Plz I need help plz

It should be noted that the above essay is an expository essay. An expository essay is one that analyses an event or an idea. See the sample required as per the above prompt.

Note that the relationship between the U.S. government and Native American groups has evolved over time. During the colonialism period, Native American lands were often seized by European settlers. The U.S. Constitution did not originally recognize Native American groups as sovereign nations, treating them instead as dependent nations.

As the U.S. expanded its settlements westward, Native American lands were increasingly threatened. Many Native American tribes were forcibly relocated to reservations. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the U.S. government sought to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream American society through programs such as the Indian boarding school system.

Currently, the U.S. government has a complex relationship with Native American tribes. Native American tribes are considered sovereign nations and have the right to self-governance. However, they must also adhere to federal laws and regulations. The U.S. government also provides funding for the improvement of Native American communities.

Overall, the relationship between the U.S. government and Native American groups has been fraught with conflict and mistreatment. While the current relationship is improved, Native American tribes still face challenges in asserting their sovereignty and improving their communities.

Learn more about expository essays:
https://brainly.com/question/6563076
#SPJ1

Answer:

trade in energy resources

Explanation:

russia is a big oil producer

Answer:

New Netherland was the first Dutch colony in North America. It extended from Albany, New York, in the north to Delaware in the south and encompassed parts of what are now the states of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Connecticut, and Delaware.

Explanation:

Answer:

c. Dutch

Explanation:

Answer: The military could cross the sea, and the mountains helped protect Rome

HOPE THIS HELPS

Answer:

GG

Explanation:

We pick question number 2.

Interest groups & political parties shape American politics in that both are powerful and influential groups that are led by smart leaders who have convictions and have tried to influence the public opinion of the American people throughout history.

Their presence has marked significant moments in important decisions that have shaped the history of the United States.

However, we have to say both groups are different in nature and use different techniques. Let's say they are different in nature.

> Political parties are formed by a group of people with similar approaches to political life and create platforms aimed to help the conditions of the citizens.

> The two most dominant political parties in the United States are the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.

> US citizens vote for their candidates to be their representatives in US Congress and create important laws based on people's needs and concerns.

> On the other hand, the main purpose of interest groups is to influence Congressmen to create the kind of legislation that can favor their political and economic interests.

> Many times, these interest groups hire the services of lobbyists to negotiate with legislators in Washington D.C.

Some examples of interest groups in the United States are:

- the American Bankers Association.

- the United Farm Workers of America.

- the National Association of Manufacturers.

Learn more about this topic here:

https://brainly.com/question/21671685?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

Rome is your answer

Explanation:

hope it help you

politicians and pundits often warn us away from greater cooperation across national borders. You hear how free trade hurts workers. You hear that trading partners take advantage of one another. And you hear that we are losing to China or India, or whichever country fits this narrative best on any given day.  

We are told we can fix these problems by turning inward. Buy only home-grown products. Shy away from trade deals. Punish partners with high tariffs. Shut the door on neighbors.

Yet the growth of our economy is linked to the global marketplace. In particular, our close relationships strengthen our domestic economy. And nowhere is this more true than in North America, which remains one of the world’s most competitive economic platforms. An economically vibrant North America, and the continued cooperation, interconnection, and integration of the American, Mexican, and Canadian economies, is fundamental to our shared success.

An economically vibrant North America, and the continued cooperation, interconnection, and integration of the American, Mexican, and Canadian economies, is fundamental to our shared success.

North America on display in San Diego/Tijuana

But we must keep building these relationships to keep growing and thriving. For that reason, the Bush Institute’s North America Working Group has been meeting to identify ways to make North America more competitive.  

In fact, earlier this year we spent two days touring projects along the San Diego/Tijuana border. We made the trip to see how closer economic relations among the three nations of North America can produce growth that benefits citizens and consumers on both sides of the border.  

As part of the tour, we visited the Cross Border Xpress airport terminal. To the delight of San Diego residents, the sky bridge provides an alternative that cuts the border crossing time to a mere three minutes.

For years, San Diego residents had used the Tijuana International Airport when traveling to destinations where service from the San Diego International Airport was not convenient. The decision was entirely rational, but it also involved an extra 45 minutes or more of travel. Crossing the U.S./Mexico border by car took at least that long.  

Then came the building of the Cross Border Xpress terminal in 2015. The facility is located in San Diego and connected to Tijuana International Airport via a pedestrian bridge. For a small fee, San Diego-based passengers can park on the U.S. side, pass through the necessary immigration and customs checks for both countries, cross the border on the sky bridge, process through airport security, and continue to their flight.

Something as simple as a sky bridge highlights the underlying strength of the communities that we share along our borders.  

Something as simple as a sky bridge highlights the underlying strength of the communities that we share along our borders.

In fact, that is the more important story here.  The Cross Border Xpress, which is privately-owned by Mexican and American investors, serves this cross-border community in an innovative, practical way. This kind of public-private relationship represents the future of economic cooperation along the border.

https://www.bushcenter.org/catalyst/north-american-century/canada-mexico-us-need-each-other.html

i'm not able to type the balance of the answer so pls go to

Answer:

no not really however you cannot have a call to action where it can lead to negative affects on others

Answer:

This kind of eurocentric thought deprives human history of key information by deleting Africa´s role as the birthplace of human and civilized life.

It´s also the basis for racism in the present.

Moreover, it disregards the great influence of African religions and scientific ideas.

Explanation:

The eurocentric disregard of Africa as the cradle of ancient Egyptian civilization, a key element to understand human development, leads to a faulty recollection of human history

It´s also the foundation of racist conceptions that served slavery and are still damaging to society in the present.

Furthermore, it erases the profound influence of Africa´s religious ideas and scientific concepts in European philosophy and technological advancement.

Answer:

Carl Bert Albert (May 10, 1908 – February 4, 2000) was an American lawyer and politician who served as the 46th speaker of the United States House of Representatives from 1971 to 1977 and represented Oklahoma's 3rd congressional district as a Democrat from 1947 to 1977.

Explanation:

Answer:

nomad i think

Explanation:

The parliament passed the Intolerable Acts, the Stamp Act Congress was initiated by American colonists who also destroyed tea in Boston Harbor and the parliament passed the stamp act.

The Boston Tea Party, a demonstration of colonial resistance in which American colonists under the leadership of the Sons of Liberty destroyed tea in Boston Harbor, prompted the British Parliament to enact a number of laws known as the Intolerable Acts. The Acts were created with the intention of punishing the colonists and further enforcing British rule over them.

The Stamp Act, on the other hand, was a law that colonists had to pay a tax on printed materials like newspapers, legal documents, and playing cards. It was passed by Parliament in 1765.

The colonists opposed this law because they believed it violated their rights as British subjects. The Stamp Act Congress was a gathering of colonial representatives who wrote a petition to Parliament in protest, was held in response.

The question is incomplete, complete question will be "Match each action to either the American colonists or Parliament.

* Passed the Intolerable Acts

* Met at the Stamp Act Congress

* Destroyed tea in Boston Harbor

* Passed the Stamp Act

Learn more about American colonists at:

brainly.com/question/192718

#SPJ1

Answer:

A,B,D,E

Explanation:

i did this and got it correct

Answer:A,B,D,E

Explanation: The guy above me is right

the term "muckraker" has a positive connotation, as it refers to individuals who worked to bring about social change and hold those in power accountable for their actions. While the term was initially used as a Pejorative by President Roosevelt

Based on the timeline, the term "muckraker" refers to individuals who worked as journalists or writers during the Progressive Era (1890s-1920s) to expose corruption and social injustices in American society. The term was coined by President Theodore Roosevelt in 1906, who criticized some journalists for being too critical and sensationalist in their reporting.

Muckrakers were known for their investigative reporting, which often exposed misconduct and wrongdoing in government, business, and other institutions. They used their writing to bring attention to social problems such as poverty, inequality, and labor exploitation, and their work helped to spur reform movements and changes in public policy.

Some well-known muckrakers from this era include Upton Sinclair, who wrote The Jungle, an exposé on the meatpacking industry, and Ida Tarbell, who wrote a series of articles exposing the monopolistic practices of the Standard Oil Company. Other notable muckrakers included Lincoln Steffens, Jacob Riis, and Ray Stannard Baker.

for more such questions on Pejorative

https://brainly.com/question/3710220

#SPJ11

Answer:a

Explanation:a

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although the official charges against Socrates are clear, there are deeper reasons he is being persecuted by his Athenian enemies.

The deeper reasons why Socrates was persecuted were the following. Powerful people from Athens felt threatened. Socrates was a wise man that had a big influence over the young Athenian students, and that was risky for the powerful ones.

Socrates taught his students to use logic to think so they could never be manipulated. And that was another big risk for the powerful ones. He empowered his students to believe in them, not in the Greek Gods.

That is why he was accused of impiety and for corrupting the young Athenians.

The lesson I can draw from my interpretation about the troubles people face when they are committed to speaking the truth is that weak people, I mean insecure, felt that the truth can be a threat to the way things are or the power they exert.

The worst thing for the powers that want to control and exert influence is another individual who teaches other people to use their own mind to think logically because by doing that, people can be conscious of inequities and injustices and can rebel against the established power.

Answer: D

Explanation:

Answer:

ensure that people’s rights were protected. i think

Answer:

D) ensure that people’s rights were protected

Explanation:

e2021

In 1846 the new territory of the United States that was acquired as a result of the Mexican war only be open to settlement by Wilmot Proviso.

The US Congress approved a resolution in 1846 known as the Wilmot Proviso that outlawed slavery in territories that the US had annexed from Mexico as a result of the Mexican-American War.

The Wilmot Proviso failed in the Senate despite having the support of both parties and receiving a resounding majority of support from northerners and finally being ratified by both parties in the House. On August 8, 1846, Congressman David Wilmot of Pennsylvania proposed a $2,000,000 spending measure in the House of Representatives, which contained the Wilmot Proviso. Slavery was meant to be rendered illegal in the regions that were annexed from Mexico, thus it is inferred that this is the case in this instance.

Learn more about Wilmot Proviso at

https://brainly.com/question/29455428

#SPJ4

Answer:

Based on the First Amendment we can infer that the Founding Fathers of the United States had a classical liberal ideological conception.

Thus, the Founding Fathers believed in the right to liberty as the fundamental pillar on which to organize the society and politics of the United States. So, the government must respect the freedom of citizens, who in turn can exercise their freedoms (of expression, religion, etc.) without any limitation by the government or any other citizen.

It's A.

I got it correct on my test

Malenkov's comparison of the US leader to Hitler likely stems from a combination of political motivations and historical parallels.

Malenkov's comparison is likely stems from perceiving authoritarian tendencies or policies in the US leader reminiscent of Hitler's regime.
To provide some context, Georgy Malenkov was a prominent Soviet politician who served as the Chairman of the Council of Ministers (the equivalent of the Prime Minister) in the Soviet Union during the early 1950s.

Comparing the US leader to Hitler could be seen as a rhetorical strategy employed by Malenkov to delegitimize and criticize the policies and actions of the US government. By drawing a parallel to Hitler, who is universally condemned for his authoritarianism, aggression, and human rights abuses, Malenkov is likely attempting to paint the US leader as similarly dangerous and unjust.

Moreover, Malenkov may be leveraging historical events to support his comparison. In the aftermath of World War II, the Soviet Union and the United States emerged as the two superpowers engaged in a Cold War, marked by ideological and geopolitical tensions. The rhetoric of comparing leaders to Hitler was not uncommon during this period, as both sides sought to portray their opponents as the embodiment of evil.

It is important to note that the comparison made by Malenkov should be understood in the context of political rhetoric and propaganda, rather than as a purely objective assessment. Such comparisons can be subjective and reflect the biases and interests of the person making them.

Know more about the political motivations here:
https://brainly.com/question/11740845

#SPJ8

Answer:

Members of the Ku Klux Klan ( KKK ) had attacked Abram Colby savagely in 1869 in an attempt to end his political activities as a Radical Republican, after earlier efforts to bribe the black legislator had failed. Colby, permanently injured by the assault which had nearly killed him, defied intimidation to remain active in eastern Georgia politics.

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Winston Churchill is said to have stated that "History is written by the victors." He meant that those who won the battle had the right to define the story, even though it may have been different from the reality.

First and foremost, Japan would have portrayed its assault on Pearl Harbor as a significant victory. They would have depicted the bombing of the US naval base as a resounding victory against the enemy. They may have portrayed the assault as an act of retribution for US encroachment into their territory. They may have even portrayed it as a means to liberate Hawaii's Japanese residents, who they may have claimed were being treated unfairly by the US government.

It's impossible to predict the specifics of how Japan would have portrayed the assault on Pearl Harbor to its people had it been successful, but it's possible that they would have distorted the facts to suit their needs. Japan's approach to recording its own history is known as historiography. Its historians have been accused of concealing or distorting historical facts to make them more acceptable to the general public.

This approach is referred to as "Nihonjinron" in Japan. It's a way of emphasizing Japan's exceptionalism and uniqueness, as well as its separation from the rest of the world. While this technique of history may have been used to portray Japan as a hero, it is more likely to have fueled the nation's aggressive behavior.

Know more about  historiography here:

https://brainly.com/question/11744737

#SPJ8

Nontheistic means that they lack belief in gods, so basically I think they don't believe in gods but they still pray.

I don't know if it's right, forgive me if I'm wrong :/

The Age of Exploration, which occurred from the 15th to the 17th centuries, played a significant role in European involvement in the African slave trade. Here are some key points to understand this connection:

New World Colonization: The exploration and subsequent colonization of the Americas by European powers created a demand for a large labor force to work in plantations, mines, and other industries. The indigenous populations of the Americas proved inadequate for meeting this demand, leading to the search for alternative sources of labor.

Demand for African Labor: European explorers and traders encountered African societies during their voyages, and they recognized the existence of established slave systems in various African regions. African slaves were seen as a potential solution to the labor shortage in the New World.

African Coastal Trading Networks: European powers established trading posts and forts along the African coast to facilitate their commercial interests, including the acquisition of slaves. They formed alliances with local African rulers and intermediaries, who would capture or purchase slaves from neighboring regions and sell them to the Europeans.

Triangular Trade: The transatlantic slave trade developed as part of a larger network known as the Triangular Trade. European ships sailed from Europe to Africa, where they exchanged goods such as textiles, firearms, and alcohol for enslaved Africans. These enslaved individuals were then transported across the Atlantic Ocean to the Americas, where they were sold for raw materials, such as sugar, tobacco, and cotton. These goods were then transported back to Europe to complete the triangular trade cycle.

Slave Forts and Middle Passage: European powers constructed fortified trading posts, commonly known as slave forts or castles, along the African coast to store enslaved Africans temporarily before their transport across the Atlantic. The captured Africans were forced to endure the brutal Middle Passage, a horrific journey across the Atlantic characterized by overcrowded and unsanitary conditions, which resulted in significant loss of life.

Economic Benefits: The African slave trade became a highly profitable enterprise for European traders, as the demand for enslaved labor in the Americas continued to grow. The exploitation of enslaved Africans contributed to the economic development and wealth accumulation of European nations, particularly those involved in colonial ventures.

It is important to note that the African slave trade was a complex and multifaceted historical phenomenon that involved not only European powers but also African societies and other actors. However, the Age of Exploration and the subsequent colonization of the Americas played a crucial role in initiating and expanding European involvement in the African slave trade.

Answer:

physicians

Explanation:

Answer:

middle class

Explanation:

Plato

The United States had nearly fought alone in the Pacific War. atomic bomb the offered by Americans that supported the use of nuclear weapons It was that too many Americans would have died in a conventional attack.

If the weapon were to strike a densely populated location, the initial effect would probably instantly kill hundreds of thousands of people. Anybody within a few kilometers would sustain third-degree burns. People from up to 53 km far may go temporarily blind.

The bomb fell here on city of Hiroshima on August 6. The explosion sent a burst of fire and blinding light 2,000 feet (600 meters) above the city. It destroyed structures over a 5 square mile (13 square km) area, including houses and schools. About 140,000 people perished in just five days.

To know  more about  atomic bomb visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1168541

#SPJ1

Answer:

France invited them to settle in the region to help increase population

Explanation:

Answer:

France invited them to settle in the region to help increase population

Explanation:

i took the test