The law requiring vehicle owners to carry insurance policies with minimum coverage limits of $10,000 dollars of PIP
and PDL is the
Florida No-Fault Law.
Florida Financial Responsibility Law.
Move Over Act.
Traffic Law.
answer: A
Answers
Answer:
Florida No-Fault Law
Explanation:
Related Questions
Step 1: Thinking About the Questions
Regardless of the career field you ultimately select, the interview questions will be very similar. Interviewers want to gain a picture of your experience, skills, and strengths and weaknesses no matter what job you are interviewing for.
Take a look at this list of common interview questions and choose five that you will focus on for this activity. Then, provide these five questions to the friend or family member who will be interviewing you in Step 2.
For each of your chosen questions, write down the question and an ideal answer using a word processing program. Then practice answering the questions in front of a mirror until you feel confident. Remember, you want to sound natural, so keep in mind the basics of your ideal answer but don't memorize it word-for-word.
Review the unit for additional tips and tricks to prepare yourself for your mock interview. You want to appear confident and well-prepared.
Step 2: Answering the Questions
Set up a video camera or cell phone with video recording capabilities to capture the mock interview and ensure that your “interviewer” has a copy of the five interview questions that you selected.
Just as in a true interview, the interviewer should ask you one question at a time and you should answer. If your interviewer feels that they need to ask a follow-up or clarifying question, they can do so.
Step 3: Reflecting on the Experience
After your mock interview, use the same word processing file where you noted your interview questions to reflect on the interview process by answering these questions:
What went well during the mock interview?
What could have gone better? How can you apply these lessons to a future interview?
Was your preparation for the interview sufficient or would you prepare more intensely in the future? Explain your answer.
Submit a copy of the word processing document with your writing from Step 1 and 3 as well as the video recording of the mock interview to the dropbox.
Answers
Step 1: Thinking about the questions is crucial in preparing for an interview. Common interview questions help assess your experience, skills, strengths, and weaknesses.
To prepare, select five questions, write down an ideal answer for each, and practice in front of a mirror to sound natural and confident.
Step 2: Answering the questions involves setting up a video recording of a mock interview with a friend or family member. They will ask you the selected questions one by one, and you will answer them.
Step 3: Reflecting on the experience is important to improve your interview skills. After the mock interview, analyze what went well, what could have gone better, and whether your preparation was sufficient. Submit the word processing document with your writing from Steps 1 and 3, along with the video recording of the mock interview.
For more question on skills
https://brainly.com/question/1773542
#SPJ11
Which rank does David seem to hold in the given scenario? David works in the police force. He is mainly in charge of crime prevention, detection, and maintaining order. He works at the rank of a .
Answers
Answer:An undercover detective
Explanation:Undercover detective are involved in cre prevention detection by making sure that they bring down what ever organization that are involved in criminal activities. They get into those organization and find all the evidence on every thing that they are doing illegally and they take part in arresting these criminals
I am doing a follow up case on the Dadeville shooting in alabama. The suspects were charged with 4 counts of reckless murder. More charges will be filed. Going based off of the 4 counts what is the recommended sentencing based on alabama state law?
Answers
.
Some general factors that would influence sentencing recommendations include:
• The specifics of the charges (e.g. reckless murder vs. 1st degree murder) and the number of charges. More/lesser charges would impact sentencing.
• Alabama sentencing guidelines which provide ranges for different types of felonies based on offense levels. Reckless murder would likely fall into a higher offense level.
• The criminal history of the offenders. Prior criminal records could increase recommended sentences.
• Circumstances of the crime. Especially aggravating factors could warrant longer sentences.
• Discretion of the judge. Sentencing ultimately comes down to the judge's discretion within the applicable laws and guidelines.
Without knowing the details of the Dadeville shooting case, charges, criminal histories of the offenders, and judge's sentencing philosophy, I cannot determine precise recommended sentences for the 4 reckless murder charges. The sentences could range from many years to potentially life imprisonment, depending on the factors.
The best approach is to review the specific laws on reckless murder sentencing in Alabama, the guidelines, details of the charges and offenders in this case, and decisions in similar previous cases to help determine an appropriate recommendation range for each charge. But there are too many unknowns based on the information provided for me to give more precise recommendations. Please let me know if you have any other questions.
Identify a problem for which we need a law.Explain you're answer
Answers
Answer:
The outline including its given subject is listed throughout the subsection below on interpretations.
Explanation:
Laws should be enforced defining the appropriate behavior, and therefore we must obey this series of morality to keep the system safe as well as stable
Several difficulties involve legal counsel assistance. A childhood custody dispute will be yet another illustration. Such sorts of incidents are constitutional litigation, which also involves a lawyer concentrating on community legal practice.Based on your reading of the following description of the confusion caused by public-private partnerships, what is the best summary statement of the issue?
Private security services have grown in number, profitability and importance over the past decade. The 2001 terror attacks on New York and Washington, D.C. robbed many Americans of a sense of security and, as a result, a market was created for private security services that reintroduced a sense of safety and well-being. Traditionally, communities looked to their local police department to provide the appropriate level of security and safety. Those communities lacking the financial resources to increase significantly the number of police officers regularly patrolling the streets turned to private security contractors to fill the gap between the current strength of the police department and the level of security the community identified as necessary and appropriate. The result has been the creation of a number of public-private partnerships that result in an often uneasy alliance between police departments and private security firms. While there are a number of factors that distinguish the sworn law enforcement officer from his or her private security counterpart, none is more significant than their respective obligations to uphold the provisions of the Constitution. If the roles and responsibilities of private security personnel are to continue to grow in importance to local communities, it will become increasingly important to determine whether these citizen police share the same ethical and legal responsibility to protect individual rights as the sworn police officer.
Responses
Since 9/11, private security groups are much more active in taking on police force tasks in attempts to control threats to national security.
Since 9/11, private security groups are much more active in taking on police force tasks in attempts to control threats to national security.
Since 9/11, the boundaries between the states have disappeared and the federal government has declared, in times of national disaster, all state private security agencies are deputized to act as law enforcement.
Since 9/11, the boundaries between the states have disappeared and the federal government has declared, in times of national disaster, all state private security agencies are deputized to act as law enforcement.
Since 9/11, the manner in which private security assists public forces to control order and security in the United States has broadened which makes responsibility boundaries less clear, but it opens access for more trained protection services at times of state or to federal threat.
Since 9/11, the manner in which private security assists public forces to control order and security in the United States has broadened which makes responsibility boundaries less clear, but it opens access for more trained protection services at times of state or to federal threat.
Since 9/11, the Constitution, the federal government, the states’ law enforcement and city forces have authority to request assistance from private security whose training allows them to act as police in national disasters.
Answers
Based on the reading of the following description of the confusion caused by public-private partnerships, the best summary statement of the issue is that the roles and responsibilities of private security personnel have expanded in importance to local communities, leading to an often uneasy alliance between police departments and private security firms, which raises questions about whether they share the same ethical and legal responsibility to protect individual rights as the sworn police officer.
The passage describes the growing importance of private security services after the 9/11 terror attacks, which created a market for private security services to reintroduce a sense of safety and well-being.
Private security contractors have been employed by communities lacking financial resources to increase the number of police officers patrolling the streets, leading to the creation of public-private partnerships that result in an often uneasy alliance between police departments and private security firms.
The passage highlights the significance of the obligations of the sworn law enforcement officer and the private security personnel in upholding the provisions of the Constitution.
If the roles and responsibilities of private security personnel are to continue to grow in importance to local communities, it will become increasingly important to determine whether they share the same ethical and legal responsibility to protect individual rights as the sworn police officer.
Hence, the correct answer is that the roles and responsibilities of private security personnel have expanded in importance to local communities, leading to an often uneasy alliance between police departments and private security firms, which raises questions about whether they share the same ethical and legal responsibility to protect individual rights as the sworn police officer.
For more question on police departments
https://brainly.com/question/26085524
#SPJ8
What are some of the things the
party wants to happen, if they're
elected?
Answers
Note that the dominant parties in the US want the following:
Dems: Govt programs to support equality & social welfare, action on climate change.
Reps: Limited govt, lower taxes, conservative values.
What is the explanation for the above response?The two major political parties in the United States are the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. The Democratic Party generally advocates for policies such as expanding access to healthcare, increasing taxes on the wealthy, investing in renewable energy, supporting labor unions, protecting voting rights, and providing a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.
The Republican Party generally advocates for policies such as lowering taxes and government regulation, promoting free market capitalism, increasing military spending, restricting access to abortion, and protecting gun rights. Both parties have different ideas and approaches to addressing the country's challenges, and their policies and proposals often reflect their respective ideologies and values.
Learn more about political party at:
https://brainly.com/question/12401053
#SPJ1
i don't need help but why do you need to pay for pemium
Answers
Answer:because the people are greedy and want more money they cant just help lol
Explanation:
The fine for a first time littering ticket is
up to:
$250
Answers
Because yes and ys
Que es la capacidad de hecho y de ejercicio. concepto de cada una de ellas, clasificación y características de cada una del tipo de capacidad
Answers
Answer:
La capacidad de ejercicio es la capacidad de actuar legalmente, por ejemplo, para celebrar contratos. Una persona adquiere total independencia al cumplir los 18 años, es decir, al cumplir los 18 años. Un menor no es totalmente independiente, sólo es competente para aquellas acciones legales que, por su naturaleza, son objetivamente apropiadas a la madurez intelectual y libre de sus pares. Antes de alcanzar la mayoría de edad, la plena autonomía se adquiere al emanciparse o contraer matrimonio.
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answers
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
what car did the suspects use to commit the dc sniper crimes
Answers
The suspects used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the DC sniper crimes.
The suspects in the DC sniper crimes, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the shootings. The car was modified to create a concealed shooting platform in the trunk, allowing the perpetrators to carry out their attacks covertly. The choice of this vehicle played a significant role in the nature of the crimes and their ability to evade detection.The use of the Chevrolet Caprice enabled the suspects to blend in with other vehicles on the road, making it difficult for witnesses and law enforcement to identify them during the shootings. The dark blue color and unremarkable appearance of the car further aided their efforts to remain inconspicuous. This strategic choice allowed the perpetrators to carry out their attacks without arousing immediate suspicion or drawing attention to themselves.The vehicle became a key element in the investigation, as authorities issued alerts and descriptions of the car in an effort to track down the suspects. The extensive media coverage of the vehicle and its connection to the crimes heightened public awareness and helped in the eventual capture of the perpetrators.In conclusion, the suspects in the DC sniper crimes used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan, which played a crucial role in facilitating their shootings and evading detection.For more questions on DC sniper crimes
https://brainly.com/question/30170344
#SPJ8
1. Why do humans put off car maintenance?
O It's inconvenient
O It's expensive
O Our brains think it's a low priority
Answers
Answer:
it is expensive
Explanation:
it is expensive
How would you cope with changes in the family relationship during lockdown?each answer ,also indicate how improving these coping skills could help you to accept the changes
Answers
In recent changes in the family relationship during lockdown is communication, new schedule, caring, stress free as they indicate how improving these coping skills to accept changes.
What is relationship?The term relationship was to maintain the bond of the person. The relationship was the maintain the feeling of the one person to the another person. At least two members on involved relationship.
A recent pandemic on many changes is the build the relationship with family.
Communication: Communicate with the family members and involved the family problems.Create new routines: It was the new agenda as the different from daily life.Caring: To help the strange and poor people.As a result, as they concluded the changes in lockdown are the aforementioned.
Learn more about the relationship, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23752761
#SPJ9
need help please its for forensic science
Answers
The us constitution prohibits the enactment of ___laws which makes acts committed before the laws in question were passed punishable as crimes
Answers
The US constitution prohibits the enactment of Ex post facto law.
An ex post facto law is a statute that alters the legal ramifications of deeds that were done or connections that were made before the legislation was passed.Ex post facto laws are ones that apply retroactively and penalize behavior in ways that were not previously possible. Such a legislation hurts the person it affects and relates to things that happened before it was passed.Legislatively adopted new laws typically only have an impact on behavior in the future. The term "retroactive laws" refers to situations in which legislation has an impact on matters that are now before the courts or actions that took place before the law was passed.Thus this is the meaning of Ex post facto law.
Refer here to learn more about Ex post facto law: https://brainly.com/question/2498364
#SPJ1
HELP PLEASE HURRY
Why do religious groups tend to be the major critics of privatized prisons?
a. The groups believe the private prisons are funded by the gambling industry.
b. The prisons are seen as immoral and unethical.
c. The groups have questions about the prison cleanliness and maintenance.
d. The prisons are believed to be ungodly.
Answers
Answer:
I believe its A
Explanation:
Answer:
Because the groups are seen as immoral and unethical
Explanation:
im taking the test and looked it up
Which of the following is NOT acceptable to use as proof of insurance when you’re stopped by the police?
A. Paper Florida insurance ID card
B. Electronica proof on your phone
C. Electronica proof on your passengers phone
D. A recent call from your insurance provider
Answers
guessing
D. call from insurance provider
the longer your travel distance, the more likely you are to encounter
Answers
Answer:
Hazards
Explanation:
Just took the test!!
Answer:unexpected hazards
Explanation:driving longer and in places your not familiar with your more likely to come upon unexpected hazards. :)
Can you hit someone wth your car if they try to carjack you?
100 points lol
Answers
Answer:
yes you can
Explanation:
its called payback
You cannot hit someone with a car if they carjack you because it is illegal and u will legit go to jail. lol
Mr. Peters has a legal handgun to protect his home against intruders and against the increasing crime in his neighborhood. One night, Takeshi, a 16 year old Japanese exchange student, walks up Mr. Peters’ driveway looking for a party. Takeshi thinks Mr. Peters is hosting the party and begins yelling and waving his arms. Mr. Peters gets scared, retrieves his handgun, and points it at Takeshi while yelling “Freeze!” Takeshi does not understand English and keeps walking toward Mr. Peters. Thinking he is an intruder, Mr. Peters shoots and kills Takeshi at the front steps of his house. Mr. Peters is charged with first-degree muder. Does he have a defense?
Answers
Answer: In this scenario, Mr. Peters may argue that he acted in self-defense. Self-defense is a legal defense that allows an individual to use reasonable force in order to protect themselves from an imminent threat of harm. However, whether Mr. Peters's actions were reasonable under the circumstances could be debated.
A key factor that may be considered is whether Mr. Peters had a reasonable belief that Takeshi posed an imminent threat of harm to him. Mr. Peters may argue that he was scared and believed that Takeshi was an intruder, based on the fact that Takeshi was yelling and waving his arms. However, the fact that Takeshi did not understand English, and was not responding to Mr. Peters's commands may indicate that Mr. Peters should have realized that Takeshi was not an immediate threat.
Another important factor that may be considered is whether Mr. Peters's use of deadly force was reasonable under the circumstances. In this case, it could be argued that shooting Takeshi was not a reasonable response, as there may have been other options that Mr. Peters could have taken to protect himself, such as calling the police or using non-lethal force.
In general, whether Mr. Peters has a defense will depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the case, and how these facts are presented and evaluated in court.
Explanation:
What is the impact of incorporation?
a The Supreme Court has included local court judges to help rule on certain cases..
b The Supreme Court has applied certain rights from the Bill of Rights to the state governments.
c The Supreme Court has requested that appeals lawyers combine similar cases into one review.
d The Supreme Court has determined that its rulings will only apply to the state in which the case began.
Answers
The most basic responsibility that comes with borrowing money from a bank
is:
O A. recommending other customers to the bank.
OB. paying off the loan as quickly as possible.
OC. making all required payments on time.
D. using the same bank for all future loans.
Answers
The most basic responsibility that comes with borrowing money from a bank is making all required payments on time. Option C
What is most basic responsibility that comes with borrowing money from a bank?This means that the borrower must adhere to the agreed-upon repayment schedule and fulfill their financial obligations by making regular payments as outlined in the loan agreement.
When individuals borrow money from a bank, they enter into a financial agreement and are obligated to repay the borrowed amount according to the agreed-upon terms. Making all required payments on time is essential to fulfill this responsibility and maintain a good credit history.
Learn more about credit history at https://brainly.com/question/30191672
#SPJ1
when you experienced impaired judgment
Answers
Answer:
Please elaborate more so that it is possible for people to be able to answer your question.
Explanation:
What are the three rights are people guaranteed according to the preamble?
Answers
Answer:
right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Explanation:
Help pls different types of paperwork and professional documents which are required for firefighters
Answers
Answer:
Firefighter paperwork can vary. As others have noted, daily check off sheets, maintenance requests, and maybe the station log. Now, if the firefighters are certified as EMTs and run medical calls, generally each call will require a run report. That could be done by the officer or properly trained firefighters.
Which court process describes when a juvenile case goes to trial, where both attorneys present evidence, questions witnesses and discuss the case?
Adjudicatory hearing
Intake review
Arraignment
Disposition hearing
Answers
Answer:
Adjudicatory hearing
Explanation:
An adjudicatory hearing is the juvenile court's version of a trial. In an adjudicatory hearing, both parties present information so that the judge may examine the case.
Here is an excerpt from a recent news story from the New York Times: Use this for both this question and the one that follows.
"A federal appeals panel on Thursday unanimously rejected President Trump’s bid to reinstate his ban on travel into the United States from seven largely Muslim nations, a sweeping rebuke of the administration’s claim that the courts have no role as a check on the president.
The three-judge panel, suggesting that the ban did not advance national security, said the administration had shown “no evidence” that anyone from the seven nations — Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen — had committed terrorist acts in the United States.
The ruling also rejected Mr. Trump’s claim that courts are powerless to review a president’s national security assessments. Judges have a crucial role to play in a constitutional democracy, the court said."
Which option correctly describes the type of check and balance that is reflected in the passage above?
A ) The judicial branch is checking the legislative branch.
B ) The executive branch is checking the judicial branch.
C ) The judicial branch is checking the executive branch.
D ) The legislative branch is checking the executive branch.
Answers
The form of check and balance that is portrayed is the judicial branch monitoring the executive branch.
What checks and balances are provided by the executive branch?A statute may be vetoed by the President in the executive branch, but the legislative branch may overturn the veto with a majority of votes. The legislative branch has the authority to impeach and remove the president, approve presidential appointees, and monitor the budget.
What does "system of check and balance" mean?The concept of checks and balances mandates that different branches of government share power and have the ability to veto other branches' actions. Checks and balances are often only utilised by constitutional governments.
To know more about judicial branch visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30704871
#SPJ1
EMERGENCY! 20 pts :)
This type of case is usually settled out of court, and the defendants are not found "guilty." The significance of these court cases is that they settle disputes between parties. What type of court case is described above?
A.
trial case
B.
civil case
C.
criminal case
D.
juvenile case
Answers
Hope this helps.
QUESTIONS
2. When you are sharing the road with a bicyclist or motorcyclist, you should:
A. Always allow them to share your lane
B. Expect them to yield the right-of-way to cars
C. Treat them as you would treat any driver
Answers
Explain, in simple terms, the Idaho constitution’s amendment vi.