the procedure in which an individual speaks for an extended period of time, in hopes of delaying or preventing a vote on a bill, is known as what?A) fillbusterB) fanne foxC) cloture

The statement that 'state laws will prevail over conflicting federal laws' is actually the opposite of what the Supremacy Clause establishes. The Supremacy Clause establishes that federal laws and the United States Constitution are the supreme law of the land, meaning that they take precedence over conflicting state laws.

What is the Supremacy Clause? The Supremacy Clause is a provision in the United States Constitution that establishes the authority of federal laws over state laws. It is found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution and reads: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

This clause ensures that federal laws and the Constitution take precedence over conflicting state laws and constitutions, and that state judges are bound to uphold federal law over state law in the event of a conflict.

Thus, the statement that state laws will prevail over conflicting federal laws is not true.

Learn more about Supremacy Clause at: https://brainly.com/question/2306140

#SPJ11

Governance is the process by which corporations establish their rules and policies and implement and monitor them. Good governance has a variety of important characteristics, and it can mean different things to different people.

Answer:

intermediate photograph

Explanation:

The claim you are referring to is known as the legal concept of "precedent" or "stare decisis."

Precedent is the principle that courts should follow the rulings of prior cases that are similar in legal issues and facts. It means that a court should apply the same legal principles and outcomes to similar cases in order to maintain consistency and predictability in the legal system.

When a party argues that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case and should be settled in the same way, they are relying on the principle of precedent.

Read mroe on precedent claim here https://brainly.com/question/2748145

#SPJ1

The above case represents - The investigator should create an interrogation strategy before starting the actual questioning by: Examining the suspect's background information, including their criminal history and previous investigations. reviewing all of the current investigation's information up to that point. deciding which aspects of the crime will need to be proven.

The various cases question can be written as-

To  know more about Police Interrogation here

https://brainly.com/question/1457191

#SPJ4

Answer:

One major law enacted by the federal government in relation to health is the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare. The ACA was passed in 2010 with the aim of improving access to healthcare, reducing healthcare costs, and enhancing the quality of care for all Americans.

Several factors promoted the legislation of the ACA. One key factor was the high number of uninsured individuals in the United States, which left many people without access to necessary medical services. The rising costs of healthcare and the challenges faced by individuals with pre-existing conditions in obtaining affordable coverage were also driving forces behind the ACA.

The ACA has various provisions that directly impact the health of older adults. It provides new protections for older Americans by prohibiting insurance companies from denying coverage or charging higher premiums based on age. The law also expands Medicaid, which benefits low-income older adults who may have previously struggled to afford healthcare.

Furthermore, the ACA introduced measures to enhance preventive care for older adults, such as free screenings and vaccinations. It established the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit, allowing seniors to receive preventive services and personalized prevention plans at no additional cost. The ACA also implemented changes to Medicare's prescription drug coverage, aiming to reduce out-of-pocket costs for prescription medications.

Overall, the ACA has had a significant impact on the health of older adults by expanding access to affordable healthcare, improving preventive services, and addressing some of the financial burdens associated with aging and healthcare costs. However, it remains a complex and debated law, and its implementation and effects continue to be evaluated and discussed.

Explanation:

One major law that has been enacted by the federal government in relation to health is the Affordable Care Act (ACA). What prompted this legislation was the high rates of uninsured Americans and the rising costs of healthcare. Older adults now have greater access to preventive care and chronic disease management services, which can help improve their overall health outcomes.

One major law that has been enacted by the federal government in relation to health is the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which was signed into law in 2010. The ACA was designed to increase the availability and affordability of health insurance coverage for Americans, including older adults.

What prompted this legislation was the high rates of uninsured Americans and the rising costs of healthcare. Before the ACA, many older adults were unable to afford health insurance due to their age and pre-existing conditions, which made it difficult to access necessary medical care.

The ACA addressed this issue by prohibiting insurers from charging older adults more for coverage based on their age, and by expanding access to Medicaid for low-income individuals and families.

As a result, older adults now have greater access to preventive care and chronic disease management services, which can help improve their overall health outcomes.

Additionally, the ACA also established the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, which is responsible for testing new payment and service delivery models that aim to improve the quality of care for older adults while reducing healthcare costs.

Read more about ACA at https://brainly.com/question/29793469

#SPJ11

A dispute concerning copyrights would be addressed under option D)  statutory law.

Statutory law is a type of law that is established by written laws passed by a legislative body. These laws are enacted by Congress or the legislature, and they are codified in a jurisdiction's legal code. Statutory law takes priority over common law, which is law that is created by judges based on legal precedent and customary law.In the United States, copyright disputes would be addressed under statutory law.

Specifically, the Copyright Act of 1976 governs copyright law and provides a framework for addressing copyright disputes. This law defines what types of creative works can be copyrighted, how long copyrights last, and what rights copyright holders have. It also outlines the legal remedies available to copyright holders who have had their rights infringed upon.

To know more about statutory visit :

brainly.com/question/8868792

#SPJ11

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Solar power can serve as a substitute for fossil fuels and can also counteract the effects of burning fossil fuels by using thermal energy.

Answer:

definitaly thought process but serching process to

Explanation:

Parking and passing require coordination of many different driving skills combined with a continuous searching process.

While driving a vehicle on the road, it is important to be alert and be cautious. There are certain traffic rules to be followed while driving.

Parking one's car and passing over another car requires skills and rules to follow.

One requires coordination of driving skills along with continuous searching process for parking and passing a vehicle.

There are several types of parking maneuvers :

Passing a vehicle requires a good judgement.

Learn more about "driving" here :

https://brainly.com/question/21945861

A Contract which can either be refused or ratified is called voidable contract.

Contract is defined as a legally enforceable agreement that creates and obligations among parties. A contract involves transfer of goods, services, money or promise to transfer any of those for future dates.

A voidable contract is a contract which can be either affirmed or rejected at the option of one of the parties. Once the contract is repudiated by one party, it becomes Void contract.

Grounds for voidable contract are - Coercion, Undue Influence, Mental Incompetence, Intoxication, Fraud or Misrepresentation.

When a contract is entered into without the free consent of the party, it is considered a voidable contract. A voidable contract may be considered valid if it is not cancelled by the aggrieved party within a reasonable time.

Under USA legal system, Contract law regulates the obligation established by agreement, whether expressed or implied, between the private parties. Law of contract varies from state to state but also there is a presence of nationwide federal contract law.

Under Indian Legal System, Contract is defined under Indian Contract Act  1872 under which Voidable Contract is defined under Section 2(i) of the Act.

There are certain difference between USA Contract Act and Indian Contract Act based on:

-Presence of statute of fraud in USA which is not present in India

-India does not have separate legislation for sale of goods or services.

-American common law has imposed a good faith dealing requirement on parties entering a contract with each other

-Monetary damages in the United States can be classified into three types- expectation interest, reliance interest, and restitution of interest

Neither the Indian courts nor the Contract Act have classified damages as is done in the USA

To learn more about the Voidable Contract here

https://brainly.com/question/4272013

#SPJ3

Answer:

1. Sociology is the scientific study of society, including patterns of social relationships, social interaction, and culture. It focuses on the social, cultural, and political factors that shape and influence human behavior and societies.

2. Social structure refers to the organized patterns of relationships within a society. It includes the social institutions, norms, and values that shape and influence the behavior of individuals and groups within society.

3. The Gallup Poll is a public opinion polling organization that conducts surveys on a wide range of topics, including crime. The Justice Department survey on crime is a statistical survey conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice that collects data on crime and criminal justice in the United States. One key difference between the two surveys is that the Gallup Poll is a private organization, while the Justice Department survey is conducted by a government agency. Additionally, the Gallup Poll may use different methods and sample sizes than the Justice Department survey, which could result in different findings and conclusions.

I can't do the diagram for you.

Personal troubles that I have encountered that may also be public issues:

Lack of access to affordable healthcare: I have struggled to afford healthcare for myself and my family, and I know that this is a problem faced by many people in my community and beyond. This is a public issue because it affects a large number of people and has implications for public health and the overall well-being of our society.

Housing insecurity: I have struggled to afford stable and secure housing at times in my life, and I know that this is a problem faced by many people in my community. Housing insecurity is a public issue because it affects a large number of people and has implications for economic stability, social mobility, and overall well-being.

The purposes of the Food Safety Modernization Act were:

The Food Safety Modernization Act was enacted to prevent food-borne illnesses and ensure food safety.

The Food Safety Modernization Act overhauled food production regulations, giving the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) more authority in overseeing and enforcing food supply chains.

Thus, the Food Safety Modernization Act prevents food-related problems from arising from the production stage to the consumption stage.

Learn more about the Food Safety Modernization Act at https://brainly.com/question/13653111

Go live in L'Manburg.

If a person fails to claim depreciation, the most important consequence is that he lose the greatest tax benefit.

If a person has claimed incorrect amount of depreciation he can do the catchup adjustment, in order to correct the improper depreciation in the previous years.

Even if, the taxpayer has failed to claim depreciation entirely, he can do the following:

1) File an amended return.

2) The taxpayer can increase the basis of the property by the amount of depreciation that should have been claimed.

3) He/she can file form 3155 to change the accounting policy.

4) In the current year, he can file form 4562 to include the unclaimed depreciation in this year.

To know more about depreciation: https://brainly.com/question/28588335

Answer:

TAMA

Explanation:

Answer:

TAMA

Explanation:

Answer:

the 2nd amendment is the right to bear arms.

Explanation:

they might have cited the right to bear arms because when the government is seen as out of control the people can take over. so I'm guessing that because they see the stay at home order as unfair they want to protest and have guns. but I'm not 100% sure this is right. I just hope this helps

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) enforces security regulations at airports in the United States through a combination of measures aimed at protecting passengers, baggage, and aircraft.

The TSA's enforcement of security regulations primarily involves the following aspects:
Screening Procedures: The TSA conducts passenger and baggage screening using various technologies such as X-ray scanners, metal detectors, and explosive detection systems. These procedures help identify prohibited items and potential security threats.
Security Checkpoints: TSA officers stationed at security checkpoints ensure compliance with security protocols by conducting thorough inspections of passengers and their belongings. This includes checking identification, verifying boarding passes, and screening individuals for prohibited items.
Security Equipment and Training: The TSA deploys advanced security equipment and provides specialized training to its officers to enhance their ability to detect and respond to security threats effectively. This includes training in threat recognition, behavior detection, and response protocols.
Security Measures: The TSA implements additional security measures, such as random passenger screening, enhanced pat-downs, and canine teams, to deter and detect potential threats.
While the TSA has broad authority to enforce security regulations, there are certain limits to its enforcement powers. The agency must operate within the confines of applicable laws, regulations, and constitutional protections, including respecting passengers' rights to privacy and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures.In terms of penalties for non-compliance with TSA security regulations, they can vary depending on the specific violation. The TSA has the authority to issue civil penalties, which can range from fines to legal actions. For example, individuals who attempt to bring prohibited items through security checkpoints may face fines, denied boarding, or even criminal charges in severe cases. Additionally, the TSA may implement measures such as increased screening or additional security procedures for non-compliant individuals or airports.It's important to note that compliance with TSA security regulations is a critical aspect of maintaining aviation security and ensuring the safety of passengers and crew. Airlines, airport operators, and individuals are expected to cooperate with the TSA's security measures to maintain a secure and efficient air travel environment.

To know more about civil penalties, click here https://brainly.com/question/32396562

#SPJ11

Answer:

Yes, it is possible to find a balance between justice and the implementation of Ubuntu and its inherent ideas of rehabilitative justice. Explanation: In relation to processes which create trust, integrity, peace and justice, Ubuntu is about listening and recognising others.

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Answer:

A. Personal Freedoms must not take away the freedom of others.

Explanation:

Personal freedoms can mean a ton of things, for example the 10 amendments, the bill of rights, the entire U.S Constitution.

the U.S Government decided a long time ago that it would become a superpower for democracy, which, is working, but if we consider what democracy means, what it stands as an ideology, you can say it means:
Freedom for All
You can say it's goal is to champion:
Equality For All

Going back to my first sentence, when you would like to define "Personal Freedoms" which is a vague term because it can mean almost anything, but when you look at the key word "Personal" which affects only yourself, and when it effects only yourself can it take away the freedoms of others? No.

The Idea of "Personal Freedoms" Serving the government sounds a bit Totalitarian, the freedom of a person couldn't necessarily serve the government, unless they know something we don't, but we don't have to worry about this right now, but when they say "Serving the Government" are they labelling us as, "slaves?" or "Servants?" I don't see this (B) being the answer either.

When they say said freedoms can cause harm to the minority population, which I assume is persons under the age of 18 which varies by state, what do they mean?

The Minority population being excluded & Included from certain guaranteed rights has long been debated by U.S Lawmakers, such as: the right to own a gun, (Second Amendment), the Right to own a house or drive or get a credit card and bank account, Lawmakers exclude the minority population from certain rights to protect them, because yes, this can harm them, driving, owning a gun, buying a house, getting a credit card, drinking, smoking, vaping, etc.

But Then again, these very well effect the adult population just as great as the minority population and it asked if Personal Freedoms only affect the minority population, so, this is wrong.

Lastly on to the notion that personal freedoms are REQUIRED to contribute to the common good, the common good is a vague term and can mean ANYTHING, from helping your old granny cross the street to giving to the homeless, although it's distinct definition is of affecting everyone, we can also shrink it, to one person for another, when we think about Personal Freedoms and Common Good they are just so different and Personal Freedoms don't even have to do with Common Good, unless your thinking of the civil rights protest and Women's right's protest and black lives matter and the LGBTQ+ Community, but what we have to understand is that these freedom's are guaranteed to everyone, and you are not required to use these freedoms granted to you for the common good.

That is all young one, I see you'll have a bright future as a lawyer or judge someday and If your still confused, I'm accepting comments.

- I wish for my name to not be revealed, Criminal Defense Attorney-at-Law PhD & Yale Graduate with Highest Honors.

Answer:

the most elaborate connection between different regions of the brain.

either create a case or a senario, give details but dont go like super indept. you need to decide what kind of crime you want to do in your senario.

- homocide

- burgrlary

- assult

- weapon charges

- violent crime

- drug possesion

ect..

not sure if this helps or not sorry if it doesnt

The US Supreme Court set operating guidelines for the administration of criminal justice, and the states are allowed to follow these guidelines. Here option E is the correct answer.

The US Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the country, and its rulings establish binding precedents that apply to all states. As such, states are not free to lower, ignore, or raise the minimum or maximum operating procedures established by the Court in criminal justice matters.

The US Constitution grants the Supreme Court the power to interpret federal law, including the Constitution itself, and to determine the constitutionality of state and federal actions. When the Court issues a ruling on a criminal justice matter, it establishes a legal precedent that binds all lower courts and state authorities. This means that states must abide by the Court's decisions and incorporate its operating procedures into their criminal justice systems.

For example, in Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court established the requirement that police officers must inform suspects of their constitutional rights (the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney) before questioning them in custody. This ruling applies to all states, and failure to comply with it can result in the exclusion of evidence obtained through unconstitutional means.

To learn more about Supreme Court

https://brainly.com/question/12848156

#SPJ4

Complete question:

The states are free to ________ operating procedures established by the US Supreme Court that apply to the administration of criminal justice.

A. lower or reduce the

B. ignore the

C. raise the minimum

D. raise the maximum

E. adopt

Answer:

The law serves many purposes. Four principal ones are establishing standards, maintaining order, resolving disputes, and protecting liberties and rights.

Explanation:

Hazardous materials are defined as a substance or material which can cause any kind of harm to people or animals.

What are hazardous materials?

To learn more about hazardous material visit: https://brainly.com/question/14309081

#SPJ4

A practitioner may be subject to sanctions for disreputable conduct under Circular 230 in all of the following cases, except for a crime involving breach of trust. Hence, option D is appropriate.

Any person who holds a professional practice license or other authorization from the Education Law is referred to as a professional practitioner.

A doctor, dentist, veterinarian, researcher in science, pharmacist, hospital, or another individual who has been granted a license, registration, or other authorization by the United States or even the jurisdiction is referred to as a "practitioner."

The core of your business is the practitioner component. It involves showing concern for the individual in front of you. This emphasizes how you see your clients and carry out your duties. The head, in contrast, to the hand, represents the owner of the firm.

Hence, option B is correct.

Learn more about the Practitioner here:

https://brainly.com/question/14893245

#SPJ1

Answer: Arbitration Trial

Explanation: