Ok we're going to be looking at border security issues for several countries around the world including of course, America. I want you to get a feel for three current state of order security in America and in one other nation in the world. You pick the nation you are going to be dealing with throughout the semester along with America. Each week I'll post an assignment referring to America and you will complete that assignment as it pertains to US but also as it pertains to the nation you select. For instance, if you choose Israel and I assign you to tell me the number of security personnel assigned to customs issues, you'll tell me the number in American customs, and Israeli customs.

This week I want you to give me at least 250 words explaining the state of border security in America, and of course in the country you've chosen. (You'll use this same alternate country throughout the semester so put a little thought into it. The 'state' will be based on fact but you can also use some of your own opinion.

The General Mining Act of 1872 is a federal law that governs the exploration and mining of minerals on public lands in the United States. However, after a thorough review by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), it was suggested that this act be amended.

The GAO found that the current mining law is outdated and does not provide sufficient protection for the environment or taxpayers. The GAO recommends that the government should consider revising the royalty system to ensure that mining companies pay a fair share of profits and that the government should have more control over mining operations on public lands. The GAO also recommends that the government should improve its oversight of mining operations to ensure that environmental standards are met and that taxpayers are not left with the costs of cleanup and restoration. In conclusion, it is crucial for the government to take action to update the General Mining Act of 1872, and ensure that the mining industry operates in a responsible and sustainable way.

To know more about profits visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29662354

#SPJ11

Answer:

PSD

Explanation:

The most recent amendment to the United States Constitution is the 27th Amendment. It was ratified on May 7, 1992, and provides that any law that increases or decreases the salary of members of Congress cannot take effect until the beginning of the next session of Congress.

The amendment was first proposed in 1789 as part of the original Bill of Rights, but it was not ratified by the necessary number of states at that time. It was eventually ratified more than 200 years later, after a grassroots campaign by college students who were inspired to revive the amendment and succeeded in getting it ratified by enough states. The 27th Amendment is a reflection of the Founding Fathers' concern for ensuring that the salaries of members of Congress are not influenced by their own actions, but rather are set by the people they represent.

To know more about amendment click here:

brainly.com/question/13276616

#SPJ4

The factor that is NOT one of the four factors used by arbitrators when deciding cases is "c.

The wording of the labor agreement: Arbitrators carefully examine the language and terms of the labor agreement that is in dispute. They analyze the specific clauses, provisions, and terms mentioned in the agreement.

Testimony and evidence offered during the hearing: Arbitrators review the testimonies and evidence presented by both parties during the arbitration hearing. This may include witness statements, documents, and other relevant evidence.

Past practice and precedents: Arbitrators consider past practices and precedents established in similar cases or within the industry. They look for consistency and previous decisions that may have bearing on the current case.

Relevant laws and regulations: Arbitrators take into account applicable laws and regulations that govern the particular labor agreement or dispute. This ensures that the decision aligns with legal requirements.

However, "c. How manag" is not a recognized factor used by arbitrators when deciding cases. It seems that the question may have been cut off, but based on the provided options, "c. How manag" does not align with the typical factors considered by arbitrators.

To know more about arbitrators, visit:

brainly.com/question/33985273

#SPJ11

Answer:

I think it's option (A) Why are crime rates higher in that area than another area?

Answer:

a

Explanation:

The use of a third party to solve a legal dispute most likely refers to the process called alternative dispute resolution (ADR).

ADR is a general term that encompasses various methods for resolving disputes outside of traditional litigation, where parties typically present their case before a court. ADR methods include mediation, arbitration, negotiation, and conciliation. These processes involve the intervention of a neutral third party who facilitates communication, assists the parties in reaching a resolution, and helps them avoid the time, expense, and uncertainty associated with formal litigation. Mediation involves a mediator who helps the parties explore options and reach a mutually acceptable agreement. Arbitration involves an arbitrator who listens to the arguments of both sides and makes a binding decision. Negotiation and conciliation involve direct discussions between the parties, sometimes with the assistance of a neutral third party, to reach a settlement. ADR is often preferred because it can be faster, less expensive, and more flexible than going to court. It also allows the parties to have more control over the outcome of the dispute and can help maintain or repair relationships, particularly in ongoing business or personal relationships.

Learn more about legal disputes here :brainly.com/question/30479204

#SPJ11

"Court decisions upon which courts later rely in similar cases are known as precedents."

Precedents are important because they provide guidance and consistency in the legal system. By following precedents, courts can ensure that similar cases are treated in a similar way, which promotes fairness and predictability in the legal system. This also helps to maintain the stability of the legal system, as precedents can create a foundation for future rulings and decisions.

Moreover, the use of precedents can also prevent the need for courts to revisit previously settled legal questions, which can save time and resources. However, it is important to note that precedents can also be overturned or distinguished in certain circumstances, particularly if they are outdated or no longer align with current legal principles.

Learn more about Precedents brainly.com/question/29618649

#SPJ11

☁️ Answer ☁️

I don't understand.. but here:

The interest that is earned on those investments over a period of time is considered income.

Hope it helps.

Have a nice day noona/hyung!~ ￣▽￣❤️

It is a true statement that a significant collision prevention has been achieved over the last decade with a 25% decrease in the number of those killed in motor vehicle crashes.

In 2006, for more than 10 years, there has been a 25 percent reduction in the number of fatalities on the Nation’s roadways.

Despite that there were 32,675 motor vehicle fatalities, the decline in fatalities tells about the general trend downward in fatalities that started in 2006.

Therefore, the statement is a true statement.

Read more about accident prevention

brainly.com/question/15938130

#SPJ1

Answer:

Imprisonment is not the only way to rehabilitate a person who violated the law, since there are alternative penalties to prison, such as fines, bonds, jobs and collaborations in non-profit social entities and victim reparation systems. In all these cases, the defendant receives a penalty, but this is not the prison but an alternative to it, which still puts him at a disadvantage compared to the rest of society as a result of his non-compliance of the law, but due to the low severity of the crime, the defendant does not deserve a prison sentence.

Answer: The U.S. antitrust laws give the government a range of powers to protect competition and promote consumer welfare in the marketplace.

Explanation:

The U.S. antitrust laws give the government a range of powers to protect competition and promote consumer welfare in the marketplace. These laws, which include the Sherman Act, the Clayton Act, and the Federal Trade Commission Act, are intended to ensure fair and open competition by prohibiting certain types of anticompetitive behavior by firms.

Specifically, the Sherman Act prohibits companies from forming cartels or engaging in other activities that restrain trade, such as price-fixing, market division, and bid-rigging. The Clayton Act prevents mergers and acquisitions that would substantially reduce competition, and it also prohibits certain practices related to pricing, such as price discriminations. The Federal Trade Commission Act prohibits unfair and deceptive trade practices, such as false advertising and failing to disclose material information to consumers.

The government also has the power to bring civil and criminal actions against companies that violate these laws. Civil actions can result in orders requiring companies to change their behavior or pay civil fines and penalties. Criminal actions can result in prison sentences and fines for executives and companies.

In addition, the government has the power to investigate potential antitrust violations and issue investigative demands to companies, including requests for documents and testimony. This enables the government to obtain evidence to determine whether any antitrust violations have occurred.

Overall, the U.S. antitrust laws give the government a variety of powers to protect competition and promote consumer welfare. These powers are essential to ensure a fair and open market and prevent anticompetitive behavior by firms.

Answer:

Depends on what people think this is an opinionated question but here is what I thinks:

Explanation:

Not very often; as of 2020 with the murder of George Floyd people are way more decisive on police officers and how they do there job. This does not happen often. Up to many times of people saying corruption and police brutality there has been proof of someone handeling a gun, not co-operating, or being a threat. Im not saying it does ot happen but we need to look deeper than what we see and think.

Answer:

b) Utilitarians and Aristotle both believe that the government should attempt to maximize the aggregate of pleasure minus pain, whereas Rawlsian believe that the government should simply protect rights.

Explanation:

Utilitarians believe that the interest of government should be the same as that of the people, the reason is that, as a whole, the greatest liberty of people is a function of the welfare the people wish to enjoy, and this eads to the possibility and the desirability of progressive social change through peaceful political processes.

At the same time, Aristotle believe that government should govern for the general good or interest of the people, he concluded that, a kind of constitutional democracy, is the most ideal, as it sought for general interest of the people, in which rich and poor respect each other’s rights and the best-qualified citizens rule with the consent of all.

On the contrary, Rawls Liberalism believe that government should only uphold what is ideal, by balancing what is right with justice. According to him, government should protect the citizens, but not necessarily giving in to the aggregate pleasure of the people, that is, doing what is right, which will be supported by reasonable people as against what is considered good.

Hence, Utilitarians and Aristotle both believe that the government should attempt to maximize the aggregate of pleasure minus pain, whereas Rawlsian believe that the government should simply protect rights.

Answer: C

Explanation:

Studying sociology helps people be more open to diverse cultures and different

   Sociology is a discipline that analyzes human society critically. Different cultures are a result of the fact that societies are rarely culturally homogeneous. Different cultural traditions emerge as cultures grow and become more complicated. The likelihood that a culture will be internally diverse and varied increases with the complexity of the society. Cultural diffusion, invention, and the imposing of cultural change by the outside world are the causes of cultural changes in a society.

    Thus sociology examines human society in order to understand cultural diversity. It claims that factors like language, beliefs, customs, and values contribute to cultural diversity.

To learn more about sociology click here:

https://brainly.com/question/4120495

#SPJ9

Answer:

Yes!

Explanation:

You can sue anybody for anything as long as the judge accepts it.

Answer:

There were several reasons for the German success against Russia in the east during World War II:

Overall, a combination of military superiority and strategic planning gave the Germans an initial advantage against the Soviet Union in the east.

What is a word processor?

A. Searches the Internet for documents that contain a key phrase that the user enters

B. Organizes and categorizes information in a way that it can be accessed easily

C. Stores changes, and formats text typed using a keyboard; text can be saved into a computer document and printed

The vicarious responsibility is based on (D)  Respondeat superior.

Vicarious responsibility refers to a legal doctrine that holds one party responsible for the actions or omissions of another party. It is based on the principle of "Respondeat superior," which means "let the master answer" in Latin. This doctrine is primarily applied in the context of employer-employee relationships, where an employer may be held liable for the actions of their employees performed within the scope of their employment.

Respondeat's superior holds that employers are vicariously responsible for the negligent or wrongful acts committed by their employees while carrying out their job duties. This means that if an employee causes harm or damage to someone else due to their actions or negligence during the course of their employment, the employer can be held legally accountable for the employee's actions.

The concept of respondeat superior is based on the idea that employers have a degree of control and authority over their employees, and therefore, they should bear the responsibility for any harm caused by their employees' actions within the scope of their employment.

In contrast, the other options are not directly related to the concept of vicarious responsibility:

A. Proximate cause refers to the legal concept that establishes a close connection between the defendant's actions and the resulting harm.

B. Consent decree is a legal agreement reached between parties to resolve a dispute without admission of guilt or liability.

C. Duty of care refers to the legal obligation to act in a manner that avoids causing harm to others.

Therefore, the correct answer for vicarious responsibility is (D) Respondeat superior, as it specifically relates to the liability of employers for the actions of their employees. Therefore, the correct option is D.

The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:

Which of the following is vicarious responsibility based on? Select one.

Question 9 options:

A. Proximate cause

B. Consent decree

C. Duty of care

D. Respondeat superior

Know more about Respondeat superior here:

https://brainly.com/question/32243532

#SPJ8

If the sum is a realistic estimate of the loss resulting from a breach, then this is a liquidated damages provision.

From their most fundamental level, contracts are a vehicle that promotes better corporate agreement. Because they represent a collection of terms that both parties have decided upon, contracts are particularly effective at averting potential war and legal issues.

Legally binding agreements are practical tools for maintaining an effective business. Contract for business services provide the essential legal protections you need for any activity. In addition to lowering risk, contracts also protect you and your company by outlining your obligations and rights within every agreement.

To know more about Contract visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28197085

#SPJ4

A) A provision of International law does not apply in the United States unless United States law incorporates the provision such as ratification of a treaty by the United States Congress.

Historically, the prevention and control of communicable diseases had been done by way of sanitation, safe water, meal supply, isolation, and immunization.

EBPH is the improvement, implementation, and assessment of powerful packages and guidelines in public fitness via the application of standards of clinical reasoning, such as systematic makes use of statistics and information structures and appropriate use of software making plans fashions.

Learn more about ratification here https://brainly.com/question/7458577

#SPJ4

Answer:

To enter into a binding contract, you have to be show that the presentation for the contract is made in a well label manner

Answer: hello the options related to your question is missing below is the missing option

a. not further a legitimate local interest.

b. not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out-of-state interests.

c. allow only direct, not incidental, regulation of interstate commerce.

d. impose costs on interstate commerce that are more excessive than necessary to bring about the state interests.

answer:

Not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out of state interests

( B )

Explanation:

The state statue must not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out of state interests,

The commerce clause as enshrined in the constitution during the Tenth amendment does not grant  the power to the states to regulate interstate economic activities without discrimination.  it also serves as a grant power to congress, hence the states where granted powers to regulate interstate commerce

Answer:

A create and pass a law

Explanation:

So what you want to do every question is take out the ones that dont make sence. Then you need to look what did you go over. Then you can start to get ride of answer if you aren't sure.

I hoped this helps you have a nice day!!

In order to spot probable criminal conduct, law enforcement agencies use predictive analytics based on mathematical models and other analytical approaches. This practice is known as "predictive policing."

Predictive policing can bias police personnel by spotlighting high- and low-risk neighborhoods, placing them on unnecessarily high alert or giving them a false sense of security. Predictive policing has an effect on neighborhood residents in addition to criminals and law enforcement personnel.

By designating the locations of greater crime rates, this novel technique aids law enforcement in ensuring the safety of a community. Predictive policing has advantages in improving crime prevention, improving decision-making, and advancing justice.

To know more about Predictive Policing visit:

brainly.com/question/24655820

#SPJ1

Answer:

A grand jury might not indict, but the prosecutor may still bring the defendant to trial if she has a strong enough case. Without a grand jury indictment, the prosecutor has to demonstrate to the trial that she has enough evidence t continue the case.

The Master Promissory Note (MPN) is a legal document that outlines the rights and responsibilities of a borrower and the lender when taking out a federal student loan.

When a student applies for a federal student loan, they must sign an MPN before receiving any loan funds. The MPN is a binding agreement between the borrower and the U.S. Department of Education that sets forth the terms and conditions of the loan, including interest rate, repayment period, and borrower rights.

The MPN specifies the borrower's rights and responsibilities, such as their obligation to repay the loan, how and when payments are made, and what happens if the borrower fails to make payments on time. The document also outlines the terms of the loan, such as the interest rate and any fees associated with the loan. The MPN is typically valid for 10 years, during which time the borrower can take out additional federal student loans without needing to sign a new MPN.

The MPN is an essential component of the student loan process and provides clarity to both borrowers and lenders about the terms of the loan. It ensures that both parties understand their rights and responsibilities and reduces confusion or disputes over loan terms. By signing the MPN, the borrower agrees to the terms and conditions of the loan and acknowledges their obligation to repay the loan in full, with interest.

Know more about Master Promissory Note here:

https://brainly.com/question/28165627

#SPJ11