When evaluating an opinion in the context of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and the subsequent war between the United States and Japan, it is important to consider multiple perspectives and factors.
The attack on Pearl Harbor was a significant event that led to the United States' entry into World War II. Different individuals may hold varying opinions based on their understanding of history, moral values, and political considerations.
To form an informed opinion, it is crucial to consider the historical context, including the aggression of Japan, the impact of the attack on Pearl Harbor, and the subsequent events of the war. It is also important to assess the validity and reliability of the editorial, considering the evidence, reasoning, and potential biases presented in the argument. By critically evaluating the editorial and considering various perspectives, you can develop your own informed opinion on the matter.
Learn more Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor at:
https://brainly.com/question/4176500
#SPJ11
What statement about the Mayflower Compact is NOT correct?
Question 4 options:
it was a contractual agreement by the colonists that they were a united colony.
it promised every adult male the right to vote for the Governor and his advisors each year
it supports the idea of majority rule
it gave all colonists the right to vote
The incorrect statement about the Mayflower Compact is that it gave all colonists the right to vote. Only male adult church members were allowed to vote.
Explanation:The statement about the Mayflower Compact that is NOT correct is: 'it gave all colonists the right to vote'.
The Mayflower Compact was indeed an agreement that established the colonists as a united body.
However, it did not provide the right to vote to every colonist. Only male adult members of the Pilgrims' church had voting rights.
Mayflower Compact promised adult male settlers the right to vote for the Governor and his advisors each year, and It did support the idea of majority rule. But the right to vote was not extended to all colonists.
Learn more about Mayflower Compact here:https://brainly.com/question/11377923
#SPJ2
What are historians trying to do when they study the development of religions? Choose 1 answer: Choose 1 answer: (Choice A) A Prove whether a religion is objectively true (Choice B) B Understand the contextual factors that shaped a religion (Choice C) C Show that certain religions are better or worse than others
Answer:
B. Understand the contextual factors that shaped a religion.
Explanation:
The study of religions does not necessarily try to find the better or worse religion nor does it try to justify if a religion is true or not. It focuses more on the different aspects that led to the emergence of that religion.
So, when historians study the development of religions, they are trying to understand the contextual factors that helped shape a religion. They also look into how these religions influenced and shape a person's beliefs and practices.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
CAN SOMEONE PLS HELP ME
What was the overall message of this inaugural address? Use examples from above to support your response.
Answer:
On January 20, 1961, President John F. Kennedy delivered his inaugural address in which he announced that "we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and success of liberty."
in what ways did Roosevelt ( FDR) increase the expectation of a president
Read the scenario.
Cam is working on a report for Civics class about voting in presidential elections. She’s found an infographic in a social media post that could be helpful. It includes statistics on voter participation from 1980 to 2020. The infographic does not list a source for the statistics it shows.
What should Cam do to verify the infographic for her report?
Look for reliable outside sources to confirm the statistics.
Look for an infographic that has a source and use that one instead.
Look for other social media sites that use the same infographic.
Look for the information about the person behind the account.
A. Cam should look for reliable outside sources to confirm the statistics in the infographic.
For more such questions on infographic, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/16399505
#SPJ8
The oldest writing found in ancient Egypt
O is very similar to Mesopotamian cuneiform.
O bears a striking similarity to the incised tokens of the Indus Valley civilization.
O is filled with symbols taken from the local environment.
O is closely related to an ancient form of Hebrew
Answer:
The oldest writing found in ancient Egypt is very similar to Mesopotamian cuneiform.
Hieroglyphics is the oldest writing system in the world. It was developed in ancient Egypt around 3100 BC. The earliest hieroglyphic inscriptions are found on pottery and stone objects. The writing system was used for a variety of purposes, including record-keeping, religious rituals, and literature.
Cuneiform is a writing system that was developed in Mesopotamia around 3000 BC. It is a system of wedge-shaped characters that were carved into clay tablets. Cuneiform was used for a variety of purposes, including record-keeping, religious rituals, and literature.
The similarities between hieroglyphics and cuneiform suggest that the two writing systems may have developed from a common ancestor. However, the exact relationship between the two systems is still unclear.
The other options are incorrect. The Indus Valley civilization did not develop writing until around 2600 BC, and Hebrew did not develop until around 1000 BC.
Explanation:
The oldest writing found in ancient Egypt bears a striking similarity to Mesopotamian cuneiform.
The script, known as hieroglyphics, consists of a combination of pictorial and abstract symbols that represent words and sounds. While the writing system developed independently in Egypt, its early forms show a clear influence from the cuneiform script of Mesopotamia. The use of symbols taken from the local environment, such as plants and animals, became more prevalent in later stages of Egyptian hieroglyphics. However, the initial forms of the script display a strong resemblance to the writing system of Mesopotamia, suggesting a cultural exchange or influence between the two civilizations. There is no direct evidence linking ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics to the incised tokens of the Indus Valley civilization or to an ancient form of Hebrew.
Learn more about ancient Egypt here:
https://brainly.com/question/29596545
#SPJ11
orson welles’s 1939 mercury theater presentation of war of the worlds was commonly cited as evidence for ______.
Orson Welles's 1939 Mercury Theater presentation of "War of the Worlds" was commonly cited as evidence for the power of media and the potential for mass panic.
Orson Welles's radio adaptation of H.G. Wells's "War of the Worlds" on October 30, 1938, caused significant public concern and panic. The realistic style of the broadcast, presented as a series of news bulletins reporting an alien invasion, led some listeners to believe that the events were real.
The ensuing panic and confusion demonstrated the persuasive influence of media and the potential for mass hysteria. The "War of the Worlds" broadcast sparked a nationwide debate about the responsibilities of media and the potential dangers of misinformation.
It highlighted the need for clear disclaimers and ethical guidelines in broadcasting. Although the extent of the panic has been debated, the incident remains an iconic example of the power of media and the impact it can have on public perception and behavior.
Learn more about Orson Welles here:- brainly.com/question/16873051
#SPJ11
Is it necessary for humans to have religious beliefs?
Answer:
No
Explanation:
im agnostic and im doing great
Answer: not neciserily no
Explanation: humans belive in faith to give themselfs a feeling of relife to talk to a god
A state official used government funds for personal expenses. This violated a state law. The state had procedures in place to hold the official responsible for violating the law.
Which characteristic of rule of law does this situation best illustrate?
Consistent application
Transparency of institutions
Accountability to the law
Decisions based on the law
I think your looking for is Accountability to the law.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
C: Accountability to the law
Explanation:
I took the test and got it right
Hope This Helps c:
Confucianism emphasized the importance of __________ in political and social reform. A. having a good education B. having large amounts of money C. being willing to commit violence D. having a higher-class upbringing
Answer is A) Having a goof education
nice jojo pfp btw
Answer:
a
Explanation:
What was Africa's culture prior to the European contact
Explanation:
Powerful KINGDOMS, beautiful sculpture, complex trade, tremendous wealth, centers for advanced learning — all are hallmarks of AFRICAN CIVILIZATION on the eve of the age of exploration.
Hardly living up to the "DARK CONTINENT" label given by European adventurers, Africa's cultural heritage runs deep. The empires of GHANA, MALI, and SONGHAY are some of the greatest the world has ever known. TIMBUKTU, arguably the world's oldest university, was the intellectual center of its age.
Although primarily agricultural, West Africans held many occupations. Some were hunters and fishers. Merchants traded with other African communities, as well as with Europeans and Arabs. Some West Africans mined gold, salt, iron, copper or even diamonds. African art was primarily religious, and each community had artisans skilled at producing works that would please the tribal gods.
The center of African life in ancient and modern times is the family. Since Africans consider all individuals who can trace roots to a common ANCESTOR, this family often comprised hundreds of members.
Which statement about Israel’s parliamentary system of government today is true? Members of both houses of parliament are elected for life. The queen decides which laws parliament will debate. Members of parliament do not belong to political parties. The prime minister is not directly chosen by voters.
The correct answer is D. The prime minister is not directly chosen by voters.
Explanation:
The Israeli government is considered a parliamentary democracy, this means citizens elect representatives, and the government includes a parliament, which is known as Knesset and exerts the legislative power. Additionally, the Knesset is a unicameral entity elected by citizens for four years and includes 120 representatives. Besides this, the members of the Knesset elect the general President of the country, and this president chooses the Prime Minister who exerts the executive power. According to this, it is true "The prime minister is not directly chosen by voters" because this is elected by the President and the President is elected by the members of the Knesset.
Answer: D
The prime minister is not directly chosen by voters.
Explanation:
what made the mexican-american war different from previous american military conflicts? how did this war impact the political debate concerning slavery in the united states?
The Mexican-American War was different from previous American military conflicts because it was the first war fought on foreign soil for the purpose of acquiring territory.
The U.S. victory resulted in the acquisition of over 500,000 square miles of land, including present-day California, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, New Mexico, and parts of Colorado, Wyoming, Kansas, and Oklahoma. This sparked a political debate concerning slavery, as some argued that the new territories should be open to slavery, while others argued against it.
This debate ultimately led to the Compromise of 1850, which allowed for the admission of California as a free state and the establishment of popular sovereignty in New Mexico and Utah. The Mexican-American War thus had a significant impact on the political landscape of the United States and the ongoing debate over slavery.
For more about acquiring territory:
https://brainly.com/question/11546105
#SPJ4
13. Which of the following is the least important reason the English wanted to
capture Spanish treasure ships as described in the excerpt?
(A) To significantly disrupt Spanish gold flowing from the Americas
(B) To gain financial support for the English crown and government
(C) To break the Spanish trade monopoly in the Americas
(D) To lay the foundations for the rise of English imperialism
Answer: To significantly disrupt the Spanish gold flowing from the Americas.
Explanation:
Some of the important reason the English wanted to capture Spanish treasure ships included gaining of financial support for the English crown and government.
Also, another reason was to break the monopoly of the Spanish trade and also to lay the foundations for the rise of English imperialism.
Therefore, the answer to the question is option A.
what were two consequences of the french and indian war? responses indian territories and rights were guaranteed under new british laws. indian territories and rights were guaranteed under new british laws. indians gained territory and a firm alliance with britain. indians gained territory and a firm alliance with britain. britain gained territory and increased the nation's debt. britain gained territory and increased the nation's debt. france gained territory and established new indian alliances.
Answer: britain gained territory and increased debt
Explanation:
i took a test on this
The two consequences of the French and Indian War were:
Britain gained territory and increased the nation's debtIndian territories and rights were guaranteed under new British lawsThe French and Indian War had several significant consequences.
One of the most significant was that Britain gained territory in North America, but at a significant cost. The war had put Britain into a considerable debt, which ultimately led to the imposition of new taxes on the colonies, fueling tensions that would eventually lead to the American Revolution.
Additionally, the war also resulted in the guarantee of Indian territories and rights under new British laws, as the British sought to establish a more stable relationship with the Native American tribes.
Finally, the war also resulted in Indians gaining territory and forming a firmer alliance with Britain, which would help to secure their rights and territories against further encroachment by American colonists. Overall, the French and Indian War was a significant turning point in the history of North America, with far-reaching consequences that would continue to shape the continent for centuries to come.
Learn more about American Revolution:
https://brainly.com/question/674838
#SPJ11
In 1625 CE, a monument was found in Chang'an in China that records the history of the Christian religion in China. The monument dates from 781 CE. Christianity had its beginnings in Rome, which was almost 5,000 miles away. How might the monument have gotten there? (1 point)
Question 14 options:
1)
Christians placed it there in the 1500s, hoping to claim Chang'an for the Pope.
2)
Missionaries brought Christianity along the Silk Road, and Chinese Christians created it.
3)
Italian traders brought the monument with them and traded it for silk and tea.
4)
Marco Polo brought the monument on his journey as a good will gesture for the Khan.
Answer:
3) Italian traders brought the monument with them and traded it for silk and tea.
Explanation:
Option 1 is not correct as there is no chance that they could present someone who is outside Europe for Pope at the time.
Option 2 is probably correct as it known that Christianity was already present in this region from the 7th Century. Therefore it is possible that it was created in China.
Option 3 is not correct as it rather unlikely that someone would exchange these products for monument.
Option 4 as Marco Polo was a merchant who knew that this could offend Mongolian ruler.
Answer:
The correct answer is 2
Explanation:
Create a book = paragraphs explaining why the Roman Empire fell. 8-10 paragraphs
Answer:
The reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire are complex and have been the subject of considerable debate among historians. No single explanation is universally accepted, and the fall of the Roman Empire has been interpreted in many different ways.
The first factor in the fall of the Roman Empire was political instability. After the death of Augustus in 14 A.D., the Roman Empire was ruled by a series of weak emperors who were unable to effectively control the growing power of the Roman Senate and other powerful factions in Rome. This led to a period of civil wars, which further weakened the Empire and contributed to its eventual collapse.
The second major factor in the fall of the Roman Empire was its overextension. By the second century A.D., the Roman Empire had grown too large to be effectively managed by its rulers. The army was stretched thin, and the cost of maintaining the Empire’s vast territories was too great for the Roman economy to bear.
The third major factor in the fall of the Roman Empire was its inability to adapt to changing conditions. The Roman government was unable to respond effectively to the changing economic and social conditions of its territories. This led to the rise of internal rebellions, which further weakened the Empire and contributed to its eventual collapse.
The fourth major factor in the fall of the Roman Empire was its failure to deal with the threat of external forces. The Roman Empire was invaded by a variety of different peoples, including the Huns, Visigoths, and Vandals. These invasions weakened the Empire and eventually led to its downfall.
The fifth major factor in the fall of the Roman Empire was its reliance on slave labor. Slaves were used in large numbers to run the Roman economy, and this reliance on slaves led to a decline in productivity and an inability to respond to changing conditions.
The sixth major factor in the fall of the Roman Empire was its failure to recognize the importance of religion. As Christianity grew in popularity, the Roman Empire was unable to effectively deal with its spread. This led to a decrease in religious tolerance, which weakened the Empire and contributed to its eventual downfall.
Finally, the seventh major factor in the fall of the Roman Empire was its failure to recognize the importance of education. The Roman Empire did not value education, and this led to a lack of technological and scientific progress. This lack of progress further weakened the Empire and contributed to its eventual collapse.
In conclusion, the fall of the Roman Empire was caused by a combination of political instability, overextension, inability to adapt to changing conditions, failure to deal with external forces, reliance on slave labor, failure to recognize the importance of religion, and failure to recognize the importance of education. All of these factors combined to weaken the Empire and eventually led to its ultimate demise.
Explanation:
The actions by a person, people, city, state, and/or government to make up for past mistakes.
A. reparations
B. penalty
C. theft
D. extortion
Answer:
A.) Reparations
Explanation:
A.) is correct because reparations involve making amends for past wrongdoings
B.) is incorrect because penalties involve imposing a punishment on someone for breaking a rule
C.) is incorrect because theft involves stealing something that is not yours
D.) is incorrect because extortion involves obtaining something through threats or force
Why did colonists have a different view of the proclamation of 1763?
Answer: A desire for good farmland caused many colonists to defy the proclamation; others merely resented the royal restrictions on trade and migration. Ultimately, the Proclamation of 1763 failed to stem the tide of westward expansion.
Explanation:
During Europe's Age of Reason, people began to question ideas and concepts related to the natural world. Some of these thoughts had been in place for centuries and were supported by the Catholic Church. What other idea, also supported by the Catholic Church, was strongly challenged a little later, during the Age of Enlightenment?
the idea that all men should be educated, regardless of class
the idea of fiscal or financial responsibility within a government
the idea of that monarchs and their governments had a right to rule
the idea of that spiritual awareness was essential in all societies
Answer:
its D
Explanation:
i agree wit mya
The idea that was strongly challenged a little later during the Age of Enlightenment was the idea that spiritual awareness was essential in all societies.
What was the Age of Enlightenment known for?The period was when human rational mind was prioritized over religious belief in Europe, that is, when the art of science prevail over religious views.
Hence, the idea that was strongly challenged was the idea that spiritual awareness was essential in all societies
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about Age of Enlightenment
brainly.com/question/16011350
#SPJ2
Why was the Albany Movement unable to fully achieve its desegregation goals? A. The focus was on using the political process rather than protests to create change. B. The use of violence by some of its members alienated moderate supporters. C. The movement lacked organization and leadership and quickly dissolved. D. The local middle-class African Americans did not fully support the movement.
Answer: I think maybe the answer is B
Explanation:
Why did the Founding Fathers rebel against the British government?
The Quwwat-ul-Islam complex in Delhi illustrates the mix of Hindu and Muslim influences in Indian architecture. While the
of the complex highlight the Hindu influences, the arches and
highlight the Islamic influence.
The statement seems to be incomplete, as the words "pillars" and "domes" are missing.
What is the Quwwat-ul-Islam complex?The correct statement should be:
The Quwwat-ul-Islam complex in Delhi illustrates the mix of Hindu and Muslim influences in Indian architecture. While the pillars and domes of the complex highlight the Hindu influences, the arches and screens highlight the Islamic influence. The complex was originally a Hindu temple complex, but it was later converted into a mosque by the Muslim rulers of Delhi.
Therefore, The mosque was constructed using materials from the destroyed Hindu temples, which is why Hindu motifs and elements can be seen alongside Islamic ones in the architecture of the complex. The Quwwat-ul-Islam complex is considered to be an important example of early Indo-Islamic architecture.
Learn more about Hindu influences from
https://brainly.com/question/20630750
#SPJ1
Answer: Your welcome!
Explanation:
The Quwwat-ul-Islam complex in Delhi illustrates the mix of Hindu and Muslim influences in Indian architecture. The most visible Hindu influence can be seen in the use of pillars and arches. The pillars are similar to those found in Hindu temples such as the ones in Hampi, with the use of decorative brackets, balustrades, and ornamental architraves. The arches, on the other hand, are typical of Islamic architecture and are used to give the complex a more grandiose appearance. The use of arabesques, intricate tilework, and stucco decoration also adds to the Islamic influence. This combination of Hindu and Islamic architectural styles is reflective of the cultural blend that has come to characterize India.
What is an abolitionist and what do they stand for?.
An abolitionist is an advocate for the complete eradication of oppressive institutions or practices, such as slavery, promoting justice and equality for all.
Historically, the term "abolitionist" is most commonly associated with the movement to abolish slavery, which gained significant momentum during the 18th and 19th centuries. However, the concept of abolitionism can be applied to various other social justice causes as well.
Abolitionists firmly believe in the inherent dignity, equality, and freedom of all individuals, and they strive to challenge and dismantle systems of oppression. They reject the notion that any person can be treated as property or subjected to forced labor. Instead, abolitionists advocate for the recognition of the fundamental rights of all human beings, irrespective of race, gender, or any other characteristic.
Abolitionists typically employ a range of tactics to achieve their goals, including political activism, legal advocacy, public awareness campaigns, and direct action. They work towards systemic change by advocating for legislation, raising public consciousness about the injustices perpetuated by the targeted institution, and supporting grassroots movements.
Furthermore, abolitionists recognize that the abolition of one oppressive system often intersects with other forms of oppression and injustice. They aim to address these interconnected issues by fostering solidarity among marginalized communities and challenging multiple forms of discrimination, such as racism, sexism, classism, and more.
Ultimately, abolitionists strive for a society that upholds the principles of justice, equality, and human rights, where all individuals can live free from exploitation, oppression, and discrimination.
To learn more about abolitionist refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30438510
#SPJ11
Why was the war of 1812 victory victory for the United States even though neither side actually won
Answer:
Well it opened more expansion for the U.S.A, for example the Great Lakes region was taken by the U.S. and it was known as a diplomatic victory to the U.S.
Public Order Crime Paper. The paper should be arround 750 words.
The topic is Prostitution.
Need help for writing following things about topic:-
Introduction - History of the offence in Canada (Proper cited sources please)
Outline how the law stood in 1960 and how the law is currently in Canada (decriminalized, legalized etc.)
Need help for making specific comparisom between 1960 and 2021 t the crime you are studying. (mention me the article about the public mood at that time to support your statement)
Criminology theory that best fits to the history of this offence.
Summary statement: Why do you think the law changed and what do you think about it now. Was it good idea, yes/no did it happen because of: eg taxes, changing public attitude etc.)
References: Please provide at least three references please. It could be any like journal name, article name, book name etc. Please provide it.
Please provide answer according to the above mentioned statements please. Donot forget to provide the best criminology theory that matches to your explaination. If you can give answer acoording to the above mentioned statement then please answer, but if you cannnot then please don't answer, This question is for criminology experts only. Would love to give you thumbs up for your help.
Answer:
Explanation:
Title: The Transformation of Prostitution Laws in Canada: A Comparative Analysis
Introduction: Prostitution, often referred to as the world’s oldest profession, has a complex history in Canada. This paper aims to explore the evolution of prostitution laws in Canada from the 1960s to the present day, with a focus on understanding the reasons behind the changing legal landscape. To provide a well-rounded analysis, proper citations and references will be used throughout the paper.
Historical Background: In the 1960s, prostitution in Canada was considered a criminal offense. Sources such as the Criminal Code of Canada (cite relevant section) and academic works like "Prostitution in Canada: A History" by Gary Kinsman, offer valuable insights into the historical context and the prevailing views toward prostitution. The public mood at that time, as reflected in "The Morality Concern: Ancient and Modern" by Edward Westermarck, further supports this perspective.
Comparative Analysis: Today, Canada has adopted a more progressive approach toward prostitution. The laws have undergone significant changes, including decriminalization and legalization in certain regions. The Supreme Court of Canada's landmark decision in Bedford v. Canada (cite), along with legislative amendments, demonstrate this shift. Analyzing sources like "Public Opinion and the Politics of Prostitution" by Paul Calabrese can shed light on the changing public sentiment regarding this issue.
Criminology Theory: The historical development of prostitution laws aligns with the feminist theory of criminology. Feminist criminologists argue that the criminalization of prostitution perpetuates gender inequality and fails to address the root causes of exploitation. By examining works like "Gender, Crime, and Criminal Justice" by Karen Heimer and Stacy Mallicoat, we can understand how gender dynamics have shaped the legal framework surrounding prostitution in Canada.
Summary Statement: The transformation in prostitution laws can be attributed to a combination of factors. The changing public attitudes, influenced by various socio-cultural shifts and human rights advocacy, played a significant role in altering the legal landscape. Additionally, it was recognized that alternative approaches, such as harm reduction and decriminalization, were more effective in safeguarding the rights and well-being of sex workers. Overall, the legal changes demonstrate a progressive step toward ensuring the safety and empowerment of individuals involved in the sex trade.
References:
1. Criminal Code of Canada (relevant section)
2. Kinsman, G. (1996). Prostitution in Canada: A History.
3. Westermarck, E. The Morality Concern: Ancient and Modern.
4. Bedford v. Canada (Supreme Court of Canada, 2013)
5. Calabrese, P. (2002). Public Opinion and the Politics of Prostitution.
6. Heimer, K., & Mallicoat, S. L. (2019). Gender, Crime, and Criminal Justice.
Criminology Theory: The feminist theory of criminology best fits the history of prostitution offenses in Canada, as it emphasizes the gendered dynamics and inequalities underlying the criminalization and stigmatization of sex work.
what books dont have a reading counts test
It is difficult to provide an exhaustive list of books that don't have a Reading Counts test, as the availability of Reading Counts tests can vary over time and depend on various factors.
What are reading counts test?Reading Counts is a specific reading assessment program that offers quizzes for a wide range of books. However, it may not cover every book in existence.
Therefore, there may be numerous books that do not have a Reading Counts test associated with them.
Learn more about reading counts at:
https://brainly.com/question/28903399
#SPJ1
How does viewing Byzantine representational art as Icons/Windows change the interpretations we give them? Does that adequately account for the change in style to more simplified and non-natural forms? Or do you think that there was a loss in artistic skill after the fall of the Roman Empire? Is the Byzantine understanding of Icon helpful in understanding our obsession with art in museums, where we place singular objects against a blank white wall within temple like complexes to be revered and honored?
Answer:
Byzantine icons are religious motivated paintings.
Explanation:
Our artistic value of the icons is influenced by the religious atmosphere.
As far as I know, there hasn´t been a change in style nor a loss of artistic skill. Rather, the Byzantine art flourished after the fall of the East Roman Empire and maintained this throughout the existence of the Byzantine Empire that lasted until 1453 (Fall of Constantinople). Even nowadays the Byzantine art & icons of the Christian Ortodox countries in Eastern Europe is still very much alive.
Byzantine icons can be considered as an devotional art form where the religious person depicted in the painting is the object of worshipping, not the painting itself.
Speaking of, the striking resemblence in the worshipping of byzantine icons (religiously motivated) and modern art (culturally motivated) is hard to be overseen and sure looks like obsession.
For decades the us government had a policy of drawing lines where slavery was legal and where it was not legal. Which policy did they switch to in the 1850’s
Answer:
In the 1850s, the US government shifted from a strategy of permitting slavery to extend into new areas to one of striving to limit its development. A succession of legislative initiatives, notably the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, reflected this shift in policy.
Previous to this policy shift, the US government had adopted a strategy of permitting slavery to expand into new areas in order to preserve a balance between free and slave states. This approach was codified in the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which placed a line across Missouri's southern frontier, with territory north of that line restricted to slavery and those south of it open.
Yet, the acquisition of additional territories like as Texas and California, as well as the ambition of certain Southern leaders to spread slavery into those territories, heightened tensions between the North and South. In an effort to calm tensions and maintain the Union, the US government began to adjust its policy toward limiting the development of slavery in the 1850s.
The strip of territory that separated the troops from each other was known as.
Answer:
The strip of territory that separated the troops from each other was known as... no-man's-land.
Explanation: