Answer:
The Uruguay Round was a series of trade negotiations that took place from 1986 to 1994. The negotiations were among 123 countries and were the first major trade negotiations to take place under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The negotiations resulted in the creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO), which is an international organization that oversees the global rules of trade.
In addition to the establishment of the WTO, the Uruguay Round negotiations resulted in several other agreements. These include the following:
The Agreement on Agriculture, which established rules for international trade in agricultural products and sought to reduce barriers to trade in this sector
The Agreement on Textiles and Clothing, which phased out the global system of quotas on textiles and clothing trade
The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), which established rules for international trade in services
The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), which established minimum standards for the protection of intellectual property rights
The Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), which sought to reduce barriers to trade that arise from technical regulations, standards, and testing procedures
These agreements, along with the establishment of the WTO, were seen as significant achievements of the Uruguay Round negotiations and have had a lasting impact on international trade.
What make’s Confirmation different from Ratification
Answer: Where the signature is subject to ratification, acceptance, or approval, the signature does not establish the consent to be bound. However, it is a means of authentication and expresses the willingness of the signatory state to continue the treaty-making process. The signature qualifies the signatory state to proceed to ratification, acceptance, or approval. It also creates an obligation to refrain, in good faith, from acts that would defeat the object and the purpose of the treaty.
Explanation:
Answer:
Confirmation is verification or final proof of something. (Example) In the church, confirmation is a rite in which a person is awarded full acceptance into.
Which step in the trial is most likely to include testimony from the arresting and/or investigating police officer?
- opening statements
- prosecution case-in-chief
- defense case-in-chief
- closing arguments
Answer:
B
Explanation:
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
Are bails fair? And why?
please mention at least 20 fundamental human rights in the constitution
Answer:
The fundamental human rights contained in the constitution of Nigeria are: the Right to Life, the Right to Dignity of Human Person, the Right to Personal Liberty, the Right to Fair Hearing, the Right to Private and Family Life, the Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion, the Right to Freedom of Expression.
Even though he's only 19 years old, Bennie has witnessed more murders than he can
count in his St. Louis neighborhood. He's been involved in his neighborhood gang
since he was in elementary school and has committed many illegal acts he felt
pressured to do. However, he's come to the point where he's making some contacts
outside of his gang friends when he walks to another neighborhood where his friend
Donny has moved. Donny tells him about other activities he's involved in, such as a
community center basketball program. By the time he turns 21, Bennie has started
spending less time with his friends in the gang and more time connected with his
friend Donny and Donny's welcoming family. He began to reject the view that the
gang is central to his life or that killing is "necessary to survive" as he used to believe.
Murder is defined as the unlawful killing of another human without reason or legitimate argument, particularly the unlawful killing of another human with hatred in mind.
How is a homicide defined?Murder is defined as the unlawful killing of another human without reason or legitimate argument, particularly the unlawful killing of another human with hatred in mind.
Depending on the region, this state of thought may differentiate murder from other types of unlawful homicide, such as manslaughter. Manslaughter is defined as murdering done without malice[note 1] and caused by reasonable provocation or reduced ability. Where it is acknowledged, involuntary manslaughter is a shooting that lacks all but the most diluted guilty purpose and carelessness.
Learn more about unlawful killing
https://brainly.com/question/28460818
#SPJ1
the governor appoints someone to the FREC then the Senate rejects the appointment, what happens next?
Through its advice and consent clause, the Appointments Clause grants the President the authority to propose candidates and grants the Senate full authority to accept or reject a nomination.
What happens once the governor names someone to the FREC and the Senate rejects that appointment?
The president appoints the governor of a state, who holds office for a five-year period at his discretion. The only people who may be appointed to this post are Indian citizens who are at least 35 years old. The Governor is vested with the power to serve as the state's executive.
appointment of governors A warrant designating the governor of a state must be signed and sealed by the President. Paragraph 156. Term of office for the governor: While the President is in office, the Governor will continue to function.
A power of appointment is an idea that has its roots in British common law. It is the ability under law to give another person ownership of a deceased person's property.
Learn more about appointment process:
https://brainly.com/question/29545676
#SPJ1
"KEEP RIGHT"
17. THIS SIGN MEANS:
A. Change lanes to the right
B. Drive to the right
C. Slower traffic should move to the right
What is the usual way to petition the government?
Clearly state the change you desire to see. Make this believable and specific. Send the demand to the appropriate parties, Include verifiable information and proof. Send your petition to the appropriate party.
What is petition?A petition is a formal court request that outlines the petitioner's account of the relevant facts and asks the court for an order.
After a lawsuit is filed, it goes through several stages before being concluded. In civil disputes, the plaintiff must first file a petition or complaint outlining the grounds for the litigation. The paperwork is delivered to the defendant together with a summons to court.
Both petitions and complaints are regarded as pleadings. A pleading is a legal declaration that presents one party's interpretation of the events.
Learn more about Petition, from:
brainly.com/question/549211
#SPJ1
Mr krabs went to the store
Answer:
yes he did
Explanation:
maybe
Answer:
and got money
Explanation:
You have just been appointed the Commissioner of Police for the city of New York. You know that there is a credible threat of terrorism and you must develop a policy that officers can follow to momentarily stop individuals, ask them some pertinent questions and then lightly frisk them to determine if they are concealing a weapon. You also know that the former police commissioner was strongly criticized for his stop-and-frisk policies, and the federal courts ruled they were unconstitutional because officers engaged in stop and frisk with a large number of black and Latino residents and far less white or Asian residents. Nonetheless, such a policy is an important tool in the fight against terrorism.
In no less than 200-words, describe how you would craft a new policy that allowed officers to determine if individuals were plotting terrorist acts or carrying concealed weapons.
When is it hardest to see motorcyclists?
a. Oncoming traffic, as when seen head on, they take up so little of your visual field.
b. On the freeway, as many people are changing lanes.
c. In the rear-view mirror, as they could easily be in your blind spot. You must check your blind spot.
d. All of the above are true. They are simply harder to see, and you must LOOK for them.
The hardest to see motorcyclists : All of the above are true. They are simply harder to see, and you must LOOK for them. Option D is the correct answer.
Motorcyclists can be difficult to see in various situations, and it is essential for drivers to be vigilant and actively look for them. Here's an explanation for each option:
a. Oncoming traffic, as when seen head-on, they take up so little of your visual field: Motorcycles have a narrower profile compared to other vehicles, making them less visible when approaching from the opposite direction. Due to their smaller size, they can be easily overlooked, especially if drivers are not actively scanning for them.
b. On the freeway, as many people are changing lanes: Motorcycles can be particularly challenging to spot on the freeway due to the high volume of traffic and frequent lane changes. The quick maneuverability of motorcycles allows them to navigate through traffic, but this also increases the risk of being overlooked by drivers who are not attentive or fail to check their blind spots before changing lanes.
c. In the rear-view mirror, as they could easily be in your blind spot. You must check your blind spot: Motorcycles can easily fall into a driver's blind spot, which is an area not visible in the rear-view or side mirrors. It is crucial for drivers to check their blind spots by turning their heads and using proper mirror adjustment to ensure they are aware of any motorcyclists in their vicinity.
Option D is the correct answer.
For such more question on motorcyclists:
https://brainly.com/question/27196118
#SPJ8
Power to shape policy and choose to accept or not to accept bills passed by congress. is which role of the priesident?
Answer:
Congress's power to overrule the President's veto forms a “balance” between the branches on the lawmaking power. The veto power does not give the President the power to amend/alter the content of legislation. The President only has the ability to accept or reject an entire act passed by Congress.
why does the earth go around the sun?
Answer:
Just as the Moon orbits the Earth because of the pull of Earth's gravity, the Earth orbits the Sun because of the pull of the Sun's gravity. ... But the gravity of the Sun alters its course, causing it to travel around the Sun, in a shape very near to a circle.
Explanation:
Answer:
becouse it orbit the sun by gravitational force
L1.3.4 Quiz: Productivity and Growth
Question 4 of 10
One major reason businesses seek investment is to:
O A. increase the opportunity cost of making new products.
B. give them the ability to ignore production possibilities cur
OC. reduce their need for consistent financial growth.
One major reason businesses seek investment is to Option B. boost their productivity by improving their inputs.
Investment can provide businesses with the capital needed to acquire new machinery and equipment, improve their production processes, and hire skilled workers. By investing in these areas, businesses can increase their efficiency and productivity, which can ultimately lead to increased profits.
Investment can also help businesses to expand their operations, enter new markets, and develop new products. These activities require significant amounts of capital, which may not be available from the company's own resources. Seeking investment from external sources such as venture capitalists, angel investors, or through public stock offerings can provide businesses with the funding they need to pursue these growth opportunities.
Additionally, seeking investment can help businesses to reduce their reliance on debt financing, which can be costly and risky. By raising capital through equity financing, businesses can avoid taking on additional debt, which can improve their creditworthiness and reduce their financial risk.
In summary, businesses seek investment to boost their productivity, expand their operations, develop new products, and reduce their reliance on debt financing. Investment can provide the capital needed to acquire new machinery and equipment, improve production processes, and hire skilled workers, which can ultimately lead to increased profits and long-term growth. Therefore, Option B is Correct.
The question was Incomplete, Find the full content below :
One major reason businesses seek investment is to:
A. increase the opportunity cost of making new products.
B. boost their productivity by improving their inputs.
C. give them the ability to ignore production possibilities curves.
D. reduce their need for consistent financial growth.
Know more about Investment here :
https://brainly.com/question/30700847
#SPJ11
HELP FAST PLEASE
i'll mark you brainliest
How do we investigate contemporary Supreme Court cases to understand and influence legal arguments and decisions?
Answer:
There are a few ways to investigate contemporary Supreme Court cases. One way is to read summaries of the cases from a variety of sources, including newspapers, legal journals, and online news sources. Another way is to read the full text of the Supreme Court opinion, which is available online on the court's website. Finally, it is also possible to watch or listen to audio recordings of the oral arguments in the case, which are also available on the court's website.
Give a potential reason for excluding from jury service the following people attorneys physicians and police officers
In the course of jury choice, capability jurors are excused "for reason" after they decide to discover that they cannot decide the case impartially. Independently, every facet may also work out a few constrained numbers of peremptory moves to excuse greater jurors without supplying a reason.
After considering capability jurors, each aspect's crook experts may assign high-quality jurors using varieties of annoying conditions: "for purpose" and "peremptory."
With the useful aid of difficult a juror, the lawyer is asking the determine to excuse that juror from the panel.
In the course of voir dire, the criminal experts may additionally moreover ask the selection to excuse a juror from sitting on the case this is called "difficult a juror". There are two forms of challenges: a venture for a purpose and a peremptory challenge.
Learn more about jury selection here: https://brainly.com/question/23497087
#SPJ1
a mental illness causing one to think falsely that there is a conspiracy and that somebody is out to kill them is called?
a] depression
b] malingering
c] psychosis
d] schizophrenia
Is it illegal to go to High School at 8:30 p.m. - 3:30 a.m. and start School Overnight, and Is it illegal to go to Church On non-Sundays?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
because no adults are there
Answer:
it is not illegal.
Explanation:
For the first part of the question, it is not illegal to go to high school at 8:30 p.m. - 3:30 a.m. if the school offers such an option and the student meets the attendance and academic requirements. However, most high schools in the US operate during regular daytime hours, usually between 7:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Some schools may offer alternative or flexible schedules for students who have special needs or circumstances, such as night school, online courses, or independent study. However, these options are usually limited and may not be available in every state or district.For the second part of the question, it is not illegal to go to church on non-Sundays if the church offers services or activities on other days of the week. Many churches have different programs and events throughout the week, such as Bible studies, prayer meetings, youth groups, or social gatherings . Some churches may also have services on Saturdays or other days that are considered holy or special by their denomination or tradition . However, some churches may only have services on Sundays or may require their members to attend on Sundays as part of their faith . Therefore, it is important to check with the church before attending on a non-Sunday.what are six sentencing choices that many state judges have?
Answer:
State judges in the United States have a range of sentencing choices available to them, which can vary based on the specific laws and guidelines of each state. While the exact options may differ, here are six common sentencing choices that many state judges have:
Incarceration: Judges can choose to impose a prison sentence, where the convicted individual is confined in a correctional facility for a specific period. The length of the sentence can vary based on the severity of the crime and other factors.
Probation: Instead of incarceration, judges may opt for probation, which allows the convicted individual to remain in the community under specific conditions. These conditions typically include regular check-ins with a probation officer, adherence to certain rules, and completion of any mandated programs or community service.
Fines: Judges can impose monetary fines as part of the sentence. The amount of the fine can vary depending on the offence and the financial situation of the convicted individual. Fines serve as a form of punishment and may also be used to compensate victims or cover court costs.
Restitution: In cases where the victim has suffered financial losses or damages, judges may order the convicted individual to pay restitution. This involves reimbursing the victim for medical expenses, property damage, or other financial losses resulting from the crime.
Community Service: Judges can order community service as part of the sentence, requiring the convicted individual to perform unpaid work for a specified number of hours within the community. Community service aims to provide a form of punishment, promote rehabilitation, and contribute to the community in a positive way.
Suspended Sentence: In certain cases, judges may choose to suspend the imposition of a sentence. This means that the convicted individual is not immediately incarcerated or subjected to other penalties. However, the judge may set specific conditions that the individual must meet, such as regular check-ins, completion of counselling or rehabilitation programs, or maintaining good behaviour. Failure to meet these conditions may result in the activation of the original sentence.
It's important to note that sentencing choices can vary among states and are influenced by factors such as the nature of the crime, criminal history, and the discretion of the judge within the bounds of applicable laws and sentencing guidelines.
hey, i hope that helped :)
could you pop me as brainliest pls :)
What is the impact of state versus private prisons.
Answer:
There are stark differences between public and private prisons. When it comes to overall comparisons, privately run prisons are often less likely to report data on inmate population, staffing, or where the budget was spent. The main difference between the two types of prisons comes down to money.
Each for-profit facility or institution houses people who violated the law. They are run by private, third-party companies rather than the state government, who runs traditional public prison. Private prisons receive their funding from government contracts and many of these contracts are based on the total number of inmates and their average length of time served
Explanation:
what are handle strikes
The supreme Court ruled in Miranda v Arizona that people:
Answer:
D) that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement
Explanation:
importance of the rule of law
Explanation:
The importance of the rule of law with these principles is self-evident. In our system, it is the fountain of goverance. Under the rule of law, citizens can live or work safely.Who is responsible for training workers on the use of PPE?
Select the best option.
Employee
Employer
Is it child labor if a parent forces their child to help them with work.
Is it also child labor if a parent makes a child do parent responsibilities like babysitting their sibling
Answer:
No
Explanation:
It's fine as long as they don't make you act like the parent like cooking food for the baby, bathing the sibling etc. then it isn't child labor.
the colonies were divided into regions name each of the regions and list the colonies that were part of each region. what did each regions economy consist of?
Answer:
The colonies in British North America were indeed divided into regions based on geographic proximity and shared characteristics. The three main regions were New England, the Middle Colonies, and the Southern Colonies. Here are the colonies that were part of each region, along with a brief description of their economies:
1. New England Colonies:
- Massachusetts Bay Colony (including present-day Massachusetts)
- New Hampshire
- Connecticut
- Rhode Island
The economy of the New England Colonies was primarily based on industries such as fishing, shipbuilding, trade, and manufacturing. The region had a long coastline and abundant natural resources, which supported the development of maritime activities. Additionally, the New England colonies engaged in subsistence farming, producing crops like corn, beans, and squash, although the rocky soil and short growing season limited agricultural success.
2. Middle Colonies:
- New York
- Pennsylvania
- New Jersey
- Delaware
The Middle Colonies had a diverse and varied economy. They were known as the "breadbasket" colonies due to their fertile soil, which supported extensive agriculture. The region grew crops such as wheat, barley, oats, and rye. The Middle Colonies also had a significant trading presence, with their ports serving as hubs for commerce and shipping. Manufacturing and industries such as iron production, textiles, and shipbuilding were also important economic activities in this region.
3. Southern Colonies:
- Virginia
- Maryland
- North Carolina
- South Carolina
- Georgia
The Southern Colonies' economy was predominantly based on agriculture, particularly the cultivation of cash crops. The region had a favorable climate and fertile land, which allowed for the large-scale production of crops like tobacco, rice, and indigo. Plantations, worked by enslaved labor, were central to the Southern economy. The Southern Colonies also engaged in some trade, primarily exporting their agricultural products.
It's important to note that these descriptions provide a general overview of each region's economy, and there were variations and nuances within each colony.
The colonies were divided into three main regions: New England, Middle Colonies, and Southern Colonies.
The list of the colonies that were part of each region:
1. New England Colonies:
2. Middle Colonies:
New YorkPennsylvaniaNew JerseyDelaware3. Southern Colonies:
MarylandVirginiaNorth CarolinaSouth CarolinaGeorgia
The economies of each region varied due to differences in climate, geography, and available resources.
1. New England Colonies:
Economy: The New England colonies had a diverse economy but were primarily centered around trade, fishing, shipbuilding, and maritime activities. They also engaged in subsistence farming and later developed manufacturing industries such as textiles.
2. Middle Colonies:
Economy: The Middle Colonies had a mixed economy, with a focus on agriculture, trade, and commerce. They were known as the "breadbasket" colonies due to their fertile land, which allowed for the cultivation of staple crops like wheat, corn, and oats. They also had thriving industries such as ironworks, lumbering, and manufacturing.
3. Southern Colonies:
Economy: The Southern Colonies had an agrarian economy heavily reliant on cash crops and plantation agriculture. They cultivated crops like tobacco, rice, indigo, and later cotton, using slave labor on large plantations. The export of these cash crops formed the backbone of their economy. They also had some trade and commerce, but agriculture dominated the Southern economy.
Know more about Colonies here:
https://brainly.com/question/32013798
#SPJ8
8. Which of the following would most decrease the amount of carbon dioxide in the air? A. a growing maple tree B. a running dog C. a person driving a car D. a burning forest
Which of the following personality traits is likely NOT consistent with a career as a police officer?
O communicative
O judgmental
O patient
O empathetic
What was the New jersey v TLO court case about
Answer:
In a juvenile court, T.L.O. argued that her Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures had been violated. The court sided with the school, and T.L.O. took her case to the New Jersey Supreme Court, which later found that the search was unreasonable and the evidence could not be used.
Explanation: