Answer:
you should not say that this is against brainly.com rulles/guid lines/hounder code. this is flagged and please do not do this again.Thanks for being a team player!
Explanation:
You hear a commercial state that scientific research has proven the effectiveness of a new medication, so it must be effective. True or false?
Which of the following is a safe place to pass another vehicle on a two-lane country road?
Answer:
i dont see any attachment add sum and ill come back
Explanation:
t see any attachment add sum and ill come back
Name the 3 Branches of Government and give a one sentence summary of what role they play in the
legal system
Answer:
legislative makes laws, executive enforces laws, judicial interprets laws
Answer: - Legislative
- Judicial
- Executive
Explanation:
Legislative:
- made up of the House and Senate, known as congress.
- Makes all laws, declares war.
- regulates interstate and foreign commerce and controls taxing
and spending policies.
Judicial:
- The federal courts and judges that interprets laws made by the
legislative branch and enforced by the executive branch.
Executive:
- carries out and enforces laws.
- Includes the President, Vice President, the Cabinet, and
Executive Departments
If you were a Supreme Court Justice hearing a case involving legality of the death penalty, the issue mostly likely at hand
would be
the First Amendment.
O the Fifth Amendment.
the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
the right to privacy.
In a case regarding the legitimacy of the death penalty, the Fifth Amendment would most certainly be the subject of discussion if I were a Supreme Court justice.
Does the death penalty fall under the Fifth Amendment's protections?According to the Fifth Amendment, a grand jury must present an indictment or presentment before a person can be held accountable for a crime that carries the death penalty or other severe penalties It is prohibited to prosecute or punish someone more than once for the same offense .
Why should the death penalty be legalized?2,000,000 US residents, according to Time Magazine, have reportedly been victims of crimes ranging from murder to assault. Criminals would become irresponsible and fearless without the death sentence, committing crimes with greater frequency.
To know more abourt Supreme Court Justice visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11929760
#SPJ1
Explain the major factors that go into how judges make decisions in their cases.
The major factors that go into how judges make decisions in their cases. are
"direct influences," which include things like legal and political experiences."indirect and distant impacts," which include things like broad legal and political.What is a Judge?Generally, A judge is an individual who presides over the proceedings that take place in a court of law, either on their own or as a member of a panel of judges.
The judge will listen to all of the witnesses as well as any additional evidence that may be provided by the prosecution or the defense. On the basis of the evidence that has been provided as well as in compliance with the law, the judge will make a determination as to whether or not the accused individual is guilty. In the event that the accused is found guilty, the court will subsequently impose the appropriate penalty.
Read more about judge
https://brainly.com/question/1059156
#SPJ1
What is another name for the national government?
Answer:
Explanation:
National Government is just the government of a single country
Answer:
federal government is the answer
Danzel purchased a new stove for $500 and placed it in service in his rental house in March 2017. He elected not to claim the special depreciation allowance, and Danzel's adjusted basis including depreciation on the stove at the time of sale was $192. Danzel sold the rental house, including the stove, in October 2019. Under what property section of the Internal Revenue Code will the sale of the stove fall?
Section 179.
Section 1245.
Section 1250.
Section 1255. xxxxx
Answer:
Danzel purchased a new stove for $500 and placed it in service in his rental house in March 2017. He elected not to claim the special depreciation allowance, and Danzel's adjusted basis including depreciation on the stove at the time of sale was $192. Danzel sold the rental house, including the stove, in October 2019. Under what property section of the Internal Revenue Code will the sale of the stove fall?
Section 179.
Section 1245.
Section 1250.
Section 1255. xxxxx
A criminal statute, which is so vague or indefinite, that the courts have felt they are considered to be "void for vagueness," because they are essentially:
If a criminal statute is so ambiguous or imprecise that it fails to provide people fair notice of what behaviour is prohibited, it is ruled "void for vagueness" by the courts and violates their right to due process.
it difficult for people to understand what conduct may lead to criminal liability. The principle of "void for vagueness" is a legal concept that addresses this issue.When a criminal statute is so poorly defined or lacks clarity to the extent that it fails to provide individuals with fair notice of what behavior is prohibited, it may be deemed "void for vagueness." This means that the law is considered unconstitutional and unenforceable because it violates the due process rights of individuals.
The principle of fair notice is an essential aspect of the legal system. Laws should be written in a way
lean more about ambiguous here :
https://brainly.com/question/31273453
#SPJ11
The article is by Richard Wright, entitled, "Ethics of Jim Crow."
Read the article and answer the questions attached to the last page of the text. You do not need answer all the questions. You do not need to restate the question in your answer. Your response should be at least 250 words. You do not need to respond to a classmate.
The Ethics of Jim Crow
A time in "Jim Crow era" American history from the late 19th to the mid-20th century was marked by systematic racial segregation and prejudice against African Americans.
Strict racial segregation laws, policies, and practises were imposed during this time, mainly in the Southern states of the US. These laws limited the rights and possibilities of African Americans by segregating them in public places such as schools, public transportation, and housing, among other aspects of daily life.Jim Crow's morals were fiercely debated and harshly criticised. The system was largely based on racism, upholding the notion that white people are inherently superior to African Americans. The segregationist policies and practises promoted a dehumanising and oppressive atmosphere by denying African Americans their fundamental human rights, equality, and dignity.
Learn more about Jim Crow era here:
https://brainly.com/question/15927367
#SPJ11
Which of the following takes place
after Primary Season ends?
A. The General Election
B. Declaration Announcement
C. Candidates Drop Out
Answer: I believe my friend that it is A
Explanation:
which best describes why china introduced the one-child policy?to eliminate population growthto reverse population growthto increase population growthto slow population growthbritish officialsmembers of the dietthe allied governmentsus army officers
China introduced the one-child policy to slow population growth. In the 1970s, China faced an exponential increase in population, which was seen as a threat to the country's economic development and social stability.
The government feared that a rapidly growing population would lead to food and resource shortages, high unemployment rates, and increased poverty levels.
To combat these issues, the one-child policy was implemented in 1979 to limit each family to only one child. The policy was enforced through fines, penalties, and forced abortions or sterilizations.
While the policy did slow population growth, it also had unintended consequences, such as a gender imbalance and an aging population. The policy was officially ended in 2015.
To know more about population growth visit:
https://brainly.com/question/18415071
#SPJ11
What does “unanimous” mean? Why do you think jury verdicts must be unanimous?
One technique to guarantee that a defendant won't be found guilty unless the prosecution has proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt is to have.
What is court?A court is any person or institution with the jurisdiction to arbitrate legal disputes between parties and administer justice in civil, criminal, and administrative affairs in conformity with the rule of law. A court, often known as a court of law, is a person or group of people with the legal jurisdiction to hear and settle disputes in civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military issues.
A unanimous jury verdict. To successfully convict a criminal defendant, prosecutors must persuade the jury that there is no possibility of reasonable doubt in their minds.
Therefore, By, “unanimous” means being of one thought; receiving the assent and agreement of all. indisputably.
Learn more about the court here:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ2
what is Newton law of motion
in determining whether to exercise personal jurisdiction over an out of state defendant based on online activity, courts will
In determining whether to exercise personal jurisdiction over an out of state defendant based on online activity, courts will typically apply the "Zippo sliding scale" test. This test was established in the case of Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc., and it is used to determine the level of interactivity and commercial nature of the defendant's online activity in relation to the forum state.
The Zippo sliding scale test includes three categories:
1. Active websites: These are websites that conduct business over the internet, such as online stores. Courts are more likely to exercise personal jurisdiction over defendants with active websites, as they have a greater level of interactivity and commercial nature with the forum state.
2. Interactive websites: These are websites that allow for some level of interaction between the defendant and the forum state, such as online forums or social media platforms. Courts may exercise personal jurisdiction over defendants with interactive websites, depending on the level of interactivity and commercial nature.
3. Passive websites: These are websites that simply provide information and do not allow for any interaction between the defendant and the forum state. Courts are less likely to exercise personal jurisdiction over defendants with passive websites, as they have a lower level of interactivity and commercial nature with the forum state.
Overall, courts will consider the level of interactivity and commercial nature of the defendant's online activity in relation to the forum state when determining whether to exercise personal jurisdiction.
To know more about Personal jurisdiction:
https://brainly.com/question/30695765
#SPJ11
Which of the following sanctions are awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party be in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed? Group of answer choices Compensatory damages Liquidation damages Punitive damages Incidental damages Exemplary damages
The sanction that is awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed is compensatory damages.
Compensatory damages are the payment given by one party to another to compensate for any losses or damages that may have occurred as a result of a breach of contract. Compensatory damages are the most common form of damages awarded for a breach of contract. The main objective of compensatory damages is to ensure that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed. This means that the damages awarded should compensate the aggrieved party for any losses they have suffered as a result of the breach of contract.
Compensatory damages can be awarded for various types of losses, including direct damages, incidental damages, and consequential damages. The damages awarded will vary depending on the type of loss suffered and the terms of the contract. In order to recover compensatory damages, the aggrieved party must prove that they have suffered a loss as a result of the breach of contract and that the loss is measurable in monetary terms.
In conclusion, compensatory damages are awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed.
Learn more about compensatory damages: https://brainly.com/question/4395083
#SPJ11
Explain what do adults suggest about teenagers' perception of physical (1x2)(2) exercise.
the clayton act was enacted in 1914 to strengthen the antitrust laws under the sherman act. true/false
The statement that 'the Clayton Act was enacted in 1914 to strengthen the antitrust laws under the Sherman Act' is true. It complemented the Sherman Act by providing a more comprehensive framework to address anticompetitive practices.
The Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 is a United States antitrust law that regulates competition and monopolies. It is named after Senator William Alden Smith and Representative Henry De Lamar Clayton, who were the act's authors. It bans monopolistic behaviour, price fixing, and exclusive dealings and ties. It made illegal a variety of business activities that the Supreme Court had previously stated were not covered by the Sherman Antitrust Act.
The Clayton Act also stipulated that businesses could not acquire the stock of competing corporations if doing so would result in reduced competition. It stipulated that if a company's merger or acquisition activity would "substantially lessen competition," the government had the authority to halt the activity.
Hence, the Clayton Act aimed to prevent specific business practices that could potentially lead to a reduction in competition, such as price discrimination, exclusive dealing agreements, and corporate mergers that could lessen competition. Thus, the statement is true.
Learn more about Clayton Antitrust Act:
https://brainly.com/question/14684775
#SPJ11
LAW:
What does the Bad Frog case stand for? Do you agree with any of the
courts' decisions? How would you have ruled and why if you were the
judge in this case?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Bad Frog case is a legal case that involves the First Amendment rights of a beer company. The court's decisions vary, but it primarily stands for the protection of free speech. However, if I were the judge, I would have ruled in favor of the beer company, as I believe in upholding freedom of expression.
which of the following best describes a custodial interview?
The scenerio that best describes a custodial interview is Interview obtained when individual is in custody.
What is a custodial interview?Custodial interview can be regarded as a type of interviews for school custodians , this kind of interview is been set up to determine the attitude as well as motivation of the interviewee.
Therefore, Interview obtained when individual is in custody describe
Custodial interview.
Learn more about custodial interview at:
https://brainly.com/question/24448358
What major legislation encouraged thousands of immigrants to settle land in the western united states?.
The primary piece of legislation that attracted tens of thousands of immigrants to buy land in the Western United States was the Homestead Act.
What all acts were introduced to set the Western region of the US?It was said that the act was carried out or passed in order to promote economic progress and the expansion of the American West.
It should be noted that the Homestead Act of 1862, which Congress is said to have passed, granted 160 acres of federal land to anyone who would agree to farm the land.
Due to the 160 acres of land that the Homestead Act gave settlers, it is known to have promoted significant migration to the West.
The Homestead Act was therefore a key piece of legislation that encouraged numerous immigrants to buy land in the western United States.
Therefore, the primary piece of legislation that attracted tens of thousands of immigrants to buy land in the Western United States was the Homestead Act.
For more information on Homestead Act, refer to the following:
https://brainly.com/question/10390487
#SPJ4
URGENT 40 POINTS
The Sixth Amendment guarantees individuals the right to a trial that is public, speedy, and held in the jurisdiction where the alleged crime took place. Recently, a woman was arrested on suspicion of shoplifting from a local gas station. Her trial is set for two weeks from today. Instead of waiting for trial, the suspect is thinking of taking a plea bargain. What does this mean?
A.
She will ask for her trial to be moved up a week.
B.
She will ask that her trial be held somewhere else.
C.
She will ask that her trial be held in private.
D.
She will admit guilt in exchange for a lesser sentence.
Answer:
I believe it is D
Explanation:
a plea bargain is "an agreement between a defendant and a prosecutor, in which the defendant agrees to plead guilty or "no contest" (nolo contendere) in exchange for an agreement by the prosecutor to drop one or more charges, reduce a charge to a less serious offense, or recommend to the judge a specific sentence ..."
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
Why is it difficult for a bill to become a law?
A: There are not many ideas being sent to the lawmakers.
B: The committees do not get their work completed in time for approval.
C: The president vetoes most bills that are sent for approval.
D: The process includes a system of checks and balances by both executive and
legislative
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Our system has checks and balances between the branches of Government. These checks and balances maintain distributed power but they can make bills becoming laws a much more difficult process.
Which of the following has original jurisdiction over cases involving disputes between two or more states?
U.S. Circuit Court
U.S. District Court
U.S. Supreme Court
US. Intermediate Appellate Court
The court which has original jurisdiction over cases involving controversies between two or further countries is the US Supreme Court.
Original jurisdiction is the capacity of a court to hear a case for the first time. It can be distinguished from appellate governance, which is a court's capability to consider a case that a lower court has preliminarily heard and determined.
The Supreme Court's governance — its power to hear cases is established under Composition III, Section II of the Constitution. Certain cases, similar as suits involving two or further countries and/ or cases involving ministers and other public ministers, fall under the Court's original governance.
To learn more on original jurisdiction, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13961368
#SPJ4
What is a crime against property?
Arson.
Burglary.
Extortion.
Theft.
Vandalism.
Juvenile vandalism penalties.
Burglary.
The Visiting Forces Act 1952.
1. looking at the way people do their work, what equipment or tools they use, and where improvements can be made to ensure safety
2. documenting all accidents or injuries to identify patterns
3. identifying safety and health issues in the workplace by conducting a thorough walk-through and inspecting every physical attribute
data analysis
risk mapping
job hazard analysis
The first step is to look at the way people do their work and identify what equipment or tools they use. This will help identify any potential hazards or risks associated with the work. The second step involves documenting all accidents or injuries to identify patterns. This will help identify areas where improvements can be made to prevent future accidents or injuries. The third step is to identify safety and health issues in the workplace by conducting a thorough walk-through and inspecting every physical attribute. This will help identify any potential hazards or risks associated with the workplace.
Once these steps have been completed, data analysis can be conducted to identify any patterns or trends that may be contributing to safety issues. This may involve risk mapping to identify areas where the risk of accidents or injuries is highest. Additionally, job hazard analysis can be conducted to identify specific tasks or activities that may be more hazardous than others. ensuring safety in the workplace involves a thorough and systematic approach that involves identifying potential hazards and risks, documenting accidents and injuries, and conducting data analysis to identify patterns and trends. By taking these steps, employers can create a safer and healthier workplace for their employees.
to know about hazard analysis visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30641432
#SPJ11
what is not considered a casualty event, regardless of whether a casualty loss or gain will be allowed?
Answer:
Generally, you may deduct casualty and theft losses relating to your home, household items, and vehicles on your federal income tax return if the loss is caused by a federally declared disaster declared by the President. You may not deduct casualty and theft losses covered by insurance, unless you file a timely claim for reimbursement and you reduce the loss by the amount of any reimbursement or expected reimbursement.
Explanation:
Which expression could be used to determine the area of the triangle? A triangle has a base of 2 and three-fourths and height of StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction. One-half + 2 and three-fourths + StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction (2 and three-fourths) (StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction) One-half (2 and three-fourths) (StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction) One-half (2) (three-fourths) (StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction)
Answer:
Explanation:
Which expression could be used to determine the area of the triangle? A triangle has a base of 2 and three-fourths and height of StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction. One-half + 2 and three-fourths + StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction (2 and three-fourths) (StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction) One-half (2 and three-fourths) (StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction) One-half (2) (three-fourths) (StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction)
Answer:
103/39
Explanation:
The test which focuses on volitional incapacity is the:
A)M'Naghten test.
B)"right and wrong" test.
C)Product rule.
D)"Substantial Capacity" test.
Answer:
Explanation:
The test that focuses on volitional incapacity is the "Substantial Capacity" test.
The "Substantial Capacity" test is a legal criterion used to determine a defendant's mental state during the commission of a crime. It evaluates whether the defendant had the ability to appreciate the wrongfulness of their actions or adhere to the law due to a mental impairment or illness.
Unlike the M'Naghten test, which assesses cognitive incapacity, the Substantial Capacity test emphasizes volitional incapacity, meaning the inability to control one's behavior. This test takes into account whether the defendant's mental condition affected their capacity to act in accordance with the law, even if they understood the nature and consequences of their actions.
Learn more about nature click here:
https://brainly.in/question/12023118
#SPJ11
Penny had carelessly left marbles on the steps of her house. When Bijou came to visit, she broke her leg by slipping on those marbles and severely damaged her spine. While in the hospital recovering from her fall, her body being weak from all the antibiotics, readily contracted a viral infection. Under these circumstances, Penny is most likely to be liable:______
a. only for the damage to Bijou resulting from her fall.
b. only for Bijou's viral infection.
c. for injuries sustained by Bijou and also for the viral infection.
d. for neither problems because Bijou should have been careful.