Making sure that people with disabilities have the same opportunities and rights as everyone else is the goal of the legislation.
What is said regarding disabilities in the Equality Act?
According to the Equality Act of 2010, you cannot be treated differently just because you have a disability. Someone believes you are disabled (this is known as discrimination by perception) You have a relationship with a person who is disabled (this is known as discrimination by association)
What ailments are regarded as disabilities?
According to the law, disability is defined as the incapacity to do any substantial gainful activity (SGA) due to any medically determinable physical or mental impairment(s) that can be expected to cause death or that have lasted or can be expected to last for at least one year.
To know more about disabilities act visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11749979
#SPJ4
every state has adopted some version of article 2 of the uniform commercial code (ucc) that has resulted in
Every state has adopted some version of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which has resulted in a more consistent and unified legal framework.
This standardization facilitates smoother commerce and reduces legal uncertainties between parties from different states. Every state in the United States has adopted some version of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Article 2 of the UCC establishes rules for the sale of goods in commercial transactions. It defines the rights and obligations of both the buyer and seller, including warranties, delivery, payment, and remedies for breaches of contract. The purpose of adopting Article 2 of the UCC is to provide a consistent legal framework for commercial transactions across all states.
Learn more about Uniform Commercial Code here: brainly.com/question/30334021
#SPJ11
Question 2 Which is not one of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment? A) My client did it but is insane. B) My client did it for a good reason. C) My client did it D) My client did not do it.
One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.
Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.
Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.
The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.
Learn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/26318342
#SPJ9
Which of the following is a litigant in a criminal trial?
The person accused
The attorneys
The court reporter
The clerk of the court
Answer:The attorney
Explanation:It is always the person who is suing.
Should some citizens bear more responsibility in a society then others?
Answer ASAP
giving brainliest
what is the formal investigation prior to trial in which the defense uses various methods to obtain information from the prosecution to prepare for trial?
Answer:
Explanation:0000000000000000000000000
Help!!!!!!!!!!!!
A woman with a prior history of drunk driving was involved in a hit and run of a three-year-old girl. The jury found her guilty of manslaughter, acknowledging that she didn’t know the girl and didn’t plan to hit her. The judge sentenced her to 10 years in prison, citing that her careless and illegal behavior cost a young life and caused pain to a family. What goal of law enforcement does the judge’s reason cover?
general deterrence
incapacitation
punishment
rehabilitation
Answer: i think it's C, they want her to deal with the consequences
Answer:
general deterrence
Explanation:
it occurred accidentally it wasn't intentional
How has the U.S. Supreme Court defined the legal use of the death penalty?
The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
In 1969, the federal government estimated that consumer products caused 30,000 deaths, 110,000 disabling
causing the majority of harm was
O automobiles.
O children's toys.
O power tools.
O food products.
The item that the federal government said caused the majority of harm in 1969 was A. automobiles.
How much harm did automobiles cause ?During the late 1960s and early 1970s, there was growing concern in the United States about the safety of consumer products, including automobiles. In response, the federal government established the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in 1970 to regulate the safety of motor vehicles and reduce the number of deaths and injuries caused by automobile accidents.
In 1969, the same year the federal government estimated the number of deaths and injuries caused by consumer products, there were approximately 50,000 fatalities and 1.6 million injuries related to motor vehicle accidents in the United States.
Find out more on consumer products at https://brainly.com/question/1178288
#SPJ1
t/f The two forces of a 3rd law pair always act on different objects
The given statement "The two forces of a 3rd law pair always act on different objects" is True because according to Newton's third law of motion, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
This law highlights the reciprocal nature of forces in a physical interaction between two objects. When one object exerts a force on a second object, the second object simultaneously exerts a force of equal magnitude but in the opposite direction on the first object.
It is important to note that the forces involved in a third law pair always act on different objects. This principle ensures that the action and reaction forces are exerted on separate entities within the system. For example, if you push a wall, the force you apply is the action force, and the reaction force is exerted by the wall on your body. The action force acts on the wall, while the reaction force acts on you.
This concept holds true for various scenarios. When a person walks on the ground, their foot exerts a force backward on the ground (action), and the ground simultaneously exerts an equal and opposite force forward on the person's foot (reaction). Similarly, when a rocket propels itself through space, the action force is generated by the expulsion of gas out of the rocket's engine, and the reaction force is the forward thrust that propels the rocket in the opposite direction.
To know more about law of motion :
https://brainly.com/question/29227915
#SPJ4
What is the administrative law?
Answer:
Administrative law is the law that governs the administrative actions. ... It governs the executive and ensures that the executive treats the public fairly. Administrative law is a branch of public law. It deals with the relationship of individuals with the government.
Explanation:
Answer:
Administrative law is the law that governs administrative actions. It governs the executive and ensures that the executive treats the public fairly. Administrative law is a branch of public law. It deals with the relationship of individuals with the government.
Explanation:
100% on Edge. 2022
ang bakuna ng mga bata tulad ng polio at iba pa ay libre sa health center? tama. .o. mali.
Answer:
TAMA
Explanation:
Answer:
TAMA
Explanation:
hope it helps you have a good day keep smiling be happy stay safe ☺️write an analysis about the similarities and differences you have found about explosions and arson, and provide your thoughts as to which process you believe sounds more difficult and why
Explain the social forces vs personal agency debate and apply that lens to the documentary Made In America. Please cite specifics from the film to support your response.
Answer:
Hey there! I’m Billy, the guy behind BRB | Gone Somewhere Epic. I’ve been travelling around the world for six years, having an absolute blast going on epic adventures, without breaking the bank
Explanation:
Known as the world’s largest democracy, India is a truly fascinating country with a very proud people. It’s so awesome that I’ve been fortunate to visit India four times, and yearn to go back again.
Did you know: India was once an island, and even a part of Antarctica! About 50 million years ago, it connected with the Asian continental plate, and the Himalayas was born.
So I put together a compilation of the most incredible facts about this amazing country, including unusual, shocking, and lesser-known facts that will leave you in awe.
Did you also know: 47 is not only the number of awesome facts in this post, but is also the year (1947) that India became an independent nation!
Scroll on to read more amazing, fun, random, and interesting facts about India with pictures.
What does a traffic control officer do
Answer:
Summary of Duties: A Traffic Officer patrols an assigned area on foot, bicycle, or in a vehicle to enforce motor vehicle parking regulations; issues warnings or citations for illegal parking by entering information into a hand-held computer; impounds vehicles; and directs vehicular and pedestrian traffic at a specific
Explanation:
Answer:
they control traffic
Explanation:
they tell when the cars go and when the stop
In Batson v. Kentucky, the United States Supreme Court ruled that gender-based peremptory challenges in civil cases violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Group of answer choices true false
In Batson v. Kentucky, the United States Supreme Court ruled that gender-based peremptory challenges in civil cases violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.The statement is false.
In Batson v. Kentucky, the United States Supreme Court ruled that gender-based peremptory challenges in civil cases violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.It is not about gender-based peremptory challenges, but about race-based peremptory challenges that violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Batson v. Kentucky was a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court found that the use of peremptory challenges to strike jurors based on their race violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The Court held that when a defendant shows that the prosecutor has used peremptory challenges to exclude a potential juror based solely on race, the trial court must determine whether the prosecutor has a race-neutral explanation for the peremptory strike. In conclusion, the case was not about gender-based peremptory challenges, but race-based ones, thus the statement is false.
Learn more about gender-based peremptory challenges here https://brainly.com/question/25391704
#SPJ11
An organization just completed a security audit. Your division was cited for not conforming to x. 509 requirements. What is the first security control you need to examine?.
The first security control that needs to be examined in relation to X.509 requirements is the implementation of a valid and trusted certificate authority (CA) infrastructure.
X.509 is a widely adopted standard for public key infrastructure (PKI), which includes digital certificates used for secure communication. To conform to X.509 requirements, the organization must ensure that a robust CA infrastructure is in place. This involves evaluating the CA's policies, procedures, and practices for issuing, managing, and revoking digital certificates.
Additionally, it is essential to review the CA's compliance with industry best practices, such as key management, certificate validation, and secure storage of private keys. By examining the CA infrastructure, the organization can address the cited non-conformance and improve its adherence to X.509 requirements.
Learn more about Organization
https://brainly.com/question/12825206
#SPJ11
A process by which a government agency authorizes individuals to work in a given occupation after the persom has completed an approved education program and oassea a state board test
Licensure is a process by which a government agency authorizes individuals to work in a given occupation after the person has completed an approved education program and oassea a state board test.
Licensure is a necessary step in many occupations, and it serves an important purpose in protecting the public from untrained practitioners. The licensure process is designed to ensure that individuals have completed the necessary education and training to provide quality service in their chosen field.
This process usually includes a state board exam that tests a person's knowledge and expertise in their field. In order to be authorized to work in an occupation, individuals must complete all of the licensure requirements and obtain the appropriate license from the relevant government agency.
To know more about agency, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/15129864
#SPJ4
The assertion that non-formal institutions have no role to play at the processing stage is an empty rhetoric. comment
The assertion that non-formal institutions have no role in the processing stage is false. Non-formal institutions contribute valuable insights, local knowledge, and innovative approaches, enhancing decision-making processes and ensuring inclusivity.
There is no evidence to support the claim that non-formal institutions play no part in the processing stage. In order to address particular issues and support the work of formal institutions, non formal institutions like community based organizations and grassroots movements are essential. They can offer priceless insights and cutting edge strategies because they have access to local information, expertise and connections with the affected communities.
By obtaining firsthand information and involving a range of stakeholders, non-formal institutions can make sure that the decision making process is more inclusive and representative. They also fill the gaps created by formal institutions by mobilizing resources and offering assistance to people and communities.
It is detrimental to the diversity of solutions and impediments legitimate and effective decision making to ignore the role of non-formal institutions. A more thorough and long lasting solution may result from accepting their contributions.
To know more about non-formal institutions here
brainly.com/question/24271869
#SPJ4
How is a student loan different from a scholarship? A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back. A scholarship must be paid back, but a student loan is not paid back. A student loan is a form of financial aid, but a scholarship is not. A scholarship is a form of financial aid, but a student loan is not.
Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.
Student Loan and scholarshipStudent loan can be defined as borrowing or lending money to cover your school expenses while scholarship is a financial aid or financial assistance to cover your school expenses.
When you borrowed money you are expected to payback but when it comes to scholarship you are not expected to pay back because the money given to you was free.
Inconclusion Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.
Learn more about Student Loan and scholarship here:https://brainly.com/question/488893
the preexisting rule allows for midstream changes to be enforceable in a contract.a. Trueb. false
The given statement "The preexisting rule allows for midstream changes to be enforceable in a contract" is false because The preexisting rule, also known as the preexisting duty rule, generally states that a promise to do something that a party is already legally obligated to do does not constitute valid consideration for a contract.
In other words, if a party is already obligated to perform a certain action under an existing contract or a preexisting legal duty, promising to do that same action in a new agreement does not create additional consideration or make the new agreement enforceable.
Therefore, under the preexisting rule, midstream changes to a contract that involve a party agreeing to perform an action they were already obligated to do would typically not be enforceable due to lack of consideration.
However, it's worth noting that there may be exceptions or variations to the preexisting rule based on jurisdiction and specific circumstances, such as modifications made under a separate agreement or additional consideration provided beyond the preexisting duty.
To know more about contract refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/32254040
#SPJ11
tilda purchases an automobile from ronston. at the time of sale, ronston tells tilda that the car has had only one previous owner and has been driven only 25,000 miles. tilda, relying on these statements, purchases the car. she pays 10 percent down and signs a promissory note to pay the remainder of the purchase price, with interest, in fifteen equal monthly installments. ronston transfers the note to patty. tilda then discovers that the car has actually had three previous owners and has been driven 250,000 miles. which of the following is the legal outcome if patty is a holder in due course (hdc)?group of answer choices
Tilda must pay Patty and also make sure to find recourse with Ronston in the situation given above for finding an appropriate legal outcome.
A legal outcome may be referred to or considered as the result or output, which may not be completely desired, but is as per the legal remedies mentioned under the laws related thereto. As per the law, paying to Patty and finding recourse with Ronston is most likely an appropriate legal outcome of the given condition that can be taken into interpretation by Tilda.
Learn more about legal outcome here:
https://brainly.com/question/25901482
#SPJ4
Complete question
tilda purchases an automobile from ronston. at the time of sale, ronston tells tilda that the car has had only one previous owner and has been driven only 25,000 miles. tilda, relying on these statements, purchases the car. she pays 10 percent down and signs a promissory note to pay the remainder of the purchase price, with interest, in fifteen equal monthly installments. ronston transfers the note to patty. tilda then discovers that the car has actually had three previous owners and has been driven 250,000 miles. what is the appropriate legal outcome if patty is a holder in due course (hdc)?
What did the landmark ruling in the Miranda vs Arizona case determine?
Answer:
it detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
do you think the action of taking the property is fair?
It is no please that I have not been seen
Which is the committee formed by the US Attorney General in 1981
The US Attorney General formed the ___________________ coordinating committee (LECC) in 1981 to faculae cooperation and coordination across law-enforcement agencies at all levels
Explanation:
The law enforcement coordinating committee
hope it helps please mark as brainliest
cooperation between states implies a loss of political sovereignty. group of answer choices false true
False .
Cooperation between states does not necessarily imply a loss of political sovereignty. While it is true that states may sometimes cede a degree of authority in certain areas to facilitate cooperation, this is often done with the understanding that the benefits of such cooperation outweigh the potential loss of autonomy. In many cases, states maintain their political sovereignty while engaging in cooperative agreements, treaties, or international organizations. It is important to recognize that cooperation can actually enhance the ability of states to exercise their sovereignty effectively, particularly in an increasingly interconnected world.
The question of whether cooperation between states implies a loss of political sovereignty is a complex one, and the answer depends on a variety of factors. At its core, political sovereignty refers to a state's ability to exercise authority and control over its territory and people, and to make decisions independently of external actors. The concept of sovereignty is closely linked to ideas of independence, autonomy, and self-determination, and is considered a foundational principle of modern international relations. However, it is important to note that cooperation does not necessarily imply a loss of sovereignty. In fact, many forms of international cooperation are based on the principle of sovereign equality among member states. This means that each state is considered equal in terms of its rights and responsibilities, and that decisions are made through consensus-building and negotiation rather than through imposition or coercion. In this sense, cooperation can actually strengthen a state's sovereignty by providing it with a platform to voice its interests and concerns on the global stage.
To know more about Cooperation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31784454
#SPJ11
In general, explain how the courts have responded to the argument that the First Amendment protects the right to gather news.
Answer: In general, the courts have responded to the argument that the First Amendment protects the right to gather news by recognizing that the freedom of the press is an essential part of a democratic society. The courts have held that the First Amendment protects the right of journalists to gather and disseminate news, and that this right is not limited to members of the traditional news media. However, the courts have also recognized that this right is not absolute and can be subject to reasonable restrictions. For example, the courts have held that journalists may be required to testify in court under certain circumstances, such as when the information they possess is relevant to a criminal investigation. Overall, the courts have generally been supportive of the right to gather news, recognizing its importance to a free and democratic society while also balancing it against other important interests, such as public safety and the administration of justice.
Explanation:
Answer:
Some people think that the First Amendment gives them the right to go anywhere and ask anything in the name of journalism. They believe that they can sneak into private property, record confidential conversations, or demand access to government secrets. Well, the courts have a different opinion. They have ruled that the First Amendment does not grant a special privilege to the press that overrides other laws and rights. They have said that journalists must respect the privacy, property, and security of others, and that they cannot use illegal means to obtain information. The courts have also recognized that some information is legitimately classified or restricted for national security or public safety reasons. So, the next time you see a reporter trying to break into a military base or a celebrity's home, don't be surprised if they end up in jail instead of on the front page.
why does jose like rosita..
Answer:
Rosita. All the birds sing words and the flowers croon…in the Tiki Tiki Tiki Tiki Tiki Room! ... If you've ever visited the Enchanted Tiki Room, you've heard Jose's ... This quick service spot and rest area has tons of dole whip, snacks, and a ... Looks like she's flying solo now, singing and chatting with visitors in ...
Explanation:
Under what circumstances, if any, should people be prohibited from voicing unpopular views?
Answer:
if they use violence or threats especially against a certain person as it can cause emotional stress.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
Voicing Unpopular opinions is apart of Everyone's constitutional Right, and isn't prohibited in any way but is limited.
Explanation:
Everyone has the right to voice their opinion, like who they Want to be President, or Samsung vs iPhone, whatever the matter is you have that right, but is limited, you are not allowed (Using your words) to cause a Public disturbance if their is no threat, like you can't call fire in a Movie theater if their is none, or you can't say "GUN" while the President is speaking or threaten some. It's just not allowed, these aren't considered an Opinion, their just disturbances.
What resolution came about in response to the debate over legislative representation?.
The Great Compromise came in response to the debate over legislative representation
During the summer of 1787 the representatives to the constitutional convention in Philadephia debated for months on one issue which was about how congressional representation would be determined, after much deliberation, the delegates appointed equal state representation in the senate and proportional representation in the house of representation, which is called the "Great Compromise", or also the " Connecticut Compromise". such a unique plan resolved the most controversial aspectof drafting of the constitution for congressional representation.
To know more about The Great Compromise refer to the link https://brainly.com/question/6839536?referrer=searchResults.
To know more about the US. government refer to the link https://brainly.com/question/2496524?referrer=searchResults.
#SPJ4
Guided Practice
In what form of government does one person or a small group of people hold all of the power?
A. a constitution
B. a legislature
c. a democracy
D. a dictatorship