There is a direct correlation between the development of laws that criminalize a particular type of organized criminal behavior or activity and the expansion of criminal enterprises.
What is an organized crime Why is it called organized?The fact that organized crime is "organized" is the key distinction between it and other types of criminal activity. In general, it excludes impulsive, ad hoc, and individual criminal activities. Instead, it only emphasizes deliberate actions that represent the work of teams of people.
Complex of highly centralized businesses organized as part of organized crime with the intention of carrying out unlawful activities. Such groups commit crimes such cargo theft, fraud, robbery, kidnapping for ransom, and extortion for "protection" fees.
For control of territory, organized criminal groups frequently engage in conflict with one another and occasionally form alliances. For instance, in earlier decades, Jewish and Italian criminal organizations collaborated to combat other organized crime organizations. Each of them has its own internal hierarchies, complete with leaders and followers.
To know more about organized crime, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/14568233
#SPJ4
Explain THREE ways in which impoverished members of the South African community find it difficult to access healthcare services as set out in the National Health Act of 2003. (3 x 2) (6)
The three ways may include poverty and its correlates, geographic area of residence, race and ethnicity, gender, age, language spoken, and disability status.
What are the Factors that influence the delivery of health services?Factors that influence the delivery of health services in South Africa are technology, Healthcare product and service prices, Market power, Health insurance coverage, Demographics and patient characteristics.
These factors greatly affected the delivery of health services in South Africa.
There is lack of advance technology that provide by the health services in the country as well as high prices of the services which can't afford by the patient.
Learn more about healthcare services, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/13034150
#SPJ1
Foreign policy is?
A. The way in which the United States shares intelligence with other nations
B. An alliance with foreign countries in order to prevent war
C. A collection of free trade agreements between two nations
D. Strategies and goals that guide a nation's relations with other countries
E. Both B & C
Answer:
D. Strategies and goals that guide a nation's relations with other countries
Complete the statement with the correct options.
The ____ unit analyzes body fluids, such as ____ to identify victims and suspects.
A: Ballistics
B: Photography
C: Biology
-------------------
A: Hair
B: Teeth
C: Blood
Answer:
biology, blood.
Explanation:
ballistics deals with 2A, so not that one. and crime scene photography does not analyze evidence filmed. but bio does to test for who's dna etc. you can use hair teeth and blood to identify a victim or suspect but with the given example of bodily fluids blood is the best answer. hope this helps.
hey everyone . sorry . I always answered your all questions from Google which was a cheating . sorry if u think that I am a cheater. but now I will try to answer by my self
which u.s. supreme court case established that, under the fourth amendment, the police may arrest an individual without a warrant for a minor criminal offense punishable only by a fine?
why do business managers need to pay attention to the developments in a social cultural environment?
Explanation:
Business managers need to know the trends and what is popular to help grow business.
For the U.S. government, which of the following is NOT an example of discretionary spending? For the U.S. government, which of the following is NOT an example of mandatory spending? Defense spending Medicare Science spending For the U.S. government, which of the following is NOT an example of mandatory spending? Social Security Medicare Interest on the national debt Education spending Which type of spending currently takes up a larger proportion of the U.S. federal budget? Mandatory spending and discretionary spending take up an equal amount Mandatory spending Discretionary spending
For the U.S. government, defense spending and science spending are examples of discretionary spending, while Medicare is NOT an example of discretionary spending.
Discretionary spending refers to the portion of the budget that is determined through the annual appropriations process and can be adjusted by Congress. Examples include defense spending, science spending, and education spending.
For the U.S. government, Social Security, Medicare, and interest on the national debt are examples of mandatory spending, while education spending is NOT an example of mandatory spending.
Mandatory spending is the spending on programs that are required by law, and their budgets are not subject to the annual appropriations process. Examples include Social Security, Medicare, and interest on the national debt.
In terms of the proportion of the U.S. federal budget, mandatory spending currently takes up a larger proportion compared to discretionary spending. Mandatory spending includes programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, which together make up a significant portion of the budget.
Discretionary spending, on the other hand, is subject to annual appropriations and is more flexible, but typically accounts for a smaller proportion of the budget.
To know more about discretionary spending refer here: https://brainly.com/question/12602941#
#SPJ11
true or false. the ucc permits a court to refuse to enforce a sales contract that it finds to be unconscionable.
A sales contract that a judge determines to be unconscionable may not be enforced under the UCC. Even though the price is "open," a sales agreement for products is still valid. Unless the parties specify an estimate of future amounts, an output or requirement contract is not enforceable.
What is meant by unconscionable?In contract law, the concept of unconscionability is used to explain clauses that are so blatantly unfair—or heavily biased towards the party with the upper hand in negotiations—that they are inimical to morality. An adjective meaning "unconscionable" is "without a conscience," "scrupulous," or "so unfair or unjust that it shocks the conscience." In the realm of contract law, the word is frequently used to describe agreements that contain blatantly oppressive and unfair conditions. A court can declare a contract unenforceable if it does so.Unconscionable behavior is defined as stunningly awful or outrageous behavior that demonstrates a lack of conscience. One of the grounds for invalidating a whole contract or certain provisions of it is unconscionable conduct.To learn more about unconscionable, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/12310986
The exclusionary rule states that Group of answer choices federal law cannot be applied in state courts. the laws of one state court cannot be applied in the courts of another state. evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. state law cannot be applied in federal courts. none of the above.
The exclusionary rule states that evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. Therefore option (C) is the correct answer.
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. This rule prevents police officers from using evidence that they have collected in violation of an individual's constitutional rights. Therefore, if the court finds that evidence was obtained through illegal means, it will not be allowed to be used during a trial.The exclusionary rule does not prohibit the use of illegally obtained evidence in all circumstances. The rule only applies if the evidence was obtained in a manner that violates a person's constitutional rights.
The exclusionary rule states that evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. This means that if the evidence is collected in violation of a person's constitutional rights, it cannot be used in court against that individual. In summary, the correct option for the question is: Evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. Option (C) is correct answer.
Learn more about exclusionary rule https://brainly.com/question/12239906
#SPJ11
Owen is offered a contract to join a professional basketball team. He accepts their offer. What is TRUE about this acceptance?
OA. Owen has offered his new team a consideration.
OB
Owen has given his team power of attorney
O C. Owen has now agreed to a living will,
OD
Owen has participated in the concurrence of wills.
Reset
Next
Answer:
Owen has participated in the concurrence of wills.
Explanation:
Just took the test and the other fool who answered was wrong.
The true statement describes the acceptance of Owen is that where participated in the concurrence of wills.
Option D is correct.
What is a contract?A contract that signifies the roles and liabilities of both the parties after accepting it.
The acceptance in a contract is defined as when one party confirms the terms and conditions being defined by other party. According to the situation, Owen agreeing to the contract of joining the football team presents his acceptance to it.
Therefore, the statement written in option D is correct.
Learn more about the contract in the related link:
https://brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ2
1. The Articles of Confederation was adopted by Congress in ______ but not ratified until _____.
Answer:
The Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation, the first constitution of the United States, on November 15, 1777. However, ratification of the Articles of Confederation by all thirteen states did not occur until March 1, 1781
Explanation:
A motorist should keep at least ___ feet behind a signaling
A motorist should keep at least 100 feet behind a signaling.
Drivers, often known as motorists, must pay attention to pedestrians and avoid using bike lanes.
The term "motorists" is frequently used in news reports when discussing groups of drivers, such as all of the drivers in Chicago's downtown or the rural drivers on two-lane highways.
Motorist is another word for "driver," which initially originated in the late 19th century, around the time the first autos did, and originally meant "motor car driver." Motorists need to be alert of pedestrians and stay out of bike lanes.
The word "motorists" frequently appears in news reports when discussing drivers as a group, such as all the motorists in downtown Chicago.
To know more about the Motorist visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1114291
#SPJ9
as a president who came to power without popular acceptance explain with five reasons how you can gain acceptability from your people
Answer:
The answer is below.
Explanation:
1. Reduce Taxes: by reducing the rate of taxes, the economic burden on the people will be reduced, thereby changing people's negative notions about me.
2. Creates direct employment: creating direct government employment will be seen as a good effort by the people as President that have their interest at heart, and is ready to eliminate unemployment.
3. Hold open forums and discuss with the people periodically: this will be a good platform for people to ask me about what they need, and getting a direct and positive response from me will definitely change their negative mind about me.
4. Creates enabling environments for businesses to thrive: a good enabling environment for businesses will, in turn, improve the standard of living of the people, thereby people will generally be happy.
5. Elevate economy through inclusive governmental policy: by ensuring every representative of the socio-political group is part of my administration, this will influence people to have a positive mind towards me.
Commercial law is a branch of public laws
for tyhe branchesExplanation:
Xavier Jones was injured in an accident caused by another driver who did not have insurance. Xavier's medical expenses would be covered by:
In the situation wherein Xavier Jones was injured in an accident caused due to another uninsured driver, then the medical expenses of Xavier would be under the cover of the uninsured motorist protection.
The uninsured person may be taken into general understanding as the person who does not hold any insurance against his or her name, and has not subscribed to any insurance policy, with or without payment of insurance premium. The person at loss would not be covered by the uninsured person, but a protection regarding the same is already made to cover the medical outgoes.
Learn more about uninsured here:
https://brainly.com/question/24315960
#SPJ4
Which of the following are Strategic Communications?
Explanation:
-.- .- -. -.. .. .-.. .-.. .
The strategic communication is "High-level directions, resource priority decisions, roles and responsibilities determinations, and incident management courses of action." Thus, option second is correct.
What is Strategic Communication?Strategic communication is defined as "the intentional use of communication by an organization to achieve its objective." Key principles such as audience analysis, goal formulation, and communication strategy are identified. The term strategic has traditionally been used to management and decision-making capacity.
Strategic thinking is important because it stimulates creative processes. Strategic communication aids in making innovative ideas sound wise and strategic.
"High-level instructions, resource priority decisions, roles and duties determinations, and incident management courses of action" are examples of strategic communication. As a result, option two is correct.
Learn more about Strategic Communication here,
https://brainly.com/question/28178115
#SPJ2
Your question was incomplete, probably the complete question was....
Communications between on-scene command and tactical personnel and cooperating agencies and organizations. High-level directions, resource priority decisions, roles and responsibilities determinations, and incident management courses of action. Coordination of support of strategic and tactical communications.Emergency alerts and warnings; press conferences.When a judge excludes all witnesses from the courtroom, except for the person testifying, it is called _____.
Answer:
Sequestering
Explanation:
a practice used during the trial whereby the judge excludes all witnesses from the courtroom except the person testifying.
Why does the Party try to isolate citizens from each other?
A. To prevent romantic relationships from occurring
B. To prevent citizens from discussing the Party's policies and rising up against the government
C. To prevent an outbreak of a deadly pandemic
D. To maintain class separation
Answer:
B to prevent citizen from discussing the party policies and rising up against the government
The Party in George Orwell's novel 1984 tries to isolate citizens from each other mainly to prevent them from discussing the Party's policies and rising up against the government. The correct option is B
This is because the Party's ultimate goal is to maintain absolute control over the population and any form of dissent or rebellion is seen as a threat to its power.
Additionally, the Party discourages romantic relationships as they may distract citizens from their loyalty to the Party and potentially create a sense of loyalty towards their partner instead.
Maintaining class separation is also a tactic used by the Party to prevent unity among citizens and maintain the hierarchical structure of society.
The prevention of a deadly pandemic is not a primary reason for the Party's isolation tactics in the novel.
To know more about George Orwell's refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/12380617#
#SPJ11
In a successful civil RICO action, what civil remedies are available to the prevailing party?
allow the recovery of treble damages (damages in triple the amount of actual/compensatory damages).
wikipedia
1. Explain your answers to the following questions:
• Why is public order necessary?
2. Does society have enough public order or too little?
Who conducts the performance evaluation on the battalion chief?
captain
deputy chief
lieutenant
paramedic
Answer:
b
Explanation:
this is stupid
Answer:
Lieutenant
edge 2021
Explanation:
search and seizure laws and self incrimination laws originate
from the 2nd amendment to the constitution
true or false
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Search and seizure laws and self-incrimination laws do not originate from the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. These legal principles are derived from other provisions within the Constitution and its amendments.
Search and seizure laws primarily stem from the Fourth Amendment, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures conducted by the government. The Fourth Amendment establishes requirements for obtaining search warrants, probable cause, and reasonable expectations of privacy.
Self-incrimination laws find their roots in the Fifth Amendment, which guarantees that no person shall be compelled to be a witness against themselves in a criminal case. This protection ensures that individuals have the right to remain silent and avoid self-incrimination during legal proceedings.
The Second Amendment, on the other hand, pertains to the right to bear arms and the regulation of militias. It does not directly relate to search and seizure laws or self-incrimination laws.
Identify the true statements about the relationship between Congress and the interstate commerce of the United States. a. The power of Congress over commerce is very broad; it extends to all interstate commerce, be it great or small.b. The persons engaged in interstate commerce as well as the activities affecting it are regulated by Congress.
Answer:
Both statements are true regarding the relationship between Congress and the interstate commerce of the United States.
Explanation:
A. The power of Congress over commerce is indeed very broad and extends to all forms of interstate commerce, regardless of scale or magnitude. This authority is derived from the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states.
B. Congress has the authority to regulate not only the activities directly involved in interstate commerce but also the individuals or entities engaged in such commerce. This includes regulating various aspects related to interstate trade, such as transportation, communication, trade practices, and market competition.
Does the president have the power to lead the U.S. Armed Forces? Or is that up to the Congress?
Answer:
The Constitution explicitly assigns the president the power to sign or veto legislation, command the armed forces, ask for the written opinion of their Cabinet, convene or adjourn Congress, grant reprieves and pardons, and receive ambassadors. Commander-in-chief. The president of the United States is the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces and as such exercises supreme operational command over all national military forces of the United States.
What is classical criminology
Answer:
In criminology, the classical school usually refers to the 18th-century work during the Enlightenment by the utilitarian and social-contract philosophers Jeremy Bentham and Cesare Beccaria.
Explanation:
Hope it helps! Correct me if I am wrong :>
Im sure about my answer :>
If you dont mind can you please mark me as brainlest?
it's a label of series of writing from the late eighteenth early nineteenth century
The Texas Judicial Campaign Fairness Act
a. restricts judicial advertising to radio and television ads.
b. forbids law firms or corporations from making donations.
c. limits the amount of campaign contributions a judicial candidate can receive from an individual donor.
d. compels a judge to recuse himself or herself from any case involving someone who has contributed money to his or her campaign.
e. allows individuals to donate as much money as they can to judicial candidates.
The correct answer is c. The Texas Judicial Campaign Fairness Act limits the amount of campaign contributions a judicial candidate can receive from an individual donor.
This legislation aims to ensure fairness and prevent the influence of large donations on judicial campaigns.
By imposing contribution limits, the act seeks to promote a more level playing field among judicial candidates and reduce the potential for undue influence in the judiciary. It is an effort to maintain the integrity and impartiality of the judicial system by placing restrictions on the amount of financial support that candidates can receive from individual donors.
To know more about judicial visit :-
brainly.com/question/19729123
#SPJ11
What is definition enclosure movement
When parking near a curb while facing uphill, you should turn your (front) wheels _____.
When parking near a curb while facing uphill and there is a curb, you should turn your front wheels away from the curb and towards the road. This is because it will help prevent the car from rolling back down the hill.
The correct answer is away from the curb and towards the road.
Turning your wheels this way creates a wedge that will prevent your car from rolling back down the hill if the brakes fail. If the car starts to roll, the curb will stop the rear wheels from rolling, while the front wheels will roll away from the curb and towards the road.
The angled wheels will help the car to move away from the curb, giving it enough space to turn and correct itself, thus preventing the car from rolling back down the hill. It's also essential to engage the handbrake when parking on a hill, regardless of whether your wheels are turned.
To learn more about uphill, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30236255
#SPJ4
What important rule was introduced in 1954 to speed up the tempo of the game?
Answer:
the clara clarckston rule
Explanation:
Answer:
Then in 1954, the 24-second shot clock was introduced. This was done to increase the speed of the game, by forcing the team with the basketball to shoot the ball before the 24-second timer is up. Finally, the NBA introduced the three-point line, in the 1979-1980 season.
Heidi has brought a civil lawsuit against Linda. Linda's lawyer tells her precedent supports her defense. The lawyer's statement means Heidi's lawsuit is frivolous. , Not Selected does not guarantee that Linda will win the case. , Not Selected Incorrect answer: means Linda will win the case. means Heidi's lawsuit is based on statutory law.
Answer:
The lawyer's statement means Heidi's lawsuit is frivolous.
Explanation:
Precedents in the courts of law are previously established cases whose judgements can be referenced in successive case. In the case above, Linda is the defendant because the burden of proof lies on her. She needs to put up a defense to contest the accuracy of her lawsuit.
When the lawyer tells her that precedent supports her defense, it means that previously established cases on that matter support Linda's case. Therefore, Heidi's lawsuit against Linda was frivolous and lacked merit. Linda has a high chance of winning the case.