True or False? according to mr. cochran you may resort to civil disobedience if your cause is just, it affects most people, you have tried to work through the system, you are willing to pay the fine and/or go to jail, and you remain non-violent.

Answer:

best answer ever

Explanation:

So, if I am Prime minister of ..... l,  I may do the following things, and again, just because a PM says or does something doesn’t mean it happens automatically, you have to deal with individual ministries and civil servants, media, the opposition party, judiciary, and others, It’s not a dictatorship where things get done just by speaking. Anyway, here are a few things.

Rule of law: Yes, that’s my priority to ensure that Constitution and laws are applied to everybody, rich and poor, politically connected, and others. This will be very difficult in the case of a coalition Govt but it can be done in a majority Govt with strong will and good ministers in various places. What can be done?? Well, we can first start by prosecuting previous cases of violation of rule of law by powerful politicians and others, media can help in that. Giving resources to public prosecutors and hiring good people so that accused are punished. Increasing punishment for things like corruption (It’s just 2 years in Nepal for big corruption) can also help. it must be assured that nobody is above the law and that way, their faith in Govt and democracy will be restored a bit.

Expedite construction projects: We have too many problems in Nepal with slow approval process or red tape regulation and also with procurement and contractors, among others which delays vital projects like building roads, airports, bridges, pipelines for water among others and even if they are built, it’s of less quality because a lot of money is being wasted on commission and there is corruption. I will create a task force of expert people from all relevant backgrounds to suggest ways to expedite construction projects including Hydropower projects, try to find out root problems and how to address them, see if the problems are politicians bureaucrats or private sector, and give me ways. A PM cannot know everything and we need to rely on experts for a solution. One of the biggest problems in Nepal is that politicians here including PM believe only they are real experts and don’t need help from anybody. We need to change that approach.

Electricity generation: This is a must for economic development in Nepal because without electricity there can be no industrialization. As everyone knows, Nepal has a huge potential in hydroelectricity which is renewable but big projects have been delayed for a long time. We need to expedite such big projects but also help the private sector build small hydropower projects in small communities to make them itself-sufficientient. Nepal’s total hydropower generation many says is around 80,000 MW (I am not sure, need to look at that as well) and many in Nepal say, we must build hydropower projects to then immediately sell to India. I think, first, we should make Nepal self-sufficient and then only think about other Countries. Electricity can be used not just for regular stuff but also for industries, we can give thousands of MW to industries in Nepal that will employ millions of good-paying jobs in Nepal, we can use electricity to make Nepal a leader in electric vehicles, and using renewables. We import billions of petroleum from India, if we can only try to reduce it by using electric vehicles, esp in Kathmandu, it will make a difference. Again, these are long-term projects and only a PM cannot do anything, huge amount of cooperation is needed on all sides, from Nepali people to the private sector. Nepal govt can always give incentives like custom-free electric vehicles that are cheap to tax credits for companies among others.

In the professional area, these are a few role conflicts that exist:

Job conflict happens when employees are given multiple, incompatible roles at once or when their role overlaps with that of another employee or workgroup. A worker is more likely to experience stress at work if there is more role conflict.

A role conflict typically arises when someone is pulled in several different ways as they attempt to respond to the numerous statuses they have. The most frequent role conflict is between a person's commitments at work and at home, or between professional and personal responsibilities.

Learn more about role conflict, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13603130

#SPJ1

Answer:

To enter into a binding contract, you have to be show that the presentation for the contract is made in a well label manner

The one that could be one of the negative ramifications of violating RESPA is option A. the penalty can be steep

The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) is a federal law that was enacted to protect consumers in the home buying and mortgage process. It requires lenders, mortgage brokers, and servicers to provide disclosures to borrowers about the terms and costs of their home loans, and it prohibits certain practices that can lead to higher costs or fees for borrowers.

Some examples of practices that could potentially violate RESPA include:

If a mortgage lender involved in a RESPA violation, the penalty can be steep. For providing or accepting kickbacks or referral fees, the penalties are up to $10,000 in fines and up to one year in jail.

Therefore, It is the negative ramifications of violating RESPA because of the penalty that follows it which can be steep.

learn more about RESPA: https://brainly.com/question/26066905

#SPJ1

The complete question goes thus:

which of the following could be one of the negative ramifications of violating respa?

A. the penalty can be steep

B. freeway of handling issues

C. None of the above

D. All of the above

The U.S. Congress consists of two chambers, the House and the Senate, whereas the British Parliament is a single body.

1. The U.S. Congress: The United States Congress is composed of two separate chambers - the House of Representatives and the Senate. This bicameral structure ensures checks and balances within the legislative branch of the U.S. government.

The House of Representatives is based on the population of each state, with each state having a varying number of representatives. The Senate, on the other hand, consists of two senators from each state, regardless of the state's population size.

2. The British Parliament: The British Parliament, also known as the Westminster Parliament, operates as a unicameral body. It comprises the House of Commons and the House of Lords.

The House of Commons is elected by the public, while the House of Lords is composed of appointed members, including life peers, bishops, and hereditary peers.

3. Taxation Matters: While the U.S. Congress has the authority to address all aspects of legislation, the British Parliament primarily deals with matters of legislation, including taxation. Tax-related decisions, such as introducing or amending taxes, fall under the jurisdiction of the Parliament.

4. Government Ministers and Parliament: In the British system, government ministers can simultaneously hold office and be members of the Parliament. This allows ministers to actively participate in legislative debates and decision-making processes. In contrast, members of the U.S. Congress cannot hold cabinet positions in the executive branch simultaneously.

5. Judicial Authority: The British courts do not possess the power to declare acts of Parliament unconstitutional or against the constitution. The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty in the United Kingdom affirms that Parliament is the supreme legal authority, and its acts cannot be overturned by the judiciary based on constitutionality alone.

In summary, while both the U.S. Congress and the British Parliament are legislative bodies, they differ in their structure, taxation matters, the involvement of government ministers, and the judicial authority to declare acts of Parliament unconstitutional.

For more such questions on British Parliament, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/30792867

#SPJ8

Answer:

hard hand

Explanation:

Answer:

The era of Roman Emperor Justinian I (529-534) was significant for the concept of laws throughout history because of the creation of the Code of Justinian. The Code of Justinian was a collection of laws that were compiled and revised during Justinian's reign[1]. The Code was a comprehensive set of laws that covered all aspects of Roman life, including civil law, criminal law, and commercial law. It was considered a significant achievement because it brought together all the laws of the Roman Empire into one unified code[2]. Justinian considered it his divine duty to restore the Roman Empire to its ancient boundaries and wanted to reform the government and legal system, which had long suffered from corruption and outdated laws[3][4].

Answer:

By mutual understanding and cooperation.

Explanation:

Ethical dilemmas are evaluated by the individual when they work for their own interest and affect the other individual. For example, by taking the credit of other's work. In this example, one individual takes the advantage of the situation which is totally unethical. Such type of ethical dilemmas are resolved by the mutual understanding and cooperation of the two parties. Factors that are involved in creating ethical dilemmas are achieving personal goals and make advantage of a situation for your own profit and interest.

Drug prosecutions account for approximately 30% of all federal criminal cases.Drug prosecution can be defined as the process of holding an individual responsible for criminal actions related to drugs. The use, possession, and trafficking of drugs are among the most common drug-related offenses.

Some of the common drug-related crimes that lead to drug prosecutions include drug possession, drug trafficking, and drug distribution. The types of drug prosecutions include: Federal drug prosecutions, State drug prosecutions,County and municipal drug prosecutions. According to data provided by the United States Sentencing Commission, drug offenses are the most commonly prosecuted crimes in the United States. In fact, approximately half of all federal prisoners are incarcerated for drug offenses, which highlights the importance of drug prosecution in the criminal justice system.

To know more about Drug visit-

brainly.com/question/32068715

#SPJ11

The liability on the balance sheet should be classified as the long-term liability.

Long-term liability, which is also called as the long-term debts, are debts which a company owes to the third-party creditors which are payable beyond 12 months. So, this tends to distinguish them from current liabilities, which a company must pay within 12 months.

On the balance sheet, the long-term liabilities tend to appear along with the current liabilities. Long-term liabilities thus include loans and notes or bonds payable. Whereas, liabilities such as bonds issued by a company are usually reported at an amortised cost on the balance sheet.

Hence, option B is correct.

To learn more about the balance sheet here:

https://brainly.com/question/26323001

#SPJ1

Answer:

Never give up on the grind

After an arrest has been made, the suspect is brought to the police station to be booked (Option A).

Booking is a formal process during which the police record the suspect's personal information, the details of the alleged crime, and collect fingerprints and photographs. This procedure helps to establish the suspect's identity and creates an official record of the arrest.
Interrogation (Option B) may also occur at the police station, but it is not the primary reason for bringing the suspect there. Interrogation involves questioning the suspect about the crime they are accused of committing. It is important to note that suspects have the right to remain silent and consult with an attorney during interrogations.
Sentencing (Option C) takes place after a suspect has been found guilty of a crime, either through a trial or by entering a plea agreement. This occurs in a court of law, not at the police station, and is overseen by a judge.
Releasing (Option D) a suspect is a possible outcome after the booking process, depending on the nature of the crime and the suspect's criminal history. In some cases, a suspect may be released on bail or on their own recognizance while awaiting trial. However, release is not the primary purpose of bringing the suspect to the police station after an arrest.
In summary, after an arrest, the suspect is primarily brought to the police station for booking (Option A). Other actions such as interrogation, sentencing, or release may occur at different stages of the legal process.

Learn more about law :

https://brainly.com/question/29553358

#SPJ11

The given statement " the Constitution does not explicitly mention the word "privacy." However, the Supreme Court has interpreted that the concept of privacy is protected by the Bill of Rights". is True because  This protection stems from various amendments within the Bill of Rights, such as the First, Third, Fourth, and Ninth Amendments.

For example, the First Amendment protects freedom of speech, religion, and association, which contribute to an individual's sense of privacy in their thoughts, beliefs, and affiliations. The Third Amendment prevents the forced quartering of soldiers in private homes, preserving personal space and privacy. The Fourth Amendment guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, ensuring a person's right to privacy within their possessions and property.

The Ninth Amendment, which states that the enumeration of certain rights in the Constitution does not deny or disparage other rights retained by the people, has also been used to support the notion of a protected right to privacy. This amendment implies that there may be unenumerated rights, such as privacy, that exist and should be protected.

In landmark cases like Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) and Roe v. Wade (1973), the Supreme Court has affirmed the existence of a constitutional right to privacy, even though the word itself is not explicitly mentioned. These rulings have established privacy as a fundamental right, protected under the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Know more about Bill of Rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/28828470

#SPJ11

Answer:

Law enforcement

courts

corrections

(i think its the 2nd one)

The best reason that supports the conclusion of the courts in Leichtman v. WLW Jacor Communications, Inc. that smoke can be offensive contact under battery was based on two main factors intent and offensiveness.

Leichtman v. WLW Jacor Communications, Inc. is a court case that took place in Ohio in 1996.

The case involved a woman, Leichtman, who was exposed to secondhand smoke while working at a radio station owned by WLW Jacor Communications. Leichtman suffered from asthma and claimed that the smoke aggravated her condition, causing her physical harm.

She sued the radio station for battery, among other claims. In this case, the court found that the smoke could be considered offensive contact under the tort of battery. The court based its decision on:

1. The intent to cause harmful or offensive contact. The court determined that the radio station knew or should have known that the smoke would cause harm or offense to Leichtman.

2. The court found that the smoke was highly offensive or objectionable to a reasonable person in Leichtman's position. The court determined that the smoke interfered with Leichtman's use and enjoyment of her workplace and was a substantial and unreasonable interference with her personal space.

Based on these factors, the court concluded that the smoke could be considered offensive contact under battery. This decision was significant because it recognized that secondhand smoke could be considered a form of harmful or offensive contact in certain circumstances, even if there was no physical contact between the parties.

To know more about battery here:

https://brainly.com/question/29773699

#SPJ4

Answer:

Redeemers

Bourbons

Explanation:

The Southern branch of the Party Establishment was the Redeemers. They were seeking to reclaim their political influence and to implement white nationalism.

Answer:

this is an example:

Brenda Ames

November 8, 2017

Mr. Matthew Richards

HR Manager

City of Some town

5 City Hall Ave.

Some town, CO 55555

Dear Mr. Richards:

I was interested to read City of Sometown’s posting on Monster for an entry-level police officer. For as long as I can remember I’ve wanted to pursue a career in law enforcement, and the opportunity to serve and protect within my hometown community is my dream job.

Here’s why I am a strong candidate for this position:

Training & Credentials: After graduating top of my class to earn my Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) certification, I pursued an AAS in law enforcement from XYZ Community College. Last month I earned my degree with honors, along with CPR and first aid certifications. As a result of this training, I offer a solid foundation in police fundamentals.

Community-Minded: As a native of Some town, I am deeply committed to the welfare of the community. After graduating from Some town High School, I stayed active in my local church and Kiwanis Club. These close community ties will assist in fostering positive relationships and furthering police-community goodwill.

Sincerely,

Brenda Ames

The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that excludes evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment from being used against a defendant in a criminal trial. While the exclusionary rule is primarily associated with the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, its application can also reinforce the principles of the Fifth Amendment.

The Fifth Amendment protects individuals against self-incrimination and ensures due process of law. The exclusionary rule reinforces these principles by discouraging law enforcement from engaging in unconstitutional or illegal practices, such as conducting warrantless searches or obtaining evidence through coercion or violations of procedural rights. By suppressing evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the exclusionary rule discourages law enforcement from infringing upon an individual's constitutional rights and ensures that defendants are not compelled to incriminate themselves. Furthermore, the exclusionary rule acts as a safeguard to maintain the integrity of the criminal justice system. It sends a message that evidence obtained through unlawful means will not be admissible in court, discouraging law enforcement misconduct and protecting the rights of the accused. This reinforces the principle that defendants are entitled to a fair trial and that the state must respect their constitutional rights.

To know more about the exclusionary rule and its relationship with the Fifth Amendment, click here: brainly.com/question/9354042

#SPJ11

The number one mistake officers make in processing fingerprints with powders is applying too much powder.

Excessive powder can lead to smudging and obscuring the fingerprint, making it more difficult to obtain a clear and usable print.

It is crucial for officers to apply a thin and even layer of powder, ensuring that it adheres to the moisture in the fingerprint ridges while minimizing excess powder on the surrounding areas. By using the right amount of powder and employing proper techniques, officers can enhance the visibility of fingerprints and increase the chances of successful identification and analysis in forensic investigations.

To learn more about forensic investigation, refer

brainly.com/question/14603762

#SPJ11

False, the federal reserve do not operates under a rule that requires money supply growth to increase by one percentage point for every percentage point that unemployment rises above its natural rate.

To learn more about federal reserve from the given link :

https://brainly.com/question/23247429

#SPJ4

Answer: prison riots and increased interpersonal violence

Explanation:

With prisoners having more freedom in prisons, they regularly came into contact with other prisoners. As the prisons became overcrowded, contact with other prisoners increased and so did tensions.

These tensions boiled over into interpersonal violence and conflict which escalated sometimes into full blown riots such as the Attica Prison riot of 1971 and the Ohio State Penitentiary riot in 1968.

The Supreme Court has interpreted the 14th Amendment in decisions that have influenced civil rights and freedoms in America for 150 years.

The Supreme Court has ruled that it is unlawful to restrict someone's ability to exercise their right to vote, serve on a jury, own property, criticize the government,

engage in a variety of occupations, and remain in the United States on the basis of their race, religion, gender, or other protected characteristics.

The amendment was developed to address the racial injustice that Black people who had just been set free from slavery experienced.

It confirmed citizenship rights and benefits and, for the first time, ensured that all Americans would get equal protection under the law.

The struggle for racial equality and numerous other social justice movements continue to revolve around the 14th Amendment.

To make sure that its protections are comprehensive, much work still needs to be done.

To know more about Rights, Click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28685310

#SPJ4

The South African Constitution has a Bill of Rights that protects all people. This means that people living with HIV/AIDS have the same rights as any other person. No employer can require that a job applicant have an HIV test before they are employed.Nov 8, 2

The three ways  South African laws ensure that people living with HIV/AIDS are not discriminated against are as follows:

The HIV/AIDS Act of South Africa provides for:

Thus, South African law has always taken special care of those living with HIV/AIDS.

Learn more about HIV/AIDS in South Africa at https://brainly.com/question/5181745

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

because it record everything

Answer:

neither unless Jhon excepted the bid. and the answere is we do not have a contract, and if they sue then counter sue them and defende yourself with a lawyer/ lawyers

In a contract under common law, all of the following must be included: the offer, the type of the work, the price, the quantity, and the performance. In a contract under the UCC, just the quantity must be specified.

In general, the UCC offers what the common law does: if the parties have a written document that is meant to be their final agreement, it "may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement." The "course of dealing or usage of trade" may, however, provide an explanation. When someone visits a grocery store to buy their groceries, they enter into an agreement with the store to pay money in exchange for food and drink.

Read more about common law at

https://brainly.com/question/31657506

#SPJ4