Scientific theory involves only empirical evidence based upon conceptual structure.True False

The correct option is option D. His mom is the seller.

Licensees are required by Arkansas law to disclose personal interests before acting on their own behalf or on behalf of specific individuals with whom they have a personal relationship. In this case, Jose's mother is the house's seller, therefore he has a personal stake in the transaction. While drafting an offer, he must disclose this to his buyer client.

Option A has no bearing on Jose's personal relationship and hence does not necessitate disclosure. Option B implies that José is assisting a friend in writing an offer on the same house, but it does not imply a personal relationship that would necessitate disclosure. Option C implies that Jose's former college roommate may make an offer on the house, but it makes no mention of any personal tie between Jose and the roommate that would necessitate disclosure.

For such more question on Licensees:

https://brainly.com/question/30194464

#SPJ4

First: Crime Scene Tech

Black Lights

Black Powder

Fingerprints and Hair

Gotcha Now'

Second: Law Enforcement

Flashing Lights

Ending Lives

Racially Broken System.

Life Ending Choice

Split Second Reactions.

Always Criticized.

Answer: Copyright

Explanation:

Copyright category of IP Law that protects original works of authorship

- this extends to anything authored including literature, dramas, musicals, paintings, novels, songs, software, architecture, and movies!

hope this helps!

Answer:

Negotiation, mediation and arbitration - often called ADR or alternative dispute resolution- are the most well-known. ... The following processes describe ways to resolve disputes. Negotiation. Definition: Negotiation is the most basic means of settling differences.

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Taylor v Baseball club of seattle case was filed by Taylor against Baseball club of Seattle for being negligent. The baseball club in their defence argued that Taylor was quite familiar with the game and the fact that there is a chance that a ball can hit a spectator.

In contract law, the transfer of contractual rights from one party to another is called an assignment. The assignment typically occurs after the original contract has been formed between the two parties involved. The assignment of contractual rights allows for the transfer of those rights from one party to another, providing flexibility and opportunities for parties to reassign their rights and obligations as needed

The party who transfers the rights is known as the assignor. They are the original party to the contract who chooses to transfer their rights to another party. The assignor may have various reasons for making the assignment, such as wanting to delegate their obligations, receive payment, or simply transfer their rights to someone else.

The party who receives the rights is referred to as the assignee. They are the third party who accepts the assignment and becomes the new holder of the contractual rights. The assignee steps into the shoes of the assignor and gains the right to enforce the terms of the contract and receive any benefits or performance owed under the contract.

It's important to note that not all contracts are assignable. Some contracts may have specific provisions that prohibit or restrict assignments. Additionally, certain types of contracts, such as those involving personal services or contracts that would materially alter the obligations of the other party, may be non-assignable by their nature.

To know more about assignor

https://brainly.com/question/32319042

#SPJ11

Answer:

Amnesty International

Human Rights Watch

UN human rights council

Human rights first

Explanation:

I can count 1.
You can count 10.

Standard parole and/or probation conditions that typically must be satisfied for an offender to remain in the community include all of the above.

Probation and parole refer to privileges which enable an offender to avoid prison or to be released from prison after serving only a portion of their sentences. The objectives of probation and parole are the rehabilitation of offenders and their reintegration back into society while minimizing the possibility that they will commit a new offense. Probation may be granted by a judge as an alternative to imposing a jail sentence. Parole may be granted after an offender has served a portion of his or her prison sentence. Among the standard conditions for both probation and parole is that the offender report to the probation officer as directed, they do not engage in any future violations of the law and seek and maintain employment.

Learn more about Parole:

https://brainly.com/question/29659021

#SPJ4

Answer:

D. Reaching out.

Explanation:

Individuals in criminal justice careers need to be sure to avoid unethical behavior which might damage public trust. Public trust ensures community members feel safe reaching out to criminal justice agencies.

In the criminal justice system, when individuals such as prosecutors and defendants are trustworthy, sincere, morally upright and acts in a manner that benefits and adds significant value to the judicial process, they are said to be ethical in their career. Thus, this ethical behavior goes a long way in enhancing and enabling public trust, as well as building their confidence in the criminal justice system.

This ultimately implies that, a larger percentage of the members of the community would feel safe, confident, eager and enthusiastic to reach out to various criminal justice agencies when there is public trust.

Answer: 9 classes

Explanation: 1. Explosives 2. Gases 3. Flammable Liquids and Combustible Liquids 4. Flammable Solids and Spontaneously Combustible Materials 5. Oxidizers and Organic Peroxides 6. Toxic Materials and Infectious Substances 7. Radioactive Materials 8. Corrosive Materials 9. Miscellaneous Dangerous Goods

Answer:

Joe did the right thing by leaving a note with his name and number on it to take responsibility for the accident. It shows maturity and responsibility, and it is the ethical thing to do. Even though his parents may have been angry about the situation, leaving the scene of the accident without taking responsibility could have resulted in legal consequences and could have caused more problems in the future.

In this situation, Joe should communicate with the car owner and discuss how the dent can be fixed. He can offer to pay for the damages out of his own pocket, or suggest getting a few quotes from different body shops to compare prices. If the owner agrees to accept payment from Joe, he should get a written agreement or receipt of payment to avoid any legal disputes in the future.

Joe's parents should support him in taking responsibility for his actions and help him find a solution to the problem. They can work together with Joe to find a solution that works for everyone involved, and help him negotiate with the car owner to reach a fair resolution.

In general, situations like this can be solved through open communication and taking responsibility for one's actions. By communicating honestly and openly with the other party involved, it is often possible to find a solution that works for everyone.

If Joe didn't try to contact the owner of the car ever again, it could result in legal consequences. Leaving the scene of an accident without taking responsibility is a serious offense, and could result in criminal charges or a civil lawsuit. It is always best to take responsibility for one's actions and try to find a solution to the problem.

The authority which is responsible for conducting the votes and announcing results is the Electoral College.

The Electoral College is considered to be a process, not a place. So, here the Founding Fathers are said to have established it in the Constitution, which is between the election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of the certain qualified citizens.

However, the Electoral College tends to consist of a 538 electors. Where a majority of 270 electoral votes is required in order to elect the President. So, this authority is responsible for conducting the votes and announcing the results.

To learn more about the Electoral College here:

https://brainly.com/question/7954182

#SPJ4

Article III did not cover how the court system would be developed, so the First Congress created the Judiciary Act of 1789 to establish the federal Judiciary. The Judiciary Act of 1789 established the federal court system separate from individual state courts. It was one of the first acts of the First Congress.

Answer: free exercise clause

Explanation:

The Bill of Rights is made up of the first ten amendments in the Constitution of the United States. The Bill of Rights consist of the rights of every Americans.

According to The Free Exercise Clause, Americans have the right to practice any religion that they want. Under the Free Exercise Clause, the religious beliefs of the citizens are protected. Also, the government shouldn't support any religion or become involved with one is as not to bring about controversy.

The ultimate source of legislative power is where parliamentary sovereignty and constitutional supremacy diverge most. It is the legislature in parliamentary supremacy; it is a state's constitution in constitutional supremacy.

Hence, The ultimate source of legislative power is where parliamentary sovereignty and constitutional supremacy diverge most. It is the legislature in parliamentary supremacy; it is a state's constitution in constitutional supremacy.

To learn more about parliamentary sovereignty refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/14621416

#SPJ4

The process of planning research that must be followed when conducting legal research is

The goal and purpose of the study should be clearly stated. Depending on the goal of the investigation, choose the right sources to consult. Create precise research questions to direct the inquiry.

Create a methodical strategy outlining the actions to be performed when conducting the study.  Analyze the sources' value, dependability, and applicability. Organize the data you have gathered. Consider the study goal and research questions as you analyze and analyze the research findings.

Learn more about research, here:

https://brainly.com/question/18723483

#SPJ1

Answer:

Federal Law  

Explanation:

A criminal case involving the illegal acquisition of guns in Mexico and their sale to someone in California would typically be handled by a federal court, specifically the United States District Court for the district where the crime occurred.

The reason for this is that the crime falls under federal jurisdiction because it entails breaking both state and federal laws as well as crossing international and interstate borders.

Federal offences, such as the unlawful importation or exportation of firearms, fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal court system, as do other federal offences.

As a result, the matter would be heard and decided by a federal court.

For such more question on criminal:

https://brainly.com/question/740707

#SPJ11

1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that a) for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population. 2. The Founding Fathers ultimately chose to extend the slave trade for another b. 20 years.

The three-fifths compromise was struck in 1787 by members of the Constitutional Convention. It called for the census of three-fifths of a state's enslaved population in order to determine the number of Representatives each state would have in Congress.

It also detailed the principles for allocating federal direct taxation and the number of electoral votes allotted to each state. In other words, states that legalized slavery could count 60% of their enslaved people, who were not citizens and could not vote, in determining the state's political representation in the national government.

The three-fifths agreement was part of a package of perks that included a twenty-year moratorium on any prohibition on slavery inserted into the Constitution to persuade people to vote.

To know more about Three-fifths Compromise:

https://brainly.com/question/27878011

#SPJ4

Correct question:

1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that _____.

a) for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population

b) for every three slaves, five would be counted toward population

c) for every five slave owners, three slaves could be added to the total state population

d) for every three slave owners, five slaves could be added to the total state population

2. The Founding Fathers considered banning slavery in the Constitution, but instead chose to extend the slave trade for _____ years.

a) 100

b) 20

c) 10

d) 50

Answer:

Most police-citizen encounters do not include force.

Force is only used in certain situations.

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court in the federal court system of the United States.

The Supreme Court is the final arbiter of all cases and disputes originating under the US Constitution and other US laws. Supreme Court has final court of appeal jurisdiction over all federal court cases in the United States, as well as state court cases involving an argument of federal law.

As the ultimate authority of the law, the Supreme Court is tasked with assuring the American people of the commitment of equal justice under law, and thus serves as the Constitution's guardian and interpreter.

Learn more on Supreme Court -

https://brainly.com/question/14411708

#SPJ9

Answer:

He should get an assistant to ease him of some work .

The advice would be the only fields that Agent Suma is allowed to complete are the applicant's name and contact information. To preserve their privacy, the client must fill out the remaining fields.

What is clients?

The individual or customer who utilizes the services of a company, client, or organization is referred to as a “client.” The customer both uses the company's services and pays for them. The customer mostly purchases the company's services in accordance with her preferences and choices.

Suma, the agent, is responsible for completing the enrollment form on paper. Agent Suma is a client who needs help completing the form. However, there are numerous inquiries about personal and private information on the form.

As a result, the agent Suma only authorizes the entry of the name and a few other details but not all of them. The clients are adding details based on their personal perceptions rather than to assist others because anyone could abuse the information.

Hence, the significance of the clients is aforementioned.

Learn more about on clients, here:

https://brainly.com/question/17355548

#SPJ5

yayyyyyy congrates, good job hope you have a great day

Answer:

1) The Ombudsman may on a complaint by any aggrieved person, on a reference by the Government or the Provincial Assembly, or on a motion of the Supreme Court or the High Court made during the course of any proceedings before it or of his own motion, undertake any investigation into any allegation of maladministration on the part of any Agency or any of its officers or employees:

Provided that the Ombudsman shall not have any jurisdiction to investigate or inquire into any matters which:-

(a) are subjudice before a Court of competent jurisdiction on the date of the receipt of a complaint, reference or motion by him or

(b) relate to the external affairs of Pakistan or the relations or dealings of Pakistan with any foreign state or Government; or

(c) relate to, or are connected with, the defence of Pakistan or any part thereof, the Military, Naval and Air Forces of Pakistan, or the matters covered by the laws relating to those forces.

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in subsection (1), the Ombudsman shall not entertain for investigation any complaint by or on behalf of a public servant or functionary concerning any matters relating to the Agency in which he is, or has been, working, in respect of any personal grievance relating to his service therein.

(3) For carrying out the objectives of this Act and, in particular for ascertaining the root causes of corrupt practices and injustice, the Ombudsman may arrange for studies to be made or research to be conducted and may recommend appropriate steps for their eradication.

Functions

The law empowers the Ombudsman Punjab to entertain complaints against any department, commission or office of the Provincial Government or a statutory corporation or other institution established or controlled by the Provincial Government but does not include the High Court and the Courts working under the supervision of High Court and Provincial Assembly and its Secretariat.

Under section 9(1) of the Act the Ombudsman on a complaint of any aggrieved person, on a reference by the Government or the Provincial Assembly or on a motion of Supreme Court or the High Court or on his own motion (suo moto) can undertake any investigation into any allegation of ‘maladministration’ on the part of any agency or its officers or employees.

The Ombudsman, however, has no jurisdiction to investigate or enquire into matters which are (a) subjudice before a court of competent jurisdiction (b) relates to the external relations of Pakistan or connected with defence of Pakistan or Military, Naval and Air Force of Pakistan or the matters covered by the laws relating to these Forces. The Ombudsman also cannot entertain for investigation any complaint by or on behalf of a public servant or functionary concerning any matter relating to the agency in which the public servant has been or is working in respect of any personal grievance or relating to his service therein.

Powers

Ombudsman has the same powers as are vested in a Civil Court under the code of civil procedure for summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person; compelling the production of documents; receiving evidence on affidavits and issuing commission for examination of witnesses. The Ombudsman is vested with the powers to enter and search any premises and inspect any article, books of account and other documents; impound and seal such article. The Ombudsman has the same powers, mutatis mutandis, as the High Court has to punish any person for its contempt.

When a case is granted review in an appellate court, the parties submit written briefs presenting their arguments.

What is appellate court  ?

The American judicial system's appellate courts, also referred to as the court of appeals, are in charge of hearing and examining appeals from cases that have already been handled at the trial-level or in another lower court.

When a person or entity, such as a business, loses a case in a trial-level court or another lower court, they have the right to appeal to an appellate court to have the judgment reexamined. The lower decision might be overturned if the appeal has merit. Both both the state and federal levels, appellate courts are present but do not have juries. Appeals from matters that have already been heard and decided in lower courts are heard and reviewed by appellate courts.

Learn more about appellate court plan with the help of given link:-

https://brainly.com/question/20634957

#SPJ4

The likelihood of the court granting the motion for an extension in this scenario depends on various factors.

The court might not grant an extension if the attorney's justification of being too busy isn't compelling enough, particularly if the court was aware of the duties' due date beforehand.

Increased costs cited by the defendant in opposition to the extension could also work against the request. The delay's cause, its potential effects on the other party, and the interests of justice will all be taken into account by the court.

The court may be more likely to grant an extension if the lawyer can show that unforeseen circumstances led to the delay.

The court may also grant the request if it won't unfairly harm the defendant or significantly impair the objectives of justice.  

In the end, the judge's discretion will determine whether or not to consider the various circumstances and grant the motion for an extension of time.

To know more about a lawyer,

https://brainly.com/question/24718712

#SPJ1

The most public order offenses to enforce are felonies that violate public order. They are supported by either a horrible intent, such as the intention to kill, or a grave consequence, such as the death, serious injury, or destruction of property. Felons obtain the highest grade and can be punished in any way because they are the most serious crimes.

Yes, I do believe that the penalties for these crimes are adequate.

Yes, I agree that they should be more strictly enforced in order to deter criminality.

2. Because there is typically no justification for an arrest, prostitution is the public order violation that is least important to enforce.

No, They shouldn't, in my opinion, be less aggressively enforced because it's a criminal against.

No, I do not believe that they should be less strictly enforced simply because it is a crime against the body.

Public order offenses, as their name implies, are crimes against upholding the peace in the community. These crimes frequently entail acts of public violence, intimidation, or property destruction. The police are able to keep the peace by committing public order offenses.

Acts that go against the social norms of morality and acceptable behavior are considered crimes against the public order. Moral principles form the foundation of the generally accepted notions of good and wrong.

Therefore Some of the most common types of offenses against public order include those involving narcotics, prostitution, unruly behavior, public intoxication, and other offences involving alcohol.

Learn more about public order crimes from

https://brainly.com/question/6624074

#SPJ1