NO LINKS!!!!!! NO RANDOM LETTERS FOR POINTS!!!!!!!!!
The map of a biking trail is drawn on a coordinate grid.
The trail starts at P(−2, 2) and goes to Q(5, 2).
It goes from Q to R(5, −5) and then to S(8, −5).
What is the total length (in units) of the biking trail?
a: 10
b: 16
c: 17
d: 18

The systems of inequalities given is,

Since he can't sell more than 8 items per day, then from the graph given the best region that should be shaded is region 4.

The equation y = 3/4x describes the relationship

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The graph

The graph is a linear graph, and we have the following points on the graph

(x, y) = (0, 0) and (4, 3)

Because the line passes through the origin i.e. (0, 0), the equation that describes the relationship is then represented as

y = Y/X * x

Where

(X, Y) = (4, 3)

So, we have

y = 3/4x

Hence, the equation is y = 3/4x

Read more about linear equations at

https://brainly.com/question/4074386

#SPJ1

Based on the provided question, it seems like you are asking about the most efficient evaluation method, either by hand or using a computer. To determine which method is the most suitable, you need to consider the complexity of the evaluation process and the number of alternatives.

Using a computer is generally faster and more accurate when dealing with large datasets or complex calculations. On the other hand, evaluating by hand may be more suitable for smaller datasets or simpler calculations. It can provide a more hands-on approach, allowing for a deeper understanding of the evaluation process. However, this method is generally more time-consuming and prone to human error.

To select the most appropriate evaluation method, consider the complexity of the task and the available resources. If the evaluation involves a large amount of data or complex calculations, using a computer would likely be the most efficient choice. However, if the task is relatively simple or involves a smaller dataset, evaluating by hand may suffice. In conclusion, the choice between evaluating by hand or using a computer depends on the complexity of the task and the available resources. Consider these factors to determine the most suitable method.

To know more about determine visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29898039

#SPJ11

Answer:

1/4×322.54

=80.635

round off

it's 80.64

1) Since this investment has been in an account with 12% compound interest per year, then we can write out the following:

a) Note that there was no withdrawal during this first year.

b) To find out the amount of money over a course of this time 2 years, then we can write out the following:

In this case, it is also compounded per year. Just the period (t) is greater than the other one.

So, we can tell the following about the earnings of this investment:

Answer:

B.

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

v=6t-6

integrating

s= 3t^2 -6t +k

5=3(1)^2 -6(1) +k

5-3+6=k

k=8

s(t) = 3t^2 -6t +8

Answer:

lesser x = -9, greater x = 10

Step-by-step explanation:

To factor the left side, we need to find two numbers that have a sum of -1 and a product of -90. These numbers are -10 and 9, therefore, the factored version of the left side will be (x - 10)(x + 9). The equation then becomes (x - 10)(x + 9) = 0. Next, we can use the Zero Product Property:

x - 10 = 0 or x + 9 = 0

x = 10 or x = -9

Answer:

N:ki n:kn:kNN

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Remember the maximum height will be at the vertex. The x value of the vertex is your time, so use x=-b/2a. Then if it had also asked what the height was, you would plug that answer into your equation to find the y value of the vertex. Pretty sure your teacher is just asking you to find the x though:)

Step-by-step explanation:

\(\longrightarrow{\green{3.13}}\) 

\(\sf \bf {\boxed {\mathbb {Step-by-step\:explanation:}}}\)

\( \frac{37.56}{12} \)

➺ \(\:3.13\)

\(\bold{ \green{ \star{ \orange{Mystique35\:ヅ}}}}⋆\)

Answer:

3.13

Step-by-step explanation:

sorry that is All what I can say please don't be mad at me

Answer:

the y-intercept, b, is 7

Step-by-step explanation:

Compare the given y = -3.1 +7 to y = mx + b.  I must assume that you meant

y = -3.1x +7.  It becomes evident that the slope, m, is -3.1 and the y-intercept, b, is 7.

For number 8 its the third one.

Answer:

for number 1 I think the answer is non-binomial: the trials are not independent.

for number 2 I think it's 0.015

The formula for finding the standard deviation for a binomial distribution is σ2=npq. f.

What means binomial distribution?

When each trial has the same probability of achieving a given value, the number of trials or observations is summarized using the binomial distribution.

For each random variable X, the binomial distribution formula is given by;

P(x:n,p) = nCx px (q)n-x

Where,

n = the number of experiments

x = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, …

p = Probability of Success in a single experiment

q = Probability of Failure in a single experiment = 1 – p

formula for finding standard deviation of a binomial distribution is npq. f.

To learn more about binomial distribution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14565246

#SPJ4

Answer:

x = 11

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

4(x - 7) = 2x - 6 ← distribute parenthesis on left side

4x - 28 = 2x - 6 ( subtract 2x from both sides )

2x - 28 = - 6 ( add 28 to both sides )

2x = 22 ( divide both sides by 2 )

x = 11

The reliability of a two-component product if the components are in parallel, with individual reliabilities of 0.95, and 0.80 is 0.99. The answer is option b.

The probability that a specific object will carry out its intended function for a specific amount of time under a specific set of circumstances without experiencing any failures is known as reliability.

The reliability definition is based on four criteria: function, fulfillment likelihood, duration, and environment. Maintainability and reliability are related because when a machine or product malfunctions, there may be a way to get it back into working order.

When we use the phrase "talking reliability-smart," we mean that any of the aspects that shape the device in parallel can be considered. This does not necessarily imply that they are physically parallel (in all circumstances), as parallel capacitors have a certain behavior in the circuit and may malfunction if one of them fails.

Parallel forms reliability is a measure of reliability obtained by giving the same set of people different versions of an assessment tool (each version must contain items that probe the same construct, talent, knowledge base, etc.

The complete question is given below:-

What is the reliability of a two-component product if the components are in parallel, with individual reliabilities of 0.95, and 0.80?

a. 0.875

b. 0.99

c. 0.95

d. 0.76

e. 0.80

Learn more about reliability here:

brainly.com/question/1265793

#SPJ4

Answer:

The answer is A

Step-by-step explanation:

I got it right

Answer:

Answer choice A is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm smort UwU

Answer:

A) the value is less than 67

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of g(x) + j(x) is 2x³ + 3x² + 2x -6.

Mathematical expressions consist of at least two numbers or variables, at least one arithmetic operation, and a statement. It's possible to multiply, divide, add, or subtract with this mathematical operation. An expression's basic components are a number or variable, a math operator, and another number or variable. An expression, often known as a mathematical expression, is a finite collection of symbols that are well-formed in accordance with context-dependent principles. 2x + 3 is an illustration of a mathematical expression with a variable. Each and every variable needs to have a coefficient, or a value multiplied by the variable. The number 2, which denotes 2 times plus x, is the coefficient of x in the formula 2x + 3.

Given,

Expression

g(x) = 2x² - 1

j(x) = 2x³ + x² + 2x - 5

g(x) + j(x).

Equating,

2x² - 1 + 2x³ + x² + 2x - 5

2x³ + 3x² + 2x -6

The value of g(x) + j(x) is 2x³ + 3x² + 2x -6.

To learn more about expression, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14083225

#SPJ13

The actual cost to see the game is $150, as that is the amount you paid for the ticket. The cost in this scenario can be considered an opportunity cost. By choosing to attend the game instead of selling the ticket for $400, you forgo the opportunity to earn that additional $400.

In this scenario, the cost of attending the game refers to the actual amount of money you spent on the ticket, which is $150. This is the out-of-pocket expense that directly affects your financial resources.

On the other hand, the opportunity cost is the potential benefit or value that you give up by choosing one option over another. In this case, if you had sold the ticket for $400, you would have received a higher amount of money, which represents the opportunity cost of attending the game. By deciding to go to the game, you forego the opportunity to earn that additional $400.

Opportunity cost is a concept in economics that emphasizes the value of the next best alternative forgone when making a decision. It helps assess the trade-offs involved in different choices and helps in evaluating the true cost of a decision beyond the immediate financial expenses.

To know more about actual cost,

https://brainly.com/question/30552529

#SPJ11

The time complexity average of this problem is O(n³). It involves three nested loops, each loop iterating n times. Therefore, the time complexity is O(n³).

The time complexity of this problem is O(n³). This problem involves three nested loops, each loop iterating n times. This means that the problem requires at least O(n³) time to complete. In the outer loop, which is the first loop, the value of i is initialized to 1 and then the loop iterates n times, meaning that the outer loop requires O(n) time. In the second loop, which is the nested loop, the value of j is initialized to 1 and then the loop iterates n times, meaning that the second loop requires O(n) time. In the third loop, which is the innermost loop, the value of k is initialized to 1 and then the loop iterates n times, meaning that the third loop requires O(n) time. Since the three loops are nested, the total time complexity of this problem is the product of the time complexities of the three loops, which is O(n³). Therefore, the time complexity of this problem is O(n³).

Learn more about average here

https://brainly.com/question/24057012

#SPJ4

Given: the three points are plotted on graph.

For the first point it is observed that,

For the x =3/2 the value is y=6/2

For second point ,

For x= 9/2 the y value is y=12/2

For the third point ,

For x= 15/2 the y value is y=18/2

According to obtained information it matched to option J)

Answer: Option J)

Answer:

Amy is (21.6 - 14.4) 7.2 km/hr faster than Bill.

Distance = speed / time

Amy's speed

40 minutes = 40/60 = 2/3 hours

14.4 = speed / 2/3

Speed = 14.4 * 3/2 = 21.6 km/ hr

Bill speed

60 minutes = 1 hour

Speed = 14.4 km / hr.

Answer:

178.3 mm²

Explanation:

The surface area of the regular pyramid is equal to the sum of the base and lateral areas:()

Answer:

- 7x + 3

Step-by-step explanation:

2x - 9x + 13 - 10

- 7x + 13 - 10

- 7x + 3

Answer:

1.  You can prove that a line parallel to one side of a triangle divides the other 2 sides proportionally by using the Triangle Proportionality Theorem.  

2. You prove the base angles are congruent by constructing the angle bisector through the vertex angle of an isosceles triangle. By constructing the angle bisector, we designed two congruent triangles and then used CPCTC to show that the base angles are congruent.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

56.52mm

Step-by-step explanation:

first we need to find the circumference of the wheel, which equals 2*pi*r

then we divide the circumference by 25 since the wheel is split into 25 arcs by the 25 spokes, so our answer is:

2(3.14)(225)/(25) = 56.52mm

Answer: x= 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

120 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's assume that the length of the field is x feet. Then, according to the problem statement, the width of the field is (x - 20) feet.

The area of a rectangle is given by the formula A = length x width. So, we can write:

x(x - 20) = 12,000

Expanding the left-hand side, we get:

x^2 - 20x = 12,000

Bringing all the terms to one side, we have:

x^2 - 20x - 12,000 = 0

Now, we can solve this quadratic equation using the quadratic formula:

x = (-(-20) ± sqrt((-20)^2 - 4(1)(-12,000))) / (2(1))

x = (20 ± sqrt(20^2 + 48,000)) / 2

x = (20 ± 220) / 2

We discard the negative root, since a length cannot be negative, and we get:

x = 120

Therefore, the length of the field is 120 feet.