Selina didn't use the distributive property correctly. Where did she go wrong? Explain your thinking.​

The sum of interior angles of a tray that is of pentagon shape is 540°

Given,

There is a tray which is of pentagon shape.

We have to find the sum of interior angles of the tray.

We have to find the sum of interior angles of pentagon.

That is,

Sum of interior angle of polygon formula = (n - 2) × 180°

Where, n is the number of sides in a polygon.

Here,

Pentagon has 5 sides.

Then,

Sum of interior angles = (5 - 2) × 180° = 3 × 180° = 540°

That is,

The sum of interior angles of a tray that is of pentagon shape is 540°

Learn more about interior angles of polygons here;

https://brainly.com/question/26522820

#SPJ1

The question is incomplete. Completed question is given below;

Suppose is Jeanine is building a tray for a floral table centerpiece in the shape of a pentagon. The sum of the interior angles of the tray will be

Answer:

3 terms we have constant ,Y and X terms

The joint relative Frequency of students who do not like to run and enjoy swimming, based on the given two-way frequency table, is approximately 62.16%.

The joint relative frequency of students who do not like to run and enjoy swimming, we need to find the intersection of the row and column corresponding to those categories in the two-way frequency table.

Given the following information from the table:

Likes running: 28

Does not like running: 46

Column totals: 74

Enjoys swimming: 62

Enjoys cycling: 90

Row totals: 110

The joint relative frequency, we divide the number of students who do not like running and enjoy swimming by the total number of students:

Joint relative frequency = (Number of students who do not like running and enjoy swimming) / (Total number of students)

From the table, the number of students who do not like running and enjoy swimming is given as 46.

Total number of students is given as 74.

Joint relative frequency = 46 / 74

Calculating this value, we find that the joint relative frequency is approximately 0.6216, which is equivalent to 62.16%.

Therefore, the joint relative frequency of students who do not like to run and enjoy swimming is approximately 62.16%.

In conclusion, the joint relative frequency of students who do not like to run and enjoy swimming, based on the given two-way frequency table, is approximately 62.16%.

To know more about Frequency .

https://brainly.com/question/28821602

#SPJ8

Answer:

3,952 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the sine function since you need to find the hypotenuse but know the opposite side of the angle, since sine is equal to opposite/hypotenuse.

sin8°=\(\frac{550}{c}\)

csin8°=550

c=550/sin8°

c= 3,952

The midpoint of the line segment is the average of the respective coordinates.

So the x-value of the midpoint if the average of the two individual x-coordinates.

    (-3.5 + 4)/2 = 0.5/2 = 0.25

And the y-value of the midpoint if the average of the two individual y-coordinates.

    (2 + (-2.5))/2 = -0.5/2 = -0.25

So, the midpoint is (0.25, -0.25) or (1/4, -1/4) or "C".

Answer:

Read explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Whatever is underlined copy in:

58+3x-13=90, so 3x + 45 = 90

Then 3x=45 and x =15

m<MNQ = 3x -13 = 3(15)-13

                           = 45-13

                           =32

The length of the rectangle is twice its width. If its perimeter is 7 1/3 cm, its length will be 22/9 cm, and the width is 11/9 cm.

Let's assume the width of the rectangle is "b" cm.

According to the given information, the length of the rectangle is twice its width, so the length would be "2b" cm.

The formula for the perimeter of a rectangle is given by:

Perimeter = 2 * (length + width)

Substituting the given perimeter value, we have:

7 1/3 cm = 2 * (2b + b)

To simplify the calculation, let's convert 7 1/3 to an improper fraction:

7 1/3 = (3*7 + 1)/3 = 22/3

Rewriting the equation:

22/3 = 2 * (3b)

Simplifying further:

22/3 = 6b

To solve for "b," we can divide both sides by 6:

b = (22/3) / 6 = 22/18 = 11/9 cm

Therefore, the width of the rectangle is 11/9 cm.

To find the length, we can substitute the width back into the equation:

Length = 2b = 2 * (11/9) = 22/9 cm

So, the length of the rectangle is 22/9 cm, and the width is 11/9 cm.

For more information on the Perimeter of the Rectangle, click:

https://brainly.com/question/13757874

Answer:

x=−4,y=2

Step-by-step explanation:

We reject the Null Hypothesis and conclude that the individual is likely to have embezzled.

Given a Goodness of Fit test is a statistical test used to assess how likely it is that an observed data set fits a theoretical distribution, in this case Benford's Law. This test should be applied in this situation, as it can be used to determine if a data set follows the expected pattern of the theoretical distribution. The Null Hypothesis is that the observed data set follows Benford's Law, while the Alternative Hypothesis is that the observed data set does not follow Benford's Law. The P-Value for this test is 0.0116, which suggests that there is a 1.16% chance of observing a distribution this far from the expected one if the Null Hypothesis is true. Therefore, we reject the Null Hypothesis and conclude that the individual is likely to have embezzled. Based on this evidence, law enforcement officials should pursue the case further.  

Learn more about hypothesis here :

https://brainly.com/question/29576929

#SPJ4

Answer:

3y+6=30

-6  

3y=24

divde by 3

y=8

:)

A study based on a population sample that includes 2000 respondents would be the most reliable out of the given options.

In statistical analysis, the reliability of a study depends on the representativeness and size of the sample.

A larger sample size generally provides more reliable results as it reduces the sampling error and increases the precision of the estimates.

Given that the population contains 20,000 people, we need to consider which number of respondents would yield the most reliable study.

Option A: 200 respondents

This represents only 1% of the population.

While it is better than having just 2 respondents, it may not be sufficient to accurately capture the characteristics of the entire population.

Option B: 20 respondents

This represents only 0.1% of the population.

With such a small sample size, the study would likely suffer from a high sampling error and may not provide reliable results.

Option C: 2000 respondents

This represents 10% of the population.

While it is a larger sample size compared to the previous options, it still only captures a fraction of the population.

The study may provide reasonably reliable results, but there is room for potential sampling error.

Option D: 2 respondents

This represents an extremely small sample size, accounting for only 0.01% of the population.

With such a small sample, the study would be highly susceptible to sampling bias and would likely yield unreliable results.

Based on the options provided, option C with 2000 respondents would be the most reliable study.

Although it does not include the entire population, a sample size of 2000 respondents provides a larger representation of the population and reduces the potential for sampling error.

However, it's important to note that the reliability of a study depends not only on sample size but also on the sampling method, data collection techniques, and other factors that ensure representativeness.

For similar question on population sample.

https://brainly.com/question/27859177  

#SPJ8

Answer:

32.99

Step-by-step explanation:

59.98(45%)=26.99

59.98-26.99=32.99

Answer:

$32.99, the discount took off $26.99.

Step-by-step explanation:

Good luck!

Answer:

265 feet to the nearest foot.

Step-by-step explanation:

sin 3 = a / 5072

a = 5072 sin 3

= 265.4479 feet

Answer: .

Step-by-step explanation:.

Note that the coordinates of the point A' after rotating 90 degrees clockwise about the point (0,1) are (3, -4). (Option B)

To rotate a point 90 degrees  clockwise about a given point,we can follow these steps -

Translate the coordinates   of the given point so that the center of rotation is at the origin.   In this case,we subtract the coordinates   of the center (0,1) from the coordinates of point A (5,4) to get (-5, 3).

Perform the rotation by swapping the x and y coordinates and changing the sign of the   new x coordinate. In this case,we  swap the x and y coordinates of (-5, 3)   to  get (3, -5).

Translate the coordinates back to their original position   by adding the coordinates of the center (0,1)  to the result from step 2. In   this case, we add (0,1) to (3, -5) to get (3, -4).

Therefore, the coordinates   of the point A' after rotating 90 degrees clockwise about the point (0,1) are (3, -4).

Learn more about coordinates at:

https://brainly.com/question/17206319

#SPJ1

Answer: 4/21

Step-by-step explanation: 1 1/3 =4/3 3 1/2x2= 7

Answer:

first second and last are real

others are complex numbers

Using matrices the simultaneous equation is solved to get x = 3 and y = 5

This method required finding determinants in three occasions then dividing

The given equation

\(\left[\begin{array}{cc}3&2&\\1&1\\\end{array}\right] \left[\begin{array}{c}x\\y\\\end{array}\right]= \left[\begin{array}{c}19\\8\\\end{array}\right]\)

the determinant is

\(\left[\begin{array}{cc}3&2&\\1&1\\\end{array}\right]\)

3 * 1 - 2 * 1 = 3 - 2 = 1

Solving for x

determinant while replacing x values

\(\left[\begin{array}{cc}19&2&\\8&1\\\end{array}\right]\)

19 * 1 - 2 * 8 = 19 - 16 = 3

solving for x = 3/1 = 3

Solving for y

determinant while replacing y values

\(\left[\begin{array}{cc}3&19&\\1&8\\\end{array}\right]\)

3 * 8 - 19 * 1 = 24 - 19 = 5

solving for y = 5/1 = 5

Learn more about simultaneous equations at:

https://brainly.com/question/148035

#SPJ1

The scale factor is 7:2, the perimeter ratio is 7:2, and the area ratio is 49:4.

Scale Factor:

The scale factor represents the ratio of corresponding lengths in similar figures.

In this case, the scale factor is given as 7:2.

Perimeter Ratio:

The perimeter ratio of two similar figures is equal to the ratio of their corresponding perimeters.

Since the scale factor is 7:2, the perimeter ratio will also be 7:2.

This means that the ratio of the perimeters of the first figure to the second figure is 7:2.

Area Ratio:

The area ratio of two similar figures is equal to the square of the scale factor. In this case, the scale factor is 7:2.

Thus, the area ratio will be (7/2)² = 49/4.

This indicates that the ratio of the areas of the first figure to the second figure is 49:4.

Learn more about the Scale images here:

brainly.com/question/13194929

#SPJ1

Answer:

Sorry for being late it is Fewer than 14.05 Hope this helps :D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer is "Fewer than 14.05"

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The proposed negation is not correct. A possible corect negation woulld be: There is an irrational number and, a rational number whose product is rational.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the given information above:

STATEMENT: "The product of ANY irrational number and ANY rational number is irrational".

From the above statement, the word "ANY" is very vital. Let assume we choose an element x from a particular set X of irrational numbers, as well as an element y from the set Y of a rational number, therefore, the statement has a use case and applies to every x and y element. Thus, in an effective mathematical way, the statement typically implies "for all x in set X and for all y in set Y, the product x*y is irrational.

However; from the negation of the "for all" statement is "there exists" (any text in discrete arithmetic will assist you to become fully aware of this fact). Any ramifications in the statement is likewise negated, i.e; if the statement infers that the resulted product of x and y is irrational, at that point the negation(invalidation) infers that the item isn't irrational. For example, it is rational. At the point when we set up every one of these facts, we get:

"There exist an element x in the set X, in addition to that; there exists an element y in set Y;  x*y is rational".

If we express that into the option given; the right option is:

"There exist an irrational number and a rational number whose product is rational"

\(\tan 195^{\circ}\\\\=\tan\left(3 \times 90^{\circ} - 75^{\circ} \right)\\\\=\cot 75^{\circ}\\\\=\left(\tan 75^{\circ} \right)^{-1}\\\\= \textbf{[}\tan \left(30^{\circ} + 45^{\circ}\right) \right \textbf{]}^{-1}\\\\=\left(\dfrac{\tan 30^{\circ} +\tan 45^{\circ}}{1- \tan 45^{\circ} \cdot \tan 30^{\circ}} \right)^{-1}\\\\\\=\left( \dfrac{\dfrac 1{\sqrt 3}+1}{1- \dfrac 1{\sqrt 3}} \right)^{-1}\\\\\\=\left( \dfrac{\sqrt 3+1}{\sqrt 3-1}\right)^{-1}\\\\\\=\dfrac{\sqrt 3-1}{\sqrt 3 +1}\\\)

\(=\dfrac{\left( \sqrt 3-1\right)^2}{\left( \sqrt 3+1\right)\left( \sqrt 3-1\right)}\\\\\\=\dfrac{3+1-2\sqrt 3}{3-1}\\\\\\=\dfrac{4-2\sqrt 3}{2}\\\\\\=2-\sqrt 3\)

Answer:

10

Step-by-step explanation:

-5 times -2= 10

Answer:

0.14

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question given above, the following data were obtained:

Grade A = 5

Grade B = 10

Grade C = 15

Grade D = 3

Grade F = 2

Sample space (S) = 35

Probability of getting grade A, P(A) =?

The probability that a student obtained a grade of A can be obtained as follow:

Probability of getting grade A, P(A) =

Event of A (nA) / Sample space, (nS)

P(A) = nA/nS

P(A) = 5/35

P(A) = 0.14

Thus, probability that a student obtained a grade of A is 0.14

The completely factoring form of 6a^2 - 15a + 6 is 3(2a - 1)(a - 2).

To completely factor the expression 6a^2 - 15a + 6, the first step is to check if there is a common factor among the coefficients (6, -15, and 6) and the terms (a^2, a, and 1).

In this case, we can see that the common factor among the coefficients is 3, so we can factor out 3:

3(2a^2 - 5a + 2)

Now we need to factor the quadratic expression inside the parentheses further. We are looking for two binomials that, when multiplied, give us 2a^2 - 5a + 2. The factors of 2a^2 are 2a and a, and the factors of 2 are 2 and 1. We need to find two numbers that multiply to give 2 and add up to -5.

The numbers -2 and -1 fit this criteria, so we can rewrite the expression as:

3(2a - 1)(a - 2)

Therefore, the completely factored form of 6a^2 - 15a + 6 is 3(2a - 1)(a - 2).

for similar questions on factoring.

https://brainly.com/question/28260513

#SPJ8

Answer:

The population mean load failures for the three etch times are all equal

Step-by-step explanation:

For an ANOVA F test, the null hypothesis always assumes that mean which is also the average value of the dependent variable which is continuously are the same/ there is no difference in the means. The alternative is to test against the null and it is always the opposite of the null hypothesis.

Answer:

4 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

f the circumference of the circular garden =63 yards

Circumference of a Circle =2πr=πd (d=diameter)

Therefore:

πd= 63

diameter of the circular garden =63/3.14=20 yards

If he digs at a rate of 5 yards per hour, the time required to dig across the garden will be:

20 yards/5 yard per hours = 4 hours

It will take him 4 hours to dig across the circular garden.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

x+9

Let x, be 4

4+9=13

given condition,

x+9<4x

4+9<4(4)

13<16

The answer is:

Work/explanation:

Our inequality is:

\(\sf{x+9 < 4x}\)

Flip it

\(\sf{4x > x+9}\)

Solve

\(\sf{4x-x > 9}\)

Combine like terms

\(\sf{3x > 9}\)

Divide each side by 3

\(\sf{x > 3}\)