the law requires parties to be fair and reasonable in the making of a contract. group of answer choices false true

Answer:

C a forensic sociologist

Explanation:

they talk to the police and the citizens.

The best profession, which helps in building the relationship between the police and the citizens is a forensic sociologist. Hence, Option D is correct.

Being a forensic sociologist, an individual will be engaged in the activity of analyzing the shreds of evidence and also keeps the research that is related to criminal cases or civil cases.

It is the duty of the forensic sociologist to make sure that not a single piece of evidence will be neglected during the whole investigation. For keeping a track of all the things, forensic sociologists maintain the relationship between the police and the citizens.

Sometimes people often get confused between forensic sociology and criminology. They both are having different sciences. Forensic sociology is an applied science. On the other hand, criminology is a specialized social science.

Thus, Option D is correct.

Learn more about forensic from here:

https://brainly.com/question/14403044

#SPJ2

Given that almost half of all property crimes are committed by juveniles who have previous arrests and convictions, it is likely that the juvenile justice system is not a successful model.

The success of the juvenile justice system is a highly debated topic and can be evaluated from various perspectives.

The high rate of recidivism among juveniles with previous arrests and convictions suggests that the system has not been successful in addressing the root causes of juvenile crime. In order to improve the success of the juvenile justice system, ongoing evaluation and refinement of policies and practices are needed.

Find out more on the juvenile justice system at https://brainly.com/question/11399114

#SPJ1

Federal district courts have jurisdiction over cases involving citizens of more than one state because the Constitution grants them diversity jurisdiction.

The purpose of diversity jurisdiction is to ensure that out-of-state parties can receive a fair trial in a neutral forum, without any bias or prejudice that might arise in state courts. Additionally, diversity jurisdiction allows for uniformity in the interpretation and application of federal law across different states.

This means that federal courts can hear cases between citizens of different states or between citizens of a state and citizens or subjects of a foreign state.

Diversity jurisdiction is also important because it allows parties to choose the forum in which to bring their case. If a party believes that they may not receive a fair trial in state court due to local biases or conflicts of interest, they can seek to have their case heard in federal court.

Read more on federal courts here:https://brainly.com/question/25947870

#SPJ1

U.S. courts of appeals are considered as the federal court system's intermediate appellate courts.

The correct answer is option B.

An appellate court is any court that hears appeals from lower courts, which have the authority to review a previous decision made by a lower court. Appellate courts operate similarly to trial courts, but they do not re-hear testimony or admit new evidence. Instead, they review the trial court's legal procedures and the findings of fact to determine whether the decision was correct.

The appellate courts' roles are critical in the legal system, as they have the authority to declare laws unconstitutional and to set legal precedent by interpreting and applying the law to new situations. Thus, appellate courts can fundamentally shape American law.

The intermediate appellate courts are situated above the district courts and below the highest appellate court (the Supreme Court). U.S. courts of appeals are considered as the federal court system's intermediate appellate courts.

Therefore, option B is correct.

For more such questions on federal court, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/13750271

#SPJ11

Answer:

Politeness

Explanation:

If someone is rude, they are generally considered unpolite. This does not speak to their loyalty, honesty, or generosity.

The statement is incorrect. A federal court may become involved in property disputes that fall under federal law, but they do not typically decide how property will be distributed.

In most cases, property distribution is determined by state law or by a person's own estate planning documents, such as a will or trust. In the absence of a will or trust, state laws of intestacy will govern the distribution of assets. It is possible that a person's closest relative may receive all or a portion of their property, but this would be determined by state law, not federal law. A federal court may become involved in property distribution if there is a dispute involving federal law or if the case falls under its jurisdiction. However, in most cases, property distribution is determined by state law. If there is no will, your closest relative typically receives your property according to the state's intestacy laws, not federal law.

To know more about federal court, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31037815

#SPJ11

Answer:

LEOKA

Explanation:

Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA) Program. Through the Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA) Data Collection, the FBI provides data and training that helps keep law enforcement officers safe as they protect the nation's communities.

LEOKA is the part of the Uniform Crime Report might contain useful data for Ilan to share with the mayor. Hence, option D is correct.

For use by law enforcement, the Uniform Crime Reporting Program produces accurate information. Additionally, it offers information to the general public, the media, scholars, and criminal justice students. Since 1930, the program has been producing crime statistics.

The FBI's Uniform Crime Report "murder and nonnegligent manslaughter" data are so gravely erroneous that the only information they can give criminologists is the number of deaths that have been investigated by police as possibly being criminal homicides and the statistics on weapon use that have been reported by the UCR and the National Crime Survey.

A record of crimes reported to law enforcement agencies is kept in the Uniform Crime Report. The F.B.I. is in charge of data collection. compared to crimes that have not been solved.

Thus, option D is correct.

For more information about Uniform Crime Report, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14450134

#SPJ2

The given statement "the final question of the blanchard-peale "three part test", has to do with conscience" is False because the final question of the Blanchard-Peale "Three-Part Test" does not specifically pertain to conscience. The three questions of the test, developed by Dr. Kenneth Blanchard and Dr. Norman Vincent Peale, are as follows:

Is it legal?

Is it balanced?

How does it make you feel?

These questions are meant to guide individuals in assessing the ethical implications of a decision or action they are considering. The third question, "How does it make you feel?", focuses on evaluating the impact of the decision on one's personal values, sense of integrity, and emotional well-being. It encourages individuals to consider whether the decision aligns with their personal beliefs and values.

To know more about conscience refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/31245942

#SPJ11

The major factors that go into how judges make decisions in their cases. are

Generally, A judge is an individual who presides over the proceedings that take place in a court of law, either on their own or as a member of a panel of judges.

The judge will listen to all of the witnesses as well as any additional evidence that may be provided by the prosecution or the defense. On the basis of the evidence that has been provided as well as in compliance with the law, the judge will make a determination as to whether or not the accused individual is guilty. In the event that the accused is found guilty, the court will subsequently impose the appropriate penalty.

Read more about judge

https://brainly.com/question/1059156

#SPJ1

Answer:

Monarchs receive their power hereditarily. Dictators are one single person that has authority over an entire nation. A king or queen receives their power through a line of succession, whereas a dictator does not. In a dictatorship, the voices of those who are being dictated are often oppressed. A dictator has total and complete power.

Explanation:

Answer:

If the driver's statement was voluntarily obtained by the police without duress, then the statement will be admissible.  But, if otherwise, it cannot be admitted.  Such self-incriminating statements are usually used as evidence for police to arrest a suspect, but to convict.  This is why at the point of arrest, the suspect is read his or her "rights to remain silent."

Explanation:

It is the responsibility of the trial judge to determine any issues as to the statement's voluntariness. This implies that the confession can be admitted into evidence if the judge determines that the confession was voluntarily made by the driver.  The judge will not admit the statement if it is determined that there were some use of threats of force, violence, or intimidation on the part of the police to obtain the self-incriminating confession.

Answer:

What?

Explanation:

You didn't explain your question at all please just tell me what is going on and I can see if I can help you.

Answer:

ji

Explanation:

Answer:

fact

Explanation:

I've learned this before and I know its fact

Answer:

The Criminal Defense of Mistake

In many situations, a criminal defendant may wish to argue that he or she never intended to commit a crime and that the criminal act that occurred was a result of a mistake of facts regarding the circumstances of the crime or a misunderstanding concerning the law at the time. Such mistakes of fact can be applied to a variety of criminal activities, but mistakes of law are only rarely allowed as full defenses to criminal conduct.

Mistakes of Fact

Mistakes of fact arise when a criminal defendant misunderstood some fact that negates an element of the crime. For instance, if an individual is charged with larceny but believed that the property he took was rightfully his, this misunderstanding negates any intent to deprive another of the property. One important qualification, however, is that this mistake of fact must be honest and reasonable. Thus, a defendant cannot later claim that he or she was mistaken when he or she actually knew the situation. Likewise, the mistake must be one that would appear reasonable to a judge or jury. If the same individual was repeatedly told that the property was not his, and he could not take it, it would no longer be reasonable for him to mistakenly have believed that he could rightfully take the property.

Mistake of Law

Mistake of law is a defense that the criminal defendant misunderstood or was ignorant of the law as it existed at the time. The onus is generally placed on individuals to be aware of the laws of their state or community, and thus this defense only applies in very limited circumstances. For example, while a defendant will not be able to claim that he was not aware that murder was a crime, he may be able to argue that he was not aware of some obscure traffic law.

Specifically, mistake of law can be used as a defense in four limited circumstances:

When the law has not been published;

When the defendant relied upon a law or statute that was later overturned or deemed unconstitutional;

When the defendant relied upon a judicial decision that was later overruled; or

When the defendant relied upon an interpretation by an applicable official.

Additionally, the defendant’s reliance on any of these sources must have been reasonable, much like mistake of fact. Thus, a defendant cannot claim that he was relying on a case from 200 years ago when it is apparent that there have been subsequent developments in the law.

It is also important to note that, while reliance on an interpretation of an official may include judges or federal or state agencies, it does not include reliance on the statements of a private attorney. It is therefore important to ensure that any attorney from whom you obtain advice is knowledgeable and trustworthy.

Mistake and Strict Liability

Mistake is not a defense to a strict liability offense. For example, Raquel lives in a jurisdiction in which the sale of alcohol to minors is a strict liability offense. She does her best to check identification whenever selling alcohol at her store. Doug, age 17, presents Raquel with a convincing fake I.D. and otherwise appears to be over 21. If Raquel sells Doug alcohol, she could be guilty of selling alcohol to a minor, even though she reasonably and honestly believed that Doug was old enough to purchase it.

Answer:

The three-strikes law significantly increases the prison sentences of persons convicted of a felony who have been previously convicted of two or more violent crimes or serious felonies, and limits the ability of these offenders to receive a punishment other than a life sentence.

Explanation:

pls mark as brain list

Even After Marriage Contract will be valid and that contract for diving assets is known as prenuptial agreement

A prenuptial agreement catalogues each person's property, assets and debts, and specifies each person's rights to that property if the marriage dissolves or if someone dies. While prenups are best known for dividing assets at divorce, they can also be used as a type of will.

A prenuptial agreement isn't just for wealthy people, though it's often used to protect a person’s wealth from a partner if there is a divorce. Those who are just starting their careers might also execute a prenup; it can help clarify financial and property issues, including debt repayment, should the union end. That can help make a divorce process less expensive and less painful for both parties.

What is a prenup?

A prenup contract may include:

To learn more about prenup visit here ; https://brainly.com/question/26030510?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

The key reason for the creation of law courts during the early development of English common law was basically to provide a fair and efficient system for resolving disputes and enforcing laws in the country.

The common law system, that developed in England in the Middle Ages, played a greater emphasis on the role of judges in making decisions based on custom, precedents, and reason, rather than relying solely on written laws or edicts from a monarch. It further led to the creation of law courts to hear and decide these cases, and also established a legal precedents that would guide future decisions.

The overall development of the English common law system and its various courts helped in creating a more stable and predictable legal framework, it also played a key role in the growth and development of English society.

To know more about English common law refer to-

brainly.com/question/7413269#

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

Agency by estoppel is a legal principle that arises when a principal, by their words or conduct, leads a third party to believe that another person (the agent) has the authority to act on their behalf. When this happens, the principal may be bound by an unauthorized contract made by the agent, even if the principal did not intend to give the agent authority to act.

The reason for this is that the third party, who reasonably relied on the principal's words or conduct, would suffer unfair harm or loss if the principal was allowed to deny the agent's authority after the fact. Therefore, agency by estoppel is designed to prevent unjust outcomes and promote fairness in commercial transactions.

For example, suppose a company's CEO tells a vendor that their sales manager has the authority to purchase goods on behalf of the company up to a certain amount. If the sales manager later exceeds that amount and the company refuses to pay, the vendor may be able to hold the company liable for breach of contract through an agency by estoppel. This is because the vendor relied on the CEO's representation of the sales manager's authority and would suffer harm if the company were allowed to deny it.

In summary, an agency by estoppel holds a principal liable for the actions of an agent, even if the agent's authority was not explicitly granted, to prevent unfairness and promote reliance in commercial transactions.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Answer:

so true

Explanation:

a) Ralph could void and rescind the contract with Sid the car because of fraud.

He had already paid Sid the sum of $25,000 for the car, whose mileage, horsepower, and engine condition were fraudulently misstated.

b) Ralph could take legal action against Sid to recover value for the fraudulent misstatements.

Thus, Ralph should immediately sue Sid to void the contract or recover damages.

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/10084927

Answer:

the action by the state or an authority of taking property from its owner for public use or benefit:

Explanation:

Federal law currently bans the sale of kidneys. This effectively establishes a maximum legal price for kidneys of $0. This is called a price ceiling. Because of the ban, doctors may use only donated kidneys for transplants.

If the Fed buys securities using Open Market Operations, this will B. Increase money supply.

Open Market Operations (OMO) is a frequently employed instrument utilized by the Federal Reserve (the Fed) to modify money circulation.

Through buying securities, such as Treasury bills or government bonds, from banks, the Fed elevates their reserves. Subsequently, this augmentation heightens the provision of finance available to businesses and consumers, allowing more funds to enter the economy, thus enlarging its monetary supply.

Find out more on Open Market Operations at https://brainly.com/question/14256204

#SPJ1

ANSWER:

Law is a practical discipline because it is a discipline that guilds ones action, and define the rules one have to observe in taking an action

Contract law is the law that binds an agreement between two parties with a mutual intension. This law enforces what each party have to offer to the other, and what the penalty will be if one should offend the agreement.

These law can be use to describe law to be practical because the agreement which the law enforces, are their actions toward each other. These actions are described as the conducts which is abide by the contract enforced by the law.

Example; Mr Obi and Mr Michael signed an agreement to exchange their smart phone with each other. But also agreed that anyone who's smart phone is faulty when exchanged, will pay a fine and return back the phone he collected.

The law that enforces this agreement in the example above is called a contract law. This is a practical example of law, because it is law that abides their actions in the exchange of phone and passing out penalty.

Here, Community structures refers to an uniformed & authorized way of buildings layout, road routes, railroad etc, which follows the community plan.

In conclusion, the involvement of this plan is important in solving burglaries problems because its instills Fear of security and thus discourage attempted burglary from occupant of the community.

Read more on this here

brainly.com/question/24447737