true or false. although it served as an ideology of rebellion in england, puritanism in america became an ideology of control.

Answer:

The correct answer is C. They were never given food.

Slaves in the South were mistreated in many ways, but they were generally not starved or denied food. In fact, slave owners typically provided their slaves with food and other basic necessities as part of their overall investment in their labor. This included not only providing them with meals, but also with clothing, shelter, and medical care when necessary.

The other answer choices (A, B, and D) accurately describe ways in which slaves were mistreated in the South. They were often forced to work long hours with little time for themselves (A), and they were frequently beaten or punished if they did not follow orders (B). Additionally, they were not paid for their labor (D), and all the profits from their work went to their owners. Despite these mistreatments, however, slaves in the South were generally not denied food.

Explanation:

Depending on where you were in the structuralist hierarchy, the experience would be different.

For the most part, everything appears unpleasant from a Western perspective of the twenty-first century.

Fortunately, by the end of the High Middle Ages, Free Market Trade and the shift away from an agrarian economy would help to diminish the hold of feudalism in the West.

Between the ninth and fifteenth centuries, the political and social concept that dominated Western Europe was feudalism (the name originates from the Latin feudum or fief). Labor and land were two important considerations.

There is little question that Medieval civilizations evolved inside a framework that was fundamentally feudalistic and hierarchical, notwithstanding some historians' disagreements over whether it is a helpful paradigm to describe the Middle Ages.

After Charlemagne's enormous Carolingian Empire was decentralized, feudal societies began to develop throughout Western Europe. Lords, vassals, and fiefs were the three main components of traditional feudalistic society.

Land was possessed by a lord or noble, a vassal received land on behalf of the lord in exchange for services rendered to the lord, and the subject land was the fief. The lords may utilize vassals for both military and non-military work after they took an oath of loyalty and homage to them (largely involving agricultural labour and produce). The lord agreed to defend the vassal in return. Manorialism is a common word for the economic system (after the manor – the home of the lord).

Almost all feudal systems provided the lord great power over criminal sentencing, the start of the death penalty, and strict control over agricultural policy, albeit there was no one specific style of feudalism that served as the model for European civilization.

By the year 1500, feudalism had all but vanished from much of Western Europe, but it still retained a firm hold on Russia and Eastern Europe. Serfdom, or the bonding of a peasant to the lord's land, was only abolished by the latter in the 1850s.

Thank you,

Eddie

What is the French government's attitude about changes in the French language occurring as a result of the use of foreign words? They actively encourage this sort of change because it keeps French vital.

The southern states' economies relied upon agriculture and not manufacturing  differentiated the economy in the southern united states from the economy in the northern united states in the nineteenth century .

The primary difference between the economies of the southern and northern United States in the nineteenth century was that the southern states' economies relied heavily on agriculture, while the northern states focused more on manufacturing and industry.

In the South, the climate and fertile soil were ideal for growing cash crops, such as cotton, tobacco, and sugarcane. These crops were labor-intensive and relied on a large workforce, which was supplied by enslaved people. The southern economy was built on this system of plantation agriculture and was less focused on industrial development.

The southern states did not lack the funds or labor resources to industrialize; rather, their economic focus on agriculture and reliance on enslaved labor shaped their development.

Know more about Agriculture here :

brainly.com/question/14533586

#SPJ11

After the seven years' war, British commitment to enforce parliament's policies spurred interest in colonial independence by: attempts to control colonial economic interests.

The Seven Years War was a worldwide battle that lasted from 1756 to 1763 and pitted the United Kingdom and its allies against a coalition of France and her allies. The war grew out of a regional warfare in North America between Great Britain and France known as the French and Indian War.

What motivated the British to engage in the Seven Years War?

Both Britain and France possessed major colonial holdings in India and had been vying for dominance for many years. The British East India Company (EIC) was authorized to raise troops on behalf of the British.

Who commanded the British during the Seven Years War?

However, in 1757, British Prime Minister William Pitt (the elder) realized the possibilities for imperial expansion that would result from a French victory and borrowed significantly to fund a larger war effort.

To know more about Seven year's war visit: https://brainly.com/question/4974889?

#SPJ4

During the Revolutionary War, the Colonies forged an alliance with France against Great Britain, believing that they would benefit militarily from allying with a great nation.

The United States committed to establishing a defensive alliance to aid France if England attacked, according to the terms of the young nation's first military pact.

American diplomats Benjamin Franklin, Silas Deane, and Arthur Lee negotiated for the American colonies in France. Both English and French are used throughout the pact. Both sides agreed that neither France nor the United States would make peace with England until the United States' independence was recognized.

As part of the alliance between "the most Christian King and the United States of North America," neither party could reach an agreement with "the most Christian King" without the explicit consent of the other. France likewise recognized the United States' independence as contingent on military victory.

The pact stated that "the essential and direct End of the present defensive alliance is to safeguard effectually the liberty, Sovereignty, and absolute and unlimited independence of the said United States, both in Government and Commerce."

To learn more about the treaty from 1778,

https://brainly.com/question/15730442

https://brainly.com/question/10957198

Answer:

It's the last one!

Answer:

look at my explanation

Explanation:

As a Populist, also a farmer living in a rural area down South, I would have voted for William Jennings Bryan for the election of 1896. As a farmer and a Populist, I would have been concerned on which candidate running would have been best at getting what we need and wanted. Regarding, the economic things like equal pay in taxes, loans for us, and more money circulating. So for those things, I think Bryan would be the best candidate.

Answer:

In this question, you have to pick out 2 or 3 points that the source tells us about the topic in question.

You then need to comment on what the source misses out.

The first step to answering this question is identifying the relevant points that are mentioned in the source.

hope this helps!!!

Explanation:

Answer:One major reason why ancient Greece was dominated by small city-states and independent towns, rather than by one all-powerful king, is its geography. The country's mountainous terrain, many isolated valleys, and numerous offshore islands encouraged the formation of many local centers of power, rather than one all-powerful capital.

Another key factor influencing the formation of city-states rather than kingdoms was the Mediterranean.

Explanation:

Answer:

On the support of victims of human rights violation, the law should clearly state and express the repercussions of violating human rights. The citizen on the other hand should be well versed with human rights and should report any violator of human rights to the relevant authorities for immediate action to be taken. The community can mobilize and make aware the people of their rights and also allow any victim of human rights violations to face the law and seek justice.

Explanation:

hope this helps

Protections against government action are provided by civil liberties i.e., citizens are guaranteed freedom to follow any religion choose under First Amendment of Bill of Rights. Government cannot impede someone's right to practice religion freely.

To learn more about Civil rights click on the given link:

brainly.com/question/13764349

#SPJ1

Answer:

Benito Mussolini's fascism promoted a love of warfare, nationalism, and expansionism, values which were implemented in Italian foreign policy and helped instigate World War II. ... These expansionist and nationalist motives explain why he invaded Ethiopia in 1935 and ultimately sided with Hitler in his conquest of Europe

Explanation:

The eastern front was further out. Thus, option (C) is correct.

AT a forward position: in the vicinity of something's front (such as a car, airplane, theater, etc.) We alternated between being in the front seat throughout a race or competition. Although the other runners are catching up to her, she is still in the lead.

Between 22 June 1941 and 9 May 1945, the Eastern Front of World War II saw the European Axis countries battle the Soviet Union, Poland, and other Allies in a region of Central, Eastern, Northeastern, and Southeast Europe.

Therefore, Thus, option (C) is correct.

Learn more about the front here:

https://brainly.com/question/1603948

#SPJ1

Absent a federal government, there would be no reason to deduct federal taxes from wages, so workers' paychecks may be larger. Likewise, less overarching and overlapping tax and regulatory burdens could translate into lower prices on store shelves. 

The "Guilt Clause" or "War Guilt Clause" is a clause in the Treaty of Versailles (1919) that required Germany to fully accept responsibility for launching World War I.

In the end, the European Allies imposed strict peace conditions on Germany, requiring it to give up all of its foreign territories and about 10% of its total area. Other significant provisions of the Treaty of Versailles required Germany to hold war crimes trials against Kaiser Wilhelm II and other leaders for their aggression, limited Germany's army and navy, prohibited it from maintaining an air force, and called for the demilitarization and occupation of the Rhineland.

The "war guilt clause," also known as Article 231 of the treaty, required Germany to acknowledge full responsibility for igniting World War I and pay astronomical reparations for Allied war losses.

To know more about treaty of versailles:

https://brainly.com/question/1800157

#SPJ4

Answer:

Strike out

Explanation:

Answer: Archaeological sites in Australia have been dated as early as 65,000 years ago.

Explanation: The Madjedbebe rock shelter in the Northern Territory is currently the oldest known site of human occupation in Australia, with artifacts and remains dating back to this time period.

A general economic slowdown is called the recession. It is the third phrase of the business cycle that indicate the there is the declining in then economy.

Recession is the third phrase of the business cycle, it is also called the contraction. This phrase is coming after the peak condition of the economy.

After the phrase of recession, There is the last phrase called the trough, which is the very bad economic condition that indicated that there is more supply than demand, means there is the excess supply.

Therefore, the recession indicates the economic slowdown, this arises when the consumer realizes their savings.

Learn more about the business cycle, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/4511868

Answer:

First Answer: B. recession

Second Answer: B. bad loans made in the housing market

The growing popularity of newspapers, magazines, and books in the United States during the 19th century contributed to the dissemination of information, the spread of literacy, and the development of a national identity.

The 19th century in the United States witnessed a significant increase in the popularity of newspapers, magazines, and books. This development had several important contributions to society. Firstly, it facilitated the dissemination of information. Newspapers and magazines provided a means for people to stay updated on current events, both locally and nationally. This exchange of information helped to create a more informed citizenry and fostered public discourse.

Secondly, the growing availability of reading material played a vital role in the spread of literacy. As more newspapers, magazines, and books became accessible, more people had the opportunity to learn how to read and write. This literacy boom led to improved educational standards and expanded intellectual horizons for individuals across various social and economic backgrounds.

Furthermore, the proliferation of printed materials also contributed to the development of a national identity. Books and newspapers played a crucial role in shaping public opinion and fostering a sense of community among Americans. Common narratives, shared stories, and discussions on important topics helped to unite people from different regions and backgrounds, creating a sense of shared values and experiences.

In conclusion, the growing popularity of newspapers, magazines, and books during the 19th century in the United States had a profound impact on society. It facilitated the dissemination of information, promoted literacy, and fostered the development of a national identity. These advancements played a significant role in shaping the cultural, intellectual, and social landscape of the United States during that period.

Learn more about literacy here:

https://brainly.com/question/29493795

#SPJ11

Answer:

vvvv

Explanation:

sderftgyhujikolp

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Answer:

C. Europe, Asia and Africa

Explanation:

The founder of the Ottoman Empire widely known as OSMAN I, around 1323 had a dream that three tree branches were extending from his body and stretched to the empire is a big tree whose roots spread through four rivers including the Tigris, the Euphrates, the Nile, and the Danube.

Given that Tigris and Euphrates are in Asia, Danube is in Europe and Nile is in Africa. Hence, the three continents it directed to were ASIA, EUROPE, and AFRICA.

Answer:

B. Battle of Tippecanoe

Explanation:

The Battle of Tippecanoe was an armed conflict of 1811 between the United States of America represented by the forces of the governor of Indiana William Henry Harrison and the native Americans represented by the forces of the confederation of Tecumseh.

1)Daniel Shays was an American soldier, revolutionary, and farmer who lived from August 1747 to September 29,1825. 2) Shays' Rebellion, which took place in Massachusetts between 1786 and 1787, was a popular rebellion against contentious tax and debt collection practices. 3) He fought for the new government.

He was known as terrorist :

1)Shays’ Rebellion is often seen as a response to social and economic hardships, including high taxes and foreclosures.

2) Massachusetts Constitution indicate a constitutional frustration that contributed to the economic concerns of farmers.

3)dissatisfaction with the state government and constitution that can be traced back six years to the Northampton returns on the Massachusetts Constitution.

As an AI language model, I don't have personal views on any topic. However, I can provide information about Senator Rand Paul's speech about the Patriot Act.In May 2015, Senator Rand Paul spoke for more than ten hours on the floor of the United States Senate in opposition to the Patriot Act, which was up for renewal. During his speech, Paul criticized the bulk collection of American citizens' phone records without a warrant and urged Congress to enact reforms to protect Americans' Fourth Amendment rights.Paul said, "If we allow the government to have so much power over us, it's a recipe for disaster. Anybody who has read history will tell you that people's liberties are taken away by their governments."Additionally, he opposed the use of National Security Letters (NSLs) to obtain personal information about Americans, as well as the authorization of the government to conduct warrantless searches and surveillance.Senator Paul's speech was aimed at raising public awareness about the government's surveillance programs and the need for increased oversight and protection of citizens' rights.

For more question like Personal view  visit the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/32132103

#SPJ11

Answer:

It allowed some of its English-speaking colonies to manage their own internal affairs. Which event doubled the size of the United States in the 1800s? What was a main cause of the American Civil War.

Answer:

It allowed some of its English-speaking colonies to manage their own internal affairs.

Explanation:

hope this helps!

(can i get brainliest please)

Answer:

Salvation is often packaged in a way which appears as

A Divine Object that God gives to The Repentant.

Explanation:

The Truth of The Gospel is that we cannot "accidently" lose our salvation as we can lose our wallet or car keys." We can deliberately lose and trash our Salvation by unrepentant sin to the point of hardening our heart to GOD.

Satan knows the above Truth and he knows that if Christians follow this, They will bear fruit of love and peace and kindness and draw many to JESUS... well the devil cannot have this! He wants Christians to be lazy, complacent, full of hypocrisy and self righteousness and darkness.

Thus, Satan, The Father of All Lies, thought of a way to Distort The Gospel to turn Christians more sinful than Sodom and more wicked than Gommorrah. And he came up one of his sweetest of all lies.

Answer:

Explanation:

Professor Cobb's point can be valid if we consider the possibility that even if the document in question is not genuine, it may still reflect certain aspects of today's society concerning black and brown people. While historical authenticity is crucial, it is essential to acknowledge that the document's content might resonate with current social issues faced by marginalized communities. It could highlight enduring systemic biases, racial discrimination, or unequal treatment that persist in various forms. Professor Cobb's argument invites us to critically examine the document's themes and consider their relevance within our contemporary context.

When contemplating why someone would fabricate such a document, several potential purposes come to mind. Firstly, it might serve as a thought-provoking tool, aiming to shed light on historical injustices and their echoes in modern society. By presenting a fictional account rooted in real historical experiences, the intention could be to prompt conversations, foster empathy, and encourage discussions on racial equality. Secondly, the document could be a work of creative expression, seeking to explore the human experience and provoke emotional responses. Lastly, it is possible that someone might create such a document to deceive or manipulate others, exploiting sensitive issues for personal gain or to incite unrest. However, further investigation and analysis would be necessary to determine the true motives behind its creation.

In conclusion, while the authenticity of the document remains uncertain, Professor Cobb raises a valid point by urging us to examine its content in relation to present-day experiences of black and brown communities. Regardless of its origins, the document could provide insights into persistent societal issues, serving as a catalyst for discussions and reflections on racial inequalities. Understanding the purpose behind its creation requires careful examination and consideration of the broader context, encompassing educational, artistic, or potentially manipulative intentions.