that is made to protect the head from injuries while engaging in activities such as riding motorcycles, bicycles, or skateboarding. It is crucial to wear a helmet while riding a motorcycle or any other vehicle because helmets provide the necessary head protection during accidents. They have an outer shell that helps in dispersing the force of the impact and an inner lining that absorbs shock.
What are the consequences of not wearing a helmet while riding a motorcycle?There are several consequences of not wearing a helmet while riding a motorcycle. Some of them include:
Head injury: If a motorcyclist is not wearing a helmet, they are more likely to suffer from head injuries during an accident.
Spinal cord injuries: If a motorcyclist suffers from spinal cord injuries, it can cause permanent disabilities or even death.
The loss of quality of life: The loss of quality of life refers to the impact that a head injury or any other injury might have on the individual's life, such as their ability to work, take care of their family, and their daily activities.
learn more about motorcycle crashes
https://brainly.com/question/31553768
#SPJ11
Name at least 3 characteristics of black street gangs
Answer: violent, territorial, and predatory
Explanation: Black gangs have significantly evolved over the last 40 years, and trend analysis indicates that these gangs will continue to grow in both rural and urban areas. As gangs and gang membership increase, gangs will become more violent, territorial, and predatory in response to competition and rivalry.
A defendant must testify at trial if asked to come to the stand.
False
True
Answer:
False i heard it on something i forget but ik its false
Read this passage from the Articles of Confederation:
Article IV. The better to secure and perpetuate mutual
friendship and intercourse among the people of the
different states in this union, the free inhabitants of each
of these states, paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from
Justice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and
immunities of free citizens in the several states.
Which founding principle of the articles is reflected in the passage?
Answer:
Making citizens of the states also citizens of the Union.
Explanation:
Through this passage, and specifically by establishing that all the free inhabitants of the states would enjoy the same rights in the other states in which they were not residents.
Thus, by guaranteeing a unity of rights throughout the territory of the Union, the Articles of Confederation sought to reaffirm the legal unity of all the states, in order to form not only a country with legal security for its inhabitants, but a nation with unified legal criteria at the government level.
Answer:
The founding principle of the Articles of Confederation that is reflected in the passage is A. Making citizens of the states also citizens of the union.
Explanation:
The passage outlines that the free inhabitants of each state, except for certain groups like paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice, would be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several states. This reflects the idea of creating a union of states with shared rights and responsibilities, rather than a loose confederation of independent entities.
what is the legal bac of drinking and driving
Answer:
when you are driving and drinking you may get an accident
3. Is freedom of speech even relevant in a functional society?
Answer:
Honestly No cause ppl will always say something they have no business saying that being said
If we had to watch what we said it’ll be less problems in the world
Explanation:
The petitioner is the party against whom a petition is filed, especially one on appeal.
A.) True
B.) False
Answer: I believe its false
Explanation: