A capital felony conviction with an imposed death sentence, any felony criminal case is the type of district court verdict that is automatically and directly appealed to the Texas court of criminal appeals (bypassing the intermediate regional court of appeal).
What is a capital felony conviction?
Capital felony convictions are the most severe type of felony in Texas. If a person is convicted of a capital felony, defendants can be executed. If the prosecutor does not seek the death penalty, they can face whole life in jail. If the defendant is 18 years or over, that sentence is without the possibility of parole.
To know more about capital felony conviction:
https://brainly.com/question/9941104
#SPJ4
which of mendel's principles cannot be observed in a monohybrid cross?
All of Mendel's principles can be observed in a monohybrid cross.
A monohybrid cross involves the breeding of two individuals that differ in only one trait. For example, if one plant has yellow seeds and the other plant has green seeds, a monohybrid cross would involve breeding these two plants to produce offspring that either have yellow or green seeds.
Mendel's principles of inheritance, including segregation, independent assortment, and dominance, can all be observed in a monohybrid cross. These principles explain how traits are passed down from one generation to the next and how genetic variation arises in populations.
Therefore, none of Mendel's principles cannot be observed in a monohybrid cross.
To know more about Mendel's principles here
https://brainly.com/question/14401309
#SPJ4
Which statement best describes a want?
O A. A want is something that would be nice to have.
O
B. A want is something that will help you save money.
O C. A want is something that will help you attain a goal.
D. A want is something that is necessary for survival.
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
Eddy and Carl live in Benoni but decide to spend their December vacation at Umhlanga Rocks. Upon their arrival in Durban they hear that the beaches are closed as a result they are unable to swim. Eddy decides to stroll on the beach, while Carl went Mall hopping. Eddy finds a coin on the beach that is gold in colour. Assuming that the coin was a gold coin Eddy sells the coin for a large sum of money to Carl, who believes Eddy even after inspecting the coin. A few weeks later Carl discovers that the coin is brass and not gold as initially represented by Eddy
1.1. What type of mistake did Eddy commit in terms of South African Law of contract? Evaluate this type of mistake.
Eddy committed a mistake known as a "mistake as to the nature of the thing" in terms of South African law of contract. This mistake occurs when one of the parties to a contract is mistaken about the identity or nature of the subject matter of the contract.
What type of mistake did Eddy commit in terms of South African Law of contract?In this case, Eddy believed that the coin he found on the beach was a gold coin and represented it to Carl as such. Carl relied on Eddy's representation and bought the coin for a large sum of money. However, it turned out that the coin was not actually made of gold but rather brass. This mistake as to the nature of the thing is a type of mutual mistake, which means that both parties were under the same mistaken belief about the coin.
Under South African law, a contract can be set aside on the grounds of mistake if the mistake is material, i.e., it is so fundamental that it goes to the root of the contract. In this case, the mistake made by Eddy and Carl was a material one, as the identity and value of the coin was central to their agreement.
Therefore, Carl may have a valid claim to set aside the contract and demand a refund from Eddy.
Learn more about contract here:https://brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ1
Jose can't wait to buy his first car next month. He imagines that he will make several new friends at school since everyone will want to ride in his car. He is even having a hard time concentrating on filling orders at the restaurant where he works. Does Jose's thinking have an ethical component? Who is most affected by Jose's conduct? *
Answer:
no , jose Is Mostly effected because he is about to buy and As he is Having hard time filling orders He isn't doing his job properly which is affecting the consumers..And there is A high risk of losing job in the way he is hampering his Job to think
Jose the time thinking about the car, and time loses their job at the restaurant.
What is the restaurant?
A “restaurant” is a location where people eat food. Waiters offered services in the restaurant, and customers ordered food. People exchange services with the help of money. Customers are drawn in by the restaurant's atmosphere, service, and food. A restaurant is the provided the food with cleanliness and more hygiene.
Jose largely affected himself because he did not take care of the job. Jose was constantly concerned that the new car was not working well at her job. Most customers are hardly impacted. As a result, Jose was impacted whenever he lost his job at the restaurant.
As a result, Jose impacted himself because he all the time thinking for the new car. He was the not 100% concentrate her job are more chances to loss her restaurant job.
Learn more about the restaurant, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27316334
#SPJ2
which is not a federal cabinet department?
a. Homeland Security
b. veterans Affairs
c. Energy
d. Foreign Relations
Answer:
c
Explanation:
The 15 executive department heads make up the Cabinet, an advisory body. The members of the Cabinet are frequently the President's closest allies and are chosen by the President and ratified by the Senate.
Thus, Option C is correct.
Which three Cabinet roles are the most crucial?The vice president and the chiefs of the 15 executive departments make up the Cabinet today. There are currently seven additional posts that fall under the category of "cabinet-rank," including the White House chief of staff, EPA administrator, and US ambassador to the UN.
The four original Cabinet positions—Defense, State, Treasury, and Attorney General—remain the most crucial and are sometimes referred to as the "inner Cabinet," according to Andrew Rudalevige, a professor of government at Bowdoin College in Maine. These positions are also known as the "inner Cabinet."
For more information about federal cabinet department refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/11202591
#SPJ2
Microsleep is when you
Answer:
episodes of sleeping that last more than 30 seconds
Question 5 of
When you drive in the city, there is a lot going on. Which of the following a driver must do?
Answer:
The driver should focus on his driving, or there is a change of a car accident.
a policy-making process in which those with a numerical majority hold the authority is called
The policy-making process in which those with a numerical majority hold the authority is called a majoritarian democracy.
In a majoritarian democracy, the elected officials have the mandate to make decisions on behalf of the majority of voters. The political power is concentrated in the hands of the majority, and they have the authority to pass laws and policies that reflect their interests and values. The minority, on the other hand, has limited influence in the decision-making process, and their opinions may be ignored or overridden by the majority.
While majoritarian democracy can be effective in promoting stability and quick decision-making, it has some drawbacks. It can lead to the exclusion of minority voices and the suppression of dissent, which can undermine democratic values such as freedom of speech and pluralism. It can also lead to the tyranny of the majority, where the majority imposes its will on the minority, regardless of the consequences.
Overall, majoritarian democracy is one of the many forms of democracy that exist, and its effectiveness depends on the specific context in which it is implemented.
Know more about majoritarian democracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/29699972
#SPJ11
The _____ perspective of criminology encompasses Marxism, conflict, and feminist theories
a) Chicago
b) classical
c) conspiracy
d) critical
The correct perspective of criminology that encompasses Marxism, conflict, and feminist theories is the critical perspective. The critical perspective of criminology is a theoretical framework that seeks to analyze and critique the social structures and power dynamics that contribute to criminal behavior.
This perspective incorporates Marxist ideas about the role of economic and social inequality in criminal activity, conflict theories that focus on the struggle for power and resources within society, and feminist theories that examine the impact of gender and patriarchy on crime. The critical perspective also emphasizes the importance of examining the perspectives and experiences of marginalized and oppressed groups, such as women, people of color, and those living in poverty. Overall, the critical perspective seeks to understand the complex social, economic, and political factors that contribute to crime and to develop strategies for addressing these underlying issues in order to prevent crime and promote social justice.
To know more about criminology visit :
https://brainly.com/question/5137629
#SPJ11
In preparation for the grand opening of his new business Dave's Diet Delights, Dave
orders 1,000 pounds of assorted dietetic sweets. Two days before his scheduled
grand opening, his supplier ships 1,000 pounds of rich, high-calorie sweets by
mistake. As a result, Dave has to postpone his grand opening for a week (until the
right goods arrive) and, in addition, has to spend $500 for new advertising and
posters with the new grand opening day. He also has to pay one week's salary to 2
employees, who have nothing to do in that time since the goods for the store have
not arrived, for a total of $800. In addition, he spends $100 to ship the goods back
to the supplier a the nonconforming supplier's suggestion. After the right goods
finally arrive, he sues the supplier. What damages can he ask for, and what damages
is he likely to recover? Explain fully.
The damages that Dave can ask for in his suit to his supplier are:
Costs to re-advertise the big day Salaries for the workers Shipping costs to send the goods back Reputational loss for the postponing of the eventThe damages that Dave is likely to recover are:
Costs to re-advertise the big day Shipping costs to send the goods back Reputational loss for the postponing of the event What damages will Dave receive?Dave spent $500 to re - advertise the big opening which are costs that he would not have incurred if the supplier had sent the right sweets. He can therefore get back damages for this.
Dave also can sue for the shipping costs to the supplier because the supplier was at fault and if they weren't, Dave would not have to have spent $100 on the shipping costs.
There are also reputational damages from postponing an opening ceremony. Some people who would have come would no longer be interested either because they are now busy, or because they don't trust Dave any more.
Dave would also be allowed to sue for his worker costs but there is a chance he doesn't get this if the other side argues that it isn't guaranteed he would have had any sales in the two weeks he paid them.
Find out more on damages at https://brainly.com/question/21943000
#SPJ1
1. Think about the homeless elderly or the underprivileged children or the street animals or the exploitation of the environment or climate change or gender equality. Select any one challenge & chalk out a practical plan creatively as to how you will tackle it.
Answer:
Climate change :
Climate change, a very known fundamental in the 21 st century. The best way to tackle it is to go for strong powers of the world such as United nations organisation.
Strict decisions are needed to be made. As per the recent reports the carbon emissions has been increasing very quickly and western countries are the major source of it. Thus, it would first promote the use of electrical vehicles and will demote industries that emit such emissions.
One issue before the court in Vanegas v. American Energy Services case was:
a. whether AES would have failed had the original employees not continued their employment.
b. whether the employees who remained with AES were sufficiently compensated for their work.
c. whether AES was bound by a promise to pay at-will employees 5% of the value of the sale of the company if they continued their employment after the sale.
d. whether the sale of the company was contingent on the continued presence of the Vanegas and the other original employees.
The main issue before the court in the Vanegas v. American Energy Services case was whether AES was bound by a promise to pay at-will employees 5% of the value of the sale of the company if they continued their employment after the sale.
In the Vanegas v. American Energy Services case, the central question presented to the court was whether AES had an obligation to honor a promise made to at-will employees regarding a compensation arrangement tied to the sale of the company. The promise entailed that if the employees continued their employment after the sale, they would receive 5% of the company's value as compensation.
The court had to assess the validity and enforceability of this promise and determine whether AES was bound by it. Key considerations included the intent of the parties at the time the promise was made, the clarity of the promise's terms, and whether there were any conditions or contingencies attached to the promise.
Additionally, the court had to evaluate the nature of at-will employment and any potential implications on the enforceability of such a promise. This involved examining whether the promise altered the at-will employment relationship and whether adequate consideration was provided for the promise to be legally binding.
Ultimately, the court's decision revolved around the interpretation of the promise and its impact on the rights and obligations of both the employees and AES. The ruling had significant consequences for the parties involved and potentially set a precedent for similar cases involving promises made to at-will employees in the context of company sales or acquisitions.
In summary, the primary issue before the court in the Vanegas v. American Energy Services case was whether AES was bound by a promise to pay at-will employees 5% of the value of the sale of the company if they continued their employment after the sale. The court examined various factors, including the intent of the parties and the enforceability of promises in at-will employment relationships, to determine the validity and impact of the promise on the rights and obligations of the involved parties.
Learn more about employment here
https://brainly.com/question/1446509
#SPJ11
The issues in a campaign are?
a. a politician's printed advertisements.
b. the speeches.
c. the important
matters that the campaign
In the “Little Albert” experiment, psychologist John Watson conditioned a(n) ____________.
A.
lab rat to fear an infant
B.
infant to fear Santa Claus
C.
infant to fear a lab rat
D.
lab rat to fear loud noises
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Answer:
C. Infant to fear a lab rat
Explanation:
The Little Albert Experiment expressed that traditional conditioning the relationship of a particular incentive or behavior with an irrelevant incentive or behavior works in human beings. In the research, psychologist John Watson was able to condition an earlier unafraid baby to become afraid of a rat.
Please give Brainliest :)
Do defense teams have the ability to mount a defense against evidence? What affects their ability?
Answer:
Here's a sample answer:)
No, defense teams do not have the ability to defend against evidence. Usually, this is because there is not enough money or resources for them to use. This can also be affected by the type and/or amount of evidence presented. If there is undeniable evidence or an overwhelming amount of evidence it is very difficult to defend against such. Typically in this situation,the legal strategy to undermine the prosecution’s case is used.
Against this background consider the following set of facts:
In 2004 the Khumalos sold their farm to Peter and Jenny, a couple who are married in community
of property. There are two homesteads on the farm. A right of habitatio was reserved over the
smaller homestead on the farm in favour of the Khumalos for as long as they lived. This right
was duly registered against the title deed of the farm of Peter and Jenny. Peter and Jenny moved
into the bigger homestead but made life unbearable for the Khumalos. As a result of Peter and
Jenny’s ill-mannered behaviour the Khumalos decided to leave the smaller homestead in which
they lived. After a few years the Khumalos wish to return to the smaller homestead on the farm.
During an appointment with their attorney, the Khumalos described themselves as pensioners
who are struggling to make ends meet on their small state pension. The attorney promised to
consider their legal position and to provide them with and opinion, but the Khumalos decided to
return to the smaller homestead while Peter and Jenny were on holiday. Upon their return, Peter
and Jenny find the Khumalos in the smaller homestead. They were not impressed and decided
to make their lives unbearable again. Peter and Jenny decided that the smaller homestead
needs to be redeveloped for a period of two years. Their argument was that the homestead was
severely dilapidated and was extremely hazardous and uninhabitable to occupy. Many planning
and negotiations took place between Peter and Jenny and the Khumalos. At first, the Khumalo’s
refused because according to them there was nothing wrong with the state of the smaller
homestead.
The Khumalos eventually consented to the removal of the roof tiles and also to move out of the
smaller homestead, however they did not agree on the date on which they would be vacating
the homestead. Peter and Jenny assisted by private contractors removed the roof tiles while the
Khumalos were still inside. During this process most of the roof tiles cracked to such an extent
that that they could not be used again. The Khumalos realised that they have to move out of the
homestead immediately, although they were not satisfied to do so. After moving out, they
approach their attorney who advised them to institute the spoliation remedy immediately. The
Khumalos however inform the attorney that Peter and Jenny told them that they will not be
successful with the spoliation remedy since they agreed to move out of the homestead and
furthermore that it is impossible to restore control because the roof tiles were broken.
Against this background answer the following questions:
question 1
Is the spoliation remedy the correct or incorrect remedy for the Khumalos to institute against
Peter and Jenny to have their control of the smaller homestead restored? Motivate your answer.
question 2
Will the Khumalos succeed with the spoliation remedy? Keep in mind that they consented to the
removal of the roof tiles and to moving out of the homestead and that the roof tiles were
damaged. Fully substantiate your answer. In your answer refer to the requirements to succeed
with the spoliation remedy as well as the nature and purpose of the spoliation remedy. (7)
Explanation:
Answer to Question 1:
The spoliation remedy is the correct remedy for the Khumalos to institute against Peter and Jenny to have their control of the smaller homestead restored. The spoliation remedy is a legal action that a person can take to regain possession of property that has been taken from them unlawfully or through force. In this case, Peter and Jenny removed the roof tiles and thus deprived the Khumalos of their control of the smaller homestead without their consent. This amounts to spoliation, which is a violation of the Khumalos' possession rights. Therefore, the Khumalos have the right to institute the spoliation remedy to regain possession of the smaller homestead.
Answer to Question 2:
It is likely that the Khumalos will succeed with the spoliation remedy. The spoliation remedy is based on the principle that no person should be allowed to take the law into their own hands and that the courts will protect a person's possession rights. In order to succeed with the spoliation remedy, the Khumalos will have to prove the following:
They were in peaceful and undisturbed control of the smaller homestead before Peter and Jenny removed the roof tiles.
Peter and Jenny removed the roof tiles without their consent and thereby unlawfully deprived them of their control of the smaller homestead.
The Khumalos acted promptly in instituting the spoliation remedy once they became aware of the spoliation.
In this case, it is clear that the Khumalos were in peaceful and undisturbed control of the smaller homestead before Peter and Jenny removed the roof tiles. They did not consent to the removal of the roof tiles and were thus unlawfully deprived of their control of the smaller homestead. They also acted promptly in instituting the spoliation remedy once they became aware of the spoliation. Therefore, it is likely that they will succeed with the spoliation remedy.
The fact that the roof tiles were damaged may not be relevant to the Khumalos' right to regain control of the smaller homestead. The spoliation remedy is not concerned with the condition of the property that has been spoliated, but rather with the principle that possession should not be taken unlawfully. The nature and purpose of the spoliation remedy is to protect a person's possession rights and to prevent the unlawful taking of property.
when considering defense articles or services of u.s. origin to meet internal defense requirements, usg personnel should ensure partner nation counterparts have
Before providing defense articles or services of U.S. origin, USG personnel should thoroughly assess the authorization and capabilities of partner nation counterparts.
When considering defense articles or services of U.S. origin to meet internal defense requirements, U.S. government (USG) personnel should ensure that partner nation counterparts have:
1. The necessary authorization and approval from their own government to acquire and utilize such defense articles or services. This ensures that the procurement process is legally and politically supported within the partner nation.
2. Sufficient capabilities, infrastructure, and trained personnel to effectively operate and maintain the defense articles or services. This ensures that the resources provided by the USG are utilized effectively and contribute to the partner nation's defense capabilities.
These requirements are essential to ensure responsible and effective use of U.S. defense resources by partner nations. By verifying the authorization and capabilities of partner nation counterparts, the USG can mitigate potential risks associated with misuse, unauthorized transfers, or inadequate utilization of defense articles or services.
before providing defense articles or services of U.S. origin, USG personnel should thoroughly assess the authorization and capabilities of partner nation counterparts. This assessment ensures that the procurement process is legally supported and that the resources provided contribute effectively to the partner nation's defense requirements. By adhering to these considerations, the USG can foster responsible defense cooperation and enhance the security and stability of partner nations.
To know more about authorization follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/7088084
#SPJ11
Which Act is being violated when you post the private information of someone
on social media?
Right to privacy
Explanation by posting private information about someone on social media you are invading someone's personal life. It is there right to decide if they want to share there information or not
The act that is being violated when you post the private information of someone on social media is typically referred to as Privacy Act or Privacy Laws.
Privacy laws are designed to protect individuals' right to privacy and prevent the unauthorized disclosure of their personal information without their consent.
By posting someone's private information on social media without their permission, you are violating their right to privacy and potentially infringing upon applicable privacy laws and regulations. It is important to respect and uphold the privacy of individuals by refraining from sharing their private information without proper authorization.
To learn more about the privacy act:
brainly.com/question/31822745
if a mind reader reads another mindreaders mind whose mind are they reading
Answer:
Each other's minds(?)
But, perhaps, the second mindreader is not reading the first mindreader's mind, so, the first mindreader is reading the second mindreader's mind.That made no sense.I hope this helped at all.
guided reading activity congress at work lesson 1 how a bill becomes a law
A Bill is a draft statute that cannot become law without the support of both Houses of Parliament as well as the President of India. The legislative process begins with the introduction of a Bill in one of the two Houses of Parliament.
Most likely, your bank or credit union offers the finest free online bill payment option. Your financial institution probably provides free online bill payment if you have a checking account. When you pay with your bank, that bank starts the money transfer. Customers have the option to pay their bills online through digital banking by using the bill payment feature. The customer must make a variety of utility payments, including those for electricity, mobile, water, and other bills. For members, Bill Pay is free. A small price might be applied to some extra functions. What benefits may you get from using Bill Pay? o Bill Pay is straightforward to set up and use.
Learn more about Bill here
https://brainly.com/question/28603756
#SPJ4
URGENT 100 POINTS
Paralegals perform many of the same duties and tasks as lawyers, but they are not required to complete which of the following?
A.
attend training or receive certifications
B.
work with clients or draft documents
C.
attend law school or pass the bar exam
D.
learn about case or local laws
A paralegal is a professional who handles jobs that need some legal knowledge but not all of a lawyer's competence.
Thus, Option C is correct.
What Do Paralegals Do?The paralegal's work product is combined with and becomes a component of the attorney's work product for a client while being supervised by an attorney. It must be made clear that the paralegal is not a lawyer when speaking with clients and the general public.
Paralegals are not permitted to provide legal counsel or carry out any tasks that are only to be done by qualified attorneys. In a law firm context, the time spent on substantive legal work by a paralegal (as opposed to clerical or administrative labor) is billed to customers in a similar manner to that of an attorney, though at a lower hourly rate.
Although the paralegal profession began in law offices, paralegals now work in the majority of corporations and business organizations, including banks, insurance firms, and healthcare providers.
For more information about Paralegals refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/25507890
#SPJ2
in the case of any copyright subsisting in either its first or renewal term on january 1m 1978, other than a copyright in a work made for hire, the exclusive or nonexclusive grant of a transfer or license of the renewal copyright or any
The above paragraph is an excerpt from the judgement in the Copyright case of Community for Creative Non-Violence vs. Reid
The Community for Creative Non-Violence (CCNV) and sculptor James Reid came to an informal agreement for Reid to create a statue reflecting the condition of the homeless for a 1985 Christmas pageant in Washington, D.C. CCNV paid Reid the final payment of the agreed-upon fee upon the completion, delivery, and linking of the work to a base that it prepared independently. Soon later, the parties submitted opposing copyright claims pertaining to the sculpture. A district judge decided in favour of CCNV, finding that the statue qualified as a "work made for hire" under the Copyright Act of 1976. The Supreme Court granted CCNV certiorari after the Court of Appeals reversed itself on appeal.
To know more about work made for hire:
https://brainly.com/question/14615101
#SPJ4
Explain the impact of negligent misrepresentation on a contact.
Answer:
Misrepresentation is about giving of inaccurate information by one party (or their agent) to the other before the contract is made which induces them to make the contract. If a person makes a contract in reliance on misrepresentation and has to face loss as a result, they can revoke the contract or claim damages.
Explain the theory of natural law, including the major arguments provided
Using the Rule of 72, approximately how many years are needed to double a $100 investment when interest rates are 9.00 percent per year?
Answer:79
Explanation:because
Why is competition limited in an oligopoly?
In an oligopoly, the market is shared among a few firms. Competition is limited in an oligopoly for various reasons, which are explained below:
Interdependence: In an oligopoly, firms are interdependent on each other. Every firm's decision will affect the other firms' profits and market share. Therefore, firms have to consider their rival's responses before taking any action. Firms are not in a position to decide on the price of the product because the price is linked to the output of the industry.
Pricing strategies: Firms in an oligopoly focus on non-price competition, like product differentiation, branding, and advertising. Firms in an oligopoly tend to differentiate their products to create brand loyalty. This type of competition requires a significant amount of capital, which makes it hard for new entrants.
Barriers to entry: Firms in an oligopoly use several barriers to prevent new firms from entering the market. High capital costs, government regulations, and patents are some of the entry barriers used in oligopolistic markets.
Non-Price Competition: Firms in an oligopoly are not allowed to compete based on prices. Firms need to use different types of non-price competition to compete effectively. Product differentiation, research and development, advertising, and branding are some of the strategies used in an oligopoly to differentiate the products from their competitors'.Thus, competition is limited in an oligopoly because of the interdependence between the firms, non-price competition, entry barriers, and pricing strategies.
Know more about oligopoly here:
https://brainly.com/question/29518761
#SPJ8
Though high-profile business bankruptcies such as Sports Authority and Radio Shack dominate the news, over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals. T/F
It is a true statement that over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals.
What is bankruptcy filings?A bankruptcy filings is a procedure that help a person to discard their debt or makes a plan to repay their debts.
Bankrupted Individual debts are wiped out with your filing's court approval which can take a few months or may need continuous payments on those balances throughout the repayment plan.
In conclusion, It is a true statement that over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals.
Read more about bankruptcy filing
brainly.com/question/26392690
you are the judge. the prosecutor in a criminal case charges john with battery for hitting dan in the face with a swinging door. dan, the victim, is called as the only witness and testifies that john pushed the door open very fast. but then he adds that he does not believe that john knew he was on the other side of the door. shoudl you find john guilty of criminal battery on dan?
Because one of the criteria of the crime is intent to cause harm, John is not guilty of violence against Dan. There is no proof that John intended to strike Dan with the door in this instance.
There is no proof that John intended to strike Dan with the object in this instance. John is accused of battery in a court proceeding after slapping Dan in the face with a swinging door. Dan, the victim, is the only witness contacted, and he confirms that John pushed the door open quickly. Because one of the criteria of the crime is intent to inflict injury, John is not Really guilty of battery on Dan. No, since John had no intention of striking Dan.
learn more about criminal battery here:
https://brainly.com/question/18296514
#SPJ4
Your car must have two red taillights mounted on the rear visible from ______ feet