The process of ensuring a care provider has the proper qualifications to practice medicine before granting him privileges, contracting with him as part of a managed care plan, or hiring him in a medical practice is called credentialing.
Credentialing is the process of determining a qualified medical professional's qualifications and evaluating their history and reliability.
Credentialing is the process of determining a person's knowledge, ability, or performance level in order to issue a designation, such as a certificate or license. Credentialing is a formal process used in the healthcare business that follows a set of rules to guarantee that patients receive the finest care from healthcare professionals who have undergone the most rigorous examination on their eligibility to practice medicine.
Many healthcare organizations and provider networks handle their own credentialing, usually through an electronic service or a credentialing specialist, with approval from a credentialing committee. Allied health staff membership and the granting and reviewing of particular clinical privileges may fall under this category.
Learn more about credentialing here: https://brainly.com/question/17011621
#SPJ4
What are the three possible Cases Of trable concurrence
Answer: At common law, crimes required not only an actus reus and a mens rea but concurrence of the two. Through use of scenarios involving the common law crimes of murder, robbery, burglary and larceny (which are briefly introduced), the requirements for concurrence are explored.
Explanation:
sorry that this is late...
In the United States, a court case involving the ownership of a patent would be heard by which court?
State or the Supreme Court
Federal only
Federal or state
State only
Answer: the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Patent case appeals are heard by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) (see Question 1, Order of precedence). The US Supreme Court hears appeals from the CAFC on a discretionary basis.
Explanation:
Federal only i think
why am i going to prison i am only 17 years old i got 20 years
A 17-year-old person can be sentenced to 20 years for committing one of the most serious crimes.
What is a heinous crime?A heinous crime is a misconduct that involves some form of personal injury or death committed by a minor who has passed the age of discretion.
Some of the most prominent crimes that attract a long sentence in jail include:
M.rderForcible r.peS.xual assaultR.bberyFirst-degree ars.n.Thus, a 17-year-old person can be sentenced to 20 years for committing one of the most serious crimes, especially when it results in serious injury or death.
Learn more about serious crimes at https://brainly.com/question/25973385
when legislators want to reduce the risks to health and the environment the least governmental control over industrial activities can be achieved through
When legislators want to reduce risks to health and the environment, the least governmental control over industrial activities can be achieved through a combination of regulations and market-based incentives.
Regulations, such as emission limits and pollution standards, set minimum requirements for companies to meet in order to reduce their impact on the environment and public health. Market-based incentives, on the other hand, provide economic incentives for companies to voluntarily reduce their environmental impact. Examples of market-based incentives include carbon taxes, cap and trade systems, and green bonds.
While regulations can be effective in reducing environmental risks, they can also be costly and burdensome for companies. Market-based incentives, however, can encourage innovation and efficiency, while also providing economic benefits.
By combining these two approaches, legislators can strike a balance between reducing environmental risks and minimizing government control over industrial activities. Ultimately, the key to success is finding the right mix of regulations and incentives that motivates companies to prioritize environmental responsibility without compromising their competitiveness.
To know more about environment refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30821114#
#SPJ11
All the following are true regarding the circular flow model EXCEPT
a. businesses sell goods and services in the product market
b. individuals supply resources in the resource market
c. the government buys goods and services in the product market
d. businesses sell resources in the product market
All the following are true regarding the circular flow model EXCEPT businesses sell goods and services in the product market. Thus the correct option is A.
What is the circular flow model?The circular flow model shows the supply of funds in society. Money is sent back to and from producers and employees in the form of wages and payments for goods.
Determining how money circulates within an industry is the central goal of the model of circular flow. It separates the economy into its two main sectors, namely, households and corporations.
The circular flow model offers one method for illuminating the relationships between various economic sectors. The interconnections between the various sectors' flows of money, products and services, production inputs, and income are represented.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about the circular flow model, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11324259
#SPJ2
What issues can be transferred to the program integrity department if requested
The issues that can be transferred to this department may differ depending on the organization's specific policies, industry, and regulatory environment.
in the context of an organization or company, the program integrity department typically deals with ensuring compliance, preventing fraud, and maintaining the integrity of programs or processes. the specific issues that can be transferred to the program integrity department may vary depending on the nature of the organization and its operations. here are some examples of issues that could be handled by a program integrity department:
1. fraudulent activities: reports or suspicions of fraud, including financial fraud, identity theft, or any form of deceptive practices that undermine the organization's programs or operations.
2. compliance violations: instances where individuals or entities fail to adhere to regulatory requirements, policies, or standards set by the organization or external governing bodies.
3. abuse or misuse of resources: cases involving the unauthorized use or misappropriation of company assets, such as funds, equipment, or confidential information.
4. unethical conduct: reports of unethical behavior, conflicts of interest, or breaches of professional standards that could compromise the integrity of the organization's programs.
5. data breaches or security incidents: any breaches or suspected breaches of data security or privacy that could potentially compromise sensitive information or violate applicable laws or regulations.
6. misconduct or violations related to programs: any actions or behavior that undermine the effectiveness or integrity of specific programs or initiatives implemented by the organization.
it's important to note that the specific responsibilities and areas of focus of a program integrity department can vary across organizations.
Learn more about financial here:
https://brainly.com/question/28319639
#SPJ11
patty principal fired al agent because al had been careless in his record keeping and had comingled personal and business funds. unless patty notifies the third parties who dealt with al that he is no longer her agent, al will continue to have authority and patty will be bound by his actions.
Patty Principal fired Al Agent because Al had been careless in his record keeping and had comingled personal and business funds. Unless Patty notifies the third parties who dealt with Al that he is no longer her agent, Al will continue to have apparent authority and Patty will be bound by his actions.
The type of authority that Al will continue to have depends on the circumstances of his relationship with Patty and the way he presented himself to third parties.
First, it's important to understand that there are four types of authority in agency law: actual authority, apparent authority, implied authority, and incidental authority.
Actual authority refers to the express or implied powers that the principal grants to the agent. Apparent authority arises when the principal creates the appearance of authority in the agent's actions, even if the principal did not actually grant that authority.
Implied authority refers to the powers that are necessary or customary for the agent to carry out the principal's express or apparent instructions. Incidental authority refers to the powers that are incidental to the agent's express or implied authority.
In this case, Patty would be bound by Al's actions if he continues to act as her agent, even though she fired him. In summary, if Patty does not notify third parties that Al is no longer her agent, then Al may continue to have apparent authority and Patty will be bound by his actions.
However, if Patty properly terminates Al's actual and apparent authority, then Al will no longer be able to act on her behalf, regardless of any remaining implied or incidental authority.
For more question on "Apparent Authority" :
https://brainly.com/question/29893631
#SPJ11
Complete Question
Patty Principal fired Al Agent because Al had been careless in his record keeping and had comingled personal and business funds. Unless Patty notifies the third parties who dealt with Al that he is no longer her agent, Al will continue to have __________authority and Patty will be bound by his actions.
implied
incidental
actual
apparent
Nkombe and smet classification of African philosophy strengths and weaknesses
An attempt is made to classify the various philosophical traditions that exist on the African continent using the Nkombe and Smet classification of African philosophy.
Strengths and weaknesses of African philosophy as classified by Nkombe and Smet?This classification system's recognition of the diversity of African philosophy and the various factors that have shaped it, including colonialism and cultural exchange, is one of its main advantages. Additionally, it enables a more nuanced comprehension of the various philosophical traditions and their individual contributions to the subject. The classification system, according to some critics, can be constrictive, reinforce stereotypes, or essentialize particular philosophical traditions. The process of classifying philosophies can also be subjective and may not fully reflect the nuanced differences between each tradition.
To Know more about Nkombe and Smet Visit:
brainly.com/question/31344636
#SPJ1
What is the Nkombe and smet classification of African philosophy? What are its strengths and weaknesses?
what is the name of the war in which at least one participant is a nonstate actor?
The name of the war in which at least one participant is a nonstate actor is Extrastate war.
What is extra-state conflict?
Extra-state conflict occurs when a state (a member of the international community) engages in political activity with an unrecognized state. Outside of the state's borders that the international community recognizes, this kind of war may occur.
Interstate wars are part of a process of "bargaining " between and among nation-states that also involves voluntary and forced migrations, as well as the definition and re-drawing of boundaries. ... Interstate wars have occurred periodically in the Middle East in recent decades and are likely to continue to occur.
Learn more about Extra-state https://brainly.com/question/14195324
#SPJ4
The European Union is an example of which of the following?
A. A tax
B. A trade agreement
C. A law
D. A statute
Answer:
A trade agreement
Explanation:
Answer:
B. A trade agreement
Explanation:
the authors state that governmental policy does not necessarily reflect the interests—indeed, the welfare—of the public, even though it is intended to do so. which is not a reason given for this
There could be several reasons why government policy may not necessarily reflect the interests or welfare of the public, even if it is intended to do so.
One possible reason is that politicians and policymakers may have their own personal interests or biases that influence their decision-making, which may not align with those of the public. Additionally, political parties and special interest groups may have a significant influence on the policy-making process, often prioritizing their own interests over the broader public interest. Another reason could be the inherent complexity of policymaking, which can involve balancing multiple competing interests and priorities, making it difficult to fully satisfy everyone. Finally, limited resources and budget constraints may force policymakers to make difficult choices that may not always align with the interests of the public. Ultimately, the reasons why governmental policy may not always reflect the interests or welfare of the public are complex and multifaceted, and require careful consideration and analysis to fully understand.
Learn more about government :
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ11
which of the following is not a basis for personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant in a child support case
A) The nonresident has traveled through the state on many occasions
B) In the past, the nonresident had sexual intercourse in the state and the child may have been conceived by that act.
C) In the past, the nonresident resided with the child in the state
D) The nonresident is personally served within the state
Answer:
a
Explanation: it makes sense
Which of the following would NOT be considered a civic responsibility?
A.
voting
B.
serving on a committee
C.
obeying the law
D.
volunteering
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Answer:
C. Obeying the law
Explanation:
A civic responsibility is something you should do to be a good citizen, meaning you should do them but you don't have to. Obeying the law on a other hand, is something you HAVE to do or you get punished. Hope this helps!
_ is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false
imprisonment, in which someone is restrained by another without
consent and without any lawful right to do so.
The criminal equivalent of the civil tort known as false imprisonment is called "Unlawful Restraint" or "Unlawful Detention." Unlawful restraint occurs when one person intentionally restricts the freedom and movement of another individual without their consent and without any legal justification or authority to do so. It involves confining or restraining someone against their will, restricting their liberty and freedom of movement.
The key elements of unlawful restraint in criminal law are similar to those in the civil tort of false imprisonment. These elements include the intentional act of restraining someone, the lack of consent from the person being restrained, and the absence of any lawful authority or justification for the restraint. The act must involve a significant interference with the individual's liberty, such as physically restraining them, confining them to a specific space, or preventing them from leaving a particular area.
Unlawful restraint is considered a criminal offense because it violates an individual's fundamental right to personal liberty and freedom of movement. It is generally treated as a misdemeanor or a lower-level offense, although the severity of the offense and the potential penalties can vary depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances.
It is important to note that unlawful restraint is a distinct criminal offense separate from other crimes involving confinement or restraint, such as kidnapping or false imprisonment. While the elements of these offenses may overlap to some extent, unlawful restraint specifically focuses on situations where an individual is unlawfully restrained without consent and without any lawful authority to do so.
In summary, unlawful restraint is the criminal equivalent of the civil tort of false imprisonment. It involves intentionally restraining someone without their consent and without any legal right to do so. This offense infringes upon an individual's freedom of movement and personal liberty, and it is considered a criminal offense punishable under the law.
To know more about Movement visit-
brainly.com/question/11223271
#SPJ11
The physiological effects of marijuana greatly differ from those associated with alcohol.
True
Or
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
alcohol is a depressant and marijuana is a stimulant
Define price ceiling and floor amd give am example for each. Which leads to a surplus? Why?
Answer:
A price ceiling prevents a price from rising above a certain level. Hence, the name price "ceiling". If the price is set below the equilibrium price what results is the quantity demanded will exceed the quantity supplied. Two things will be achieved either the excess in "demand" and "shortages" will ensue. Whereas, the price floor prevents the price from plummeting below a certain level or threshold.
Explanation:
Price Ceiling and Price Floors prevent the price from going either up or down.
*Please note that this not a legal or "law" related question. This is an Economics Social Science one.
How does the Supreme Court determine whether or not to hear a case?
Answer:
The Supreme Court is the highest court of all the land. There is much discretion, involving a lengthy process for a case to be accepted within this prestigious Court. Much like the President vetoing or accepting a bill to become a law. You see, the Supreme Court determines to hear a case through a unison of votes from at least four Justices. This vote is known as the "Rule of Four". They will review everything from the case's background to how well the case would withstand during the trial. In order to do so, they read the petition for certiorari. Before doing any of this, however, you will need to, of course, file a lawsuit within your district. I wish you luck if you are attempting to bring your case to the supremacy.
Which president signed the Community Mental Health Centers Act in order to
deinstitutionalize the mentally ill?
Answer:
Signed into law by President John F. Kennedy on October 31, 1963, the Act was the first of several federal policy changes that helped spark a major transformation of the public mental health system by shifting resources away from large institutions towards community-based mental health treatment programs
Explanation:
Hope it helps
the theory of absolute advantage suggests that under free, unregulated trade, each nation should specialize in producing those goods it can produce most efficiently, based on naturally occurring endowments such as minerals.
The Wealth of Nations from the 18th century, economist Adam Smith introduced the idea of absolute advantage to explain how nations might profit from trade by specializing in producing and exporting the things that they can manufacture more successfully than other nations.
What is Absolute Advantage ?Comparative advantage, which occurs when a producer has a lower opportunity cost to provide a good or service than another producer, can be contrasted with absolute advantage.
The potential advantages that a person, investor, or company forgoes by selecting one alternative over another are known as opportunity costs.
Only when each producer has an absolute advantage over the other in producing a particular good does absolute advantage result in clear profits from specialization and trade.
Learn more about Absolute Advantage ,from :
brainly.com/question/28287819
#SPJ1
(15)
4.3 Explain how you, as a correctional official, would ensure that you maintain external and
internal security at all times.
Answer: Protection
If a prisoner has concerns for their safety they can be placed in protection, a special area of the prison that is separated from mainstream prisoners.
Prisoners can ask to be put on a protection order, or the General Manager of the prison may choose to put a prisoner on one based on information received. A protection order does not limit the prisoner’s access to family visits or programs.
The prisoner subject to the request must be safeguarded from the when the request is received, until an assessment of the request is complete. Assessments should be completed within seven days.
If the threat is substantiated there are several options available including:
mediated discussions with staff, the prisoner needing protection and the perceived aggressor
the transfer of either the prisoner needing protection or the perceived aggressor or
the prisoner needing protection is placed in Protective Custody.
Explanation:
what is vicarious liability in tort ?
Answer:
Vicarious liability in tort involves holding a particular entity responsible for any wrong doing . The entity may not necessarily be the one who committed it.
The entity bears the consequences and brunt of such tortious actions which may vary from accidents to loss or damage of certain goods and services. The entity is the one who pays the compensations or other forms of reliefs to the victims of the tortious actions.
Which of the following guidelines should a supervisor follow to create and maintain a harassment-free workplace? (Select all that apply.)
A.
Know, publicize and enforce the district’s sexual-harassment policy and complaint procedure.
B.
Identify potential problems and address them promptly.
C.
Address only confirmed incidents of sexual harassment.
D.
Help resolve issues that stem from sexual-harassment acts and allegations.
E.
Serve as a role model to others.
Answer:
A. Know, publicize and enforce the district’s sexual-harassment policy and complaint procedure.
D.Help resolve issues that stem from sexual-harassment acts and allegations.
Explanation:
For a supervisor to have a harassment-free workplace, he would be most wise to follow these two steps listed which are publicizing the district’s anti-harassment policy and how to properly complain.
The next step would be to help resolve issues that stem from sexual harassment, both the deeds and allegations.
A pharmaceutical company wants to test a new drug that supposedly helps control palpitations in people with high-blood pressure. What is the independent variable in the test study
Answer:
The independent variable in the test study is the new drug that supposedly helps control palpitations in people with high-blood pressure.
Explanation:
11. In relation to existing duties, which of the following statements is incorrect?
a) b) c)
d)
Performance of existing duties can never amount to good consideration.
Where the existing duties are exceeded, this may amount to good consideration
Where the promisee confers a benefit on the other party, this may amount to good consideration.
Where the promisee assists the other party in avoiding a detriment, this may amount to good consideration
12. An
a) Between friends and social acquaintances
b) Between husband and wife
c) Where parties in a commercial relationship have established the agreement between them is
'in honour only'
d) Between parties in a commercial relationship
13. Where a meaningless term is used in an agreement, the effect is?
a) The entire contract will be held unenforceable.
b) It has no practical effect on the contract - the whole contract is enforceable
c) This term, rather than the entire contract, may be held unenforceable.
d) The courts will order the parties to re-write the contract to more accurately identify what
their intentions were.
14. In relation to minors, which of the following types of contract is not voidable but binds the minor?
a) Contracts involving the sale of shares
b) Leasingproperty
c) Contracts of partnership
d) A contract for necessities
15. Which of the following is NOT a type of mistake in contract law?
a) Frustrated mistake
b) Common mistake
c) Mutual mistake
d) Unilateral mistake
16. Which of the following elements is incorrect in establishing an actionable misrepresentation?
a) A statement of material fact that induces the other party into the contract
b) A false representation
c) The innocent party did or did not believe the statement to be true
d) The representation induced the party into the contract.
Answer:
11. Performance of existing duties can never amount to good consideration.
12. Between husband and wife.
13. It has no practical effect on the contract. The whole contract is enforceable.
14. A contract of necessities
15. frustrated mistake
16. The innocent party did or did not believe the statements to be true.
Explanation:
A contract is a binding agreement in which both the parties are liable to fulfill the duties agreed in the contract. There can be terms listed in the contract on which both parties agrees. If there is a vague term, it needs to be cleared while if there is some meaningless term it has no effect on the contract.
borders are artificial constructs of power, oppression and discrimination. a. realist epistemology c. realist politics b. nominalist metaphysics d. realist ethics
The given statement “borders are artificial constructs of power, oppression and discrimination” is a representative of realist politics. This is because realist politics is concerned with the way power is wielded, oppressed, and discriminated within society. Option C.
Realist politics is the state of politics that believes in the use of power, oppression, and discrimination as the only way to ensure social stability. According to this view, social stability is primarily brought about by the use of power to maintain order. Therefore, in a political realm, a society must have a strong government to guarantee that order is maintained. The term "epistemology" is not directly related to the given statement. Epistemology is the study of knowledge and how it is acquired, validated, and used by individuals and societies. Therefore, the correct answer to the given question is option (c) realist politics.
Learn more about epistemology
https://brainly.com/question/31562337
#SPJ11
Ethics has to do with what my feelings tell me is right or wrong?
Answer:::: True.
Explain your answer:
Arthur Fairchild is accused of breaking into a top secret military installation and tampering with the records. Fairchild claims that at the time of the break-in he was with some friends smoking marijuana. Because that is against the law, his friends do not want to testify on his behalf. Will they have to?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
it is still against the law to smoke marijuana so they will have to testify anyway
11. Although he knew he was guilty of the crime, the mobster said he wouldn't answer questions
about it on the stand. Which amendment protected him?
a. 4th amendment
b. 5th amendment
6th amendment
d. 7th amendment
Answer:
5th amendment
Explanation:
The 5th amendment goes as follows "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
Answer:
5th
Explanation:
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger..."
5th Amedment, U.S Constitution
Bacically the constitution allows you to not answer the police officer if he asks you what happened, it is similar to Meranda Rights
Discuss monetary policy in India.
Answer:
Monetary policy is the process by which the monetary authority of a country, generally the central bank, controls the supply of money in the economy by its control over interest rates in order to maintain price stability and achieve high economic growth.
A system like 'Cap & Trade' in which businesses can buy and sell licenses which permit the emission of a certain amount of greenhouse gases is an example of?
Answer:
The system described is an example of an emissions trading scheme (ETS). In an ETS, a cap is set on the total amount of greenhouse gas emissions allowed, and then permits or credits representing the right to emit a certain amount of greenhouse gases are created and distributed among businesses. Businesses that emit less than their allotted amount can sell their unused permits to other businesses that need more permits to cover their emissions. This creates a market for emissions permits and provides an economic incentive for businesses to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.