Answers
Judges have discretion in appointing guardian ad litem cases and indigent cases to attorneys. The statement is True.
This discretion gives judges the power to choose who will represent the litigants in these types of cases.
A Guardian ad Litem is an individual who represents the best interests of a child in legal matters, including custody, adoption, and abuse. Indigent cases are those where the defendant or litigant cannot afford an attorney and the court is required to provide representation.
Guardians ad litem are often appointed by judges to help represent children and other individuals in certain legal matters. They can be appointed in a variety of situations, including custody disputes and abuse cases. Guardians ad litem are typically attorneys who specialize in representing children and other vulnerable individuals in legal proceedings.
In indigent cases, judges may appoint attorneys to represent the litigants. These attorneys are often referred to as court-appointed attorneys and are paid by the government for their services. In general, judges will only appoint attorneys in cases where the litigant cannot afford to hire an attorney on their own.
In conclusion, judges have the discretion in appointing guardian ad litem cases and indigent cases to attorneys.
Learn more about attorneys here https://brainly.com/question/17026842
#SPJ11
Related Questions
Based on the excerpt, which statement best describes the author's attitude toward Alexander Graham Bell? The author greatly dislikes Bell for taking credit for the invention of the telephone. The author feels pity for Bell because he is not the real inventor of the telephone. The author celebrates Bell even though he gives him only partial credit for the telephone. The author feels it is important to show that Bell was not the true inventor of the telephone.
Answers
Answer:
The answer is "The author greatly dislikes Bell for taking credit for the invention of the telephone".
Explanation:
Bell decided to create a Rome statute and to test the auditory stimuli if radio waves can turn into symbols. It was assumed, that perhaps the system might enable those deaf to "see" the meaning of a word sound. He is well known to have invented telephone contact, as we know it, revolutionized, that's why the first choice is correct.
Answer:
A
Explanation
All of the Special Agent Entry Programs of the FBI require that an applicant have at least _____.
Answers
Answer:
1) They need to be at least 23 yet under 37
2) A four year minimum degree from an american college/university
3) valid driver’s license
4) must be a US citizen
5) must have completed at least two years of professional work experience, or one year for those that hold a master’s or higher degree.
6) must comply with the FBI Drug Policy and meet the physical fitness standards described below.
7) must be able to be cleared for Top Secret SCI (Secure Compartmentalized Information).
Answer:
A bachelors degree
Explanation:
Because a will is signed and witriessed, courts will not invalidate a wii based on aliegations of undue infuence because the rik as sed imall that it occurred 4. the b taise
Answers
To the question is: False Explanation: According to the law, a will can be invalidated if it is proved that it was made under undue influence.
The fact that a will is signed and witnessed does not guarantee that it is valid. If there are allegations of undue influence, the court will investigate them and determine if they are true. If the court finds that the will was made under undue influence, it will be invalidated, regardless of whether it was signed and witnessed or not.Therefore, the statement that "because a will is signed and witnessed, courts will not invalidate a will based on allegations of undue influence" is false. Courts can invalidate a will if they find evidence that it was made under undue influence, even if it was signed and witnessed. A will can also be invalidated if it is found to be fraudulent, forged, or if the testator lacked the mental capacity to make it.In conclusion, the signing and witnessing of a will do not guarantee its validity. If there are allegations of undue influence, the court will investigate and determine if they are true. If the court finds that the will was made under undue influence, it will be invalidated, even if it was signed and witnessed. Courts can invalidate a will if they find evidence that it was made under undue influence, fraudulent, forged, or if the testator lacked the mental capacity to make it. Therefore, it is essential to make a will while you are still in good health and of sound mind, to avoid any disputes or legal challenges after your death. Additionally, it is important to consult a qualified attorney to ensure that your will is legally valid and reflects your wishes.
To Know More about essential visit:
brainly.com/question/3248441
#SPJ11
in which of the following situations would the president be exercising an informal power over foreign policy?
Answers
Answer:
Signing Statements
Explanation:
This informal power informs Congress and the public of the president's interpretation of laws passed by Congress and signed by the president.
When the president engages into an executive agreement with Mexico about the employment of troops to battle drug cartels, the president would be acting informally in regards to foreign policy.
What do the cartels in Mexico do?Five of the most well-known drug cartels in the world are the Guadalajara Cartel, Sinoloa Cartel, Tijuana Cartel, Juárez Cartel, and Gulf Cartel. They will remain so for a very long time because they have powerful leaders who are supported by an internal criminal network of the world's most ruthless leaders.
What choices may the president make towards other countries?The president may ratify treaties in accordance with the Constitution, but first he or she must submit them to the Senate for a two-thirds vote. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee is an essential component of this approach.
Learn more about foreign policy: https://brainly.com/question/27950081
#SPJ1
what opportunities for involvement in your community appeal to you and why
Answers
Answer:
Environmental protection is the opportunity that appeals to me in the community. The climate change can be considered the main challenge of human beings on earth. Climate change has caused various tragedies from forest fires to catastrophic storms across the USA.
Explanation:
The you people can make a difference in the society.
Community involvement and volunteering are helping to attract and retain employees in a whole new way. In a recent survey, 55% of respondents said that a company’s support for social causes was an important factor in accepting a job offer.
There are several opportunities for involvement in a community that can impact and promote the quality of life of residents, such as promoting sustainability and environmental protection.
You can contribute to sustainability in your community through your personal habits, sharing information and creating events and lectures to raise awareness.
Some simple attitudes and changes in daily habits are already capable of promoting environmental responsibility, such as:
Separation and recycling of household waste.Water economy.Reduced consumption of red meat.Use of ecological transport.Therefore, every individual can help in the development of their community, seek information on what their community's greatest needs are and find out how you are able to help.
Learn more here:
https://brainly.com/question/1051849
Two police cars are chasing a suspected
bank robber. If one police car cuts through
the park, it can get in front of the suspect's
car and trap it between the patrol cars. Determine if this is allowed or no allowed based on “Vehicles prohibited in parks” law, explain why.
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Because i we drive our car in the park it will hit someone
100 POINTS HELP FAST!!!!!!
Incarceration is also known as
A. imprisonment
B. the death penalty
C. parole
D. probation
Answers
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Do you feel like the number of crimes needs to be divided (normalized) by the population of each census tract? Why or why not? (I want you to think which way is more reliable analysis result to see the relative risk of the crime in each census tract) whether the number of crimes needs to be normalized by the population of each census tract or not. Then, explain why or why no
Answers
Number of crime should be divided by the number of inhabitants in each enumeration lot.
Crime predominantly rely upon the two element for example Crime volume and crime percentage. Wrongdoing volume is essentially various wrongdoing occurred in a given year and crime percentage is relativist number that presents wrongdoing on per ca-pita premise.
In this way, rate is the quantity of violations per 100,000 home of populace. Population characteristics like changes in size and density or the demographic and socioeconomic makeup of the population were the primary focus of research on the impact of the population on crime for decades. Therefore, population density plays a significant role in both the rate and volume of crime.
Learn more about Crime volume:
brainly.com/question/30744181
#SPJ4
Which of the following is an example of sentencing someone?
The judge tells a witness that he must repeat what he said.
The judge tells a defendant that he must take an oath to tell the truth.
The judge tells a convicted defendant that she must pay a fine.
The judge tells an attorney that she cannot ask a witness a particular question.
Answers
The other examples listed are not examples of sentencing. The judge telling a witness to repeat what they said is an instruction, the judge telling a defendant to take an oath to tell the truth is an order related to courtroom procedure, and the judge telling an attorney that they cannot ask a particular question is a ruling related to the admissibility of evidence.
Of the five primary objectives of the criminal justice system which is the most effective and which is least effective
Answers
the most effective and least effective objectives of the criminal justice system. The five primary objectives are:1. Retribution 2. Deterrence 3. Rehabilitation 4. Incapacitation 5. Restoration
Most Effective: Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation focuses on addressing the root causes of criminal behavior and providing offenders with the tools and resources needed to reintegrate into society. This approach has proven effective in reducing recidivism rates and fostering positive behavior change in individuals, which ultimately leads to a safer community.
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Assessing the offender's needs
b) Providing targeted interventions, such as counseling or job training
c) Monitoring progress and adjusting support as needed
d) Supporting the offender's reintegration into the community
Least Effective: Retribution
Retribution, which emphasizes punishment and vengeance, may not be as effective in promoting long-term change and reducing criminal activity. It can potentially reinforce negative behaviors and contribute to higher recidivism rates, as it does not address the underlying issues that lead to criminality.
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Determining guilt
b) Assigning punishment based on the severity of the offense
c) Carrying out the punishment, such as imprisonment or fines
d) Offender serves the sentence, but may not have opportunities to change or address root causes of their behavior
To Know more about Rehabilitation visit:
brainly.com/question/9553859
#SPJ11
to which duty of a House member does this quote most likely refer?
A. to propose in draft state laws
B. to hire and manage staff in Washington DC and in the district
C. to meet with constituents in Washington DC in in the district
D. to serve on committees in the house
Answers
The correct answer is C. To meet with constituents in Washington DC and in the district.
Explanation:
In the U.S. government system, the national government level is connected with the local government level including citizens of all states. An example of this is that constituents (individuals who vote) of all states are informed about the actions of national entities such as the House of Representatives and this entity integrates members from different states.
In the quote presented, the House representative Mike Honda refers to the role of House of Representatives to "meet with people who live in our states" who are the constituents and in this way keep them informed about the actions of the national House of Representatives "tell them about what is happening in government". According to this, the duty Honda is referring to is "To meet with constituents in Washington DC an in the district."
Answer:
to meet with constituents in Washington D.C. and in the district
Explanation:
Just did the quiz on Edge 2021
Plz click the Thanks button!
<Jayla>
7. In a divided government, power struggles can occur because
A. one party controls the White House and the other controls Congress.
B. the Congress can override a presidential veto with a three-fourths majority.
C. the Congress creates the national budget and the president approves it.
D. the House of Representatives and the Senate are controlled by different parties.
Answers
list and define the six general categories of crime and give an example of each.
Answers
The six general categories of crime include personal crimes (assault, murder), property crimes (theft, arson), inchoate crimes (attempted robbery, conspiracy), financial crimes (fraud, money laundering), statutory crimes (drug possession, traffic violations), and cybercrimes (hacking, phishing). These categories encompass a wide range of offenses involving harm to individuals, property, financial systems, incomplete crimes, violations of specific laws, and illegal activities conducted through digital means.
The six general categories of crime are:
Personal Crimes: These involve direct harm or threat to an individual. Examples include assault, robbery, murder, or domestic violence.Property Crimes: These crimes target someone's property or belongings. Examples include burglary, theft, arson, or vandalism.Inchoate Crimes: These are incomplete or anticipatory crimes. Examples include attempted robbery, solicitation of a crime, or conspiracy.Financial Crimes: These involve illegal activities related to money or finances. Examples include fraud, money laundering, embezzlement, or identity theft.Statutory Crimes: These are offenses that violate specific laws or statutes. Examples include traffic violations, drug possession, tax evasion, or public intoxication.Cybercrimes: These crimes are committed using computer networks or digital devices. Examples include hacking, phishing, online fraud, or cyberstalking.To know more about cybercrimes refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/32375073
#SPJ11
When is commerical AE considered military munitions?
Answers
Commercial AE are considered military munitions When it is created by or utilised by the military for national security and defence.
What are the definitions of military munitions?
Military munitions include all ammunition products or components under the jurisdiction of the Departments of Defence, the Coast Guard, the Department of Energy, and the National Guard as well as any ammunition produced for or used by the armed forces for purposes of national defence and security. Early cannonballs and "shells," which were comparable weapons intended to be fired from artillery instead of solid cannonballs, were hollow cast-iron balls packed with gunpowder. The term "shell," which derives from the casing, came to be used as a metaphor for the entire munition.
Know more about munitions- brainly.com/question/28342738
#SPJ1
what does the government do to serve the needs of people
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Providing public goods and services: Governments are responsible for providing public goods and services that are essential for the well-being of society as a whole, such as healthcare, education, infrastructure, and public safety.
Regulating the economy: Governments regulate the economy by setting rules and standards for businesses and industries, protecting consumers and workers, and promoting competition and innovation.
Collecting taxes and redistributing income: Governments collect taxes from individuals and businesses to finance public goods and services, as well as to provide social welfare programs and other forms of assistance to those in need.
Protecting individual rights and freedoms: Governments are responsible for protecting the rights and freedoms of their citizens, including civil liberties, human rights, and the rule of law.
Promoting social cohesion and cultural diversity: Governments can play a role in promoting social cohesion and cultural diversity by supporting programs and initiatives that encourage respect for different cultures and promote social inclusion.
Overall, the role of government is to promote the general welfare of its citizens by addressing their needs and concerns in a fair and equitable manner.
The Hospital Corporation of America, founded by the family of Bill Frist (Republican, Tenn.), former U. S. Senate Majority Leader, and the country's largest for profit hospital chain, settled fraud charges with the U. S. Justice Department. Read the article at: https://www.laweekly.com/the-bad-doctor/ (Links to an external site.)
Does the LA Weekly article appear to be biased, or does it seem to accurately report HCA's fraud? Explain your answer.
Answers
The LA Weekly article does not appear to be biased. From the content of the article, it appears to accurately report on HCA's fraud.
The article outlines specific cases in which HCA and its affiliates were accused of fraud, such as overbilling Medicaid and Medicare, billing for unnecessary services, and operating physician practices to overbill government health care programs.
The article also states that HCA agreed to pay a total of $2.5 billion in criminal and civil fines to resolve the fraud charges. The article even provides a quote from the Department of Justice responding to the settlement. These facts all support a conclusion that the LA Weekly article is accurately reporting HCA's fraud.
To know more about HCA , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/18369452
#SPJ4
According to the video, what are some characteristics of Transportation and Logistics work? Check all that apply.
cheerful attitude
negotiation
ability to teach others
physical activity
concentration
ability to handle stress
Answers
Answer:
4,5,6
Explanation i got it right
Answer:
4 5 6 is correct
Explanation:
The Supreme Court has ruled that young peoples First Amendment rights may be limited
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Why might it be difficult to prosecute a citizen who violates its laws outside its borders, when the offence is not illegal in the country he or she is visiting?
Answers
Answer:
Anyone who commits a crime outside their country will be punished according to the local law of the receiving country. This has happened before for other Americans, some of whom made international headlines because of the crimes they were accused of. I think
Explanation:
Please help? ill give 38 points.
Answers
Answer:
The Clean Air Act (CAA) is the comprehensive federal law that regulates air emissions from stationary and mobile sources. Among other things, this law authorizes EPA to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to protect public health and public welfare and to regulate emissions of hazardous air pollutants. One of the goals of the Act was to set and achieve NAAQS in every state by 1975 in order to address the public health and welfare risks posed by certain widespread air pollutants. The setting of these pollutant standards was coupled with directing the states to develop state implementation plans (SIPs), applicable to appropriate industrial sources in the state, in order to achieve these standards. The Act was amended in 1977 and 1990 primarily to set new goals (dates) for achieving attainment of NAAQS since many areas of the country had failed to meet the deadlines. Section 112 of the Clean Air Act addresses emissions of hazardous air pollutants. Prior to 1990, CAA established a risk-based program under which only a few standards were developed. The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments revised Section 112 to first require the issuance of technology-based standards for major sources and certain area sources. "Major sources" are defined as a stationary source or group of stationary sources that emit or have the potential to emit 10 tons per year or more of a hazardous air pollutant or 25 tons per year or more of a combination of hazardous air pollutants. An "area source" is any stationary source that is not a major source. For major sources, Section 112 requires that EPA establish emission standards that require the maximum degree of reduction in emissions of hazardous air pollutants. These emission standards are commonly referred to as "maximum achievable control technology" or "MACT" standards. Eight years after the technology-based MACT standards are issued for a source category, EPA is required to review those standards to determine whether any residual risk exists for that source category and, if necessary, revise the standards to address such risk.
Explanation: im just different
When an inmate is given a reprieve of their sentence, they are permitted to go home for a few days and relax
True or false
Answers
you could also try using the Socratic app
Question: How does Vice President-elect Kamala Harris present a new image of political leadership?
Answers
Hope this helps you!
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Answers
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
How many amendments are there in the bill of rights?.
Answers
Answer:
10
Explanation:
if an agent solicits a client to purchase nonexempt, unregistered securities, which of the following statements is NOT true?
A) The employing broker/dealer must offer the right of rescission within 30 days of discovery.
B) The broker/dealer who employs the agent may be sued.
C) The agent may be subject to civil penalties.
D) The broker/dealer may be sued if the client loses money, but if money is made the client may keep it.
Answers
If an agent solicits a client to purchase nonexempt, unregistered securities, which of the following statements is NOT true is D.
The broker/dealer may be sued if the client loses money, but if money is made the client may keep it. Nonexempt and unregistered securities are those that have not been authorized by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for public sale and therefore cannot be sold in the open market. The only method to sell these securities is through a private placement. The purchaser of an unregistered security is not entitled to all of the protections that a purchaser of a registered security enjoys.
The right of rescission is a legal right of investors to rescind a securities transaction and recover their money. It gives investors a brief time window to reconsider their decision and rescind the transaction. It gives investors the right to return the securities to the issuer, demand a refund of their investment, and rescind the transaction. The investor must contact the issuing company, not the broker-dealer.
The issuer will provide the investor with instructions for returning the securities. The investor will receive their refund once the issuer has confirmed the receipt of the securities and that the securities are unencumbered. The broker/dealer who employs the agent may be sued. The agent may be subject to civil penalties. The employing broker/dealer must offer the right of rescission within 30 days of discovery. If a client loses money, the broker/dealer may be sued. If the client makes money, they may keep it.
Therefore, the correct answer is D.
To know more about purchase, visit:
brainly.com/question/31035675
#SPJ11
What criteria would you use to assess whether a president's first 100 days are successful
Please do atleast 5 sentences
Answers
The criteria for assessing whether a president's first 100 days are successful is that it takes aggressive action to address perceived problems.
The first hundred days are vital for a president's because they could assess whether they not only present what type of leader the president is but also serve as a period in which the president has more space to take aggressive action to address perceived problems. The first 100 days of the presidency often indicate the beginning of a leading politician's term in office. Listening and formulating an informed strategy, gaining key stakeholder buy-in, and then they roll out the strategy in a thoughtful way, so the right audiences are reached at the right time and with the right message.
To know more about the President:
https://brainly.com/question/2409724
#SPJ4
HELPPPP!!!!! :(((
What are the possible sentences in a criminal trial? Check all that apply.
a fine
community service
jail time in all states
jail time in some states
death in all states
death in some states
Answers
Answer:
Community Service
Jail time in some states
Death in some states
Answer:
b,d,f
Explanation:
since french law prohibits the use of children in product endorsements, a company would need to edit any commercials using children if it wanted to air those commercials in france. this demonstrates one of the arguments associated with blank advertising.
Answers
Cross-cultural advertising refers to the practice of adapting advertising messages and materials to be appropriate and effective in different cultures. This can involve taking into account cultural differences in values, beliefs, norms, and behaviors, as well as differences in laws and regulations. In the case you described, French law prohibits the use of children in product endorsements, so a company would need to edit any commercials using children if it wanted to air those commercials in France. This illustrates the need to consider cultural differences in advertising, as what may be acceptable in one culture may not be acceptable in another. Other arguments associated with cross-cultural advertising include the need to understand the local market and target audience, the importance of language and translation, and the potential for cultural misunderstandings or insensitivity
How does the law provide protection and justice for individuals
Answers
Answer:
The relationship between law and justice is unbreakable and there is a direct relationship between the two. It is also highly believed that they are two faces of a coin. And many people consider the proper implementation of laws as a justice. However, all laws are not just laws and entitle rights to all human beings.
Based on the case scenario, explain how Nancy would deal with this ethical dilemma using Egoism, Utilitarianism, Deontology, Relativism, and Virtue Ethics (Principled Stage Suppose that Nancy Collins, a sales representative, is preparing a sales presentation for her firm,
Midwest Hardware, which manufactures nuts and bolts. Nancy hopes to obtain a large sale from
a construction firm that is building a bridge across the Missouri River near St. Louis. The bolts
manufactured by Midwest Hardware have a 3% defect rate, which, although acceptable in the
industry, make them unsuitable for use in certain types of projects, such as those that might be
subject to sudden, severe stress. The new bridge will be located near the New Madrid Fault line,
the source of the United States greatest earthquake in 1811. The epicenter of that earthquake,
which caused extensive damage and altered the flow of the Missouri River, is less than two
hundred miles from the new bridge site. Earthquake experts believe there is a 50% chance that
an earthquake with a magnitude greater than 7.0 on the Richter scale will occur somewhere along
the New Madrid Fault sometime in the next ten years. The bridge is expected to be completed in
three years and bridge construction in the area is not regulated by earthquake codes. If Nancy
wins the sale, she will earn a commission of $25,000 on top of her regular salary. But if she tells
the contractors about the defect rate, Midwest may lose the sale to a competitor whose bolts are
more reliable. Thus, Nancy’s ethical issue is whether to point out to the bridge contractor that in
the event of an earthquake, Midwest bolts could fail, possibly resulting in the collapse of the
bridge and the death of anyone driving across it at the time.
Answers
How Nancy would deal with this ethical dilemma using Egoism,: Egoism: Nancy would focus on her own self-interest and choose to not disclose the defect rate of Midwest's bolts to the bridge contractor.
How Nancy would deal with this ethical dilemma?Egoism: Nancy would focus on her own self-interest and choose to not disclose the defect rate of Midwest's bolts to the bridge contractor. She would prioritize her commission and job security over potential harm that could result from the use of defective bolts.
Utilitarianism: Nancy would consider the overall welfare of all those affected by the bridge's construction and use. She would weigh the potential harm that could result from the use of Midwest's bolts against the benefit of her earning a commission.
Deontology: Nancy would follow her duty to not deceive others or cause harm to them. She would consider it her obligation to disclose the defect rate to the bridge contractor, even if it means losing the sale and her commission.
Relativism: Nancy would consider the cultural and industry norms and practices surrounding the use of bolts with a 3% defect rate. She would weigh this against the risk of an earthquake and potential harm to people.
Virtue Ethics (Principled Stage): Nancy would consider the virtues and character traits that are important to her, such as honesty and responsibility. She would choose to disclose the defect rate to the bridge contractor because it aligns with her personal values and virtues, even if it means losing the sale and commission.
Learn more about ethical dilemma here:https://brainly.com/question/14714337
#SPJ1
#SPJ1