Question 1: describe toll of the great depression, mentioning at least 3 facts from the document.

The Constitutional Convention was called in 1787 to address issues with the Articles of Confederation, the first constitution of the United States. The Articles, which had been ratified in 1781, had several weaknesses, including a lack of power given to the national government to regulate commerce and enforce laws. Additionally, the national government could not levy taxes or regulate currency, which caused financial difficulties.

Another major issue with the Articles of Confederation was that it did not provide a means for amending the document. This meant that any changes to the Articles required the unanimous consent of all 13 states, which was highly unlikely to happen. This made it difficult for the national government to adapt to changing circumstances and address new issues as they arose.

The Constitutional Convention was called to address these issues and create a new constitution that would strengthen the national government and provide it with the necessary power to govern effectively. The convention was attended by representatives from 12 of the 13 states (Rhode Island did not attend) and was held in Philadelphia from May to September of 1787. The result of the convention was the United States Constitution, which was later ratified by the states and went into effect in 1789.

Answer:

Joe Bidome

Explanation:

Joseph Robinette Bidome Jr. is an American politician who is the 46th and current president of the United States. A member of the Democratic Party, he served as the 47th vice president from 2009 to 2017 under Barack Obama and represented Delaware in the United States Senate from 1973 to 2009.

Joe bidome

filler filler          

Answer:

South Korea invaded the North Korea in the year 1950

Answer:

Tt had replaced its governor, Sam Houston, who had refused to take an oath of allegiance to the Confederacy.

Explanation:

Sport served as a fraternal epoxy in the period of nation-building by fostering a sense of unity, identity, and camaraderie among individuals, while partisanship played a role in shaping the rivalries and loyalties associated with different sports teams.

Sport has long been recognized as a unifying force, bringing people together across various social and cultural divides. During the period of nation-building, sport played a crucial role in creating a shared national identity by providing a platform for collective experiences and celebrations. Sporting events and competitions allowed individuals to rally around a common cause, instilling a sense of pride and belonging in the nation.

However, partisanship also played a significant role in this process. Partisanship refers to the strong allegiance and loyalty individuals hold towards a particular team or sports organization. This allegiance often stems from regional, cultural, or historical affiliations. Partisanship added an element of rivalry and competition to sports, fueling passions and intensifying the sense of identity and belonging. The competition between different teams or fan bases created a sense of camaraderie among supporters and further solidified the bond within the nation.

To know more about epoxy, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/31597386

#SPJ4

------------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:

"How and why did sport serve as a fraternal epoxy in this period of nation-building? What role did partisanship play in this regard?"-----------

Answer:

Paul Revere joined the Son's of Liberty in 1760

Answer:

Early summer of 1765

Explanation:

Hope this answer helps :)

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

Read the excerpt from "Woman's Rights to the Suffrage." It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union. And we formed it, not to give the blessings of liberty, but to secure them; not to the half of ourselves and the half of our [descendants], but to the whole people – women as well as men. And it is a downright mockery to talk to women of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty while they are denied the use of the only means of securing them provided by this democratic-republican government – the ballot. Which fact supports Anthony's opinion that all adults should have the right to vote?  we, the whole people, who formed the Union. they are denied the use of the only means of securing them . . . And it is a downright mockery to talk to women . . . not to give the blessings of liberty . . .

Answer:

We, the whole people, who formed the Union.

Explanation:

According to the text Anthony shows that the constitution allows the right to vote for American citizens, the people. In this, she affirms that citizens are all adults who have sufficient capacity to discern and reason, including men, women, whites and blacks, that is, all adult people in the country and the right to vote guaranteed by the constitution. This can be reinforced through the lines "It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union."

The post provides information about the appointment of Paolo DeMaria as the new CEO of the National Association of State Boards of Education (NASBE) and discusses the potential impact of this organizational change.

Here are some questions that can be asked about the post:

1. Who conducted the search for the new CEO of NASBE?

2. What were the criteria or qualifications considered during the selection process?

3. What specific successes did Paolo DeMaria achieve as the superintendent of the state of Ohio?

4. How does DeMaria's 30-year background contribute to his suitability for the CEO position?

5. What are the shared values between DeMaria and NASBE in terms of furthering children's education?

6. In what ways can DeMaria's appointment be seen as an adaptive change?

7. How might DeMaria's leadership style and practices potentially introduce innovation to NASBE?

8. Are there any specific new practices or ethics that DeMaria is expected to bring to NASBE?

9. How has DeMaria expressed his commitment to challenging children and improving literacy and overall education development?

10. What are the potential benefits and impacts of this organizational change for NASBE and the education system as a whole?

11. Is there any evidence or examples of Paolo DeMaria's previous efforts and passion for change in children's education?

12. How long has DeMaria been in his role as the CEO of NASBE, and what indicators suggest whether the change has been successful or impactful so far?

These questions can help clarify the information provided and provide a deeper understanding of the organizational change and its potential implications.

To learn more about NASBE refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14088614#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

Professor Cobb's point can be valid if we consider the possibility that even if the document in question is not genuine, it may still reflect certain aspects of today's society concerning black and brown people. While historical authenticity is crucial, it is essential to acknowledge that the document's content might resonate with current social issues faced by marginalized communities. It could highlight enduring systemic biases, racial discrimination, or unequal treatment that persist in various forms. Professor Cobb's argument invites us to critically examine the document's themes and consider their relevance within our contemporary context.

When contemplating why someone would fabricate such a document, several potential purposes come to mind. Firstly, it might serve as a thought-provoking tool, aiming to shed light on historical injustices and their echoes in modern society. By presenting a fictional account rooted in real historical experiences, the intention could be to prompt conversations, foster empathy, and encourage discussions on racial equality. Secondly, the document could be a work of creative expression, seeking to explore the human experience and provoke emotional responses. Lastly, it is possible that someone might create such a document to deceive or manipulate others, exploiting sensitive issues for personal gain or to incite unrest. However, further investigation and analysis would be necessary to determine the true motives behind its creation.

In conclusion, while the authenticity of the document remains uncertain, Professor Cobb raises a valid point by urging us to examine its content in relation to present-day experiences of black and brown communities. Regardless of its origins, the document could provide insights into persistent societal issues, serving as a catalyst for discussions and reflections on racial inequalities. Understanding the purpose behind its creation requires careful examination and consideration of the broader context, encompassing educational, artistic, or potentially manipulative intentions.

Answer:

The Official Secrets Act, 1923

this is your answer

Answer:

It proclaimed the freedom of slaves in the ten Confederate states still in rebellion. It also decreed that freed slaves could be enlisted in the Union Army, thereby increasing the Union's available manpower.

Explanation:

Answer:

there just are bbbbbbbh

Answer:

В)

Explanation:

Separation of powers, which implies the distribution of state power between independent from each other, but at the same time balancing and controlling each other branches: legislative, executive and judicial.

Answer: C , B

Explanation:

Answer:

THe United States winning the war gave us control over more territories. This made us more powerful. This also helped us emerge into a world power. so we are more independent.

Explanation:

Answer:

It also marked the U.S. entry to

international affairs. Since after the conflict, the

U.S. intervened in many conflicts around the

world and entered many treaties and

agreements. It gave way to the building of the

Panama Canal, and also marked the growth of

the U.S. Navy and Army.

The term that best represents a mission statement is  Bass Pro Shop: "To be the leading merchant of outdoor recreational products, inspiring people to love, enjoy, and conserve the great outdoors." The correct option is b).

A mission statement is a brief, concise description of an organization's purpose, values, and long-term goals. It communicates to stakeholders, both internal and external, what the organization stands for and its overall strategic direction.

In this case, Bass Pro Shop's mission statement highlights its aim to be a leading provider of outdoor recreational products and its commitment to inspiring people to appreciate and protect nature. This mission statement conveys the company's core purpose and values, setting the foundation for its strategic objectives and decisions.

Other options, such as the U.S. Army's slogan "Be all that you can be," Kellogg's "Breakfast cereals at a price everyone can afford," and Wal-Mart's "Stores big enough to make shopping interesting for every family member" are not comprehensive mission statements as they only focus on specific aspects of their respective organizations and do not provide a clear, overarching purpose or direction.

Therefore, The correct option is b).

To learn more about Bass Pro Shop click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31320595#

#SPJ11

The changes and conflicts that emerged as Americans developed a national culture are a "mode of governance, ideal of democracy and foreign relations policies."

The period in which the Americans began to develop national culture was around 1800 to 1848.

During this period, many Americans are moving away from slavery, embracing civil rights and other ideals of democracies.

Also, their foreign relations policies move towards expansion throughout the western hemisphere.

Also, there was conflict, particularly on the issue of slavery and suffrages, which led to the American civil war later in 1861 to 1865.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "mode of governance, the idea of democracy and foreign relations policies."

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/14310471

Answer:

The 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was most closely related to the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution . The Full Faith and Credit Clause states that each state must recognize the laws and legal contracts of other states . DOMA used this Clause to prevent any state from having to recognize a same-sex marriage from another state.

The 1996 Defense of Marriage Act was most closely related to the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution.

The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was a law passed in 1996 that defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman for the purposes of federal law. It also allowed states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states.

This law was most closely related to the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution, which requires states to give full faith and credit to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state.

DOMA essentially allowed states to disregard the Full Faith and Credit Clause when it came to recognizing same-sex marriages from other states. In 2013, the Supreme Court struck down a key provision of DOMA in the case of United States v. Windsor, ruling that it violated the Fifth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection under the law.

However, the issue of whether states had to recognize same-sex marriages from other states was not resolved until the 2015 case of Obergefell v. Hodges, in which the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry and that states must recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states.

Learn more about DOMA at

https://brainly.com/question/24785964

#SPJ11

Answer:

The failed rebellion also affected Mexican relations with the United States. Even before the revolt, many Mexican officials had worried that the United States was plotting to gain control of Texas.

Hope this helped, have a good day

Based on the given excerpt, Michael Brown Sr. was speaking about the crisis of discrimination and the rejection of proposals to treat Muslim Americans differently.

Based on the given excerpt, it is difficult to determine the specific political crisis that Michael Brown Sr. was speaking about. However, we can infer that he was addressing the issue of discrimination and the treatment of Muslim Americans. The quote from President Barack Obama emphasizes the responsibility of all Americans to reject discrimination and any proposals that advocate for differential treatment of Muslim Americans.

One possible interpretation is that Michael Brown Sr. was speaking in the context of the broader conversation around Islamophobia and anti-Muslim sentiment that has been prevalent in American society. This crisis involves the discrimination, prejudice, and stigmatization faced by Muslim Americans due to their religious beliefs and perceived association with terrorism.

It is important to note that Michael Brown Sr. is the father of Michael Brown, an African American teenager whose death in 2014 sparked widespread protests and discussions on police brutality and racial profiling. Without additional context, it is challenging to pinpoint the specific political crisis to which he was referring in this particular statement.

For more such question on discrimination

https://brainly.com/question/1084594

#SPJ11

Answer: true!!

Explanation:

ok hope it helps

Answer:

hey mate here is your answer

According to the chapter titled "The Origins of Anti-Mexican Sentiment", by Raymund Paredes, When Anglo Americans first encountered Mexicanos their initial responses were conditioned primarily by the traditions of hispanophobia and anti-Catholicism.

So, True

please mark me as a brainliest

Answer: not exactly

Explanation: being a martyr for Christianity basically means you'll suffer for the religion Christianity, so it depends on how they think you're being ignorant

Answer:

The thick jungle and vegetation hinder american forces from using their material advantage of tanks and other sorts of ground combat vechiles. That's why the US used agent orange to try and clear vegetation and jungle so the vietcong couldn't use it as places to hide and retreat to when ambushing American troops

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The existence of many and conflicting moral viewpoints means that, logically, there are no answers to moral questions but the individual has to develop their own moral concepts that are going to be applied when it decides on an ethical issue.

Ethics studies the moral acts of human beings. Morals study the decisions that stem from the conscience. So there is no logic or reasoning because every individual has its set of moral rules or standards, depending on its culture, race, ethnicity, values, or traditions.  So when the individual is about to make a decision, he or she is aware that there is going to be consequences from that decision and the individual has to live by those consequences.

Answer: They provided the only means of spreading news other than by mere hearsay.

Explanation:

Answer:

b

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is B

Explanation:

RMS Lusitania was the British ocean liner that was sunk on 7 May 1915 by a German U-boat 11 miles off the southern coast of Ireland, killing 1,198 passengers and crew.

It occurred  two years before the United States declared of war on Germany.

Answer:

The Air Pollution Control Act of 1955 was the first federal legislation involving air pollution

Explanation: