Answers
The state supreme court has Appellate jurisdiction. The best illustration is, a politician is charged with stealing finances from a department in the executive branch.
Jurisdiction is the legal term for the legal authority granted to a legal reality to legislate justice. Appellate jurisdiction includes the power to reverse or modify the lower court's decision.
Appellate governance exists for both civil law and criminal law. In an appellate case, the party that appealed the lower court's decision is called the appellate, and the other party is the user.
The Supreme Court has also a genuinely wide appellate governance over all Courts and Bars in India is as important as it may, in its discretion, entitlement special leave to appeal under Composition 136 of the Constitution from any judgment, decree, determination, judgment, or order in any cause or matter passed or made by any Court.
To know more about Appellate jurisdiction,
brainly.com/question/1250183
brainly.com/question/29562739
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Se encarga de vigilar y evaluar el ejercicio del gasto público, para lo cual realiza actos de fiscalización, con la finalidad de consolidar un gobierno de transparencia y honestidad
Answers
Answer:
Auditor General.
Explanation:
Un auditor es una persona que realiza una auditoría y verifica, mediante cuestionamiento, observación y escucha, cómo se está desarrollando una persona u organización y si se están cumpliendo las especificaciones financieras y legales que le son exigibles. Así, el Auditor General de Gobierno es el funcionario público que controla el estado financiero de las entidades de la administración pública, así como también lleva a cabo la fiscalización y control de cada acto particular que es realizado por el gobierno.
The United States is on par with Russia in having more persons per capita in prison. Is that a sign that the United States is a nation that enforces its laws, or is it an
indication that something is inherently wrong with its criminal justice system? Please explain and then respond to a
Answers
According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.
What is criminal?
The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.
According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.
Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.
Learn more about on criminal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ1
Pleas explain the difference between Compensatory Damages and Punitive damages and provide examples.
Answers
Compensatory damages are intended to compensate the plaintiff for losses or damages suffered as a result of the defendant's actions, while punitive damages are intended to punish the defendant for their wrongful conduct.
Compensatory damages are awarded to the plaintiff to compensate for their actual losses or damages. These damages can include medical expenses, lost wages, property damage, and pain and suffering. The goal of compensatory damages is to make the plaintiff whole again and to put them in the same position they would have been in had the wrongful conduct not occurred.
Punitive damages, on the other hand, are awarded to punish the defendant for their wrongful conduct and to deter similar conduct in the future. Punitive damages are only awarded in cases where the defendant's conduct was particularly egregious or malicious.
Unlike compensatory damages, punitive damages are not tied to the plaintiff's actual losses or damages. Instead, they are meant to send a message to the defendant and others that this type of conduct will not be tolerated.
Learn more about plaintiff
brainly.com/question/32345700
#SPJ11
list and define the six general categories of crime and give an example of each.
Answers
The six general categories of crime include personal crimes (assault, murder), property crimes (theft, arson), inchoate crimes (attempted robbery, conspiracy), financial crimes (fraud, money laundering), statutory crimes (drug possession, traffic violations), and cybercrimes (hacking, phishing). These categories encompass a wide range of offenses involving harm to individuals, property, financial systems, incomplete crimes, violations of specific laws, and illegal activities conducted through digital means.
The six general categories of crime are:
Personal Crimes: These involve direct harm or threat to an individual. Examples include assault, robbery, murder, or domestic violence.Property Crimes: These crimes target someone's property or belongings. Examples include burglary, theft, arson, or vandalism.Inchoate Crimes: These are incomplete or anticipatory crimes. Examples include attempted robbery, solicitation of a crime, or conspiracy.Financial Crimes: These involve illegal activities related to money or finances. Examples include fraud, money laundering, embezzlement, or identity theft.Statutory Crimes: These are offenses that violate specific laws or statutes. Examples include traffic violations, drug possession, tax evasion, or public intoxication.Cybercrimes: These crimes are committed using computer networks or digital devices. Examples include hacking, phishing, online fraud, or cyberstalking.To know more about cybercrimes refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/32375073
#SPJ11
how case law and statutory law are interrelated
Answers
Answer:
Common law is defined as law that has been developed on the basis of preceding rulings by judges. Statutory laws are written laws passed by legislature and government of a country and those which have been accepted by the society.
Explanation:
1.) Describe an economic problem the government in America is trying to solve. What solution to this public policy issue do you think would work best?
2.) Explain why this policy would be the best solution using Sowell's three questions.
3.) Why is your proposed solution the best response to this issue?
4.) What is the cost of your proposed solution?
ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is there evidence (statistics or statements from experts) from a credible source that shows your proposed solution would work? Remember you can use the Helpful Links tab on our class homepage.
Answers
An economic issue the government in America is trying to handle is the problem the inflation. The solution that can be used to combat it is called contractionary monetary policy.
A rise in the nation's unemployment rate could be a cost of implementing contractionary monetary policy.
What is the most effective strategy for reducing inflation in the economy?Implementing a contractionary monetary policy is a common method of controlling inflation. A contractionary policy aims to lower the amount of money available in an economy by reducing bond prices and boosting interest rates. Price declines, as well as slower inflation, and less consumption follow as a result.
One crucial monetary strategy to fight inflation is to manage the flow of money through the economy. If the money supply shrinks, prices will rise and demand will decrease.
Note that Another method of reducing the amount of money in circulation is when the government bans certain coins or denominations of paper money. As a result of the economic slowdown and decreasing production, businesses hire fewer personnel.
Learn more about Raising inflation from
https://brainly.com/question/8149429
#SPJ1
the following legal description contains how many acres: the south 1/2 of the se 1/4 of the nw 1/4 of the ne 1/4 of section 7
Answers
The legal description provided represents acres of land located in Section 7.
The legal description provided can be broken down into several parts, each indicating a specific area within a section of land.
Starting from the outermost description, we see that this land is located in Section 7. A section of land is one square mile or 640 acres. Therefore, Section 7 initially consists of 640 acres.
Moving inward, the next description is the "ne 1/4" which stands for the northeast quarter of the section. A quarter of a section is equal to 160 acres. Therefore, the northeast quarter of Section 7 initially consists of 160 acres.
The next description is the "nw 1/4" which stands for the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 7. Since a quarter of 160 acres is 40 acres, the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter is equal to 40 acres.
Next, we have the "se 1/4" which stands for the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 7. Therefore, the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter is equal to 10 acres.
Finally, we have the "south 1/2" which stands for half of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 7. Therefore, the south 1/2 of the se 1/4 of the nw 1/4 of the ne 1/4 of Section 7 is equal to 5 acres.
In summary, the legal description provided represents 5 acres of land located in Section 7.
For more question on "Land Located in Section 7" :
https://brainly.com/question/14414648
#SPJ11
Part of analyzing a political cartoon is deciding whether or not you agree with its message. What is the BEST reason to include this in your analysis?
A.
The artist is attempting to persuade you to like his art.
B.
The artist is attempting to provoke humor about a political topic.
C.
The artist is attempting to provoke thought about a political topic.
D.
The artist is attempting to gain readers in many newspapers.
Answers
Answer:
The artist is attempting to provoke thought about a political topic.
Answer:
C
Explanation: Already did it and got it correct.
Select the correct answer. Which country has a comparative advantage for producing cups? Units of Cups Produced per Hour per Worker Units of Plates Produced per Hour per Worker India 15 10 France 8 9 Japan 7 7 Canada 6 9 A. Canada B. France C. India D. Japan Reset Next
Answers
The country which has a comparative advantage for producing cups is India. As a result the best choice is C.
To establish whether country has a comparative advantage in producing cups, we must evaluate each country's productivity levels in terms of cups produced per hour per worker.
Let's look at the data:
15 cups per hour per worker in India
8 cups per hour per worker in France
7 glasses per hour per worker in Japan
6 cups per hour per worker in Canada
When we compare cup production rates, we observe that India has the highest productivity, with 15 cups produced per hour per worker. France comes in second with 8 cups, Japan comes in third with 7 cups, and Canada comes in third with 6 cups.
When compared to the other countries listed, India has a comparative advantage in making cups because it can create the most cups per hour per worker.
For such more question on comparative:
https://brainly.com/question/30483794
#SPJ11
susan brings a lawsuit against houston hospital for harm to her knee as a result of surgery. what is the most likely cause of action for the wrong that was committed?
Answers
Susan brings a lawsuit against Houston Hospital for wrongfully damaging her knee during surgery. Tort is this wrongful act called.
A tort is a civil wrong that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the tortious act's perpetrator. Tort law is distinct from criminal law, which deals with criminal wrongs punishable by the state. While criminal law seeks to punish those who commit crimes, tort law seeks to compensate those who are harmed as a result of the actions of others.
In countries where the civil and criminal legal systems are separate, some wrongful acts, such as assault and battery, can result in both a civil lawsuit and a criminal prosecution.
Learn more about tort
https://brainly.com/question/14614720
#SPJ4
Full QuestionL:Susan brings a lawsuit against Houston Hospital for wrongfully damaging her knee during surgery. What is this wrongful act called?
A: Libel
B: Tort
C: Slander
D: Assault
Police response to crime during loadshedding example burglary, shoplifting etc
Answers
During load shedding, police response to crimes such as burglary and shoplifting can be affected due to the lack of electricity. With power outages, the visibility of police officers can be significantly reduced, making it more challenging to respond to incidents and detect criminal activity. Additionally, load shedding may also impact the communication and response times of the police force, particularly if their communication systems rely on electricity.
To address these challenges, police departments may need to adapt their strategies during load shedding periods. This could include increasing patrols in areas with a high likelihood of criminal activity or using alternative communication methods, such as handheld radios or satellite phones. Furthermore, police departments could work with local communities to increase awareness of crime prevention measures, such as improving lighting and securing property during power outages.
Overall, while load shedding may present challenges for police response to crime, proactive measures and community engagement can help mitigate the impact and ensure public safety.
White colored fibers from fabrics appear in Uv light
Answers
White colored fibers from fabrics may appear fluorescent under ultraviolet (UV) light.
This phenomenon is known as fluorescence, which is the emission of light by a substance that has absorbed light or other electromagnetic radiation of a different wavelength.
Fluorescence occurs when the UV light excites the electrons in the molecules of the fabric fibers, causing them to jump to higher energy levels. When these electrons return to their original energy level, they release the excess energy in the form of light, which is typically visible as a glow or fluorescence.
Many fabrics, including cotton, nylon, polyester, and silk, contain compounds that can exhibit fluorescence under UV light. However, the intensity and color of the fluorescence can vary depending on the type of fabric and the specific compounds present.
learn more about electrons here :
https://brainly.com/question/12001116
#SPJ11
llanhon
Lame an
F
RS, ADA AND WAIVERS
1. The nature and scope of one's property Interest in a trademark generally is the right to prevent
consumer confusion. U
2. Rights in a registered trademark exist indefinitely as long as the mark continues to be used.
3. Public policy dictates that in the United States free market capitalist system, any entrepreneur may
profit by registering a domain name (cybersquatting) that is confusingly similar to a registered or
unregistered mark, or dilutes, a famous mark without liability.
т
Jotes' Lanhamn Act and State
4. Endorsements of Olympic athletes allow the ability of that particular company to advertise using
images of the Olympic flame.
prp.
v. Jurch Publishing, Inc
bserved:
5. The broadcast of the NCAA Men's Basketball tournament and the Final Four championship is
copyrightable and only the owners of the copyright are allowed to have access.
6. Players generally have copyright ownership of their individual play, because they are the "author of
the work" -- without their performance on the field there wouldn't be a game to broadcast. DF
7. The trademark laws are put in place to protect more the public rather than the trademark. BD
8. A waiver is a contract that releases an organization from liability for harms caused by ordinary
negligence in exchange for the ability to participate in an activity.
Otection under the Lanham
untenable claim. ETW aks
talking trademark. Images
nark because they do not
not distingunh and identify
irk because there are unde
ken by countless photograph
hich have been published in
it the world. No reasonable
do.
F
9. Waivers never hold up in the court of law.
F
v. Maomillan, Inc., 894
fledged that "lu]nder vor
trademark -- if, for ex
ecific goods."
10. A parent who signs a waiver for their child has signed away the right of the child to sue.
T
11. An athlete with a disability will always have a claim to participate as the Supreme Court has
determined that sport is a major life activity.
F
Organize all these with which answers do you think it's right and correct them need this ASAP
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Jotes’ Lanhamn Act and State
4. Endorsements of Olympic athletes allow the ability of that particular company to advertise using
images of the Olympic flame.
prp.
v. Jurch Publishing, Inc
bserved:
5. The broadcast of the NCAA Men’s Basketball tournament and the Final Four championship is
copyrightable and only the owners of the copyright are allowed to have access.
6. Players generally have copyright ownership of their individual play, because they are the “author of
the work” — without their performance on the field there wouldn’t be a game to broadcast. DF
What did John Adams mean when he said that the United States was “a nation of laws and not men”? Write two or three sentences for your answer.
Answers
Answer:
What he meant was that we are a nation of laws that means we have laws to fallow not men. This was keeping from people Ruling and being powerful.
Explanation:
The Iron Law of Prohibition states that the stricter and more intense the enforcement of the laws against recreational drug use. state true/false.
Answers
False. The Iron Law of Prohibition is a term coined by Richard Cowan in 1986, which states that "the more intense the law enforcement, the more potent the prohibited substance becomes."
This means that as law enforcement efforts against drug use become stricter, the drugs become more potent, dangerous, and profitable, leading to a range of negative consequences such as increased violence, corruption, and public health risks.
The Iron Law of Prohibition does not state that the stricter and more intense the enforcement of laws against recreational drug use, the more effective they will be in reducing drug use. In fact, there is much evidence to suggest that strict enforcement measures, such as mandatory minimum sentences and aggressive policing tactics, can have negative consequences and may not be effective in reducing drug use or addressing drug-related problems.
Learn more about law enforcement here:
https://brainly.com/question/10253135
#SPJ11
i need help with this.
Answers
Answer:
D. Carrying of concealed weapons
The legal system that is applied uniformly and based on the accumulated rulings of judges over time is called the _____ law tradition.Choose matching definitiona. Substantiveb. Constitutionalc. Civild. Common
Answers
The Common law tradition refers to a legal system that is implemented evenly and is founded on the cumulative judgments of judges throughout time. Hence, the correct option is Common.
What exactly is a legal system?The legal system is made up of laws, processes, and institutions that allow public and private projects to be lawfully carried out. In other words, it is a system for legal interpretation and enforcement. It outlines the rights and responsibilities in a variety of ways.
Legal systems can be divided into groups or patterns that share specific characteristics. You may encounter the following major groups: 1) common law, 2) civil law, 3) religious law, and 4) customary law.
To learn more about the legal system, click
https://brainly.com/question/1894269
#SPJ4
3.) What is the difference between criminal law and civil law?
Answers
Answer:
hope it helps.stay safe healthy and happy.
Which bureau contains the Board of Real Estate Brokers and Salespeople?
Answers
Answer: I believe it is the Bureau of U.S. Labor Statistics
Explanation:
What are two reasons the Supreme Court focuses on private conferences
Answers
Please answer this......
When will America make us require in this year, microchip implanted in humans in 2020-2021?
Answers
Answer:
america will not force us to get the microchips but they might give us the option in 2011
Explanation:
When changing lanes, the acronym describing the correct procedure is as follows:
A. SMOG - Signal, Mirror, Over the Shoulder and Go
B. SCAT - Signal, Check, Accelerate and Turn
C. SMAT - Signal, Mirror, Accelerate and Turn
OD. STAM - Signal, Turn, Accelerate and Mirror
Answers
Answer: The answer is A
Explanation:
What conflict exists when an mco provides bonuses to physicians for providing fewer tests
Answers
A conflicts of Interest & Accountability can occur when a when a MCOs provides bonuses to physicians for providing fewer tests.
What is the role of the MCOs?The Managed Care Organizations is an entity that provides financial incentives such as bonuses to physicians for reducing the number of tests, treatments and referrals to hospitals and specialists.
Therefore, the conflicts of Interest & Accountability can occur when a when a MCOs provides bonuses to physicians for providing fewer tests.
Read more about MCOs
brainly.com/question/27034009
#SPJ1
Courts look at parties outward manifestations of intent as a requirement to enforce a contract. This is called the subjective theory of intent. True False
Answers
False. The statement provided is incorrect. Courts look at parties' outward manifestations of intent as a requirement to enforce a contract.
That is actually referred to as the objective theory of intent. The objective theory of intent focuses on the external, observable actions and communications of the parties involved in a contract, rather than their internal thoughts or intentions. This approach helps courts determine whether a reasonable person would perceive an agreement to have been made, considering the circumstances.
The subjective theory of intent, on the other hand, focuses on the internal, unexpressed intentions of the parties. However, this theory is generally not used by courts to enforce contracts, as it would be difficult and impractical to determine the true intentions of each party involved in a contract dispute.
In summary, the objective theory of intent, which examines the outward manifestations of the parties, is the approach used by courts to enforce contracts, not the subjective theory of intent.
Learn more about Courts :
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ11
Write a 5-6 sentence paragraph to express how the rights listed above would protect Dominic from the crime he has been accused of. This should be done on a separate piece of line paper.
Dominic is an African American man who lives with his White roommate Keith. Dominic comes home one day and the police are waiting for him with Keith. The police went into his home and found evidence implicating him, from what they have said, in stealing a car that has gone missing. The police immediately blame Dominic and arrest him, taking his car as well. Dominic waits two years in prison, not being allowed to leave, until he is finally given a trial with police members as the jury. At the trial, Dominic argues for himself that he did not do and that there is no proof. He is declared innocent, but the police later bring him back and declare him guilty of the crime, declaring his punishment that he can never go within ten feet of a car again.
Within this scenario, there are TEN different violations of due process rights from the different amendments. For your paragraph, you can reflect on the following to meet your requirements:
List three rights violated here.
Explain how these three rights were violated.
Describe how using his rights would have helped Dominic in this situatio
Answers
Answer:
Dominic's rights to an impartial jury, a prompt trial, the presumption of innocence, and immunity from double jeopardy would all apply in this case. Dominic would be shielded by these rights from unjust treatment and punishment by the criminal justice system. His right to a speedy and fair trial would appear to have been violated given that he was imprisoned for two years before being tried and that the police served as the jury in his case. Additionally, it would appear that his right to be shielded from double jeopardy was being violated given that he was initially found innocent at his trial but later found guilty of the same crime.
Explanation:
I waited for my dad to come back from the store to get milk its been 18 years what happened to him
Answers
Answer:
I am sorry that this has happened however he is not going to come back. Most likely cause he dislikes you. :)
Explanation:
solon’s idea of democracy (demoskratica) was based on… a. Ruled based on the rich making all the rules like kings. b. Ruled based on representation, a senate, which made laws. c. Ruled based on individual votes, where commoners voted on laws, wars, and foreign policy for the city. d. Ruled based on universal suffrage (everyone votes)
Answers
Answer:
c. Ruled based on individual votes, where commoners voted on laws, wars, and foreign policy for the city.
Explanation:
Solon’s idea of democracy was based on c. Ruled based on individual votes, where commoners voted on laws, wars, and foreign policy for the city. Solon was an ancient Athenian statesman and lawmaker who introduced democratic reforms in the sixth century BCE. He created the concept of the Boule, or Council of 400, which was made up of common citizens and had a say in passing laws and advising the assembly. Additionally, Solon abolished debt slavery and reformed the laws to make them more accessible and transparent to ordinary people.
The images show what happened to two people who invested $1,000.
Gale starts with $1,000.
Gale's investments:
- Savings account: $200,1% retum
- Mutual fund: $600, 7% return
- Stock:
$200, -10% return
Alex starts with $1,000.
Alex's investments:
- Stock:
$1,000, -10%
return
Value one year later:
Profit:
$1,024
$24
Value one year later:
Profit:
$900
($100)
Which investment advice would Gale most likely give to Alex?
Answers
The investment advice that Gale most likely to Alex is to invest in Mutual funds, as an investment in mutual funds will have a better return than any other investment.
What are mutual funds?A mutual fund is an organization that brings collectively cash from many human beings and invests it in stocks, bonds, or different properties.
The mixed holdings of stocks, bonds, or different properties the fund owns are called its portfolio.
Hence, The investment advice that Gale most likely to Alex is to invest in Mutual funds, as an investment in mutual funds will have a better return than any other investment.
learn more about mutual funds here:
https://brainly.com/question/3151209
#SPJ5
The best investing advice Gale would probably provide Alex is to put money into mutual funds since they will yield a higher return than other types of investments.
What is mutual fund?A mutual fund is a business that pools the money from several investors and uses it to buy stocks, bonds, or other types of real estate. The portfolio of the fund refers to its assortment of stocks, bonds, and various real estate interests.
The primary investments of mutual funds are frequently categorized as money market funds, bond or fixed income funds, stock or equity funds, or hybrid funds. Index funds, which are passively managed funds that follow the performance of an index, are another classification for funds. As a result, Gale will probably advise Alex to invest in mutual funds since they will yield a higher return than any other type of investment.
Learn more about mutual funds here:
https://brainly.com/question/31417979
#SPJ7
Probably the full options are:
A. mutual fund
B. natural resources
C. government bonds
D. certificate of deposit
3. What is the best defensive driving technique for driving in wind?
A. Using a high gear
B. Driving with your low-beams on
C. Driving at slower speeds
D. Using cover braking technique
Answers
I Promise it's worth a lot of points
Mock Trial
identify and summarize each of the following individual role.
plaintiff + defendant
lawyers
witnesses
judge
jury
Write a 1 To 2 Paragraph exploring what the conversation may have been while the jury was deliberating. what did they discuss? How did they reach a conclusion?
Answers
defendant - In a civil suit, the person complained against; in a criminal case, the person accused of the crime.
A lawyer (also called attorney, counsel, or counselor) is a licensed professional who advises and represents others in legal matter
witness - A person called upon by either side in a lawsuit to give testimony before the court or jury.
judge - Government official with authority to decide lawsuits brought before courts. Judicial officers of the Supreme Court and the highest court in each state are called justices.
jury - Persons selected according to law and sworn to inquire into and declare a verdict on matters of fact. State court juries can be as small as six jurors in some cases. Federal juries for civil suits must have six jurors criminal suits must have twelve.
Trial
After many weeks or months of preparation, the prosecutor is ready for the most important part of his job: the trial. The trial is a structured process where the facts of a case are presented to a jury, and they decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the charge offered. During trial, the prosecutor uses witnesses and evidence to prove to the jury that the defendant committed the crime(s). The defendant, represented by an attorney, also tells his side of the story using witnesses and evidence.
In a trial, the judge — the impartial person in charge of the trial — decides what evidence can be shown to the jury. A judge is similar to a referee in a game, they are not there to play for one side or the other but to make sure the entire process is played fairly.
Jury Instructions
Following the closing arguments, the judge “charges the jury,” or informs them of the appropriate law and of what they must do to reach a verdict.
Jury Deliberations & Announcement of the Verdict
After being charged, the jury goes into deliberation, the process of deciding whether a defendant is guilty or not guilty. During this process, no one associated with the trial can contact the jury without the judges and lawyers. If the jury has a question on the law, they must write a note to the judge, which the judge will read in court with all parties present. In federal criminal trials, the jury must reach a unanimous decision in order to convict the defendant.
After they reach an agreement on a verdict, they notify the judge, the lawyers, and the defendant in open court. Everyone is present in court for the reading of the verdict. The United States Marshals Service is present during trial to protect the judge and prosecutors from potential harm. If the defendant is found not guilty, they are usually free to go home.