Suppose a politician is critical of a government pollution permit policy that they say allows companies to buy and sell the right to pollute. They argue that the public’s right to breathe clean air and the health of the planet require real regulation instead of this type of government policy
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Firstly, the politician's emphasis on the public's right to breathe clean air highlights the fundamental importance of environmental protection. Clean air is essential for human health and well-being, and it is the government's responsibility to ensure that the air quality meets acceptable standards. By allowing companies to trade pollution permits, there is a risk that certain areas or communities may suffer disproportionately from pollution, especially if those areas are economically disadvantaged or lack political influence. This approach raises questions about environmental justice and the equitable distribution of pollution burdens.
Moreover, the politician's concern for the health of the planet reflects an understanding of the global impact of pollution. Pollution does not respect national boundaries, and its effects can extend far beyond the immediate vicinity of the emitting source. Climate change, in particular, is a pressing global issue that demands collective action. While a market-based approach might incentivize emissions reductions, it may not be sufficient to address the urgency and magnitude of the environmental challenges we face. Comprehensive and enforceable regulations are necessary to ensure that environmental goals are met effectively.
The argument against the government's pollution permit policy highlights the limitations of relying solely on market mechanisms to address environmental problems. Critics of such policies argue that they create a system where companies can simply pay for the right to pollute, effectively commodifying pollution and externalizing the costs onto society. They contend that true regulation, which sets clear standards and enforces compliance, is needed to protect the environment and safeguard public health.
However, it is worth noting that pollution permit systems, such as cap-and-trade programs, can have their advantages. When properly designed and implemented, they can provide flexibility, incentivize emissions reductions, and allow for cost-effective pollution control. By putting a price on pollution, they create economic incentives for companies to adopt cleaner technologies and practices.
Ultimately, finding the right balance between market mechanisms and regulatory approaches is crucial. A comprehensive approach to environmental protection may involve a combination of market-based solutions, such as pollution trading schemes, along with robust regulations and enforcement mechanisms. This would allow for both economic efficiency and environmental effectiveness, ensuring that the public's right to clean air and a healthy planet are adequately protected.
Related Questions
Margaret tells Roy she will give him a new ipad if Roy promises to cut her grass for a month. Roy
promises to do the chores but has not yet begun to do them. Margaret and Roy have formed a(n)
Answers
Margaret and Roy have formed a bilateral contract. A bilateral contract is a type of agreement in which both parties make promises to each other.
In this scenario, Margaret promises to give Roy a new iPad, and Roy promises to cut Margaret's grass for a month. Both parties have exchanged promises, creating a mutual obligation to fulfill their respective commitments.
It's worth noting that for a contract to be enforceable, certain elements must be present, such as an offer, acceptance, consideration (something of value exchanged between the parties), and the intention to create a legal relationship. In this case, Margaret's offer of a new iPad, Roy's acceptance by promising to do the chores, and the consideration of Roy's grass-cutting service all suggest the formation of a valid bilateral contract.
However, it's important to recognize that the performance of the contract has not yet begun, as Roy has not yet started cutting Margaret's grass. Until the duties under the contract are performed or unless there are specific provisions for termination or cancellation, both parties are bound by their promises and have an obligation to fulfill their respective parts of the agreement.
Learn more about service here:
https://brainly.com/question/30418810
#SPJ11
Which part of the First
Amendment says that citizens are allowed to practice
any religion they choose?
A. The separation clause
B. The freedom of association clause
C. The establishment clause
D. The free exercise clause
Answers
T/F federalism is the doctrine that the powers of government are shared between the states and the federal government.
Answers
The given statement, "federalism is the doctrine that the powers of government are shared between the states and the federal government" is true because by federalism, power is shared at two levels over the same area.
Federalism is a form of government in which two levels of authority share control over the same region.
Larger territorial areas are typically governed more broadly by an overarching national government. On the other hand, local concerns are handled by smaller subdivisions, states, and cities.
The central government and the smaller political entities both have the authority to enact laws and enjoy some degree of independence from one another.
The Constitution of the United States established a system of "dual sovereignty," whereby the States preserved some sovereignty while ceding many of their authority to the Federal Government.
The U.S. Constitution lists some instances of this dual sovereignty.
To know more about federalism, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/8305583
#SPJ4
What is the function of the Judicial Branch?
Enforce the Law
Make the Law
Execute the Law
Interpret the Law and settle disputes
Answers
Answer: The judicial branch is in charge of deciding the meaning of laws.
Explanation: Their whole purpose is basically to apply laws to real situations, and whether a law breaks the rules of the Constitution.
Judicial Branch are kind of like the Jury in the court. They are responsible for protecting the rights of the people. They give power to the people. They Have The Power to Get Its Decisions and Judgments Enforced. These are some of the many functions of the Judicial Branch.
Answer:
to settle legal disputes and determine the constitutionality of laws
Explanation:
important role of PDEA in LAW ENFORCEMENT.
Answers
Answer:
The PDEA is a regular law enforcement and regulatory agency which is responsible for the efficient and effective law enforcement of all provisions on any dangerous drug and/or controlled precursors and essential chemicals.
Explanation:
which was used as evidence of the need for the patient protection and affordable care act?
Answers
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was passed in 2010 to provide more access to health care to Americans. Prior to the passage of the PPACA, millions of American citizens were either uninsured or underinsured.
The PPACA was used to address this issue and to make health care more affordable for Americans. Evidence of the need for the PPACA was found in the number of Americans without health insurance, which had been steadily increasing since 2000, and the number of people who had difficulty accessing health care due to cost and other factors.
Additionally, studies showing that the cost of health care was rising faster than incomes were used as evidence that health care was becoming less affordable for many Americans. The PPACA was passed to increase access to health care and make it more affordable for all Americans.
To know more about PPACA , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31598929
#SPJ4
if you felt that the legislature in your state did not reflect the population distribution of the state, what did the baker decision say you could successfully do?
Answers
The Baker decision says that if you felt that the legislature in your state did not reflect the population distribution of the state, you could successfully sue the state and force it to redraw its district lines based on the population's distribution of the state.
The Baker decision was a landmark legal case, Baker v. Carr, that dealt with the issue of legislative redistricting. It was a U.S. Supreme Court case that occurred in 1962. This case dealt with the issue of whether the U.S. courts had jurisdiction over state redistricting cases and whether federal courts could adjudicate state legislative apportionment disputes. The Supreme Court, in a 6–2 decision, held that such issues were justiciable by the federal courts.
The Baker decision came in response to the issue of the urban areas' underrepresentation in the Tennessee state legislature. The Court held that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment allowed the federal courts to intervene in state legislative reapportionment, and that the federal courts had the authority to hear redistricting cases.
The Baker decision is significant because it opened the door for federal courts to examine redistricting disputes. It also established the principle of "one person, one vote," which requires that the representation in legislative districts must be equal across districts, based on population, to comply with the Equal Protection Clause.
Learn more about legislature from:
https://brainly.com/question/809346
#SPJ11
How is a public corporation controlled
Answers
Answer:
Every Public Corporation is placed under a particular ministry and the minister responsible for that ministry takes supervisory responsibility for that corporation. The Boards of Directors are appointed by the Executive and they can dissolve it. The minister has the power to appoint, promote, transfer and dismiss.
DEPPRESSION DECEMBER "WOO HOO"
Answers
Answer:
dang, thanks for free points tho
Explanation:
Answer:
Free answer dude-
Explanation:
which nims command and coordination structures are offsite locations
Answers
One of the four NIMS Command and Coordination structures are emergency operations centers.
EOCs are off-site sites where workers from many agencies get together to: Address immediate threats and dangers. ICS is used to oversee on-scene, tactical-level reaction. The National Incident Management System (NIMS) provides direction for collaboration among all tiers of government, nongovernmental groups, and the corporate sector in order to avoid, defend against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from incidents. By balancing flexibility and standardization, NIMS provides a framework for interoperability and compatibility. In order to manage domestic incidents, the government and the private sector can collaborate through the flexible framework offered by NIMS. The organizational structure of the State Operational Center (SOC) under NIMS corresponds to the fundamental ICS functions. ICS, on the other hand, is a tactical communications system that is field-based, whereas NIMS offers a framework for controlling the event at the local, operating area, region, and state levels.
Learn more about NIMS here
https://brainly.com/question/11121182
#SPJ4
What are the consequences from being caught driving under the influence of alcohol or other
drugs?
A Driver license revocation
B Imprisonment
C Fines
D All of the above
Answers
Answer:
Passports. Driving while under the influence of alcohol can lead to legal consequences in the form of a DUI, fines, court-ordered treatment, jail time, job loss and more. One of the greatest hazards of drinking is that one’s intention, such as simply having a good time, can get lost once the intoxicating effects take hold.
Explanation:
i think its A
What market forces influence wages?
Answers
Answer:The market forces that influence wages are the supply and demand for labor.
Explanation:
Which of these is NOT a reason why a dirt or gravel road can be
dangerous?
A. Your tires are more likely to be punctured
B. There can be gravel or dust kicked back onto your windshield
C. It means you are off the GPS network which is dangerous
D. It’s most likely for your vehicle to lose traction
Answers
Answer:
B. There can be gravel or dust kicked back onto your windshield
Explanation:
Losing the track of a GPS network is not a dangerous for driving on a gravel road or dirt.
What is a gravel road?Gravel road is a road, the upper surface of which is covered with gravel and small crushed stones. There is risk of tires getting punctured, or vehicle to lose traction while driving on such roads.
Hence, option C holds true regarding a gravel road.
Learn more about a gravel road here:
https://brainly.com/question/5215737
#SPJ2
if ramona changes her will at age 88 to leave the bulk of her fortune to her home health care nurse instead of her children, what factor will the courts consider in judging whether or not her will is valid?
Answers
The factor that will be considered by the courts in judging whether or not her will is valid is undue influence.
Undue influence is excessive persuasion performed on someone that causes that someone to act (or refrain from doing a certain act) by overcoming that someone's free will. There are several things that much be considered before determining whether a result was produced by undue influence or not:
The influencer's authority over the victim.Victim's vulnerability.The tactics used by the influencer (intimidation, control, or other actions).In the case above, the courts must determine first whether Ramona's health care nurse is performing undue influence over Ramona before ruling.
Learn more about undue influence at https://brainly.com/question/14363378
#SPJ4
The Legislative Branch of the United States is NOT entrusted with which of the powers listed below?
Answers
It should be: Command of the Armed Forces is the right answer
Why was frauds’ theory in sharp contrast to the theories of Wundt and James
Answers
Freud's theory was known as psychoanalysis, and it postulated that human actions are driven by sexually motivated drives and impulses that are either unconscious or not readily apparent. Both Wundt and James thought that human behavior was the result of conscious choice.
This is further explained below.
What is Freud's theory?Generally, According to Freud's theory of motivation, people's actions, including their spending habits, are influenced by their unconscious motivations and wants. In addition to his medical training, Sigmund Freud is widely recognized as the founder of psychoanalysis.
In conclusion, According to Freud's theory of psychoanalysis, sexually motivated drives and urges lie under the surface of human conduct. Wundt and James both thought that people's actions were deliberate choices.
Read more about Freud's theory
https://brainly.com/question/27999456
#SPJ1
answer the following concepts
1. negligence
2. contributory negligence
3. intentional torts
4. felonies
5. preventive law
6. white collar crime
7. statute
8. strict liability
9. common law
10. judicial review
Answers
Based on the law and legal concepts, and the available question, the explanation for the following legal concept are:
negligence means failure to do obligation, contributory negligence means both parties were negligent, intentional torts mean the wrong action done willingly, felonies mean a crime that leads to one or more years in a jail term, preventive law means laws that reduce litigation, white collar crime means a nonviolent crime, statute means written law made by the legislative, strict liability means liability a defendant is legally responsible for whether the defendant has a fault or not, common law means laws created by judges, judicial review means the process by which the courts review the legality of a previous ruling.What is a Legal Concept?The legal concept is a term that is used to describe the usual words that are considered "register" in the context of legal norms.
Generally, the term legal concept is a word used to illustrate the issue of identifying and interpreting (or constructing) the norms in which certain actions occur, and of using such norms in legal inference.
The words and meaning of legal concepts may be different from the literary meaning of words and sometimes have more elaborate and robust explanations than the actual meaning.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the short explanation of the legal concept of the aforelisted words in the question is described above in the main answer.
Learn more about the Legal concept here: https://brainly.com/question/28601298
#SPJ1
Your testing policies are not meant to discriminate against women, but
women pass your tests at significantly lower rates than men. The test you
are giving has not been professionally developed...indeed, you thought of
random "feats of strength" and not about the particular job at all. Because
you do not intend to discriminate against women, or any other protected
group, there are no employment discrimination claims that can be brought
against you.
True or false.
Answers
Even if you did not mean to be intentional in your discrimination against women, employment discrimination suits can still be brought so this is false.
When can discrimination suits be brought?As long as there is discrimination of women or other protected groups, discrimination suits can be brought.
Discrimination does not have to be intentional or unintentional. The law simply wants to know if there was discrimination. If there was, it is illegal and the intention doesn't count there.
The intention will however count in sentencing and you might receive a lesser punishment for not knowing that you were engaging in discrimination.
Find out more on discrimination at https://brainly.com/question/1084594
#SPJ1
The primary sources of public law include _____. Group of answer choices policies and procedures statutes and penal law the law of obligations the law of contracts or torts
Answers
The primary sources of public law include statutes and penal law.
Public law is the part of law that governs relations between legal persons and a government, between different institutions within a state, between different branches of governments, as well as relationships between persons that are of direct concern to society. Public law comprises constitutional law, administrative law, tax law and criminal law, as well as all procedural law. Laws concerning relationships between individuals belong to private law.
To know more about constitutional law :
https://brainly.com/question/14918421
#SPJ11
Which of these is legal conduct?
Reproducing a copyrighted song and selling it for profit
Patenting a white painted version of a red painted tool
Copyrighting a modification to an existing online game
Using a work computer to order lunch delivery
Answers
Using a work computer to order lunch delivery is a legal conduct
What is legal Conduct?Members of the legal profession are expected to uphold certain ethical standards in their work. They are a result of the growth of the legal field itself.
It should be noted that legality is different from ethics, legality is the state of being in compliance with the law. Concepts of right and wrong behavior are central to ethics.
Even though they may be legal, some people may not consider them to be moral. For instance, it is acceptable to test medications on animals in many nations, despite some people's ethical objections.
Learn more about legal Conduct here:
https://brainly.com/question/28050389
#SPJ1
Based on legal concepts and the available option, the statement that describes the legal conduct is Copyrighting a modification to an existing online game.
What is a Legal Conduct?Legal conduct is a term that is used to describe the principles of conducting activities that are bounded by law and if breached can result in a penalty.
Legal Conduct can be done in many ways, in as much as it follows the rules and regulations postulated by the law of the land or the government.
Given the available options, the statement that describes the legal conduct is the Copyrighting of a modification to an existing online game.
This is because the modification to an existing online game is a different work entirely, that can be protected through copyright. And with copyrights, registered businesses are protected. by law.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Option C. "copyrighting a modification to an existing online game."
Learn more about Legal Conduct here: https://brainly.com/question/13969108
#SPJ1
4. Plaintiffs Amy from Alabama and Vera from Virginia plan to sue defendants Debbie from Delaware and Vernon from Virginia. May Amy and Vera file a joint suit in federal court? (1) Answer "Yes" OR "No." (2) Explain why or why not. (2 points)
Answers
Yew
Explanation:
Mama joe bamab
What is the legal position of persons without combatant status who nevertheless take an active part in hostilities? What are the legal consequences these individuals may face for their conduct?
Answers
The legal status of noncombatants who take an active part in hostilities is a complicated and contentious subject of international law.
People who directly engage in hostilities without being lawful fighters or having status as a combatant are sometimes referred to as "unprivileged belligerents" or "unlawful combatants" under international humanitarian law.
Individuals who engage in hostilities against the law may face prosecution by their state. Typically, these cases are predicated on crimes like terrorism, war crimes, or other criminal behaviors.
Learn more about hostilities, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30331571
#SPJ4
a) Los niños
Y у
las ninas no raconan.
¿Que efectos tiene esta idea en los
niños y las niñois ?
Answers
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Los efectos que tiene esta idea en los niños y las niñas es la siguiente.
Se dice que los niños y las niñas no razonan. Y lo que sucede es que en esta etapa de la infancia el niño se desenvuelve por sus impulsos e imita lo que ve en los adultos.
Los expertos sociólogos comentan que hasta los 9 o 10 años de edad, los infantes no son capaces de razonar lo que hacen, y sólo se dejan llevar por sus impulsos. Por ello, no pueden sopesar las consecuencias de sus actos. Por esos son niños.
A esa edad, les gusta correr, jugar, no distinguen entre sus acciones y se limitan a observar y repetir conductas que observan de sus padres en casa. Como dicen los expertos. A esa edad, los niños son como unas "esponjas y lo absorben todo." Por eso hay que tener cuidado con lo que se les enseña.
in which country on the graph was the recent voter turnout 83 percent?
Answers
QUESTION 4
The concept of "truth-in-sentencing" is closely associated with which perspective
O a. nonintervention.
O b. rehabilitation.
O c.justice.
O d. crime control.
Answers
The concept of "truth-in-sentencing" is closely associated with the perspective of a. nonintervention.
What is "truth-in-sentencing"?"Truth-in-sentencing" is a legal requirement that offenders serve a minimum of 85% of their original sentence before they are considered for parole or early release.
The purpose of "truth-in-sentencing" laws is to ensure that criminal convicts serve a substantial portion of their sentences.
"Truth-in-sentencing" also reduces the discrepancy between an imposed prison sentence and the actual time served.
Thus, the concept of "truth-in-sentencing" is closely associated with the perspective of a. nonintervention until a convict has served the minimum time.
Learn more about "truth-in-sentencing" at https://brainly.com/question/4522269
#SPJ1
1. What is solar eclipse??
Answers
Answer:
A solar eclipse occurs when the Moon passes in front of the Sun causing a shadow to fall on certain portions of the Earth.
Explanation:
A solar eclipse occurs when a portion of the Earth is engulfed in a shadow cast by the Moon which fully or partially blocks sunlight. This occurs when the Sun, Moon and Earth are aligned. Such alignment coincides with a new moon indicating the Moon is closest to the ecliptic plane
When is a confession not a confession? When is it’s involuntary, coerced or downright false? Provide examples from the Confession Tapes documentary
Answers
In the Confession Tapes documentary, several cases are highlighted where confessions may not be reliable or accurate due to being involuntary, coerced, or false.
Here are a few examples:
1. Case of Atif Rafay and Sebastian Burns: In this case, the two defendants were accused of a triple murder. The documentary examines how their confessions were obtained after lengthy interrogations, involving psychological pressure, manipulation , and false promises of leniency. The confessions were later retracted, and the defendants claimed they were coerced into confessing to a crime they did not commit.
2. Case of Adrian Thomas: Adrian Thomas was accused of killing his infant son. The documentary explores how his confession was obtained through a prolonged and intense interrogation, during which the police used manipulative techniques, fed him details of the crime, and coerced him into confessing. The confession was later ruled inadmissible in court due to its involuntary nature.
3. Case of Russell Williams: Russell Williams, a former Canadian military officer, confessed to multiple crimes, including ual assault and murder. However, the documentary delves into the circumstances surrounding the confession, suggesting that it may have been coerced or obtained under duress due to the extreme psychological pressure exerted on him during the interrogation.
These examples highlight the potential issues with confessions when they are obtained through coercive tactics, psychological manipulation, or under duress. It underscores the importance of ensuring that confessions are voluntary, informed, and free from undue influence or coercion to maintain their reliability and accuracy.
Learn more about manipulation here:
https://brainly.com/question/28459068
#SPJ11
Which of the following are characteristics of the executive branch as outlined by Article II of the United States Constitution?
I and II only.
I and IV only.
II and III only.
III and IV only.
Answers
The section that are characteristics of the executive branch as outlined by Article II of the United States Constitution is II and III only.
What informs Article II of the United States Constitution?Article Two of the United States Constitution showcases the executive branch of the federal government, which carries out and enforces federal laws.
Article II eatablished the Executive Branch and the offices of the President and Vice President. It explains the rules for electing the President (through the Electoral College), eligibility (must be a natural-born citizen at least 35 years old), and term length. The 12th and 25th Amendments modified some of these rules.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above
learn more about Article II of the United States: https://brainly.com/question/28768341
#SPJ1
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Answers
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
Two guarantees that the General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade (GATT) provides to its member states are most favored nation (MFN) status and promotion of equality in trade among member states.
True or False
Answers
"The given statement about GATT is true. The GATT was founded in 1947 to decrease barriers in global trade. "
"The "General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade" or GATT is a contract amongst countries, whose main motive was to foster worldwide trade by decreasing trade barriers like tariffs and quotas. The most necessary and effective fundamental rules incorporated in the GATT are the basic rules of "reciprocity'' and two "non-discrimination" rules, that are "Most Favored Nation", MFN and national treatment. GATT promotes the regulations of “rights” and “obligations”. It is nearly related with the MFN principles."
To learn more about GATT,
https://brainly.com/question/14618803
#SPJ1