The main goal is two-fold: 1) we will lay out a foundation of how to understand drugs from a few angles to make sure you have a broad understanding of the issue and 2) we need to understand the forces out there that are responsible in shaping drug policy.
Your job this week is to find a recent example of a moral panic and tell us exactly why your example fits the 'moral panic' phenomenon. Is there a moral entrepreneur in your example? Is there a 'folk devil?' Who are they? What parts do they play in perpetuating the panic, leading to bad policy? What was the bad policy that your example resulted in? And so on...
REAL ANSWERS ONLY!!!!
NO LINKS!!!!!!
Answers
In the case of the opioid crisis, moral entrepreneurs can be identified as individuals or groups who take up the cause of raising awareness about the dangers of opioids and advocating for stricter policies to combat opioid abuse. This includes politicians, advocacy groups, medical professionals, and media outlets that played a role in highlighting the issue and framing it as a major societal problem.
The "folk devils" in this scenario are often portrayed as individuals who misuse opioids or those who are involved in the production and distribution of illicit drugs. They are demonized and blamed for the crisis, leading to a fear-driven public narrative.
The moral panic surrounding opioids perpetuates itself through media coverage, public discourse, and political agendas. Sensationalized stories and fear-based messaging contribute to the perception that opioids are an imminent threat to society, amplifying the panic and leading to misguided policy responses.
One example of bad policy resulting from this moral panic is the implementation of overly restrictive prescribing practices and regulations on opioid medications. While addressing the issue of overprescribing and inappropriate use of opioids was necessary, the resulting policies have also created challenges for individuals with legitimate medical needs, limiting their access to effective pain management.
Furthermore, the focus on punitive measures and criminalization has overshadowed the importance of harm reduction strategies and access to evidence-based treatment for individuals struggling with opioid addiction. This has hindered progress in addressing the underlying causes of the crisis and providing support for those affected.
In summary, the opioid crisis in the United States can be seen as a moral panic, driven by moral entrepreneurs and fueled by media narratives and fear. The resulting policies have often been misguided, leading to unintended consequences and hindering effective responses to the complex issue of opioid misuse and addiction.
The phenomenon of “moral panic” is a social phenomenon that has been recognized in many societies. The concept has been introduced to explain the way in which societies are prone to reacting to events, issues, or people.
The moral panic phenomenon can be defined as a reaction to a perceived threat to the morals, values, and ideals of society. Such events are often characterized by a sense of urgency, a call to action, and a sense of impending doom. The phenomenon is usually fueled by the media, which can exacerbate and amplify the perceived threat. The moral panic phenomenon has been used to explain a variety of social issues, including drug use, juvenile delinquency, and political extremism.
In the case of drug use, moral panics often result in the creation of laws and policies that criminalize drug use and lead to the imprisonment of large numbers of people. This approach has been criticized by some experts, who argue that it is ineffective and counterproductive. In recent years, the opioid epidemic has been a major concern in the United States. Opioids are a class of drugs that includes prescription painkillers such as oxycodone, hydrocodone, and fentanyl, as well as illegal drugs like heroin.
The opioid epidemic has been fueled by a variety of factors, including over-prescription of painkillers, the availability of illegal drugs, and the high cost of treatment for addiction. In response to the opioid epidemic, many states have implemented policies aimed at reducing the availability of prescription painkillers. One such policy is the prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP), which requires doctors to check a patient's prescription history before prescribing opioids.
The PDMP has been criticized by some experts, who argue that it is ineffective in reducing the number of opioid-related deaths and may lead to unintended consequences, such as patients seeking illegal drugs to treat their pain the opioid epidemic is a recent example of a moral panic. The moral entrepreneur in this case is the media, which has played a role in shaping public perception of the issue. The “folk devil” is the drug user, who is often portrayed as a dangerous criminal. The policy resulting from this moral panic is the PDMP, which has been criticized for its ineffectiveness and potential negative consequences.
For more questions on juveniles
https://brainly.com/question/29398659
#SPJ8
Related Questions
Which of the following is a correct statement of federal preemption of state law under the Supremacy Clause?
A state's attempt to regulate television and radio is preempted by federal law because the federal government has regulated the entire field. & A state law that requires documentation of citizenship is preempted by the National Voter Registration Act because the act only requires a statement under oath.
Answers
A correct statement of federal preemption of state law under the Supremacy Clause is a state's attempt to regulate television and radio is preempted by federal law because the federal government has regulated the entire field.
A state law that requires documentation of citizenship is preempted by the National Voter Registration Act because the act only requires a statement under oath. A conflict may occur between state laws and federal laws when they impose different requirements on a party.
All federal and state laws flowing from the constitution is referred to supreme law despite any contrary state law that is clear by the supremacy clause.Federal law should be preempt can occur in state law when federal laws dominate a field that a state law seeks to regulate or when federal laws and state directly conflict with each other.
Learn more about Supremacy Clause click on the link here:
https://brainly.com/question/2212707
#SPJ4
Which service is only provided by the federal government?
A : operation of police and fire departments?
B: garbage collection
C: national defense
D: setting education standards for children
Answers
Why is the job of a computer forensic investigator becoming increasingly important?
Answers
The job of a computer forensic investigator is becoming increasing important because of increase in digitization. Investigator gets the information from the computer storage and other electronic devices.
Who is computer forensic investigator?Computer forensic investigators help retrieve information from computers and other digital storage devices. The retrieved data can then be used in criminal investigations or as evidence in cases for cyber crimes.
The forensics investigator is in charge of reviewing the "caught" evidence from the scene of the incident or event at first.
Learn more about Forensics investigator here
https://brainly.com/question/13073221
#SPJ2
Now that you have listened to the first chapter of Common Sense, what do you think of Paine's philosophy? Particularly, what do think about how he views the government? Do you think he is right or wrong, and why?
Answers
Concept on clashes with considarartion to values
Answers
Answer:
Concept on clashes with consideration to values is described below in details.
Explanation:
A conflict originating from the interplay of people with diverse cultural values. There are two types of conflict in history: Internal conflict is within the character's psyche. Internal conflict can be characterized as a conflict between resisting forces of passion or sentiments within a person. External is a struggle between a persona and an external force.
The term amicus curiae means: Select one: a. friendly cure or the amicable resolution to a mediated dispute. b. friend of the court and refers to briefs filed by third parties interested in the outcome of a certain appeal. c. small couriers or the briefs, originally used by foot messengers, which are used to communicate between lawyers and the courts. d. the name for the conductor of an arbitration, a position originally filled by medieval clergy.
Answers
Answer:
Friend of the court and refers to briefs filed by third parties interested in the outcome of a certain appeal
Explanation:
Literally translated from Latin to English, amicus curiae means "friend of the senate"
A charge identifies the criminal activity, the facts of the case; and the circumstances of the arrest. What is this document called in the case of misdemeanor offenser? 2. a bill of indictencest b. in complaint L. n nolle prosequi d. alt information
Answers
In the case of misdemeanor offenses, the document that identifies the criminal activity, the facts of the case, and the circumstances of the arrest is called a complaint.
A complaint refers to the document used in criminal proceedings that outlines the details of an alleged offense. A charge identifies the criminal activity, the facts of the case, and the circumstances of the arrest.The primary purpose of a complaint is to inform the accused of the charges filed against them and enable them to prepare for their defense. Additionally, the complaint is used by the court to initiate criminal proceedings against the defendant.A bill of indictments refers to the formal document that outlines the charges against an accused individual following an indictment by a grand jury. An indictment is a formal charge issued by a grand jury, indicating that there is enough evidence to support the charges against an individual.In contrast, a nolle prosequi refers to a legal document that indicates the intention of a prosecutor to drop charges against an accused person. The document may be issued due to various reasons, including insufficient evidence to support the charges, plea bargains, or lack of interest in pursuing the case.Alternatively, an information refers to a formal accusation issued by a prosecutor, indicating that an individual has committed a crime and should face criminal charges. The information outlines the charges against the accused person and enables them to prepare for their defense in court.
To know more about misdemeanor visit:
brainly.com/question/30175834
#SPJ11
"How can a celebrity receive an impartial jury?
The Sixth Amendment provides that the accused has the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury. An impartial jury is a jury that will consider a case fairly. An impartial jury does not immediately assume guilt or innocence. As with the case problem involving Winona Ryder, how does the accused and other celebrities receive an impartial jury? Trials involving celebrities capture much attention. It is likely that most potential jurors either hold celebrities in high regard or the opposite, resent their celebrity. In a trial involving a celebrity, during voir dire do attorneys assume that potential jurors are familiar with the case and use different tactics for jury selection?"
Answers
When a celebrity is involved in a trial and seeks an impartial jury, there are several strategies that can be employed to ensure a fair and unbiased jury selection process: Voir Dire ,Change of Venue ,Jury Questionnaires ,Challenges for Cause and Peremptory Challenges
Voir Dire: During the jury selection process, attorneys question potential jurors to assess their biases, prejudices, and knowledge of the case. In trials involving celebrities, attorneys may assume that potential jurors are familiar with the case due to media coverage.
Change of Venue: Requesting a change of venue is an option to move the trial to a different location. This is done to minimize the impact of extensive media coverage and public opinions in the celebrity's home jurisdiction.
Jury Questionnaires: Attorneys may use jury questionnaires to gather detailed information about potential jurors. These questionnaires can delve into their backgrounds, attitudes, and exposure to media coverage, helping to identify any biases or prejudices that could affect their ability to be impartial.
Challenges for Cause and Peremptory Challenges: Attorneys can utilize challenges for cause to remove potential jurors who exhibit clear bias or inability to be impartial. Additionally, peremptory challenges allow attorneys to dismiss a limited number of potential jurors without providing a specific reason.
Sequestration: In high-profile cases, sequestration may be considered, which involves isolating the jury from outside influences during the trial to prevent media bias and public opinion from impacting their decision-making.
It is essential to uphold the principles of an impartial jury, even in cases involving celebrities. By employing these strategies, the accused, including celebrities, can strive to receive a jury that will consider the case fairly and make a verdict based on the presented evidence, rather than preconceived notions or media influence.
Learn more about media coverage.
https://brainly.com/question/30235857
#SPJ11
because her ruling ended a 1995 strike, justice sonia sotomayor is known as the judge that saved what?
Answers
Answer:Of course, the Major League Baseball Players Association filed suit and the case ended up before U.S. District Court Judge Sonia Sotomayor, a native of the Bronx who was an enthusiastic New York Yankees fan. Sotomayor ruled in favor of the players union; and appeals courts agreed. That ended what was a 232-day strike.
Match the steps to the order in which they take place to describe how a bill becomes a law. 1. Step 1 The bill goes to the president. 2. Step 2 The president signs the bill. 3. Step 3 The full House or Senate debates the bill. 4. Step 4 The House or Senate votes on the bill. 5. Step 5 The bill is referred to a committee for consideration. 6. Step 6 One or more members of Congress introduce the bill. 7. Step 7 The committee votes on the bill.
Answers
Answer:
6. Step 1 One or more members of Congress introduce the bill.
5. Step 2 The bill is referred to a committee for consideration.
7. Step 3 The committee votes on the bill.
3. Step 4 The full House or Senate debates the bill.
4. Step 5 The House or Senate votes on the bill.
1. Step 6 The bill goes to the president.
2. Step 7 The president signs the bill.
Explanation:
The process of any bill to become a law involves a number of deliberations and steps before it can become a law. These processes involves not only a single group of people but more of the governing power houses of the government.
The first step is to introduce the bill by the one bringing forward the idea of the bill. Then it goes to the Congress committee to be considered for any further action. If the committee accepts to push forward the bill, it is then sent to the House or Senate, depending on the source of the bill's introduction. If the committee doesn't find it fit to be a bill, then it dies down and doesn't move any further.
In the House or Senate, the members debate and vote on the bill. If they accept it, then it moves forward to the President of the country. If rejected, then the bill goes back to be changed or even completely rejected.
Once it reaches the President, the bill becomes a law once he/ she accepts it.
Discuss Saudi judicial system that is followed by basic trial
procedures (in 300 to 500 words)
Answers
Saudi Arabia is an Islamic state, and its judicial system for both criminal and civil cases is based on Islamic law (Shari'ah). The King is at the apex of the legal system, serving as the final court of appeal and a source of pardon.
Saudi Arabia's legal system is based on Sharia, Islamic law based on the Qur'an and the Sunnah (traditions) of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. Sharia's sources also include Islamic scholarly consensus formed after Muhammad's death. Its interpretation by Saudi judges is influenced by the mediaeval texts for the literalist Hanbali school of Islamic law. Saudi Arabia is the only Muslim country that has adopted Sharia in its uncodified form. This, combined with a lack of judicial precedent, has created significant uncertainty about the scope and content of the country's laws.
Learn more about Saudi Arabia, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15174193
#SPJ4
Which Act is being violated when you post the private information of someone
on social media?
Answers
Right to privacy
Explanation by posting private information about someone on social media you are invading someone's personal life. It is there right to decide if they want to share there information or not
The act that is being violated when you post the private information of someone on social media is typically referred to as Privacy Act or Privacy Laws.
Privacy laws are designed to protect individuals' right to privacy and prevent the unauthorized disclosure of their personal information without their consent.
By posting someone's private information on social media without their permission, you are violating their right to privacy and potentially infringing upon applicable privacy laws and regulations. It is important to respect and uphold the privacy of individuals by refraining from sharing their private information without proper authorization.
To learn more about the privacy act:
brainly.com/question/31822745
Which statement best describes an advantage of indirect democracy over
direct dermocracy?
OA. Itcan better prevent political leaders from serving their own
interests.
O B. It can increase the efficiency of decision making.
O C. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
O D. It can help citizens feel more connected to the government.
Answers
Answer:
O B. It can increase the efficiency of decision making.
Explanation:
Having less people to vote typically generates a smaller chance of failing, as well as speeding up the process in which collecting the votes would be quicker and more efficient.
Imagine if the U.S. was a direct democracy. Votes would take weeks if not months to be counted, and there may be large proportions of people's votes thrown out due to failure to fill out forms properly. Recent news has also shown us that large amount of voter fraud already occurs, and this is just with popular votes which does not hold too much weight inside the actual election. If we were to drop indirect democracy for direct democracy, be sure that there will be more fraud from one side, more pressure from the other, and chaos all around.
~
Think of the ways that Nationalist sentiment has an effect on life in contemporary America. Please look beyond the easy "Trumpism" stereotypes, and instead discuss what self-proclaimed nationalists believed before he ever came along. Why is this ideology so appealing to so many people?
Answers
Answer:
nationalism is the concept of pride for your country, nationalists believe in the America first idea, and that nothing could ever top the individual liberties, policies, and freedoms of America
What tactic did famous crime bosses like Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino MOST likely use to keep order in their organizations?
Answers
An act of committing organized crime are the tactics used by crime bosses such as Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino
Who is Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino?Edward Teach was one of the most fear sea pirates and Carlo Gambino was the head of a crime organization in U.S.
An organized crime means a continuing criminal enterprise that works by profiting from an illicit activities.
In conclusion, the act of committing organized crime are the tactics used by crime bosses such as Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino.
Read more about organized crime
brainly.com/question/8451608
Choosing a legal career is not easy, in addition to the possibilities, there is the weight of participating in one of the most important and influential careers in society. This means that those who chose this type of career have a lot of dedication to all the academic material that will be submitted, from the first year of study. In addition, it is necessary to think rationally, since this is a branch, where acting out of emotion and impulse is not stimulated, it is necessary to think, research and reason before making any choice. Lastly, it is necessary to always keep the focus, so as not to succumb to the needs that may arise halfway.
Answers
Question Completion:
What skills are required for a legal career?
Answer:
The skills required for a legal career are:
1. Dedication
2. Rational thinking
3. Ability to research
4. Focus
Explanation:
The above mentioned four skills are required of a legal practitioner, starting from the school days and throughout the practitioner's professional life. Without these skills, success cannot be attained. A legal practitioner must judge issues based on facts and reason, without employing emotions. Thinking rationally, employing reason instead of emotions in decisions, and carrying out in-depth research, the legal practitioner is set for career success.
If someone runs a red light in front of you, and you choose NOT to slow down or steer away, you will
A. have to appear in court if there is collision
B. not oe at fault if there is a collision
C. probably not be involved in a collision
D. be partially at fault if there is a collision
Answers
When driving and someone runs a red light in front of you and you decide not to slow down or steer away, you will B. not be at fault if there is a collision.
What happens when someone runs a red light?If someone runs a red light, then they would have gone against traffic laws which could lead to an accident if they collide with someone that is coming from a side of the road with a green light.
If you are that person who was coming from the area with a green light and you collided with the person coming from the lane with a red light, you will not be at fault.
This is regardless of if you willfully did not turn away or slow down. You did not break the traffic law and so you cannot be not at fault because the person who ran the red light is the one who committed an offence.
In conclusion, option B is correct.
Find out more on running the red light at https://brainly.com/question/1266409
#SPJ1
Provide TWO (2) examples or situations that
prompt a MNC from a developed country to take advantage of the less
stringent laws and regulations of the local market in a developing
country (e.g., laws r
Answers
TWO examples or situations that prompt a MNC from a developed country to take advantage of the less stringent laws and regulations of the local market in a developing country are Tax Avoidance, Environmental Regulations.
Tax Avoidance: One example is when a multinational corporation (MNC) from a developed country takes advantage of the less stringent tax laws and regulations in a developing country. They may establish subsidiaries or offshore entities in the developing country to shift profits and reduce their tax liability. By exploiting tax loopholes or lower tax rates in the developing country, the MNC can potentially minimize their overall tax burden and increase their profits.
Environmental Regulations: Another example is when an MNC relocates or outsources its production to a developing country with less stringent environmental regulations. By doing so, the MNC can avoid the costs and compliance requirements associated with stricter environmental standards in their home country. This allows them to potentially operate with fewer restrictions, lower production costs, and potentially contribute to environmental degradation in the developing country.
It is important to note that these examples illustrate situations where MNCs may exploit differences in laws and regulations between developed and developing countries. However, it is crucial to promote responsible business practices that prioritize sustainability, ethical behavior, and adherence to global standards to ensure equitable and sustainable development for all parties involved.
Learn more about tax loopholes
https://brainly.com/question/7227568
#SPJ11
which pull factor is responsible for the east to west migration pattern evident in the european union region?
Answers
Better economic opportunities is responsible for the east to west migration pattern evident in the European union region.
By giving actors more and better information with which to make decisions and enhancing stability, the media increases the economy's efficiency. The growth of the media industry can lower political risk and boost stability in nations with higher political risk.Although there is no one-size-fits-all definition of economic opportunity, most people will concur that it equates to the achievement of individual potential. It will be considerably more difficult for a youngster to reach her intellectual potential and later her economic potential if she has to deal with an inadequate educational system or a poisonous environment.To know more about Opportunities here
https://brainly.com/question/24767012
#SPJ4
How much of congress must approve an amendment to the u. S. Constitution before it is sent to the states?.
Answers
congress must approve two-thirds of an amendment to U. S. Constitution before it is sent to the states.
What is a constitutional amendment?Through a constitutional amendment, the constitution of a state, organization, or another type of body can be modified. The relevant sections of an existing constitution are frequently amended immediately. However, they can also be added to the constitution as additional additions (codicils), affecting the structure of government without altering the original text.
Most constitutions need amendments to go through a stricter special procedure than is required for regular legislation before they may become law. Examples of such extraordinary methods include supermajorities in the legislature, direct voter approval in a referendum, or even a combination of two or more unique procedures.
To know more about constitutional amendment visit:- https://brainly.com/question/699977
#SPJ4
50 points !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answers
Answer:
Consumer protection
Explanation:
Answer:
A.CONSUMER PROTECTIONExplanation:
The NRC licenses and regulates the Nation's civilian use of radioactive materials to provide reasonable assurance of adequate protection of public health and safety and to promote the common defense and security and to protect the environment.
What AR covers the policies and responsibilities of command, which include the Well-being of the force, military discipline, and conduct, the Army EO Program, and the Army Sexual Assault Victim Program?
Answers
AR 600-20 covers the policies and responsibilities of command, which address various aspects essential for maintaining a professional and effective Army. These aspects include the Well-being of the force, military discipline and conduct, the Army Equal Opportunity (EO) Program, and the Army Sexual Assault Victim Program.
The Well-being of the force ensures that soldiers have access to the necessary resources and support for their physical, emotional, and mental health. This holistic approach contributes to a more resilient and combat-ready force.
Military discipline and conduct are crucial for maintaining order and efficiency within the Army. AR 600-20 outlines standards for behavior, addressing issues such as insubordination and misconduct, while fostering a culture of professionalism and respect.
The Army EO Program aims to promote equal opportunity and eliminate discrimination based on race, color, religion, gender, or national origin. This program helps create an inclusive environment where everyone is treated fairly and has the opportunity to excel.
Lastly, the Army Sexual Assault Victim Program provides support to victims of sexual assault, ensuring their safety and well-being. This program emphasizes prevention, education, and appropriate response to sexual assault incidents, fostering a safe and respectful Army community.
In summary, AR 600-20 establishes guidelines and policies for command responsibilities, focusing on the well-being of soldiers, military discipline, equal opportunity, and support for sexual assault victims to maintain a professional and effective Army.
You can learn more about Military discipline at: brainly.com/question/30208301
#SPJ11
What was the law or issue in Miranda V. Arizona case
Answers
Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled that a defendant's statements to authorities are inadmissible in court unless he has been informed of his right to have an attorney present during questioning and an understanding that anything he says will be held against him in a court of law.
Write a research about a human rights violation case, for example, discrimination, lack of
access to justice, police abuse, arbitrary arrest and detention, illtreatment and torture.
Define one category of human rights, for example, civil and
political rights, women’s rights or children rights.
• Applicable Law / International convention governing the
category of rights relating to your choice (its Structure)?
• Give one example of case about human rights violations under the
international conventions concerning human rights and review the
ability of individuals to complain about the violation of their rights in an
international arena.
• You may introduce any other parts you consider
Answers
Discrimination as a breach of civil rights is still a major problem in the field of human rights. The legal framework for people to seek redress for such violations is provided by the UDHR and ICCPR.
Progress in addressing and preventing discrimination promoting equality and protecting civil rights for all can be made by empowering people to lodge complaints at international forums and interacting with pertinent stakeholders.
A serious issue in the field of human rights is discrimination as a violation of civil rights. Civil rights include access to justice and are safeguarded by international treaties like the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. James, who experienced age discrimination in the workplace is a notable example of this violation.
Through institutions like the UN Human Rights Committee and regional human rights courts, people are better able to seek redress for these violations in a global setting. In order to combat discrimination, uphold civil rights and work toward equality and justice for all, cooperation with human rights organizations and group efforts are essential.
Learn more about human rights at:
brainly.com/question/701318
#SPJ4
IM GIVING BRAINLIEST. who is the right person to vote for
Answers
Answer:
Your own decision!
Explanation:
Don't let other people influence choices that are totally up to you to choose
State your position on Christianity and world relegion
In 12 Sentence
Answers
Explanation:
Religion is a belief. For example, atheism is a belief that there is no God.
Christianity is a belief, but it is more than that. Christianity states that Christ is the Creator if the world, and died on the cross for the sins of the world, rising again the third day.
Christianity has not been proven to be false, and is the foundation for the U.S.
It has changed lives permanently, and ensured a home in Heaven for any that would just accept Him as their Savior.
My personal experience is that God did change my life, and I'm not afraid to die, because I know my destiny; one that is real.
The Sixth Fleet's responsibility to NATO include ______________. Select all that apply.
A. report to NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe
B. prepare to conduct maritime strike and amphibious/expeditionary operations
C. deter aggression against NATO members
Answers
The Sixth Fleet's responsibility to NATO includes reporting to NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe and deterring aggression against NATO members. Option A and Option C are correct.
The Sixth Fleet is one of the numbered fleets of the United States Navy and is responsible for naval operations in Europe and Africa. As a part of NATO, the Sixth Fleet works to maintain stability in the region by deterring any potential aggression against NATO members.
It also reports to NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe, who is responsible for the overall military command of NATO.
However, the option B, which refers to the preparation to conduct maritime strike and amphibious/expeditionary operations, is not explicitly mentioned as one of the Sixth Fleet's responsibilities to NATO.
To know more about NATO, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/3601439#
#SPJ11
Canada Contractual Law
Valerie wants to splurge on her new she-shed (outdoor female equivalent of a man cave) Although her she-shed did have a lovely wine fridge and a crystal chandelier, something was missing. She hired a landscaping company – Major Tom’s Ground Control to provide a boxwood hedge, an angel stone path leading up to the shed, and several exotic plants and trees. A contract was drawn up which spelled out what Major Tom would do in exchange for $10,000.00. Valerie provided Major Tom with a $5,000.00 deposit to begin the work they had agreed upon. One stipulation in the contract, was that Major Tom would remove all leftover plant material and debris and clean the property before they left.
On the afternoon the landscaping was to be completed, she arrived home from work with her friends ready to begin enjoying the she-shed. The she shed looked lovely. Major Tom was nowhere to be found but they had left behind a hill of dirt, several shovels, a pair of work boots and two empty cases of beer. Valerie was not happy. She called Major Tom and told them that she would not pay the balance of $5000.00 because they had failed to clean the property as indicated by the contract after the work was completed.
What are the legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario? Does she have a case?
Based on the material in Chapter 7, provide a clear and detailed rationale as to what can be done to solve the problem in this scenario.
Answers
The legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario are the Breach of Contract and Contractual Remedies. Valerie has a case in this scenario.
What can be done to solve the problem in this scenario is that a demand letter can be sent to Major Tom’s Ground Control company. This letter should indicate that they breached the contract by failing to clean the property after completing the work and that she will not be paying the balance of $5000.00. In addition, Valerie should include that she is willing to pay a fair amount to have another company come in and clean up the property. Finally, she could inform Major Tom’s Ground Control that if they fail to comply with her demands, she will take legal action against them.
It is necessary to note that a demand letter should be sent with registered mail. This ensures that the letter is received by the intended recipient. If the letter is ignored, Valerie may need to file a claim in Small Claims Court. The evidence to support her claim includes the contract, deposit, pictures of the property, the demand letter, and any other correspondence between her and Major Tom's Ground Control.
Learn more about Small Claims Court: https://brainly.com/question/16507110
#SPJ11
african american marriages are twice as likely to end in divorce as those of whites and native-born mexican americans. which of the following factors contribute to this difference?
Answers
There are several factors that contribute to the higher divorce rate among African American marriages compared to those of whites and native-born Mexican Americans. One of the primary factors is socio-economic status, as African American couples are more likely to experience financial instability and poverty which can put a strain on the marriage.
Additionally, cultural differences and societal pressures can also play a role in divorce rates.
Research has shown that African American couples are more likely to experience economic hardship and unemployment which can lead to stress and conflict within the marriage. This can include difficulty paying bills, providing for children, and meeting basic needs, which can cause strain and lead to divorce. Additionally, African American couples may also experience cultural differences in their marriages that can contribute to divorce rates, such as differences in communication styles, expectations of gender roles, and family dynamics. Furthermore, societal pressures such as discrimination, racism, and lack of access to resources can also contribute to the higher divorce rates among African American couples. All of these factors together can create a challenging environment for African American marriages, leading to higher rates of divorce.
To know more about African American visit :
https://brainly.com/question/28847012
#SPJ11
An accident occurs between a truck and a family vehicle. The truck is owned by a corporation with businesses in Ohio and Pennsylvania. The truck driver is from Ohio. The corporation is incorporated in Delaware but is headquartered in Pennsylvania. The family members in the vehicle include a grandmother domiciled in New Jersey and a mother and daughter domiciled in Connecticut. The accident occurs in New York. The family sues the corporation.
Is there federal jurisdiction?
What states have jurisdiction? (Assume that subject matter jurisdiction requires the incident or the residents of all defendants to be in the state of suit. )
Answers
The United States of America is a federal republic made up of 50 states, a federal district (Washington, D.C., the nation's capital), five major territories, and numerous minor islands.
The states, as well as the United States as a whole, are both sovereign jurisdictions. Any state, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any American territory falls under the jurisdiction of the United States. England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland are the three legal jurisdictions of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Learn more about jurisdictions
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ4