Paralegals and attorneys perform many of the same tasks. However, the average salary for an attorney is much higher than that of a paralegal. Why might this be?
A.
Attorneys know how to draft legal documents, and paralegals do not.
B.
Attorneys have more specialized knowledge than paralegals do.
C.
Only attorneys are allowed to handle case files.
D.
Paralegals go to school a lot longer than attorneys.
Answers
Answer:
Its C
Explanation:
a paralegal cannot handle cases like lawyers, simply because they are not authorized by the law to do so
However, the average salary for an attorney is much higher than that of a paralegal might this be Only attorneys are allowed to handle case files.
What distinguishes an attorney from a paralegal?A paralegal has had considerably less legal education than an attorney. When compared to attorneys, who must pass far more difficult tests, they often only need an associate's or bachelor's degree. It is impossible for paralegals to practice law alone. A qualified attorney must always supervise them.
Should a paralegal perform tasks that an attorney performs?The duties of a paralegal are also very similar to those of a lawyer (this is the key benefit of hiring a paralegal). For instance, paralegals frequently handle the activities listed below on behalf of their supervising attorney: Managing client communications and informing clients of the status of their cases.
To Know more about case files.
https://brainly.com/question/17096666
#SPJ2
Related Questions
how many dogs is too much and how many cats is too much.
please answer this question
Answers
Answer:
There is really never too much cats or dogs. It depends on a person's opinion.
Explanation:
If you don't like cats then one cat is to much. Same for dogs. It all depends on the person's opinion.
If your being passed in a no passing zone, you should
Answers
Slow down and let the other driver safely return to the drive lane. Passing areas are based on how far ahead drivers can see. Allow the passing vehicle to re-enter the drive lane as easily as possible to help everyone avoid potential upcoming hazards.
why do we call the Legislative Branch “the branch of you?
Answers
Answer: Laws are made for US to follow and to keep OUR community, family, and our country safe.
Explanation:
what is a major concern about COMPSTATs effectiveness? -
Answers
Compstat as a policing tactic gained popularity as a result of the notable decline in crime that occurred in New York City in the 1990s.
Compstat has received a lot of attention from academics and police practitioners as an innovative management method in policing. Despite its widespread use, the scientific efficacy of the Compstat method has not received much empirical investigation. Few research has also focused on Compstat tactics used outside of New York City during the 2000s. The current study examined whether Compstat led to a noticeable increase in "broken windows" arrests (minor nuisance offenses) and, using multivariate time-series analysis, the role of the Compstat strategy in explaining changes in violent, property, and total index crimes. Compstat was used by the FWPD to analyze monthly time-series arrest and crime data over a multi-year period.
Learn more about Compstat here:
https://brainly.com/question/30022415
#SPJ11
if marry warren is lying in deposition her punsihment will be
Answers
In "The Crucible: Act III" Danforth states that if Mary Warren is lying in her deposition, her punishment will be sentenced to jail.
In Act III of "The Crucible," Mary Warren, a character in the play, is called upon to testify against Abigail Williams and the other girls who have been involved in the witchcraft accusations. Danforth, the deputy governor overseeing the trials, questions Mary Warren's credibility and warns her of the consequences if she is found to be lying.
He asserts that if her deposition is proven false, she will be sentenced to jail for perjury. This statement reflects the serious nature of the trials and the importance of truth and honesty in the proceedings. It also serves as a deterrent to discourage individuals from providing false or misleading testimony, as they would face severe repercussions.
To know more about Mary Warren, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/32224729
#SPJ4
------------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
"In "The Crucible: Act III" Danforth states that if Mary Warren is lying in her deposition, her punishment will be _____________."-------------
If one strand of DNA has the genetic code: TTGAGCTAC its complementary strand
would read:
Answers
Answer:
AACTCGATG
Explanation:
What is the legal position of persons without combatant status who nevertheless take an active part in hostilities? What are the legal consequences these individuals may face for their conduct?
Answers
The legal status of noncombatants who take an active part in hostilities is a complicated and contentious subject of international law.
People who directly engage in hostilities without being lawful fighters or having status as a combatant are sometimes referred to as "unprivileged belligerents" or "unlawful combatants" under international humanitarian law.
Individuals who engage in hostilities against the law may face prosecution by their state. Typically, these cases are predicated on crimes like terrorism, war crimes, or other criminal behaviors.
Learn more about hostilities, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30331571
#SPJ4
what led to the passage of the sherman antitrust act? what practical impact did it have?
Answers
The Sherman antitrust act was passed by the congress to prevent merger of companies and restrained competition which can interfere in the free market and disturb free competition. Congress took it as a opportunity to divert people criticism of the government but was not likely given power. It was not enforced and later weakened by the courts of justice.
The Sherman antitrust act was passed in the United States in the year 1890 by the congress, which underlines importance of competitiveness in the market, outlawed trusts, monopolies, and cartels to increase economic competitiveness in the free market. The act prevented mergers of companies to form a monopoly protecting fair and healthy competitive behavior in the market but it was loosely worded and failed to define such critical terms as trust, monopoly, combination etc.
Know more about "Sherman antitrust act" visit
brainly.com/question/838791
#SPJ4
what is the difference between sheriff and police
Answers
Answer:
Police are responsible for the prevention of crime within city limits. A sheriff is responsible for an entire county.
Explanation:
The defendant operates a collection agency. He was trying to collect a valid $400 bill for medical services rendered to the plaintiff by a doctor that was past due.
The defendant went to the plaintiff's house and when the plaintiff's mother answered the door, the defendant told her that he was there to collect a bill owed by the plaintiff. The mother told the defendant that because of the plaintiff's illness, the plaintiff had been unemployed for six months, that she was still ill and unable to work, and that she would pay the bill as soon as she could.
The defendant, in a loud voice, demanded to see the plaintiff and said that if he did not receive payment immediately, he would file a criminal complaint charging her with fraud. The plaintiff, hearing the conversation, came to the door.
The defendant, in a loud voice, repeated his demand for immediate payment and his threat to use criminal process.
Assume that the plaintiff did not suffer physical harm as a result of the defendant's conduct, but did suffer severe emotional distress. If the plaintiff asserts a claim against the defendant based on intentional infliction of emotional distress, will the plaintiff prevail?
A: Yes, because the plaintiff suffered severe emotional distress as a result of the defendant's conduct.
B: No, because the bill for medical services was valid and past due.
C: No, because the plaintiff did not suffer physical harm as a result of the defendant's conduct.
D: No, because the defendant's conduct created almost no risk of physical harm to the plaintiff
Answers
The correct answer is A: Yes, because the plaintiff suffered severe emotional distress as a result of the defendant's conduct.
Even though the bill was valid and past due, the defendant's conduct in threatening the plaintiff with criminal charges and loudly demanding immediate payment in front of the plaintiff and her mother goes beyond what is acceptable in debt collection practices. The fact that the plaintiff did not suffer physical harm does not negate the severity of the emotional distress caused by the defendant's behavior. Intentional infliction of emotional distress requires extreme and outrageous conduct that causes severe emotional distress, which is met in this case. The defendant's conduct also created a risk of physical harm by threatening the plaintiff with criminal charges.
To know more about charges, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28721069
#SPJ11
suppose a judge sitting on a district court in texas is found to have been accepting monetary bribes from lawyers to rule in their favor on several cases. according to the texas constitution, what is the most likely action to be taken regarding this judge?
Answers
When a district court judge in Texas is discovered to have taken bribes from attorneys to decide in their favor on a number of cases, the Supreme Court of Texas will probably take steps to remove the judge from office.
The Judicial Conduct Commission has the authority to remove a judge from office for incompetence in the performance of the duties of the office, willful violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct, or persistent violation of rules promulgated by the Supreme Court of Texas.
In other words, judges are free to hold office for however long they see fit, and the only way to remove them from through impeachment.
A quorum must consist of seven persons. With the exception of recommendations for a judge's retirement, suspension, or removal, which must be granted by a vote of at least seven members, decisions must be made by most of those present.
To know more about Texas Supreme Court: https://brainly.com/question/14673579
#SPJ4
The President welcomes Pope Francis to the United States on behalf of the American people. Which role is the president carrying out?
Answers
Answer:
He's representing the United States.
Explanation:
When the President greets and welcomes the Pope to America, not only is he representing the American people, but he's also representing the United States as a whole. He is seen as Representing the United States.
pllllllessssssssss help
What do you get when you add air, ice, land, life, and water? That's right! The Earth and its spheres. The spheres are so interconnected that their interactions can have wondrous effects—like rainbows—and devastating ones—like melting glaciers. It's important for humans to recognize how their activities affect the spheres and Earth's health.
Think Like a Scientist
Talk Like a Scientist
Don't forget to use your Guided Notes to help you prepare for the assessment.
Experiment Like aScientist
Succulents inside glass terrarium
Spheres of Earth Hands-on Lab
For this investigation, you are going to create a terrarium to observe the water cycle in action. Follow the directions in Spheres of Earth Hands-on Lab. Please note, if you are unable to complete the hands-on version, a virtual version is provided in the Materials section. Complete the lab report while you perform the investigation. You will submit your completed lab report. Be sure to review the grading rubric before you begin.
Assessment
Check your understanding of important concepts.
Complete the 02.04 Spheres of Earth lab.
Unless Otherwise Noted All Content © 2020 Florida Virtual School
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
ts—like rainbows—and devastating ones—like melting glaciers. It's important for humans to recognize how their activities affect the spheres and Earth's health.
Think Like a Scientist
Talk Like a Scientist
Don't forget to use your Guided Notes to help you prepare for the assessment.
Experiment Like aScientist
Succulents inside glass terrarium
Spheres of Earth Hands-on Lab
For this investigation, you are going to create a terrarium to observe the water cycle in action. Follow the directions in Spheres of Earth Hands-on Lab. Please note, if you are unable to complete the hands-on version, a virtual version is provided in the Materials section. Complete the lab report while you perform the investigation. You will submit your completed lab report. Be sure to review the grading rubric before you begin.
Assessment
Check your understanding of important concepts.
Complete the 02.04 Spheres of Earth lab.
Unless Otherwise Noted All Content © 2020 Florida Virtual School
Answer:
Hamsters do inherit their traits for long fur or short fur through the parents. The parents are what affects the offspring's traits, these are determined by the different genes. For example, if there is a recessive gene for short fur, then there will be less of a chance for the offspring to inherit short fur and vice versa. In some instances, there is a recessive gene and a dominant gene, in that case, the dominant gene will overpower the recessive gene hence it's name. There are three types of possible gene pairs, homologous dominant: AA, homologous recessive aa, and heterogeneous dominant, Aa. If there is two of the recessive genes, then there is a higher chance for the short fur to appear in the offspring and etc.
Which of these cities was originally a prison settlement? · a Sydney · b. Phuket · c. Auckland · d. Johannesburg.
Answers
The city that was originally a prison settlement is Sydney. Thus, option a) (Sydney) is the correct option.
A penal colony or prison settlement is a place where convicted criminals are imprisoned. This colony was established in New South Wales, Australia, in the late 18th century, and it was initially intended to house some of the British Empire's toughest criminals.
Below are the reasons why Sydney was initially established as a penal colony:
Sydney was a hub for trade, and it was at the center of Australia's modern development. It was, however, the first destination of British convict ships bound for the continent. Its geographical position made it a convenient place to maintain a watchful eye on Australia's coasts and borders as well as an ideal location to establish a colony.In 1786, Britain made the decision to establish a penal colony in Australia due to their swelling jails. They decided to send prisoners to Australia instead of keeping them in overcrowded jails in the United Kingdom, which was becoming increasingly difficult to manage. As a result, in 1788, the First Fleet of British ships carrying prisoners to Australia arrived in Sydney.
To know more about prison settlement refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14179212
#SPJ11
What if somebody accidentally gives me the wrong answer? Wouldn’t I NOT be learning? And wouldn’t it be a waste of my points?
Answers
Answer:
yup that happenes sometime..
Explanation:
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answers
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
Which passage from the Article best supports the notion that the Federalists primarily agreed to the Bill of Rights because they supported the Constitution?
A.Most states also had a bill of rights and those that didn't at least list individual rights directly in their constitutions. The U.S. Constitution didn't even do that. What it did do was say that the Constitution was the "supreme law of the land" and was superior to state laws and constitutions.
B.Some of these were in the Magna Carta, and others were in the English Bill of Rights, which had been written fewer than 100 years before America's revolution. The rights in these documents were citizens' only protection from a government that could be both abusive and unpredictable and over which citizens had almost no control.
C.The Bill of Rights was a gesture of goodwill that was meant to bring everyone together around the new Constitution. Above all, the goal was to see the United States become a nation of unified people.
D.So not only did the Constitution fail to protect individual rights, but it also overruled the protections in state constitutions. It seemed that a bill of rights would be needed to ensure that the federal government could not overstep its bounds.
Answers
The Article best supports the notion that the Federalists primarily agreed to the Bill of Rights because they supported the Constitution is that, most states also had a bill of rights and those that didn't at least list individual rights directly in their constitutions.
The supporters of the Constitution, who were the Federalists, thought that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary and even dangerous. So, the authors of The Federalist Papers, including James Madison, argued for the ratification of the Constitution without Bill of Rights.
Federalists argued that the Constitution was not in need of a Bill of Rights, as the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government.
Hence, option A is correct.
To learn more about the Bill of Rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/10618576
#SPJ1
2. How many police officers die each year?
Answers
Answer:
According to the FBI database, there are an average of 64 police officers dying per year.
Common Law
A formal, written accusation submitted bt the court by a grand jury, alleging a
specified person has committed a specified offense, usually a felony
Governmental department for keeping order
Law of a country based on customs
A formal, written accusation submitted bt the court by a prosecutor, alleging a
specified person has committed a specified crime
The act of something that is against the law
To summon one to do the right
Answers
What is not included in the Patient's Bill of Rights? (A. The right to expect reasonable information from the provider) (B. The right to expect information to be kept confidential) (C. The right to take home one's own medical records) (D. The right to a fair hearing about any complaint against a provider, health plan, or facility).
Answers
The Patient's Bill of Rights is a set of guarantees that ensure patients receive quality care and treatment while maintaining their dignity and privacy. Among the options provided, what is NOT included in the Patient's Bill of Rights is (C) the right to take home one's own medical records.
The rights typically included involve informed consent, confidentiality, and the ability to voice concerns and complaints.
While patients have the right to access and obtain copies of their medical records, they cannot physically take home the original documents.
These records are maintained by healthcare providers to ensure accurate documentation and continuity of care. Patients can request copies, and in some cases, digital access to their medical information, but original records remain with the healthcare provider or facility.
In contrast, options A, B, and D represent rights that are included in the Patient's Bill of Rights, such as expecting reasonable information from providers, expecting confidentiality of personal and medical information, and having a fair hearing to voice complaints against providers, health plans, or facilities. These rights serve to protect patients and advocate for their well-being within the healthcare system. Hence, C is the correct option.
You can learn more about the Bill of Rights at: brainly.com/question/30092735
#SPJ11
Shondra is a comptroller and has worked at both the local and state level in this position. She has been able to retain her same membership in the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees regardless of the level she worked at. Shondra is a member of a(n) _____ union.industrial
Answers
Shondra is member of an industrial union if she has worked at both local and state level in this position.
What is an industrial union?Workers in Finland's light and heavy industries are represented by the Industrial Union, a trade union. On January 1, 2018, the Industrial Union TEAM combined with the Metalworkers' Union and the Wood and Allied Workers' Union to form the union. It joined the Central Organization of Finnish Trade Unions, much like its forerunners. The Industrial Federation's representatives expressed their optimism that the Paperworkers' Union will join within a few years despite the union's decision to opt out of the merger that created it. The building and woodworkers' international, the International Association of food, agricultural, hotel, restaurant, catering, tobacco other allied workers' associations, and the UNI Worldwide Union are the four global union federations to which the union belongs.
To learn more about state, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20372541
#SPJ4
Discuss criticisms of separation of powers
Answers
Answer:
One criticism of separated powers is that it can also result in weak government, especially if the legislative and executive branches are controlled by different political parties.
Explanation:
Answer:
The criticisms of the doctrine of separation of powers are: Complete separation is not possible, Complete separation is not desirable, Impracticable in itself, and Separation of powers can lead to deadlocks and inefficiency.
Please give me brainliest - you get 25% as well! I swear!
The legal title to a property is conveyed from one person to another person by means of
a. a written "deed"
b. a written "title abstract"
c. a written "guarantee of no encumbrance"
d. a written "title assurance"
e. a written "promissary nate"
Answers
The legal title to a property is conveyed from one person to another person by means of a written "deed". So, option A is accurate.
A deed is a legal document that transfers ownership of a property from one party (the grantor) to another party (the grantee). It contains specific details about the property, such as its description, boundaries, and any relevant conditions or restrictions. The deed serves as proof of ownership and provides evidence of the transfer of title.
The other options listed, such as a written "title abstract," a written "guarantee of no encumbrance," a written "title assurance," and a written "promissory note," are not typically used for conveying the legal title to a property. A title abstract is a summary of the history of a property's ownership, while a guarantee of no encumbrance ensures that the property is free from any liens or claims. Title assurance refers to insurance that protects against defects in the title, and a promissory note is a document that represents a promise to repay a debt but is not directly related to the transfer of property ownership.
To know more about a written "deed"
brainly.com/question/33608843
#SPJ11
Timothy is facing trial for a violation of civil law. As such, what is a potential punishment Timothy may face if the court rules against him?
А Timothy may be given a sentence of probation
B
Timothy may be subject to capital punishment.
Timothy may be imprisoned for a specified period of time.
o o
Timothy may be required to compensate the plaintiff,
2021 Illuminate Education.inc
Type here to search
O
Ri
Answers
Answer:
Timothy may be required to compensate the Plaintiff.
This is because a civil litigation usually involves some type of compensation for injuries or damages as well as disposition of property and other disputes.
However, if a guilty defendant is punished by incarceration and/or fines, or in exceptional cases, the death penalty.
Based on your reading of the following statement from the Department of Defense, what steps do you suppose the government is taking to make certain private contractors do not exceed their authority?
Top officials from the Defense and State departments today signed a joint memorandum that will increase coordination between American military forces, the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and private security contractors in Iraq. The document broadly defines how future use of force, movement, and reporting of incidents by security contractors in Iraq will be more closely coordinated with U.S. government entities. “We think this is a very good and strong memorandum of agreement between our two departments and should vastly improve the coordination and control of private security contractors operating in Iraq,” Defense Department spokesman Bryan Whitman said today.
With regard to legal accountability of private contractors, Whitman said, the memo reaffirms the departments’ commitment to work with Congress toward legislation that will “facilitate legal accountability” under U.S. law. Whitman said many of the provisions outlined in the memorandum already are in practice, but they will be further “operationalized” by officials at Multinational Force Iraq.
A. The Department of Defense recognizes the need to establish legal boundaries that assure private contractors do not exceed their authority.
B. With a few years, it is likely that private contractors will replace enlisted soldiers on the battlefield.
C. Corporate security forces are taking on an increasingly significant and legally appropriate role in modern warfare.
D. Contractors will not be used following the cessation of hostilities in Iraq.
Answers
Answer: It’s A
Explanation: I had it for edge.
The crime scene investigation team arrives at a car crash scene and finds that both the drivers are taken away in an ambulance and there are no eyewitnesses. The investigation team needs to determine how fast the cars were going. Which action should crime scene investigators take?
A. collect glass samples and perform an analysis
B use UV lamps to get an imprint off the speedometers
C. use forensic lamps to identify body fluids at the scene
D. Collect tiny particles of metal that flew off of the vehicles
Answers
Answer:
If I am understanding the question correctly, the answer would be B. Use UV lamps to get an imprint off the speedometers.
Explanation:
I hope this helps and if not, just comment on this post and i will see if I can provide further explanation to help you.
Which of the following would be considered an example of "shaping moral standards," as
seen as a function of the law?
A) laws granting freedom of speech and religion
B) laws discouraging drug and alcohol abuse
C) laws providing rights to peaceful protest
D) laws preventing overthrow of the government
Answers
As per the given question, the example of shaping moral standards, as seen as a function of the law is laws discouraging drug and alcohol abuse.
There is no denying that the law plays a significant role in shaping moral standards. Laws act as a framework for social interactions and behavior in society. They often establish what is and is not acceptable in society. A moral standard is a moral value that is considered to be good or bad.
Morals are developed through socialization and passed down through generations as acceptable behaviors. There are several examples of how the law shapes moral standards, including granting freedom of speech and religion, providing rights to peaceful protest, discouraging drug and alcohol abuse, and preventing overthrow of the government.
The law has a significant influence on what is and is not acceptable in society. The legal prohibition of certain substances, such as drugs and alcohol, plays a role in shaping moral standards.
The law is designed to protect society from harmful substances and, in the process, shape the moral standards of society.
To know more about moral standards, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28953158#
#SPJ11
Although adults retain this right via the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution, most states refuse juveniles the _____.
Answers
In modern day terms, what determines the classification behind a white-collar crime?
the profession of the victim
the profession of the criminal
the type of crime committed
the area the crime was committed in
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
In modern day terms, what determines the classification behind a white-collar crime?
the profession of the victim
the profession of the criminal
the type of crime committed
the area the crime was committed in
explain how policy initiatives and executive orders promoted by the president often lead to conflict with the congressional agenda.
Answers
The President of the United States has a number of tools at their disposal to implement their policy agenda, including executive orders and policy initiatives. Executive orders are directives issued by the President that have the force of law. Policy initiatives are broader policy goals that the President seeks to achieve. However, these tools can often lead to conflict with the Congressional agenda.
Executive orders: They can be used to implement policies that are not specifically authorized by Congress, or to interpret existing laws in a way that the President believes is consistent with their agenda.
However, executive orders can be challenged in court, and they can be overturned by Congress if they are not supported by the majority of the legislature.
Policy initiatives: These initiatives may be supported by Congress, but they may also be opposed by certain members of Congress or by the entire legislature. In these cases, the President may have to use their political capital to persuade Congress to support their agenda.
When the President's policy initiatives or executive orders conflict with the Congressional agenda, it can lead to a number of problems.
First, it can make it difficult for the government to function effectively. If the President and Congress are at odds, it can be difficult to pass legislation, and it can be difficult to implement policies that have already been passed.
To know more about Executive orders:
https://brainly.com/question/11422252
#SPJ4