Answer:
so hard questions I can't answer it pls sorry
What are the similarities and differences between the Platt Amendment and the Roosevelt Corollary?.
The Roosevelt Corollary and the Platt Amendment were tools used by the United States to defend the interests and dominance they had established in Latin America. The United States appeared to defend the interests of countries in Latin America in both instances.
How do the Roosevelt Corollary and the Platt Amendment compare?
The Roosevelt Corollary widened the scope of the Platt Amendment and declared the United States to be the "policeman" of the entire Western Hemisphere, with the authority to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries in order to maintain stability.
What did the Roosevelt Corollary serve to accomplish?The corollary said that not only were the countries of the Western Hemisphere closed to colonization by European powers, but that it was the United States' duty to uphold order and safeguard people's lives and property there.
To learn more about Platt Amendment visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1100569
#SPJ4
Discuss and summarize the importance of building laws and codes
to the architecture practice.
The importance of building laws and codes to the architecture practice is that it ensures the safety, health, and welfare of the public by providing minimum standards for the design, construction, and maintenance of buildings.
Building codes are a set of regulations that must be followed when constructing buildings to ensure that they meet minimum standards for safety, fire protection, energy efficiency, and other critical areas. Architects are required to stay up-to-date with the latest building codes and regulations to ensure that their designs meet the minimum standards and comply with local laws. Failure to comply with building codes and regulations can result in fines, legal action, or even loss of life. Therefore, building laws and codes are crucial to the architecture practice to ensure the safety and well-being of the public.
To learn more about building code visit: https://brainly.com/question/31032521
#SPJ11
The case of Frye vs. United States focused on
as long as the child is in a safety seat, it doesn't matter if they are strapped into a front passenger seat or a back passenger seat.
can the evidence seen when initially entering the house be used in court as evidence of his guilt?
Yes, The evidence discovered upon first entering the house may be utilized in court to prove his guilt.
Which or which kind of evidence are not allowed in court?Anything that violates the law or the rules of the court is not admissible evidence. For instance, hearsay evidence or evidence collected illegally is not admissible. Additionally, it might not be accepted if information is not directly related to the dispute. Evidence that is detrimental may also render it inadmissible in court.
What two conditions must be met before a piece of evidence can be used in court?Criminal cases (a) (1) The defendant may demonstrate that the moral quality at issue in the alleged conduct is consistent with his or her decent moral character. (2) The prosecution may not establish the defendant's bad moral character as it relates to the moral characteristic at issue in the alleged offense, unless in rebuttal.
To know more about admissible evidence, visit:
brainly.com/question/29550883
#SPJ4
Riley, who is three years old, has never met her dad since he was sent to the state penitentiary for check fraud just after she was born. He was sentenced to five years for his part in the scam. One day when she returns from daycare. he is waiting there to meet her. What MOST likelv hannener to Riley's father?
As Riley father was sentenced to five years for his part in the scam but, in one he waits daycare to meet her, what has most likely happened to Riley's father is he was released early on parole.
What is a parole in law?Basically, a parole refers to the conditional release of prisoners before they complete their sentence. The paroled prisoners are alwats supervised by a public official, usually called a parole officer. If the paroled prisoners violate the conditions of their release, they may be returned to prison.
For example, a paroled prisoners must get and keep a job, avoid drugs and alcohol, avoid their victims, not commit any crimes, and report regularly to their parole officer. But if the paroled prisoner violated his parole by violently assaulting someone, he would probably be returned to prison. If he ran a stop sign, he probably would not be.
Read more about parole
brainly.com/question/14467348
#SPJ1
Is a security officer justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone?
A security officer is not justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone.
A security officer is a professional who is trained to secure and protect individuals and property. Security personnel may be found in a variety of settings, including corporate offices, malls, hospitals, and other locations. These professionals are tasked with ensuring the safety of individuals and property under their supervision.
Provocation is a situation in which an individual engages in actions or makes statements that are intended to provoke or incite another person. This may include insults, threats, and other forms of verbal or physical aggression.
A reaction to a stimulus is referred to as a response. This may include a variety of physiological, emotional, and cognitive changes. In terms of behavior, a response is the way in which an individual responds to a particular situation. The response to verbal provocation by a security officer may differ based on the situation and the level of provocation.
A security officer is not justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone. This is due to the fact that the use of force is only allowed when it is reasonable and necessary to prevent harm to oneself or others. When verbal provocation occurs, a security officer should attempt to defuse the situation verbally before resorting to the use of force.
Furthermore, if a security officer uses force in response to verbal provocation, they may face legal consequences, including charges of assault or battery. As a result, it is recommended that security personnel receive training on conflict resolution and effective communication to deal with potentially difficult situations.
You can learn more about security officers at: https://brainly.com/question/28326176
#SPJ11
After a robbery, what is the purpose of conducting a neighborhood canvass?
to look for hiding suspects
to identify and interview witnesses
to check for footprints or tire tracks
to find stolen items
Answer:
b
Explanation:
if it's for the entire neighborhood, it being witnesses would make sense.
Compare the means for each sample size (5 birds, 15 birds, and 50 birds) within each group of survivors and nonsurvivors. Are the means in smaller samples different from the means in larger samples
To compare the means for each sample size within the groups of survivors and non-survivors, you need to follow these steps:
Calculate the mean for each sample size within the survivor and non-survivor groups separately. This involves adding up the values and dividing by the sample size (5, 15, or 50). Once you have the means for each sample size in both groups, compare the means within each group. Observe any differences between the means of smaller samples (5 birds) and larger samples (15 and 50 birds).
Analyze the results to determine if the means in smaller samples are different from the means in larger samples. Smaller samples might have more variability, leading to differences in means. On the other hand, larger samples usually provide a more accurate estimate of the population mean, as they are less influenced by outliers.
In conclusion, comparing the means within each group will help you determine if there are any significant differences between smaller and larger sample sizes. Keep in mind that larger samples generally provide more reliable results due to decreased variability.
To know more about Calculating Mean visit-
brainly.com/question/15526777
#SPJ11
Opioid Epidemic Response: Place yourself in the role of the leader of substance abuse treatment for a state health agency (e.g., Louisiana Department of Health, Office of Behavioral Health). You have been tasked to design a response to the growing crisis in the state of your choice. At minimum, you must:
a. Tell me the state you are using for this response
b. Find some data to support the need for your intervention(s) you describe
i. Be able to describe your target problem population (who uses opioids in your
state)
ii. Relate your target population to national statistics
c. Evaluate programs already in operation that look promising for your target population
d. Describe your top priority intervention to begin to respond to this crisis
e. Estimate the cost of your intervention
REAL ANSWERS ONLY!!!!
NO LINKS!!!!
According to the CDC, Louisiana had the 10th highest rate of drug overdose deaths in the United States in 2020.
How to explain the informationThe target population for my intervention is individuals who are currently using opioids in Louisiana.
According to the CDC, an estimated 721,000 people in Louisiana used opioids in 2020. The opioid crisis is a national problem. In 2020, there were over 93,000 drug overdose deaths in the United States, and over 70% of those deaths involved opioids.
There are a number of existing programs in Louisiana that are designed to address the opioid crisis. These programs include:
The Louisiana State Opioid Response (LaSOR) Program, which provides funding for prevention, treatment, and recovery services for individuals with or at risk for opioid use disorder.
The Louisiana Opioid Crisis Response Fund, which provides funding for community-based organizations that are working to address the opioid crisis.
My top priority intervention is to expand access to evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder. This includes increasing the number of treatment providers, expanding insurance coverage for treatment, and reducing the stigma associated with addiction.
The estimated cost of expanding access to MAT in Louisiana is $50 million per year. This cost would be offset by the savings in healthcare costs.
Learn more about epidemics on
https://brainly.com/question/24222732
#SPJ1
what are the laws/regulations affecting gm foods in the united states?
Answer:
The regulation of genetically modified (GM) foods in the United States is overseen by several government agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Here are some of the key laws and regulations affecting GM foods in the United States:
FDA regulation: The FDA regulates GM foods as "foods" under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). GM foods are subject to the same safety requirements as other foods, including pre-market review by the FDA to ensure that they are safe to eat.
USDA regulation: The USDA regulates GM crops under the Plant Protection Act. GM crops that are intended to be grown in the United States must undergo a review process to ensure that they are not harmful to other plants or to the environment.
EPA regulation: The EPA regulates GM crops that are engineered to produce pesticides or other chemicals under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).
Coordinated Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology: In 1986, the White House issued the Coordinated Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology, which established a framework for regulating GM foods and other biotechnology products in the United States. The framework outlines the roles of the FDA, EPA, and USDA in regulating GM foods and other biotechnology products.
Labeling requirements: In 2016, the USDA established a mandatory labeling requirement for GM foods sold in the United States. The requirement, which went into effect in 2020, requires food manufacturers to disclose the presence of GM ingredients on their product labels.
It's worth noting that the regulation of GM foods in the United States is a complex and evolving issue, and there is ongoing debate over the adequacy of current regulations. Some advocacy groups and consumer organizations have called for stricter regulation of GM foods, while others argue that current regulations are sufficient to ensure their safety.
Answer:
The laws and regulations affecting genetically modified foods in
the United States are governed by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The USDA regulates the production and labeling of GM foods, while the EPA oversees their environmental impacts. The FDA is responsible for ensuring that GM foods are safe to eat and properly labeled. Additionally, the National Organic Program (NOP) regulates the use of GM foods in organic products.
Explanation:
Essential Questions: How do interest groups/lobbyists support the legislative process? Does the role that interest groups play represent what the founder
envisioned for the rights to free speech, assembly & petition or a hi-jacking of the legislative process?
Answer:
assembly & petition
Explanation:
Mica is an employee of Natural Gas Company and a member of a union of company employees. Under federal law, Mica and other union members have the right to
Answer:
a. Bargain collectively with their employer through their representative.
Explanation:
As an employee of the company and a member of the union of the company's employees, Mica has certain rights that prioritize his interests over that of the company. It also ensures that he, along with the others, have the right to oppose any mistreatment by the company.
Under federal law, Mica and his other union members have the right to bargain with their employer through their representatives. This is their right under the federal law, which not even the Natural Gas Company can ignore or declare void or baseless.
Thus, the correct answer is option a.
the document used to ask the u.s. supreme court to hear a case is called:
The document used to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear a case is called a Writ of Certiorari.
A Writ of Certiorari is a legal document that parties submit to the U.S. Supreme Court, requesting the Court to review and decide on a case from a lower court.
When a party believes that a lower court's decision contains significant legal errors, they can petition the Supreme Court with a writ of certiorari.
However, the Supreme Court has discretion over which cases it chooses to hear. It typically accepts cases that present important constitutional questions, involve conflicting decisions among lower courts, or address significant issues of national concern.
For more such questions on Supreme Court, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/30490295
#SPJ11
IS LAW LAW? AND IF LAW IS LAW WHAT WILL ITS SIGNIFICANCE BE ON
AGRICBUSINESS AND ETHICS?"
Yes law is law. The importance of law in agriculture is that it serves as a guideline for labour laws, immigration laws, international trade, FSSAI regulation, environmental issues, organisational issues, investment issues, and so on. The importance of law in ethics is to uphold the honour and dignity of the legal sphere.
Agribusiness is an important industry that includes all aspects of agriculture, from basic farming to productive resources, agricultural commodities, and facilitative services. Land laws, labour laws, intellectual property laws, international trade laws, food safety, and environmental laws are just a few of the concerns that entities functioning in the sphere contend with.
Both ethics and law address issues of right and evil and promote social cooperation. Through legislation, society's ethical principles become law, and we frequently link obeying the law with being ethically correct.
Learn more about law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30149053
#SPJ4
Video Question: What noise sounds at the end of a segment?
The kind of noise that sounds at the end of the segment is called an external noise.
What is an external noise?External noise is noise that happens outside of the listener's environment. The hum of a loud fan is an example of external noise that inhibits the listener from hearing the message.
External noise is noise that originates outside of the device or circuit. There are three major sources of outside noise.
The atmosphere,Extraterrestrial and otherArtificial noise.Learn more about external noise:
https://brainly.com/question/1931701
#SPJ1
2) Madison is not having a good day. She is enrolled at Katherine Gibbs College and
just learned that it would be closing its doors for good. Days later, Madison also
discovered that the college's degree programs were not accredited, meaning the credits
she had earned would not transfer. The only silver lining for Madison is that she now
qualities for loan forgiveness due to a closed college or university. Which Cabinet
department should she contact?
The Finance Cabinet department should be contacted by Madisson with a hope that she will get a loan forgiveness due to a closed college or university.
What is a loan forgiveness?A loan forgiveness is when the loan program forgives the remaining balance on your Direct Loans after some monthly payments under a qualifying repayment plan.
Therefore, the Finance Cabinet department is most likely able to get the loan forgiveness done.
Read more about loan forgiveness
brainly.com/question/16724065
what is an example of a federal law that combats organized crime?
Answer:
An example of a federal law that combats organized crime is the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO Act). Enacted in 1970, the RICO Act provides a legal framework to prosecute and impose severe penalties on individuals and groups involved in organized criminal activities. It allows federal authorities to target not only the individuals directly engaged in criminal acts but also the entire enterprise or organization associated with the illegal activities. Under the RICO Act, individuals can be charged with racketeering offenses if they are found to have engaged in a pattern of criminal behavior within an organized structure, such as drug trafficking, money laundering, bribery, or extortion. The RICO Act has been instrumental in dismantling and prosecuting various organized crime syndicates operating in the United States.
Explanation:
Define the Office of Civil Rights, and its responsibility as it relates to HIPAA.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is responsible for administering and enforcing these standards, in concert with its enforcement of the Privacy Rule, and may conduct complaint investigations and compliance reviews.
Should a Loss Prevention Officer be able to put his hands on and hand-cuff a child (5-13) to protect store property?
It is not appropriate for a Loss Prevention Officer to physically restrain or handcuff a child (5-13) to protect store property, as it should only be used in situations where there is an imminent threat to safety.
Who is a Loss Prevention Officer?A Loss Prevention Officer is an employee of a business who is responsible for preventing theft and other losses within the store.
A Loss Prevention Officer should not physically restrain or handcuff a child (aged 5-13) to protect store property. The use of physical force or restraints should only be used in situations where there is a clear and imminent threat to the safety of the public or the officer, and where it is necessary to prevent harm.
The use of force on a child should be a last resort and must be proportionate to the situation. Additionally, many jurisdictions have laws and regulations in place that prohibit the use of physical force or restraints on minors, except in extreme cases of danger.
Learn more about Loss Prevention Officer on:
https://brainly.com/question/30214543
#SPJ1
offense generally punishable by less than one year in jail and/or a fine
An offense generally punishable by less than one year in jail and/or a fine is a misdemeanor.
A misdemeanor is a type of criminal offense that is generally considered less serious than a felony. Misdemeanors are typically punishable by less than one year in jail and/or a fine. Examples of misdemeanors include petty theft, disorderly conduct, and minor drug offenses.
In contrast, a felony is a more serious criminal offense that is punishable by more than one year in prison. Examples of felonies include murder and robbery.
The distinction between misdemeanors and felonies is important because it determines the severity of the punishment for the crime. Misdemeanors generally carry lighter penalties, while felonies can result in long prison sentences or even the death penalty in some jurisdictions.
The complete question is:
An offense generally punishable by less than one year in jail and/or a fine is a _________
To know more about criminal offense, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/11112199#
#SPJ11
Some oppose the “ticking time bomb" argument as a justification for torture because _____.
Answer: In the post 9/11 environment society has been consumed by the question of whether torture is acceptable under extreme circumstances. The “ticking bomb” metaphor was regularly employed by various figures in the US as an argument to justify the use of torture in interrogations during the term of the Bush Administration. It is an argument that has been used to justify torture in a set of very extreme and detailed circumstances. This paper will argue that the “ticking bomb” metaphor does not provide a convincing argument to justify the use of torture under extreme circumstances. First, definitions of torture and the “ticking bomb” metaphor will be provided. Second, this essay will discuss the use of torture by the US in the War on Terror. Third, the arguments for the use of torture under extreme circumstances, and the flaws of allowing torture under extreme circumstances will be addressed.
Explanation:
any act by which severe pain suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity (United Nations 1997).
Torture is prohibited in any circumstance under a variety of international laws, conventions, and norms. It is spelt out in not only the UN Convention against Torture, but also the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the law of armed conflicts, and the Geneva Conventions (Ip 2009: 36). The prohibition of torture is further enshrined in domestic laws of many of the countries who have ratified these treaties. However, the “ticking bomb” metaphor is used to justify torture in certain extreme situations. The concept of the “ticking bomb” was first conceptualised in a fiction novel written by Jean Larteguy in 1960 (Kovarovic 2010: 254). It describes a scenario whereby the torture of a suspect is considered necessary to obtain information to prevent a future catastrophic event from occurring (Kovarovic 2010: 254). The scenario is usually described as one where terrorists have planned an attack that is going to occur very soon and a large number of people will be killed unless the authorities obtain critical information from the source they have captured (Ip 2009: 40). It is essentially torture that has been sanctioned by the state in exceptional circumstances (Bufacchi and Arrigo 2006: 354). Torture is still considered to be wrong in these circumstances, but it is viewed as a necessary or lesser evil (Ip 2009: 40). Proponents of the “ticking bomb” scenario argue that “torture may be wrong…but mass murder is worse, so the lesser evil must be tolerated to prevent the greater one” (Roth 2005: 197).
Which law provides legal recourse to people who purchase animals from pet dealers which are later found to have a disease or defect?.
The law that is being asked about here is the Pet Purchase Protection Law, also known as the "Puppy Lemon Law". It is a purchaser protection law that was enacted to provide legal recourse to people who bought animals from dealers that were later found to have disease or defect.
This purchaser protection legislations are currently in place in 22 U.S. states for the exact reason that their names suggest, and that is to safeguard the pet owner.
A typical Pet Purchaser Protection Act gives the fur parents a right of redress if they purchase an animal with a disease or defect from the seller while also requiring the seller to make specific disclosures regarding the animal that is being put on the market.
Discover why owning a pet from the pound or Animal Rescue League has many advantages: https://brainly.com/question/11899645
#SPJ4
ALAP
What is law really
Proposal committee consideration, debate, and executive action are all related to
a. Federalism
b. How a bill becomes a law (statute) in our American government system.
c. Judicial Review.
d. All choices.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
in 2011, the top 25 percent of income earners in the u.s. (by the size of their taxable incomes) paid about __________ percent of the total federal income taxes.
In 2011, the top 25 percent of income earners in the U.S. paid approximately 86 percent of the total federal income taxes.
According to data from the Tax Policy Center, the top 25 percent of income earners in the U.S. paid about 86 percent of the total federal income taxes in 2011. Specifically, those taxpayers with taxable incomes of $66,193 or higher were considered to be in the top 25 percent of earners and paid an average effective tax rate of 17.9 percent. Meanwhile, the bottom 50 percent of income earners paid just 2.4 percent of the total federal income taxes in 2011, with an average effective tax rate of just 2.6 percent. This disparity in tax burden has been a topic of debate and political discourse for many years, with some arguing that the wealthy should pay more in taxes to help fund government programs and reduce income inequality, while others argue that a lower tax burden on the wealthy is necessary to encourage investment and economic growth.
To know more about federal income visit :
https://brainly.com/question/2986643
#SPJ11
.For the current year, Jennifer has self-employment net income of $50,000 before any Keogh deduction and no other earned income for the year. The total amount of self- employment tax related to Jennifer's earnings was $7,064. What is the maximum amount Jennifer may deduct for contributions to her Keogh plan for the year?
The maximum amount Jennifer may deduct for contributions to her Keogh plan for the year is $10,000.
The maximum amount Jennifer may deduct for contributions to her Keogh plan for the year depends on her net self-employment income and the applicable contribution limits.
For self-employed individuals, the maximum deductible contribution to a Keogh plan is generally calculated as a percentage of their net self-employment income. As of 2021, the contribution limit is 20% of the net self-employment income, up to a maximum of $58,000.
In Jennifer's case, if her net self-employment income is $50,000, she can calculate her maximum deductible contribution by multiplying her net self-employment income by the contribution percentage.
$50,000 x 20% = $10,000
Therefore, the maximum amount Jennifer may deduct for contributions to her Keogh plan for the year is $10,000.
Learn more about contribution limits.
https://brainly.com/question/32559785
#SPJ11
When you appeal the verdict of a trial court, what does the appellate court review?.
Answer:
The appellate court reviews the case that you are asking for an appeal on. Then they decide if to allow the appeal or say no to the appeal.
Explanation:
Pls mark Brainliest with the crown
Facts: Officers wanted to search Dollree Mapp's house, but she said no because they did not have a warrant. They were looking for a suspected bomber. Eventually, the police forced their way in. They did not find a bomber, but they did find a trunk of obscene pictures in the basement. Ms. Mapp was arrested and convicted for possession of obscenity. She appealed.
Question for the court: Can you be convicted on the basis of illegally obtained evidence? Decision: No. The court held that evidence seized without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions both in Federal and now State courts. This is called the Exclusionary Rule. Issue: Can the Exclusionary Rule cause a criminal to go free? Explain below in 2-4 sentences.
Answer:
they didn't have a warrant so they shouldn't have forced there way in. Also they cannot be arrested
Explanation:
hoped this helped sry if wrong lol
How can you be beneficial to others
Answer:
I think by helping them in what they love most
being there for them always as ur mom thus