The law that regulates access to information about chemicals used in workplaces is called Hazard Communication Standard.
The hazard communication standard requires employers inside the u.s. to reveal toxic and dangerous materials in workplaces. that is related to employee safety in general.
In particular, this requires unrestricted worker access to the cloth protection data Sheet or equal, and suitable training to understand health and safety risks.
Workplace safety within the USA began with Dr. Alice Hamilton in Chicago,[citation needed] who started out working for the country of Illinois in 1910 to address the place of job protection.
The Occupational safety and health administration become established in 1970 to standardize protection for all workers inside the united states, and threat conversation for poisonous substance exposure turned into included all through the Nineteen Eighties.
Learn more about hazard communication standard here: https://brainly.com/question/2027115
#SPJ4
according to pericles, what are the benefits of athenian democracy that make it worth saving, and what are the duties of the citizens of athens to keep this system working going forward?
Pericles, a prominent Athenian statesman in ancient Greece, highlighted several benefits of Athenian democracy that he believed made it worth preserving.
In his famous Funeral Oration, Pericles emphasized that Athenian democracy promotes equality and provides opportunities for all citizens to participate in decision-making. He praised the system for its freedom of speech, which encourages open debate and the exchange of ideas.
Pericles also emphasized the importance of civic duty and the responsibility of citizens to actively engage in the affairs of the city-state. He emphasized that citizens should serve the collective interest, participate in public life, and uphold the laws and institutions that sustain democracy, ensuring its continuation and prosperity for future generations.
Learn more about Athenian democracy
https://brainly.com/question/30127600
#SPJ11
Imagine two young men who commit an act of vandalism. One of them gets caught and goes to jail, but the other is not identified and goes to college. There is a probability that the one who goes to jail may become a criminal while there is possibly an equal probability that the one who goes to college will have a successful life. What does this suggest about the present system? How could one improve it?
Answer:
This suggest that the current system needs to be improved. Ask the person who was put in jail if he had anyone working with him, in exchange the criminal who was put in jail could have 3-5 years off his sentence.
Explanation:
Pls mark Brainliest with the crown
what is school based assessment
Answer:
a test of your school knowledge
Explanation:
A school based assessment is a process that requires the teachers to mark their students' work for fair assessment of their periodic performance.
The assessment is used as a information to increase students learning and development
In conclusion, the school based assessment is important because its allows to assess the performance of students.
Read more about school based assessment
brainly.com/question/26921511
Miranda rights must be advised only when a person is in custody.
True
False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Miranda applies only to custodial interrogations, which means the police don't have to give Miranda warnings every time they question or talk to someone. Miranda rights come into play when the police arrest or detain someone. Detention here means that the person reasonably believes he or she is not free to leave.
a police officer learned from a reliable informant that a major drug deal was about to take place at a local restaurant. the officer obtained a search warrant for the restaurant and arrived with other uniformed officers to search the premises. while conducting the search, the officer searched several of the customers. while searching one of the restaurant's regular customers, the officer felt an object in the customer's pocket and pulled out a container filled with heroin. the customer was arrested and later convicted of possession of heroin. a state statute permits officers executing a search warrant to search persons on the premises if the officers reasonably expect danger to themselves or a risk of disposal or concealment of anything described in the warrant. if the customer challenges his conviction on the ground that his fourth amendment rights were violated, will he be successful?
Answer:
a police officer learned from a reliable informant that a major drug deal was about to take pla
Explanation:
A department or agency whose officers have very clear law enforcement powers
such as a state, federal, or large metropolitan police force, would most likely be
classified as a
security service organization.
Answer:
I would say the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI)
Explanation:
The Federal Bureau of Investigations covers the entire united States and work in 65 other countries to eliminate threats from the United States, which means anything they touch is usually theirs.
On a city street you should be looking ahead of you as far as
It is expected that one should be looking ahead of as far as the car in front of you on a on a city street.
What is a city street?These are sub-roads that connect the houses in the inner city to the main road networks.
Hence, while driving, It is expected that one should be looking ahead of as far as the car in front of you on a on a city street.
Read more about city street
brainly.com/question/25404428
#SPJ1
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court for the first time explicitly adopted the doctrine against prior restraint as constitutional law.
The theory against prior restriction was explicitly adopted as constitutional law by the Supreme Court in a significant case, making it the first time in legal history.
The Supreme Court's adoption of the theory against prior restraint as constitutional law in the relevant case set a significant legal standard in US history. Instead of punishing the speaker after the fact, prior restraint refers to government efforts to suppress or prevent speech before it is voiced.
With the Court's decision in this case, the doctrine was for the first time expressly acknowledged and applied as a key component of free expression. The protection of free speech in the US has been significantly impacted by this ruling, which also served as the basis for numerous later court conflicts involving free speech and censorship.
Learn more about Supreme Court:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
The correct question will be: What did the Supreme Court adopt the theory against prior restraint?
What differentiates a stop from an arrest?
A. An arrest is a relatively short action that involves traveling to a police station to answer questions, while a stop may include significant prison time.
B. A stop and an arrest are exactly the same.
C. A stop involves a momentary delay of a person so that a police officer can ask a short series of questions; an arrest is a longer-term detention with the probability of charges being filed.
D. A stop requires the person that is the subject of the police inquiry to be driving a vehicle, while an arrest can occur whether the suspect is walking or driving.
The United States is on par with Russia in having more persons per capita in prison. Is that a sign that the United States is a nation that enforces its laws, or is it an
indication that something is inherently wrong with its criminal justice system? Please explain and then respond to a
According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.
What is criminal?
The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.
According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.
Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.
Learn more about on criminal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ1
Your first big case is a multiple murder.As defense attorney for Sy Kopath, you have come to the realization that he really did break into a couple's home and torture and kill them in the course of robbing them of jewelry and other valuables. He has even confessed to you that he did it. However, you are also aware that the police did not read him his Miranda warning and that he was coerced into giving a confession without your presence. What should you do? Would your answer be different if you believed that he was innocent or didn't know for sure either way?
Answer: ok he did it
Explanation:The reason is because 1+1 is 2 - 1 thats 3 quick maths.
Assuming a taxpayer does not exceed any income limitations that reduce or eliminate any of the following items, which of the following is not deductible by an individual taxpayer?
โข A. A $3,000 contribution to a Roth IRA by a 58 year old taxpayer.
[80%]
โข B. A penalty resulting from premature withdrawal of funds from a
certificate of deposit (CD). [12%]
โข C. Fees received for jury duty that are remitted to the taxpayer's
employer. [5%]
โข D. Tuition for courses taken by a self-employed insurance agent
that are required to maintain licensure in the taxpayer's state
of residence. [3%]
Assuming a taxpayer does not exceed any income limitations that reduce or eliminate any of the following items, the item that is not deductible by an individual taxpayer is: A $3,000 contribution to a Roth IRA by a 58-year-old taxpayer. The correct option is A.
A. Roth IRA contributions are not deductible because they are made with after-tax dollars. Therefore, they do not reduce the taxpayer's taxable income.
B. A penalty resulting from premature withdrawal of funds from a certificate of deposit (CD) is deductible as it is considered an adjustment to income, reducing the taxpayer's taxable income.
C. Fees received for jury duty that are remitted to the taxpayer's employer are deductible as an adjustment to income, lowering the taxpayer's taxable income since they are not retained by the taxpayer.
D. Tuition for courses taken by a self-employed insurance agent that are required to maintain licensure in the taxpayer's state of residence is deductible as a business expense on Schedule C, reducing the taxpayer's net profit from self-employment.
In summary, the non-deductible item for an individual taxpayer is A $3,000 contribution to a Roth IRA by a 58-year-old taxpayer.
To know more about taxpayer, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28446902#
#SPJ11
Complete question:
Assuming a taxpayer does not exceed any income limitations that reduce or eliminate any of the following items, which of the following is not deductible by an individual taxpayer?
A. A $3,000 contribution to a Roth IRA by a 58 year old taxpayer. [80%]
B. A penalty resulting from premature withdrawal of funds from a certificate of deposit (CD). [12%]
C. Fees received for jury duty that are remitted to the taxpayer's employer. [5%]
D. Tuition for courses taken by a self-employed insurance agent that are required to maintain licensure in the taxpayer's state of residence. [3%]
1. Who is the plaintiff?
2. What issue did they bring to the court?
3. Who is the defendant?
4. What was their defense?
5. Who won the case?
estate of Melvin w Ballantyne, Deceased.(T.C.M. (CCH)2002-160(2003)
Answer:
2003) case opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. ... The Estate of Melvin Ballantyne and the executrix, Jean Ballantyne ... it generated; however, by virtue of the arrangement to pay one-half of ... The court noted that a partner must take into account his "distributive share" for each item of
Explanation:
Edge 2020
Where does Hamlet Act 2 Scene 1 take place?
Scene 1: Polonius summons his astute servant Reynaldo and orders him to spy on Laertes in Paris. Hamlet orders the servant to track down any Danes in Paris and question them about Laertes'.
Whereabouts and reputation. Reynaldo sends his servant Reynaldo to France with money and written notes for Laertes, as well as instructions to inquire about and spy on Hamlet' personal life. He gives him specific instructions on how to conduct his investigations and then sends him on his way. "A room in Polonius' house," from Act 2, Scene 1 of Shakespeare's Hamlet, is an example of the setting.
To learn more about Hamlet, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30104887
#SPJ4
In civil suits, any aggrieved party can sue another and, if damages are awarded they go to the harmed party. Where a crime is concerned:
In civil suits, any aggrieved party can sue another party to seek legal remedies and, if successful, receive damages or other forms of compensation. The purpose of a civil suit is to address disputes between private individuals or entities and to provide a resolution for the harmed party.
On the other hand, in criminal cases, the legal proceedings are initiated by the government or state against an individual or entity accused of committing a crime. The objective of criminal cases is to establish the guilt or innocence of the accused and, if found guilty, impose penalties or sanctions determined by the legal system.
In criminal cases, the damages or penalties imposed are not awarded to the harmed party as in civil suits. Instead, they are intended to serve the interests of justice, maintain societal order, and deter future criminal behavior. The penalties in criminal cases can include fines, probation, imprisonment, community service, or other forms of punishment, depending on the severity of the offense and the jurisdiction in which the case is being prosecuted.
It is important to note that civil and criminal cases are distinct legal processes with different objectives, standards of proof, and potential outcomes.
To know more about crime here
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ11
true or false? the professor uses the phrases the law of ideas and intellectual property law interchangeably.
Answer:
true or false? the professor uses the phrases the law of ideas and intellectual property law interchangeably.
false
Thinking about the circular flow of income and the data you just analyzed, compose one well-written paragraph that
shows how you can apply the circular flow of income to the questions you just answered. In your writing, be sure to use
proper economic terminology, such as the labels in the circular flow model e.
Answer:
Circular flow of income is a theory that states that economy is a system of dependencies, flows of goods, services, factors of production and payments between all participants of economic life. It shows how the exchange process works, in which the government, enterprises, and households participate.
Households are fed by streams of payments in the form of wages, pensions and other similar benefits. Then they dispose of their income in such a way that they return some of the streams in the form of taxes, some leave as savings, in return for which they receive services and goods of public interest. The remaining stream of payments after these operations is passed back to enterprises (as a result of the purchase of goods and services).
Businesses, like households, spend part of their income on taxes and savings, receiving in return government investment from the state. Businesses obtain streams of labor and production services from households and can therefore produce goods.
Answer:
As consumer spending increased, less savings were placed in the financial sector. This resulted in reduced business investment. The government also spent less, meaning it injected less money into the economy. There was a trade deficit because imports were greater than exports. This means there was more leakage through imports than there was money injected through exports.
Explanation:
edmentum
Which of the following is not a method for gaining access to records? A. Asking the client to provide the record. B. Legal research tools such as Westlaw and LexisNexis. C. Writing a letter of demand to the record holder. D. Have the client sign a form granting you authority to access the record.
Legal research tools such as Westlaw and LexisNexis are not a method for gaining access to records, as stated in option B.
The other three options, asking the client to provide the record, writing a letter of demand to the record holder, and having the client sign a form granting authority, are valid methods for gaining access to records.
Option B, legal research tools such as Westlaw and LexisNexis, is not a method for gaining access to records. These tools are primarily used for conducting legal research and accessing legal databases that contain statutes, case law, and other legal materials. They are not means of directly obtaining specific records from clients or record holders.
On the other hand, the other three options listed are valid methods for gaining access to records. Asking the client to provide the record is a common method where the client voluntarily provides the requested record to the legal professional handling their case.
Writing a letter of demand to the record holder is another method for gaining access to records. This approach involves formally requesting the record holder, such as a government agency, medical provider, or other relevant entity, to release the requested record. The letter typically includes the necessary details and reasons for the request.
Having the client sign a form granting authority is also a valid method. This involves obtaining the client's consent through a legal document or form that authorizes the legal professional to access the records on their behalf. This method ensures that the legal professional has proper authorization and protects the confidentiality and privacy of the client's information.
Learn more about Legal research here : brainly.com/question/14469292
#SPJ11
Discuss the legalities of using ruses and pretexts to gain confidential information regarding a target from sources. What are
appropriate deceptive plays and which ones should be illegal? Why? Explain and support your answer.
Pretexting is the act or practice of gaining information about a subject by misrepresentation or under false pretenses. Pretexting is capable to leaving companies involved open to liability claims
The need to understand when pretexting is illegal within federal and state laws, how pretexting has been interpreted by the courts, the type of pretexting that are legal but also not advisable, as well as steps to take against being pretexting when investigative tasks are outsourced
The use of pretext to obtain telephone records or financial information is explicitly against federal law and pretexting used for criminal purposes are stopped by prosecutors using other existing federal laws
However, pretexting in the form of undercover investigation is completely legal, provided the investigator does not present them selves as a person of authority
Learn more about using ruses and pretexting to obtain confidential information here:
https://brainly.com/question/9321150
https://brainly.com/question/14049478
A party who seeks to rescind a contract must notify the other party in a timely fashion.
a. true
b. false
describe the sources of education law
Answer:
Education Law can be difficult to research at times because there are federal and state laws, regulations, cases, and administrative decisions that can determine a particular legal issue. Federal law, whether statutes or regulations passed by the Department of Education, often directs the States to comply with certain requirements. The means of compliance, though, may be left up to the States, or it may be ambiguous whether the federal law requires certain standards. If you are interested in a specific state, it is best to research both that state's applicable laws and the federal laws.
Explanation:
Hope it helps :)
Pls mark brainliest <3
`
`
`
Tori
don one decides to use his personal name for a line of clothing he is developing. in this instance, don one will receive trademark protection under the law when:
The correct option is b. Don One will receive trademark protection under the law when customers begin to associate the name with the source of the product.
A trademark is a form of intellectual property that consists of a recognisable sign, design, or expression used to identify goods or services as coming from a specific source and set them apart from those offered by other parties. The owner of a trademark may be an individual, a company, or another legal body. A trademark could be found on the product itself, on a label, a voucher, or a box. Service marks are another name for trademarks that distinguish services. A trademark's owner has the right to file a lawsuit to prevent infringement. For this kind of action to be pursued, official trademark registration is typically a need.
Don One decides to use his personal name for a line of clothing he is developing. In this circumstance, Don One will receive trademark protection under the law when a. Don begins to market his line of clothing. b. customers begin to associate the name with the source of the product. c. Don begins to make his line of clothing. d. all of the choices.
Learn more about trademark here:
https://brainly.com/question/19534317
#SPJ4
Yukiko says to basil "im going to sell my car for $500. " basil replies, alright here is the money ill take it. Was there a contract being made or no
Yes, a contract has been made between Yukiko and Basil.
Based on the information given in the question, Yukiko and Basil have come to an arrangement to sell Yukiko's automobile to Basil for $500. Yukiko offered to sell the automobile, and Basil said, "Alright, here is the money, I'll take it," indicating that he was willing to do so. This serves as the foundation of a verbal agreement in which Yukiko offered to sell her automobile to Basil for $500 and Basil agreed to pay the sum in question.
Verbal agreements are generally enforceable in law, however, there may be restrictions and conditions that must be met based on the laws of the particular area. It is usually advised to have a formal contract for significant transactions in order to prevent future misunderstandings or disagreements.
Read more about contract on:
https://brainly.com/question/27899951
#SPJ4
: Case Study Joe is 57 years old single person works at a local hardware store for 30 years. He is looking to retire in 3 years and travel around the globe. His house valued at $350,000 is paid off and his only investment is a pension plan with the employer which will be sufficient to meet his living expenses. He doesn't have much experience and knowledge about investments. He came to see you with a cheque of $82,000 which he got for his winning lottery ticket. He is looking to invest these funds to use for traveling during this retirement age. His friends told him that his money may lose purchasing power by 2.10% every year if he didn't invest it. His investment objective is to protect the purchasing power and some growth of his money. Case Study You may choose any combination of the following investments to design his portfolio: 5 Years High Rate GIC at 1.90% . 3 Years Bonus Rate GIC at 1.5% . CIBC Money Market Fund with an average annual historical return of 0.90% . CIBC Bond Fund with an average annual historical return of 6.10% . CIBC Dividend Fund with an average annual historical return of 7.15% CIBC Global Equity Fund with an average annual historical return of 12.35% a) Identify major features of his KYC b) Design an investment portfolio c) Explain why it is good portfolio for him.
The main aspects of Joe's KYC (Know Your Client) are his age (57), his intention to retire and travel in three years, his lack of financial expertise and experien c.
The desire to preserve the purchasing power of his money while pursuing some growth. b) Joe's investing objective and risk tolerance must be taken into account while creating his investment portfolio. A diversified portfolio with a blend of fixed-income and equity investments can be taken into consideration given his objectives of safeguarding his purchasing power and seeking growth.You have described Joe's investment objective as preserving the purchasing power of his money while pursuing some growth. Additionally, you mentioned that his risk tolerance should be considered when creating his investment portfolio. Based on these objectives and risk tolerance, a diversified portfolio with a blend of fixed-income and equity investments could be a suitable option for Joe.Fixed-income investments, such as bonds or Treasury securities, can help preserve the purchasing power of Joe's money by providing a steady income stream and relative stability. These investments typically offer more predictable returns compared to equity investments, which can help mitigate the risk of losing purchasing power.
learn more about financial expertise here :
https://brainly.com/question/30173472
#SPJ11
what offers protection to citizens from unreasonable intrusions in their lives by law enforcement?
Citizens are protected by the United States Constitution from arbitrary law enforcement intrusions into their lives.
Local, state, and federal law enforcement organizations often fall into one of three categories. Police and sheriff departments are examples of local law enforcement organisations. The state or highway patrol is one example of a state agency. The FBI and the US Secret Service are examples of federal agencies. Protection is one of the purposes of police power. Police authority is restricted to what is required for protection because, if misused, it may also breach protection. The majority of law enforcement employees wear uniforms. They patrol and respond to requests for assistance. They might control traffic at a fire scene, look into a break-in, or administer first aid. Community policing is receiving increased attention from urban police departments.
Know more about the United States Constitution at: https://brainly.com/question/13954588
#SPJ4
What is the difference between income and wealth? How do people obtain wealth in the United States?
-Sociology
Educational staff in corrections facilities help inmates _____.
Answer:
Educational staff in corrections facilities help inmates improves the chances of being released from prison.
An attorney negligently gives erroneous “curbstone advice” to his client. Can he be held liable for mis-representation? Buttersworth v. Swint, 186 S.E. 77 (Va. 1936)
In the case of Buttersworth v. Swint, 186 S.E. 77 (Va. 1936), the specific details and facts of the case are necessary to provide a comprehensive analysis. However, based on the information provided, it appears that the attorney in question may potentially be held liable for misrepresentation if certain conditions are met.
To determine liability for misrepresentation, several factors are typically considered, such as the attorney-client relationship, the nature of the advice given, and the consequences of relying on that advice. Additionally, the specific laws and regulations governing legal ethics in the jurisdiction where the case occurred would play a role in assessing liability.
At the pretrial conference the parties discuss settlement, and if they cannot reach one, then the attorneys and judge discuss: ________. (Choose ALL the correct answers)
At the pretrial conference, if the parties are unable to reach a settlement, the attorneys and judge may discuss several issues related to the upcoming trial. Some of the topics that may be discussed include:
The possibility of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods: The judge and attorneys may explore the possibility of using alternative dispute resolution methods such as mediation or arbitration to resolve the case without going to trial.
The scope and schedule of discovery: Discovery refers to the process of gathering evidence prior to trial. The judge and attorneys may discuss the scope and schedule of discovery, including deadlines for producing and exchanging documents, responding to interrogatories, and depositions.
Pretrial motions: Either party may file pretrial motions seeking to exclude evidence or dismiss part or all of the case before trial. The judge and attorneys may discuss any pending motions or the possibility of filing additional motions.
Jury selection: If the case will be decided by a jury, the judge and attorneys may discuss the process for selecting jurors and any potential challenges to particular jurors.
Trial logistics: Finally, the judge and attorneys may discuss the logistics of the trial itself, including how long it is expected to last, whether it will be held in front of a jury or just the judge, and any other practical considerations.
In summary, at the pretrial conference, if the parties cannot reach a settlement, the attorneys and judge may discuss a range of issues related to the upcoming trial, including alternative dispute resolution, discovery, pretrial motions, jury selection, and trial logistics.
learn more about pretrial conference here
https://brainly.com/question/31443867
#SPJ11
Which of the following is
a way to psychologically measure criminal behavior