Answer:
meeting all the requirements to be allowed to do something
Which type of loan will use a HUD-1 in place of a Closing Disclosure?
Answer:
The HUD-1 Settlement Statement is a document that lists all charges and credits to the buyer and to the seller in a real estate settlement, or all the charges in a mortgage refinance. If you applied for a mortgage on or before October 3, 2015, or if you are applying for a reverse mortgage, you receive a HUD-1.
Reverse mortgages are the type of loan that typically uses the HUD-1 instead of Closing Disclosure.
This is because the HUD-1 allows for better organization of reverse mortgage terms, allowing everyone involved in the reverse mortgage to better understand their contractual obligations.
It is important to emphasize that the HUD-1 is a document where the terms, values and charges of a real estate contract are presented. As the HUD-1 is designed for use in real estate agreements, its use in reverse mortgages is extremely beneficial.
In relation to reverse mortgages we can state that:
These are mortgage loans;Allows the buyer to access the free value of the property.Allows the promotion of loans to older users.No monthly payment required.Based on this, we can conclude that because it is directly related to real estate loans, the HUD-1 is efficient in presenting and organizing the terms of a reverse mortgage.
You can find more information about this at the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/12935382?referrer=searchResults
Why is the government basically either a democracy or a dictatorship
Answer:
a government basically either a democracy
The United States is a representative democracy. This means that our government is elected by citizens. Here, citizens vote for their government officials. ... Voting in an election and contacting our elected officials are two ways that Americans can participate in their democracy.
Give all power to the many, they will oppress the few: give all power to the few. they will oppress the many. -
Alexander Hamilton 1787
There are two passions which have a powerful influence on the affairs of men. These are ambition and avarice
(extreme greed); the love of power and the love of money.- Benjamin Franklin 1787
From the nature of man, we may be sure that those who have power in their hands....will always, when they
can...increase it. -George Mason 1787.
1. What view of human nature is expressed in each of these statements?
These statements given by Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin and George Mason express the egocentric human nature.
The first statement highlights how power corrupts a person and makes him egocentric and self-centered. Hamilton tells how people exploit their position and power to oppress others and to gain more more power.
In the second statement Franklin tells how power and money drive people and their ambitions. Today the world is competing in different sectors like space, biotechnology, marine explorations, etc. All these passions and ambitions either to gain power or to gain money.
In the third statement George Manson highlights the power-hungry nature of human beings and how he always tend to increase his power. This was also noted in the concept of Lebensraum given to Hitler by his advisor which made Hitler over-ambitious and egocentric.
To learn more about Political power visit:
brainly.com/question/4591301
#SPJ9
which of the following statements is most likely to be made by a convict criminologist?
The statement most likely to be made by a convict criminologist is: Treatment should be given precedence over security in prison. The answer is c.
A convict criminologist is a criminologist who has personal experience with the criminal justice system, often as a former convict or inmate. This unique perspective shapes their views on corrections and rehabilitation. Statement c suggests that treatment, such as rehabilitation programs, counseling, and therapy, should take priority over security measures within prisons.
A convict criminologist is likely to emphasize the importance of addressing the underlying causes of criminal behavior and providing opportunities for offenders to reform and reintegrate into society successfully.
They may argue that focusing on treatment can lead to reduced recidivism rates and better outcomes for individuals within the corrections system. This perspective challenges the traditional emphasis on punishment and deterrence and aligns with the belief in the potential for rehabilitation and redemption. Hence, c. is the answer,
The complete question is:
Which of the following statements is most likely to be made by a convict criminologist?
a. Modern corrections can benefit from the use of larger correctional institutions.
b. We need to increase the use of incarceration for nonviolent drug offenders.
c. Treatment should be given precedence over security in prison.
d. We need to continue the war on drugs.
To know more about criminologist, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/12688122#
#SPJ11
Mr. Hudson, isn't it true that you first meet June
Harris on April 14, 1981, is an example of what
kind of question?
Help me please I need to pass
QUESTION 2 (S01, AC 2) Identify and explain under what circumstances does the bill of right get to change?
The Bill of Rights, which refers to the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution, can be changed under specific circumstances. There are two primary methods for amending the Bill of Rights are Formal Amendment Process and Judicial Interpretation.
Formal Amendment Process: The formal amendment process requires a proposed amendment to be passed by a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. After that, the amendment must be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures. This process has been used to amend the Constitution in the past, including the addition of the 27th Amendment.
Judicial Interpretation: The Bill of Rights can also be changed through the process of judicial interpretation by the Supreme Court. Over time, the Court's interpretations of the Bill of Rights have shaped and evolved the understanding of individual rights. Landmark cases, such as Brown v. Board of Education and Obergefell v. Hodges, have expanded and redefined constitutional rights based on evolving societal norms and values.
It is important to note that the principles and protections outlined in the Bill of Rights are generally considered fundamental and enduring. However, they can be subject to change through the formal amendment process or through the interpretation and application of the Constitution by the courts.
Know more about Bill of Rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ8
1. Presidents are paid to have jobs as morale builders, agenda
setters, and persuaders. Explain to what extent do these jobs come
from the Constitution?
Presidents as Emergency Supervisors-The Established power as "President" has formed into the crucial present day occupation of "crisis overseer."
The President has become a central member in global emergencies over the past two centuries as the United States gained global authority.
The President ought to enter "crisis mode" and concentrate on the immediate issue whenever there is a conflict, such as the Korean War, the Vietnam War, or the Persian Gulf War, or when there are less well-known local disputes, such as those in Kosovo, Somalia, or Haiti. Locally, crises could occur — like metropolitan ruckuses, tempests, or boondocks fires — that require the President to design time to work with government responses to the situation.
Administrators and Symbols :The President is the most important person in the world because he or she represents the nation, its people, and its ideals. A President performs a variety of stylized duties in this position, such as obtaining unknown dignitaries, tossing the primary baseball of the time, and walking on red rugs while waving to crowds.
These are not insignificant activities. Solid presidents ought to exude confidence not only in themselves but also in the nation of the United States. The most effective ones have attracted the public's confidence with an intangible appeal
As a result, the president ought to recruit and appoint a large number of people to high-level government positions. The President is in charge of all arrangements, including bureau individuals, many sub-Cabinet positions, bureaucratic adjudicators like Supreme Court Justices, diplomats, top military pioneers, and heads of autonomous government organizations.
Despite the fact that candidates are likely to receive approval from the Senate, this responsibility is significant given that presidents control over 4,000 arrangements for taxpayer-funded organizations.
Presidents as Agenda Setters Presidents have a lot of authority over how administrators plan their work, especially when it comes to international issues. Throughout the last long stretches of the Cold War, U.S. international strategy was characterized by Ronald Reagan's firm opposition to socialism.
Recently, a position has opened up for setting a political strategy. The coordinators clearly expected that Congress begin to stand out in characterizing limits and choosing techniques.
Learn more about President:
brainly.com/question/30560991
#SPJ4
If I was a reporter in the country of Washington D.C and the President sent the Secret Service and they told me that I cannot report anything about the president anymore. What amendment is the government infringing on (what amendment protects me from that)?
Answer:
The First Amendment
Explanation:
In the United States Constitution, the First Amendment state that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the PRESS; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Thus, Freedom of the PRESS is part of the United States First Amendment, that protects the right of individuals to acquire and disseminate data or viewpoints without government censorship or concern of penalty.
Hence, in this case, the amendment the government is infringing on is THE FIRST AMENDMENT
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
Can you sue and win if someone is black mailing you over something illegal you did. If not is there any thing else you can do to take legal action and protect yourself.
Articles of Confederation provided for a Congress that met for one-year terms. Why do you suppose the Framers of the Constitution created a Congress that meets for a term of two years?
Answer:
can you provide more information
Explanation:
Examine each situation described below. Which case does not involve a privilege?
A. An attomey wants a physician to testify that his patient has Alzheimer's disease.
B. An abused woman is willing to testify against her husband to send him to jail for assaulting her.
C. A man confesses to his clergyman that he murdered two people.
D. A state prosecutor wants a psychiatrist to testify that a woman confessed to him that she used to beat her son when he was little.
Mark for review (Will be highlighted on the review page)
Answer: A
Explanation:
But i might be wrong if so it is D
Your first big case is a multiple murder.As defense attorney for Sy Kopath, you have come to the realization that he really did break into a couple's home and torture and kill them in the course of robbing them of jewelry and other valuables. He has even confessed to you that he did it. However, you are also aware that the police did not read him his Miranda warning and that he was coerced into giving a confession without your presence. What should you do? Would your answer be different if you believed that he was innocent or didn't know for sure either way?
Answer: ok he did it
Explanation:The reason is because 1+1 is 2 - 1 thats 3 quick maths.
in illinois v. wardlow, the supreme court ruled that unexplained flight from the police:
In Illinois v. Wardlow, the Supreme Court ruled that unexplained flight from the police is a relevant factor in determining reasonable suspicion for a stop and frisk.
The Court held that the sudden flight from the presence of police, in an area known for high drug activity, provided reasonable suspicion for the police to make a Terry stop and frisk. The Court noted that the suspect's behavior was not enough on its own to create reasonable suspicion, but in combination with other factors, such as the location and the time of day, it was sufficient. The Court's decision in Wardlow affirmed the importance of considering all relevant circumstances in determining whether an individual's actions give rise to reasonable suspicion, and it continues to be cited in cases involving police stops and searches.
To learn more about Supreme Court, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29604190
#SPJ11
What can a person face for refusing to help another if they caused the specific harm?
Answer:
The person will have
1:a guilty conscience
2:the person will be rejected
Even though security training varies from agency to agency, for which of the following jobs might a trained private security officer be qualified?
private investigator
gaming surveillance officer
a New York security guard with a firearm permit
loss prevention security officer
What group in the United States is MOST likely to be stereotyped as involved with organized crime?
Russian Americans
Italian Americans
Albanian Americans
Irish Americans
Answer:
I would think Italians Americans to Russian Americans being more related to the cold war
Explanation:
I may be wrong
Answer:
Italian Americans
Explanation:
Texas law requires that all ___ take the driving skills exam to receive a drivers license
-The amount of alcohol in a person's body is measured by
What right is protected by the 5th amendment
Explanation:
no person shall be held to answer for a capital unless on presentment or indictment of a grand jury
Answer:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital
Explanation:
It covers a number of topics and issues including the grand jury, double jeopardy, self-incrimination ("taking the fifth"), due process, and eminent domain.
policy claims advocate changing or strengthening fundamental religious or philosophical beliefs.
group of answer choices
A.true
B.false
The given statement "policy claims advocate changing or strengthening fundamental religious " is true Policy because claims do not advocate changing or strengthening fundamental religious or philosophical beliefs.
A policy claims advocate is a professional who assists claimants in navigating the process of filing and resolving insurance claims. They are experts in handling complex insurance policies and can help claimants understand their rights and options under their insurance policy.
An advocate will review the claim, assess coverage and advise on the best course of action when dealing with insurers. They can review settlement offers to ensure they are fair and negotiate with insurers to get a better outcome for the claimant.
To know more about insurance policy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24984403
#SPJ4
urisdiction gives federal courts the authority to hear certain kinds of cases. to make decisions based on the law. to hear arguments from different parties. to make decisions based on precedents.
The jurisdiction provides federal courts with the ability to hear particular types of lawsuits. It offers them the power to make decisions based on the law.
Jurisdiction is the authority given to the federal courts to hear specific types of cases, which means they can make decisions based on the law. The authority may be granted by the constitution or by legislation. Jurisdiction can be of different types, such as exclusive jurisdiction, concurrent jurisdiction, original jurisdiction, or appellate jurisdiction.
Exclusive jurisdiction indicates that only a federal court has the authority to hear a particular case. Concurrent jurisdiction, on the other hand, allows state and federal courts to have the authority to hear certain cases. Original jurisdiction refers to the authority to hear a case first before any other court, while appellate jurisdiction means the power to review a lower court’s decision. In all cases, the court is expected to hear arguments from different parties and make decisions based on precedents.
Learn more about jurisdiction from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
1. the theories and perspectives in this unit focus on the environmental and social
influence of crime. do you think that environmental and social conditions influence
crime? why or why not? between biological, psychological, and social factors,
which one do you think plays the biggest role in crime? why?--
Environmental and social factors do have an impact on crime. However, the factors that have the greatest influence are psychological.
What is crime?A crime is a term to refer to a voluntary wrongful or reprehensible action that according to the law must be reprimanded and prohibited.
When a person commits a crime many factors influence him to carry out this act, some of this influence is:
Environmental: It is the environmental factor that influences a person to commit a crime, generally refers to the influence of an environment on the behavior of a person to commit a crime.Social: This factor refers to the influence of social dynamics such as: stratification, segregation, discrimination, among others, that influence the behavior of one or more individuals to commit a crime.Psychological: This factor refers to the interpretation of reality and the autonomous thoughts of the individual to commit a crime.According to the above, it can be inferred that of the factors that influence a crime, the most important is the psychological factor because it has a greater impact on the individual's thinking.
Learn more about crime in: https://brainly.com/question/15691073
Rough Canyon Adventures, Inc., and Sturdy Stuff Inc. enter into an oral contract for Sturdy's sale to Rough of five rafts for $2,000 each. Before Rough takes possession of the rafts, this contract is enforceable by
a. Sturdy only.
b. Rough only.
c. any interested third party, such as a Rough tour guide or client.
d. none of the choices
Before Rough takes possession of the rafts, this contract is enforceable by option (d) none of the choices
The statute of frauds requires certain types of contracts, including contracts for the sale of goods worth $500 or more, to be in writing to be enforceable. In this case, the oral contract between Rough Canyon Adventures, Inc. and Sturdy Stuff Inc. for the sale of five rafts for $2,000 each exceeds the $500 threshold, making it unenforceable.
Therefore, neither Sturdy nor Rough, nor any third party, can enforce this contract. It is important to have a written contract for transactions that fall under the statute of frauds to ensure the parties' rights and obligations are clear and enforceable in a court of law.
Therefore, the correct option is (d) none of the choices
Learn more about statute of frauds here
brainly.com/question/30884790
#SPJ4
If a person takes the 5th" and refuses to speak so as not to incriminate themselves, this is the 5th Amendment protection against ?
A right against forced self-incrimination.
Describe two ways how social media platforms are abused
Answer:
reasons is because Uninvited, awful photos are sent to you, and you are expected to repay the favor. It makes you feel obligated to send in obscene movies. Takes your passwords or forces you to reveal them to them. Constantly texts you, making you feel as if you must have your phone with you at all times for fear of being penalized.
Explanation:
can i please get brainlest?
do you agree by that crime prevention could be answered only by one policing style,modell,approach, or strategy? yes or no.
No, crime prevention could not be answered only by one policing style, Model, approach, or strategy because there are varied crimes and all can not judge by one policing style, model, etc. Therefore in our constitutions varied laws, act and policies are mentioned.
What is crime prevention?
The first requirement of justice is prevention,
"Crime prevention" refers to techniques and tactics aimed at lowering the likelihood that crimes will be committed, as well as their potentially damaging effects on people and society, including the fear of crime, by intervening to affect their various causes.
It takes a multi-sectoral, multi-disciplinary, and integrated effort to prevent crime.
There is clear evidence that well-planned crime prevention measures not only prevent crime and victimization, but also increase community safety and contribute to sustainable development of countries, the introduction to the Guidelines for the Prevention of Crime states. All citizens' lives are improved by effective, ethical crime prevention.
To know more about crime preventing, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/18258200
#SPJ9
the nevada enabling act required that the nevada constitution:
The Nevada Enabling Act required that the Nevada Constitution be drafted.
What was required by the Nevada Enabling Act?The Nevada Enabling Act, enacted in 1864 by the U.S. Congress, was a crucial step in Nevada's path towards statehood. It established the necessary conditions for Nevada to establish its own state government. Among the provisions outlined in the act was the requirement for Nevada to draft and adopt a state constitution.
This constitution would serve as the foundational document for the governance of the state. In response, the people of Nevada proceeded to draft and ratify their constitution later in 1864. This milestone marked an essential component in fulfilling the criteria set forth by the Nevada Enabling Act and ultimately led to Nevada's admission as the 36th state of the United States.
Learn more about the Nevada Enabling Act
brainly.com/question/28275016
#SPJ11
Discuss the centrally of the law to a stable or social order
The law is indispensable for maintaining social order, regulating behavior, resolving disputes, and safeguarding individual rights and freedoms in a stable society.
The centrality of the law to a stable or social order is a key concept in the legal system. It is essential for a stable society that there be clear rules and procedures in place to regulate behavior and resolve disputes. The law serves as a framework for maintaining social order by ensuring that people are held accountable for their actions and that disputes are resolved fairly and impartially.
Without the law, there would be no way to regulate behavior and maintain social order. The law provides a common language and set of rules that apply to everyone, regardless of their status or position in society. This helps to prevent conflicts and ensure that people are treated fairly. The law also provides a mechanism for protecting individual rights and freedoms. It establishes legal rights and protections that can be enforced through the courts.
This helps to ensure that everyone is able to enjoy the benefits of a free and democratic society. In conclusion, the centrality of the law to a stable or social order cannot be overstated. The law is essential for regulating behavior, resolving disputes, and protecting individual rights and freedoms. It is a key component of a free and democratic society and is critical to maintaining social order.
To learn more about social order
https://brainly.com/question/30949477
#SPJ11