Answer:
Tennessee
Explanation:
The first private prison to be publicly established occurred when the private company Corrections Corporation of America started managing a jail facility in Tennessee.
Applying the job characteristics Model, how motivating are Uber’s jobs for drivers?
Uber's jobs for drivers can be moderately motivating based on the Job Characteristics Model. Factors like skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, and feedback contribute to the overall motivation level, although individual experiences may vary.
Applying the Job Characteristics Model (JCM) to Uber's jobs for drivers, the motivation level can vary for different individuals. The JCM proposes that motivation is influenced by five core job characteristics: skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, and feedback. Uber's jobs for drivers generally exhibit some degree of skill variety as drivers perform various tasks like navigation and customer service. Task identity may be moderate, as drivers have a clear role in transporting passengers. Task significance can also be meaningful, as drivers contribute to the transportation needs of individuals. Autonomy is relatively high, as drivers have flexibility in choosing their working hours and locations. Feedback can vary depending on passenger ratings and reviews.Overall, Uber's jobs for drivers can provide a moderate level of motivation, with autonomy being a key factor. However, individual drivers' experiences and perceptions may influence the degree of motivation they derive from the job.
For more questions on Job Characteristics Model:
https://brainly.com/question/17228938
#SPJ8
WILL GIVE BRAINLYIST!
What Enlightenment ideal does this quote show? "That whenever any
Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of
the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government .
Declaration of Independence 1776
A.stare decusis
B. federalism
C. separation of powers
D. socal contract
Answer:
Its D. social contract
Explanation:
Just did the quiz and C was incorrect
One of the following is not a democratic right
The Right to Vote and to be elected
Freedom of thought, conscience and religion.
Freedom of Association
Right of Thought, Opinion and
Answer:
Right of thought Opinion I think
Answer:
Right of thought opinion
You are a parole officer who has a single mother with three hyperactive, attention deficit-disorder young children on your caseload. She receives no support from her ex-husband. Her mother wants nothing to do with her or the children because she believes “God is punishing” the young mother. She works as a topless dancer but hates it. She continues dancing because it pays the bills so well. You know she regularly smokes marijuana in an attempt to deal with stress. Obviously, this is a violation of probation. However, if you file a violation report on her, she will go back to prison. You know she is doing the best she can with her kids, is very involved with their school, and they are strongly bonded to her. You worry about what will happen to the kids.
1.What would you do?
Things to consider as you prepare
Ethical judgment: Defer filing a violation report while you work with her to find a better means to support herself and kids. Moral Rules: One should treat each person as an end and not as a means.
One should act in such a way that you will it to be a universal law.
One should do what is best for everyone.
One should do one’s duty.
Ethical system: A strict duty-based system might support filing a violation report, however, it depends on the definition of duty. It could be argued that a probation officer’s duty is not to automatically file violation reports, but rather to “protect society.” In this expanded view of duty, resolving the situation without filing a violation report might be
1. As the parole officer for a single mother with three hyperactive, attention-deficit disorder young children, I think that C. One should do what is best for everyone.
2. In the expanded view of duty, especially with respect to protecting society, resolving the situation of this woman without filing a violation report might be more ethical.
What is an ethical duty?An ethical duty is the responsibility to recognize, interpret, and act upon multiple principles and values based on given standards.
However, being ethical does not imply that ethical guidelines must be followed blindly. Some circumstances demand different approaches to achieve what is best for everyone involved.
Thus, ethical responsibility demands that the parole officer deals with each case with courage, fairness, and integrity.
Learn more about ethical principles at https://brainly.com/question/14334089 and https://brainly.com/question/18401975
#SPJ1
the agency most responsible for determining regulations used to make electronic appliances is the ____
A. department of energy
B. federal trade commission
C. consumer product safety commission
D. department of labor
Answer:
consumer product safety commission
Explanation:
i took the test
what is evidence based policing? what assumptions about police work have stientific studies of law enformecmetn called into question? what other assumptions made about police work today
Evidence-based policing refers to the use of scientific research and empirical evidence to inform and guide policing practices and policies.
Scientific studies of law enforcement have called into question several assumptions such as perspective of aggressive enforcement and tough-on-crime approaches are effective crime reduction approaches.
Other assumption about police work today is that police are primarily responsible for maintaining law and order.
Evidence-based policing is an approach to law enforcement that emphasizes the use of scientific research, empirical data, and analysis to inform and evaluate police practices, strategies, and decisions. This approach emphasizes the importance of collecting and analyzing data to identify effective strategies for reducing crime, improving public safety, and building community trust.
Scientific studies of law enforcement have called into question several assumptions about police work, including the belief that aggressive enforcement and tough-on-crime approaches are the most effective ways to reduce crime. Research has shown that community policing, problem-oriented policing, and other strategies that focus on building relationships with communities and addressing the underlying causes of crime are often more successful in reducing crime and improving community safety.
Another assumption made about police work today is that police are primarily responsible for maintaining law and order and that their primary role is to enforce criminal laws. However, evidence-based policing recognizes that police also have a broader role in maintaining public order and promoting public safety, including responding to emergencies, providing social services, and working collaboratively with community members and other agencies to address community concerns. By adopting evidence-based practices and policies, police agencies can enhance their effectiveness and build stronger relationships with the communities they serve.
Learn more about Evidence-based policing:
https://brainly.com/question/17544246
#SPJ11
Which of the following is not a requirement to receive the premium tax credit for health care?
a. Health care through the employer is not available
b.The taxpayer cannot be claimed as a dependent
c. Income must be no greater than 200 percent of the federal poverty line
d. Health insurance is purchased through the state or federal authorized insurance company
The taxpayer cannot be claimed as a dependent is not a requirement to receive the premium tax credit for health care.
Thus, the correct option is B.
What is health care?When someone receives health care, they may visit a patient or give them medication. The system by which people receive the necessary medical care is known as the healthcare sector.
The main goal of health care is to improve health in order to improve quality of life. To maintain their valuation and continue to operate, commercial enterprises concentrate on generating financial profit.
For health care to live up to its promise to society, it must prioritize generating social profit.
The four main types of healthcare systems and how they work to satisfy people's medical requirements. The Beveridge Model, Bismarck Model, National Health Insurance Model, and Out-of-Pocket Model are some of its names.
Learn more about health care, here
https://brainly.com/question/18985776
#SPJ1
Ms. Bosman writes that the verdict is being seen by some as “a win for the notion of self-defense” and others as “a failure of the criminal justice system.” Do you think this verdict should be seen as a symbol for broader issues? If so, which ones? If not, why?
The acquittal of Mr. Kyle Rittenhouse, who killed two men and wounded another in a riot against the killing of Jacob Blake, who was protesting the police brutality against George Floyd, can only be seen as a symbol of America's racial divide.
The question is, was Mr. Rittenhouse right to carry a gun at 17 years when he was attending to keep the peace and provide medical aid to protesters? At his age then, was Mr. Rittenhouse authorized to belong to a Vigilante Group that could keep the peace in racial protests?
Thus, given Mr. Rittenhouse's age and the purpose of his presence at the scene of rioting, the verdict that acquitted him is bound to attract controversy concerning broader issues of vigilantism, gun rights, and proper definition of self-defense.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/25716779
For each scenario, determine whether or not government intervention will improve society's well-being.
Government intervention will improve society's well-being. (1)
Government intervention will not improve society's well-being.(2)
For each scenario ,
(1). Local energy companies release pollutants into local reservoirs.
(2). Consumers are beginning to demand more smartphones than traditional mobile phones.
Government intervention has many advantages. For those who support government intervention in the economy, they define the following benefits. Provides consumers with more security when choosing products.
Governments effectively deprive workers of the fruits of their labor through taxes in order to subsidize others doing unproductive work, possibly at higher rates of return. Government programs are sometimes accused of disrupting the functioning of market economies.
To know more about society's well-being visit :
https://brainly.com/question/30301903
#SPJ4
case study on climate change and migration and its effects on indigenous populations in the south of mexico and central america
Climate change and migration have an impact on communities in the southern regions of Central America and Mexico, which can lead to changes in or extinctions of significant cultural animals as well as soil degradation, and floods.
Due to the climate issue, indigenous tribes are suffering from "ecological bereavement, loss of environment, and traditional knowledge."
According to the Health of Canadians in a Changing Climate, "the changing climate will exasperate the health and socioeconomic inequalities already encountered by First Nations, Inuit, as well as people, which include respiratory, cardio-vascular, water- and food-borne, chronic, and infectious diseases, in addition to financial strain as well as food insecurity.
Learn more about Climate Change at
https://brainly.com/question/28779953?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
True or false
1. Courts are only for people who break the law.
2. People have used laws since history began.
3. We had state courts before U.S. federal courts.
4. Less serious crimes are called bail.
5. Defendants are innocent until proven guilty in court.
6. If you receive a traffic summons, you must go to court
7. The courts are careful in choosing people to serve on a jury.
8. A judge cannot force people to testify against themselves
Answer:
1. False
2. True
3. True
4. False, they are called misdemeanors
5. True
6. True
7. True
8. True
Marie is going back-to-school shopping and plans to spend about $150 on new clothes. Which of the following would be the best way to make
sure she stays within her budget?
Select the best answer from the choices provided.
O A use her credit card
OB. withdraw $150 from an ATM
Oc use her debit card
OD. take $100 cash and use her credit card for the balance
Answer: A
Explanation:
Law is a practical discipline; theory has no place in law. With specific references to the Law of Contract, discuss. 700 words limit
The APA referencing style
Answer is given below
Explanation:
The contract is a branch of private law. It is concerned with private obligations arising in relation to natural and artificial people's symmetrical relations, rather than public obligations arising in relation to hierarchical relations between individuals and state. The contract is specific, at least in its traditional expression, to the obligations of the selected, or voluntary, obligations - that is, the obligations set out by the parties' intentions. This entry describes the doctrinal and theoretical accounts of contract law - with particular emphasis on the law of torture and antitrust law, contract law, and the relationship between two close neighbor. Law is a very interesting discipline and honestly speaking, law is a discipline that deals with other careers or disciplines or professions. Every work or work or profession has its own law. The law binds people and their every move or way of doing thing. Law is a practical discipline because all you have to do is apply it, whatever it is (the law) has a lot of applications. For example, using LAW OF CONTRACT as a specific reference must be done in accordance with the law, if anything happens in a contract.explain the meaning of section 377 of the penal code
Answer:
Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) is a colonial-era law that criminalized homosexuality and other forms of sexual activity between individuals of the same sex. The law, which was enacted in 1860, classified such behavior as "carnal intercourse against the order of nature" and punished it with imprisonment up to life.
The interpretation and application of Section 377 has been the subject of significant controversy and activism, with many people advocating for its repeal or revision in order to protect the rights and dignity of LGBTQ individuals in India. The law has been used to arrest, prosecute, and discriminate against people based on their sexual orientation, and has had a significant impact on the ability of LGBTQ people to openly express their identity and engage in intimate relationships.
In 2018, India's Supreme Court declared Section 377 unconstitutional, ruling that it violated the right to privacy and equality guaranteed by the Indian Constitution. This ruling was widely celebrated as a significant victory for LGBTQ rights in India, and has since been implemented nationwide.
Changes to the Constitution are called
А. articles
B. reviews
C. sections
D. amendments
Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi are in the ______ circuit. There are ______ circuits in the Circuit Courts of Appeals.
Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi are in the Fifth Circuit. There are thirteen circuits in the Circuit Courts of Appeals.
The Circuit Court of Appeals is the intermediate appellate court in the US Federal Court system, which hears appeals from the Federal district courts as well as other Federal courts and agencies. This court is divided into thirteen different circuits, each of which is responsible for a specific geographical region or territory within the United States.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals is one of the thirteen Circuit Courts of Appeals in the United States. It is composed of Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. The circuit covers an area of 153,923 square miles, including 20 million people, 26 US district courts, and 5,479 active judges.
The thirteen circuits are geographically based. Each circuit has a number of district courts within its borders. The courts of appeal, as part of the Federal judicial system, are responsible for handling appeals from district courts. Appeals from the decisions of the Court of Appeals go directly to the Supreme Court. Hence, the Circuit Courts of Appeals are one step away from the Supreme Court of the United States.
In summary, the Fifth Circuit contains Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi while there are thirteen circuits in the Circuit Courts of Appeals.
Learn more about the Circuit Courts of Appeals: https://brainly.com/question/15150747
#SPJ11
An administrative hearing can determine conditions of confinement, including
O amount of food rations given
O attending recreation alone.
O hand and leg restraints when out the cell
O number of escorting officers
(Select all that apply)
Answer:
An administrative hearing can determine the following conditions of confinement:
- Hand and leg restraints when out of the cell
- Number of escorting officers.
It cannot determine the amount of food rations given or whether an inmate can attend recreation alone.
Which choices accurately identify portions of the great compromise ratified at the constitutional convention?.
Options B, C & D are the correct options.
State legislatures would elect the Senate with the equal representation. The House of Representatives would introduce all bills that would start new taxes or expenditures. Proportional representation would be used to elect members of House of Representatives.
About Great compromise
The Great Compromise made the US Congress a bicameral, or the two-house, entity that makes the laws. Each state would be given two senatorial representatives, and in the house of reps, no. of the representatives each state might have would depend on its population.
Question: Which choices accurately identify portions of the Great Compromise ratified at the Constitutional Convention?
A) Congress would be in the form of a unicameral structure.
B) The Senate would be chosen by state legislatures using equal
representation
C) All bills initiating taxes or spending would begin in the House of
Representatives
D) The House of Representatives would be elected by the people using
proportional representation.
To know more about the Great Compromise:
brainly.com/question/6839536
#SPJ4
When a commercial real estate sale has two Agent sales associates the broker may create a?
When a commercial real estate sale involves two agent sales associates working under a broker, the broker may create a co-brokerage agreement or a dual agency arrangement.
A co-brokerage agreement is a contractual agreement between two real estate brokers, each representing different parties involved in a transaction. In this case, the broker representing the seller and the broker representing the buyer collaborate to facilitate the sale. The agreement outlines the responsibilities, duties, and compensation arrangement between the two brokers.
Under a co-brokerage agreement, the brokers typically share information, work together to market the property, coordinate showings, negotiate terms, and assist in the closing process. The agreement specifies how the commission will be divided between the brokers, typically based on a predetermined percentage or a negotiated split.
On the other hand, a dual agency arrangement occurs when the broker represents both the buyer and the seller in a transaction. In this scenario, the broker acts as a neutral intermediary, facilitating the transaction while maintaining impartiality.
know more about intermediary here:
https://brainly.com/question/29732040
#SPJ8
1. Investigators acting as police witnesses in a case should be prepared to encounter a certain amount of theatrics during the trial. They should cultivate a O courtroom drama, courtroom demeanor. courtroom practice. courtroom credibility.
Answer:
Investigators acting as police witnesses in a case should be prepared to encounter a certain amount of theatrics during the trial. They should cultivate a courtroom demeanor.
Explanation:
Courtroom demeanor refers to one's professionalism within a court of law. Your courtroom demeanor is an extremely crucial factor to how exactly your witness testimony is perceived by the jury or bench.
implied powers are outlined in article iii of the constitution. implied powers are outlined in article iii of the constitution. true false
The statement 'Implied powers are outlined in Article III of the Constitution' is false as expressed powers are stated in the Article III but implied powers are not.
The powers that are not explicitly stated in the Constitution, but are essential for the effective functioning of the government, are referred to as implied powers. The powers which are derived from the constitution’s necessary and proper clause are known as the implied powers.
The United States Constitution only grants certain powers to the government. The Constitution's Article I, Section 8 lists the powers of Congress. Implied powers come from the Constitution's Necessary and Proper Clause, which grants Congress the power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers.
A good example of implied powers can be seen in the federal government's ability to create a national bank. A national bank is not explicitly stated as a power of the federal government in the Constitution. However, by creating a national bank, the federal government can carry out its other enumerated powers like collecting taxes, borrowing money, and regulating commerce. This is possible because the Necessary and Proper Clause gives Congress the implied power to create a national bank.
Learn more about Implied powers:
https://brainly.com/question/11346328
#SPJ11
What law taxed all legal documents, permits, contracts, newspapers, and playing cards?.
The stamp act was the law taxed all legal documents, permits, contracts, newspapers, and playing cards.
About the stamp act
Any law that mandates the payment of a tax on the transferring of specific papers is referred to as a stamp act. All who pay the taxes get their papers legally stamped, which makes them official documents. Stamp acts have historically applied to a wide range of things, including playing cards, dice, prescription medications, checks, mortgages, contracts, marriage licences, and newspapers. After paying the duty, the objects are frequently physically stamped at authorised government offices, however more practical and usual procedures involve paying a fixed amount annually or purchasing adhesive stamps.
To know more about the stamp act:
brainly.com/question/19013647
#SPJ4
You are free to agree with a competitor to A. determine what freight charge both companies will charge. B. agree not to bid on a contract. C. allocate sales among the customers. D. None of the above answers are correct because they are all violations of antitrust laws.
Option (D) is the right answer. None of the answers above are correct since they all violate antitrust regulations.
In general, antitrust laws enjoin unlawful combinations and marketable practices, leaving it up to courts to determine which bones are illegal grounded on the data of each case. From the days of steed and perambulator to the contemporary digital age, courts have applied antitrust laws to evolving commerce.
Yet, for over a century, antitrust laws have had the same introductory thing to defend the process of competition for the benefit of consumers, icing that businesses have strong impulses to serve efficiently, keep prices low, and quality high.
The Sherman Act makes illegal" every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade," as well as any" monopolization, tried monopolization, or conspiracy or combination to sew up."
To know more about anti-trust laws:
https://brainly.com/question/20392499
#SPJ4
which of the following is a true statement about the u.s. court of appeals? group of answer choices each of the judicial circuits has only one court of appeals. all of the above are true. most review done by the court of appeals is by certiorari. review by the court of appeals is often done with the help of a jury, but a timely request must be made or else a jury trial will be waived.
The following is a true assertion about the u.s. court of appeals that each of the judicial circuits has only one court of appeals. option (A) is correct.
The U.S. Courts of Requests hear requests from lower courts of both common and criminal preliminaries yet don't explore the current realities of a case. Rather, the Requests Courts research whether the law has been reasonably and accurately applied by the lower courts.
Since the courts of requests have just redrafted the locale, they don't hold preliminaries. Just courts with unique purviews hold preliminaries and accordingly decide disciplines (in criminal cases) and cures (in common cases). Therefore, option (A) is correct.
Learn more about u.s. court:
https://brainly.com/question/15752747
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
which of the following is a true statement about the u.s. court of appeals? group of answer choices
(A) each of the judicial circuits has only one court of appeals.
(B) all of the above are true. most review done by the court of appeals is by certiorari.
(C) review by the court of appeals is often done with the help of a jury, but a timely request must be made or else a jury trial will be waived.
governance is a system of rules, policies, and practices that dictate how – a. Company’s Board of directors manage b. oversee the operations c. oversee the operations d. All of the above
The governance of a structure can be regarded as a system of rules, policies, and also certain practical activities that tend to dictate the management and overseeing of operations done by a company's Board of Directors. Therefore, the option D holds true.
The Board of Directors can be referred to or considered as the most important key managerial personnel within an organization. They take the crucial decisions of the organization, which are always in the orientation of the process that ensures achievement of the organizational goals.
Learn more about the Board of Directors here:
https://brainly.com/question/14898210
#SPJ4
Which method of judicial selection might require confirmation by the state legislature or an executive counsel?
Answer:
Gubernatorial appointment.
Explanation:
With the method of gubernatorial appointment, a state governor will appoint a judge to a particular court, and confirmation by either an executive counsel or state legislation will follow.
Vehicle A was parked alongside the right curb just behind vehicle B. The driver of vehicle A
came out of the dry cleaner’s and hung the dry-cleaned clothes over the left rear window. The
driver entered vehicle A and checked for traffic in the rearview mirror. Seeing none, the driver
began to move the vehicle away from the curb and into the traffic lane. Vehicle C, traveling in
the same direction and coming from behind vehicle A, crashed into the driver’s side of vehicle
A. The impact pushed vehicle A into the left side of vehicle B.
How could the collision have been avoided?
Answer:
By not hanging clothes over the left rear mirror. This maneuver blocked the blind spot of vehicle A. Given that they are parallel parked in an area of commerce, however, one could also argue vehicle C should have been paying more attention as well. Had Vehicle C reacted to the movement of Vehicle A in a swifter manner, there would also have been no collision. This, combined with lower residential speed limits implies C was distracted driving.
Jurisdiction over a defendant is referred to as subject matter jurisdiction. True or False
It is False that Jurisdiction over a defendant is not referred to as subject matter jurisdiction. Subject matter jurisdiction is the authority that a court has to hear a particular type of case based on the subject matter of the case.
Jurisdiction over a defendant, on the other hand, is referred to as personal jurisdiction or territorial jurisdiction.Personal jurisdiction is the court’s power over the defendant, which is acquired by providing the defendant with notice of the proceedings and affording the defendant an opportunity to be heard. Personal jurisdiction may be obtained in a number of ways, including through the defendant’s presence in the state, through the defendant’s consent to jurisdiction, or through the defendant’s contacts with the state.Territorial jurisdiction refers to the court’s authority to hear cases that arise within a particular geographic area, such as a state or county. Territorial jurisdiction is established by statute or constitution and is based on the geographic location of the events that gave rise to the case.In conclusion, subject matter jurisdiction and personal or territorial jurisdiction are different types of jurisdiction that are important for courts to have in order to hear and decide cases.
to know about Jurisdiction visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
HURRY PLEEASEE Click this link to view O*NET’s Tasks section for Lawyers. Note that common tasks are listed toward the top, and less common tasks are listed toward the bottom. According to O*NET, what are some common tasks performed by Lawyers? Check all that apply.
According to O*NET, some common tasks performed by Lawyers are:
electing jurors, arguing motions, meeting with judges, and questioning witnessesinterpreting laws, rulings, and regulations for individuals and businessesrepresenting clients in court or before government agenciespresenting evidenceWhat are general tasks performed by Lawyers?In legal matters and disputes, a lawyer advises and represents businesses, individuals, and government agencies. The primary responsibilities of a lawyer are to uphold the law while protecting the rights of their clients.
Lawyers provide legal advice, conduct research, and gather evidence or information, draft legal documents such as contracts, divorce decrees, or real estate transactions, and defend or prosecute in court. Lawyers can practice in a variety of areas, including corporate, family, bankruptcy, and environmental law.
Read more about Lawyers
brainly.com/question/20397360
#SPJ1
Which approach to framing an argument involves appeals to your knowledge, experience, and reliability?
A) Ethos and credibility
B) Pre-emptive arguments
C) Assertion
D) Appeal to authority and precedent
Answer:
A) Ethos and credibility
Explanation:
Just wanted to correct the comment on the other answer; I chose B and it was incorrect. Here's the answer explanation from the test:
"Whenever an argument is framed with appeals to what the author knows already or their ability to gain sources, it appeals to ethos and credibility."