Populism arises when citizens are frustrated with politics that are focused on the needs and interests are it has institutions such as a parliament, prime minister, or other public officials.
It is frequently associated with anti-established order and anti-political sentiment. The term developed inside the late nineteenth century and has been applied to numerous politicians, events and movements considering that that point, frequently as a pejorative.
The Populist motion changed into a rise up through farmers within the South and Midwest in opposition to the Democratic and Republican events for ignoring their pastimes and difficulties. For over a decade, farmers had been suffering from crop disasters, falling charges, negative advertising, and lack of credit score facilities.
Farmers inside the South and Midwest revolted against the Democratic and Republican parties for ignoring their concerns and issues, resulting in the Populist movement. Charismatic or influential figures who gift themselves as the "voice of the people" regularly lead
They demanded an increase within the circulating forex (to be executed by the limitless coinage of silver), a graduated earnings tax, authorities possession of the railroads, a tariff for sales simplest, the direct election of U.S. senators, and different measures designed to bolster political democracy and deliver farmers .
Learn more about Populism arises here
https://brainly.com/question/11716977
#SPJ4
How does social change happen?
Answer:
social change happens by getting into a relationship, having a friend, new electronics
Explanation:
A key element of the corpus delicti of a crime is the identity of the person who committed it. True or False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
The ability to vote is one of the most important rights in a democracy. People should be able to vote easily, and voting laws should be written to make sure that the largest number of people are able to vote. Voting stations should be easy to get to and should be open early enough so that everyone has time to vote.
Answer:
that's true
Explanation:
in all the questionnaire as already stated it all, electorate should be allowed to exercise their franchise because that's one of the right a citizen of a state or country is entitled to
Your testing policies are not meant to discriminate against women, but
women pass your tests at significantly lower rates than men. The test you
are giving has not been professionally developed...indeed, you thought of
random "feats of strength" and not about the particular job at all. Because
you do not intend to discriminate against women, or any other protected
group, there are no employment discrimination claims that can be brought
against you.
True or false.
Even if you did not mean to be intentional in your discrimination against women, employment discrimination suits can still be brought so this is false.
When can discrimination suits be brought?As long as there is discrimination of women or other protected groups, discrimination suits can be brought.
Discrimination does not have to be intentional or unintentional. The law simply wants to know if there was discrimination. If there was, it is illegal and the intention doesn't count there.
The intention will however count in sentencing and you might receive a lesser punishment for not knowing that you were engaging in discrimination.
Find out more on discrimination at https://brainly.com/question/1084594
#SPJ1
What do police officers construction workers in school crossing guards have in common
Answer:
Police officers, construction workers, [ and school crossing guards have in common that: they all must sometimes work near traffic AND they are all at higher risk from impaired drivers. ]
MIRTs are required to adopt and follow the NSCMIRTP Act to be registered with the College and employed as an MIRT in Nova Scotia. What does the NSCMIRTP Act work to accomplish?
Establish and promote standards of practice for registrants
All answers are correct
Establish and promote a Code of Ethics for the profession
Serve and protect the public interest in the practice of the profession
Regulate the practice of MIRTs and govern college registrants
The NSCMIRTP Act works to accomplish all of the mentioned objectives. The Option B is correct.
What objectives does the NSCMIRTP Act aim to achieve?The NSCMIRTP Act aims to achieve multiple objectives related to the practice of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy Professionals (MIRTs) in Nova Scotia.
Its maily seeks to establish and promote standards of practice for registrants, ensuring that MIRTs adhere to a set of guidelines and best practices. This helps maintain a high level of professionalism and quality of care within the profession.
Its create a code that serves as a framework for ethical conduct, guiding MIRTs in their interactions with patients, colleagues, and the broader healthcare community.
Read more about NSCMIRTP Act
brainly.com/question/23753695
#SPJ1
The NSCMIRTP Act aims to establish and promote standards of practice, a Code of Ethics, and public protection while regulating the practice of MIRTs and governing college registrants in Nova Scotia.
What is the NSCMIRTP Act?The NSCMIRTP Act, or the Nova Scotia Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy Professionals Act, works to accomplish several objectives. All of the answers provided are correct and align with the goals of the
The acts Establish and promote a Code of Ethics for the profession. The Act seeks to develop and enforce a Code of Ethics for MIRT professionals in Nova Scotia. This code outlines the ethical principles and guidelines that practitioners must adhere to in their professional conduct, ensuring ethical behavior and patient care.
Learn more about NSCMIRTP Act at https://brainly.com/question/160018
#SPJ1
TRUE/FALSE. seriousness of offebse abd orior record of the defendant atre the most important factors on determing normal penalties
The offense's seriousness The most significant factors in determining standard penalties were the defendant's prior history and behavior. True.
What elements are taken into account while imposing a punishment on a defendant?A judge must impose a sentence that is adequate—but not excessive—to reflect the seriousness of the offense, encourage adherence to the law, provide just punishment for the crime, effectively deter future criminal behavior, safeguard the public from the defendant's further criminal activity, and provide for the defendant.
What are the two main criteria that judges use to determine sentences?When deciding how long to sentence a convicted offender to, federal courts look to the sentencing guidelines. The guidelines offer sentence ranges based on the severity of the offense and the criminal record of the defendant.
To Know more about standard penalties
https://brainly.com/question/24112840
#SPJ4
Is it illegal to murder someone
Answer:
No it depends on how you do it self defense its legal just to do it its illegal
Explanation:
3. What events caused
the expansion of
national power in the
twentieth century?
Answer:
the Southern states had tried to secede from the united states due to disagreements on slavery in the stated which then let to one of the biggest events which was the civil war.
Explanation:
Is interest earned income?
☁️ Answer ☁️
I don't understand.. but here:
The interest that is earned on those investments over a period of time is considered income.
Hope it helps.
Have a nice day noona/hyung!~  ̄▽ ̄❤️
Insurance Contracts
Chapter Exam 2
beralization, Subrogation, and Other Insurance are all found in which section of a property or casualty insurance policy?
A Insuring Agreement
B
9
Exclusions
Conditions
Declarations
Liberalization, subrogation, and other insurance clauses are typically found in the General Provisions section of a property or casualty insurance policy, which sets forth the overall framework and requirements of the policy.
The provisions of liberalization, subrogation, and other insurance clauses are typically found in the General Provisions section of a property or casualty insurance policy.
This section sets forth the overall framework and requirements of the policy and is often located at the beginning of the policy document.
The General Provisions section typically includes definitions of key terms, general agreements between the insurer and the insured, conditions that apply to the policy, exclusions from coverage, and other provisions that apply to the policy as a whole.
Subrogation provisions allow the insurer to take legal action against third parties to recover the cost of claims paid to the insured, while other insurance clauses specify how multiple insurance policies covering the same risk will interact with each other.
The liberalization clause ensures that policyholders benefit from any changes to state or federal laws that increase coverage without additional premium payments.
To know more about Insurance visit :
brainly.com/question/989103
#SPJ1
An important duty of the president is
appointing senators.
O addressing ingress.
O creating laws.
O funding the military.
Answer:
Addressing Congress
Explanation:
I'm going to guess that there are 4 questions.
The President does not appoint senators, they are elected by the people of a state.
The President does not create laws, that is up to the Legislative Branch of Congress.
The President does not fund the military, Congress funds the military.
The answer here is
B. Addressing Congress.
Provide a substantive and thoughtful commentary that reflects on
something learned about the federal judiciary
The federal judiciary is the judicial branch of the federal government. It comprises of the Supreme Court and the lesser federal courts that Congress established. The Supreme Court and the High Court are the only courts with the authority to decide on rights under the federal legal system.
An organized community is regulated by a structure or a collection of people, frequently a state. In the case of its broad associative definition, government typically comprises of the legislative, executive, and judicial departments. Government serves as both a mechanism for formulating and enforcing organizational policy. In many countries, a statement outlining the principles and philosophy of the government serves as the equivalent of a constitution.
Even though all entities have governance, the word "government" is commonly used to more specifically refer to the approximately 200 distinct national governments and related institutions. Between these two fundamental subcategories of contemporary political systems are democracies, totalitarian regimes, and authoritarian regimes with a variety of hybrid regimes.
Learn more about government here:
brainly.com/question/4160287
#SPJ4
The court will reduce the plaintiff's award by his or her own percentage of fault. * True False Legislation is available pertaining to sole proprietorship and also may need to obtain business license and register trade name. True False Articles of Incorporation are filed separately with Notice of Directors and Notice of Address. True False The statutory definition of partnership covers people who expressly intend to be partners as well as people who may not necessarily intend to be partners but act as if they are partners. True False
1. True
It is true that the court reduces the plaintiff's award by his or her own percentage of fault. This is known as comparative negligence.
2. True
It is true that legislation is available pertaining to sole proprietorship and also may need to obtain a business license and register the trade name.
3. False
It is false that articles of incorporation are filed separately with Notice of Directors and Notice of Address.
4. True
It is true that the statutory definition of partnership covers people who expressly intend to be partners as well as people who may not necessarily intend to be partners but act as if they are partners.
To know more about proprietorship visit:
brainly.com/question/32997613
#SPJ11
Isabelle found shell casings at the secondary crime scene. What type of evidence does this BEST represent?
Answer:
A weapon was used at the scene
what is significant about the ruling of US v. Cruikshank (1876)?
The ruling of US v. Cruikshank (1876) is significant because it had a major impact on the civil rights movement. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment did not apply to states, but only to the federal government.
This ruling effectively made it more difficult for the federal government to protect the rights of black citizens in the South, particularly in regards to their right to vote and their ability to own firearms. As a result, it became more difficult for African Americans to defend themselves against violence and intimidation from white supremacists. The Cruikshank ruling set the stage for decades of discrimination and oppression against black Americans, and it wasn't until the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s that significant progress was made in overturning its harmful effects.
The significant aspect of the ruling in US v. Cruikshank (1876) is that it limited the federal government's ability to protect the civil rights of African Americans, by stating that the 14th and 15th Amendments only applied to state actions, not individual actions. This ruling weakened the enforcement of civil rights, allowing for the rise of white supremacist groups and perpetuating racial discrimination in the post-Civil War era.
learn more about rule here
https://brainly.com/question/19672031
#SPJ11
If the defense claims that your testimony does not agree with that of other officers, you should amend your testimony to eliminate possible jury perceptions of a disorganized and ineffective police department.
If the defense claims that your testimony does not align with that of other officers, it is not advisable to amend your testimony solely to eliminate potential jury perceptions of a disorganized and ineffective police department.
As a witness, your primary duty is to provide truthful and accurate testimony based on your personal knowledge and observations. Tampering with or altering your testimony to artificially align with other officers' statements can compromise the integrity of the legal process and undermine the pursuit of justice.
While it is essential for law enforcement agencies to maintain consistency and credibility in their investigations and testimonies, it should not come at the expense of truthfulness. It is the responsibility of the defense and prosecution to present their respective cases, and the jury's task is to evaluate the evidence and testimonies provided.
If your testimony differs from that of other officers due to genuine differences in observations or recollections, it is important to explain those differences honestly and provide any relevant context or reasoning.
It is up to the jury to weigh the credibility and reliability of witnesses and their testimonies when reaching a verdict. Attempting to amend your testimony solely for the purpose of presenting a unified front can be seen as unethical and may have serious legal consequences.
Learn more about testimony here :
https://brainly.com/question/32360114
#SPJ11
Why are police officers often reluctant to get mental health counseling, and how are police departments attempting to make it easier for officers to get help when it is needed?
Answer: 1: concerns about confidentiality in the department, 2:not believing psychologists understood their line of work, and 3: feeling like they are not fit for duty.
Explanation:
what does waiving your right to a speedy trial mean?
You must consent to the trial proceeding more slowly than is allowed by state law in order to surrender your right to a speedy trial.
The Sixth Amendment as well as various state laws provide the right to a speedy trial. Many defendants, especially those who are being held and waiting in jail, want to use this right. However, lawyers frequently advise their clients to "waive time"—that is, consent to the processes taking longer than what is permitted by state law.
In all criminal cases, the defendant is entitled to a prompt trial under the US Constitution. The speedy trial promise requires that the accused be either tried or released within a reasonable period of time.
To learn more about speedy trial
https://brainly.com/question/30284056
#SPJ4
what happens with illegally seized evidence in juvenile proceedings?
In juvenile proceedings, illegally seized evidence is handled differently than in adult court. If evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence.
An illegal seizure is a search or seizure by law enforcement without a valid warrant or without reasonable suspicion. An officer is required to have reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, before conducting a search or seizure. A search or seizure may be considered illegal if it violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, including the police. It applies to both adults and juveniles.
If the evidence is obtained illegally, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings. The rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and ensure that law enforcement officers do not violate their rights.In summary, if evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings.
To know more about proceedings:
https://brainly.com/question/29791715
#SPJ11
What have you done to prepare for a career in Law Enforcement?
I need help for a job application!!!! Please give me a Answer for this!
Okay,
I have completed a Bachelor of Arts in Criminology and Criminal Justice, and I am currently completing a Graduate Diploma in Legal Studies.
Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 states that its purpose, in part, is to require that real estate appraisals used in connection with federally related transactions be performed ______.
Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 requires real estate appraisals used in federal government transactions to be completed in writing and to uniform standards.
What exactly is the 1989 Enforcement Act?
The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) is a law passed in 1989 in response to the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s that revised the federal government agency structure and rules governing the United States savings and loan banking system and the real estate appraisal industry. The following are some of the major changes brought about by the law:
Regulations to ensure that real estate appraisals are properly performed. This includes the need for complete and accurate documentation, as well as training for appraisers and their supervisors.The Resolution Trust Corp. was established temporarily to resolve the status of the nation's failed savings and loan institutions.The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation was abolished, and two funds of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation were established: the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF) to cover S&Ls, and the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) to cover banks.The Federal Home Loan Bank Board was abolished, and two new agencies were established to replace it: the Federal Housing Finance Board (FHFB) and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS).Learn more about the Enforcement Act with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14620330
#SPJ1
Which of the following best illustrates a consequence of the debate about the merits of democracy and non-democracy with respect to economic development?
A. the governments of the developing world refusing to trade with the non-democratic state of China in the 1990s because of China's human rights policies
B. the IMF and World Bank lending heavily to Singapore and South Korea in the 1970s in spite of existing claims of human rights violations
C. the policies of the World Bank that endorsed and supported the command economies of the Soviet Union and its satellites in the 1980s
D. the U.S. government sending troops to the non-democratic states of Iraq and Afghanistan as part of the global war on international terrorism
B. the IMF and World Bank lending heavily to Singapore and South Korea in the 1970s in spite of existing claims of human rights violations best illustrates a consequence of the debate about the merits of democracy and non-democracy with respect to economic development.
The lending decisions of the IMF and World Bank to Singapore and South Korea in the 1970s illustrate the consequences of the debate about the merits of democracy and non-democracy with respect to economic development. Despite concerns about human rights violations in these countries, the IMF and World Bank chose to support their economic development through loans and aid programs. This decision reflected the belief that economic growth and development could be achieved even in non-democratic regimes. This example highlights the tension between democratic values and economic development goals, and the difficult choices that international organizations and governments must make when considering whether to support non-democratic regimes.
Learn more about economic here:
https://brainly.com/question/14787713
#SPJ11
which is not a change made to hipaa by the omnibus rule of 2013?
It did not introduce the following change: Expansion of the types of covered entities, Enhanced patient rights, etc.
The Omnibus Rule of 2013 made several changes to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulations to strengthen privacy and security protections for protected health information. However, it did not introduce the following change:
Expansion of the types of covered entities: The Omnibus Rule did not expand the types of entities covered by HIPAA. The original HIPAA regulations already defined covered entities, such as healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses.
The actual changes made by the Omnibus Rule include:
Extending HIPAA obligations to business associates: The Omnibus Rule expanded HIPAA's requirements to include business associates of covered entities. Business associates are now directly liable for complying with certain HIPAA provisions.
Strengthening breach notification requirements: The rule modified and enhanced the breach notification requirements, including lowering the threshold for reporting breaches, clarifying the assessment of breach risk, and specifying the content and timing of breach notifications.
Enhanced patient rights: The rule enhanced individual rights under HIPAA, such as the right to access and obtain copies of their health information, the right to request restrictions on certain disclosures, and the right to receive electronic copies of their health records.
Increased enforcement and penalties: The Omnibus Rule strengthened enforcement of HIPAA regulations and increased the penalties for non-compliance. It aligned HIPAA penalties with the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act's tiered penalty structure.
Updated requirements for business associate agreements: The rule introduced specific provisions that must be included in business associate agreements, including provisions related to safeguarding protected health information and complying with HIPAA regulations.
These changes aimed to improve privacy and security protections for individuals' health information and to ensure that both covered entities and their business associates are held accountable for HIPAA compliance.
To know more about Accountability Act (HIPAA), click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28250318
#SPJ11
"How did the British reaction to the Colonists' protests change
over time from the Stamp Act (1765) to the Intolerable Acts
(1774)?
Please answer it will be 50 points!
which nims command and coordination structures are offsite locations
One of the four NIMS Command and Coordination structures are emergency operations centers.
EOCs are off-site sites where workers from many agencies get together to: Address immediate threats and dangers. ICS is used to oversee on-scene, tactical-level reaction. The National Incident Management System (NIMS) provides direction for collaboration among all tiers of government, nongovernmental groups, and the corporate sector in order to avoid, defend against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from incidents. By balancing flexibility and standardization, NIMS provides a framework for interoperability and compatibility. In order to manage domestic incidents, the government and the private sector can collaborate through the flexible framework offered by NIMS. The organizational structure of the State Operational Center (SOC) under NIMS corresponds to the fundamental ICS functions. ICS, on the other hand, is a tactical communications system that is field-based, whereas NIMS offers a framework for controlling the event at the local, operating area, region, and state levels.
Learn more about NIMS here
https://brainly.com/question/11121182
#SPJ4
What can be done to foster police-community cooperation in combating crime?
In order to foster police-community cooperation in combating crime, the three important components of community policing strategies are organizational transformation, community partnerships, and shared problem-solving.
What is the role of police-community cooperation in combating crime?Building trust between the police and the community is dependent on positive police-community interactions. Police work becomes far less successful without this trust.
Basically, attempts to make this information more available go a long way because the public needs to know what the police are up to. The police department's openness is improved through posting police reports and other public records on the agency website, having a noticeable physical presence, and hosting open-forum community debates.
Therefore, organizational transformation, community partnerships, and shared problem-solving can foster police-community cooperation in combating crime.
Learn more about police-community cooperation, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9253874
#SPJ2
Do you think the media or public judged OJ Simpson before the jury did?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
When people hear something they like to instantly believe that thing and start hating them.
Utilitarian approach O a. accounts for values such as justice and individual rights O b. None of the given statements O c. says with certainty whether the consequences of our actions will be good or bad O d. It is not the most common approach to moral reasoning used in business because of the way in which it accounts for costs and benefits
An effective claim for an argumentative essay is
Answer:
An effective claim in an 'argumentative essay' is a true statement that can be proven using 'facts and cannot be countered'Hence, effective claim in an argumentative essay will be a true statement which is not hypothetical and can be proved with the help of evidences and facts.
Explanation:
the facts and data that support a statement of opinion in the text. the statement that takes a position on an issue or controversy. the explanation of how the evidence in the text supports a reason. the quotations from primary sources that are used to validate a fact.
have a good day