need help please asap

Contrasts in texts: Pericles presents government as a unique example, not to be imitated by neighboring governments. Equal justice in private disputes, but public service rewards merit.

Contrasts  In Xenophon:

In Sparta, powerful individuals honor and submit to magistrates. In Sparta, magistrates have immediate authority to punish lawbreakers, unlike other states where officials rule unchecked.

Citizenship in Sparta granted based on adherence to laws, not strength or wealth. Lazy rule-breakers lose privileges, emphasizing equality and consequences.

Learn more about government  from

https://brainly.com/question/1078669

#SPJ1

What is being contrasted?

Text of the Contrast

Contrasts in Pericles

Our government does not copy our neighbors', but is an example to them.

But while there exists equal justice to all and alike in their private disputes, the claim of excellence is also recognized

...preferred to the public service, not as a matter of privilege, but as the reward of merit.

Contrasts in Xenophon

... in other state, the more influential men are not willing even to appear to fear the magistrates, but think that such fear is unbecoming free men; but in Sparta, the most powerful men not only put themselves under the magistrates, but even count it an honour to humble themselves before them,

Start typing here...

... the most powerful men not only put themselves under the magistrates, but even count it an honour to humble themselves before them, and to obey, when they are called upon, not walking, but running

Being possessed of such authority, they do not, like the

magistrates in other states, always permit those who are elected to offices to rule during the whole year as they choose, but, like despots and presidents in gymnastic contests, punish on the instant whomsoever they find acting at all contrary to the laws.

...for [Lycurgus] made the privileges of citizenship equally available to all those who observed what was enjoined by the laws, without taking any account either of weakness of body or scantiness of means; but if any one was too indolent to perform what the laws prescribed, Lycurgus appointed that he should be no longer counted in the number of equally privileged citizens.

This excerpt describes the great festivities in New York celebrating the completion of the Erie Canal. Festivities included a water parade on Seneca Main Canal boats. Governor Clinton signaled the confluence of the waters by pouring two barrels of water from Lake Erie into the sea.

The cities mentioned in the excerpt are Buffalo, Albany, and New York City. The Erie Canal provided a direct water route from the Great Lakes to the Atlantic Ocean, which facilitated the transportation of goods and people, reduced travel time and costs, and opened up new markets for trade.

Governor Clinton's symbolic action symbolized the economic and cultural connections that the canal made possible, and the unity of the nation.

This document describes the celebration held for the completion of the Erie Canal, which is a significant engineering and transportation achievement of the 19th century.

The object I just studied may be related to this document in terms of its historical context or the technological advances that it represents.

learn more about Erie Canal: https://brainly.com/question/24602911

#SPJ1

He won the loyalty of many people through great skill is the statement describes Genghis Khan rose to unite the Mongol clans. Thus, option (b) is correct.

Kublai Khan was the grandson of Genghis Khan and controlled the Mongol Empire for 30 years. In the modern-day countries of China and Mongolia, Kublai Khan established the Yuan dynasty. He was the major control on the Mongol Empire.

According to the Genghis Khan was the believed on the religious freedom, encouraged trade, he was the launched the international postal system and the abolished torture. It was the loyalty of many people through great skill in the period of the Mongol clans.

As a result, the significance of the Genghis Khan are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (b) is correct.

Learn more about on Genghis Khan, here:

https://brainly.com/question/1845312

#SPJ6

Answer:

20th Amendment indicates the beginning and the ending dates of presidential and congressional terms

25th Amendment addresses what happens to the presidency and vice-presidency if the president or/and vice president dies, resigns, or becomes disabled.

  1.

The 20th Amendment is an addition to the U.S. Constitution provision which sets the inauguration date for presidential tenure as well as for Congress as well.

The 25th Amendment was enacted by the Congress following the assassination of President John Kennedy.

Learn more about this here

brainly.com/question/1588614

brainly.com/question/20072874

Answer:

2

4

5

Explanation:

these are based off of my personal experience, PLEASE FACT CHECK THESE ANSWER CHOICES, but id be wiling to bet these are it, if not feel free to let me know and ill see what i can do

 -AW747

Answer: increased from 8,175,133 in April of 2010 to 8,398,748 in July of 2018. This is an increase of about 224,000 residents over the 2010 mark, or 2.7 percent.

Explanation:

Hoped these helped and merry Christmas

Answer: increased from 8,175,133 in April of 2010 to 8,398,748 in July of 2018. This is an increase of about 224,000 residents over the 2010 mark, or 2.7 percent.

Explanation:

Hoped these helped and merry Christmas

Answer:W.E.B. Du Bois was the first African American to receive a Ph.D. from Harvard University (1895).

The first case study of an African American community was conducted by W.E.B. Du Bois, published as The Philadelphia Negro: A Social Study (1899).

W.E.B. Du Bois co-founded the NAACP in 1909.

Explanation:

np

Answer:

here it is

Explanation:

Both kinds of priests are ordained and can administer the sacraments and celebrate Mass. They all have an essential role in the Body of Christ to carry out the ministries of his Church

Answer:

what makes you beautiful

Answer:

i love all of their songs, my favorite favorite favorite is fool's gold

Explanation:

Answer:

The most impactful part of Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech is likely the repetition and emotional delivery of the phrase "I have a dream" and the imagery it evokes of a future in which racial equality has been achieved. The speech, which was delivered on August 28, 1963, during the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, was a call for an end to racism and discrimination against African Americans in the United States.

In the speech, King draws on the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, as well as the Bible, to argue that all people, regardless of race, are entitled to the same rights and opportunities. He also emphasizes the importance of nonviolent protest and peaceful civil disobedience in the struggle for civil rights.

King likely wrote this speech at this time because it was a pivotal moment in the Civil Rights Movement. The March on Washington was one of the largest civil rights rallies in history, and it brought together more than 200,000 people, including representatives of many different ethnic and religious groups, to demand equal rights for African Americans. King's speech was a powerful call to action that helped to galvanize support for the Civil Rights Movement and to inspire future generations to continue the struggle for equality and justice.

Explanation:

Answer: King's “Dream” speech would play an important role in helping pass the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and the pivotal Selma to Montgomery march that he led in 1965 would provide momentum for the passage later that year of the Voting Rights Act.

Explanation: Because they weren't allowed to vote.

Answer:

Short simple and to the point

Explanation:

Both countries are close to each other so i assume they are using the same government

i dont know, but i hope this helps

Answer:

lived in social groups

made tools

hunted large animals

wore clothing

buried their dead

All of the above are evidence that suggests Neanderthals were similar to present-day humans. They lived in social groups, made tools, hunted large animals, wore clothing, and buried their dead.

Use of metal tools and building boats is not a evidence that suggests Neanderthals were similar to present-day humans, as Neanderthals lived before the time of metal tools and boats.

Answer:

I believe that the states should have power.

Explanation:

because as it states in the constitutions preamble,

We the people of the United States in order to form a more perfect union establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty.

Answer:

Planning a neighborhood recycling program

Explanation:

A common good should help benefit yourself and your community!

I hope this helped! :)

Answer: probably planning a neighborhood recycling program :)

Explanation:

Answer: 12

Explanation: The facctors they have in common are 2 x 2 x 3. Multiply those and you have 12.

Answer:

12

Explanation:

12*7=84

12*3=36

Answer:

Explanation:Egypt is a country located in northeastern Africa and southwestern Asia. It has a rich and fascinating history that spans over 5000 years. Here are some key points about Egypt's history:

1. Ancient Egypt: The civilization of Ancient Egypt emerged around 3100 BC and lasted until 30 BC when it was conquered by Rome. It is known for its impressive monuments like the Pyramids of Giza, the Sphinx, and the Temple of Karnak. The Egyptians were also famous for their hieroglyphic writing system, which is one of the oldest in the world.

2. Pharaohs: The Ancient Egyptians were ruled by a series of pharaohs, who were considered to be divine kings. Some of the most famous pharaohs include King Tutankhamun, Ramses II, and Cleopatra.

3. Religion: The Ancient Egyptians had a complex polytheistic religion that included many gods and goddesses. They believed in an afterlife and spent a great deal of time and resources preparing for it.

4. Greek and Roman Rule: After the conquest of Egypt by Alexander the Great in 332 BC, Egypt came under Greek rule. Later, it was conquered by Rome in 30 BC and became a Roman province.

5. Islamic Conquest: In 641 AD, Arab Muslims conquered Egypt and brought Islam to the region. Egypt became a center of Islamic learning and scholarship.

6. Ottoman Rule: Egypt was ruled by the Ottoman Empire from 1517 to 1798 when Napoleon Bonaparte invaded Egypt. The French occupation was brief, and Egypt was returned to Ottoman rule.

7. British Occupation: In 1882, Egypt was occupied by British forces and remained under British rule until 1952 when it gained independence.

8. Modern Egypt: Since gaining independence, Egypt has had a turbulent history marked by political instability, economic challenges, and social unrest. Despite these challenges, Egypt remains an important cultural and historical center in the world.

These are just a few key points about Egypt's history. There is much more to learn about this fascinating country and its rich heritage.

Answer:

Hie..! Here's the answer

Egypt, country located in the northeastern corner of Africa. Egypt’s heartland, the Nile River valley and delta, was the home of one of the principal civilizations of the ancient Middle East and, like Mesopotamia farther east, was the site of one of the world’s earliest urban and literate societies. Pharaonic Egypt thrived for some 3,000 years through a series of native dynasties that were interspersed with brief periods of foreign rule. After Alexander the Great conquered the region in 323 BCE, urban Egypt became an integral part of the Hellenistic world. Under the Greek Ptolemaic dynasty, an advanced literate society thrived in the city of Alexandria, but what is now Egypt was conquered by the Romans in 30 BCE. It remained part of the Roman Republic and Empire and then part of Rome’s successor state, the Byzantine Empire, until its conquest by Arab Muslim armies in 639–642 CE.

Until the Muslim conquest, great continuity had typified Egyptian rural life. Despite the incongruent ethnicity of successive ruling groups and the cosmopolitan nature of Egypt’s larger urban centres, the language and culture of the rural, agrarian masses—whose lives were largely measured by the annual rise and fall of the Nile River, with its annual inundation—had changed only marginally throughout the centuries. Following the conquests, both urban and rural culture began to adopt elements of Arab culture, and an Arabic vernacular eventually replaced the Egyptian language as the common means of spoken discourse. Moreover, since that time, Egypt’s history has been part of the broader Islamic world, and though Egyptians continued to be ruled by foreign elite—whether Arab, Kurdish, Circassian, or Turkish—the country’s cultural milieu remained predominantly Arab.

Hope it helped uh!!

Thanks ✨

Answer:

Hey! Sure thing :)

Explanation:

Sepoys- An Indian soldier serving under British or other European orders.

Hope this helps!

Have a nice day <3

Explanation:

I am cooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool

The strict rules of jati affected many indian lives including arranged marriages because:

Arranged marriages are challenging since there is no mutual connection of a love aspect and each spouse is unaware of who they are by attitude, decision, or personality attribute.

The laws established in the Jati social system give one system greater privilege than the other, and one system level is treated worse than the other.

For example, more education was given to boys who were wealthier or came from prominent families depending on the social system, Which makes it untruthful for other boys who aren't able to receive education from guru's because of wealth, but also causing the laws of jati to generate a disagreement about who had more privilege than the other.

Verwoerd was an authoritarian, socially conservative leader and an Afrikaner nationalist. He was a member of the Afrikaner Broederbond, an exclusively white and Christian Calvinist secret organization dedicated to advancing the Afrikaner "volk" interests, and like many members of the organization had verbally supported Germany during World War II. Broederbond members like Verwoerd would assume high positions in government upon the Nationalist electoral victory in 1948 and come to wield a profound influence on public and civil society throughout the apartheid era in South Africa.

Verwoerd's desire to ensure white, and especially Afrikaner dominance in South Africa, to the exclusion of the country's nonwhite majority, was a major aspect of his support for a republic (though removing the British monarchy was long a nationalist aspiration anyway). To that same end, Verwoerd greatly expanded apartheid.[citation needed] He branded the system as a policy of "good-neighborliness", stating that different races and cultures could only reach their full potential if they lived and developed apart from each other, avoiding potential cultural clashes,[neutrality is disputed] and that the white minority had to be protected from the majority non-white in South Africa by pursuing a "policy of separate development" namely apartheid and keeping power firmly in the hands of whites.[citation needed] Given Verwoerd's background as a social science academic, he attempted to justify apartheid on ethical and philosophical grounds. This system however saw the complete disfranchisement of the nonwhite population.[2]

Verwoerd heavily repressed opposition to apartheid during his premiership. He ordered the detention and imprisonment of tens of thousands of people and the exile of further thousands, while at the same time greatly empowering, modernizing, and enlarging the white apartheid state's security forces (police and military). He banned black organizations such as the African National Congress and the Pan Africanist Congress, and it was under him that future president Nelson Mandela was imprisoned for life for sabotage.[3][4] Verwoerd's South Africa had one of the highest prison populations in the world and saw a large number of executions and floggings. By the mid-1960s Verwoerd's government to a large degree had put down internal civil resistance to apartheid by employing extraordinary legislative power, draconian laws, psychological intimidation, and the relentless efforts of the white state's security forces.

Apartheid as a program began in 1948 with D. F. Malan's premiership, but it was Verwoerd's large role in its formulation and his efforts to place it on a firmer legal and theoretical footing, including his opposition to even the limited form of integration known as baasskap, that have led him to be dubbed the "Architect of Apartheid". His actions prompted the passing of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1761, condemning apartheid, and ultimately leading to South Africa's international isolation and economic sanctions. On 6 September 1966, Verwoerd was stabbed several times by parliamentary aide Dimitri Tsafendas. He died shortly after, and Tsafendas was jailed until his death in 1999.

The prime minister of the Africa gave the speech regarding the education of black Africans, in his speech he told that there should be the equal education between the black Africans and whites.

Hendrik Verwoerd, the Minister of Native Affairs, claimed that the goal was to solve South Africa's “ethnic problems” by creating complementary economic and political units.

It is frequently claimed that the Bantu (African) education policy was intended to direct black or non-white youth to the unskilled labor market.

The African Prime Minister delivered a speech on black African education, in which he stated that black and white Africans should have equal education.

Therefore, there was the starting of equal education among the Americans, black and white man's.

Learn more about the education, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/22517654

#SPJ2

Answer:

While some argue that the use of atomic bombs was necessary to end the war quickly and save lives, others believe that it was a disproportionate and unnecessary act of violence that caused immense human suffering. The debate over the justification of the bombings continues to this day.

Explanation:

Answer:

The United States dropping the atomic bombs on Japan was not justifiable, since history has proven many times over that solving long term issues through violence will only most likely result in one of two solutions. The anger against each side lasts for at least as long as the issue was around. Or the other, it will be 'solved' for a short time, and even then will it only come back to more disagreements among the people, causing more violence, or better, just verbal debates and disagreements, although that rarely happens in large issues among nations.

When the US dropped the bombs, they were expecting a quick surrender of Japan, although it would have been better with less violence, talking it out, or even a smaller-range bomb, that wouldn't kill so much of the population and destroy so much land. The United States dropped the bomb for a personal benefit of a lower amount of American lives lost, contradicting the idea amongst most people to preserve all human life, and prevent death from occurring as much as possible. The action was personally considered an 'allegation', not legally, among many people; many others believe that it was necessary and justifiable. It would be difficult to gainsay others opinions on this matter, although you can certainly attempt to proselytize.

Partial Rebuttal for a more beneficial answer:

After dropping the first bomb, Japan had still not surrendered, enticing the United States to repeat the action. To have two bombs dropped on your own country after being warned would most likely make you want to surrender or obey the warring nation. In the end, it turned out to be a gain for the United States, and a great loss for Japan, basically the overall idea of the people of the United States.

Answer:History is full of facts

Explanation:

Answer:

Euphrates and the Tigris!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Explanation:

Answer:

Tigris and Euphrates

Explanation:

Its modern name comes from the Greek for middle—mesos—and river—potamos—and literally means a “country between two rivers.” Those two rivers are the Tigris and Euphrates