The statement "The supervising attorney should give legal advice to the client about how to minimize the tax burdens imposed on a decedent's estate, for example, by reducing the client's gross estate through lifetime gifts and increasing the potential deductions from the gross estate." is True as it is a part of their responsibilities to provide legal advice to their clients on how to minimize tax burdens on a decedent's estate.
This includes providing guidance on how to reduce the client's gross estate through lifetime gifts and increasing potential deductions from the gross estate. By doing so, the client can minimize estate taxes and ensure that their beneficiaries receive a larger share of the estate.
Additionally, the supervising attorney may also advise clients on other strategies to minimize tax burdens, such as establishing trusts or charitable giving. It is essential for attorneys to have a comprehensive understanding of estate tax laws and regulations to provide effective advice to their clients.
Failing to provide such advice could result in significant tax liabilities for the client and their beneficiaries. Therefore, supervising attorneys should make it a priority to provide clients with sound legal advice on minimizing tax burdens on a decedent's estate.
To know more about attorney refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14633987#
#SPJ11
country x has a parliamentary system with a 100-seat unicameral legislature. suppose that the conservative party won 45 seats in the most recent election, the moderate party won 30 seats, and the liberal party won 25 seats. the leader of the moderate party can become the prime minister b
The leader of the moderate party can become the prime minister.
Is it possible for the leader of the moderate party to become the prime minister?In a parliamentary system with a 100-seat unicameral legislature, the leader of the moderate party can indeed become the prime minister. Since no single party has an absolute majority of seats (more than 50%), forming a coalition government becomes necessary. In this scenario, the conservative party holds 45 seats, the moderate party holds 30 seats, and the liberal party holds 25 seats. The leader of the moderate party can negotiate with other parties, particularly the liberal party, to form a coalition government with a combined total of 55 seats. This coalition would have the majority required to support the leader of the moderate party in becoming the prime minister.
Parliamentary systems and coalition governments: In parliamentary systems, the prime minister is typically the leader of the political party or coalition that has the majority of seats in the legislature. However, in cases where no party has an outright majority, coalition governments are formed by multiple parties coming together to secure a majority. This allows smaller parties to play a significant role in the formation and functioning of the government. Coalition governments require negotiation, compromise, and consensus-building among different parties to maintain stability and govern effectively.
Learn more about prime minister
brainly.com/question/20412387
#SPJ11
What are some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities?
Some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities include the Jewish community during the Holocaust, Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps, and Indigenous peoples throughout colonization.
- The Jewish community during the Holocaust: During World War II, Jewish people were targeted by the Nazis and subjected to systematic genocide, forced labor, and mass extermination in concentration camps.
- Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps: Following the attack on Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans were unjustly perceived as a threat to national security and forcibly relocated to internment camps, where they faced harsh conditions and loss of personal freedom.
- Indigenous peoples throughout colonization: Indigenous communities around the world have faced marginalization, dispossession of land, cultural suppression, and discrimination due to colonial expansion and policies implemented by colonizing powers.
These examples demonstrate the experiences of discrete and insular minorities who have endured discrimination, persecution, and marginalization based on their ethnicity, religion, or cultural background. It is important to acknowledge these historical injustices to promote understanding, empathy, and the protection of human rights for all individuals, regardless of their minority status.
For more such questions on colonization, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/27868020
#SPJ8
Which crime is BEST represented by the following situation? Dagan sneaks into an event center through an unlocked window to steal valuable items on display for an event the next day.
Answer:
Theft
Explanation:
How have political parties contributed to the growth of women’s representation in Western European
parliaments? Discuss the reasons why some types of parties have more aggressively tried to raise their
number of women MPs than have other parties. Discuss how a country’s electoral system (proportional representation or single-member districts) influences its parties’ ability to increase female representation in parliament.
Gender equality and true democracy are fundamentally dependent on women's political engagement. It makes it easier for women to participate directly in public decision-making and provides a way to ensure that women are held more accountable.
What is the Electoral system?An electoral system is a system that determines how elections and referendums are conducted and how their results are determined.
Programs for mentoring and training help women develop their political abilities and get ready for political work. Regional Positions. Women who work in local government roles acquire the skills required for careers in regional and national politics as well as higher levels of public service.
Therefore, political parties contributed to the growth of women’s representation in Western European parliaments.
Learn more about the Electoral system, here;
https://brainly.com/question/20297176
#SPJ1
Why National Security is important? I will give u brainlist in your own words.
Answer:
National security is important because it's for the safety of the people living in a certain country, for them to be secured from any danger that might happen to them.
Explanation:
hope it helps you po.
1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that _____.
for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population
for every three slaves, five would be counted toward population
for every five slave owners, three slaves could be added to the total state population
for every three slave owners, five slaves could be added to the total state population
2. The Founding Fathers considered banning slavery in the Constitution, but instead chose to extend the slave trade for _____ years.
100
20
10
50
1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that a) for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population. 2. The Founding Fathers ultimately chose to extend the slave trade for another b. 20 years.
The three-fifths compromise was struck in 1787 by members of the Constitutional Convention. It called for the census of three-fifths of a state's enslaved population in order to determine the number of Representatives each state would have in Congress.
It also detailed the principles for allocating federal direct taxation and the number of electoral votes allotted to each state. In other words, states that legalized slavery could count 60% of their enslaved people, who were not citizens and could not vote, in determining the state's political representation in the national government.
The three-fifths agreement was part of a package of perks that included a twenty-year moratorium on any prohibition on slavery inserted into the Constitution to persuade people to vote.
To know more about Three-fifths Compromise:
https://brainly.com/question/27878011
#SPJ4
Correct question:
1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that _____.
a) for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population
b) for every three slaves, five would be counted toward population
c) for every five slave owners, three slaves could be added to the total state population
d) for every three slave owners, five slaves could be added to the total state population
2. The Founding Fathers considered banning slavery in the Constitution, but instead chose to extend the slave trade for _____ years.
a) 100
b) 20
c) 10
d) 50
- A court that does not typically hear original trials, but
whose opinions are regularly reviewed by other state courts is
likely to be a(n):
a)Trial Court
b)Civil Court
c) Intermediate Appellate Cour
C)A court that does not typically hear original trials, but whose opinions are regularly reviewed by other state courts is likely to be a(n) Intermediate Appellate Court
An intermediate appellate court is a court that does not typically hear original trials but focuses on reviewing the decisions and opinions of lower courts. Its primary function is to review and consider appeals from trial courts or lower appellate courts. The opinions rendered by an intermediate appellate court serve as guidance for other state courts, as they establish precedent and can influence future cases. These courts play a crucial role in the judicial system by ensuring consistency and uniformity in the interpretation and application of the law.
To read more about Intermediate Appellate Court click here
https://brainly.com/question/33718034
#SPJ11
Summarize the events that happened in New Jersey vs TLO. Include how it started and then how it ultimately ended.
Answer:
In a juvenile court, T.L.O. argued that her Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures had been violated. The court sided with the school, and T.L.O. took her case to the New Jersey Supreme Court, which later found that the search was unreasonable and the evidence could not be used.
Explanation:
M1 Analyse the
relationship between
ethics and the law in
terms of their relevance
to own professional
responsibilities as a
health or care
practitioner
Law and ethics in medicine both rest on the principles of self-determination, beneficence, and a concept of justice to be provided to all patients by both medical professionals and society.
Why do healthcare professionals in their line of work have a legal and ethical responsibility?Healthcare professionals have a legal and ethical responsibility to safeguard the individuals they look after. Patients suffer if these obligations are neglected. Healthcare practitioners could potentially face consequences for similar behaviours. Doing what is right for the patient is an example of ethical behaviour or obligation. Practitioners are obligated to abide by the codes of ethics for many healthcare professions.
Thus there is a close relationship between laws and ethics in healthcare workers to protect the patients and prevent the dismantling of the system.
Learn more about ethics, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11992384
#SPJ9
The excessive use of force in dealing with citizens is defined as:
a. Police misconduct
b. Police brutality
c. Police violence
d. Police mistreatment
Answer:
maybe the answer would be b
Answer:
Police brutality
Explanation:
Its also know for most abuse.
punishment of the probationer and protection of the community rehabilitation of the probationer and reintegration into the community punishment of the probationer and reintegration into the community rehabilitation of the probationer and protection of the community
In addition to the probationer's punishment and the community's protection, a probation that places a high priority on punishment may also involve the probationer's rehabilitation and reintegration into society.
What steps comprise the reintegration process?Reintegration is the process of transitioning from incarceration to a community, becoming accustomed to life from outside prison or jail, and making an attempt to live a life free of crime, as per our definition.
What are the highlights of probationary sentences with a community focus?Probationary sentences emphasize mentoring and participation in the community. Anyone who infringes against the rights of others ought to be punished or fined, according to the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines, the most popular set of sentencing laws in the United States.
What role does punishment play in the community?When punishment is used for revenge, incapacitation, or deterrence, it is permissible. The deterrence argument contends that if an offender is punished, both the perpetrator and those who emulate him will be deterred from committing other crimes.
Learn more about probation: https://brainly.com/question/14526197
#SPJ4
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) addresses clean air and water issues.
False
True
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Their orginization deals with health and safety of the work force
the most frequently discussed remedy in criminal procedure is:
The most frequently discussed remedy in criminal procedure is the exclusionary rule. This rule prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial, and its purpose is to deter police misconduct and protect the Fourth Amendment rights of individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, there is an ongoing debate about the scope and application of the exclusionary rule, as well as its effectiveness in achieving its intended goals.
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. The rule is based on the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.
If evidence is obtained in violation of a defendant's Fourth Amendment rights, the exclusionary rule provides that the evidence cannot be used against the defendant in court. This means that the prosecution cannot introduce the evidence to prove the defendant's guilt, and the evidence may not be used to obtain a confession or other incriminating statements.
The exclusionary rule is a key component of the criminal justice system, as it helps to protect the rights of defendants and prevent law enforcement officials from engaging in illegal or unconstitutional behaviour. However, the rule can also make it more difficult for prosecutors to obtain convictions in certain cases, and there is an ongoing debate over whether the rule strikes the right balance between protecting individual rights and ensuring public safety.
To know more about the exclusionary rule- https://brainly.com/question/30108382
#SPJ11
Franklin has been worried about how he’s going to be able to afford his rent if he becomes unemployed. Although he doesn’t normally worry about such things, it feels to him that it might be a distinct possibility given the number of layoffs that have been occurring at his company. Which of the following stressors best describes what Franklin has been experiencing?
A. role stressor
B. social stressor
C. traumatic event stressor
D. Career development stressor
Answer:
The answer should be... D: Career Development Stressor.
The stressors that best describes what Franklin has been experiencing is Career development stressor.
Career development stressorSetting up of career is one of the top stress for today's youth. Job stress is a type of stress and is caused by conditions in the workplace that negatively affect an individual’s performance and/or overall well-being of his body and mind.
Factors related to careerThese factors usually include working conditions, work overload and work under load both qualitative as well as quantitative, long hours, excessive travel, too many decisions, deadlines and time pressures.
Thus, the stressors that best describes what Franklin has been experiencing is Career development stressor.
Learn more aboout stress here- brainly.com/question/10566565
#SPJ2
Paul is the neighborhood Peeping Tom.At night he goes into Mary's backyard and peers through her bedroom window as she changes clothes.While Paul gains sexual gratification in watching Mary change clothes,he is also violating the ________ statute.
Answer: the statute depends upon the state you live in.
Suppose that Congress passes a law requiring employers to provide employees some benefit (such as healthcare) that raises the cost of an employee by $4 per hour.
a. What effect does this employer mandate have on the demand for labor? (In answering this and the following questions, be quantitative when you can.)
b. If employees place a value on this benefit exactly equal to its cost, what effect does this employer mandate have on the supply of labor?
c. If the wage can freely adjust to balance supply and demand, how does this law affect the wage and the level of employment? Are employers better or worse off? Are employees better or worse off
- The employer mandate decreases the demand for labor, leading to a decrease in the level of employment.
- The supply of labor is unaffected if employees value the mandated benefit exactly equal to its cost.
- The wage rate will decrease to offset the increased labor cost, and both employers and employees may be worse off, depending on the specific circumstances.
a. The employer mandate, which raises the cost of an employee by $4 per hour, will have a negative effect on the demand for labor. Employers will be less willing to hire additional workers or maintain the same level of employment because it becomes more expensive to do so.
The increase in labor cost due to the employer mandate raises the overall cost of hiring employees. Employers will compare this increased cost with the marginal benefit they receive from hiring additional workers. If the cost of hiring exceeds the benefit, employers will reduce their demand for labor.
b. If employees place a value on the benefit equal to its cost, the employer mandate will not have a direct effect on the supply of labor.
When employees place a value on the benefit exactly equal to its cost, they are indifferent to its provision. Therefore, their decision to supply labor is not influenced by the mandate. The supply of labor will depend on other factors such as individual preferences, wage rates, and alternative job opportunities.
c. If the wage can freely adjust to balance supply and demand, the employer mandate will lead to a decrease in the wage rate and a lower level of employment. Employers are worse off, while employees may be worse off or experience no significant change.
When the cost of employing workers increases due to the mandate, employers will try to minimize their costs by reducing the wage rate. A lower wage rate will incentivize some workers to exit the labor market or seek alternative employment, reducing the level of employment. The wage rate will adjust to a new equilibrium where the increased labor cost is offset by a lower wage rate.
To know more about employment ,visit;
https://brainly.com/question/27404382
#SPJ11
except when necessary for takeoff or landing or unless otherwise authorized by the administrator, the minimum altitude for ifr flight is ________
Except when necessary for takeoff or landing or unless otherwise authorized by the administrator, the minimum altitude for IFR flight is 2000 feet above the highest obstacle over designated mountainous terrain and 1000 feet above the highest obstacle over terrain elsewhere.
What is IFR flight?
Instrument flight rules (IFR) and visual flight rules are the two sets of rules in aviation that control all facets of aircraft operations in civil aviation (VFR).
IFR is described as follows in the Instrument Flying Handbook published by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA): "The FAA has created rules and regulations to control flight when it is unsafe to use outside visual guidance. IFR flight relies on the use of the flight deck's instruments, and navigation is carried out via electronic signals." Additionally, pilots and controllers use it to denote the kind of flight plan an aircraft is following, such as an IFR or VFR flight plan.
To study more about IFR
https://brainly.com/question/29582662
#SPJ4
What is the importance of a standard measurement for all? Subject: HELE Grade 4
We require a common unit of measurement to increase the accuracy and dependability of our judgement.
What purpose does standard measurement serve?For proper dealing, measurement should be uniform across the board. As a result, measurement should be consistent. We require a common set of measurement units, known as standard units, for the sake of uniformity.
Children can simultaneously improve their understanding of numbers and measurements through the use of measurement. Encourage kids to line up their units end to end because gaps or overlaps will lead to inaccurate measurements. In addition to teaching measurement with objects, estimation is a useful skill to teach.
To know about standard measurement visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13245866
#SPJ1
In which of the following ways do utilitarians and Aristotle stand united against Rawls’s liberalism? a) Utilitarians and Aristotle believe in natural rights, whereas Rawlsian liberals are concerned mostly with liberty. b) Utilitarians and Aristotle both believe that the government should attempt to maximize the aggregate of pleasure minus pain, whereas Rawlsian believe that the government should simply protect rights. c) Utilitarians and Aristotle start by asking what things are good and then argue that the government should advance the good, whereas Rawlsian liberals believe that the government should not advance any particular conception of the good. d) a and c e) b and c
Answer:
b) Utilitarians and Aristotle both believe that the government should attempt to maximize the aggregate of pleasure minus pain, whereas Rawlsian believe that the government should simply protect rights.
Explanation:
Utilitarians believe that the interest of government should be the same as that of the people, the reason is that, as a whole, the greatest liberty of people is a function of the welfare the people wish to enjoy, and this eads to the possibility and the desirability of progressive social change through peaceful political processes.
At the same time, Aristotle believe that government should govern for the general good or interest of the people, he concluded that, a kind of constitutional democracy, is the most ideal, as it sought for general interest of the people, in which rich and poor respect each other’s rights and the best-qualified citizens rule with the consent of all.
On the contrary, Rawls Liberalism believe that government should only uphold what is ideal, by balancing what is right with justice. According to him, government should protect the citizens, but not necessarily giving in to the aggregate pleasure of the people, that is, doing what is right, which will be supported by reasonable people as against what is considered good.
Hence, Utilitarians and Aristotle both believe that the government should attempt to maximize the aggregate of pleasure minus pain, whereas Rawlsian believe that the government should simply protect rights.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Which of the following are local issues that escalated into national issues? how much time working parents need to have to care for their children not having anyone to take care of a new child in the family
how often trash pick-up should occur
not having rules or regulations set for using dog parks
how many people should be elected to the city council
Answer:
no idea. b
Explanation:
sorry i dont no
One of the seven principles of the North American Model for Wildlife
Conservation states that wildlife is an international resource. What does this
mean?
A
Wildlife found in the United States and
Canada is owned by North Americans,
B
Dead game animals may be sold throughout
North American without being regulated.
C
Hunting and fishing are managed
cooperatively across state and province
boundaries.
D
Only those persons who have a valid
passport may hunt legally.
lo
Answer:
C Hunting and fishing are managed cooperatively across state and province boundaries.Explanation:
According to the North American Model for Wildlife Conservation, wildlife is a an international resource. No party has exclusive right over it and, therefore, should be shared across state and province boundaries.It advocates that hunting and fishing should be open and free to all citizen regardless of status, or land ownership. However, it also advocates that these activities should be practiced within legal limits and not for commercial purposes.Considering the North American Model for Wildlife.
Conservation states that wildlife is an international resource. This implies that "Hunting and fishing are managed cooperatively across state and province boundaries."This conservation of wildlife deals with the management of the wildlife such that there wouldn't be the extinction of wildlife animals.Also, being international, means, such management should be done beyond individual boundaries of States and provinces across North America, including the United States, Canada, and Mexico.Hence, in this case, the correct answer is option C "Hunting and fishing are managed cooperatively across state and province boundaries."
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/6333981
Finley wants to make as many people happy as possible. He steals from a greedy ceo in order to give money to a large number of peiple. Which philosophy of ethics is applicable. Social justice virtue kantianism utilitRanism
Answer:
Utilitarianism.
Explanation:
Utilitarianism is a term or philosophy of ethics that describes the belief or view that, an action is considered morally right if it resulted in goodness, more pleasure, or happiness than bad, pain, or unhappiness.
Hence, in this case, Finley believes, stealing in itself is neither bad nor good; what renders it bad or good is the effects it generates. Thus, stealing from a greedy CEO, whom he believes has less need for the money, and gives the money to a large number of people whom he thinks to need money can be justified based on the calculation that the benefits of the theft outweigh the losses caused by the theft.
Therefore, the right answer is UTILITARIANISM
Why has the Texas Ethics Commission (TEC) faced severe criticism over its enforcement of campaign laws?
The Texas Ethics Commission (TEC) has faced severe criticism over its enforcement of campaign laws due to several reasons.
One of the primary concerns raised by critics is the perceived lack of effectiveness and efficiency in the TEC's enforcement actions. Critics argue that the TEC has failed to adequately investigate and penalize violations of campaign laws, leading to a sense of impunity among those who may be engaging in questionable campaign practices. The commission has been criticized for being slow in processing complaints and for its limited resources, which may hinder its ability to thoroughly investigate and take appropriate actions.
Another point of criticism is the perception of political influence or bias within the TEC. Some argue that the commission is susceptible to political pressures or that its members may have affiliations or loyalties that compromise their objectivity. This raises concerns about the impartiality and fairness of the enforcement process, undermining public trust in the TEC's ability to regulate campaign finance and ethics.
Furthermore, there have been criticisms regarding the transparency and accountability of the TEC's actions. Critics claim that the commission's decision-making processes lack transparency, making it difficult for the public to understand the rationale behind its enforcement actions. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the perceived leniency of penalties imposed by the TEC, with critics arguing that they may not serve as sufficient deterrents for potential violators.
The complexity and ambiguity of campaign finance laws in Texas have also contributed to the criticism faced by the TEC. Some argue that the laws themselves are convoluted and open to interpretation, creating challenges for consistent enforcement. The lack of clear guidance and the complexity of reporting requirements can create confusion among candidates, political committees, and donors, leading to unintentional violations that are then subject to TEC scrutiny.
Overall, the severe criticism faced by the Texas Ethics Commission over its enforcement of campaign laws stems from concerns regarding its effectiveness, perceived political influence or bias, transparency, and the complexity of campaign finance laws. Addressing these concerns and ensuring a more robust and fair enforcement process will be essential for rebuilding public trust in the TEC's ability to uphold ethical standards and enforce campaign finance regulations effectively.
Learn more about Texas Ethics Commission here
https://brainly.com/question/14318950
#SPJ11
Write 3 situations for each amendment the bill of rights in which a police officer would need knowledge his or her job properly, and a short explanation as why this amendment is important to police work.
Answer:
The First Amendment protects the rights to freedom of speech, religion, and the press, as well as the right to peaceably assemble and petition the government. For police officers, knowledge of these rights is important in situations where individuals are exercising their First Amendment rights, such as during a protest or demonstration. In these situations, police officers must ensure that individuals are able to exercise their rights without infringing on the rights of others, and must also be prepared to respond to any potential public safety concerns. This amendment is important to police work because it helps to ensure that individuals are able to express their views and opinions without fear of retribution, and allows the police to maintain public order and safety.The Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms. For police officers, knowledge of this amendment is important in situations where individuals are carrying firearms, whether openly or concealed. In these situations, police officers must be aware of the laws and regulations governing the possession and use of firearms, and must be prepared to respond to any potential threats to public safety. This amendment is important to police work because it helps to ensure that individuals are able to exercise their right to bear arms while also promoting public safety.The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. For police officers, knowledge of this amendment is important in situations where they are conducting searches or making arrests. In these situations, police officers must have probable cause to believe that an individual has committed a crime in order to conduct a search or make an arrest, and must also have a warrant if the search or arrest would otherwise be considered unreasonable. This amendment is important to police work because it helps to ensure that individuals are protected from arbitrary or unlawful searches and seizures, and promotes transparency and accountability in law enforcement.T/F: negative punishment and negative reinforcement have the same impact on behavior.
It is False that negative punishment and negative reinforcement do not have the same impact on behavior. Negative punishment and negative reinforcement are two types of operant conditioning that are utilized in behavior modification.
Negative punishment occurs when an individual's behavior is decreased by the removal of a desired stimulus. Negative reinforcement occurs when an individual's behavior is increased by the removal of an aversive stimulus. Negative punishment is an effective way to decrease undesirable behavior. This occurs when a desirable stimulus is removed. For example, when a child throws a temper tantrum in a grocery store, a parent may remove the child's toy or put them in timeout. This removal of a desired stimulus, in turn, decreases the child's undesirable behavior.
Negative reinforcement is an effective way to increase desirable behavior. This occurs when an aversive stimulus is removed. For example, a rat that learns to press a lever in order to turn off a loud noise is demonstrating negative reinforcement. The rat learns that by performing a particular behavior, it can avoid an aversive stimulus. Therefore, negative punishment and negative reinforcement do not have the same impact on behavior, as they are two different types of operant conditioning with different effects.
to know about negative reinforcement visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29663095
#SPJ11
When a commercial real estate sale has two Agent sales associates the broker may create a?
When a commercial real estate sale involves two agent sales associates working under a broker, the broker may create a co-brokerage agreement or a dual agency arrangement.
A co-brokerage agreement is a contractual agreement between two real estate brokers, each representing different parties involved in a transaction. In this case, the broker representing the seller and the broker representing the buyer collaborate to facilitate the sale. The agreement outlines the responsibilities, duties, and compensation arrangement between the two brokers.
Under a co-brokerage agreement, the brokers typically share information, work together to market the property, coordinate showings, negotiate terms, and assist in the closing process. The agreement specifies how the commission will be divided between the brokers, typically based on a predetermined percentage or a negotiated split.
On the other hand, a dual agency arrangement occurs when the broker represents both the buyer and the seller in a transaction. In this scenario, the broker acts as a neutral intermediary, facilitating the transaction while maintaining impartiality.
know more about intermediary here:
https://brainly.com/question/29732040
#SPJ8
The pattern of behavior typical of a particular offender committing a specific crime
is known as which of the following?
Answer:
"MO (Modus Operandi)" is the appropriate choice.
Explanation:
This seems to be a distinct pattern and sometimes mode of activity that in upwards of yet another felony demonstrates or appears to demonstrate the work of something like a particular suspect. It is clearly conceptual and therefore is rooted in what seems like a small-scale understand exactly-how that's been well recognized.. Justices are known as important political ______________________________.
Answer:
Officials.
Explanation:
A justice is the official who exercises judicial power, either alone or as part of a multi-member body. The powers, duties, manner of appointment, discipline and training of justices vary widely between different jurisdictions. The justice must conduct the trial impartially and, usually, in an open court. The justice hears all the witnesses and any other evidence presented by the lawyers of the case, evaluates the credibility and arguments of the parties and then issues a decision on the matter based on the interpretation of the law and their personal judgment. In some jurisdictions, the power of the justice may be shared with a jury.
Devon is accused of robbing a jewelry store and summarily thrown in jail. Which law or principle of law will help Devon in this situation?
Answer: most likely Procedural Due Process
Explanation:
and if they dong evidence that he stole u can also file for false accusation which can be used when a claim or allegation of wrongdoing that is untrue and/or otherwise unsupported by facts.
At the heart of the police subculture is the obligation of support and loyalty to other police officers.
True
False
Answer:
The answer is True!
Explanation:
Because, A police officer have to gain trust! just like everyday people.
Answer:
True
"Once accepted into the ranks of the police, an individual is introduced to the police subculture, which is a set of norms and values governing police behavior. One of the reasons why this subculture exists is due to the danger, stress, and isolation that are common in police work. Recruits learn these values and norms starting in the training that they receive at police academies. They learn not only the formal rules about policing but also the informal ones that are expected by others in this subculture. At the heart of the police subculture is the obligation of support and loyalty to other police officers. Other aspects that also play a role are group solidarity, honor, and respect for police authority."