What was M.A counting on to support her in old age? And why has she lost faith that this will support her?
Answer:
Answer:c
Explanation:
How judges view their role as jurists can influence their decision-making. Some judges believe in
judicial activism, while others believe in judicial restraint.
Take a position on whether federal judges should exercise judicial activism or restraint.
Use at least one piece of evidence from one of the following foundational documents:
.
The Federalist 78
Letter From a Birmingham Jail
The Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution
In your response you should do the following:
✓ Respond to the prompt with a defensible claim or thesis that establishes a line of reasoning.
✓ Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of specific and relevant evidence.
One piece of evidence must come from one of the foundational documents listed above.
• A second piece of evidence can come from any other foundational document not used as your
first piece of evidence, or it may come from your knowledge of course concepts.
I NEED AND ESSAY WRITTEN PLEASEE!!
The method used by judges to make judgments is known as judicial precedent or decisions. Using previous similar instances as a guide, judges make decisions in legal precedent. The principle of stare decisis, which means to "stand by the decision already made," is the foundation for all court decisions.
What are the factors influencing decision-making and judgment?Personality, culture, situation, the amount of information at hand, and education level all play a role in decision-making. These elements should be considered whenever a person makes a decision because some of them, like personality or culture, are controllable but not all of them.
Some justices strongly believe in judicial activism, or the need to defend individual rights and liberties, and they work to stop actions and laws by other branches of government that they perceive as infringing on these rights. This type of justice is known as judicial activism. A justice's decisions are influenced by how he or she defines his role as a jurist.
Learn more about decision-making and judgment here:
https://brainly.com/question/29359957
#SPJ2
compare the june 1988 map to the june 1987 map. a. during which year was there more warm water near the peruvian coastline?
Sea surface temperatures in the eastern equatorial peruvian coastline were higher than usual during the 1997–1998 El Nino. September 1997 was the highest sea temperature in the previous 50 years.
The southeast tradewinds that traverse the Andes weaken every two to seven years. Surface water off the coast of peruvian coastline is no longer deflected offshore as a result of this. As a result, coastal upwelling in peruvian coastline is reduced. Off the coast of Peru, the sea surface water is still present, warming the coastal waters. Less upwelling results in more warm water than cold water at the tropical Pacific's El Nino. Trade winds and strong equatorial currents often move in a westward direction, and the peruvian coastline current causes cold water to upwell along the coast of west South America. But when there is an El Nino, the pressure shifts, reducing trade winds and driving warm water to travel eastward rather than westward toward the equator.
Learn more about El Nino here:
brainly.com/question/2491246
#SPJ4
Which action prompted the start of the Persian Gulf War?
I'm workin' on an essay so please hurry. Writing workshop: The New Deal. (Revising)
Final draft:
Prompt; Did the New Deal effectively provide relief to Americans during the Great Depression? Historians and economists still disagree over the answer to this question. Read the four articles provided here to learn more about both sides of the argument. Determine your viewpoint on this topic and develop a claim.
Write an essay to present an argument that either accepts or rejects the claim that the New Deal effectively provided relief during the Great Depression. Your argument should include a clear claim, logical reasons, and accurate data and other relevant evidence. It should also include, and rebut, a counterclaim.
The Great Depression of the 1930s was said to be one of the foremost annihilating financial emergencies in American history, taking off millions of Americans without employments, homes, or trust.
What is the The New Deal?In reaction to this emergency, President Franklin D. Roosevelt propelled the Unused Bargain, a arrangement of programs and arrangements pointed at giving help, recuperation, and change.
After some thought, I immovably accept that the New Deal is one that is given help to Americans amid the Great Depression. One of the most reasons for this can be that the Unused Bargain made employments and diminished unemployment.
Learn more about The New Deal from
https://brainly.com/question/936437
#SPJ1
Put the events in order first to last
= The Boston Tea Party
= The Tea Act
= The Intolerable Acts
= The Midnight Ride of Paul Revere
= The First Continental Congress
= The Battle of Lexington and Concord
please help!
What were the interests of Las Vegas Sands, and how does the Sands propose to meet those interests? Are there likely to be conflicts of interests within the Sands’ top management team?
The interests of Las Vegas Sands, a global casino resort company, primarily lie in expanding their operations and increasing their profits. To meet these interests, Sands has pursued a strategy of diversifying their offerings and expanding into new markets, such as Macau and Singapore.
The Sands have also invested heavily in technology and infrastructure to improve customer experience and efficiency.
There may be potential conflicts of interests within the Sands' top management team, as they may have differing opinions on how to best pursue these interests. For example, some may prioritize expanding into new markets, while others may prioritize investing in technology and innovation. However, as a publicly traded company, Las Vegas Sands is accountable to its shareholders and is ultimately guided by the overarching goal of maximizing profitability.
To learn more about Las Vegas Sands, visit: https://brainly.com/question/28883036
#SPJ11
List three reasons why there would be resistance to centralization of courts in city and county systems.
Answer:
Three reasons why there would be resistance to centralization of courts in city and county systems are:
• Public convenience: Many jurisdictions provide court services within about twenty minutes' driving time as a convenience for the public, which would be lost if courts were centralized[1].
• Fear of overreaching federal power: The framers of the Constitution limited the power of federal courts to avoid overreaching federal power[2].
• Court culture: The handling of cases, responsiveness of courts to community concerns, division of labor and allocation of authority between judges and court staff members, and court leadership are all aspects of court culture that could be disrupted by centralization[3].
rossetti was one of the leaders of the __________ brotherhood.
The Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood was a group of English artists and writers who formed in the mid-19th century. William Holman Hunt, John Everett Millais, and Dante Gabriel Rossetti were among the most prominent members of the brotherhood.
Rossetti was one of the leaders of the brotherhood and played a key role in its development and direction. The Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood was a group of English artists and writers who formed in the mid-19th century in response to the academic art of the time. The members of the brotherhood were dissatisfied with the formal, stylized approach to art that was prevalent at the time, and sought to return to a more naturalistic and detailed style inspired by the art of the Middle Ages.
William Holman Hunt, John Everett Millais, and Dante Gabriel Rossetti were among the most prominent members of the brotherhood. Rossetti was a poet, painter, and designer who played a key role in the development and direction of the brotherhood. He was known for his romantic and mystical paintings, which often featured themes of love, beauty, and death.
Learn more about Rossetti Visit: brainly.com/question/31545369
#SPJ4
The U.S. goal of stopping the spread of Communism contributed to all of the following, except the: a. March on Washington. b. Bay of Pigs Invasion. c. creation of the Peace Corps. d. formation of the House Un-American Activities Committee.
Answer:
A. March on Washington
Explanation:
A. March on Washington ---> for civil rights NOT to stop communism
B. Bay of Pigs Invasion ---> to stop fidel castro and his communist government
C. Creation of the Peace Corps ---> originally President JFK thought it could be established to stop communism
D. formation of the House Un-American Activities Committee ---> investigating any suspected activities of communism in the us
Listen to and find lyrics for the five songs listed. What common themes and
topics
nctice in the music?
do you
The theme in a literary work simply means the subject of talk or the message contained in it.
What is a theme?Your information is incomplete as the songs aren't listed. Therefore, an overview will be given. A theme simply means the underlying message in a song or story.
It should be noted that a theme in a literary work simply means the subject of talk or the message contained in it. It's the message that rte author wants the readers to know.
Learn more about themes on:
https://brainly.com/question/11600913
Why do you think so many regulations exist for proper treatment of the flag?
Answer:
the flag is representative for our country. it shows us as a free nation, and keeps peace, and us together. its very important to the nation.
Explanation:
who was Pakistan's head of state in 1947
Explanation:
The answer is Muhammad Ali Jinnah
What was the significance of the Russian Revolution?
Answer:
The Russian Revolution was significant because it eventually led to the takeover of the Russian government by the Bolsheviks who withdrew Russia from the war, allowing Germany to combine its troops in France.
Explanation:
Hope this helps:)
Write two paragraphs describing examples of creative people who make appropriate decisions at the beginning of their careers, and explain how those decisions affected their lives and the future of all humanity.
please add picture
at lest 4 people
In writing Paragraphs you must consider the structure of the Paragraphs, Paragraphs contain three main parts:
a topic sentence supporting sentences a concluding sentence.What are paragraphs?Generally, One example of a creative person who made appropriate decisions at the beginning of their career is Steve Jobs. Jobs co-founded Apple Inc. in 1976 and revolutionized the way people interact with technology. From the outset, Jobs was driven by his commitment to creating innovative products, and his decisions reflected his ambition. Jobs was relentless in his pursuit of excellence and uncompromising in his pursuit of perfection. As a result, Apple developed the first personal computer, the Macintosh, and the technology that would eventually lead to the iPhone, iPad, and other revolutionary products. These decisions had a profound impact on the lives of people all over the world, and allowed Apple to become one of the world's most successful companies.
Another example of a creative person who made appropriate decisions at the beginning of their career is Oprah Winfrey. Winfrey began her broadcasting career in 1976 and quickly became an influential figure in the entertainment industry. Throughout her career, Winfrey has made decisions that prioritize the needs of her audience and her own vision for success. She has used her platform to advocate for positive change and to champion social justice issues. Winfrey has also used her resources to create the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls, which offers education and support to underprivileged girls in South Africa.
Read more about paragraphs
https://brainly.com/question/24460908
#SPJ1
Why would Mirabeau Lamar not want Texas to join the U.S.?
1.He was making large amounts of money
2.Texas has no need for a president if they are a state.
3.He wanted to to give Texas back to Mexico
4.He did not like America
Answer:
incomplete question.
Explanation:
Surely there is more to this question? or background.
who was responsible for the transportation, supplies, and food for the continental army in 1778
A. Paul Revere
B. John Hancock
C. Nathanael Greene
D. John Burgoyne
In 1778, a new quartermaster was appointed who was to be responsible for logistics and feeding the Continental army. His name was C. Nathanael Greene.
General Nathanael Greene was one of the most notable figures in the American Revolution because:
He was a skilled officer He reorganized the office of the Quartermaster General to ensure that soldiers were adequately supplied across the country He commanded the Southern theatre of the war with efficiencyWhen he was appointed Quartermaster general in 1778, he was not very excited about it as he wanted to remain at war. He however excelled at it until he was reposted to command the Southern theatre by ensuring that proper supplies reached the army well in time for use.
In conclusion, Nathanael Greene was responsible for transportation and supplies in 1778.
Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/20361151.
correct me if i’m wrong
what does it reveal about the ratification of the constitution?
The ratification of the Constitution revealed that the nation was divided on whether it should be adopted.
The Constitution's ratification demonstrated that the country's opinion on its adoption was divided. Many of the founding fathers were in favor of it, but there were also some who were opposed to it.
Ultimately, the Constitution was ratified by a vote in the state legislatures, which was the method chosen by the framers. This method of ratification helped ensure that the Constitution was adopted by the people, rather than imposed on them by a central government.
It also allowed the people to have a say in the process of forming the central government and gave them a chance to influence the document.
To learn more about ratification of the Constitution link is here
brainly.com/question/28246915
#SPJ4
Why did millions of Germans abandoned their previous political allegiances to vote for the Nazi Party?
Give at least two reasons.
PLEASE HELP IM SHORT ON TIME!!
Economic and political instability: Many Germans were disillusioned with the existing political parties and were looking for a strong leader who could restore the country's status and pride. The Nazi Party, led by Adolf Hitler, was able to capitalize on this discontent and present itself as a viable alternative.
Propaganda and appeals to national pride: The Nazi's used propaganda and other tactics to appeal to the German people, such as promoting a sense of national unity and pride, and exploiting fears about economic insecurity and foreign threats. These efforts were successful in convincing many Germans to support the Nazi Party, leading to its rise to power.
Hi again
What was the main goal of the filibusters entering Texas? A to gain religious freedom they did not have B to start a war with the United States C To trade with Native Americans D To take land from the Spanish and start a colony
Answer:
C or D
Explanation:
In his arguments in Brown v. Board of Education, the lawyer for Linda Brown claimed that “separate but equal” public schools were separate but not truly equal. neither equal nor separate. equal but not truly separate. both separate and equal.
The lawyer for Linda Brown claimed that "separate but equal" public schools were neither equal nor separate.
In the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education, the lawyer for Linda Brown, Thurgood Marshall, presented a powerful argument challenging the doctrine of "separate but equal" public schools. Marshall contended that segregated schools were not truly equal, even if they were separate.
He argued that the notion of "separate but equal" violated the constitutional rights of African American students and perpetuated a system of racial inequality. Marshall's argument highlighted the inherent inequalities present in segregated schools. Despite the premise of equal facilities, resources, and opportunities, the reality was far from equal.
African American schools often suffered from inadequate funding, dilapidated infrastructure, outdated materials, and limited access to quality education compared to their white counterparts. This unequal treatment denied African American students the same educational opportunities and hindered their social and economic advancement.
Marshall further emphasized that the separation itself, even if the resources were equal, was inherently unequal. Segregation created a sense of inferiority and stigmatization for African American students, reinforcing racial divisions and fostering a climate of discrimination.
know more about Thurgood Marshall here:
https://brainly.com/question/1150183
#SPJ8
What was the role of the slave traders?
protected slaves from mistreatment
O held and transported slaves
O freed slaves who traded with owners
O raided plantations to steal and sell slaves
I believe the answer is A.
What issue did the Susse x Pledge deal with?
sinking commercial air ships, provide enough warning and ensure the safety of passengers and crew.
Explanation:
Marcus is a winemaker in ancient Rome. Each harvest, he buys grapes from the farmers outside Rome, and makes them into wine which he sells at the market in Rome. There are many other vendors who compete with each other, and the plebians are used to buying wine for exactly 15 denarii (currency) per bottle. This price has never gone up or down as long as Marcus has been alive. The grapes that go into a bottle of wine cost 10 denarii in a normal year but fluctuate with each harvest.
The farmers outside Rome produce more grapes than usual in a good year causing prices to fall below their normal level, and less grapes than normal in a drought. Last summer, there was a major drought that led to a poor harvest, causing grape input prices to soar to 20 denarii per bottle, (as stated previously, wine prices always stay the same). Marcus almost went bankrupt and drained most of his savings since he couldn’t buy any grapes to make wine. He is unsure of this year’s harvest and seeks to protect himself from future price shocks.
That spring, he speaks to a farmer in the countryside to guarantee himself a predetermined price ahead of time. The farmer agrees to enter a contract with Marcus to sell him enough grapes to make his wine for the year. They agree ahead of time, so that the grapes will be locked in at a fixed price of 12 denarii. Assume neither Marcus nor the farmer can break out of the contract and must buy/sell the grapes from each other at agreed upon 12 denarii.
Questions
1. This year, there is another drought, and grape prices again go up to 20 denarii. Consider what happens to Marcus and the farmer in this case. Does anyone "win" in this agreement?
2. Consider the risk that Marcus has normally been taking by buying grapes at the market price after each harvest. How does this risk change when he enters into the contract? Consider the cases where grape prices rise, fall, or stay the same.
3. Now consider the risk the farmer normally takes when he produces and sells grapes at the market after each harvest. How does his risk change if he enters the contract with Marcus?
4. Does either Marcus or the farmer always "win" in this situation? Can there be any mutually beneficial contract for both parties?
5. Do you think entering into the contract with the farmer is a good idea for Marcus? What incentivizes Marcus and the farmer to enter into these contracts every year?
6. The farmer is deciding whether or not to sell none, some, or all of his usual grape harvest through these contracts. What tradeoffs does the farmer incur in each case and what do you think he should do?
1. In the case of another drought, where grape prices again increase to 20 denarii, the agreement made between Marcus and the farmer will benefit Marcus because he has guaranteed the grapes at a fixed price of 12 denarii.
2. Normally, Marcus bears the risk of price fluctuations in the open market while buying grapes for wine-making.
3. The farmer takes a risk every year in producing and selling the grapes on the open market, as they do not know whether they will be able to sell their entire harvest and at what price.
4. It's not necessarily true that one party always wins in this situation. However, by entering into this agreement, both parties can gain some benefits.
5. Entering into this contract is an excellent idea for Marcus as it provides a fixed price and secures his supply chain, ensuring that he can continue to produce and sell wine at the same price.
6. If the farmer sells his entire harvest through these contracts, he will be at risk of losing out on the potential higher profits he could have made by selling grapes on the open market.
1. In the case of another drought, where grape prices again increase to 20 denarii, the agreement made between Marcus and the farmer will benefit Marcus because he has guaranteed the grapes at a fixed price of 12 denarii. However, the farmer loses out in this situation, as he could have made a higher profit if he had sold the grapes on the open market instead of at a lower price to Marcus.
2. Normally, Marcus bears the risk of price fluctuations in the open market while buying grapes for wine-making. However, in this case, he is protected from price fluctuations as the farmer and Marcus have entered into a fixed-price contract. Thus, Marcus will pay 12 denarii for every bottle, regardless of the harvest's quality. As a result, the risk Marcus takes decreases.
3. The farmer takes a risk every year in producing and selling the grapes on the open market, as they do not know whether they will be able to sell their entire harvest and at what price. The farmer is not exposed to the same level of risk as they were before, as they now have a guaranteed customer and can sell the grapes at a fixed price.
4. It's not necessarily true that one party always wins in this situation. However, by entering into this agreement, both parties can gain some benefits. A mutually beneficial contract can be made if both the farmer and Marcus agree on a fixed price that is advantageous to both.
5. Entering into this contract is an excellent idea for Marcus as it provides a fixed price and secures his supply chain, ensuring that he can continue to produce and sell wine at the same price. For farmers, it's an attractive offer because it reduces their risk exposure. Marcus is incentivized to enter into these contracts because they offer stability in his business, while the farmer is incentivized to do so because they offer a reliable source of income.
6. If the farmer sells his entire harvest through these contracts, he will be at risk of losing out on the potential higher profits he could have made by selling grapes on the open market. On the other hand, selling none of his harvests means he's entirely exposed to market risks. Therefore, it is ideal for the farmer to sell a portion of his harvest via these contracts while still selling the remaining on the open market to maximize profits.
Know more about Drought here:
https://brainly.com/question/6818677
#SPJ8
Governor Orval Faubus is associated with
A. the “Massive Resistance” speech.
B. the Southern Manifesto.
C. barring the integration of Little Rock Central High School.
Answer:
Governor Orval Faubus is associated with which of the following?
The speech calling for “massive resistance”
The Southern Manifesto
The integration of Little Rock Central High School
the correct answer is C!!
Explanation:
C:)
Governor Orval Faubus is associated with barring the integration of Little Rock Central High School. Hence, the correct answer is option C.
Who was Orval Faubus?Orval Eugene Faubus was an American politician who served as the Democratic Party's 36th Governor of Arkansas from 1955 until 1967. In 1957, he refused to comply with the unanimous judgment of the United States Supreme Court in the 1954 case Brown v. Board of Education, and ordered the Arkansas National Guard to keep black pupils out of Little Rock Central High School.
Orval Faubus was the longest-serving governor in Arkansas history, serving six consecutive terms. His record was progressive in many areas, but he is best known for his unsuccessful attempt to prevent the desegregation of Little Rock's Central High School in 1957.
Therefore, Governor Orval Faubus stopped the integration of Little Rock Central High School. The Little Rock Crisis was named after this occurrence.
To learn more on Orval Faubus, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31167311
#SPJ3
As a result of the watergate breakin, what aggressive tactics were used by the Republican Party in 1972?
Answer:
By 1972, when Republican President Richard M. Nixon was running for reelection, ... Their aggressive tactics included what turned out to be illegal espionage. ... into the Democratic National Committee's Watergate headquarters, stole copies of ... His abuse of presidential power had a long-lasting effect.
Explanation:
I hope this helps haha thanks byeee
How did the depression impact workers who were able to keep their jobs? How was this similar to and different from the impact on workers who lost their jobs?
Answer:
How were workers affected by the Great Depression?
A labor market analysis of the Great Depression finds that many workers were unemployed for much longer than one year. Of those fortunate to have jobs, many experienced cutbacks in hours (i.e., involuntary part-time employment). Men typically were more adversely affected than women.
How did the depression impact workers who were able to keep their jobs? ... The depression caused workers to live in fear and many had their hours or wages cut. They brought home paychecks that were 10, 20, sometimes 30 percent less than their pre-depression checks.
Which of the following is a belief shared by the Communist Party and the Socialist Party?
a) a flat income tax rate for all
b) Economy is the primary focus of government
c) individual-run private enterprise
d) limited government interference in the economy
How might this event have weakened the Qing Dynasty, frustrated the Chinese with their government, and led to the overthrow of the dynasty?
Answer:
After the Opium Wars, the Chinese were forced to sign “unequal” treaties with Europeans and Japan that gave imperial powers control over sections of China.Explanation: