The given statement that "The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act makes it illegal for employees of U.S. companies to make ""questionable"" or ""dubious"" contributions to political decision makers in foreign nations." is true because this act prevents the people or the companies from bribing the government officials.
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of the year 1977 which is also known as the FCPA is basically a United States federal law which prohibits the U.S. citizens as well as the entities from bribing the foreign government officials in order to benefit the interests of their business.
The FCPA is basically applicable worldwide and it extends specifically to the publicly traded companies as well as their personnel which include employees, shareholders, officers, directors, and agents.
To know more about The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
https://brainly.com/question/30626255
#SPJ4
Explain the impact of negligent misrepresentation on a contact.
Answer:
Misrepresentation is about giving of inaccurate information by one party (or their agent) to the other before the contract is made which induces them to make the contract. If a person makes a contract in reliance on misrepresentation and has to face loss as a result, they can revoke the contract or claim damages.
Based on the Reality TV Controversies Case, discuss the power of reality television content. a) Why does it upset potential viewers? b) What new law would you propose to address the controversy? Be as specific as possible.
The power of reality television content lies in its ability to captivate audiences and generate strong emotional reactions.
However, it can also upset potential viewers for several reasons.
a) Reality TV can upset potential viewers due to its sensationalism, manipulation of participants, and the blurring of ethical boundaries. The focus on conflict, drama, and personal struggles often leads to the exploitation and humiliation of individuals for the sake of entertainment. This can be emotionally distressing and raise concerns about the impact on the mental health and well-being of the participants.
b) To address the controversies surrounding reality television, a new law could be proposed that establishes stricter regulations and safeguards to protect the rights and well-being of participants.
This law could include specific provisions such as:
Mandatory psychological assessments: All participants must undergo thorough psychological evaluations before and during their involvement in reality TV shows. This would ensure that individuals with pre-existing vulnerabilities or mental health issues are not exploited or put in potentially harmful situations.
Clear consent and disclosure requirements: Production companies must obtain informed and explicit consent from participants, clearly explaining the potential risks and consequences of their involvement. Participants should be fully aware of how their personal information and actions may be portrayed or manipulated for the purposes of the show.
Independent monitoring and support: An independent body or ombudsman should be established to monitor reality TV shows, ensuring compliance with ethical guidelines and providing support to participants during and after filming. This would help address concerns about manipulation, bullying, and exploitation.
Transparency in editing and portrayal: Production companies should be required to disclose any significant editing or manipulation of content that could misrepresent participants or create false narratives. This would promote transparency and authenticity in the portrayal of individuals on reality TV.
Penalties for violations: The law should establish clear penalties for production companies that violate the regulations, including fines, license suspensions, or legal consequences, to serve as deterrents and ensure compliance.
By implementing such a law, it would provide a framework for responsible and ethical production practices in the reality television industry, protecting the rights and well-being of participants while addressing the concerns and controversies associated with the genre.
To know more about violations, click here https://brainly.com/question/31558714
#SPJ11
Under the U.S. System of government
the judiciary has the power:
To Create legislation
• To enface laws using police powers
• To interpret the constitutionality of lands
Nominate Justices to the Supreme Court.
Under the U.S. system of government, the judiciary has the power to interpret the constitutionality of laws and nominate Justices to the Supreme Court.
Under the U.S. system of government, the judiciary does not have the power to create legislation. That authority is granted to the legislative branch of government, specifically Congress. The judiciary's primary role is to interpret and apply the law, including the Constitution. They have the power to interpret the constitutionality of laws, which means they can determine whether a law complies with the provisions of the Constitution. This power is known as judicial review. Additionally, the judiciary does not enforce laws using police powers. Law enforcement falls under the executive branch, which includes agencies such as the police and the Department of Justice. However, the judiciary does play a role in interpreting laws and ensuring their enforcement through the adjudication of cases. The President, as part of the executive branch, has the authority to nominate Justices to the Supreme Court, but those nominations must be confirmed by the Senate.
For more such question on Supreme Court
https://brainly.com/question/31448958
#SPJ
a police officer spotted a middle-aged male sitting on a bench in a public park. the officer did not recognize the man, but was aware that the park was frequently used as a site for illegal drug transactions. the officer approached the man who remained seated on the bench. the officer asked the man for his name. when the man refused, the officer arrested him. under state law, it is a misdemeanor for an individual to intentionally refuse to give his name to a police officer who, having lawfully detained the person, has requested it. although a search of the man revealed that he did not possess any drugs, he was charged and convicted of violating the law and fined. the man appealed, challenging his conviction as a violation of his rights under the federal constitution. should the appellate court rule in favor of the man?
In this case, it appears that the man was arrested and convicted for refusing to provide his name to the police officer, which is a misdemeanor offense under state law.
The appellate court would need to examine whether the man's Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure were violated during the encounter with the police officer. They would assess whether the officer had reasonable suspicion or probable cause to detain and request the man's name, and whether the subsequent arrest and conviction were lawful.
In general, courts consider various factors to determine the reasonableness of a search or seizure, including the specific circumstances, the officer's knowledge, and the individual's behavior. If the court determines that the officer lacked reasonable suspicion or probable cause to detain the man and request his name, they may rule in favor of the man and overturn his conviction, potentially on the grounds that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated.
However, it is essential to consult with a legal professional or refer to relevant case law and statutes to understand the specific legal principles and standards that would be applied in this situation. Legal outcomes can vary based on the jurisdiction and the specific details of the case.
To know more about state law here
https://brainly.com/question/15218412
#SPJ4
On April 1, 2017, the Department of Offense (DOC) awarded U.S. Tobotics, Inc. (USTI) a contract to manufacture and deliver 100 tobots at a total price
of $5,439,783.72. The terms of the contract required that fire-proof insulated wiring harnesses containing 20 gauge palladium plated copper wire be
utilized for all electrical wiring in the tobots. The contract also contained a provision that permitted USTI to make suggestions for cost savings and
improvements thereby entitling USTI to a bonus if the changes were accepted by the DOO. In 2019 the 100 tobots were delivered to the DOO,
In 202, the DOO awarded USTI another contract for an additional 100 tobots under the same terms as the prior contract except the price was now
$7.751,348.37. Due to the price and scarcity of pallidum, USTI consulted with its engineers and determined that platinum plated copper wire would be
a viable substitute, USTI did not inform the DOO about the change or the cost savings,
In 2021, U.S. Tobotics delivered the non-conforming 100 tobots to the DOO and requested payment under the contract. DOO engineers discovered
the substituted wiring and the DOO withheld $2,57,628.95 in order to replace the wiring in the 100 tobots.
USTI protests the withheld payments but loses their protest then fles a lawsuit in an attempt to recover the additional funds. How and why would you
rule on this case if you were the judge? (hint; there is a case that is quite similar to this fact pattern).
As a judge in this case, I would rule in favor of the Department of Offense (DOO), denying U.S. Tobotics, Inc. (USTI) the recovery of the withheld payments. My decision would be based on the principle of material breach of contract.
The original contract between DOO and USTI required the use of fire-proof insulated wiring harnesses containing 20-gauge palladium-plated copper wire for all electrical wiring in the robots. However, USTI substituted the required palladium-plated copper wire with platinum-plated copper wire without informing the DOO or seeking their approval for the change.This unauthorized change in the wiring material constitutes a material breach of contract, as it affects the overall quality and performance of the robots. The DOO had a legitimate reason to withhold payment to cover the costs of replacing the non-conforming wiring in the delivered robots.Furthermore, the contract contained a provision allowing USTI to suggest cost-saving measures and improvements, with the possibility of earning a bonus if the DOO accepted the changes. USTI did not follow this procedure and proceeded with the substitution unilaterally.In conclusion, based on the material breach of contract by USTI and their failure to follow the contract's provision for suggesting cost-saving measures, I would rule in favor of the DOO and deny USTI's claim for the withheld payments.
To know more about payments visit:
brainly.com/question/31087641
#SPJ11
Pretend you are an African American man living in 1870 in the United States. Describe two ways in which the 14th Amendment might have affected your life. Write in the first person, and create a name for your imaginary person
Answer:
Explanation:
My name is Elijah Washington, and I am an African American man living in the United States in 1870. The 14th Amendment has had a profound and transformative impact on my life, empowering me in ways I never thought possible.
Firstly, the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause has shattered the chains of inequality that bound us for far too long. With this revolutionary clause, I now have a legal shield against the insidious discrimination and unequal treatment that plagued our society. It declares that no state shall deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This powerful language has emboldened me to challenge the systemic injustices that have stifled our progress. Whether facing racial segregation, unequal access to public facilities, or discriminatory employment practices, I can wield the Equal Protection Clause as a sword of justice, demanding fair treatment and equal rights.
Secondly, the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause has bestowed upon me the long-awaited recognition and dignity of being a true American citizen. For generations, African Americans like myself were denied the basic rights and privileges of citizenship. But with the stroke of a pen, the 14th Amendment has finally acknowledged our inherent right to belong. As a citizen, I now possess the unassailable armor of legal protection. I am entitled to due process, ensuring that the wheels of justice shall turn for me as they do for anyone else. I can exercise my newfound political power, actively participating in the democratic process, and working towards dismantling the chains of prejudice and injustice that still linger.
The 14th Amendment has become our collective anthem of freedom, an unwavering testament to the resilience and fortitude of our community. It has emboldened us to march forward, forging a path towards true equality. While I recognize that the battle for justice is far from over, the 14th Amendment has ignited a fire within our hearts, reminding us of the promise and potential that lie within each of us. Through the Equal Protection Clause, we have the power to challenge the darkest corners of prejudice, ensuring that our children and grandchildren will grow up in a world where they are judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. Through the Citizenship Clause, we have claimed our rightful place in this nation, ready to reshape its destiny and build a more inclusive society for all. As an African American man in 1870, I stand proud, shoulder to shoulder with my brothers and sisters, knowing that the 14th Amendment is our beacon of hope, guiding us towards a brighter and more just future. Together, we will overcome the challenges that lie ahead, forging a path of equality, freedom, and unparalleled achievement. The 14th Amendment has forever changed the trajectory of our lives, and we will seize this opportunity to reshape our destiny and inspire generations to come.
At night, if an oncoming vehicle fails to dim its high beams, what should you do?
Focus on the right side of the road, follow the lead of other drivers, reduce your speed, and increase the distance between yourself and the oncoming vehicle to ensure your safety when an oncoming vehicle fails to dim its high beams at night.
If an oncoming vehicle fails to dim its high beams at night, it can be very dangerous and cause temporary blindness, making it difficult for you to see the road ahead. However, there are a few things you can do to reduce the risk and ensure your safety.
Firstly, avoid looking directly at the oncoming headlights as this can make the situation worse. Instead, focus on the right side of the road to guide your vehicle safely. Additionally, if there are other cars around, try to follow the lead of the other drivers and dim your own high beams in response.
If these measures are not enough, you can also reduce your speed and increase the distance between yourself and the oncoming vehicle. This will give you more time to react to any unexpected hazards or obstacles on the road.
Remember, it's important to stay calm and focused while driving at night. If an oncoming vehicle fails to dim its high beams, don't retaliate by flashing your own lights or engaging in any other dangerous behavior. Instead, take the necessary precautions to ensure your safety and that of others on the road.
To learn more about vehicles
https://brainly.com/question/24745369
#SPJ4
Five liens which is paid last? Mechanics, Second Mortgage, Real Estate Tax Lien, Special Assessment Lien
Of the Five liens the option that is paid last is Judgment lien
What is the Judgment lien?Property charges: Genuine Charge Lien. Extraordinary evaluation liens are liens made by the neighborhood government to pay for open advancements or administrations, such as modern sidewalks or sewage frameworks.
Mechanics or contractor's lien is one that is Usually a lien set on a property by a temporary worker or provider who has not been paid for work or materials. Judgment lien is often a lien set on a property by a court arrange due to an unpaid obligation or judgment.
Learn more about Judgment lien from
https://brainly.com/question/14408035
#SPJ1
the protection administrative law judges receive from liability for damages based on their decisions is called . question 59 options: novation amnesty immunity specificity adjudication
The protection administrative law judges receive from liability for damages based on their decisions is called "immunity". Immunity is the legal protection granted to judges from prosecution for acts that they undertake in the course of their judicial duties.
Judicial immunity is an essential element of an independent and impartial judiciary because it provides the security that is necessary to maintain the impartiality of the judge in the face of pressure from interested parties. Judicial immunity, often known as absolute immunity, protects judges from any civil or criminal liability resulting from their performance of judicial functions.
This immunity applies to any decision, action, or conduct undertaken by a judge in his or her official capacity as a judge. A judge cannot be held responsible for the outcomes of a trial or the judgments issued.
To know more about administrative law judges t refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29318336#
#SPJ11
Describe the kinds of intelligence that are collected.
Human intelligence (HUMINT), signals intelligence (SIGINT), imagery intelligence (IMINT), measurement and signatures intelligence (MASINT), and open source intelligence are among these disciplines (OSINT). Each of these disciplines is used to some extent by adversaries against the United States.
Human Intelligence (HUMINT) is the gathering of data from human sources. The collection can take place openly, such as when FBI agents interview witnesses or suspects, or it can take place clandestinely or covertly (espionage). The FBI is in charge of collecting HUMINT in the United States.
Data collection is an important step in the intelligence cycle because it involves gathering information.
To know more about Human intelligence here
https://brainly.com/question/28216008
#SPJ1
Is there a defense of crime we talked about in this chapter that you think should not be a valid defense?
Answer: yes. Over 50% of defendants' statements about the case are 1. not supported; 2. cannot be proved; 3. are provably wrong.
On top of it, the federal judge appointed to the case, introduced obvious procedural fraud into it - used the incorrect date the case was officially filed and thus timebarred important claims, on top of other violations of plaintiff's rights.
Explanation:
MegaGlobal is a company that wants to issue publicly traded securities. In the past three years, it has issued over $2 billion in securities, and $1 billion of those securities are in the hands of the public. This very large enterprise:
Answer:
MegaGlobal is a company that wants to issue publicly traded securities, based on all these facts about this company, that is it has issued a lot of money to the public. it is a very large enterprise which is considered to be a "well-known seasoned issuer" and this company is subject to a less restrictive registration proceedings compared to other companies.
Consequences for breaking alcohol selling laws include�
a) The server being found guilty of a crime
b) The server paying for damages caused by a person illegally served alcohol by them
c) The employer losing their license to sell alcohol
d) All of the above
what is 453745+847568364
Answer: 848,022,109
hope this helps
plz mark brainlesit
Answer:
848,022,118
Explanation:
hope this helps
in a motion for a judgment on the pleadings, either party simply asks the judge to reach a decision based on the information obtained during discovery.
In a motion for a judgment on the pleadings, either party simply asks the judge to reach a decision based on the information in the pleadings. This statement is TRUE.
A request for judgment on the pleadings is appropriately made in a federal civil action once all pleadings, including the complaint, answer, any counterclaims, cross-claims, and answers, have been filed. This kind of motion is made simply on the claims made by the parties in the pleadings, without taking any evidence into account.
A move for judgment on the pleadings asks the court to determine that there are no genuine factual disputes and to conclude the case by applying the law to these undisputed facts. When one party files a request for judgment on the pleadings, they argue that even if all of the facts asserted by the other party are true, the case should still be determined in their favor.
To know more about pleadings refer:
https://brainly.com/question/20814132
#SPJ4
Did the treaty become activated as soon as he signed it? Why or why not? Where is that addressed?
The treaty become activated as soon as he signed it. The Senate rejected the treaty for ratification, and the United States never joined the League of Nations. The Senate did approve for ratification of separate peace treaties with Germany, Austria, and Hungary.
A treaty is a formal and legally binding written agreement between parties to international law. It is usually created by or between sovereign states but can include international organizations, individuals, corporations, and other legal entities.
An example of a treaty that contains further binding treaty clauses is the Charter of the United Nations. By signing and ratifying the Charter, States have agreed to be legally bound by the resolutions passed by UN bodies such as the General Assembly and the Security Council. Treaties are binding agreements between states and become part of international law. Treaties to which the United States is a party also enforce federal law, which is part of what the Constitution calls "the supreme law of the land." "The Senate will not ratify the treaty.
Learn more about treaty here
https://brainly.com/question/12369010
#SPJ9
describe how nextera energy maintains professional organizational politics.
NextEra Energy is a well-established and recognized energy corporation that specializes in renewable energy generation. The organization has an international presence, with operations in more than 20 states in the US and many other countries.
One of the reasons for the organization’s success and growth over the years is its emphasis on maintaining professional organizational politics. Here’s how NextEra Energy maintains professional organizational politics:
1. Encourages diversity- Diversity is one of NextEra Energy's core values, and the organization encourages diversity in all aspects. The company believes that having a diverse team of employees with different backgrounds, cultures, and perspectives fosters innovation, problem-solving, and creativity. NextEra Energy creates an environment where employees feel comfortable to share their opinions, thoughts, and ideas.2. Employee engagement- NextEra Energy fosters employee engagement and maintains an open-door policy that enables employees to communicate freely with their supervisors and managers. The company encourages employees to ask questions, offer feedback, and share concerns. Employees at NextEra Energy feel valued, and their contributions are recognized and rewarded.
3. Transparency-NextEra Energy practices transparency in its decision-making process. The organization communicates its policies, strategies, and actions to its employees. The company also discloses information on its operations, financial performance, and sustainability reports, which builds trust and confidence among its employees.4. Ethical standards- NextEra Energy holds high ethical standards that guide its business practices. The company has a code of conduct that outlines its expectations for employees and suppliers. NextEra Energy adheres to local, state, and federal regulations, and it promotes responsible environmental stewardship.5. Continuous learning and development-NextEra Energy offers learning and development programs that enable employees to enhance their skills and knowledge. The company provides opportunities for employees to learn new skills and acquire new knowledge through training, workshops, and conferences.
The organization also offers career growth and development opportunities to its employees. In conclusion, NextEra Energy maintains professional organizational politics by encouraging diversity, employee engagement, transparency, ethical standards, and continuous learning and development. These practices create a culture of excellence, accountability, and trust, which ensures the company's continued success and growth.
To know more about NextEra Energy visit-
brainly.com/question/32631013
#SPJ11
Juvenile delinquency data suggests which of the following with respect to the impact of a “broken home” (divorce, separation, death) on juvenile delinquency rates:
Answer:
Juvenile delinquency data suggests that most troubled kids either where raised by a grandmother, aunt or other family members tend to act out on the account that they don't have a stable punishment system or they are mentally unstable. Often times troubled kids also do not do well in school, or on the contrary they are extremely intelligent.
Explanation:
empirical evidence suggests that judges’ instructions to jurors to disregard inadmissible evidence _____.
In conclusion, empirical evidence suggests that judges' instructions to jurors to disregard inadmissible evidence may be ineffective in preventing its influence on the decision-making process.
What does empirical evidence suggest about the effectiveness of judges' instructions to jurors to disregard inadmissible evidence?Empirical evidence suggests that judges' instructions to jurors to disregard inadmissible evidence may be ineffective in preventing its influence on the decision-making process.
Explanation:
Inadmissible evidence: In legal proceedings, certain types of evidence may be deemed inadmissible due to various reasons, such as relevance, reliability, or violation of legal procedures. Judges have the responsibility to exclude such evidence from the trial to ensure fairness and adherence to the rules of evidence.Instructions to disregard: When inadmissible evidence is mistakenly presented in court, judges typically issue instructions to jurors to disregard that evidence. The purpose of these instructions is to inform jurors that they should not consider the inadmissible evidence when reaching their verdict. Ineffectiveness of instructions: Empirical evidence suggests that jurors may struggle to completely disregard inadmissible evidence, despite being instructed to do so by the judge. Psychological research has shown that people may have difficulty ignoring information they have been exposed to, even if explicitly told to disregard it. This phenomenon is known as the "rebound effect" or "backfire effect."Influence on decision-making: Studies indicate that jurors often find it challenging to suppress the impact of inadmissible evidence on their decision-making process. The information may still subconsciously influence their perceptions, judgments, and ultimately, their verdicts. Even when jurors consciously try to disregard the evidence, its presence can still have unintended effects on their decision-making. Alternative strategies: Recognizing the limitations of instructions to disregard, legal professionals have explored alternative strategies to mitigate the influence of inadmissible evidence. These strategies may include pretrial rulings to exclude evidence, carefully structuring trials to minimize exposure to irrelevant information, or providing additional instructions to help jurors understand the legal significance of inadmissible evidence.This highlights the complexities of jury decision-making and the need for alternative strategies to ensure fair and unbiased trials.
Learn more about decision-making process
brainly.com/question/28900762
#SPJ11
Which of the following is true in regards to alcohol abuse?
A. It is the result of just one bad experience.
B. It happens by accident
C. It involves intentional overuse.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
i took it it should be right
It involves intentional overuse is true in regard to alcohol abuse. Hence, option C is correct.
What is alcohol abuse?Alcohol abuse can be both psychological and physical.It is primarily caused by excessive alcohol consumption on a regular basis, which becomes the person's habit of consuming alcohol on a regular basis and becoming abusive to the other person.
Secondary alcohols are produced when alcohols interact with other atoms. These secondary alcohols include methanol, isopropanol, and ethanol, the three forms of alcohol that people regularly consume.
drinking more frequently or for a longer period of time than expected. persistent desire to reduce or control drinking, or one or more failed attempts to accomplish so. Significant social, professional, or recreational activities curtailed or discontinued as a result of drinking.
Thus, option C, intentional overuse, is correct.
For more information about alcohol abuse, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2526379
#SPJ2
Please answer the following module discussion question:
Judy was a lab assistant for Michigan Jim Eyewear, where she was responsible for testing eye-glasses manufactured by the company. One of the tests required by the FDA was a drop-ball test that evaluated the resistance to breaking or shattering. Judy claims that this test was not conducted by the company, even though she and her co-workers were required to fill out a form for each pair of glasses confirming that the test had been conducted. Judy talked to David Baker, the President and owner of the company, and reassured her that he had ample insurance that would cover any potential liabilities. Judy reported the lack of testing to the FDA, but Baker had another employee testify to the FDA that the allegation was not true. Judy was discharged a few weeks later for an unrelated reason.
Discuss all legal issues and provide your point of view.
In any business, legal issues may arise from various sources such as the government, the public, or other companies. A legal issue refers to a problem or dispute that needs to be resolved through legal procedures.
The most common legal issues that a business may face include but are not limited to taxation, copyright infringement, employment laws, and environmental laws. As a business owner, it is essential to comply with all the applicable laws and regulations to avoid legal issues.
To achieve compliance, it is necessary for businesses to create a culture of compliance where every employee understands the importance of complying with the law.
In conclusion, businesses need to be proactive in identifying potential legal issues, have a compliance plan, and establish a culture of compliance. A business that operates ethically and in compliance with the law is more likely to succeed than one that does not.
To know more about legal issues, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/32670822#
#SPJ11
Which type of reaction is shown by this general equation?
Answer:
Learning Outcomes
Classify a reaction as combination, decomposition, single-replacement, double-replacement, or combustion.
Predict the products and balance a combustion reaction.
Many chemical reactions can be classified as one of five basic types. Having a thorough understanding of these types of reactions will be useful for predicting the products of an unknown reaction. The five basic types of chemical reactions are combination, decomposition, single-replacement, double-replacement, and combustion. Analyzing the reactants and products of a given reaction will allow you to place it into one of these categories. Some reactions will fit into more than one category.
Combination Reactions
A combination reaction, also known as a synthesis reaction, is a reaction in which two or more substances combine to form a single new substance. Combination reactions can also be called synthesis reactions .The general form of a combination reaction is: A+B→AB - (5.3.1)
One combination reaction is two elements combining to form a compound. Solid sodium metal reacts with chlorine gas to product solid sodium chloride.
2Na(s)+Cl2(g)→2NaCl(s)(5.3.2)
Notice that in order to write and balance the equation correctly, it is important to remember the seven elements that exist in nature as diatomic molecules ( H2 , N2 , O2 , F2 , Cl2 , Br2 , and I2 ).
One sort of combination reaction that occurs frequently is the reaction of an element with oxygen to form an oxide. Metals and nonmetals both react readily with oxygen under most conditions. Magnesium reacts rapidly and dramatically when ignited, combining with oxygen from the air to produce a fine powder of magnesium oxide.
2Mg(s)+O2(g)→2MgO(s)(5.3.3)
Decomposition Reactions
A decomposition reaction is a reaction in which a compound breaks down into two or more simpler substances. The general form of a decomposition reaction is:
AB→A+B(5.3.4)
Most decomposition reactions require an input of energy in the form of heat, light, or electricity.
Binary compounds are compounds composed of just two elements. The simplest kind of decomposition reaction is when a binary compound decomposes into its elements. Mercury (II) oxide, a red solid, decomposes when heated to produce mercury and oxygen gas.
2HgO(s)→2Hg(l)+O2(g)(5.3.5)
A reaction is also considered to be a decomposition reaction even when one or more of the products is still a compound. A metal carbonate decomposes into a metal oxide and carbon dioxide gas. For example, calcium carbonate decomposes into calcium oxide and carbon dioxide.
CaCO3(s)→CaO(s)+CO2(g)(5.3.6)
Metal hydroxides decompose on heating to yield metal oxides and water. Sodium hydroxide decomposes to produce sodium oxide and water.
Explanation:
Answer: Synthesis
Explanation: Reactants + energy —> products
Question 3 of 10
What is one of the major disadvantages of trade barriers?
A. Trade barriers force countries to become overly specialized.
B. Trade barriers make countries overly reliant on other countries.
C. Trade barriers reduce the variety of available consumer goods.
D. Trade barriers increase foreign competition for domestic
businesses.
The major disadvantages of trade barriers is that Trade barriers reduce the variety of available consumer goods.
What are the effects of trade barriers?The Impacts of trade barriers on business is very common and known. Trade barriers are known to be such as tariffs that are placed on food imports or subsidies for farmers in a form of developed economies.
This is said to have lead to a form of overproduction and also the dumping of goods on world markets. This tends to lower the world prices and it becomes a disadvantage to farmers in developing economies.
Learn more about Trade barriers from
https://brainly.com/question/1326741
Answer: Trade barriers reduce the variety of available consumer goods
Explanation:
Two equal forces act in opposite directions on object A. Two unequal forces act in opposite directions on object B. If these are the only forces acting on objects A and B.
example of institutional model
Answer:
I believe the answer would be every society have mainly five Social institutions such as family,government,religion,education, economics.
574 views
Explanation:
Which of the following is NOT a goal of the 2001 Convention on Cybercrime agreed to by the members of the Council of Europe in 2001?
providing mutual aid in support of each country’s investigations into computer and Internet crime
aligning the major elements of each country’s cybercrime laws
the immediate deportation of anyone suspected of committing a
cybercrime from the country of their capture to the country where the crime was committed
establishing fast and efficient methods of assuring mutual cooperation in the investigation of cybercrime
The immediate deportation of anyone suspected of committing a cybercrime from the country of their capture to the country where the crime was committed is not goal of 2001 Convention on Cybercrime.
What is cybercrime?Cybercrime refers to criminal activities that are carried out using digital technologies or the internet. It can take many forms, including hacking, phishing, identity theft, malware attacks, and online scams. Cybercriminals often target individuals, businesses, and governments to steal sensitive information, money, or other valuable assets. They may use various techniques to exploit vulnerabilities in computer systems or trick people into giving up their personal information. Cybercrime can have serious consequences, including financial losses, reputational damage, and even physical harm. It is a growing threat in today's increasingly digital world, and it is essential to take steps to protect yourself and your organization against cyber attacks.
To learn more about cybercrime, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23988092
#SPJ1
Explain factors taken into consideration to determine the similarity of a name for it to be called “undesirable” under section 24 of the Companies Act (Chapter 24:03
Answer:
Explain factors taken into consideration to determine the similarity of a name for it to be called “undesirable”
Explanation:
registered under the Securities Act [Chapter 24:25] or in respect of a ... “secretary” includes any official of a company, by whatever name called, who ... nothing in this Act shall affect the v alidity of the incorporation of any existing ... (b) he considers to be in conflict with the provisions of this section or undesirable for any other.
HURRY PLEASE You pay $38.76 for a phone case, a selfie-stick, and 2 USB drives. The phone case costs $14.29 and the selfie-stick costs $10.49. The USB drives cost the same amount. How much does each USB drive cost
Answer:
$0.78 i think
Explanation:
Answer:
12.235
Explanation:
BECAUSE
when presidents offer interpretations of new laws before those laws are implemented, they typically do so:
When presidents offer interpretations of new laws before those laws are implemented, they typically do so by providing their reasons and any background information they have.
In a bid to ensure clarity in their interpretation of the new laws, they aim to provide detailed explanations. In the United States, presidents are allowed to provide interpretations of new laws before they are implemented. They do so using signing statements. Signing statements are formal written declarations that accompany a bill signed into law. Most of the time, the president uses them to explain how they see the law or what the administration thinks about the issue is. Signing statements were mostly used by the US Supreme Court in the beginning. However, presidents have issued more signing statements than ever before in recent history. One such instance was President George W. Bush's issuance of more than 150 signing statements, which drew criticism from Congress and some legal scholars.
Learn more on laws here:
brainly.com/question/370944
#SPJ11
HURRY PLEASE
Question 1
protesting and refusing to serve in World War I was found to be unprotected speech by the Supreme Court. What reason would allow them to limit in individuals right to speak and protest?
A. clear and present danger
B. fighting words
C. Libel
D. Conflict with government interests
Explanation:
The answer is D. because Wilson declared it would restrict public criticism because it would undermine support for the war effort.
Answer:
A. clear and present danger
Explanation:
What reason would allow them to limit in individuals right to speak and protest = clear and present danger