Please help will mark brainlest, it would really help if you could answer both if the question in the picture
TO TURN RIGHT ONTO A TWO-WAY STREET FROM A TWO-WAY STREET, START IN THE RIGHT LANE AND END IN:
A. The left lane
B. The lane closest to the curb
C. Any lane that is available
Answers
Related Questions
Define, describe and differentiate a divided government from a united government - (Define and
describe means explain and give example/s).
I
Answers
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Define, describe and differentiate a divided government from a united government - (Define and
describe means explain and give example/s).
Which of the following is true about common law?
A. It is the supreme law of the land in the United States.
B. It is made by the president and ratified by the Senate.
O C. It is authority to issue legal obligations on specific people or
companies.
O D. It is derived from customs and judicial decisions.
Answers
Answer:
The correct answer is D.
Explanation:
Common law refers to a legal system in which the law is primarily developed through judicial decisions, rather than through legislation or executive action. Hence option D is correct.
It is based on the principle of stare decisis, which means that previous court decisions serve as binding precedents for future cases. Common law is derived from customs and practices that have developed over time and is shaped by the rulings of judges in specific cases.
It is not the supreme law of the land in the United States; that distinction is held by the Constitution. Similarly, common law is not made by the president and ratified by the Senate, as that process pertains to statutory law.
Learn more about common law here
https://brainly.com/question/30328846
#SPJ6
These THREE headlines below illustrate the constitutional principle of...
"senate Fails to Ratify Treaty of Versailles"
"president Truman Vetoed Traft Hartly Act"
"senate Rejects Nomination of robert bork to the supreme court"
A) diplomatic immunity. b) executive privilege
c) checks and balances d) due process of law
Answers
These THREE headlines below illustrate the constitutional principle of checks and balances
"senate Fails to Ratify Treaty of Versailles""president Truman Vetoed Traft Hartly Act""senate Rejects Nomination of robert bork to the supreme court"What is checks and balances?Checks and balances is a principle of governance through which different branches of government are constitutionally backed to prevent decisions or actions by other branches and are induced to share power. Checks and balances are applied primarily in constitutional governments.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above
learn more about checks and balances: https://brainly.com/question/20379476
#SPJ1
1. what is public opinion ?
a, views of the media about government policies.
b, views of the people on issues of public interest.
c, views of parents on their child's performance.
Answers
A Public opinion would be
The distribution of the population's beliefs about politics and policy issues So A
In the Wild West, who was the leading lawman?
Answers
Answer:
The sheriff was always the leading lawman in those days.
Explanation:
Towns in those days were very small and consisted of little authority, leaving the chief of police, or sheriff, the leading lawman.
Answer:
sheriff
Explanation:
The sheriff was the police captian for the town/village
What make’s Confirmation different from Ratification
Answers
Answer: Where the signature is subject to ratification, acceptance, or approval, the signature does not establish the consent to be bound. However, it is a means of authentication and expresses the willingness of the signatory state to continue the treaty-making process. The signature qualifies the signatory state to proceed to ratification, acceptance, or approval. It also creates an obligation to refrain, in good faith, from acts that would defeat the object and the purpose of the treaty.
Explanation:
Answer:
Confirmation is verification or final proof of something. (Example) In the church, confirmation is a rite in which a person is awarded full acceptance into.
Select the correct answer.
Against which type of economic structure does conflict theory argue?
OA.
communism
B.
socialism
C. democracy
OD. capitalism
Answers
Answer:
Democracy is the correct answer.
Note:If my answer is wrong please don't report..I will give try to best answer give ..!
If my answer is wrong please inform me..!!
Answer:
capitalism
Explanation:
i think , hopefully good luck
Describe some of the ways that you use energy in your own daily life.
Answers
Someone else can drive your car if _____.
A. you have proof of residency
B. they have proof of insurance
C. they have proof of residency
D. you have proof of insurance
Answers
Answer: B.
Explanation:
Option B states that someone else can drive your car if they have proof of insurance. This means that if the person who wants to drive your car can provide valid proof that they have insurance coverage, they are allowed to drive your car. Insurance coverage is important as it protects against potential accidents or damages that may occur while driving the vehicle. By requiring proof of insurance, it ensures that the driver is financially responsible and covered in case of any incidents. This requirement helps protect both the driver and the owner of the car.
which amendment of the constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishment?
Answers
Answer:
8th Amendment
Explanation:
Answer:
The Eighth Amendment of the constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.
I hope this helped at all.Who is the most important person in the court room during a trial?
Answers
Answer:
Prosecutor
Explanation:
Answer:
The prosecutor
Explanation:
because they make decisions that control the system
Who will become the next president and how do you know that will happen?
Answers
Answer ; the next us president will be the candidate who reaches 270 electoral vote different numder of electoral vote ; the large the punctuation of a state the more electoral vote it received
all electoral vote of a state are given to the candidate who receives majority of the vote
hope this help ples give 1000k follower an like an heart am a helper plesss
Officer Barnes has been pulling over speeders all night. Some drivers he tickets, some he doesn’t. If Officer Barnes acts according to the theory of radical criminology, which driver is LEAST likely to receive a speeding ticket?
a young teenager who just got her first car
a poor truck driver who is trying to make a deadline
a famous actress who is on her way to the airport
a group of construction workers headed home for the day
Answers
Answer:
I am not 100% sure but I think it is C. A famous actress who is on her way to the airport.
Explanation:
Radical criminology basiclly means someone using their power to control the working class and not the ruling class so out of all of them its probably the actress.
After reading the situation given above, the officer Barnes can award a speeding ticket under the principle theory of radical criminology to a famous actress who is on her to the airport. Therefore, the option C holds true.
What is the significance of radical criminology?Radical criminology can be referred to or considered as the theory that is based on the concept of not taking the entire society as a whole into consideration for determining the criminal liability of an individual. This is done to ensure who is better criminal out of the instances in front.
In the examples above, the officer Barnes must award a speeding ticket to a famous actress because the others are either having less knowledge, or have a deadline to meet.
Therefore, the option C holds true and states regarding the significance of radical criminology.
Learn more about radical criminology here:
https://brainly.com/question/22696883
#SPJ2
How do we benefit from the constitution?
Answers
Answer:
It protects the rights of the people inside the country, and it explains their obligations.
9. Which of the following would be the best response if you were on the witness? stand and asked a question that you are unsure of the answer? Guess the answer B. Bluff C. Make an estimated guess D. State " I don't know." E. Say " I plead the 5th"
Answers
what are Dalit&what do they do
Answers
Dalits are untouchables. they mostly work as labourers
You can expect to see___.
Answers
Answer:
me <3
Explanation:
state six emergency situation with the group that manages it
Answers
Answer:
Fire, Fire department.
Entity traped, Fire department.
Medical emergency, Hospital.
Theft, Police.
Murder, Police.
Wrecks. Firedepartment, Police, Hospital.
Explanation:
Brainliest?
who were the original constituents
Answers
Answer: Dow Jones: American Cotton Oil, American Sugar, American Tobacco, Chicago Gas, Distilling & Cattle Feeding, General Electric, Laclede Gas, National Lead, North American, Tennessee Coal and Iron, U.S. Leather.
Explanation:I hope this helps :) Brainlest Please
The resolution of a civil case prior to going to trial is called
a
A pretrial motion
b
A settlement
c
An arraignment
d
A deposition
Answers
Answer:
settlement
Explanation:
When the accused felt sincerely awful, & offered a position that secedes former demands that led to the disputes in litigation, they reach a settlement where both parties can be satisfied without needing a trial.
why does getting a bill passed require so many steps? Choose the best answers
A. To make sure that every bill is thoroughly examined, and has the support of a lot of people.
B. To make sure that every member of thr Congress supports a bill before it's passed
C. To prevent too many new laws from being passed
D. To make sure that the Supreme court will deem the bill Constitutional
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
i believe it is b because everyone needs to agree on it and if i'm wrong i'm really sorry
Is cruel and unusual punishment ever justified?
Answers
The Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment, which has been interpreted to mean that punishment should not involve torture, or degrading or inhumane treatment.
However, in some cases, the justification of the use of cruel and unusual punishment is a topic of debate. Supporters of harsh punishment argue that it can deter people from committing crimes and maintain law and order.
On the other hand, opponents of such punishment argue that it violates human rights and that there are alternative forms of punishment that can be equally effective.
In any case, it is essential to consider the circumstances of the case and the nature of the crime when deciding whether to apply cruel and unusual punishment. In some instances, such as terrorism or war crimes, there may be a need to impose harsh penalties to ensure justice and protect society.
Nevertheless, the use of cruel and unusual punishment should always be limited and subject to strict legal and ethical standards to prevent abuse and uphold the principles of justice and human dignity.
For more such questions on punishment
https://brainly.com/question/29429795
#SPJ11
Jordan estimated the length of a pen to be 23 cm. When he measured it, he discovered
that the actual length of the pen is 22 cm. Which of these is closest to the percent error
for Jordan's measurement?
a. 4.3%
b.
4.5%
c. 95.7%
d. 104.5%
Answers
Answer:
I think that it's c
Explanation:
Which of the following is not a basic procedure
Answers
The available options are:
A. Oil maintenance B. Self-assessment C. Seat/mirror adjustments D. Vehicle check
Hence, considering the following options, the option that is not a basic procedure is Oil maintenance.
This is because, considering the available question, it can be concluded that this is about basics procedures regarding car maintenance and basics procedures regarding car maintenance deal with things or activities like self-assessment, seat/mirror adjustments and vehicle checks.On the other hand, however, the issue of oil maintenance is more applicable, in the sense that, it needs changing only when the car reaches over 15,000km
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is : Oil maintenance
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/13775451
Apolline is a federal judge. When she hands down sentencing, she must abide by certain laws that dictate the sentence of incarceration that she can
impose. What are these laws called?
O A. flexible sentencing laws
OB.
mandatory sentencing laws
O C.
minimum sentencing laws
OD. mandatory minimum sentencing laws
ts reserved.
Reset
Next
Answers
Answer:
The laws that dictate the sentence of incarceration that a federal judge can impose are called federal sentencing guidelines. These guidelines provide rules for federal judges to consider when sentencing a person for a federal crime. The United States Sentencing Commission is responsible for creating and amending these guidelines.
Based on the options you provided, the closest answer would be D. mandatory minimum sentencing laws. However, it’s important to note that the term “mandatory minimum” refers to a specific type of sentence required by law for certain offenses, rather than the general set of laws that dictate sentencing.
D. mandatory minimum sentencing laws
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hope this helps!
Would you rather spend half a lifetime in prison or a lifetime on Probation? Why?
Answers
I would prefer a lifetime on probation for several reasons such as :
Reduced stigma Increased flexibility Why do some prefer probation to prison ?Probation allows individuals to remain in the community rather than being incarcerated in a correctional facility, which can be stigmatizing and isolating.
Probation allows for more flexibility than imprisonment, allowing individuals to maintain some control over their daily lives. Probation is generally less expensive than incarceration, which can be a factor for individuals who are concerned about the financial impact of a prison sentence.
Find out more on probation at https://brainly.com/question/9567331
#SPJ1
What would happen if people didn’t defending the nation
Answers
PLS HELP
Historically, which statement is true about the total number of bills vetoed in United States?
O
The vast majority of presidential vetoes remained in force, ending that version of the legislation.
O
The vast majority were pocket vetoes and thus could not be overridden.
O
The vast majority were determined to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
O
The vast majority of vetoes were overridden by Congress.
Answers
The vast majority of presidential vetoes remained in force, ending that version of the legislation is true about the total number of bills vetoed in United States.
Has a president veto ever been overridden in the US?When Congress overrode five of Franklin Pierce's nine vetoes during his presidency, it would be more than a decade until it did so again. More than 2,500 measures have been vetoed by American presidents so far, and Congress has only succeeded in overcoming the veto less than 5% of the time.
Since 1789, there have been 2,584 presidential vetoes. The "normal veto" and the "pocket veto" are the two different forms of veto. Reaching the two-thirds barrier requires significant public support, which is a challenging standard to accomplish. Because Congress has only overridden 106 of the 1,484 regular vetoes since 1789, or 7.1%, the President's veto power is significant.
To learn more about presidential vetoes, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1087799
#SPJ1
1. Do you think the adversarial system is the best method for solving disputes? Explain your
opinion.
ment will
2. Indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: "It is better that ten
guilty persons go free than that one innocent person suffer conviction." Explain your
opinion.
3. In a criminal case, should a lawyer defend a client he or she knows is guilty? Would you
defend someone you know to be guilty? Explain your opinion.
4. What reasons can you give to excuse the following people from serving on a jury; clergy,
attorneys, physicians, police officers, and convicted felons? Should everyone be required to
serve on a jury. Explain your opinion.
5. If you were a defense attorney questioning jurors at a voir dire in a murder trial, what
quesrions would you ask a potential juror?
6. For what reasons might an attorney use a peremptory challenge?
Answers
Answer: In some cases , it can be, if the defendant ( the person being advocated) is not able to defend ones self within their testimony, or having the ability to do so, the adversarial system can be a good place holder. But I will say there are multiple disadvantages and flaws in this type of system. In this system there is no actual evidence presented . For that reason many people can get away with infractions, and crimes because of the adversarial system.
Explanation:
personally, I think the truth can be found even without evidence, But I am highly skeptical about the fact that this sort of system would actually prove who is Innocent and who Is the criminal through no thorough or decisive evidence. I rest my case.
What do you think of the ruling in the Michigan police department case?
Answers
Answer:
What do you think of the ruling in the Michigan police department case
The recent ruling in the Michigan Police Department case has sparked a
heated debate among citizens and law enforcement officials alike. The case involved several officers who were accused of using excessive force during an arrest, resulting in the death of a suspect.
Some argue that the ruling was justified, as it sends a clear message that police officers must be held accountable for their actions. They believe that this will help to restore trust between law enforcement and
the community, which is essential for maintaining public safety.
Others, however, argue that the ruling was unfair and will only serve to undermine police morale. They point out that police officers often face dangerous situations where split-second decisions must be made, and that they should not be second-guessed by judges or juries who lack
their training and experience.
Ultimately, it is up to each individual to decide what they think of the ruling in this case. However, it is clear that we must continue to have open and honest discussions about how best to balance the need for
Explanation:
Without specific details about the case in question, it is difficult to provide a direct opinion on the ruling. Judicial rulings are typically based on the application and interpretation of relevant laws, precedents, and evidence presented during the legal proceedings. The outcome of a case can vary based on the specific circumstances, the arguments presented by the parties involved, and the legal principles applied by the court.
In general, a ruling should aim to uphold justice, protect individual rights, and ensure the fair and impartial administration of the law. It is essential for courts to consider the facts, weigh the evidence, and make decisions based on the applicable legal standards.
Public opinion on a ruling can vary depending on individual perspectives, societal values, and the impact of the decision on the parties involved and the wider community. It is important for the legal system to foster transparency and accountability, allowing for proper scrutiny and avenues for appeal to ensure that justice is served.
In any case, it is crucial for the ruling to be grounded in the principles of fairness, legality, and the protection of individual rights, while also considering the broader societal implications and the pursuit of justice.
for more questions on Judicial
https://brainly.com/question/29992339
#SPJ11