Answers
Answer:
correct answer is option a...
Related Questions
What are the categories of controlled substances and how are they different from one another?
Answers
Controlled substances are drugs and other substances that are regulated by the government due to their potential for abuse and dependence, as well as their medical benefits. There are five categories, or schedules, of controlled substances in the United States, as defined by the Controlled Substances Act:
Schedule I: This category includes drugs that have no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. Examples include heroin, LSD, and marijuana.
Schedule II: This category includes drugs that have a high potential for abuse and dependence, but also have some accepted medical uses. Examples include oxycodone, fentanyl, and Adderall.
Schedule III: This category includes drugs that have a moderate to low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include codeine and anabolic steroids.
Schedule IV: This category includes drugs that have a low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include Xanax and Ambien.
Schedule V: This category includes drugs that have a low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include cough medicines that contain codeine.
The categories are differentiated based on the substance's medical uses, potential for abuse, and likelihood of causing dependence. The stricter regulations on Schedule I substances reflect the fact that they are considered to have a higher potential for harm and abuse, while Schedule V substances are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse and dependence. The schedules are used to guide the regulation of these substances, including their manufacture, distribution, and prescription.
1. Pilihan ganda1 minute1 ptQ. According to the rule of law, a government leader:Pilihan jawabanHas absolute authority to make decisionsIs excluded from "We the People"Must follow the laws like everyone elseHas more rights than ordinary citizens
Answers
Option 1 is Correct. In accordance with the rule of law, a government official: Has unrestricted decision-making power.
An Absolute Monarchy and Absolutism are closely related in that the reigning person has "absolute" power and is unchallenged by any legal, electoral, or other means. In a dictatorship, the lives of the populace are completely under the authority of the ruling party.
A single individual—typically a king or queen—holds total, autocratic power in an absolute monarchy. Under absolute monarchy, the throne normally passes via a reigning family, with the succession of power being hereditary. A political notion known as "sovereignty" designates absolute power or supreme authority. In a monarchy, the "sovereign" holds absolute power.
Learn more about government Visit: brainly.com/question/28320231
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
According to the rule of law, a government leader:
1. Has absolute authority to make decisions
2. Is excluded from "We the People"
3. Must follow the laws like everyone else
4. Has more rights than ordinary citizens
the bail decision is made at what stage of the court process?
Answers
The decision to grant or deny bail is made by the judge at various stages of the court process.Bail decision is a legal term used to refer to the decision made by a court of law to release an arrested person from custody while awaiting trial, with or without imposing any bail conditions.
The bail decision can be made at the initial appearance, or arraignment, in a criminal case when the defendant is brought before the court for the first time to hear the charges against them. At this stage, the judge will determine if bail is appropriate and set the amount of bail if it is granted. If the defendant is not granted bail at the initial appearance, a subsequent bail hearing may be scheduled.
The bail decision can also be made during a preliminary hearing, where the judge will determine whether there is sufficient evidence to hold the defendant for trial. If the defendant is held for trial, the judge may decide to grant bail or continue the defendant's remand in custody until the trial begins.Bail decisions may also be made during the trial process. If the defendant is convicted, the judge may order them to be taken into custody immediately or allow them to remain free on bail pending sentencing. If the defendant is acquitted, they are released from custody.
To know more about Court Bail visit-
brainly.com/question/29246898
#SPJ11
Joe, who lives in State A, files a lawsuit in federal court against Bill, who lives in State B. Joe's lawsuit will be dismissed by the judge unless the damages sought are more than
Answers
Joe, who lives in State Joe's lawsuit will be dismissed by the judge unless the damages sought are more than $75,000. Thus, option (b) is correct.
This is due to the requirement that the damages at issue must exceed $75,000 in order for a plaintiff to proceed with a federal court lawsuit based on diversity of citizenship, which is the circumstance in which the plaintiff and defendant are citizens of different states.
Even though there is complete diversity of citizenship, the plaintiff cannot bring a lawsuit in federal court if the sum sought is $75,000 or less. It is crucial to remember that various courts may have varying jurisdictional restrictions, therefore claimants should confirm the jurisdictional prerequisites of the particular court where they intend to submit their complaint.
Therefore, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on lawsuit, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ1
illegally obtaining computerized information through the path of direct access is usually taken by
Answers
Illegally obtaining computerized information through the path of direct access is usually taken by hackers or cybercriminals.
When individuals or groups engage in unauthorized activities to gain access to computer systems or networks, it is commonly referred to as hacking. Hackers use various techniques and methods to bypass security measures and gain direct access to computerized information. This may involve exploiting vulnerabilities in software, networks, or systems, utilizing malware or malicious software, or employing social engineering tactics to trick individuals into revealing sensitive information. Once inside, hackers can gather, manipulate, or steal data for various purposes, such as financial gain, espionage, or sabotage. It is important to note that these activities are illegal and punishable under the law in most jurisdictions. Governments, organizations, and individuals employ cybersecurity measures to safeguard their computerized information and protect against such unauthorized access attempts.
Learn more about Illegally here:
https://brainly.com/question/32412722?
#SPJ11
the plaintiff brought his car to a mechanic for a tune-up. during the tune-up, the mechanic removed the fuse for the brake lights and inadvertently failed to replace it, causing the lights to stop working. as the plaintiff was driving his car home from the mechanic, he was involved in an accident. the plaintiff, seeing a friend walking along the road, slammed on his brakes to give the friend a ride. the defendant, who was driving the car behind the plaintiff, hit the plaintiff. the plaintiff sustained severe whiplash from the accident and has sued the defendant and the mechanic. at trial, the jury determined that the plaintiff's damages were $10,000 and that the defendant was 50% at fault, the mechanic was 25% at fault, and the plaintiff was 25% at fault. the jurisdiction recognizes pure several liability and partial comparative negligence. how much can the plaintiff collect from the defendant?
Answers
Answer:
100,000USD
Explanation:
Journalist’s Notes:
Within the span of three months, several homes on one side of town have been broken into during the day. No one is ever home at the time, and numerous high value items have been stolen. Additionally, three local businesses have been broken into at night after closing. Cash was stolen from the safes in two of the businesses. The third business is a hardware store and several expensive tools were stolen. During this time period, two bicycles and one all-terrain vehicle were also stolen while left outside unattended; it is unclear if these thefts were committed by the same offender(s) breaking into homes and businesses.
Finally, two disturbing incidents occurred in the midst of these crimes.
First, a man with a gun forcefully pushed a man who was stopped at a red light off of his motorcycle. The gunman then hopped on the motorcycle and sped off.
Second, two women got into an altercation in the mall parking lot when one woman accused the other of stealing her parking spot. The angry woman parked her truck behind the other woman’s car, blocking it in. She then proceeded to kick and hit the other woman for several minutes before grabbing a baseball bat from her truck and hitting the other woman in the back with it. She then smashed the windshield and drove off.
Answers
Answer:
Description of Criminal Act: A man with a gun forcefully pushed a man who was stopped at a red light off of his motorcycle. The gunman then hopped on the motorcycle and sped off.
Type of Crime: Robbery
Property or Violent Crime:
Violent (The man had a "gun", this could be a threat of harm. Making the other man not to fight the gunman for his bike back. The gunman then forcefully pulled the man off his motorcycle.
Explanation:
In relation to the Minimum Necessary standard and meeting state law disclosure requirements, is the following statement true or false?
"Where disclosures are required by Arizona state statutes, the Privacy Rule's minimum necessary standard does not apply, because the law requiring the disclosure will establish the limits on what should be disclosed."
Answers
The Minimum Necessary standard applies to all disclosures of protected health information, regardless of whether it is required by state law or not, but the law requiring the disclosure will establish the limits on what should be disclosed. Thus Statement is false.
The statement that "Where disclosures are required by Arizona state statutes, the Privacy Rule's minimum necessary standard does not apply, because the law requiring the disclosure will establish the limits on what should be disclosed" is not accurate.
The Minimum Necessary standard is a requirement under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule, which applies to all disclosures of protected health information (PHI) regardless of whether it is required by state law or not. The law requiring the disclosure will establish the limits on what should be disclosed but it does not negate the Minimum Necessary standard.
The Minimum Necessary standard requires that covered entities make a reasonable effort to limit PHI disclosures to the minimum necessary to accomplish the intended purpose. This means that even if a state law requires a disclosure, the covered entity must still make sure that only the minimum necessary information is disclosed.
Learn more about Arizona state:
https://brainly.com/question/28329794
#SPJ4
august vollmer's most daring innovation was the idea of a(n):
Answers
federalist 39 if the plan of the convention, therefore, be found to depart from the republican character, its advocates must abandon it as no longer defensible
Answers
In Federalist 39, Alexander Hamilton argues that the proposed Constitution is a republican form of government.
What does Federalist 39 say ?Hamilton acknowledges that the Constitution does not create a pure democracy, in which all laws are made directly by the people. However, he argues that this is not necessary for a government to be considered a republic. He points out that even in a pure democracy, the people must delegate some of their power to representatives.
Hamilton concludes that the proposed Constitution is a republican form of government and that its advocates should not abandon it simply because it is not a pure democracy. He defines a republic as "a government in which the scheme of representation takes place."
Find out more on the Federalist papers at https://brainly.com/question/233891
#SPJ4
Comment about this post.
What do copyright laws protect?
When discussing this topic, we first need to be clear about the definition of copyright law. Copyright law in the United States is governed by a federal statute known as the Copyright Act of 1976. Copyright law prevents unauthorized copying of an author's work. However, only copying of the work is prohibited - anyone can copy the ideas contained in work (Bitlaw, 2022).
U.S. copyright law provides copyright owners with the exclusive right to make copies of works or sound recordings, to prepare derivative works based on the results, to distribute copies of works or sound recordings to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership or by rental, lease or loan, etc. Copyright law protects the right of an author, artist, or other creators who create a work to control when and how their work is copied and distributed and to prevent others from misappropriating that work without permission. Copyright protects someone's ability to profit from their creative work, but this protection is not absolute. Anyone who attempts to copy, distribute, display, perform, or make derivative works of a copyrighted work without the copyright owner's permission violates copyright, regardless of whether the work is registered with the U.S. Copyright Office or carries a copyright notice. Copyright law protects the fundamental rights that citizens should enjoy and gives them a sense of stability, which are very important (Kroeck, 2016).
Answers
This post provides a concise and accurate overview of copyright laws and their purpose.
It correctly explains that copyright laws protect the rights of creators by preventing unauthorized copying and distribution of their work. It also mentions the exclusive rights granted to copyright owners and highlights the importance of permission and authorization for copying, distributing, and creating derivative works.
The post acknowledges that copyright protection is not absolute and mentions the role of the U.S. Copyright Office in registration. Furthermore, it emphasizes the significance of copyright laws in providing stability and protecting the creative rights of individuals.
Thus, the post effectively communicates the key aspects of copyright laws and their role in safeguarding intellectual property.
Learn more about copyright laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/22089522
#SPJ1
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
Answers
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa
Explain and summarize the process the police must follow when it comes to providing a person their Miranda Warnings.
Answers
Why did the Dodd-Frank Act amend the Investment Advisers Act?
Answers
It was amended with the intent to:
1. To promote the financial stability of the US
2. To improve the accountability and transparency of the fin'l system
3. End "TOO BIG TO FAIL"
4. End bailouts (Chrysler, GM, & Goldman Sachs)
5. To protect consumers from abusive financial services practices.
proof these moderators are not so good at their jobs
Answers
What does grave injustice mean?
Answers
Answer:
to treat someone or something in an unfair way they did her a grave ijustice is by not allowing her to file complaint
Will a mistake in value of the subject of the contract allow a contract to be rescinded?
Answers
Answer:
Whether a mistake in the value of the subject of a contract will allow the contract to be rescinded depends on the specific circumstances of the case and the applicable law in the jurisdiction. Generally, a mistake in the value of the subject of the contract is not sufficient on its own to allow a contract to be rescinded.
In order for a contract to be rescinded based on a mistake, the mistake must be material, meaning that it must have a significant effect on the performance of the contract. In addition, the mistake must be mutual, meaning that both parties to the contract must have been mistaken about the same material fact. Finally, the mistake must not have been caused by the fault of either party.
If these requirements are met, the affected party may have grounds to seek rescission of the contract or reformation of the contract to reflect the true value of the subject matter. However, it is important to note that the legal requirements for rescission or reformation of a contract based on a mistake can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific facts of the case. It is therefore advisable to seek the advice of a qualified attorney in the relevant jurisdiction.
Post-9/11 gi bill housing and kicker payments now require monthly enrollment verification. Would you like to submit yours via text? please reply yes or no.
Answers
As a result of recent changes in the law, you must now verify your enrollment status every month to receive your Post-9/11 GI Bill housing allowance and kicker payments. This is to ensure that you are eligible for the benefits and that you are receiving the correct amount. One of the easiest ways to verify your enrollment is by texting us. If you would like to use this option, please reply with YES.
About PaymentsPayment is the voluntary surrender of money or an equivalent or something of value by one party to another in exchange for goods or services provided by them or to fulfill a legal obligation.
Learn More About Payments at https://brainly.com/question/29475683
#SPJ11
a police officer spotted a middle-aged male sitting on a bench in a public park. the officer did not recognize the man, but was aware that the park was frequently used as a site for illegal drug transactions. the officer approached the man who remained seated on the bench. the officer asked the man for his name. when the man refused, the officer arrested him. under state law, it is a misdemeanor for an individual to intentionally refuse to give his name to a police officer who, having lawfully detained the person, has requested it. although a search of the man revealed that he did not possess any drugs, he was charged and convicted of violating the law and fined. the man appealed, challenging his conviction as a violation of his rights under the federal constitution. should the appellate court rule in favor of the man?
Answers
In this case, it appears that the man was arrested and convicted for refusing to provide his name to the police officer, which is a misdemeanor offense under state law.
The appellate court would need to examine whether the man's Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure were violated during the encounter with the police officer. They would assess whether the officer had reasonable suspicion or probable cause to detain and request the man's name, and whether the subsequent arrest and conviction were lawful.
In general, courts consider various factors to determine the reasonableness of a search or seizure, including the specific circumstances, the officer's knowledge, and the individual's behavior. If the court determines that the officer lacked reasonable suspicion or probable cause to detain the man and request his name, they may rule in favor of the man and overturn his conviction, potentially on the grounds that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated.
However, it is essential to consult with a legal professional or refer to relevant case law and statutes to understand the specific legal principles and standards that would be applied in this situation. Legal outcomes can vary based on the jurisdiction and the specific details of the case.
To know more about state law here
https://brainly.com/question/15218412
#SPJ4
The crime scene investigation team arrives at a car crash scene and finds that both the drivers are taken away in an ambulance and there are no eyewitnesses. The investigation team needs to determine how fast the cars were going. Which action should crime scene investigators take?
Answers
Answer:
they should look for tire marks,skids, abd look at the damage on both cars to determine
a demand for the relief sought." upon receiving the complaint, the driver objected that the pedestrian’s request for punitive damages was made without the court’s permission and thus must be stricken from the complaint based on the state a statute. must the federal court adhere to the state a rule and require the pedestrian to obtain its permission to seek punitive damages?"
Answers
The federal court may not necessarily adhere to the state rule and require the pedestrian to obtain permission to seek punitive damages. It depends on whether the state rule conflicts with federal law or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The answer to whether the federal court must adhere to the state rule and require the pedestrian to obtain permission to seek punitive damages depends on the specific jurisdiction and applicable laws. Generally, in federal court, the rules and procedures of the federal system govern the case. However, state law may still be considered if it does not conflict with federal law or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
In this scenario, if the state rule requiring permission to seek punitive damages conflicts with the federal rules, the federal court may not require the pedestrian to obtain permission. The court will likely apply the federal rules and procedures for determining whether punitive damages are warranted.
It is important to consult legal experts and review the specific jurisdiction's laws, rules, and precedents to determine how the federal court would handle this situation. The interaction between state and federal law can be complex, and it is essential to understand the relevant legal framework to determine the appropriate course of action.
Learn more about federal law
https://brainly.com/question/30040989
#SPJ11
1. what is the canada-china foreign investment promotion and protection agreement about? what are the main objectives of this treaty?
2. what is the canada-costa rica foreign investment promotion and _______.
Answers
Bilateral treaty promoting and protecting foreign investment between Canada and China, ensuring predictability, fair treatment, and dispute resolution are the main objectives of this treaty.
A bilateral agreement between Canada and China called the Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (FIPA) aims to encourage and safeguard foreign investment between the two nations. This treaty's main goals are to increase predictability and security for investors, ensure fairness and equity, ease the flow of capital, and create a process for resolving investment disputes.
A bilateral agreement called the Canada-Costa Rica Foreign Investment Promotion Agreement aims to encourage and facilitate foreign investment between Canada and Costa Rica. Its primary goals include fostering an environment that is conducive to investment, making sure that investments are protected and treated fairly, and setting up mechanisms for dispute resolution.
The agreement aims to promote economic cooperation, improve market access and give investors from both nations legal certainty and predictability. The provisions on non discrimination, expropriation compensation, and free fund transfers are among the rights and responsibilities of investors that are outlined in this document. The agreement aims to deepen economic ties and promote investment flows that benefit both Canada and Costa Rica.
Learn more about bilateral agreement at:
brainly.com/question/28214309
#SPJ4
What would happen if you do not obey the law and then not obey a SWAT officer
Answers
Disobeying a law order of a police officer carries higher penalties to those who refuse to follow orders lawfully issued by an officer of the law. It’s a second-degree misdemeanor, meaning its punishable by up to 60 days in jail, six months of probation and/ or a $500 fine.
Explanation:
The city of Chicago was having issues with people defacing local buses and trains. To stop the defacing the city passes a law banning the sale of spray paint within city limits. This type of law is known as _
Answers
The city of Chicago was having issues with people defacing local buses and trains. To stop the defacing the city passes a law banning the sale of spray paint within city limits. This type of law is known as mala prohibita.
If you deface something, you've blemished or disfigured it in some way. for instance, graffiti can deface a statue. To deface something means to harm it or simply mess up its look. And every now and then it is each: Throwing a cup of espresso on a treasured painting ruins the face of the portray, so we are saying it is been defaced.
Deface means to destruct or destroy the look. The term can be used with admiration for people or files. Defacing a human is a crook offense. Defacing also approaches making illegible by using injuring the face of a written file.
Deface method to destruct or ruin the appearance of. The time period may be used with respect to individuals or documents. Defacing a human is a crook offense. Defacing additionally way making illegible via injuring the face of a written document.
Learn more about defacing here https://brainly.com/question/10975188
#SPJ4
give examples of how state expansion and centralization led to resistance from groups on a local level.
Answers
State centralization and growth sparked local opposition from a variety of social, political, and business sectors as slave rebellion posed a threat to the Americas' ruling elite.
What do you mean by Expansion?The process of expanding involves increasing in size, quantity, or amount.
The establishment of new trading ports by the Europeans in Africa and Asia was advantageous for the kings and merchants participating in the emerging global trade networks. By implementing restrictive or isolationist trade policies, some Asian states aimed to reduce the disruptive effects of long-distance commerce on their economies and cultures.
(For instance, Tokugawa Shogunate or Ming China)
European nations like the Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch, French, and British built new marine empires as a result of political, religious, and economic rivalry.
Therefore, Slave rebellion posed a threat to the Americas' ruling elite.
Learn more about Expansion, here;
https://brainly.com/question/29774506
#SPJ2
Elisa bought 5 bracelets for a total of $25.95. If the bracelets were the same cost, about how much did each bracelet cost? $4.00 $125.00 $5.19 $5.00
Answers
Answer:
they would cost 5.19
Explanation:
5•5=25
.19•5=.95
together they add up to 5.19
Is the presidents power found in Article 2 or the Oath of Office
Answers
Answer:
It would be found in Article 2
which of the following would best support the assertion that hierarchies based on racial clasification emerged after 1500 ce to maintain thw authority of new elite groups in the amweicas
Answers
The idea that racial classifications developed after 1500 CE to support the dominance of new aristocratic groups in the Americas is supported by the use of terminology like mestizo, mulatto, and creole.
What is racial classification?Human beings are divided into groups that are typically considered as separate within a given civilization based on shared physical or social characteristics, or on race. During the 1500s, the phrase gained widespread acceptance and was applied to a variety of social groups, including those that were distinguished by close blood ties. The phrase started to be used to describe bodily characteristics (phenotypical qualities) by the 17th century, and later, national associations. According to contemporary science, race is a social construct, a label assigned in accordance with socially constructed standards.Race does not necessarily represent anything physical or biological, although being partially based on physical similarities between populations.Racism, which holds that people can be divided depending on their race, is based on the idea of race.
The idea that racial classifications developed after 1500 CE to support the dominance of new aristocratic groups in the Americas is supported by the use of terminology like mestizo, mulatto, and creole.
To know more about racial classifications, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23875164
#SPJ4
In RA9184 or the Government Procurement Act, the term Government Underspending refers to a scenario when a certain agency was not able to spend all of its allotted budget for a certain year leading to a low "Budget Utilization". If a budget is unused, the government therefore was not able to perform its duty of providing the country with good services and can lead to low infrastructure project, low employment and corruption. Underspending can happen for one of the following reasons: a. Failed Bidding where bidders and suppliers either are reluctant to bid to the project. b. Poor planning by the Procurement Agency and Bidding Committee. c. Intentional corruption to allot the money for bonuses rather than for projects. This is the reason why senators are proposing to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and just resort to a negotiated bidding where the Government will eliminate the competitive bidding and will just give the rights of doing the projects to big corporations. In your opinion, a. What will be the pros and cons of the proposed Law? b. Do you agree with the proposal? Explain your answer.
Answers
No, I disagree with the proposal to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and favor big corporations for projects.
The proposed law to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and resort to negotiated bidding has potential pros and cons. Pros include faster project implementation, involvement of big corporations, and reduced corruption.
However, there are cons such as limited competition, potential for inflated costs, decreased transparency, and favoring big corporations over small businesses.
I do not agree with the proposal as it may undermine fair competition, transparency, and accountability, while potentially excluding smaller businesses and increasing the risk of corruption in procurement processes.
Preserving the Bidding Process promotes fairness, efficiency, and integrity in government procurement.
Learn more about Procurement Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/30019470
#SPJ4
Case 4.3, Taylor v. Baseball Club of Seattle, L.P., involved a Mariners fan, Delinda Middleton Taylor, who was injured by a baseball that entered the stands during team warm-ups. The issue in the case was a. whether the risk of injury from an errant baseball was foreseeable to a reasonable person with Taylor's familiarity with baseball. b. whether the ball was thrown into the stands intentionally. c. whether Taylor suffered a legally recognizable injury. d. false imprisonment.
Answers
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Taylor v Baseball club of seattle case was filed by Taylor against Baseball club of Seattle for being negligent. The baseball club in their defence argued that Taylor was quite familiar with the game and the fact that there is a chance that a ball can hit a spectator.