ownership rights for original creative works are referred to as software licenses.

The statement "Regarding Heman Sweatt vs Painter, the US Supreme Court ruled that the University of Texas at Austin did act legally in its attempt to create a small separate basement law school facility to instruct him only as a black student." is false as University of Texas at Austin's attempt to create a separate law school facility for black students.

The US Supreme Court determined in Heman Sweatt v. Painter that the University of Texas at Austin's efforts to establish a separate law school facility for black students were not equal to the opportunities offered at the main law school and, as a result violated the "separate but equal" principle.

In the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education, which ruled segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional, the court determined that the separate facility did not adhere to the standards established by that precedent. Racially segregated educational institutions in the US were eventually abolished thanks to the Sweatt case decision.

Learn more about Heman Sweatt vs Painter at:

brainly.com/question/12304411

#SPJ4

An admission is a statement made in court, under oath, or at some stage in a legal proceeding in which one party against whom charges have been brought admits that an oral contract existed, even though the contract was required to be in writing.

The federal court docket machine has 3 primary levels: district courts (the trial court), circuit courts which are the primary stage of appeal, and the ideally suited court docket of the USA, the very last degree of attraction within the federal device.

Fundamental differences have to be made among criminal and civil courts, between courts of fashionable jurisdiction and those of confined jurisdiction, and among appellate and trial courts.

Learn more about courts here https://brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ4

Answer:

Answer Expert Verified The statement that best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses is “Under one unified government, people will be robbed of their freedoms.”

What best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses? They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals. ... He was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution. Read the excerpt from The Federal Farmer.

WAS THIS ANSWER HELPFUL?

MARK ME AS A BRAINLIEST

They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals. He was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution. Read the excerpt from The Federal Farmer.

A constitution is a collection of guiding ideas or accepted precedents that serve as the foundation for a polity, organization, or another sort of body's legal system and frequently specify how that institution is to be governed.

A state's constitution serves as its rulebook. It lays out the guiding ideals that the state is governed by. It provides an overview of the state's primary institutions and outlines their interrelationships (for example, between the executive, legislature, and judiciary).

The members of the provincial assemblies chosen by the Indian populace formed the Constituent Assembly of India, which drafted the Constitution. The first president of the Constituent Assembly was Dr. Sachidanand Sinha. Eventually, it elected Dr. Rajendra Prasad as president.

Learn more about the Constitution here:

https://brainly.com/question/29799909

#SPJ2

Answer:

Builds public approval of congress

Answer:

MuRdEr?!??

Explanation:

today this the answer TVT I'm Proud of myself

Federalism refers to the sharing of power between state and national governments. (Option A)

Federalism is the division of power between state and federal governments. Power is divided and shared between these two levels of government in a federal system of government, with each level having its own domain of authority.

This division of power allows the central or national government and various state governments to share responsibility and decision-making. This gives the states some autonomy while still preserving a cohesive national administration.

Learn more about federalism here: https://brainly.com/question/985210

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:A majority of homicides involve offenders and victims who share a large number of characteristics. The most typical homicide involves a victim and offender who are similar in age, race/ethnicity, gender, and prior involvement in the criminal justice system.

The standard that asks a judge to weigh the strength of the case by determining whether the prosecution has presented enough evidence at a preliminary hearing that could be sent to a jury at a real trial is called the probable cause standard.

Probable cause is a legal standard that requires a judge to determine if there is enough evidence in the prosecutor's case to justify proceeding to trial. At a preliminary hearing, a judge is asked to weigh the strength of the case by determining whether the prosecution has presented enough evidence that could be sent to a jury at a real trial.

A probable cause hearing is a preliminary hearing in which the prosecutor presents evidence to the judge to establish that there is enough evidence to support a reasonable belief that a crime was committed by the defendant. It is important to note that the probable cause standard is not a high standard, but rather, it is a low standard that is only meant to establish that there is enough evidence to support a reasonable belief that a crime was committed.

Learn more about probable cause https://brainly.com/question/28399684

#SPJ11

It is no please that I have not been seen

Answer:

b which is concurrent jurisdiction

Answer:i dont know really

Explanation:

Answer:

this is a law order given the owner a standing order to forbid others from using the mark in a way that will lessen the beauty or priority.

A work-study program is a form of financial aid that is often dependent on where you live.

This is further explained below.

Generally, Work-study programs are a kind of financial assistance that is often determined by the location of the student.

In conclusion, Perform study is a term that refers to a program that is offered at a variety of educational institutions and gives students the opportunity to work part-time employment in order to reduce the overall cost of their education.

A student who attends college full-time and works part-time (for example, in the college library) is participating in a work-study program.

Read more about Work-study programs

https://brainly.com/question/14390284

#SPJ1

Answer:

In sex crimes, the victim interview is usually your main evidence and your main source of evidence leads, more so than with any other crime. At the same time, the sex crime victim's telling of their stories is usually much more inhibited, guarded, and vulnerable to distortion than for victims of other crimes. Complicating the picture even more, no other crime victim interview tends to make the interviewer feel more uncertain about how best to proceed.DON'T - start your interview without again dedicating three or four minutes solely to addressing the victim's needs and concerns.

Sex crimes victims almost always arrive at the interview plagued with shame, anxieties, misinformation, and with fears of being judged. Even more significant, they usually come to these interviews still very uncertain about whether or not they really want to be going forward with the justice process.

This state of mind is in stark contrast, for example, to a robbery victim who is completely unconflicted about their outrage and can't wait to get the story on the record. As long as these anxieties and uncertainties of sex crimes victims remain unaddressed, chances are they're going to be very hesitant and holding back.

Explanation:

Answer:

Option Contract

Explanation:

A contract is a legally binding agreement between two parties. In contract law, the agreement to keep an offer open for a certain period of time, within which the contract cannot be revoked by the offeror is known as an Option contract. This must be supported by the offeree's consideration.

If the offeree rejects the agreement, then his right of acceptance has been terminated in most jurisdictions. Other factors that can result in the termination of the offeree's power of acceptance include; a counter offer by the offeree, an expiration of the offer, and a conditional acceptance by the offeree.

The Brazilian Revolt of 1930: A military coup d'état that overthrew President Washington coup d'etat and installed the Brazilian military junta of 1930 followed an armed revolution.

The crime of coup d'etat is a sudden the assault accompanied by violence, intimidation, threat, strategy, or stealth, directed the against duly elected government officials in the Philippines military, as well as any military camp or installation, communications network, public utilities, or other facilities required for the exercise. "A sudden attempt by a small group of people to the take control of the government, the typically via violence," is what a coup d'état is.

To learn more about military, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/28357806

#SPJ1

In a proximate cause analysis, both "the subsequent disease and the negligence of rescuers" are almost always foreseeable as intervening forces. Option C is correct.

In a proximate cause analysis, foreseeability plays a crucial role in determining whether a defendant can be held liable for the harm caused. In this case, the subsequent disease refers to a condition or illness that arises after an initial event or injury. It is often foreseeable that certain injuries or incidents can lead to the development of diseases or health complications.

Similarly, the negligence of rescuers, such as emergency medical personnel or bystanders, can be reasonably anticipated as an intervening force. When someone is injured or in need of assistance, the actions or omissions of those providing aid can impact the outcome and potentially exacerbate the harm or cause additional injuries.

Overall, in the context of proximate cause analysis, both the subsequent disease and negligence of rescuers are considered foreseeable intervening forces that may contribute to the overall harm or damages suffered.

Option C holds true.

The complete question:

In which of the following are both of the intervening forces almost always foreseeable in a proximate cause analysis?

Learn more about intervening forces: https://brainly.com/question/15054575

#SPJ11

Answer:

2πr

Explanation:

circumference of this Circle is 2πr

Answer:

First square the radius to give 64 and multiply it by Pi (3.14) to give 201.06... Now divide 201.06 by 4 to give 50.3 cm^2 rounded to

Explanation:

C. Putting someone on trial again for a crime of which he or she was acquitted.

Crime is the violation of a law or laws that results in punishment for the offender. It is a broad concept that encompasses a wide range of activities, from minor infractions such as traffic violations to serious offenses such as ra pe or murder. Crime is a social construct that is defined by the laws of a particular jurisdiction. It is an intentional act or omission in violation of criminal law and punishable by the state or other legal authority. Crimes can range from misdemeanors to felonies and carry a variety of punishments.

Double jeopardy is a legal concept that prevents a person from being tried for the same crime twice, after being acquitted or convicted. This is enshrined in the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution.

To learn more about crime
https://brainly.com/question/14933777
#SPJ1

Answer:

before the government may deprive someone of “life, liberty, or property.” In other words, the Clause does not prohibit the government from depriving someone of “substantive” rights such as life, liberty, or property; it simply requires that the government follow ...

Answer:

Enforcing Laws: Nominating people to run a executive departments.

Influencing new laws: giving congress information about the country and giving Congress ideas for new laws.

Explanation:

Answer:

Influencing new laws: giving congress information about the country, giving Congress ideas for new laws.

Enforcing Laws: Nominating people to run executive departments.

Explanation:

The crime of snatching a purse containing $1000 from the victim's hand is classified as robbery.

Robbery is typically defined as the act of snatching a purse containing $1,000 out of the victim's hand. Robbery is a crime that involves the unlawful taking of someone else's property while they are present while using force, threats, or intimidation. In this instance, the victim is put in danger when the perpetrator forcibly takes away their purse.

In most jurisdictions, robbery is regarded as a serious offense because it directly endangers the victim's safety and property. Depending on the jurisdiction and particular facts, robbery penalties can vary but they frequently have serious legal repercussions, such as jail time, fines and restitution to the victim.

Learn more about robbery at:

brainly.com/question/33396412

#SPJ4

In negligence cases, courts rarely grant punitive damages.

About Punitive damages

In some cases, punitive damages are given in lieu of actual losses. Punitive damages are viewed as punishment and are frequently granted just at court's discretion whenever the defendant's actions are judged to have caused particularly great injury. Normally, punitive damages are not granted in the context of a lawsuit for contract breach.

Punitive damages may be used by courts in cases of tort culpability. They normally won't, though, unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that the defendant committed an intentional tort or acted wantonly and knowingly.

To know more about punitive damages:

brainly.com/question/14265086

#SPJ4

Answer:

true

Explanation:

the higher the ball is the more gravity builds

Answer:

error, mistake, or a symbolic reprisentation for two different angles and lines

Answer:

a law allowing courts to prevent people who show signs of being a danger to themselves or to others from having access to firearms (as by ordering the seizure of weapons)

for purposes of determining capacity, intoxicated persons include those under the influence of alcohol, but not drugs: False.

A person is considered to be under the influence of alcohol if they have consumed enough alcohol—in any amount—to have a negative impact on their actions, reactions, conduct, movement, or mental processes, or to significantly slow down their reactions, which makes it more difficult for them to drive. Driving while intoxicated includes being under the influence of alcohol as well (DUI).

Any contract that a person attempts to engage into after being declared crazy and having a guardian appointed is void since they lack the legal competence to do so. Intoxicated people include individuals under the effect of alcohol but not drugs when evaluating ability.

Hence, the given statement is false.

To know more about influence of alcohol refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/947751

#SPJ4

Answer:

The meaning of haunting is lingering a memory. Haunting is used with respect to the memories that are negative and had a negative psychological effect on the person.

Please mark as Brainliest!!

Answer:

C

Explanation:

It's actually 44 billion but the answer you put says 40, so go with 35 and 40.