The exclusionary rule states that Group of answer choices federal law cannot be applied in state courts. the laws of one state court cannot be applied in the courts of another state. evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. state law cannot be applied in federal courts. none of the above.
Answers
The exclusionary rule states that evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. Therefore option (C) is the correct answer.
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. This rule prevents police officers from using evidence that they have collected in violation of an individual's constitutional rights. Therefore, if the court finds that evidence was obtained through illegal means, it will not be allowed to be used during a trial.The exclusionary rule does not prohibit the use of illegally obtained evidence in all circumstances. The rule only applies if the evidence was obtained in a manner that violates a person's constitutional rights.
The exclusionary rule states that evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. This means that if the evidence is collected in violation of a person's constitutional rights, it cannot be used in court against that individual. In summary, the correct option for the question is: Evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. Option (C) is correct answer.
Learn more about exclusionary rule https://brainly.com/question/12239906
#SPJ11
Related Questions
When may a minor legally purchase
alcohol?
They are assisting a police officer in the
enforcement of the alcoholic beverage code.
They are in the visible presence of their legal
friends.
They are assisting an adult.
They are diners in a restaurant.
Save
Answers
Answer: 21.
Explanation:
The legal age for that is 21, the act being passed 1984.
Answer:
They are assisting a police officer. A minor may only legally purhase alcohol under certain standings, most likely with a court order or will a law enforcement officer.
Explanation:
Which codes and standards group is a private, nonprofit organization that identifies public requirements for national safety, engineering, and industrial standards?
Answers
Answer:
"American National Standards Institute (ANSI)" would be the correct answer.
Explanation:
ANSI is an independent, non-profit organization that promotes voluntary goods, procedures, programs, structures, and employment practices and conformity evaluation systems. The work of ANSI had already provided a fair and constructive way for every stakeholder to take part in the development of standards.
After a jury is selected, the attorneys present their theories of the case and what they hope to prove to the jury in _______.
Answers
Write 600-800 words on one of the following topic It will be graded according to presentation and use of language, content and organization, analysis and argument, and depth of knowledge. Your essay has to reflect discussions in the class. Please consult the rubric for details.
1- Who Makes American Foreign policy? How to explain the current distribution of foreign policy-making power between Congress and the Presidency? Does public opinion matter in the making of US foreign policy?
Answers
The United States of America is known worldwide for its global influence and reach, its ability to affect the global environment through its foreign policy and its global power.
America's foreign policy is the basic guide to its relations with other nations. It aims to protect the country's interests abroad while promoting democratic values at home and abroad. The current distribution of foreign policy-making power between Congress and the Presidency reflects a balance of power between these two branches of the government. The President holds primary authority for conducting foreign relations with other countries and developing foreign policy. However, the Congress has a vital role in making foreign policy decisions and carrying out policies as well. Moreover, public opinion has a significant impact on the making of US foreign policy.In America, the Constitution empowers both the President and Congress with certain powers related to foreign affairs. The President has the power to make treaties with foreign nations, and Congress has the power to approve these treaties. The President also has the power to appoint ambassadors, and Congress must approve these appointments. In addition, the President has the authority to negotiate with foreign governments on trade, military issues, and other matters. Congress has the power to approve or reject the budget for foreign aid, and they also have the ability to investigate foreign policy decisions made by the President.Congress also has an essential role in foreign policy-making, particularly in the areas of defense spending and war-making. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, and they also have the power to fund military operations. Congress can also hold hearings and investigate foreign policy decisions made by the President. Additionally, Congress can pass laws that limit the President's authority in foreign policy-making.In conclusion, the current distribution of foreign policy-making power between Congress and the Presidency reflects a balance of power between these two branches of the government. The President has the primary authority for conducting foreign relations with other countries and developing foreign policy, but Congress has a critical role in making foreign policy decisions and carrying out policies. Public opinion also plays an essential role in the making of US foreign policy. It influences the government's decision-making process and can impact foreign policy outcomes. Therefore, it is essential for the government to consider public opinion when making foreign policy decisions.
To Know More about essential visit:
brainly.com/question/3248441
#SPJ11
Suppose a politician is critical of a government pollution permit policy that they say allows companies to buy and sell the right to pollute. They argue that the public’s right to breathe clean air and the health of the planet require real regulation instead of this type of government policy
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Firstly, the politician's emphasis on the public's right to breathe clean air highlights the fundamental importance of environmental protection. Clean air is essential for human health and well-being, and it is the government's responsibility to ensure that the air quality meets acceptable standards. By allowing companies to trade pollution permits, there is a risk that certain areas or communities may suffer disproportionately from pollution, especially if those areas are economically disadvantaged or lack political influence. This approach raises questions about environmental justice and the equitable distribution of pollution burdens.
Moreover, the politician's concern for the health of the planet reflects an understanding of the global impact of pollution. Pollution does not respect national boundaries, and its effects can extend far beyond the immediate vicinity of the emitting source. Climate change, in particular, is a pressing global issue that demands collective action. While a market-based approach might incentivize emissions reductions, it may not be sufficient to address the urgency and magnitude of the environmental challenges we face. Comprehensive and enforceable regulations are necessary to ensure that environmental goals are met effectively.
The argument against the government's pollution permit policy highlights the limitations of relying solely on market mechanisms to address environmental problems. Critics of such policies argue that they create a system where companies can simply pay for the right to pollute, effectively commodifying pollution and externalizing the costs onto society. They contend that true regulation, which sets clear standards and enforces compliance, is needed to protect the environment and safeguard public health.
However, it is worth noting that pollution permit systems, such as cap-and-trade programs, can have their advantages. When properly designed and implemented, they can provide flexibility, incentivize emissions reductions, and allow for cost-effective pollution control. By putting a price on pollution, they create economic incentives for companies to adopt cleaner technologies and practices.
Ultimately, finding the right balance between market mechanisms and regulatory approaches is crucial. A comprehensive approach to environmental protection may involve a combination of market-based solutions, such as pollution trading schemes, along with robust regulations and enforcement mechanisms. This would allow for both economic efficiency and environmental effectiveness, ensuring that the public's right to clean air and a healthy planet are adequately protected.
Which of the following refers to the study of motion, angles, and behavior of projectile objects?
O A. serology
OB.
forensics
O C.
ballistics
OD.
trace evidence
O E.
blood spatter
Answers
Answer:. B. forensics
Answer:
C. ballistics
Explanation:
the science of dynamics that deals with the flight, behavior and effects of projectiles, especially bullets, unguided bombs, rockets, or the like; the science or art of designing and accelerating projectiles so as to achieve a desired performance.
A defendant filed a complaint against a third-party defendant for contribution permitted under federal law for any environmental damages for which the defendant may be found liable. The third-party defendant and the defendant were domiciled in the same state. The third-party defendant filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The third-party defendant also submitted affidavits in support of its position, but the court refused to consider them. After taking all well-pleaded facts in the defendant's complaint as true and resolving all doubts and inferences in the defendant's favor, the court denied the motion to dismiss.
Required:
Has the court acted properly in making its ruling?
a. No, because the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the complaint against the third-party defendant.
b. No, because the court failed to consider the third-party defendant's affidavits.
c. Yes, because the court took all well-pleaded facts in the complaint as true and resolved all doubts and inferences in the defendant's favor.
d. Yes, because a third-party defendant cannot file a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Answers
The correct option is (c); Yes, because the court took all well-pleaded facts in the complaint as true and resolved all doubts and inferences in the defendant's favor.
What is third-part defendant?A third-party defendant is a person or entity that the primary defendant sues and adds to the case under the theory that they are accountable to the defendant for all or part of the plaintiff's claim.
For the given case:
The court must accept as true all of the well-pleaded facts in the complaint and resolve any questions and inferences in the complainant's favor before deciding whether to grant a motion to dismiss for failure to establish a claim on which relief can be granted. The complainant in this case is the defendant.Answer option A is erroneous because the third-party defendant's move was a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief can be given, not a petition to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Furthermore, not withstanding the lack of diversity of citizenship, the court has subject-matter jurisdiction over the defendant's contribution complaint since it is based on federal law, even though it may raise the question of lack of subject-matter jurisdiction on its own.B is the incorrect response option. The court may only take into account the claims in the complaint, any exhibits attached to the complaint, and any matters susceptible to judicial notice when deciding whether to grant a motion to dismiss for failure to establish a claim on which relief can be granted. (Remember that for a request for summary judgment, the court could take into account outside information like an affidavit.)Because any party against whom a claim is made may file a motion to dismiss for failure to articulate a claim upon which relief can be given, answer choice D is wrong.To know more about jurisdiction and its types, here
https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
discuss the significance of environmental sustainability in biodiversity survival
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Beyond its intrinsic value, biodiversity is necessary to human survival. Ecosystem diversity is crucial to ecosystem integrity, which in turn enables our life support, giving us a livable climate, breathable air, and drinkable water.
a citizen of florida, wants to obtain a business license in georgia. the georgia state legislature enacts a law that imposes a $2,000 license fee on nonresidents. georgia residents pay $0. this most likely violates question 12 options: the commerce clause. no provision in the u.s. constitution. the privileges and immunities clause. the full faith and credit clause.
Answers
The most likely provision of the U.S. Constitution that the Georgia law violates in this scenario is the Privileges and Immunities Clause.
The Privileges and Immunities Clause is found in Article IV, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and prohibits states from discriminating against citizens of other states by treating them unfavorably in comparison to their own citizens.
By imposing a significantly higher license fee on nonresidents compared to residents, Georgia is potentially infringing upon the rights of Florida citizens to engage in business activities on equal terms with Georgia residents. This kind of discriminatory treatment based on residency is likely to be deemed unconstitutional under the Privileges and Immunities Clause.
Learn more about Immunities
https://brainly.com/question/32453970
#SPJ11
The president calls on congress to pass proposed healthcare legislation - in which role is the president acting in?
Chief of Party
Chief of State
Chief Legislator
Answers
Answer:
Chief Legislator
Explanation:
If the defense claims that your testimony does not agree with that of other officers, you should amend your testimony to eliminate possible jury perceptions of a disorganized and ineffective police department.
Answers
If the defense claims that your testimony does not align with that of other officers, it is not advisable to amend your testimony solely to eliminate potential jury perceptions of a disorganized and ineffective police department.
As a witness, your primary duty is to provide truthful and accurate testimony based on your personal knowledge and observations. Tampering with or altering your testimony to artificially align with other officers' statements can compromise the integrity of the legal process and undermine the pursuit of justice.
While it is essential for law enforcement agencies to maintain consistency and credibility in their investigations and testimonies, it should not come at the expense of truthfulness. It is the responsibility of the defense and prosecution to present their respective cases, and the jury's task is to evaluate the evidence and testimonies provided.
If your testimony differs from that of other officers due to genuine differences in observations or recollections, it is important to explain those differences honestly and provide any relevant context or reasoning.
It is up to the jury to weigh the credibility and reliability of witnesses and their testimonies when reaching a verdict. Attempting to amend your testimony solely for the purpose of presenting a unified front can be seen as unethical and may have serious legal consequences.
Learn more about testimony here :
https://brainly.com/question/32360114
#SPJ11
At least 200 words per question. Just start me off with 100 words and ill finish the rest! THANKS GUYS!!
1. What common problems have existed throughout the centuries for people in law enforcement?
2. Why was there no law enforcement during the daytime for many centuries?
3. What are some of the challenges law enforcement will face with intelligence-led policing as it emerges in the new era of policing?
Answers
Answer:
uhhhhh how am i supposed to know this??? u can look it up on the internet lol
why was the city such a central element in progressive america
Answers
The city was a central element in Progressive America because it was seen as a place where the problems and challenges of modern society were most visible and most acute. Urbanization and industrialization had led to rapid population growth, economic change, and social dislocation.
Progressive reformers saw the city as a site of opportunity and experimentation, where they could apply their ideas and values to improve the lives of urban residents.
In addition, cities were also centers of political power and activism. As more people moved to urban areas, they gained greater influence over politics and government. This led to the emergence of new political movements and interest groups, such as labor unions and social reform organizations, which sought to influence public policy and advocate for the rights and interests of urban residents.
Furthermore, the city was also a place of cultural and intellectual ferment, with new ideas and values emerging in the areas of art, literature, and social thought. The city was a place where new ideas and social norms were being developed, and it served as a catalyst for the larger social and cultural changes taking place in American society at the time.
To know more about Progressive reform refer to-
brainly.com/question/17106136#
#SPJ11
what is the relation between fundamental rights and directive principles of state policy of Indian constitution..?
Answers
Answer:
Board of Governors
The Board of Governors--located in Washington, D.C.--is the governing body of the Federal Reserve System. It is run by seven members, or "governors," who are nominated by the President of the United States and confirmed in their positions by the U.S. Senate.
Explanation:
so the answer part has the Explanation:
Artist marvin gaye wrote a song entitled gotta give it up. This song is an example of _____________ property.
Answers
A _________ is a legal agreement between two or more people and is the least common form of business.
Answers
A partnership is a legal agreement between two or more people and is the least common form of business.
A formal agreement between two or more parties to run a business and split the profits is called a partnership.
Partnership arrangements come in many different forms. One type of business where partners may have minimal liability is a partnership where all participants share profits and liabilities equally. Additionally, there is the so-called "silent partner," when one party does not participate in the day-to-day management of the company.
An agreement between two or more people to manage a business' operations and divide its assets and liabilities is known as a partnership.
All partners in a general partnership corporation split the company's assets and debts equally.
Lawyers and other professionals frequently create limited liability partnerships.
Comparing a partnership to a corporation, there may be tax advantages.
To learn more about partnership- https://brainly.com/question/17083513
g a judge must be present during depositions to resolve disputes and ensure fairness. group startstrue or false
Answers
False. During depositions, a judge is not need to be present. Depositions are often made in a less formal environment, outside of the courtroom, where a judge is not needed to be present.
What are depositions?A witness or a party to a case may be formally interviewed during a deposition, which is conducted under oath in front of a court reporter or videographer. They are used to acquire data and proof during the discovery phase of a case. When a witness cannot testify in person, depositions are used to gather testimony that may be utilised in court.
They can also be used to clarify the evidence of a witness who will be testifying in person. Depositions can be recorded online or in person and are often conducted in a less formal environment outside of the courtroom. They are carried out by attorneys and can be used to establish facts, elucidate evidence, and cast doubt on a witness.
To know more about Depositions visit
brainly.com/question/18273856
#SPJ4
f enough investors decide to purchase stocks, they are likely to drive up stock prices, thereby causing __________ and __________.
Answers
If enough investors decide to purchase stocks, they are likely to drive up stock prices, thereby causing demand to exceed supply and prices to rise.
This can create a positive feedback loop where the increasing prices attract more investors, leading to further price increases.
This phenomenon is known as a bull market. However, if this trend continues for an extended period, it can lead to overvalued stocks and a potential market correction, which is a significant drop in stock prices.
In a bull market, there is an overall positive sentiment about the economy and the stock market, which leads to increased demand for stocks and other securities.
To know more about stocks here:
https://brainly.com/question/29750557
#SPJ4
Mr. Hudson, isn't it true that you first meet June
Harris on April 14, 1981, is an example of what
kind of question?
Answers
Imagine you are the probation officer asked to develop presentence investigation reports (PSIS) for Ms. Livingston,
Louis Livingston, and Monika (the private detective).
Answers
The major aim of the presentence investigation reports (PSIS) that you, the probation officer, are asked to create for Ms. Livingston, Louis Livingston, and Monika (the private investigator), is to assist the court in selecting an appropriate punishment.
The most crucial document in the federal criminal procedure has been referred to as the presentence investigation report. Although its major objective is to aid the court in choosing the proper sentencing, it continues to be crucial in making decisions even after a conviction.
Probation officers from the United States fill out these reports. In almost every case, a probation officer is required by Rule 32 of The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to conduct a presentence investigation report for the court.
Read more about private detective at
https://brainly.com/question/9669547
#SPJ4
4. A branch manager of WR has received a request from a corporate customer, Acme Pty Ltd, which wishes to increase its overdraft. The bank is prepared to do so provided the company provides appropriate security in view of the fact that the current overdraft has exceeded its limit. Acme’s directors, John and Wisteria, suggest that Wisteria’s parents might be prepared to mortgage their home to the bank.
Required:
The manager seeks your legal advice about the pitfalls of accepting security from such people, and what precautions the bank would need to take if it decided to do so. ( See Amadio’s case).
Answers
The advice that should be provided to the bank manager about the pitfalls of accepting security from Wisteria's parents, including the necessary precautions the bank should take, include:
The bank should ensure that it provides adequate explanations to Wisteria's parents about the nature of the overdraft and the financial state of Acme Pty Ltd.The bank should further explain the limitations of the guarantee involved with respect to the mortgage of the home.The bank should discover if Wisteria's parents' home is under another mortgage.The bank should take precautions that it does not fall into the pits that the classical case of Commercial Bank of Australia v. Amadio by not indulging itself in unconscionable conduct with the parents of Wisteria.What is unconscionable conduct?Unconscionable conduct is harsh conduct that goes against good conscience.
Unconscionable conduct is usually described as oppressive without considering its unfairness.
Thus, in seeking Wisteria's parents to mortgage their home to the bank, the bank manager should be careful not to mingle its business dealings with persons who lack the capacity to enter into a valid guarantee for Acme Pty Ltd.
Learn more about unconscionable conduct at https://brainly.com/question/13720902
Which of the following is a false statement about the role of defense attorneys in juvenile court proceedings?
a. the Progressives
b. proceedings that are open to the public
c. Defense attorneys play a key role in most juvenile court matters.
d. The PO becomes involved only after the juvenile has entered a "plea" and has been adjudicated delinquent
Answers
The false statement about the role of defense attorneys in juvenile court proceedings is d. The PO (probation officer) becomes involved only after the juvenile has entered a "plea" and has been adjudicated delinquent.
They help ensure that the juvenile's rights are protected and that the court proceedings are fair. Defense attorneys work closely with their clients to understand the facts of the case and to build a defense strategy. They also negotiate with prosecutors to reach a plea agreement, if appropriate, and advocate for their clients during sentencing.
In contrast, probation officers typically become involved in juvenile court proceedings after a finding of delinquency has been made. Their role is to supervise and provide services to juveniles who have been adjudicated delinquent and placed on probation.
Probation officers monitor the progress of the juvenile's rehabilitation, help them access necessary services, and report on their compliance with the terms of their probation.
To learn more about probation, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/3344075
#SPJ11
how science prevail over common sense?
Answers
Answer:
The difference between common sense and science. Plainly stated common sense is information gathered from everyday knowledge and science is thorough research on a particular subject with concluded facts.
The reason for science prevailing over common sense is because its uses conceptual schemes and theoretical structures while common sense has no structure to it,
Basically, a common sense means a conventional intelligence that people gathered from everyday situations, events etc.
Science mean a knowledge about our world based on facts learned through numerous experiments, observation etc.
In conclusion, the reason for science prevailing over common sense is because its uses conceptual schemes and theoretical structures while common sense has no structure to it.
Read more about Science
brainly.com/question/17216882
At the heart of the police subculture is the obligation of support and loyalty to other police officers.
True
False
Answers
Answer:
The answer is True!
Explanation:
Because, A police officer have to gain trust! just like everyday people.
Answer:
True
"Once accepted into the ranks of the police, an individual is introduced to the police subculture, which is a set of norms and values governing police behavior. One of the reasons why this subculture exists is due to the danger, stress, and isolation that are common in police work. Recruits learn these values and norms starting in the training that they receive at police academies. They learn not only the formal rules about policing but also the informal ones that are expected by others in this subculture. At the heart of the police subculture is the obligation of support and loyalty to other police officers. Other aspects that also play a role are group solidarity, honor, and respect for police authority."
Law is a practical discipline discipline ;theory has no place in law. With specific references to the law of contract discuss
Answers
ANSWER:
Law is a practical discipline because it is a discipline that guilds ones action, and define the rules one have to observe in taking an action
Contract law is the law that binds an agreement between two parties with a mutual intension. This law enforces what each party have to offer to the other, and what the penalty will be if one should offend the agreement.
These law can be use to describe law to be practical because the agreement which the law enforces, are their actions toward each other. These actions are described as the conducts which is abide by the contract enforced by the law.
Example; Mr Obi and Mr Michael signed an agreement to exchange their smart phone with each other. But also agreed that anyone who's smart phone is faulty when exchanged, will pay a fine and return back the phone he collected.
The law that enforces this agreement in the example above is called a contract law. This is a practical example of law, because it is law that abides their actions in the exchange of phone and passing out penalty.
in successful market share liability cases, who is made to pay the damages incurred by the plaintiff?
Answers
In successful market share liability cases, each defendant is made to pay the damages incurred by the plaintiff in proportion to their respective share of the market.
Market share liability is a legal theory that can be used in product liability cases where it is difficult or impossible to determine which specific defendant is responsible for the harm caused to the plaintiff. Under this theory, each defendant who manufactured or sold a product that was involved in causing the harm is held liable for a portion of the damages, based on their respective share of the relevant market.
In successful market share liability cases, each defendant is typically required to pay damages in proportion to their share of the market, as determined by the court.
To know more about liability, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/18484315
#SPJ4
Which is these is most common likely contribute to a sexually hostile work environment
Answers
Answer: b
Explanation:
Answer:
Actions that can contribute to a hostile environment include sexual assaults or offensive touching of employees, demanding sexual favors from subordinates, and sexually oriented statements, comments, jokes, or pictures that are intended to create an intimidating or offensive workplace.
HURRY PLEASE You pay $38.76 for a phone case, a selfie-stick, and 2 USB drives. The phone case costs $14.29 and the selfie-stick costs $10.49. The USB drives cost the same amount. How much does each USB drive cost
Answers
Answer:
$0.78 i think
Explanation:
Answer:
12.235
Explanation:
BECAUSE
Why is DNA profiling not more commonly used in criminal investigations?
Answers
Answer:
DNA can be used to identify criminals with incredible accuracy when biological evidence exists. ... In cases where a suspect is identified, a sample of that person's DNA can be compared to evidence from the crime scene. The results of this comparison may help establish whether the suspect committed the crime.
Explanation:
LAW:
What does the Bad Frog case stand for? Do you agree with any of the
courts' decisions? How would you have ruled and why if you were the
judge in this case?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The Bad Frog case is a legal case that involves the First Amendment rights of a beer company. The court's decisions vary, but it primarily stands for the protection of free speech. However, if I were the judge, I would have ruled in favor of the beer company, as I believe in upholding freedom of expression.