Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The 14th Amendment is an amendment to the constitution of the United States of America and it addresses the issue of civil and legal rights for the African American citizens and slaves who had gained freedom after the American Civil War. The 14th Amendment is made up of the clause known as the equal protection of the laws.
An equal protection is a clause that states and guarantees that no state and local governments shall make or enforce any law which would contravene the privileges, rights or immunities of all persons born or naturalized in the United States of America.
Simply stated, the equal protection guarantees that all citizens will be treated equally by the law. Also, the equal protection clause took effect in the United States of America in 1868.
T/F the pluralism view of the american political system has a generally positive view of how government functions.
The pluralist view of the American political system has a generally positive view of how government functions are true.
The Constitution establishes a form of government that is a federal democratic republic. In another sense, we are an unbreakable union of 50 separate States. In a democracy, the populace controls the government. It is representative because people chose representatives in some kind of a free and secret election.
The parliamentary, executive or judicial branches of the federal government may be addressed by Congress, the Presidency, and Federal judges, respectively, under the terms of the U.S. Constitution.
Articles of the Constitution. The United States' first constitution, known also as the Articles of Confederation was written in 1777. They formally established the Continental Congress's processes and power. The States of America was a federation of states.
Learn more about the American political system here:
https://brainly.com/question/30106542
#SPJ4
mock juries benefit the trial lawyers when the actual trial and jury selection takes place because:
Mock juries benefit trial lawyers in several ways when the actual trial and jury selection takes place. First, mock juries help trial lawyers to identify potential biases and attitudes of jurors towards their case.
This information allows them to create a more effective jury selection strategy and to weed out potential jurors who may be prejudiced against their client.
Second, mock juries provide trial lawyers with an opportunity to test their arguments and trial strategies in a simulated setting. This allows them to refine their arguments and identify potential weaknesses in their case before going to trial.
Finally, mock juries can help trial lawyers to predict the outcome of the actual trial. By observing the deliberations and decision-making process of the mock jury, trial lawyers can gain insights into how the actual jury may decide the case. This information can help them to adjust their strategy and arguments to increase their chances of winning the case.
Mock juries benefit trial lawyers during the actual trial and jury selection process because they provide valuable insights into potential juror reactions, help identify strong arguments and potential weaknesses, and allow for refinement of the case presentation. This ultimately leads to better preparation and increased chances of a successful outcome in the actual trial.
Visit here to learn more about juries : https://brainly.com/question/9788151
#SPJ11
List the people involved in Carmela Coppilino’s death. Why is there a possible problem with her death certificate?
How did William Farber die? Was there a problem with his death certificate?
Why was Dr. Coppolino charged with the murders of his wife and William Farber?
Why was Dr. Coppolino not convicted of William Farber’s murder?
What did Dr. Umberger do to prove Dr. Coppolino’s guilt?
How would the “Frye Standard” be applied in this case?
What was the final ruling in Dr. Coppolino’s 2nd trial?
The case against Dr. Coppolino for his wife’s murder was tried under the Dauber Ruling? Why was it resolved the way it was? Compare it to the first.
This question is about the text "Dr. Coppolino's Deadly House Calls"
Answer and Explanation:
1. The possible people involved in Carmela's death are her husband Dr. Carl Coppolino and Dr. Karrow. That's because they probably gave a fake death certificate on Carmela's death. This is because when Dr. Karrow arrived home, Carmela was already dead and did not appear to have had a heart attack (as her husband had stated. On the contrary, it seemed that her death had been caused, but even so Dr. Karrow agreed to sign a state of death stating that Carmela had died of "coronary occlusion".
2. William Farber died of suffocation by the hands of Dr. Carl Coppolino, who used a pillow to kill Faber. he did this because Faber's wife had an affair with him and was unable to give her husband a lethal injection. The injection was given by Carl himself.
3. Because Marjorie Farber told the police how Carl murdered her husband and why he did it. The police then launched an investigation and realized that William Faber's death certificate indicated death from "coronary occlusion," a death that is rarely investigated by the police. After that, the police managed to obtain authorization to carry out the bodies of Camela and William Farber for an autopsy to be done, confirming that both did not die of "coronary occlusion," the police therefore decided to accuse Dr. Coppolinode of murdering his wife and William Farber.
4. Marjorie Farber had an affair with Dr. Carl Coppolino and decided to report it because she was sad when he decided to marry a wealthy socialite. She was portrayed in court as an embittered woman against a respected and professional doctor, which lightened her complaint. Furthermore, no chemical substances were found in William Farber's body, although there were indeed signs of strangulation. In the end Coppolino was not convicted because he was a professional doctor, while Marjorie was a betrayed and sad woman.
5. He proved that Carl Coppolino injected his wife with succinylcholine chloride. This substance is paralyzing and deadly, but its identification in the body is almost impossible, because it is degraded by two substances that happen naturally in the human organism. So Dr. Umberger created a new method to detect this substance. He managed to isolate, in Camelia's body, very high levels of succinic acid, which is a strong indication of the use of succinylcholine chloride
6. The Fryer standard would accept the process applied by the doctor as proof of Umberger's guilt. That's because Dr. Umberger was a toxicology expert and the Fryer standard states that within a trial, an expert's opinion should be accepted as evidence if he can use a scientifically recognized technique to prove the point, like Dr. Umberger did.
7. After presenting the facts discovered by Dr. Umberger, Dr. Coppolino was found guilty of the murder of his wife and was convicted of second-degree murder.
8. We can consider that the case was tried within the Dauber Ruling, as it considered Dr. Umberger's methodology as a proof of Coppolino's guilt. However, the case of the murder of William Farber was also investigated by an expert, but it did not have the same result, probably for sexist reasons.
This is an LSAT practice questions.
I need help answering the questions. Please do a step-by-step- explanation. I prefer that you draw out the game to help me understand the question.
Jason enters six races: biking, canoeing, horseback riding, ice skating, running, and swimming. He places between first and fifth in each. Two places are consecutive only if the place numbers are consecutive. Jason's places in canoeing and running are consecutive. His places in ice skating and swimming are consecutive. He places higher in biking than in horseback riding. He places higher in canoeing than in running.
1. If Jason places higher in running than in biking and places higher in biking than in ice skating and swimming, which one of the following allows all six of his race rankings to be determined?
A. He places fourth in horseback riding.
B. He places fourth in ice skating.
C. He places the same in both horseback riding and ice skating.
D. He places the same in both horseback riding and swimming.
E. He places higher in horseback riding than in swimming.
2. If Jason places higher in running than in biking and places higher in horseback riding than in ice skating, exactly how many of his rankings can be determined?
A. 2
B. 3
C. 4
D. 5
E. 6
3. Assume that Jason's rank in running is higher than his rank in ice skating and consecutive with it, and that his rankings in swimming and running differ. Which one of the following must be true?
A. Jason places both first and second.
B. Jason places both first and third.
C. Jason places both second and fourth.
D. Jason places both second and fifth.
E. Jason places both fourth and fifth.
The following allows all six of his race rankings to be determined: He places fourth in horseback riding. Thus option (A) is correct.
What is horseback riding?Horseback riding, also known as equestrianism, is the skill or sport of riding horses. It involves controlling and guiding a horse and to communicate with the horse and direct its movements.
Horseback riding can be done for various purposes, including transportation, recreation, competitive sports, and therapy. It has a long history and is practiced in many cultures around the world for a variety of purposes, such as transportation, agriculture, warfare, and sport.
He places fourth in horseback riding is consistent with all the given clues and allows us to determine all six of Jason's race rankings. Therefore, option (A) is correct.
Learn more about horseback riding here:
https://brainly.com/question/9637871
#SPJ2
Explain the four reasons for introducing a community policing style.
Four reasons why a state my introduce a community policing style are;
Creating a more positive image of the local police agency.Increasing trust between the police and the general public.Improvement of reliable information from residents about illegal activities in their locality.The development of a better knowledge of people's aspirations and their chances of being policed.Community policing is an organizational concept that supports the methodical use of partnerships and problem-solving tactics to proactively address the present conditions that give birth to public safety concerns such as crime, social dysfunction, and fear of crime.
Learn more about Community Policing:
https://brainly.com/question/3177078
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP ASAP
Which situation shows the president acting as head of state?
Question 7 options:
sending troops into combat
appointing members of the cabinet
delivering a budget to Congress
awarding a medal to a war hero
Answer:appointing members of cabinet
Answer:
The answer is (B) (appointing members of the cabinet)
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
How did the ruling in kumho tire v. Carmichael affect how expert witness testimony would be accepted?.
The ruling in Kumho Tire v. Carmichael affected how expert witness testimony would be accepted by making it clear that the same standards applied to all expert witnesses, regardless of their area of expertise.
Kumho Tire v. Carmichael was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1999. It was a significant case because it clarified the admissibility criteria for expert witness testimony. The case was about a fatal accident that was caused by a blown-out tire, and the victims' families filed a lawsuit against Kumho Tire Co.
The plaintiffs retained an expert witness to testify that the tire was defective, and it was the reason for the accident. The trial court excluded the expert witness testimony, stating that the expert was unqualified to render an opinion on the tire's design and the defect that caused the blowout. The plaintiffs appealed the decision, and it was overruled by the appellate court, stating that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of the expert. The case was appealed again, and it reached the US Supreme Court.
The US Supreme Court upheld the appellate court's decision to overrule the trial court's decision to exclude the expert testimony. However, they set new rules for the admissibility of expert witness testimony. According to the ruling, the trial judge was the gatekeeper of expert testimony, and it was their responsibility to evaluate the relevance and reliability of expert testimony. The court further stated that the Daubert standard, which had previously applied to scientific testimony, would also apply to all expert testimony.
Learn more about Witness
https://brainly.com/question/32240223
#SPJ11
what best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses? Instead of being thirteen republics, under a federal head, [the Federalists' plan] is clearly designed to make us one [unified] government. . . . Whether such a change can ever be [made] in any manner; whether it can be [made] without convulsions and civil wars; whether such a change will not totally destroy the liberties of this country—time only can determine.
-The Federal Farmer
The best summary of the point of view the excerpt expresses is that the Federalists' plan is intended to establish a single, centralized government, and that it is unclear
if this will be achieved without causing unrest and resulting in a loss of liberties for the country.The excerpt presents a perspective against the idea of a single, unified government as proposed by the Federalists. The writer feels that such an approach would be a change that is too radical for the country, and one that would be accompanied by convulsions and civil wars. Moreover, it is uncertain whether such a change would destroy the liberties of the country. Time is the only factor that can provide an answer to these questions.The Federal Farmer's text explains that the Federalists' plan would establish a single government rather than thirteen republics. The plan of the Federalists is clearly designed to unite the country under one government. However, the Federal Farmer argues that the United States should remain divided rather than following the Federalists' plan to become one nation. It is difficult to determine whether such a change can be made in any way and without convulsions and civil wars. Additionally, it is uncertain if such a change would not completely destroy the liberties of the United States.
To know more about Federalists visit:
https://brainly.com/question/267094
#SPJ11
Binding versus Persuasive Authority. A county court in Illinois is deciding a case involving an issue that has never been addressed before in that state’s courts. The Iowa Supreme Court, however, recently decided a case involving a very similar fact pattern. Is the Illinois court obligated to follow the Iowa Supreme Court’s decision on the issue? If the United States Supreme Court had decided a similar case, would that decision be binding on the Illinois court? Explain. (See The Common Law.)
Answer:yes it would be
Explanation:
A demurrer is: a. a legal pleading that contains denials, admissions, affirmative defenses, and counterclaims. b. a pleading that is a statement of the initial claim against the defendant. c. an assertion that even if the plaintiff's allegations are true, the plaintiff would not be entitled to a remedy. d. a judgment against a defendant who fails to respond to a complaint.
A demurrer is an assertion that even if the plaintiff's allegations are true, the plaintiff would not be entitled to a remedy. The term “demurrer” means “a hesitation or an objection.
Demurrers are formal objections raised by a defendant in response to a plaintiff’s complaint in a civil case. Demurrers request the court to rule that the plaintiff has failed to state a viable legal claim in his or her complaint. Demurrers dispute the legal sufficiency of a complaint and, more specifically, assert that even if the allegations of the complaint are true, the plaintiff would not be entitled to a remedy.
Demurrers test whether the plaintiff’s claim has the required elements to constitute a legally recognized cause of action. Demurrers are commonly used by defendants to avoid having to answer a complaint on its merits. If a demurrer is sustained, the plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without leave to amend.
To more know about demurrer visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30651277
#SPJ11
John, William, and Peter are partners in a business that sells soft drinks. In terms of their partnership agreement, only John may contract with outsiders on behalf of the partnership. Should he wish to enter into an agreement where the value exceeds R10 000, he must obtain the prior consent of William and Peter. John buys a speedboat in the name of the partnership for R80 000 without the knowledge of his partners. William concludes a contract on behalf of the partnership for the purchase of a fridge to store the soft drinks, without the knowledge of his partners. The purchase price of the fridge is R20 000.
Explain whether the contracts concluded by John and William respectively would be binding
The contracts concluded by John and William respectively would not be binding on them because there was no prior knowledge from the other partners as it exceeded the amount and William is not entitle to sign any contract.
What is a partnership agreement between two companies?A business partnership agreement is known to be a kind of legal document that exist when two or more business partners engage in a business structure.
Here, the responsibilities of the business is shared by each partner, and also capital contribution, partnership property, is shared with them.
Learn more about contracts from
https://brainly.com/question/984979
The law of which country provided the roots for U.S. law?
Answer:
Background. At both the federal and state levels, the law of the United States was mainly derived from the common law system of English law, which was in force at the time of the Revolutionary War. However, U.S. law has diverged greatly from its English ancestor both in terms of substance and procedure.
Are those groups comprised of criminally minded individuals who have used the internet to communicate, collaborate, and facilitate cybercrime?
Cybercriminal Organizations are comprised of criminally minded individuals who have used the internet to communicate, collaborate, and facilitate cybercrime.
Cybercrime is any criminal activity that targets or uses a computer, computer network, or connected device. Most cybercrime is perpetrated by cybercriminals or hackers looking to make money. However, sometimes cybercrime aims to damage computers and networks for reasons other than profit. Cybercrime is a crime involving computers and networks.
Your computer may have been used in a crime or targeted. Cybercrime can put your personal security and financial well-being at risk. Fraud and identity theft (although the increasing use of malware, hacking, or phishing has made it an example of both "computer-targeted" and "computer-as-a-tool" crimes) Information warfare. Phishing - Betrug. spam.
Learn more about cybercrime here
https://brainly.com/question/13109173
#SPJ4
On February 2019, Melinda applies and nominates herself for the prestigious North American Literary Prize. In June 2019, she wins the prize for her academic and literary works. The award comes with a $1,000,000 cash prize that Melinda then donates to the City of Denver. Melinda is not required to take any action after receiving the cash prize. Is Melinda required to include the cash award in Gross Income?
Answer:
Melinda is required to include the cash prize in the Gross Income.
Explanation:
Gross Income is the total payment in cash, goods and services that a person received before tax reductions, that is, it is the general value of everything that a person received in a given period of time, including wages, premiums, real estate, among other things . In this case, we can confirm that the cash prize received by Melinda must be included in her Gross Income, in addition, if she has received a prize with an economic value, she must also include this prize in the Gross Income, even if she has donated .
Whose job is it to protect the judge and others in the courtroom?
a) Police Officers
b) Bailiffs
c) Sheriffs
d) Special Agents
Answer:
B
Explanation:
A police officer is struggling to arrest a man who has just assaulted a shopkeeper you see the police officer kneeling on the detainee’s back to handcuff him. The man is shouting and complaining that the officer is hurting him, but the officer continues to kneel on his back while wrestling to overcome him.
Discuss whether the officer has contravened the fourth principle.
Answer:
I don't maybe because police officer is smart
2.4 Which department/organization would you approach if your human rights have been
violated?
(2)
Answer:
The human rights commission.
Explanation:
The human rights commission is the organisation or department to approach if the human rights had been violated. A human rights commission, also known as a human relations commission, is a body set up to investigate, promote or protect human rights.
Which international conflict resulted from tensions between the US and Soviet Union A)Cuban missile crisis B)the Vietnam war C) the Korean War D) The bay of pigs invasion
Answer:
The bay of pigs invasion
Explanation:
The Bay of Pigs Invasion in April 1961 was a failed attack launched by the CIA during ... Bay of Pigs: President Kennedy and the Cold War ... with the Soviet Union, and the United States responded by prohibiting the ... In 1962, the Cuban missile crisis inflamed American-Cuban-Soviet tensions even further.
1. Explain your answers to the following questions:
• Why is public order necessary?
2. Does society have enough public order or too little?
roe v. wade and other major court cases often make their way through the court system ending with the court of final appeal, more commonly known as
There are three main levels to the federal court system: district courts, which are the trial court, circuit courts, which are the first level of appeal, and the Supreme Court of the United States, which is the last level of appeal in the federal system, are the three levels of appeal.
What is the court's final decision?
the final court decision that settles all disputed issues and the parties' rights in relation to those issues. The only decisions left after a final judgment are how to enforce the judgment, whether to award costs, and whether to appeal.
What are the three ways that an appeal to the Supreme Court can be handled?
appeals through state and federal courts, appeals through the original jurisdiction.
Learn more about Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ4
Select the correct answer. Steven wants to become a member of the labor union. Which law gives him the right to do so? a. Civil rights act b. Fair labor standards act c. Occupational safety and health act d. Wagner act e. Equal pay act.
If Steven wishes to join a union, the Wagner Act will grant him the ability to do so. The right answer is (d).
It required employers to engage in collective bargaining with unions chosen by a majority of the workers in a suitable bargaining unit, and it granted employees the right to create and join unions under Section 7. Employees would have the "right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid and protection," according to Wagner of New York.
The Wagner Act was fiercely opposed by Republicans and big business, and it was challenged in court as an unconstitutional intrusion by the federal government in sectors of the economy that Congress had no authority to regulate because it violated the "freedom of contract" of employers and employees. The National Labor Relations Act of 1935, sometimes referred to as the Wagner Act, is a key piece of American labor legislation that protects employees working in the private sector's ability to form unions, participate in collective bargaining, and take collective action like strikes.
Learn more about Wagner act visit: brainly.com/question/9320709
#SPJ4
Gilbert wants to initiate a suit against Healthways Insurance Company by filing a complaint. The complaint should include
The thing which the complaint should include is b. a statement alleging the facts showing the court has jurisdiction.
What is a Lawsuit?This refers to the class action that is filed by a person or company against another in a law court, seeking redress.
Hence, we can see that based on the tenets of law, if Gilbert wants to initiate a lawsuit against Healthways Insurance Company by filing a complaint, he should include a statement alleging the facts showing the court has jurisdiction.
Read more about lawsuits here:
https://brainly.com/question/1184001
#SPJ1
Business activities are at times governed by criminal law
O True
O False
Answer: False
Explanation: Criminal law is relevant to business because crime presents real threats. When crimes are committed, people are injured. Criminal behavior is punishable by law. Risks to business posed by crime arise from the losses suffered from the criminal activities of those on the outside of the business organization, as well as those on the inside. Corporations themselves can be liable for crime when an employee working within the scope of employment commits crime that benefits the corporation, or when the corporation itself commits crime.
monsters are monsters in my book
Answer:
David rossi
Explanation:
Answer:
.
Explanation:
2. Do you think imprisonment is the only way to rehabilitate a person who violated a law? Why or why not
Answer:
Imprisonment is not the only way to rehabilitate a person who violated the law, since there are alternative penalties to prison, such as fines, bonds, jobs and collaborations in non-profit social entities and victim reparation systems. In all these cases, the defendant receives a penalty, but this is not the prison but an alternative to it, which still puts him at a disadvantage compared to the rest of society as a result of his non-compliance of the law, but due to the low severity of the crime, the defendant does not deserve a prison sentence.
hich often means a more thoughtful presentation of ideas?
Answer:
no
Explanation:
(Case Study Question) Because Henry has a history of heart disease, he is concerned that his poor health may leave him incapacitated in the future. He would like to give his oldest child the right to make medical decisions if he is so ill he is unable to make them himself. Which of the following documents would accomplish this?
A) Living will
B) Power of appointment
C) Living trust
D) Durable power of attorney for health care (DPOAHC)
The document that would accomplish Henry's goal of granting his oldest child the right to make medical decisions on his behalf if he becomes incapacitated is option D) Durable power of attorney for health care (DPOAHC).
A Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care is a legal document that allows an individual (the principal) to designate someone (the agent or attorney-in-fact) to make healthcare decisions on their behalf if they become unable to do so themselves. This document ensures that Henry's wishes regarding his medical treatment and care are respected and followed, even if he is unable to communicate or make decisions.
Unlike a living will, which only specifies a person's preferences for end-of-life care, a DPOAHC grants broader decision-making authority to the designated agent. It allows the agent to make medical decisions in a variety of situations, not just limited to end-of-life care.
By selecting the Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care, Henry can ensure that his oldest child has the legal authority to act as his healthcare advocate and make important medical decisions on his behalf if he becomes incapacitated due to his poor health.
Learn more about attorney here:
https://brainly.com/question/31861735
#SPJ4
how have courts reacted on the ground that the hardships of nuisance abatement that would be imposed on the polluter and on the community, are relatively greater than the hardships suffered by the plaintiff.
Courts responded on the grounds that the burdens of nuisance abatement that would be placed on the polluter and the community required courts to set regulations that assured that polluters would never be required to abate their nuisances past the point where they could no longer be tolerated.
The eradication of a problem by the party who has suffered without resorting to legal action is referred to as abatement of nuisance. The law does not favor this type of remedy, but is accessible in specific situations.
Occasionally, a plaintiff's latent sensitivity or susceptibility to more severe harm causes the plaintiff's injuries on abatement of nuisance to be far worse than those that would have been sustained by a typical individual.
Therefore, the nuisance abatement reassured that polluters wouldn't ever be obliged to stop their annoyances before they were intolerable.
Learn more about the nuisance abatement, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/17751112
#SPJ4
which amendment preserves the right to a trial by jury in civil cases?
Answer:
The Seventh Amendment
Explanation:
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.