Trap, neuter, release programs are growing in popularity across the country.
Decide whether each statement is a positive or negative of implementing a trap, neuter, release program.
1. There is no way to determine how many animals will be spayed or neutered.
2. The costs are relatively low and are often paid for by individuals or grants.
3. If successful, strays will not be able to reproduce, which would result in fewer strays in the future.
4. It might be hard to find individuals willing to volunteer to capture stray pets.
Answers
Answer:
2.
HOPE THIS HELPS ALSO MARK AS BRAINLIEST
Answer:
1, negative, 2 positive, 3 positive, 4 negative
Related Questions
Do I go to jail if I hit a car and run
Answers
Answer:
You could face a lot of charges for the car and damage but you go to jail.
Explanation:
DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND SUPREME COURT OF APEAL
Answers
Answer:
The difference is that the supreme court determines if the law is final and binding, while the constitutional court only deals with constitutional laws.
Explanation:
The constitutional court is established by the constitution.
The supreme court interprets the laws and decides whether a law is relevant or how it should be applied.
The Supreme Court of Appeal, on the other hand, is responsible for hearing appeals from lower courts and ensuring that the law is applied correctly. It is the highest court in the country for non-constitutional matters and has the power to review and change decisions made by lower courts.
what does the domestic ammendment act mean and do?
Answers
Answer:
Prevent gaps in protection.
Explanation:
An interim protection order (IPO) protects survivors during police investigations, while a protection order (PO) protects survivors during criminal court proceedings.
A police office is legally allowed to shoot a criminal suspect if he or she attempts to escape during an arrest.
True
False
Answers
Answer:
Flase
Explanation:
Which weakness of the Articles of Confederation was corrected by the authors of the Constitution?
o no relations with foreign nations
no national court system
no elected representatives
ono state governments
Answers
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:
I took the test LOL
Research CA state measure (Proposition) 18,22,25, Pick one. Write 3 sentences minimum about how and why you would vote for this one Measure if you could vote.
Plzzzzzz help!!!
Answers
Answer:
Proposition 18: The allowance of 17 year olds to vote in primary elections if they will be 18 by the time of the general election.
Explanation:
I would vote yes for proposition 18 to amend the California constitution to allow 17 year olds the right to vote in the Primary election if the person will be 18 years old by the time of the General election. Many states have adopted this amendment and allow 17 year olds to vote if they meet this standard. This would allow 17 year olds to choose who they can vote for on their general election ballot. I believe it is fair to allow them to vote as they should have a voice in their candidates for the general election.
Conclusion
Final persuasion: Restate the issue, why it is important to advocate for this change, affordable housing how your campaign will help find a resolution. Topic affordable housing?
Answers
Final persuasion: Restate the issue, why it is important to advocate for this change, affordable housing how your campaign will help find a resolution. Yes, the Topic is affordable housing.
What is affordable housing?
As determined by the federal government or a local government using a recognised housing affordability index, affordable housing is defined as housing that is judged affordable to people with a household income at or below the median. The majority of the literature on affordable housing discusses mortgages and a variety of housing options that fall along a continuum, starting with emergency homeless shelters and moving on to transitional housing, non-market rental (also referred to as social or subsidised housing), formal and informal rental, indigenous housing, and finally affordable home ownership.
A very complicated combination of economic, social, and psychological factors influence a person's choice of housing.
As an illustration, some households may decide to spend more on housing because they believe they can afford it, while others may not have the resources to do so.
To study more about affordable housing
https://brainly.com/question/21662044
#SPJ1
5.1.4 quiz: What is the primary goal of interest groups?
A. Replacing lawmakers through special elections
B. Pursuing lawsuits against the government
C. providing health care for their members
D. Changing or maintaining particular policies
Answers
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Changing or maintaining particular policies is the primary goal of interest groups.
How community and public policies are organized and enacted?
Answers
Answer:
Communities operate in the context of federal and state policies that can affect local government decisions relevant to health through laws and regulations, through the allocation of resources, and by shaping political will on issues and approaches. Among the more widely recognized policies are those that fund or regulate health care delivery services. But policies in a variety of areas, ranging from education to land use and housing, the environment, and criminal justice, can be relevant to health disparities. Policies can vary significantly across geographic areas and over time in establishing priorities, providing funding, or encouraging collaboration. They can provide important opportunities or constitute barriers to promoting health equity. The policy context shapes the levers that are available to communities to address change.
It seems reasonable to assume that the better informed communities are about the implications of federal and state policy and policy changes, the greater their ability will be to respond effectively to address health disparities and help achieve change in the determinants of health. And, conversely, the more the needs of communities are considered in decision making at the federal and state levels, the more effective those policies will be. In other words, policy makers have the opportunity to lay the groundwork for community success. This policy context (i.e., socioeconomic and political drivers) is highlighted in the report’s conceptual model in Figure
How old is dusty dusty
Answers
Answer:
27 years old
Explanation:
Answer:
anyone can be crusty and dusty
Explanation:
What make’s Confirmation different from Ratification
Answers
Answer: Where the signature is subject to ratification, acceptance, or approval, the signature does not establish the consent to be bound. However, it is a means of authentication and expresses the willingness of the signatory state to continue the treaty-making process. The signature qualifies the signatory state to proceed to ratification, acceptance, or approval. It also creates an obligation to refrain, in good faith, from acts that would defeat the object and the purpose of the treaty.
Explanation:
Answer:
Confirmation is verification or final proof of something. (Example) In the church, confirmation is a rite in which a person is awarded full acceptance into.
What is not a contributing factor that the Romans made towards private security?
Odue process
O active patrol
O armed bodyguards
O a private entity paid by the Roman Ruler
Answers
Which diagram correctly arranges systems of government in order from least
powerful to most powerful?
O A
A.
Authoritarian
Constitutional
Anarchy
B.
Anarchy
Authoritarian
Constitutional
C.
Totalitarian
Anarchy
Authoritarian
D.
Constitutional
Authoritarian
Totalitarian
Answers
Anarchy refers to a society without any centralized governing authority or hierarchy. Hence option B is correct .
What is systems of government in order ?In an anarchist society, individuals and communities are free to govern themselves, and decision-making is often achieved through direct democracy or consensus-based decision-making. Anarchy is often associated with anti-authoritarianism and a rejection of traditional forms of power and control.
Authoritarianism, on the other hand, is a form of government where power is concentrated in the hands of a small group or individual, often enforced through the use of repression, censorship, and propaganda. Authoritarian regimes are characterized by a lack of political freedoms, limited civil liberties, and the suppression of dissenting voices.
Constitutionalism is a political philosophy that advocates for the rule of law and limited government power, typically enshrined in a written constitution. In a constitutional system, government power is subject to legal constraints and oversight, with the aim of protecting individual rights and promoting democratic accountability. Constitutionalism is often seen as a middle ground between anarchism and authoritarianism, emphasizing the importance of both individual freedom and responsible governance.
Learn more about systems of government here
https://brainly.com/question/16571158
#SPJ5
3. Failure to provide medical care to a child is a sign of which of the following types
of abuse?
Answers
Answer: medical neglect
Explanation:
What happens to your GPA when you fail a class? Does it decrease, increase, or stay the same?
Answers
Answer:
The failing grade will NOT calculate in your GPA, but it will still show on your transcript. Meaning that people can still see that you failed a class.
You must park at least ____ away from a fire hydrant.
A. 5ft
B. 10ft
C.15ft
D.20ft
Answers
Answer:
C. 15ft
Explanation:
How will the decision in this case affect future conduct by police officers?
Answers
Police officers must constantly be able to function under stress, remain composed, and use good judgment and decision-making abilities as necessary.
What is decision-making?In psychology, choosing a belief or a plan of action from among multiple potential alternative possibilities is considered to be the product of a cognitive process. It could be unreasonable or rational, depending.
The process of creating decisions is a form of reasoning that is predicated on the values, preferences, and beliefs of the decision-maker. Every process of decision-making results in a final conclusion, which may or may not lead to action.
In particular in European psychology research, research on problem-solving is published alongside research on decision-making.
Making decisions can be seen as a problem-solving process that results in an optimal, or at least acceptable, answer. Consequently, it is a process that might be more or less reasonable or irrational and that can be founded on overt or covert facts and ideas.
Learn more about decision-making, here
https://brainly.com/question/16407152
#SPJ1
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answers
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
Describe how political differences between the major parties affect the nomination and
confirmation of justice
Answers
Answer:
Possible Changes to the Confirmation Process · by I Shapiro · Cited by 1 — Historically, the Senate has confirmed fewer than 60 percent of Supreme Court nominees under divided.
Explanation:
banda me perdi de region
t a ma re manos no se :"(
Answers
Explanation:
reza para no sientas deseos de besarme pa q Tus manos no quieren acariciarme mejor ya vete no suporto ni escucharte
what does nelson mandela mean when he says overcoming poverty is not a gesture of charity
Answers
"Overcoming poverty is not a gesture of charity. It is an act of justice. It is the protection of a fundamental human right: The right to dignity and to a decent life."
-Nelson Mandela
Nelson Mandala believes that overcoming poverty is giving others a chance to thrive, when originally, they may not have had that door. By opening them, he believes that it is just, not charitable.
Which of these actions would most likely violate civil rights laws?
A. an airline bans smoking on flights
B. a school system requires a dress code for students
C. an employer refuses to consider senior citizens for jobs
D. a police department uses written tests to help select recruits
Answers
Hello! The answer would be C: an employer refuses to consider senior citizens for jobs.
This is because one' is discriminating towards a specific group of people which happens to be senior citizens. This does not allow equal opportunity for them so there it is violating their civil rights.
1. Explain what Siegal says is his focus.
2. Why is jargon in legal communications harmful?
3. Why do you think companies, the government, and others have resisted putting agreements and legal information in simple terms.
4. Is the Internet a private place? Why or why not?
5. According to Kovacs, should sites have to ask before they collect data on users? Do you agree or disagree? Why?
6. Explain what protections are available for people and consumers in terms of what data can be collected by different sites.
7. What does Kovacs compare digital tracking to in the physical world? How do you feel about this type of tracking and why?
8. Explain why sites collect information about our behaviors online.
(Please answer all, thank you!)
Answers
Answer:
I'm not an expert in this subject but I'll try to answer some of the questions the best I can:
Explanation:
2. Jargon in legal communications can be harmful because it can be confusing and difficult for non-experts to understand. This can lead to misunderstandings and complications, and may also disadvantage individuals who are not familiar with the specialized language used.
3. There may be a number of reasons why companies, the government, and others have resisted putting agreements and legal information in simple terms. These may include the desire to protect their own interests, a belief that the specialized language used in legal documents is necessary for accuracy and precision, and a lack of resources or incentives to create simpler versions of legal documents.
4. The Internet is not a private place in the same way that a person's home or personal belongings are private. While it is possible to limit access to certain personal information online, it is not always easy to do so, and there are many ways in which information can be accessed or shared without an individual's knowledge or consent.
5. Without knowing the specific individual you are referring to or the context in which this question was asked, it is not possible for me to accurately answer this question.
6. There are a number of protections available for people and consumers in terms of what data can be collected by different sites. These may include laws that regulate the collection and use of personal data, as well as privacy policies and terms of service agreements that outline what data a site is allowed to collect and how it can be used.
7. Without knowing the specific individual you are referring to or the context in which this question was asked, it is not possible for me to accurately answer this question.
8. Sites collect information about users' behaviors online for a variety of reasons, such as to personalize content, to serve targeted advertising, to improve site functionality and user experience, and for market research and analysis. This data can be used to understand user preferences and behavior, and to improve the services and products offered by the site.
The correct answers for all of the questions is as follows:
1. The core idea behind Mindsight is described by Dr. Dan Siegel as a technique for focusing the mind on the nature of the internal environment.
2. Legal jargon can be damaging since it can be perplexing and challenging for non-experts to understand in written communications. This may harm those who are unfamiliar with the technical jargon being used and cause misunderstandings and issues.
3. There could be a variety of reasons why businesses, the government, and other parties have opposed simplifying contracts and legal documentation. Among them are the need to safeguard their own interests, the conviction that the technical language used in legal papers is essential for clarity and correctness, and a lack of resources or incentives to produce more straightforward versions of legal documents.
4. Unlike a person's house or their personal things, the Internet is not a location that is private. There are various ways in which information can be accessed or shared without a person's knowledge or consent, and while it is feasible to restrict access to some personal information online, doing so is not always simple.
5. It is impossible for me to provide a correct response to this question without knowing the precise person to whom you are referring or the context of the question.
6. Consumers and people have access to a range of protections regarding the information that various websites may gather about them. These may include rules governing the gathering and use of personal data.
7. It is impossible for me to provide a correct response to this question without knowing the precise person to whom you are referring or the context of the question.
8. Websites gather information on users' online activities for a variety of purposes, including to tailor content, deliver targeted advertising, enhance user functionality, and conduct market research and analysis. The services and products the website offers can be enhanced by using this data to better understand customer preferences and behavior.
Learn more about Dr. Dan Siegal here:
https://brainly.com/question/27108795
#SPJ2
Which statement is an accurate description of the American federal system?
States can make their own choices, as they have power over all laws.
State and federal governments are run separately, without any overlap.
The federal government informs states of what is and what is not considered legal.
The federal and state governments share powers, but federal power is supreme.
Answers
Answer: In response to conflict surrounding state governments that arose during and after the Civil War, states wrote longer constitutions. But by the late twentieth century, states seeking greater governmental efficiency usually shorted their fundamental law. Texas, however, continues to buck that trend favoring bigger over better.
Explanation:
The senate is often referred to as ‘The states’ House why ?
Answers
Answer:
The people who wrote our Constitution designed the Senate as the States House of our Parliament. Each State has an equal number of Senators, which was a compromise at the time to get the Constitution through. The smaller states wanted to ensure that they would not be disadvantaged by their small populations
Explanation:
What is the purpose of the exclusionary rule? (Select all that apply.) Responses To ensure that police do not arrest people without a legal cause. To ensure that police do not arrest people without a legal cause. To ensure that evidence is collected legally. To ensure that evidence is collected legally. To ensure that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. To ensure that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. To ensure that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant. To ensure that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant.
Answers
The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct by preventing the use of illegally obtained evidence during a criminal trial.
What is evidence?Evidence is any type of proof that is used to support a claim or conclusion. It can be physical, such as an object or document, or it can be testimonial, such as a witness providing a statement. Evidence is often used in legal proceedings to prove a point of law or fact. It can also be used in scientific research to support or refute a hypothesis. Evidence can also be used in everyday life to support an argument or decision. In any situation, evidence should be reliable, relevant, and sufficient to support the claim or conclusion.
This rule ensures that police do not arrest people without a legal cause, that evidence is collected legally, and that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. Additionally, it ensures that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant.
To learn more about evidence
https://brainly.com/question/23323608
#SPJ1
Should government be allowed to decide what
fats are used in a restaurant?
Answers
Answer:
Government should respect the voluntary choices made by individuals when it comes to their diets.
Explanation:
Answer:
He also mentioned that sales of “better-for-you” products sold in fast-food and quick-serve restaurants grew by ... inexpensive is high in sugar and fat and offered in large-portion sizes. ... The government also can encourage food companies to innovate
Explanation:
According to the Declaration of Independence, which situation justifies open rebellion against a government?
O A. high unemployment and inflation
B.
a ruler denying citizens their rights
• C.
a central government with weak powers
O D.
a long distance between a government and its people
Reset
Next
Answers
Answer:
C)a central gov with weak powers cause further delay in independence would find India in ...
Explanation:
i think
Which of the following is an idea for legislation presented to Congress?
O Amendment
O Case law
Ordinance
O Proposal
Answers
The answer is "Amendment."
If you are stopped by a police officer for driving
all passengers under the age of 18 properly restrained, you can
receive a citation and a fine of.
plus additional court
costs.
$30
$40
$50
$60
Answers
Answer:
60 u believe
Explanation:
if im wrong let me know