Answers
The given statement "administrative law judges in the implementing agencies hear the appeals of people or organizations who are dissatisfied with the way the implementation of a policy affects them" is true because administrative law judges are appointed to hear disputes within implementing agencies and are responsible to resolve disputes between individuals or organizations and the agency.
These disputes may arise when people or organizations are dissatisfied with the way an agency has implemented a policy or regulation and seek to challenge that implementation.
Administrative law judges are responsible for conducting hearings, making findings of fact, applying the relevant law and regulations, and issuing decisions that can either uphold or modify the implementation of the policy in question.
To know more about administrative law judges here:
https://brainly.com/question/14828491
#SPJ4
Related Questions
If you face a violation of your equal rights as a woman in the United States, your lawyer might draw on which of the following to support
your case?
a. Equal Rights Amendment
b. 14th Amendment (Equal Protection Clause)
c. Equal Rights Amendment
d. The 19th Amendment
Answers
If your equal rights as a woman in the United States are violated, then your lawyer would be able to draw upon the b. 14th Amendment (Equal Protection Clause).
What is the Equal Protection Clause ?The United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment's first section contains the Equal Protection Clause.
The well-known slogan "Equal Justice Under Law" is based on the Equal Protection Clause, which has been the subject of much dispute. The Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which assisted in ending racial segregation, was founded on this clause. In addition, the provision served as the foundation for Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex unions and many other rulings that rejected prejudice and intolerance toward members of different groups.
The 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause contains the moral principle that no one should be treated unfairly by the law unless there is a good justification for it.
Therefore, a lawyer representing a woman who has had her equal rights violated, can get support from the Equal Protection Clause.
Find out more on the Equal Protection Clause at https://brainly.com/question/2252772
#SPJ1
Can I sue someone for biting a KitKat like this? If so ill be $100 million dollars richer in a few months.
Answers
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Job is convinced that if he could only have the opportunity to present his case to God, then God would realize he is judging the wrong man, and Job would be proclaimed innocent.
true/false
Answers
The given statement, "Job is convinced that if he could be given opportunity to present his case to God, then God would realize he is judged the wrong man, and Job would be proclaimed innocent," is True.
God believes Job is humble and devout. Satan, however, challenges God, saying that Job is virtuous and moral only because God blessed him with good fortune.
Satan bets God that if Job experiences suffering, his devotion will falter, and he will curse God. However, after a series of disasters strike Job, he still does not curse God. But when he is struck with a horrible skin disease. Three of Job's friends arrive to comfort him, and Job finally questions the injustice done to him.
His friends entice him to challenge God's will. They suggest that his misfortune is probably a result of some sin he committed. Job replies that, 'he is innocent and pleads for a fair hearing from God.'
For more details on the Book of Job, visit: https://brainly.com/question/20379041
#SPJ11
The failure on the part of a police officer to accurately document in a report the reasons why an individual was stopped, questioned without
having been provided information regarding his constitutional rights, and subsequently arrested as a suspect in unnamed criminal activity
would violate which provisions of the Bill of Rights? Select all that apply.
the First Amendment right to free speech
the Sixth Amendment right of an individual to be informed of the charges pending against him or her
the Fifth Amendment right to due process
the Second Amendment right to bear arms
Answers
Answer:
It would be a violation of the person's sixth amendment and fifth amendment rights!
Explanation:
It would not be a violation of their first amendment or their second amendment. Sixth amendment violation because the cop did not inform the person of the accused crimes. Fifth amendment violation because the cop did not provide information to the accused of their constitutional rights.
When is using your headlights required by Virginia law?
Answers
Virginia law states that one should use headlights when driving at night, during poor weather conditions and when using windshield wipers.
Motorists must drive at night with their headlights on. Virginia has not specified an exact time to use the searchlight. Instead, the law requires drivers to use their headlights from sunset to sunrise.
Drivers must use their headlights in bad weather.
By law, whenever rain, smoke, fog, snow, sleet, poor lighting conditions, or other adverse weather conditions reduce visibility and prevent him from clearly seeing people or vehicles on the road at a distance of 500 feet , must use headlights.
Finally, drivers should use their headlights whenever windshield wipers are used as a result of fog, rain, sleet, or snow. However, headlights are not required for intermittent wiper use in drizzle, sleet or snow.
To learn more about ‘headlights’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/4497905
#SPJ4
select all of the positive features of bureaucracy according to max weber. (choose every correct answer.) multiple select question. procedural ambiguity merit-based careers strong personal connections formal rules and procedures specialists for complex tasks impersonality clear hierarchy
Answers
The correct answer is procedural ambiguity, formal rules and procedures, specialists for complex tasks, impersonality, and clear hierarchy.
Max Weber, a German sociologist, viewed bureaucracy as the most rational and efficient form of organization. He identified the following five positive features of bureaucracy:
Procedural Ambiguity: Bureaucracies operate based on clearly defined rules and procedures, reducing room for interpretation and decision-making biases. This can lead to more consistent and fair decision-making.
Formal rules and procedures: Bureaucracies follow standardized procedures, reducing the chances of corruption and personal biases. This ensures that decisions are based on merit and not personal connections.
Specialists for complex tasks: Bureaucracies often have specialized personnel trained to handle complex tasks. This ensures that individuals with the necessary expertise make decisions.
To learn more about Procedural Ambiguity, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/15294467
#SPJ4
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
today, government in the united states is most similar to the ______ because it is a _____. the options for the first one is athenian democracy and roman republic and for the second one its representative democracy and direct democracy
Answers
Today, government in the United States is most similar to the Roman Rebpulic because it is a representative democracy.
The Roman Republic was a system of government in which citizens elected representatives to make decisions on their behalf. Similarly, in the United States, citizens elect representatives to serve in government at the local, state, and federal levels.
These representatives then make decisions and pass laws on behalf of their constituents. This system of representative democracy allows for more efficient and effective decision-making, as it allows a larger population to have their voices heard through their elected representatives.
While the Athenian democracy was also a direct democracy, where citizens themselves made decisions and voted on laws, this form of government is not practiced in the United States today. Instead, the representative democracy of the Roman Republic serves as the closest comparison to the American system of government.
You can read more about representative democracy at https://brainly.in/question/23406546#:
#SPJ11
Taxpayers whose only unearned income consists of qualified dividends and capital gain distributions reported to them on Form 1099-DIV generally compute the amount of tax on their income using:
Answers
The taxpayers whose only unearned income consists of qualified dividends and capital gain distributions reported to them on Form 1099-DIV and generally compute the amount of tax on their income using the W-4 Form.
What is a Tax form?Also known as an Internal Revenue Service tax forms are forms used for taxpayers and tax-exempt organizations to report financial information to the Internal Revenue Service of the United States.
These tax forms are used to report income, calculate taxes to be paid to the federal government and disclose other information as required by the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).
We have more than 800 various forms and schedules. Other tax forms in the United States are filed with state and local governments. The Form 1099-DIV is used by banks and other financial institutions to report dividends and other distributions to taxpayers and to the IRS.
Read more about Tax form
brainly.com/question/25396013
#SPJ1
You are the city manager and the budget is tight. Your options are either to raise taxes and/or fees, cut programs and services, or raise taxes and cut services. Which do you choose? If you are going to cut services, which services do you cut? Once your decision is made, how do you sell your idea to the city council and the residents of your city that this is the best option?
Answers
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
As the city manager and knowing that the budget is tight, I would choose to raise taxes and cut programs. The programs I would choose would be the ones that have less impact in the medium to lower classes. I would establish the priorities of the government that clearly are the creation of jobs and health services. I would sell my idea to the city council and the residents of your city that this is the best option in that I would tell them that these are temporary measures while the economic situation could be transformed in 6 to 12 months. The government would save some money stopping unnecessary expenditure, and there will be some financial incentives to entrepreneurs and businessmen that decide to create new business in the city.
It is possible to amend (or change) a bill in committee or on the floor during debate.
a. True
b. False
Answers
Answer: True
Explanation:
Senators may debate each amendment without limit unless the Senate (1) agrees to a motion ... the text of the bill; a second-degree amendment proposes to change the text of a first-degree The Senate then acts on the committee amendments, after amendment is numbered at the time it is offered and read on the floor.
Suppose a defendant is convicted at trial but believes that the judge made an error that impacted the decision. She would first ask her case be tried again at ________. If she were to lose at that court, she could still try again, if her argument were accepted, at the ________.
Answers
court of appeals; supreme court
The court of appeals determines whether or not the law was applied correctly, typically in cases where one is asked to have their cased tried again for a variety of reasons. In most cases, those who fail again and have their argument accepted will then be brought in front of the supreme court.
I hope this helps! :)
Initially, a defendant's case is at a trial court (Federal, State, Circuit Courts).
Then the case proceeds to the Court of Appeal before finally moving to the Supreme Court of the state or at the federal level.
But it is not true that all cases must move to the Supreme Court when the defendant appeals. The movement to the highest court requires the acceptance of the defendant's argument and the merit of each case.
Thus, the defendant's case can move from a trial court, an appeals court, and then to the supreme court.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/11640159
(There is a photo of a door with blood splatter)
What are 4 pieces of evidence that can be tested at the scene? also please include what departments they can be tested in and how plz!!
Answers
Answer: The blood, the door handle, paint, fingerprints,hair,footprints,dust, and if there is a body then they uslly study the body. They can be tested in the CSI and law inforcment, they are tested by the doctors add chemicals and they study it. they study the blood and test how l how long the blood has been there. and by using a magnifyer to see if they missed anything in the blood like dust or dirt or food they study that
Explanation:
the strategy in which candidates attack their opponents' issue positions or character. is referred to as
Answers
The strategy in which candidates attack their opponents' issue positions or character is commonly referred to as negative campaigning or negative ads.
Negative campaigning involves highlighting the perceived flaws, weaknesses, or negative aspects of the opponent in an attempt to diminish their credibility and gain a competitive advantage.
This strategy often includes pointing out policy differences, past actions, or personal characteristics of the opponent that may sway public opinion in a negative light.
Negative campaigning can take various forms, such as negative advertisements, speeches, debates, or public statements.
The intention is to create doubt or skepticism about the opponent's suitability for the position and convince voters to support the attacking candidate instead.
While negative campaigning is a common political strategy, it can also be seen as a controversial tactic, as it focuses on criticism and may contribute to a more polarized political climate.
The use of negative campaigning varies across different political campaigns, candidates, and countries, with some opting for a more positive and issue-focused approach.
To know more about negative campaigning refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29993020#
#SPJ11
What is precedent according to the legal system?
Answers
Answer:
Precedent, in law, a judgment or decision of a court that is cited in a subsequent dispute as an example or analogy to justify deciding a similar case or point of law in the same manner.
Explanation:
In the lawsuit referred to where a 12 year old girl prone to seizures and taking marijuana as medicine, is suing the Federal Government and the DEA, what can the defendants use to win this case
Answers
Answer:
The options are;
A. Commerce clause
B. The Separation of powers clause
C.The First Amendment
D. The Supremacy clause
The answer is D. The Supremacy clause
Explanation:
In the lawsuit which involved a 12 year old girl prone to seizures and taking marijuana as medicine suing the Federal Government and the DEA, the defendants are the Federal Government and DEA and the only way they can win the case is by applying the Supremacy clause which states that Federal laws are superior to State laws.
Although some states have legalized the use of marijuana, the Federal Government still considers the use of marijuana as illegal.
According to Buddhist master Rinpoche Kalu, which option leads to human suffering? A. poverty B. greed C. compassion D. violence
Answers
A and D
Hope this helps
Answer: B
Explanation:
The theory draws from Tibetan Buddhist master Rinpoche Kalu's principles to determine the causes of human suffering. According to the master, suffering is a result of six emotions: desire, anger, GREED, jealousy, pride, and ignorance.
A store owner charges black customers more than hispanic customers for the very same merchandise. The owner is most clearly engaging in.
Answers
A store owner charges black customers more than Hispanic customers for the very same merchandise. The owner is most clearly engaging in discrimination.
The noun merchandise refers to things that can be offered or sold, just like the merchandise it truly is on the market at your neighborhood record shop or the merchandise offered via sidewalk providers in a large town. whilst you go into a shop, you are surrounded by products, whether or not it is food, apparel, or books.
Merchandise is the term used for any product that you can promote or purchase. Any top for sale is merchandise, a few examples consist of groceries in a grocery store, garments in a retail save, electronics on a website, or uncooked materials in a manufacturing warehouse.
Learn more about merchandise here: https://brainly.com/question/4716509
#SPJ4
21. How often are U.S. Senators elected?
A. every year
B. every two years
C. every four years
D. every six years
E. every eight years
Answers
Answer:
D. every six years I hope this helps you
Answer:
d, every six years
Explanation:
to provide stability I guess
Prinz v US Analyze Prinz v United States (1997), discussing the overarching issue, how the case arose, the Supreme Court's decision, and the rationale for that decision. Please include whether you agree with SCOTUS, and why?
Answers
1) This case arose as a result of Printz's main argument, which was that the federal government could not compel state and local governments to carry out federal policy for the following reasons: The Tenth Amendment for the Constitution strengthens the concept of a limited federal government and protects states from such mandates.
2) In Printz v. United States, the United States Supreme Court decided the case in 1997. The Court agreed with Printz and Mack and declared the mandatory background check provisions unconstitutional. Writing for the case's 5-4 majority. "The federal government might neither issue directives requiring the states to address specific problems, nor command the officers of the states, or those of their political subdivisions, to manage or enforce a federal regulatory scheme," Justice Antonin Scalia concluded. 3) The Printz decision reaffirmed the Court's 1992 decision in New York v. United States, in which the Court invalidated provisions of a federal statute governing nuclear waste policy for violating state sovereignty in violation of the Tenth Amendment.
4) According to the Federalism Five, there are fixed boundaries between federal and state and local powers, and the Court must be willing to define and enforce those boundaries. 5) These and other cases have sparked heated debates among scholars and commentators about the Court's proper role in defining the scope of federal powers.
6) In issuing this wave of federalism decisions and resurrecting doctrines long thought to be buried in a judicial graveyard, the Rehnquist Court has been dubbed a "federalism revolution," though others argue that the Court's decisions in this area are far from revolutionary. 7) In conclusion, the Court's interpretations of the Tenth Amendment and other constitutional federalism provisions suggest that there are legal limits to federal power, and in doing so, the Court appears to have strengthened state and local sovereignty.
Learn more about Printz, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30830002
#SPJ4
10. According to Peel the mission of the police is to:
a) reduce crime and fear of crime
b) investigate and solve crimes
c) keep the peace and maintain order
d) establish law and order through police
e) prevent crime and disorder
Answers
Answer:
Prevent crime and disorder- g00gle
Jill's home was sold in a foreclosure sale. After the mortgage was satisfied and all the fees were paid, there was a $ 6,000 surplus. The $6,000 will go to Jill. T/F
Answers
True. When a property is sold in a foreclosure sale, the proceeds are typically used to satisfy the outstanding mortgage and pay off any associated fees and expenses.
If there is any surplus remaining after these obligations are met, it generally belongs to the homeowner, in this case, Jill.
Foreclosure is a legal process in which a lender takes possession of a property due to the homeowner's failure to make mortgage payments. It is usually a last resort for the lender to recover their investment. Once the property is sold at a foreclosure auction, the proceeds are first used to pay off the outstanding mortgage balance. This ensures that the lender recovers the amount owed to them.
In Jill's case, once the mortgage is satisfied, meaning the remaining balance on the loan has been paid off, and all the fees and expenses related to the foreclosure sale have been settled, any surplus funds are typically returned to the homeowner. The $6,000 surplus mentioned in the statement would therefore go to Jill.
It's important to note that foreclosure laws and procedures can vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and there may be specific rules governing the distribution of surplus funds. However, in many cases, the homeowner is entitled to any surplus remaining after satisfying the mortgage and other obligations.
In summary, it is true that when Jill's home is sold in a foreclosure sale, and after the mortgage is satisfied and all fees are paid, the $6,000 surplus would go to Jill. This is because the surplus represents funds that exceed the amount necessary to satisfy the mortgage and associated expenses, and as the homeowner, Jill is entitled to any remaining funds.
Learn more about mortgage here
https://brainly.com/question/29981765
#SPJ11
perjury is:select one:a.a false statement during a deposition.b.a false statement during negotiations.c.a false statement made to the physician during a patient office visit.d.a false statement made to your attorney.
Answers
Perjury is (a) a false statement during a deposition. Perjury refers to knowingly and willfully providing false information while under oath, typically in a legal setting such as a deposition, trial, or other official proceedings.
Perjury refers to a false statement made under oath in a legal proceeding. This can include lying during a deposition or trial testimony, or submitting false information in a written legal document such as an affidavit or sworn statement. It is a serious crime that can result in fines, imprisonment, and other legal consequences.
Perjury involves deliberately making false statements or concealing important information with the intention of misleading a court or legal proceeding. It can also refer to tampering with evidence, such as altering or destroying documents, or encouraging others to lie or withhold information. Perjury can undermine the integrity of the legal system and prevent justice from being served, which is why it is taken very seriously and can carry severe penalties.
Learn more about Perjury: https://brainly.com/question/30312181
#SPJ11
Which of the following is the best summary of the dispute?
Multiple Choice
A) Gottlieb's standard form contract included a limitation of liability/limitation of consequential damages clause. If that clause is applied, Gottlieb does not owe Alps consequential damages. Alps argues that the clause should not apply.
B) Alps' standard form contract included a limitation of liability/limitation of consequential damages clause. If that clause is applied, Alps does not owe Gottlieb consequential damages. Gottlieb argues that the clause should not apply because it was specifically objected to within a reasonable amount of time.
C) Alps' standard form contract included a limitation of liability/limitation of consequential damages clause. If that clause is applied, Alps does not owe Gottlieb consequential damages. Gottlieb argues that the clause should not apply.
D) Gottlieb's standard form contract included a limitation of liability/limitation of punitive damages clause. If that clause is applied, Gottlieb does not owe Alps punitive damages. Alps argues that the clause should not apply.
Answers
The best summary of the dispute is option B) Alps' standard form contract included a limitation of liability/limitation of consequential damages clause.
If that clause is applied, Alps does not owe Gottlieb consequential damages. Gottlieb argues that the clause should not apply because it was specifically objected to within a reasonable amount of time.
In the dispute, Alps and Gottlieb both have standard form contracts with a limitation liability/limitation of consequential damages clause. According to option B, if this clause is applied, Alps does not owe Gottlieb consequential damages. However, Gottlieb argues that the clause should not apply because they specifically objected to it within a reasonable amount of time. This disagreement over the applicability of the clause forms the crux of the dispute.
To know more about Alps Standard form of Contract visit:
brainly.com/question/33967554
#SPJ11
What are the differences between public law and private law
Answers
Answer:
the difference between public and private law is that private law governs relationships among citizens, and public law governs the relationship between individuals and the state.
Explanation:
Bob Holmes only has one credential listed: Journalist. If he only has a journalist degree, what is he qualified to do in this article? A. Report the details of the topic, B. Give expert analysis, C. Provide commentary, D. Critique the details of this story
Answers
It might be B because I think it is.
What is community policing? How does it differ from traditional policing?
Answers
according to chuck mcrae, former justice on the mississippi supreme court, the power to get a group of lawyers who agree on a pro-business, anti-plaintiff point of view to civil litigation elected as majority of judges on a state supreme court the result is . . .
Answers
According to Chuck McRae, a former justice on the Mississippi Supreme Court, the result of getting a group of lawyers who agree on a pro-business, anti-plaintiff point of view to civil litigation elected as the majority of judges on a state supreme court is the "corporatization" of the judiciary.
However, this doesn't necessarily mean that the judges will always rule in favour of corporations or businesses. It just means that they are more likely to be sympathetic towards businesses and less likely to be sympathetic towards plaintiffs or individual citizens. This can have several implications for civil litigation.
For example, it can result in more dismissals of lawsuits, stricter evidentiary standards, more limits on damages, and a higher likelihood of favourable rulings for businesses. It can also lead to a perception of bias or unfairness in the justice system among the general public, especially among those who have experienced a negative outcome in a lawsuit involving a business or corporation.
For more such questions on the judiciary
https://brainly.com/question/27471151
#SPJ11
HELP ASAP
If you are involved in a collision, what should you do?
A Identify yourself and then leave.
B Call an ambulance and then leave.
C Help the injured, identify yourself, and call for help.
D Identify the injured, help the injured, call a tow truck.
Answers
Answer:
C Help the injured, identify yourself, and call for help.
Explanation:
What is universe law?
Answers
In the fields of law and ethics, the terms "universal law" or "universal principle" refer to ideas of legal legitimacy, whereby the principles and regulations governing human behaviour.
They are most universal in their acceptance, their applicability, their translation, and their philosophical foundation are therefore regarded as the most legitimate. There is a significant universal law that, if followed carefully, can help in resolving problems involving human actions. However, even though this universal law has remained constant over time, partial application without full comprehension has resulted in many failures in dealing with problems involving humanity. The Universal Law of Human Functioning is this law. "HUMAN FUNCTIONALITY IS EQUAL TO ACQUIRED KNOWLEDGE AND THE APPLICATION OF THE ACQUIRED KNOWLEDGE, IF OTHER CONDITIONS REMAIN CONSTANT" states the universal law of human functionality.
Learn more about functionality here:
https://brainly.com/question/30553767
#SPJ4
Under the provisions of the Taft-Hartley Act, the president can ask for a(n) ___________ to prevent a strike in a critical industry.
Selected Answer:
temporary take over by the federal government
Response Feedback:
incorrectcooling off
Answers
The Taft-Hartley Act allows the President to appoint a board to investigate union disputes if he deems that a strike would endanger national health or safety.
Taft-Hartley Act's goal was to establish a more balanced relationship between labour and management. The Taft-Hartley Act was intended to defuse the growing momentum of the organised labour movement. According to its terms, the President may issue an executive order requiring the reopening of any union-shuttered workplace, with criminal penalties applied to those who refuse. The act specified that in order to unionise a workplace, a majority of employees must vote in favour of doing so. The Taft-Hartley Act also restricted employers' responsibility when on-site supervisors and workplace managers violate workers' legal rights. This provision provides that if a management official participates in conduct that may be construed as harassment of union members for purposes other than the performance of his or her real work duties, the employer shall not be subject to criminal or civil liability.
Learn more about penalties here:
https://brainly.com/question/30029167
#SPJ4