The civic and commercial heart of Athens, which developed around the ancient track of the Panathenaic Way entering the city from the northwest and leading to the Acropolis, was the Athenian:

The question is incomplete but I have the entire one:

Which practice was more likely to be accepted after the scientific revolution than before?

A. Scientists deriving much of their knowledge from the Bible

B. Scientists claiming that the Earth was at the center of the solar

system

C. Scientists challenging traditional beliefs about the way the

universe works

D. Scientists attending universities controlled by the Catholic Church

Answer:

B). Scientists claiming that the Earth was at the center of the solar system.

What was revolutionary about the Scientific Revolution? How did the study of nature in the 16th century differ from the study of nature in the Middle Ages?

Disclaimer: I can only write with confidence about paradigm shifts between medieval and Renaissance alchemy.

Here's what Robert Boyle wrote in The Sceptical Chymist (1661):

And, to prevent mistakes, I must advertize you, that I now mean by elements, as those chymists that speak plainest do by their principles, certain primitive or simple, or perfectly unmingled bodies; which not being made of any other bodies, or of one another, are the ingredients of which all those called perfectly mixt bodies are immediately compounded, and into which they are ultimately resolved: now whether there be any such body to be constantly met with in all, and each, of those that are said to be elemented bodies, is the thing I now question.

[Note: I realize this is not from the 16th Century, but the 16th Century is just too soon if you want solid answers about the differences you are inquiring about.]

Bear with me here because this might get a bit out of hand.

In The Birth of the Clinic, Michel Foucault explains in great detail what he refers to as the "medical gaze" of the 19th Century. According to Foucault, the "medical gaze" was a state of mind in which physicians at the time were able to "gaze" upon any number of patients and read and interpret the various signs in order to determine the symptoms.

For example, let's say two patients have pneumonia, but one patient coughs violently whereas the other patient simply wheezes. Both possess the symptom of fluid in the lungs, but the signs are completely different.

For Foucault, the "medical gaze" represents a newfound perception of nature anticipating the advent of what we now call structural linguistics. In structural linguistics, language consists of two elements--the sign and the signified, where the sign is the symbol or word on the page and the signified is the meaning. According to Ferdinand de Saussure, the founder of structural linguistics, the sign is completely arbitrary: we agree to call red "red", but we could just as easily agree to call red "farfignuggen" and none would be the wiser.

So the signified is static, but the sign can be dynamic. This is the crux of the "medical gaze": regardless of how many different signs there are (coughing, wheezing, heaving breathing), the physician can still read and interpret those signs in order to determine the symptom (fluid in the lungs). The signs are dynamic, the symptom is static.

Now let's answer your question.

Up until Robert Boyle wrote The Sceptical Chymist, alchemists approached nature the same way physicians approached symptoms in the 19th Century.

During the Middle Ages, every aspect of nature--from wood to metal to the planets themselves--consisted of two opposing elements, Mercury and Sulphur. The problem is that the signs alchemists used to signify those elements changed as if based on the time of day. For one alchemist, Mercury was a woman bearing buckets of water from a well. For another, Mercury was a green lion. For others, Mercury was simply Quicksilver. The element remained the same (for the most part) all the way into the Renaissance, but the signs (woman with water, green lion, quicksilver, etc) changed constantly.

While the signs of symptoms changed based on patients' immune systems, the signs of Mercury changed based on which alchemist was writing about Mercury.

And while Foucault called attention to the "medical gaze" of the 19th Century, one could just as easily call attention to an "alchemist's gaze" of the Middle Ages and the Early Renaissance.

Robert Boyle changed all of that. He came out and he said, "Forget this fickleness! We need one sign and one sign only. And we need to agree! No more calling this element by ten different names. No more correspondence systems. We need to agree and we need to do it now."

Of course, I am paraphrasing in a rather silly way, but that's the gist of what he meant when he wrote the passage I quoted at the beginning. What eventually became a rising trend in medicine was an old trend in alchemy that needed to be quashed for completely different reasons.

So it's not a matter of how the 16th Century differed from the Middle Ages, but how the Late Renaissance called an end to the fickleness of the Natural Philosophy that preceded it.

Frederick Douglass is a skilled writer and often uses strong and precise language in his writing. In the given sentences, the one that best demonstrates Douglass’s use of precise adjectives is "I had known what it was to be kindly treated; they had known nothing of the kind.

Douglass had experienced a lot of mistreatment and cruelty during his time as a slave, but he had also encountered people who had shown him kindness. Douglass used this specific adjective to highlight the nature of the treatment he received.

He was not simply treated well; he was treated with kindness, a word that is more impactful and precise. By describing the other boys as having "known nothing of the kind," Douglass contrasts his experience with theirs and emphasizes the importance of the kindness that he was shown.

To know more about highlight visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29561974

#SPJ11

Answer:

Charlemagne's court

Explanation:

Charlemagne (Charles the great) also called Charles I, was king of Frank and Lombards,  crowned the emperor of Rome in 800 A.D. Charlemagne was known for his political capabilities and military skills. During that period, few people educated. Einhard was the among the literate people who was a Frankish historian and court scholar who presented information on Charlemagne and the Carolingian Empire. His writings are still studied by historians and examined court events.  

Answer:

in search of gold

Explanation:

It began with the Portuguese, who went to West Africa in search of gold. The first Europeans to come to Africa's West Coast to trade were funded by Prince Henry, the famous Portuguese patron, who hoped to bring riches to Portugal.

Answer:

B.High gas prices and oil shortages

Explanation:

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣴⣶⣿⣿⣷⣶⣄⣀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣾⣿⣿⡿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⡟⠁⣰⣿⣿⣿⡿⠿⠻⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣾⣿⣿⠏⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢻⣿⣿⣇⠀⠀⠀

⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⣼⣿⣿⡏⠀⢠⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⣿⣿⡀⠀⠀

⠀⠀⠀⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀

⠀⠀⢰⣿⣿⡿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠘⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣸⣿⣿⣿⠁⠀⠀

⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠁⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠻⣿⣿⣿⣷⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀

⠀⢰⣿⣿⡇⠀⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀

⠀⢸⣿⣿⡇⠀⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⠛⠛⠉⢉⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

⠀⢸⣿⣿⣇⠀⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣤⣤⣤⡀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⠀⠀⠀

⠀⠀⢻⣿⣿⣶⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣦⡀⠀⠉⠉⠻⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀

⠀⠀⠀⠛⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠹⣿⣿⣇⣀⠀⣠⣾⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣤⣤⣤⣤⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠀⠀⠀

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠋⠉⠛⠋⠉⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀

High gas prices and oil shortages were a major problems for the United States in the late 1970s. Thus option B is correct.

An issue is typically thought of as a work, a circumstance, or a person that is challenging to handle or control because of its complexities and opaqueness. In common parlance, an issue is a question put out for resolution or a claim made for investigation or evidence.

In response to the U.S. decision to arm Israel, the Arab delegation of OPEC imposed an oil sales blockade on the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Japan, and also the Netherlands. The embargo rocked the oil industry and decreased demand.

As a result of the crisis and rising oil costs, many nations experienced stalled economic development. So there were legitimate supply issues, some of the price increase was due to the perception of a catastrophe. Therefore, option B is the correct option.

Learn more about problem, Here:

https://brainly.com/question/29774647

#SPJ2

Answer:

B

Explanation:

plz help me with my most recent question.

Answer:

With British troops in Boston and a rebellion stewing, Revere became a master propagandist, using his artisan skills to craft engravings that incited the colonists to join in the rebellion.

The growing unrest boiled over on March 5, 1770, when British troops and a crowd of colonists faced off on Boston’s King Street near the Customs house. The tense standoff ended in the Boston Massacre, as the British used their bayonet rifles to shoot and kill five unarmed colonists.

One of Reveres’ best-known pieces of propaganda depicted the violent night. He reworked a Henry Pelham drawing in an engraving and widely distributed prints of the stark image of armed British troops taking aim at the colonists.

Explanation:

The Pianist:

1) One of the first nights in the Ghetto, the German officers visit the Jewish families and one man is in a wheelchair and cannot stand to meet them. They take him outside and throw him over the balcony along with his wheelchair.

This scene is so memorable because it is so beyond terrible and absolutely unheard of in our society. It is the first scene in the film of terror and Jewish oppression.

2) At one point the German officers force the Jews to line up and randomly select a few people to lay down, face first, on the street. One officer then proceeds to shoot each one in the head. Upon reaching the last man, he runs out of bullets and the man is forced to wait as the officer reloads his gun.

This scene is very powerful because the when the last man realizes the officer has run out of bullets, visible hope dawns on his face, but it is quickly shut down as the officer slowly reloads his gun to finish the job.

Answer:

mark me brainlies

Explanation:

Britain u the success of his foreign policy plans

Answer: 44, Eurasia

Explanation:

Answer:

A. The congress worked to establish a balance of power throughout Europe.

B.The congress wanted to set up a strong dictatorship.

C. The congress worked to make one country more powerful than the rest.

D. The congress wanted to take power from the monarchs.

The answer is A. The congress worked to establish a balance of power throughout Europe.

Explanation:

The Congress helped to establish a balance of power in Europe. It ensured no country felt too important or big in the obedience of the laid down rules. This also helped the countries to steer clear from trouble as none of them wanted a repeat of the wars which had just ended.

Answer:

the answer is A

Explanation:

Kent State students responded by staging their anti-war protest in the 1970s as a result of the bombing of Cambodia.

President Nixon believed that North Vietnam was transporting troops and goods through neighboring Cambodia to South Vietnam.

He hoped that bombing the Cambodian supply channels would weaken the enemies of the United States. The Cambodian bombing continued until August 1973.

Thus, In May 1970, students protested the "Cambodian bombing" by US troops.

To learn more about  "Cambodian bombing", refer:

https://brainly.com/question/10546836

Answer:

The bombing of Cambodia

Explanation:

Edgen: 2023

Jimmy Carter sacked some of his cabinet members in 1979. During the OPEC oil crisis, he spent ten days in Camp David. He dismissed numerous members of his government and delivered a speech criticizing the spirit of the country. So, all of these are correct.

Carter's more constrained proposal for health insurance reform, requiring employers to offer private catastrophic health insurance which was made in June 1979. As part of the proposal, Medicare would receive catastrophic coverage, and Medicaid would be expanded to include the extremely poor without dependent young children.

The Camp David Accords, which produced a durable peace between Egypt and Israel, were Carter's primary foreign policy achievement. In his "Crisis of Confidence" speech (sometimes known as the "malaise" speech) on July 15, 1979, President Carter described his initiatives to lower oil imports and boost energy efficiency . Carter urged people to take any action they could to use less energy in his remarks.

To know more about OPEC oil crisis

brainly.com/question/4054099

#SPJ4

The war provided Great Britain enormous territorial gains in North America, but disputes over subsequent frontier policy and paying the war's expenses led to colonial discontent, and ultimately to the American Revolution.

War is an intense armed conflict[a] between states, governments, societies, or paramilitary groups such as mercenaries, insurgents, and militias. It is generally characterized by extreme violence, destruction, and death using regular or irregular military forces. Warfare refers to the common activities and characteristics of types of wars or wars in general. Total war is warfare that is not limited to purely legitimate military objectives and can result in massive suffering and loss of civilians or other non-combatants.

While some scholars of war studies view war as a universal and gendered aspect of human nature, others argue that it is the result of specific sociocultural, economic, or ecological circumstances.

Learn more about  war   here

https://brainly.com/question/1120447

#SPJ4

Yes, I have heard of the Northwest Indian War. It has become one of America's "forgotten wars" as it was overshadowed by the American Revolution, it did not involve any major battles, and it was part of a larger struggle for control of the West.

The war memory may be different from Indigenous Americans perspective as it represented a part of long struggle against colonization and forced displacement.

The Northwest Indian War took place between 1785 and 1795 and was fought between Native American tribes and the United States over control of the Northwest Territory. The Northwest Indian War has become one of America's "forgotten wars" for a variety of reasons.

The memory of the war would likely be very different from the perspective of Indigenous Americans. For them, the war was part of a long history of resistance to colonization and forced displacement. The war represented a threat to their way of life and their very survival, and its consequences were felt long after the fighting ended.

Today, we can represent those experiences by acknowledging the contributions and sacrifices of Indigenous people in the conflict, highlighting their perspectives and experiences, and working to address the ongoing legacy of colonization and oppression. We can also work to elevate Indigenous voices in our historical narratives and promote greater understanding and respect for their cultures and histories.

Learn more about Northwest Indian War:

https://brainly.com/question/29387221

#SPJ11

Answer:

d- the state has a diversified employment base

Explanation:

i got it right on edge 2021

Answer:

d

Explanation:

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 applies to companies with 15 or more employees.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a landmark legislation in the United States that prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It applies to various aspects of employment, including hiring, firing, promotion, and compensation.

However, it does not apply to all companies. The act specifically applies to companies with 15 or more employees, regardless of whether they hire on a seasonal basis or not. Smaller companies with less than 15 employees are not covered by the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

To know more about Legislation, visit:

brainly.com/question/15522014

#SPJ11

Answer:

A fund-raising mechanism in politics.

Answer: ANSWER IS C

Explanation:

Answer:

Time: When was the cartoon created? Look for the date. What else

was happening historically at this time?

Action: What is going on in the cartoon? For example, are the people

asleep, marching, fighting, angry, or laughing?

Caption: What does the cartoon label say? What do you think it

means? Does the caption support the action in the cartoon? Is it critical

of the action?

Objects: What familiar objects or people do you recognize in the

cartoon? (Identify two or three.) Are any of the people or objects

exaggerated in size or action? Do any of the objects/people lead you to

recognize a point of view and/or stereotypes? Do you see objects/people

that you cannot recognize? How could you find out about them?

S ummary: Based on the time, action, caption, and objects, what do

you think the author of the cartoon was trying to say? Try to identify the

tone of the cartoon—satirical, negative, supportive, partisan, proAmerican, pro-British, etc.).

Explanation:

Political cartoons present concise opinions or pointed criticism about issues and events that

are provocative and hard hitting. Your job is to identify, defend, and challenge the drawing’s

main argument. Be aware that political cartoons are deceptively simple. They are not the

“funnies” in the Sunday paper. They are one sided and contain slant and bias. Further, they

often require certain prior knowledge and life experiences in order to be fully understood.

They also rely heavily upon symbols and images, and the lack of text creates an additional

challenge. This is where having a structured plan for analysis will be incredibly helpful. One

such plan is the TACOS strategy.

Answer:

poetry or stories

Explanation:

How do you determine the theme of a poem?

The speaker in a poem reflects on a topic by saying what he or she thinks and feels about it. You can use these reflections and other details in a poem to figure out that poem's message, or theme. Identify the theme of this comic strip by studying what the characters say and do.

Types of Themes in Poems

Hope this helps, have a nice day/night! :D

The correct interpretation of the excerpt is that "Though Ahab is physically weakened, his will for revenge has strengthened him."

Based on the given excerpt, the meaning can be interpreted as follows: Ahab, the central character in the text, is portrayed as having a special kind of madness that is so intense that it overwhelms his general sanity. This intense madness has turned all of his focus and energy onto his obsessive desire for revenge.

Despite physically being weakened, Ahab's will for revenge has grown even stronger, making him a formidable force. In other words, his anger and desire for revenge have given him a renewed sense of purpose and determination, making him more powerful than ever before.

The meaning of the excerpt is that Ahab's special kind of madness has overtaken his general sanity, leading him to focus all of his energy and strength on his desire for revenge. This intense desire has actually made him more powerful, despite his physical weakness.

For more such questions on interpretation, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/29765108

#SPJ8

Answer:

British commander: Charles Cornwallis

The continental army surrounding the british

Explanation:

idk i tried

The first Jewish member of the United States Supreme Court, appointed by Woodrow Wilson, was Louis D. Brandeis. There were five choices given, and the correct answer is option A.

Abraham Cahan, Bernard Baruch, Benjamin Cardozo, and Felix Frankfurter were not the first Jewish member of the United States Supreme Court. As a result, they are not the correct answers. The first Jewish member of the United States Supreme Court was Louis D. Brandeis.

The President of the United States, Woodrow Wilson, appointed him. Louis Dembitz Brandeis was his full name. He was born on November 13, 1856, in Louisville, Kentucky, and died on October 5, 1941, in Washington, D.C.

He was an American lawyer and Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1916 to 1939. Woodrow Wilson nominated him to the position of Supreme Court Justice, and he became the first Jewish Justice.

To know more about united states supreme court refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30028163#

#SPJ11

During the period between 1789 and 1840, the state of Georgia used various methods to distribute land to its citizens at a low cost. These methods included land lotteries, headright grants, and sale of public lands.

However, there was one method that was not used by the state to cheaply distribute land to Georgians during this period, which is the subject of this question.Firstly, land lotteries were a popular method used by Georgia to distribute land to its citizens during this period. The state divided its land into different districts and then drew lots to determine who would receive the land. In this way, the state was able to distribute large tracts of land to many Georgians at a low cost. Land lotteries were held periodically during this period, and they were open to all white male citizens over the age of 21 who were residents of Georgia for a certain period of time. Land lotteries were especially popular in the early years of the state, as the state had a large amount of land that it wanted to distribute quickly to its citizens.Secondly, headright grants were another method used by Georgia to distribute land to its citizens. Headright grants were given to individuals who brought new settlers to Georgia. The state would grant the individual a certain amount of land for every person they brought to Georgia. In this way, the state was able to encourage settlement and population growth in the state. Headright grants were also used to reward soldiers and other individuals who had served the state in some way.Thirdly, the sale of public lands was another method used by Georgia to distribute land to its citizens. Public lands were lands owned by the federal government that were located within the boundaries of Georgia. Georgia was able to purchase these lands from the federal government at a low cost and then resell them to its citizens. The state used the proceeds from the sale of public lands to fund various state projects, such as building roads and bridges.

To Know more about Georgia visit:

brainly.com/question/29563820

#SPJ11

The goals of Marcus Garvey and the UNIA are  :1. Pan-Africanism and black nationalism 2 Economic empowerment, 3. Cultural upliftment

Marcus Garvey was a black nationalist and pan-Africanist who founded the Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) in 1914. The organization was established to unite African diasporic people and to improve their economic, social, and political conditions.  

Marcus Garvey and the UNIA promoted the idea of Pan-Africanism and black nationalism. The movement aimed to unite people of African descent worldwide and promote black pride and self-reliance. The UNIA advocated for the creation of an independent black state in Africa where people of African descent could live free from the oppression of white-dominated societies.

Economic empowerment The UNIA also focused on improving the economic conditions of black people. Garvey believed that economic self-sufficiency was necessary for black people to achieve true independence and equality. The organization established the Black Star Line, a shipping company that aimed to promote trade between black people and to provide jobs for black workers

Cultural upliftment Garvey and the UNIA believed in promoting black culture and history. They aimed to create a sense of pride and self-respect among black people by celebrating their cultural heritage. The organization held cultural events, such as the annual International Convention of the UNIA, where people could come together and celebrate their shared identity as people of African descent.

Know more about nationalism here:

https://brainly.com/question/1018147

#SPJ11

Answer: it helped them produce more crops

Explanation:

Answer:

B!

Explanation: