The two requirements for applicants that are universal for all police departments are
Answer: To requirements are, Be a U.S citizens and applicants must be at least 21 years old.
Explanation:
Answer:
a and c
Explanation:
Người ấy sống mãi trong lòng tôi
Answer:
Maesi ka alqn kerish akab Mai laoba banjc aoai
Personal Reflection: Reflect on the final product process. What advice would you share with a
student completing this project next year? What worked well? What could be improved? What
did you enjoy? What did you learn about research?
Answer:
A good research must revolve around a novel question and must be based on a feasible study plan. It must make a significant contribution to scientific development by addressing an unanswered question or by solving a problem or difficulty that existed in the real world.
Explanation:
I would say something like this.
I am doing a follow up case on the Dadeville shooting in alabama. The suspects were charged with 4 counts of reckless murder. More charges will be filed. Going based off of the 4 counts what is the recommended sentencing based on alabama state law?
.
Some general factors that would influence sentencing recommendations include:
• The specifics of the charges (e.g. reckless murder vs. 1st degree murder) and the number of charges. More/lesser charges would impact sentencing.
• Alabama sentencing guidelines which provide ranges for different types of felonies based on offense levels. Reckless murder would likely fall into a higher offense level.
• The criminal history of the offenders. Prior criminal records could increase recommended sentences.
• Circumstances of the crime. Especially aggravating factors could warrant longer sentences.
• Discretion of the judge. Sentencing ultimately comes down to the judge's discretion within the applicable laws and guidelines.
Without knowing the details of the Dadeville shooting case, charges, criminal histories of the offenders, and judge's sentencing philosophy, I cannot determine precise recommended sentences for the 4 reckless murder charges. The sentences could range from many years to potentially life imprisonment, depending on the factors.
The best approach is to review the specific laws on reckless murder sentencing in Alabama, the guidelines, details of the charges and offenders in this case, and decisions in similar previous cases to help determine an appropriate recommendation range for each charge. But there are too many unknowns based on the information provided for me to give more precise recommendations. Please let me know if you have any other questions.
What precedent was established by Gideon v. Wainwright? O The accused have the right to double jeopardy © The accused have the right to no illegal searches O The accused have the right to an attorney O The accused must have their rights read to them
The precedent that was established by Gideon v. Wainwright is option C. The accused have the right to an attorney.
What informs Gideon v. Wainwright?Gideon v. Wainwright is informed by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which guarantees the right to counsel in criminal prosecutions. The Supreme Court case established that this right applies to state courts as well as federal courts, and that states must provide counsel to defendants who cannot afford to hire their own attorney.
The case was brought by Clarence Earl Gideon, who was charged with a felony in Florida and was unable to afford an attorney. He argued that his Sixth Amendment rights were being violated because the state would not provide him with a lawyer. The Supreme Court agreed and overturned his conviction, setting a precedent that has been relied upon in many subsequent cases.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above
learn more about Gideon v. Wainwright: https://brainly.com/question/989709
#SPJ1
what are some situations where it may be unclear what would be classified as a reasonable search?
Create a debate between two people. On one side, you have one of the black lives matter protesters who supported the removal of this particular statue. On the other side, you have a resident who disagrees.
What make’s Confirmation different from Ratification
Answer: Where the signature is subject to ratification, acceptance, or approval, the signature does not establish the consent to be bound. However, it is a means of authentication and expresses the willingness of the signatory state to continue the treaty-making process. The signature qualifies the signatory state to proceed to ratification, acceptance, or approval. It also creates an obligation to refrain, in good faith, from acts that would defeat the object and the purpose of the treaty.
Explanation:
Answer:
Confirmation is verification or final proof of something. (Example) In the church, confirmation is a rite in which a person is awarded full acceptance into.
Compare the Bill of Rights from our last unit with the International Human rights Law from
this unit, pick two rights that are in one but not the other and explain why you think this
happened.
When comparing the Bill of Rights, which refers to the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, with International Human Rights Law, represented primarily by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), there are indeed rights that are present in one but not the other. Two such examples are:
The Right to Keep and Bear Arms (in the Bill of Rights, specifically the Second Amendment): This right is not explicitly present in International Human Rights Law, as articulated in the UDHR. The reason for this omission can be attributed to the different historical, cultural, and legal contexts of the United States compared to the international community. The right to bear arms holds significant historical and constitutional significance in the United States due to its association with self-defense, the protection of individual liberties, and the historical context of the American Revolution.The Right to Asylum (in International Human Rights Law, specifically Article 14 of the UDHR): This right is not explicitly mentioned in the Bill of Rights. The absence of this right in the Bill of Rights can be attributed to the fact that the United States Constitution primarily focuses on the relationship between the government and its citizens, whereas the right to asylum relates to the treatment of individuals seeking refuge in a country due to fear of persecution in their home country. Asylum is a concept more closely associated with international law and human rights frameworks, addressing the rights and protections of individuals across borders.These differences highlight how legal documents and frameworks can reflect the unique historical, cultural, and legal contexts of a particular country, shaping the specific rights enshrined within them.For more such questions on Amendments
https://brainly.com/question/458137
#SPJ8
is it difficult to amend the U.S. constitution? why or why not?use examples from the activity and connect them to real-world challenges. (write 4-5 sentences)
think about a change you'd like to make to our laws. Write it down in the form of a new amendment to the constitution.
It is difficult to amend the U.S. constitution because it's time consuming and takes a lot of process before it's implemented.
A change that I'll like to make is regarding gun laws.
What is the amendment about?The amendment procedure is complicated and time-consuming: A proposed amendment must be approved by two-thirds of both houses of Congress and then ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures.
According to comparative constitutional law scholars, the United States Constitution is the most difficult democratic constitution in the world to change through formal amendment.
The Framers made amending the Constitution relatively difficult because they wanted all ratified amendments to have widespread support.
Learn more about Constitution on:
https://brainly.com/question/16385413
#SPJ1
1.
is the system or institution made up of a group of
People that takes care or manages a country or state.
What is the legal speed limit of school zones in Florida
Answer:
20 miles per hour
Explanation:
I only know because I got pulled over on the way out of school lol
what is the work of the legislature
Answer:
make laws for a political entity such as a country or city.
Explanation:
A legislature is an assembly with the authority to make laws for a political entity such as a country or city. They are often contrasted with the executive and judicial powers of government.
the boys are annoying and they make my blood boil.
Answer:
not all boys are the same lol :)
Explanation:
One of the fundamental rights of defendants in the justice system is the right to a fair trial. How is this right protected when a jury is sequestered?
Answer:
Accused rights include the right to fair trial, get bail, hire a criminal lawyer, free legal aid in India, and more. As per the legal principle, one is considered innocent until proven guilty. The legal maxim reads out – “ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat”.Under our Constitution as also the international treaties and conventions, the right to get a fair trial is a basic fundamental/human right1. He has a right to defend himself as a part of his human as also fundamental right as enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law.to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you6 Fundamental Rights in Indian Constitution are as- Right to equality, Right to freedom, Right against exploitation, Right to freedom of religion, Cultural and educational rights, Right to constitutional remedies.
The jury will not hear things from outside sources that might influence their decision.
HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
D
Explanation:
it took the test :)
Answer:ice can turn into water
Explanation:because of the heat
how is texas’s court system different from many other states?
Answer:
two courts of last resort
Explanation:
Supreme: Unlike most states, Texas has two courts of last resort, also called supreme courts. ... They also hear cases appealed from the federal Fifth Circuit courts. The Texas Supreme Court hears civil appeals, while the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals hears criminal cases, including death penalty appeals.
BRAINLIEST
Click the links to open the resources below. These resources will help you complete the assignment. Once you have created your file(s) and are ready to upload your assignment, click the Add Files button below and select each file from your desktop or network folder. Upload each file separately.
Assignment Information
Purpose Write a Supreme Court opinion that describes your decision for United
States v. Fields.
Assignment Prompt
In this assignment, you will write a three- to four-paragraph Supreme Court opinion for
the fictional case of United States v. Fields. Remember, you are serving as a Supreme
Court justice. Your opinion must summarize the facts of the case, state your decision,
and cite precedent to support your ideas.
Step 1: Carefully review the progress you have made up to this point.
a) Take time to review the facts.
) Why was Abel Fields convicted?
(2) What law was he convicted under?
(3) How did the appeals court rule on the case?
(4) What has Fields argued in his case before the Supreme Court?
(5) What are Fields's prosecutors arguing?
b) Take time to review precedent.
(1) What did New York Times v. Sullivan demonstrate about the right to make
false statements?
(2) What did Texas v. Johnson demonstrate about the right to disagreeable
speech?
Step 2: Develop a three- to four-paragraph opinion.
a) Your opinion should be three to four paragraphs long and written in your own
words.
b) The introduction should:
(1) Review the facts of the case
Answer:
The links do not work. Sorry.
Answer:
This is the Supreme Court opinion on the case of United States v. Fields. Abel Fields, a resident of California, is being tried for violating the Stolen Valor Act which was signed into law in 2006. In 2011, Abel Fields attended a city meeting about public safety.
He spoke publicly at the meeting, explaining that his military experience gave him the knowledge to speak with authority about public safety issues.
During his speech, he claimed that he had served in the military for eight years. He also claimed that he had received the Purple Heart, a prestigious medal. However, each of Fields’s claims was false. He had never served in the military, and he had never received a medal. After being found guilty and charged with an $1,000 fine, Fields appealed the court’s decision which brings us here.
Abel Fields argued that the Stolen Valor Act was unconstitutional, and that his right to free speech had been violated, therefore, I will be taking in a count of several similar rulings on other cases to help me make a decision.
Which situation is
an example of indirect taxation?
what is the measuring unit of mass
Answer:
its measured in kilograms
One way of classifying law in Australia is by the ways in which it is made. There are two sources of law in Australia: common law and statute law.
Explain the difference between the way that laws are made in Australia through parliaments and through the courts.
12 Delilah is trying to explain how her cousin ended up in prison. She says, 'He started running with the wrong crowd. What theory is Delilah MOST likely putting forth to explain her cousin's behavior? A. social disorganization theory B. hormonal theory C. social learning theory D. psychopathy
Answer:
C. Social Learning Theory
Explanation:
Social learning theory suggests that social behavior is learned by observing and imitating the behavior of others.
In your case, Delilah says her cousin was running with the wrong crowd meaning her cousin learned and imitated the behavior of the "wrong crowd".
Deliah is most likely putting forth the theory of Social learning. Thus, Option (C) is the correct one.
What is Social learning theory?
According to the social learning theory, people learn social conduct by seeing and copying the actions of others. The social learning theory was created by psychologist Albert Bandura as an alternative to the earlier work of his colleague B.F. Skinner is famous for having influenced behaviourism.
In order for learning, Bandura, who developed the idea of social learning theory, suggests five crucial steps: observation, attention, retention, reproduction, and motivation.
The social learning hypothesis seeks to demonstrate that people may learn in a variety of ways. People make decisions based on their own reflection, but their environment has the biggest impact on how they act and develop.
According to Bandura, most human behaviour is learnt through imitation, modelling, and observation.
Hence, Option (C) is the correct one.
Learn more about Social learning theory, from:
brainly.com/question/26256217
#SPJ2
It is often said that since the September 11th attacks in 2001, there has been an increase in the number of public-private law enforcement and security services partnerships because of the “perception of increased risk” in the United States. What does “perception of increased risk” do to the realities of protecting U.S citizens from terrorism and how does that relate to partnerships between law enforcement and private security?
Describe the connection between risk, “perceived risk,” and the level of need for protection. Use evidence to support your statements and opinions.
The "perception of increased risk" heightens the demand for security measures and fosters partnerships between law enforcement and private security to enhance protection of U.S. citizens from terrorism.
The perception of greater risk has a number of consequences for the realities of defending American citizens from terrorism. For starters, it increases the demand for security measures and creates a greater sense of urgency to avert future assaults. The anxiety and apprehension produced by the assaults drives individuals and organisations to seek security against prospective dangers.
The level of perceived risk impacts the level of protection required. When people believe there is a significant chance of terrorism, they seek increased security measures to offset that risk. This rising demand for security services opens the door to collaboration between law enforcement and private security businesses. These collaborations combine the resources, experience, and skills of both sectors to improve security, intelligence sharing, and incident response.
The rise of public-private partnerships since 9/11 provides evidence of the link between risk, perceived danger, and the level of need for security. Through efforts such as the Department of Homeland Security's Infrastructure Protection Partnership, the federal government has encouraged collaboration between law enforcement agencies and commercial security firms. These collaborations strive to combine the investigative and enforcement powers of law enforcement with the specialized knowledge and resources of private security.
The rise of public-private partnerships since 9/11 provides evidence of the link between risk, perceived danger, and the level of need for security. Through efforts such as the Department of Homeland Security's Infrastructure Protection Partnership, the federal government has encouraged collaboration between law enforcement agencies and commercial security firms. These collaborations strive to combine the investigative and enforcement powers of law enforcement with the specialized knowledge and resources of private security.
For more questions on law enforcement
https://brainly.com/question/29422434
#SPJ8
explain term sadness
bye :-(
Answer:
Sadness is a type of bad feeling
A body was discovered at the pier on Grand Lake at 6:45 AM on August 3rd. The
medical examiner determined the man was killed by gunshot wound to the chest.
The body began to show the beginning stages of rigor mortis so the medical
examiner determined the person died four hours prior to being found. The person
actually died 4 hours and 15 minutes prior to being found according to a local
fisherman who heard the gunshot.
While hopping between boats on Navy Pier, a man vanished. The body discovered in Lake Michigan belonged to him, according to the officials.
How long has it been since someone died?The period of time following a person's passing is known as the post-mortem interval (PMI). When the exact time of death is unknown, the interval can be computed and a rough time of death established.
Does every patient who passes away in a hospital have an autopsy performed?Not everyone has an autopsy. The family (or next of kin) of patients who pass away in hospitals is questioned regarding whether they would like an autopsy. If the patient has a living will or advance directives that clearly state their preferences
To Know more about Navy Pier Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19905349
#SPJ1
Regarding drinking and driving, it takes courage to ..
Regarding drinking and driving, it takes courage to ask for help, go for rehabilitation or report yourself to the authority.
What is the issue of drinking and driving about?Alcohol has an impact on the areas of your brain that manage your skill and judgment. The more alcohol you consume, the worse you get at things.
Drinking and driving may seem like a good idea when you're intoxicated, but even small amounts of alcohol can affect your reaction times and cause double or blurred vision, which puts you in danger when operating a vehicle. You run the danger of causing an accident while intoxicated, leaving you with a totaled vehicle and a large insurance claim.
Learn more about drinking and driving from
https://brainly.com/question/1173942
#SPJ1
Explain how the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment protects different groups of
Americans.
The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment is a critical component of the U.S. Constitution that ensures that all citizens are treated equally under the law. The clause states that no state shall "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." This clause has been used to protect different groups of Americans from discrimination based on factors such as race, gender, sexual orientation, and age.
The Equal Protection Clause was first used to strike down state laws that discriminated against African Americans during the Civil Rights Era. It was also used to protect women from discrimination in cases such as Reed v. Reed, where the Supreme Court ruled that the Equal Protection Clause prohibited arbitrary discrimination based on gender. Similarly, the clause has been used to protect LGBTQ+ individuals from discrimination, including the landmark case of Obergefell v. Hodges which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
Additionally, the Equal Protection Clause has been used to protect other minority groups, including people with disabilities and immigrants. In Plyler v. Doe, the Supreme Court ruled that undocumented immigrant children were entitled to the same education as citizens, thus extending the protections of the clause to non-citizens.
Overall, the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment ensures that all individuals, regardless of their race, gender, sexual orientation, or any other protected characteristic, are afforded equal protection under the law. It has been instrumental in promoting equality and justice for marginalized groups throughout U.S. history.
What is Technical Writing and how is it used in law enforcement?
Answer:
Technical writing is the practice of documenting processes, such as software manuals or instructional materials. Lawyers, judges, and legislators employ this type of writing for laws, expression of rights, duties, and other legal analysis.
Explanation:
Pictures:
describe what you see in each of the images displayed
Analysis:
What goal(s) do you think these images represent or portray?
Debrief:
*Explained by teacher - describe and provide examples of each goal of the US foreign policy.
The pictures show the US military forces, The Homeland Security Agency and aircraft. The United States Armed Forces comprise of six service branches that make up the armed forces: the Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force, Space Force, and Coast Guard.
What are the goals of Homeland Security?To protect the country from the numerous threats we encounter is the Department of Homeland Security's crucial mission. More than 260,000 personnel must work hard to accomplish this, with tasks ranging from aviation and border security to emergency response, from cybersecurity analysts to chemical facility inspectors. In order to safeguard the confidentiality, integrity, availability, authenticity, and non-repudiation of user data, the U.S. Department of Defense has established the Five Pillars of Information Assurance concept.
The three main aims of American foreign policy are security, wealth, and the improvement of the world. The protection of America's interests and residents is a continuous issue, yet throughout history, America has tried to accomplish security in various ways.
To learn more about Homeland Security, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29742288
#SPJ1
Ahmed has been working in the fire protection services since a few months. His primary responsibility is to suppress wildlife fires and provide hazardous fuels reduction services to land management agencies. Which of these firefighting career roles does Ahmed perform?
A.
fire safety educator
B.
wildland firefighter
C.
fire inspector
D.
smoke jumper
Answer:
B. Wildlife fire fighter
Explanation:
A- He would teach how to prevent fire.
B- He would physically go out and fire the fire which he does to suppress it.
C- He would have to see how a started after it was put out.
D- He would physically have to put out the fire.
Answer:
The correct answer here is Smoke Jumper
Explanation:
They're the only other ones there that help suppress fires, plus it was right on PLATO.
Plato Gang ;)