Public Defenders____.
A.) must be in their first year of practicing

B.) are paid by the government and must be ethically free from government
direction.

C.) must work pro bono

D.) are paid by the government and must disclose all information related to the
case to the prosecution

The investment advice that Gale most likely to Alex is to invest in Mutual funds, as an investment in mutual funds will have a better return than any other investment.

A mutual fund is an organization that brings collectively cash from many human beings and invests it in stocks, bonds, or different properties.

The mixed holdings of stocks, bonds, or different properties the fund owns are called its portfolio.

Hence, The investment advice that Gale most likely to Alex is to invest in Mutual funds, as an investment in mutual funds will have a better return than any other investment.

learn more about mutual funds here:

https://brainly.com/question/3151209

#SPJ5

The best investing advice Gale would probably provide Alex is to put money into mutual funds since they will yield a higher return than other types of investments.

A mutual fund is a business that pools the money from several investors and uses it to buy stocks, bonds, or other types of real estate. The portfolio of the fund refers to its assortment of stocks, bonds, and various real estate interests.

The primary investments of mutual funds are frequently categorized as money market funds, bond or fixed income funds, stock or equity funds, or hybrid funds. Index funds, which are passively managed funds that follow the performance of an index, are another classification for funds. As a result, Gale will probably advise Alex to invest in mutual funds since they will yield a higher return than any other type of investment.

Learn more about mutual funds here:

https://brainly.com/question/31417979

#SPJ7

Probably the full options are:

A. mutual fund

B. natural resources

C. government bonds

D. certificate of deposit

Doctors should care about social justice because it is essential to providing quality healthcare. Social justice is the fair and just distribution of resources and opportunities in society.

When people are denied access to healthcare, education, housing, and other essential resources, it has a negative impact on their health.

There are many ways that doctors can promote social justice. They can advocate for policies that improve access to healthcare, such as universal healthcare.

They can also work to address the social determinants of health, such as poverty, discrimination, and environmental pollution. Doctors can also educate their patients about social justice issues and how they can make a difference.

To know more about social justice, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28207883#

#SPJ11

It is TRUE that the proper ratio for supervising minors is one supervisor per 20 minors except in cities of the first class (Philadelphia) where it is one supervisor per 5 minors.

In Philadelphia, the proper ratio for the supervision of minors is one supervisor for 5 minors.

However, in the remaining states, one supervisor can supervise up to twenty minors.

Thus, it is TRUE that when not part of a school-endorsed function, the proper ratio for supervising minors is one supervisor per 20 minors except in cities of the first class (Philadelphia) where it is one supervisor per 5 minors.

Learn more about the supervision of minors at https://brainly.com/question/23509933

#SPJ1

The statement: creative blocking may occur when people in the agency implement value-based thinking is FALSE because value-based thinking can actually help to overcome creative blocking by providing a clear direction and purpose for the work, rather than hindering it

Value-based thinking, which involves aligning creative ideas with the values and goals of the client, can actually help to overcome creative blocking by providing a clear direction and purpose for the work.

By understanding the client's needs and priorities, creatives can channel their energy into producing ideas that are more likely to be accepted and successful.

However, it is important to note that value-based thinking should not limit creativity or prevent exploration of new ideas. Creatives should still feel free to push boundaries and think outside the box, as long as their ideas are rooted in the client's values and goals.

Ultimately, a balance must be struck between creative freedom and strategic thinking to produce effective and impactful work.

To know more about creative ideas, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/1974583#
#SPJ11

The given statement is false.

Alcohol is a leading cause of traffic fatalities ingesting and using kill 28 people an afternoon within the U.S. about one man or woman every 52 mins in keeping with the countrywide toll road visitors protection administration (NHTSA). this is more than 10,000 lives misplaced every 12 months to  driving.

Every day, approximately 32 humans in America die in inebriated-using crashes it truly is one character every 45 minutes. In 2020, 11,654 human beings died in alcohol-impaired driving traffic deaths a 14% growth from 2019.

Learn more about Alcohol here: https://brainly.com/question/947751

#SPJ2

Answer:

Criminally poor.

Explanation:

In medieval times, the power and ability to exercise rights of each person was directly proportional to their wealth: the greater the wealth, the greater the power that this person had regarding their rights, and their ability to act within (and outside) of the law was expanded. On the contrary, low-income people had fewer possibilities of this type, with which their actions were constantly being evaluated by governments.

In this context, in case of crimes, the penalties were much harsher depending on whether they were rich people or poor people. The latter, if convicted, could be tortured or even sentenced to death; penalties that were not applied to people with greater purchasing power.

Answer:

I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION

PLEASE ELABORATE

Answer:

The immediate withdrawal of building a border wall would bring some benefits. First, it would allow people who are asylum seekers to come. Secondly, it would redistribute more resources to the Department of Homeland Security. Finally, it would save the American people millions of dollars.

In contrast, the three cons of not having a border wall would be a possible increase in crime. Secondly, the flood of undocumented persons. Finally, as a country, we would be vulnerable to attack by any of our enemies on the world stage.

Explanation:

I hope this helps you develop your idea further.

Yes, a gang enhancement can be charged as an individual offense in the United States.

Gang enhancements are additional penalties that are added to the sentence of a criminal conviction if the crime is committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with a criminal street gang. These enhancements are intended to deter individuals from joining and participating in criminal street gangs, and to impose harsher penalties on those who do.

As a way of conclusion, in the United States, the exact laws and penalties for gang enhancements vary by state, but they typically include longer prison sentences and increased fines.

Learn more about gang enhancement here: https://brainly.com/question/16915248

#SPJ1

The concept of a surveillance society, where individuals are constantly monitored through various technological means, is becoming increasingly relevant in today's world. With the widespread use of surveillance cameras, social media monitoring, and data collection by both private and government entities, the potential for abuse of this information is a growing concern. While the use of surveillance can help in crime prevention, it can also lead to a violation of privacy and freedom.

Panopticism, a concept developed by philosopher Michel Foucault, refers to a system of surveillance and control where individuals are constantly under watch, whether they know it or not. This system can be used to maintain order and discipline in society, but it also raises ethical questions about the power dynamic between those who are watched and those who are watching.

The prison-industrial complex refers to the relationship between the government and private companies that profit from the incarceration of individuals. This concept has led to the growth of the prison industry, which is often criticized for prioritizing profits over rehabilitation and justice. The arrest-to-prison pipeline is a related concept that describes the process by which individuals, particularly those from marginalized communities, are funneled into the criminal justice system from a young age, often due to factors such as poverty and racial discrimination.

The concept of precrime, made popular by the movie Minority Report, refers to the use of technology to predict and prevent crime before it occurs. While this may seem like a futuristic concept, predictive policing, and risk assessments are already being used in some jurisdictions. However, the use of these technologies raises concerns about bias and discrimination, as well as the potential for innocent individuals to be punished based on their predicted likelihood of committing a crime.

Overall, the technological and moral implications of these concepts are complex and multifaceted. While technological advancements may provide benefits in terms of crime prevention, they also raise serious ethical concerns about privacy, power, and discrimination. It is important to continue to critically examine these concepts and their implementation in society to ensure that they align with our values of justice and equality.

The consent of the governed refers to the idea that a government's legitimacy and moral right to use state power is justified and lawful only when consented to by the people or society over which that political power is exercised.

This concept is a key principle of democracy and is rooted in the idea that governments are created by and for the people.

Without the consent of the governed, a government cannot legitimately exercise power over its citizens. This consent can be given through various means, such as voting in elections or agreeing to a social contract.

It is important for governments to maintain the consent of the governed in order to remain legitimate and maintain their authority.

For more similar questions on consent:

brainly.com/question/21364745

#SPJ11

True. Criminal activity on the Internet differs from criminal activity in the physical world in several ways.

The virtual nature of the Internet allows for unique opportunities and challenges for criminal behavior. Here are some key differences:

Reach and anonymity: The Internet provides a global reach, allowing criminals to target victims from anywhere in the world. Moreover, individuals can engage in criminal activities online while concealing their identities through various techniques, such as using pseudonyms or employing anonymizing tools.

Accessibility and scalability: Criminal activities on the Internet can be easily accessed and scaled up. Cybercriminals can deploy automated tools and techniques to target multiple victims simultaneously, potentially reaching a large number of individuals or organizations within a short period.

Technological sophistication: Cybercriminals often exploit vulnerabilities in computer systems, networks, and software to carry out their activities. This requires a certain level of technical knowledge and expertise that may differ from traditional criminal methods.

Digital evidence and investigations: Criminal activities on the Internet leave behind a trail of digital evidence, which can be valuable in investigations. However, the collection, preservation, and analysis of digital evidence pose unique challenges for law enforcement agencies compared to physical evidence.

Cross-border jurisdiction: The borderless nature of the Internet complicates jurisdictional issues. Criminals can operate from one jurisdiction while targeting victims located in another, making it challenging for law enforcement agencies to effectively investigate and prosecute cybercrimes.

While there are similarities between criminal activities in the physical world and on the Internet, the distinctive characteristics of the digital realm make cybercrime a unique and evolving challenge for law enforcement and society as a whole.

To know more about Digital evidence, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14307842

#SPJ11

An introductory paragraph about "effect of pollution in the society" is that Pollution is a pervasive problem that affects society at large, and its impact is felt in various ways which could be from air pollution, water pollution from industrial waste or agricultural runoff.

Pollution has serious implications for our health, environment, and quality of life. It can lead to respiratory problems, chronic illnesses, and even premature death. Pollution also harms wildlife and ecosystems, and can lead to decreased crop yields and loss of biodiversity.

In addition, pollution disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, such as low-income communities and people of color, who are often exposed to higher levels of pollution due to their proximity to pollution sources. As such, it is crucial that we address pollution and work towards sustainable solutions to mitigate its impact on our society.

Learn more about introductory paragraph at:

https://brainly.com/question/26170049

#SPJ1

Answer:

Africa is a continent with diverse political systems and leadership styles. Since independence, there have been many different types of government in Africa, including one-party states, military dictatorships, and multi-party democracies. Democracy in Africa is marked by political instability, authoritarianism, corruption, and weak institutions. Opposition politics have played an important role in African politics but faced challenges and repression from ruling governments.

Leadership since independence:

Most African countries gained independence from colonial rule in the 1950s and 1960s. The first generation of African leaders was characterized by charismatic figures, such as Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, Julius Nyerere of Tanzania, and Jomo Kenyatta of Kenya. These leaders were committed to the idea of African unity and promoted a vision of socialism and self-reliance. However, many were also accused of corruption, authoritarianism, and human rights abuses.

In the decades following independence, Africa saw a mix of military coups, one-party states, and multi-party democracies. Some leaders, such as Mobutu Sese Seko of Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of Congo), Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe, and Idi Amin of Uganda, became infamous for their brutality and corruption.

Typologies of government:

In the post-independence period, African countries have experimented with various types of government, including one-party states, military dictatorships, and multi-party democracies. One-party states were popular in the early post-independence period, with ruling parties that claimed to represent the entire population. Military coups became common in the 1960s and 1970s, with military leaders taking over governments and suspending constitutional rights. Multi-party democracies emerged in the 1990s, as African countries embraced the wave of democratization that swept the world.

Nature of democracy:

Democracy in Africa is marked by political instability, authoritarianism, corruption, and weak institutions. Many African countries have held elections that were marred by irregularities, violence, and intimidation. Opposition parties and civil society have faced challenges from ruling governments, including censorship, harassment, and arrest. Corruption has also been a major problem in many African democracies, with leaders using state resources for personal gain.

Opposition politics:

Opposition politics have played an important role in African politics but have often faced challenges and repression from ruling governments. Opposition parties have been accused of being funded by foreign powers or seeking to destabilize the government. Opposition leaders have been subjected to harassment, arrest, and imprisonment. However, opposition politics have also been successful in some African countries, leading to democratic reforms and the overthrow of authoritarian regimes.

Relationship with erstwhile colonial powers:

The relationship between African countries and their former colonial powers has been marked by a history of exploitation, conflict, and tension. Some African leaders have accused former colonial powers of perpetuating poverty, inequality, and instability on the continent. There have also been disagreements over issues such as trade, aid, and human rights. However, some African countries have also maintained close ties with their former colonial powers, including economic and political partnerships.

Explanation:

True. If a contract term is ambiguous, a court may interpret the ambiguity against the party who drafted the term.

This is known as the "contra proferentem" rule, which means that any ambiguity in a contract should be interpreted against the party who drafted the contract. The rationale behind this rule is that the party who drafted the contract had the opportunity to clarify any ambiguities but failed to do so.

Additionally, if a term in a contract is ambiguous, a court may consider extrinsic evidence to help interpret the term. Extrinsic evidence can include things like prior negotiations, course of performance, or trade usage. The goal is to understand the intent of the parties when they entered into the contract, and to give effect to that intent to the extent possible.

To know more about ambiguity click here:

brainly.com/question/15222669

#SPJ4

Answer: B

Explanation:

The term precedent refers to a court decision that serves as a guide for handling similar legal questions or cases with the same or comparable facts in the future.

A court decision used as a guide for the future is known as a judicial precedent. This is known as stare decisis (Latin for standing on a ruling), and it establishes precedents as authoritative, conclusive, and deserving of adherence. A court decision used as a guide for future judgement is known as a judicial precedent. As persuasion is a major component of the courtroom, social influence can have a significant impact on the choices that lawyers, judges, and jurors make. This essay offers solutions to the who, what, when, where, why, and how issues to give lawyers more assurance when deciding whether to settle or go to trial.

Learn more about persuasion here:

https://brainly.com/question/14520999

#SPJ4

The advancements that can be made to improve your chosen area going forward for the next 20 years are known by research into the missing links in your field.

This is further explained below.

Generally, Your field of study should ideally be relevant to your intended future career path and be capable of making a possible contribution to the realization of your desired professional outcomes.

Many students tend to grossly underestimate how important it is to identify a pertinent study subject that is suitable for their dissertation.  It is not possible to make a hasty choice about this matter.

In conclusion, Research into the gaps that exist in your industry has shown the potential improvements that may be made to your chosen sector moving ahead over the next 20 years.

Read more about your area of study

https://brainly.com/question/13175153

#SPJ1

Answer:

c. tender

Explanation:

In the context of the law, this would be known as a tender. These offers are made by one party and agreed upon by the other, usually to settle a dispute or a contract. These offers can range from a wide variety of obligations such as an act, a forfeiture of a property or asset, or in most cases a certain amount of money. In most cases, when the offer is completed by the accepting party the contract is completed.

Answer:

Explanation:

Advocacy refers to the act of publicly supporting a particular cause or issue, and protestors in advocacy campaigns should avoid using violence during their protests due to safety concerns, legal repercussions, and negative public perception.

Any action that promotes, urges, justifies, defends, or pleads on behalf of another person is referred to as advocacy.

Getting support from another individual to help you communicate your opinions and wishes and help you stand up for your rights is referred to as advocacy.

Your advocate is a person who supports you in this way. There are a number of reasons why protestors participating in an advocacy campaign should refrain from using violence. The three are security, legitimacy, and legality. By supplying policymakers with the data they need to make decisions and, in turn, influence legislation, advocates can have significant positive effects on the puiblic's health. Effective advocacy does not necessarily require protracted or complicated legislative procedure.

Therefore, we can conclude that advocacy is when person pleads on behalf of another.

Learn more about Advocacy here:

https://brainly.com/question/29639066

#SPJ5

Community policing is one of the major ways of combating crimes in this 21st century south Africa. This is because the job of policing is carried out by members of the community and they know and are well knowledgeable about the community and its members.

The Key concept of Community policing is centered on the core values of policing. they include the following

The origin of community policing was dated back to the 20th century in South Africa. Its major aim was to create a synergy and bond between members of the community and law enforcement.

The Goals of community policing is centered around protecting the fundamental rights to liberty, equality and justice under the law of the local communities. To fulfil this privileged role, the police must be a part of the communities they serve.

Learn more about Community Policing at https://brainly.com/question/3177078

#SPJ1

Answer:

vetoing a bill passed by congress should be Legislative Branch

pardoning people convicted of federal crime is Judicial Branch

nominating justices to the supreme court could be Legislative Branch but I don't fully know

Answer:

Explanation:

20*2.5=50

50/2=25

2.5% of 25 is 0.625

To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.

Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.

The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.

It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.

To learn about Tax Abuse visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28337521

#SPJ4

Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?

The primary sources of public law include statutes and penal law.

Public law is the part of law that governs relations between legal persons and a government, between different institutions within a state, between different branches of governments, as well as relationships between persons that are of direct concern to society. Public law comprises constitutional law, administrative law, tax law and criminal law, as well as all procedural law. Laws concerning relationships between individuals belong to private law.

To know more about constitutional  law :

https://brainly.com/question/14918421

#SPJ11