1. The election of police chiefs is good for democracy as it allows the people to participate in selecting the head of this important government agency or department.
2. It is also necessary to elect sheriffs, who are county heads of law enforcement. Sheriffs' elections will guarantee better performance.
3. Law enforcement is not tied to politics through the election of the police chief and the sheriff. Instead, their election removes them from politics, especially when they are not contesting under any political party.
Why it is necessary to elect police chiefs?The election of police chiefs by the electorate involves the general voting public to determine the level and use of force to keep the community safe.
This system is a democratic process for the people in the community are involved in choosing who gets elected for law enforcement.
Election removes the position of the chief of police from the political manipulations of the politicians.
Thus, the election of the chief of police ensures that the best resident is chosen for the job, irrespective of their academic qualifications and political affiliations.
Learn more about elections for police chiefs at https://brainly.com/question/13868604
#SPJ1
What is the conflict perspective when it comes to income inequality?
Answer:
conflict theory: A social science perspective that holds that stratification is dysfunctional and harmful in society, with inequality perpetuated because it benefits the rich and powerful at the expense of the poor.
Does this help?
.For the current year, Jennifer has self-employment net income of $50,000 before any Keogh deduction and no other earned income for the year. The total amount of self- employment tax related to Jennifer's earnings was $7,064. What is the maximum amount Jennifer may deduct for contributions to her Keogh plan for the year?
The maximum amount Jennifer may deduct for contributions to her Keogh plan for the year is $10,000.
The maximum amount Jennifer may deduct for contributions to her Keogh plan for the year depends on her net self-employment income and the applicable contribution limits.
For self-employed individuals, the maximum deductible contribution to a Keogh plan is generally calculated as a percentage of their net self-employment income. As of 2021, the contribution limit is 20% of the net self-employment income, up to a maximum of $58,000.
In Jennifer's case, if her net self-employment income is $50,000, she can calculate her maximum deductible contribution by multiplying her net self-employment income by the contribution percentage.
$50,000 x 20% = $10,000
Therefore, the maximum amount Jennifer may deduct for contributions to her Keogh plan for the year is $10,000.
Learn more about contribution limits.
https://brainly.com/question/32559785
#SPJ11
A change in or addition to the constitution is called a
Answer:
amendment
Explanation:
Answer:
Amendment
Explanation:
A state law that violates the U.S. Constitution:
O Can be enforced by that state's government only.
O Can be enforced by the United States Supreme Court only.
o Can be enforced by the federal gchernment only.
Cannot be enforced.
Answer:
Not sure, but this helps! :)
Explanation:
The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution [source: FindLaw]. Basically, if a federal and state law contradicts, then when you're in the state you can follow the state law, but the fed can decide to stop you.
discuss why a stable rule of law and protection of property rights through a judicial system is critical to growth in developing countries
Stable rule of law and protection of property rights create an environment that supports economic growth, investment, innovation, and social stability in developing countries. It provides the necessary foundations for individuals and businesses to thrive, fostering long-term development and prosperity.
Encouraging investment: Investors, both domestic and foreign, are more likely to commit their resources and capital in countries where property rights are protected. A secure legal framework ensures that individuals and businesses can own and use property without fear of unlawful seizure or infringement.
Facilitating economic transactions: A well-functioning judicial system provides a reliable mechanism for enforcing contracts and resolving disputes. This certainty allows businesses and individuals to engage in economic transactions with confidence, as they have recourse to legal remedies in case of any breaches or conflicts.
To learn more about Investment visit here:
brainly.com/question/15105766
#SPJ11
discuss three contributing factors that lead to human rights violation
Answer:
Poverty, Lack of education, Lack of law enforcement.
Explanation:
Human rights violations occur when actions by state (or non-state) actors abuse, ignore, or deny basic human rights (including civil, political, cultural, social, and economic rights).
What is one way the legislature sets out its priorities?
One way the legislature sets out its priorities is through the state budget.
The budget is a plan that outlines how much money the state will spend on various programs and services during the upcoming fiscal year. The legislature, specifically the House of Representatives, is responsible for writing and passing the state budget.
The budget reflects the legislature's priorities because it allocates funding to different programs and services based on their perceived importance. For example, if the legislature prioritizes education, it may allocate more funding to public schools and universities. If it prioritizes public safety, it may allocate more funding to law enforcement and emergency services.
In addition to the budget, the legislature can also set out its priorities through the bills it introduces and passes. Legislators may introduce bills that address issues they believe are important and reflect their priorities, such as healthcare, transportation, or the environment. By passing these bills, the legislature can shape policy and advance its priorities.
Learn more about legislature here:
https://brainly.com/question/530410
#SPJ11
What does the proverb, "Motse go swa mabapi" mean? a. People help each other. O b. Harmony in love. O c. Together we stand, divided we fall.
Answer:
The answer is a.
People help each other.
I hope this is helpful!
Create a 500-word document that you will present to the court that summarizes your position and identifies any other cases you identified before Gideon’s claim in which defendants had been denied the right to counsel. Also, identify at least two court cases that later used the Gideon decision to argue for other defendants’ right to counsel
To the Court,
I am writing to present my position on the case of Gideon v. Wainwright, in which the defendant, Clarence Gideon, was denied the right to counsel in his criminal trial. I believe that the decision to deny Gideon the right to counsel was a grave injustice and violated his constitutional rights.
As you may be aware, the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right to counsel for all criminal defendants. However, this right has not always been upheld in practice. In the past, there have been numerous cases in which defendants have been denied the right to counsel, either because they could not afford an attorney or because they were not provided with one by the state.
Before Gideon's case, there were several notable examples of defendants being denied the right to counsel. For example, in Betts v. Brady (1942), the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a defendant who had been denied counsel on the grounds that the state had not provided him with an attorney. Similarly, in Powell v. Alabama (1932), the Court upheld the convictions of several defendants who had been denied counsel in a capital case, despite the fact that they had requested one.
These cases demonstrate a clear pattern of defendants being denied the right to counsel in violation of their constitutional rights. In Gideon's case, he was similarly denied the right to counsel, despite his repeated requests for an attorney. As a result, he was forced to represent himself in his criminal trial and was ultimately convicted and sentenced to prison.
Gideon's case was eventually appealed to the Supreme Court, which ruled in his favor and held that the right to counsel was a fundamental right that applied to all criminal defendants, regardless of their ability to pay. The Court's decision in Gideon v. Wainwright was a landmark ruling that established the principle of equal justice under the law and ensured that all criminal defendants would have the right to counsel in the future.
The Gideon decision has had a significant impact on the legal system and has been used to argue for the right to counsel in numerous other cases. For example, in Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972), the Court applied the Gideon decision to hold that defendants in non-capital cases have the right to counsel, even if they cannot afford one. Similarly, in Scott v. Illinois (1979), the Court used the Gideon decision to hold that states are required to provide counsel to indigent defendants in all criminal cases, regardless of the severity of the charges.
In conclusion, I believe that the decision to deny Gideon the right to counsel was a grave injustice and violated his constitutional rights. The Gideon decision has had a significant impact on the legal system and has been used to argue for the right to counsel in numerous other cases. I hope that this summary of my position and the relevant case law helps the Court to understand the importance of the right to counsel and its role in ensuring equal justice under the law.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
True or false? the professor uses the phrases the law of ideas and intellectual property law interchangeably.
Answer:
True or false? the professor uses the phrases the law of ideas and intellectual property law interchangeably.
false
before being controversially struck down by the supreme court in the citizens united case, the mccain-feingold act:
The McCain-Feingold Act, officially known as the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), was a campaign finance reform legislation that was controversially struck down by the Supreme Court in the Citizens United case.
The McCain-Feingold Act, enacted in 2002, was a significant campaign finance reform law in the United States. Its main objectives were to restrict the use of soft money (unregulated funds) in federal elections, ban national political party committees from receiving soft money, and regulate issue advocacy advertisements. The act aimed to reduce the influence of corporations and unions in the political process, promoting fair and transparent elections.
However, in 2010, the Supreme Court's ruling in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case struck down key provisions of the act, allowing corporations and unions to spend unlimited amounts of money in support of political candidates. This decision led to a significant shift in campaign finance regulations and has been a subject of ongoing debate and controversy.
To learn more about United States click here, brainly.com/question/1527526
#SPJ11
Most of the people in the line of presidential succession serve in which body?
The House of Representatives
The Cabinent
(gradpoint)
Answer:
The Cabinent
Explanation:
Only a couple are not in the President's Cabinet
For employees pursuing careers, how appropriate is West Monroe Partners development approach? Explain
West Monroe Partners' development approach can be considered appropriate for employees pursuing careers due to its comprehensive and multifaceted nature.
The company's focus on providing a supportive and growth-oriented environment aligns well with the needs of career-oriented employees. Here are a few reasons why West Monroe Partners' development approach can be seen as appropriate:
1. Tailored Development Plans: West Monroe Partners emphasizes personalized development plans for each employee. This approach recognizes that individuals have unique career goals, strengths, and areas for improvement. By tailoring development plans to individual needs, employees can receive targeted support and resources to help them progress in their careers effectively.
2. Leadership Academy: West Monroe Partners' Leadership Academy is a testament to their commitment to developing leaders within the organization. The academy provides structured training and mentorship opportunities to cultivate leadership skills at different levels. This approach demonstrates the company's investment in nurturing talent and preparing employees for future leadership roles.
3. Collaborative and Feedback-driven Culture: West Monroe Partners fosters a collaborative and feedback-driven culture where employees are encouraged to share knowledge, seek feedback, and learn from one another. This approach creates a supportive learning environment that helps employees develop their skills, broaden their perspectives, and continuously improve.
4. Variety of Learning Opportunities: West Monroe Partners offers a range of learning opportunities, including training programs, industry-specific workshops, and certifications. By providing diverse avenues for learning, employees have the chance to acquire new knowledge and skills relevant to their careers, ensuring they stay updated and adaptable in a rapidly changing business landscape.
5. Focus on Work-Life Integration: West Monroe Partners recognizes the importance of work-life integration and promotes a healthy work-life balance. This approach acknowledges that personal growth and career development are intertwined, and encourages employees to prioritize their overall well-being while pursuing their career goals.
Overall, West Monroe Partners' development approach demonstrates a commitment to nurturing talent, fostering a supportive culture, and providing tailored development opportunities. These factors contribute to the appropriateness of their approach for employees pursuing careers, as it facilitates personal and professional growth, enhances leadership capabilities, and encourages a healthy work-life integration.
for more questions on employees
https://brainly.com/question/27404382
#SPJ8
If you refuse to take a blood urine breath test to determine if you are under the influence
any task that is useful
Answer:
I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION
PLEASE ELABORATE
what harm occurs by tagging the term ""policing"" onto a descriptive phrase of a strategic approach
The practice of attaching the term "policing" to a descriptive expression of a strategic approach can be harmful. It gives the impression that the solution to the issue at hand is to hire more police or to enforce existing laws more strictly.
However, these approaches may not be the most effective in resolving the issue, and may also lead to unintended consequences. Here are some reasons why the use of the term "policing" in strategic approaches can be harmful:
1. It can contribute to the over-policing of communities. When the term "policing" is used in strategic approaches, it can create the impression that the solution to a problem is to increase the number of police officers in the area. However, this may lead to the over-policing of communities, which can be harmful, particularly for marginalized communities.
2. It can perpetuate harmful stereotypes. The use of the term "policing" in strategic approaches can perpetuate harmful stereotypes about certain communities, particularly communities of color. It can suggest that these communities are inherently dangerous or in need of constant surveillance and control.
3. It can limit the scope of potential solutions. When "policing" is attached to a descriptive expression of a strategic approach, it can limit the scope of potential solutions. For example, it may prevent policymakers from considering community-based approaches or other alternatives to policing that may be more effective in resolving the issue at hand. 4. It can lead to unintended consequences. The use of the term "policing" in strategic approaches can lead to unintended consequences, such as increased rates of incarceration or police brutality. These consequences can be harmful to individuals and communities and may exacerbate the issue at hand rather than resolve it.
In summary, the use of the term "policing" in strategic approaches can be harmful as it can contribute to the over-policing of communities, perpetuate harmful stereotypes, limit the scope of potential solutions, and lead to unintended consequences. Policymakers and advocates should carefully consider the language they use when discussing issues and ensure that their approaches are inclusive, effective, and do not harm the communities they aim to serve.
To know more about Policing visit-
brainly.com/question/31938160
#SPJ11
Please help me :\
In your own opinion, what is one advantage and one disadvantage of being a defense lawyer?
Answer:
Varies
Explanation:
Defense lawyers possess knowledge of the legal system compared to other people. They can protect people from hefty penalties. They can handle cases better than most and save time and money.
The disadvantages can be seen through ethics, morals, or emotions. An example is being emotionally involved in a case, which will give yourself a dilemma between following your own consciousness or following the law.
How can citizens get a law passed without the state legislature's help?
Answer:
Below:-
Explanation:
Citizens can not passed a bill without the legislature's help!!! due to this sentence:-
"Ultimately, a law can only be passed if both the Senate and the House of Representatives introduce, debate, and vote on similar pieces of legislation."
Winston pays a yearly fee to Barbara to rent stall space for his horse at the fairgrounds. Winston’s tenancy is best classified as:
the passage of the lend-lease bill in 1941 signaled what about american opinion?
The passage of the lend-lease bill in 1941 signaled a shift in American opinion towards greater support for involvement in World War II.
The bill allowed the United States to provide military aid to Allied countries without actually joining the war effort. This move was seen as a way to assist the Allies in their fight against Nazi Germany and protect American interests without directly engaging in combat.
The lend-lease bill reflected a growing recognition among Americans that the war in Europe and Asia posed a threat to US national security. Prior to the bill's passage, there had been a strong isolationist sentiment in the US, with many Americans wary of getting involved in foreign conflicts. However, the fall of France in 1940 and the continued aggression of Nazi Germany convinced many Americans that the US could not afford to remain neutral. The lend-lease bill was seen as a compromise between those who wanted to aid the Allies and those who wanted to stay out of the war. While it did not commit the US to fighting, it allowed the country to provide much-needed support to its allies and paved the way for greater involvement in the conflict down the line. Overall, the lend-lease bill was a significant turning point in American opinion towards WWII, marking the beginning of a shift towards greater interventionism and support for the Allies.
Learn more about lend-lease bill in 1941: https://brainly.com/question/30122853
#SPJ11
If Eilene, a shareholder, sues in a derivative suit, the judgment will be paid to:
a. the board of directors.
b. Eilene directly.
c. the shareholders as a dividend.
d. the corporate treasury.
If Eilene, a shareholder, sues in a derivative suit, any judgment or award resulting from the suit will be paid to the corporate treasury.
This is because a derivative suit is a legal action brought by a shareholder on behalf of the corporation itself, rather than for the individual benefit of the shareholder. Any damages or other monetary awards received as a result of the suit are therefore considered assets of the corporation, and must be used for the benefit of all shareholders.
The board of directors is responsible for deciding how to use these funds in the best interests of the corporation and its shareholders. While the outcome of a derivative suit can ultimately lead to benefits for individual shareholders, such as increased share value or dividend payouts, the initial payment will always be made to the corporate treasury.
Learn more about corporate treasury here:
https://brainly.com/question/28392297
#SPJ11
which of the following must you complete when you have your learners license (permit)?
Answer: yes, you have to have your permit done
Explanation: went to driving school
unfair legal acts in california denying client acess to property in storage
Unfair legal acts in California that deny clients access to their property in storage may be addressed through legal remedies and protections available under California law.
If a client is being unjustly denied access to their property in storage, they may have recourse through the following avenues:
California Civil Code: Clients can consult relevant sections of the California Civil Code, such as Section 2175-2180, which governs the relationship between a storer and a storer's property. These provisions outline the rights and responsibilities of both parties and provide protections for the client against unfair practices.
Contractual Agreements: Reviewing the contract or agreement between the client and the storage facility is essential. It may outline the terms and conditions regarding access to the stored property, and any violation of the agreed-upon terms may constitute a breach of contract.
Legal Action: If all attempts to resolve the matter directly with the storage facility fail, the client may consider pursuing legal action. This may involve filing a lawsuit to enforce their rights, seeking damages for any losses suffered, or requesting injunctive relief to regain access to the stored property.
Legal Assistance: Engaging the services of an attorney who specializes in property or contract law can provide
learn more about California law here
https://brainly.com/question/30390837
#SPJ11
What implied powers would
Congress likely have because
of the expressed power to
stablish post offices?
Answer: carry, deliver, and regulate the mail of the United States as a whole.
Explanation:
Philippine Laws 1. Under R. A. No. 11765, can the financial regulators issue subpoena duces et ad testificandum? For what purpose? 2. Do these financial regulators possess judicial power? Explain. 3. How are complaints against financial service providers addressed? Explain. 4. Apart from the power to decide complaints filed before a financial regulator, what other modes, if any, can be availed of to settle disputes? Explain. 5. When a witness appearing before an investigation by a financial regulator fails to follow a directive due to inadvertence, is this a sufficient basis to cite the witness in contempt? Why?
Under R.A. No. 11765, financial regulators within the Philippines can difficulty subpoenas duces et ad testificandum to compel witnesses. Financial regulators no longer own judicial electricity however have regulatory authority.
Complaints towards economic service carriers are addressed in a -step manner, and alternative modes of dispute resolution like mediation and arbitration may be used. Inadvertent failure to comply with a directive won't be sufficient for a contempt citation.
1. Under R.A. No. 11765, which relates to the regulatory framework for economic institutions within the Philippines, the financial regulators have the strength to trouble subpoenas duces et advert testificandum. These subpoenas are issued for the motive of compelling witnesses to offer testimony or produce documents relevant to an investigation performed by the financial regulator.
2. While monetary regulators own positive powers and authorities, they do no longer possess judicial energy. Judicial power is vested exclusively inside the courts, and financial regulators, as administrative bodies, no longer have the authority to render very last judgments or choices which have the force of law.
Instead, their position is to alter and supervise monetary establishments, put into effect relevant laws and regulations, and behavior investigations to make certain compliance.
3. Complaints in opposition to economic service companies in the Philippines are normally addressed through a -step process. First, the complainant might also report a grievance immediately with the financial service provider involved. The issuer is then anticipated to investigate the grievance and provide a response to the complainant within a reasonable duration.
If the complainant is unhappy with the company's response or if the company fails to deal with the complaint, the complainant may additionally proceed to the second step.
In the second one step, the complainant might also amplify the criticism to the correct financial regulator. The regulator will overview the complaint, conduct its personal investigation if necessary, and facilitate a resolution between the parties concerned.
The regulator can also impose sanctions or consequences on the financial provider issuer if it is found to have violated relevant legal guidelines or regulations.
4. Apart from the electricity to determine proceedings filed before an economic regulator, alternative modes of dispute resolution will also be availed of to settle disputes between events. These modes consist of mediation, arbitration, and conciliation. Mediation includes a neutral 1/3 celebration helping the events in accomplishing a voluntary settlement.
Arbitration entails the submission of the dispute to an independent arbitrator or panel for a binding choice. Conciliation is a method wherein a third birthday party assists the parties in achieving a together suitable resolution. These alternative modes offer parties with additional options to solve disputes outside the formal regulatory procedure.
5. If a witness appearing earlier than an investigation by using a financial regulator fails to comply with a directive because of inadvertence, it is able to no longer be robotically taken into consideration enough basis to quote the witness in contempt. The dedication of contempt typically calls for a planned and willful disobedience of a lawful order or directive.
Inadvertence suggests an accidental failure to conform, which may be addressed via another manner, including a reminder or explanation of the directive. However, repeated or planned disregard of a directive can also sooner or later lead to the possibility of being stated for contempt, depending on the unique occasions and the discretion of the economic regulator carrying out the investigation.
To know more about Arbitration,
https://brainly.com/question/29494601
#SPJ4
A type of lawsuit originating under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code that allows people to sue government employees for violating their constitutional rights is ___
A type of lawsuit originating under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code that allows people to sue government employees for violating their constitutional rights is a 1983 lawsuit.
In other words, the violation of an established right must be alleged by the plaintiff in order for their claim to be actionable under Section 1983. A human rights lawsuit is one filed under Section 1983. Anyone whose civil rights have been infringed may file one.
If the perpetrator acted illegally, the victim may bring a claim. 1. According to the U.S. Constitution or specific federal statutes, civil rights are protected.
Consider the scenario if a member of the Metropolitan Police Department unlawfully detained a person. The person was physically abused by several officers while being arrested. It is conceivable that this behavior would justify a Chapter 1983 civil rights complaint against it.
learn more about lawsuits here
https://brainly.com/question/26747114
#SPJ4
Which of the following events from World War II is an extreme illustration of the Principal-Agent Problem?
O The invasion of Pearl Harbor
The loss of the U.S.S. Indianapolis
The dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan
O The Nazi establishment of concentration camps
Hitler's leadership of the Third Reich's war effort
Answer:
Hitler's leadership of the Third Reich's war effort.
Explanation:
By definition, a party (agent) agrees to work in favor of another (principle) in return for some incentive.
You should now be familiar with two Supreme Court cases related to the Eighth Amendment and juvenile law. Now you will use what you've learned to write an extended response to the focus question. Imagine your state is having voters decide the issue of whether to allow juveniles to be tried and sentenced as adults. The local newspaper has asked students in your course to submit an article on the topic to give minors a voice in the debate. The editor explains that your audience includes voting adults who may be undecided on the issue. Your job is to write a persuasive article to convince them to your side.
Your article will be graded on content and quality. Be sure to use facts and quotes where appropriate to explain or justify your claim. Relate court cases that you have learned about to each other and refer to what you have learned in lessons. You may use this template to organize your article. Should the courts treat minors the same as adults when they are accused of serious crimes?
this is not a question sir
A buyer entered into a written contract with a seller to purchase his commercial property for $100,000. The contract did not specify the quality of title to be conveyed, and made no mention of easements or reservations. The closing was set for November 25, three months from the signing of the contract. Shortly thereafter, the buyer obtained a survey of the property, which revealed that the city had an easement for the public sidewalk that ran in front of the store. Because this actually enhanced the value of the property, the buyer did not mention it to the seller. Subsequently, the buyer found a better location for her business. On November 1, the buyer notified the seller that she no longer intended to purchase the property. The seller told her that he intended to hold her to her contract. At closing, the buyer refused to tender the purchase price, claiming that the seller's title is unmarketable and citing the sidewalk easement as proof of that fact. In a suit for specific performance, will the seller likely prevail? A: Yes, because the contract did not specify the quality of title to be conveyed. B: Yes, because the buyer was aware of the visible easement and it enhanced the value of the property. C: No, because an easement not provided for in the contract renders title unmarketable. D: No, because the buyer gave the seller sufficient notice of her change in plans and yet he made no effort to try to find another purchaser.
No, because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable.
The presence of an easement that was not addressed in the contract renders the title unmarketable, as stated in option C. As a result, the seller will not likely prevail in a suit for specific performance.
Specific performance is a legal concept where a court orders one party to perform a specific act. It is frequently employed in contract law cases. The goal of specific performance is to make the contract come to life. Specific performance is a legally binding contract remedy that allows a party to force the other party to perform their contractual obligations. According to the case mentioned, in a suit for specific performance, the seller is unlikely to prevail because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable. The buyer found out that there was an easement for the public sidewalk that ran in front of the store. Although it enhanced the value of the property, the buyer did not tell the seller about it.
The seller could hold the buyer to the contract, but the buyer refused to tender the purchase price because the title is unmarketable, citing the sidewalk easement as proof. Furthermore, the contract did not specify the quality of the title to be conveyed, nor did it mention easements or reservations.
Read more about valid binding contract in terms of performance here:
https://brainly.com/question/32959753
#SPJ11
You look at a box of cereal in the grocery store and, to your surprise, see your photo on it. You may probably sue for the tort of:a. assaultb. malicious prosecutionc. invasion of privacyd. defamatione. none of the other choices
If your image was put on a cereal box without your permission, we might have a strong case for invasion of privacy.
A multitude of wrongdoings, such as using someone else's name or likeness for profit, are included in the tort known as invasion of privacy. A person's right to privacy may be violated by unauthorized use of their picture or likeness for commercial gain, which may give rise to a lawsuit for damages.
However, whether you have a good case for invasion of privacy in this situation would rely on a number of things, including the specifics of how your photograph was used, the context where it was used, and if you have previously
Hence, the correct option is C.
Learn more about invasion of privacy, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2732893
#SPJ4