Name one of your personal stressors. How do you manage it?
Answers
Answer:
I get stressed when I can't understand certain things and why they happen
and so I just try to believe that it happens for a reason
Explanation:
Answer:
I get stressed when I can't understand certain things and why they happen and so I just try to believe that it happens for a reason.
Explanation:
E2020
Related Questions
Yo I'm doing an assignment on misdemeanors. I'm trying to prove why we shouldn't remove jail time for 1st-degree misdemeanors, what are some good reasons why?
Answers
Judy, a healthcare office manager, has misplaced a flash drive that contained protected health
information including social security numbers and diagnoses. What type of rules or laws does this
violate and what might be the consequences for Judy and her employer?
Type your answer here.
Answers
Misplacing a flash drive containing protected health information violates the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) privacy and security rules.
What does this rule require?The HIPAA Security Rule requires healthcare organizations to implement administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to protect electronic protected health information.
The HIPAA Privacy Rule requires healthcare organizations to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of protected health information.
Judy and her employer may face severe consequences for the breach, including financial penalties and damage to their reputation. They may also be required to notify affected individuals and take corrective actions to prevent future breaches.
Read more about rule violations here:
https://brainly.com/question/10861206
#SPJ1
James and his husband Edward both work for local companies. The company James works for is experiencing financial difficulties. He is offered a better position with a company 400 miles away. Edward is doing very well in his job and would rather not move. How do they decide what to do? Who has the legal right to make the final decision? Who should have that right?
Answers
Both of James and Edward would have the legal right to make the decision on if to move or not to move.
Who has the legal rights here:The decision on whether to move or not is ultimately a personal one for James and Edward to make together. They should have an open and honest conversation about their goals, preferences, and priorities, and work together to find a solution that works for both of them. They may want to consider factors such as their career aspirations, financial situation, family obligations, and quality of life in making this decision.
In terms of legal rights, both James and Edward have the right to make decisions regarding their own employment and career paths. James has the right to accept or decline the job offer from the company 400 miles away, and Edward has the right to continue working in his current position if he chooses to do so. Neither of them has the right to make a decision that would force the other to give up their job or make significant sacrifices that they are not willing to make.
Read more on legal rights here;https://brainly.com/question/28222689
#SPJ1
Answer:
James and Edward equally
Explanation:
who makes the us energy policy
Answers
Answer:
The energy policy of the United States is determined by federal, state, and local entities in the ... Prius may cost much less than the current model. Larger advanced-technology batteries have been suggested to make it plug-in rechargeable
In Pennsylvania, do citizens have the rights to file a lawsuit or press charges against someone who recorded you without any consent.
(NO FAKE ANSWERS)
Answers
Answer:
Pennsylvania recording law stipulates that it is a two-party consent state. In Pennsylvania, it is a criminal offense to use any device to record communications, whether they're wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of everyone taking part in the conversation.
You have a right to capture images in public places, but you don't always have a right to record what people say. Pennsylvania's Wiretap Law makes it illegal to record private conversations - which can include conversations in public places - without the consent of all parties to the conversation.
Explanation:
so Yes and no.
IF this is a question for an assignment or something i would put yes you can.
Please help ASAP !
Which historical event BEST demonstrates the operation of checks and balances?
A) The Senate approved the appointment of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court.
B) South Carolina seceded from the Union over the issues of slavery and States rights.
C) President George Washington used the Army to suppress a tax rebellion by Pennsylvania farmers.
D) President Dwight D. Eisenhower sent Federal troops to enforce the integration of public schools in Little Rock, Arkansas.
Answers
Answer:
A, the senate approved the appointment of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court.
Explanation:
Examine the group of photos shown on page 347. For each photo, answer te following questions:
Is this family? Why or why not?
Is this living arrangement common where you live?
How does the law affect this living arrangement?
What are the characteristics of a family? How would you define the term family?
Are divorced spouses still a family? Would you answer differently depending on whether they have children? If a parent remarries?
Answers
A family is any two or more people who live together and are connected by blood, marriage, or adoption; all of these people are regarded as belonging to the same family.
What is the role of the family?Families have a key role in social development as the fundamental and indispensable building blocks of society. They are primarily responsible for the upbringing, education, and socialization of children as well as for teaching civic virtues and a sense of community.
Family supports us during both the best and worst of times, which makes these ties crucial. Family is crucial because it can provide unconditional love, support, and stability. They always strive to see and bring out the best in you, even when you are unable to do so for yourself.
Learn more about a family here:
https://brainly.com/question/10205802
#SPJ1
Who appoints Ambassadors?
a) the president, with the advice and consent of the Senate
b) the supreme court
c) the president alone
d)the president, with the advice and consent of the house of representatives
Answers
Answer number one and two thank you !
Answers
Q1. To run for President of the United States, a person must meet the following three constitutional requirements:
1. Be a natural-born citizen of the United States.
2. Be at least 35 years old.
3. Have been a resident of the United States for at least 14 years.
These requirements are outlined in Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.
Q2.There are likely multiple factors that have contributed to the fact that most presidents to date have been white men. One possible factor is historical discrimination and exclusion of women and minority groups from positions of power and leadership. This has limited the pool of potential candidates and made it more difficult for individuals from underrepresented groups to gain the necessary experience and qualifications to run for president. Additionally, cultural and societal biases and stereotypes may have played a role in shaping public perceptions of who is "fit" to be president and limiting opportunities for candidates who do not fit those perceptions.
TVD fans only!
Can someone please tell me why they portrayed Kai’s mental abuse and neglect as a joke? Bro my mans Kai deserved way better...
Answers
Based on your reading of the following description of the confusion caused by public-private partnerships, what is the best summary statement of the issue?
Private security services have grown in number, profitability and importance over the past decade. The 2001 terror attacks on New York and Washington, D.C. robbed many Americans of a sense of security and, as a result, a market was created for private security services that reintroduced a sense of safety and well-being. Traditionally, communities looked to their local police department to provide the appropriate level of security and safety. Those communities lacking the financial resources to increase significantly the number of police officers regularly patrolling the streets turned to private security contractors to fill the gap between the current strength of the police department and the level of security the community identified as necessary and appropriate. The result has been the creation of a number of public-private partnerships that result in an often uneasy alliance between police departments and private security firms. While there are a number of factors that distinguish the sworn law enforcement officer from his or her private security counterpart, none is more significant than their respective obligations to uphold the provisions of the Constitution. If the roles and responsibilities of private security personnel are to continue to grow in importance to local communities, it will become increasingly important to determine whether these citizen police share the same ethical and legal responsibility to protect individual rights as the sworn police officer.
Responses
Since 9/11, private security groups are much more active in taking on police force tasks in attempts to control threats to national security.
Since 9/11, private security groups are much more active in taking on police force tasks in attempts to control threats to national security.
Since 9/11, the boundaries between the states have disappeared and the federal government has declared, in times of national disaster, all state private security agencies are deputized to act as law enforcement.
Since 9/11, the boundaries between the states have disappeared and the federal government has declared, in times of national disaster, all state private security agencies are deputized to act as law enforcement.
Since 9/11, the manner in which private security assists public forces to control order and security in the United States has broadened which makes responsibility boundaries less clear, but it opens access for more trained protection services at times of state or to federal threat.
Since 9/11, the manner in which private security assists public forces to control order and security in the United States has broadened which makes responsibility boundaries less clear, but it opens access for more trained protection services at times of state or to federal threat.
Since 9/11, the Constitution, the federal government, the states’ law enforcement and city forces have authority to request assistance from private security whose training allows them to act as police in national disasters.
Answers
Based on the reading of the following description of the confusion caused by public-private partnerships, the best summary statement of the issue is that the roles and responsibilities of private security personnel have expanded in importance to local communities, leading to an often uneasy alliance between police departments and private security firms, which raises questions about whether they share the same ethical and legal responsibility to protect individual rights as the sworn police officer.
The passage describes the growing importance of private security services after the 9/11 terror attacks, which created a market for private security services to reintroduce a sense of safety and well-being.
Private security contractors have been employed by communities lacking financial resources to increase the number of police officers patrolling the streets, leading to the creation of public-private partnerships that result in an often uneasy alliance between police departments and private security firms.
The passage highlights the significance of the obligations of the sworn law enforcement officer and the private security personnel in upholding the provisions of the Constitution.
If the roles and responsibilities of private security personnel are to continue to grow in importance to local communities, it will become increasingly important to determine whether they share the same ethical and legal responsibility to protect individual rights as the sworn police officer.
Hence, the correct answer is that the roles and responsibilities of private security personnel have expanded in importance to local communities, leading to an often uneasy alliance between police departments and private security firms, which raises questions about whether they share the same ethical and legal responsibility to protect individual rights as the sworn police officer.
For more question on police departments
https://brainly.com/question/26085524
#SPJ8
State two risks and two benefits from the collaboration between private military services and the U.S. military. In a summary sentence, show a way for the U.S. government and its citizens to live with the risks.
Answers
Answer:
Two risks of collaboration between private military services and the U.S. military include a lack of accountability and potential conflicts of interest. Private military services may prioritize profits over the safety and well-being of U.S. military personnel and civilians, leading to unethical or even illegal actions.
Two benefits of collaboration between private military services and the U.S. military include access to specialized expertise and technology, as well as the ability to supplement and support the U.S. military in times of need.
To live with the risks, the U.S. government can implement regulations and oversight to ensure that private military services are held accountable for their actions and prioritize the safety and well-being of U.S. military personnel and civilians. Additionally, the government can work to increase transparency and limit conflicts of interest to prevent private military services from putting profits ahead of ethical considerations.
Andre is investigating a crime scene where a home has been broken into and the homeowner, who lives alone, reported being robbed while eating her
breakfast. On the counter is a plate with a half-eaten piece of toast and the contents of the victim's purse strewn about with her wallet missing. Both
windows are open but the screens are intact and there is a second half-full cup of coffee on the counter near the sink. The question Andre wants to
answer in the first step of the scientific method is "Was someone else in the house?" What research might he conduct?
O A.
B.
O C. taste the coffee
OD.
search the purse contents
test the second coffee cup for DNA
call the neighbors to see if anyone else was broken in to
Reset
Next
Answers
A research might he conduct was C. Call the neighbors to see if anyone else was broken into .
Andre can conduct the following research:
A. Test the second coffee cup for DNA: Andre can collect the second coffee cup and send it for DNA analysis. If the DNA profiles on the cup do not match the homeowner's, it would indicate the presence of someone else in the house during the incident.B. Search the purse contents: Andre can carefully examine the contents of the victim's purse for any additional evidence. He can look for items that do not belong to the homeowner, such as identification cards or personal belongings of another individual, suggesting the presence of someone else.C. Call the neighbors to see if anyone else was broken into: Andre can interview the neighbors to gather information about any suspicious activities or individuals seen around the victim's house during the time of the incident. This could provide potential leads regarding the presence of someone else in the house.While tasting the coffee (Option C) may provide some information, it is not a reliable scientific method for determining if someone else was in the house. It is important to prioritize the collection of physical evidence before disturbing the scene by tasting or consuming items.For more such questions on Research
https://brainly.com/question/28831464
#SPJ8
Someone else can drive your car if _____.
A. you have proof of residency
B. they have proof of insurance
C. they have proof of residency
D. you have proof of insurance
Answers
Answer: B.
Explanation:
Option B states that someone else can drive your car if they have proof of insurance. This means that if the person who wants to drive your car can provide valid proof that they have insurance coverage, they are allowed to drive your car. Insurance coverage is important as it protects against potential accidents or damages that may occur while driving the vehicle. By requiring proof of insurance, it ensures that the driver is financially responsible and covered in case of any incidents. This requirement helps protect both the driver and the owner of the car.
Which statement best explains why the government serves as the plaintiff in a criminal case?
Crime affects society, so it is the government’s responsibility to bring cases against defendants to deal with them as harshly as possible.
Individuals are never directly harmed by violations of the law, so they cannot be plaintiffs in criminal cases.
A crime is a violation of the law, which was made and enforced by the government, not individuals.
Individual plaintiffs might know the defendant and therefore cannot be impartial in charging them with a crime.
Answers
Explanation:
I think that all the statements are correct. Government are the law makers. They make law and rules for the welfare of human beings. If someone does wrong and violates those rules and law then it is the right and duty of the government to punish the wrong-doers. That is why I think that the statements "Crime affects society, so it is the government’s responsibility to bring cases against defendants to deal with them as harshly as possible",
"Individuals are never directly harmed by violations of the law, so they cannot be plaintiffs in criminal cases"
"A crime is a violation of the law, which was made and enforced by the government, not individuals" and "Individual plaintiffs might know the defendant and therefore cannot be impartial in charging them with a crime" are right. We are able to live peacefully because of the government. We are able to have rights, feel safe and change the rules and boundaries made by the SOCIETY all thanks to the government. Yes there are some cases where the government's judgement are doubted or are proved wrong. But that doesn't mean that the government in every country does the same and is unfair.
I should have chose one answer as mentioned but I think that each of the statement is right.
Answer:
c:A crime is a violation of the law, which was made and enforced by the government, not individuals.
Explanation:
Investigating careers
which of the following allows the person to have a normal job while also serving in the armed forces?
A. National Guard
B. Navy
C. Air Force
D. Coast Guard
Answers
The National Guard allows individuals to have a normal job while serving in the armed forces (option a).
1. The National Guard is the option that allows individuals to have a normal job while serving in the armed forces.
2. The Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard are branches of the military that require full-time commitment without the possibility of a civilian job.
3. However, the National Guard is a unique reserve component of the United States Armed Forces that operates in both a federal and state capacity.
4. National Guard members typically serve part-time, usually one weekend per month and two weeks during the summer, allowing them to maintain civilian employment.
5. In times of need, such as during a natural disaster or in times of war, National Guard members can be called upon to serve on active duty.
6. While on active duty, National Guard members receive the same benefits and responsibilities as full-time active-duty personnel.
7. Once the active duty period is over, National Guard members return to their civilian jobs and continue with their normal lives.
8. This unique arrangement provides individuals the opportunity to serve their country while also pursuing a civilian career.
For more such questions on armed forces, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/14542723
#SPJ8
Maya was on shift last week during the police department holiday party. She took a
bunch of photos of her coworkers in uniform enjoying the event. They played games
and ate a lot of holiday food. Maya wants to post these pictures on one of her social
media profiles. Why should Maya NOT post these photos?
They show information that could be considered sensitive.
There are people in the images that she isn't friends with.
She isn't in uniform during the party.
Citizen journalists might see the images.
Answers
Maya should not post these photos for several reasons. Firstly, the photos may contain information that could be considered sensitive. As the holiday party took place at the police department, there may be certain aspects of the event that should remain confidential or not be shared publicly. This could include details about the police department's operations, protocols, or internal dynamics. Posting such sensitive information could compromise the security and integrity of the department.
Secondly, if there are people in the images that Maya isn't friends with, it would be respectful to consider their privacy and seek their consent before sharing their images online. People may have different preferences regarding their online presence, and it is important to respect their boundaries and rights.
Thirdly, the fact that Maya isn't in uniform during the party raises questions about the appropriateness of posting these images. If Maya is not in uniform, it may be more difficult for viewers to distinguish between personal and official contexts. This could potentially blur the lines between her personal and professional life, which may not be desirable or appropriate.
Lastly, Maya should consider the potential audience of her social media profile. Citizen journalists or individuals with various intentions might come across the images. It is important to be mindful of how these images could be interpreted or misused by others. Maintaining a level of discretion and professionalism when sharing content related to work events is crucial.
Overall, Maya should exercise caution and discretion when deciding whether or not to post these photos. Respecting the sensitivity of the information, obtaining consent, considering the context, and being mindful of potential viewers are all important factors to consider in order to avoid any unintended consequences.
for more questions on department
https://brainly.com/question/30678414
#SPJ11
Who Was First King Of Nepal
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The first king of Nepal was King Prithvi Narayan Shah. He was born on January 11, 1723, and ruled from 1768 until his death in 1775. King Prithvi Narayan Shah was the founder of the modern Kingdom of Nepal and the Shah dynasty, which ruled Nepal until 2008 when the country became a federal democratic republic. He is widely regarded as a unifying figure and is credited with the unification of Nepal and the establishment of Nepal as a sovereign kingdom.
Distinguish between the concepts of governmental crime, state crime, and political white collar crime. Identify as well the special significance of the following concepts: abuse of power, corruption, bribery, and political scandal. In what respects are the first set of concepts controversial, and how do they relate to the traditional concept of white collar crime? Why has governmental crime been relatively neglected by criminologists?
Answers
1. Governmental Crime: Governmental crime refers to criminal activities committed by individuals or groups within the government or associated with government functions. This can include illegal actions such as abuse of power, human rights violations, illegal surveillance, and misconduct by government officials.
2. State Crime: State crime involves illegal actions that are perpetrated or sanctioned by the state itself. This includes crimes committed in the pursuit of state policies or interests, such as war crimes, genocide, torture, and state-sponsored terrorism.
3. Political White-Collar Crime: Political white-collar crime refers to illegal activities committed by individuals in positions of political power or influence, often involving financial fraud, bribery, embezzlement, or other forms of corruption. These crimes typically occur in political contexts and involve abuses of power for personal or political gain.
The concepts of abuse of power, corruption, bribery, and political scandal have special significance within these contexts:
- Abuse of Power: This refers to the misuse of authority or position for personal or political gain, often involving actions that violate laws, policies, or ethical norms.
- Corruption: Corruption involves the misuse of public power for private gain. It includes actions such as bribery, embezzlement, nepotism, and favoritism, which undermine the integrity and fairness of government institutions.
- Bribery: Bribery involves offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting something of value as a means to influence the actions or decisions of a person in a position of power or authority.
- Political Scandal: Political scandals typically involve public exposure and scrutiny of unethical or illegal activities by individuals or groups in the political sphere. These scandals can damage reputations, erode public trust, and have far-reaching political consequences.
The first set of concepts, particularly governmental crime and state crime, can be controversial for several reasons:
1. Lack of Consensus: There may be debates and disagreements over what actions should be considered criminal when committed by governments or states, as the legal framework for defining and prosecuting these offenses can vary across jurisdictions.
2. Sovereign Immunity: Governments and state actors often enjoy certain immunities and legal protections that can make holding them accountable for criminal acts challenging.
3. Political Sensitivity: Investigating and addressing governmental and state crimes can be politically sensitive, as it may involve challenging or questioning the legitimacy and actions of those in power.
These concepts relate to the traditional concept of white-collar crime in that they often involve non-violent offenses committed by individuals in positions of power or influence. However, governmental crime and state crime focus specifically on the actions of government entities or individuals associated with the government, whereas white-collar crime encompasses a broader range of economic and financial offenses committed by individuals in professional or business contexts.
Governmental crime has been relatively neglected by criminologists for various reasons:
1. Focus on Street Crime: Criminology traditionally has had a strong focus on street crime, such as robbery, assault, and drug offenses, while governmental crime has received less attention.
2. Political Factors: Governmental crime involves powerful actors and institutions, making it politically sensitive to investigate and study. This can create obstacles and resistance to research and analysis.
3. Data Availability: Obtaining data on governmental crime can be challenging due to issues of transparency, limited access to official records, and the covert nature of certain crimes.
Select the correct answer.
Which is an example of a chemical change?
A.
freezing water
OB.
boiling water
C.
baking a cake
OD. felling a tree
OE. breaking a glass pane
Answers
Answer:
Burning, cooking, rusting and rotting are examples of chemical changes. Therefore your answer should be C. baking a cake
Explanation:
hope this helps you! <3
Where can you find the cartridge's headstamp?
O On the side
O On the internet
O On the base
O On the top
Answers
The cartridge's head stamp can be found on the base. Thus, option C is correct.
What is the head of a cartridge?The propellant and primer are housed in the cartridge casing (including the primer cap). The 'head stamp' on most small calibre cartridges has text or symbols that may identify manufacturer, calibre, or date information. The head stamp is located on the bottom of the cartridge casing.
A bullet or shot charge is discharged through a metal tube. It might be rifled or smooth. The section of a cartridge case containing the primer, often known as the head.
Finally, before you shoot, check the ammo box and ammunition head stamp for the correct caliber of cartridge, or gauge and height of shot shell.
The marks on the bottom of a cassette built for a weapon are known as a head stamp. Therefore, it can be concluded that option C is correct.
Learn more about cartridge here:
https://brainly.com/question/13724994
#SPJ1
Describe the Court of Military Appeals:
Answers
Answer: The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces exercises worldwide appellate jurisdiction over members of the armed forces on active duty and other persons subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Explanation:
WHY should the US care about this situation? (Hint: What goal of Foreign Policy would connect?)
An earthquake hits Pakistan killing thousands of people and destroying a major city. -
Cuba, only 80 miles from the US coast obtains nuclear weapons. -
The Sudanese government is killing large numbers of its people because they are not Arab. -
A terrorist group attacks Indonesia, a democracy and longtime ally of the U.S. -
Venezuela provides large amounts of oil to the U.S., but it’s ruler is turning the democracy into an authoritative government. -
Answers
Answer:
The US should care about each of these situations for various reasons, but one goal of foreign policy that connects all of them is promoting global security and stability.
In the case of the earthquake in Pakistan, the US has a humanitarian obligation to provide aid and support to those affected. However, it is also in the interest of global security to prevent destabilization in the region, which could lead to extremist groups taking advantage of the chaos.
If Cuba were to obtain nuclear weapons, it could threaten US national security and the stability of the entire Western Hemisphere. The US has a responsibility to prevent nuclear proliferation and maintain global security.
The killing of people in Sudan based on their ethnicity is a violation of human rights and threatens the stability of the region. By promoting stability and preventing violence, the US can work towards a more secure global community.
A terrorist group attacking Indonesia not only threatens the safety and security of Indonesian citizens but also the US and its allies. By working together with Indonesia and other allies, the US can combat terrorism and promote global security.
Finally, Venezuela's shift towards an authoritarian government could have negative implications for regional stability and US interests. By supporting democracy and promoting stability, the US can work towards a safer and more secure global community.
Explanation:
Answer:
The United States should care about all of the situations mentioned as part of its foreign policy goals. The specific goal that would connect to each situation varies. Here are some examples:
An earthquake hits Pakistan killing thousands of people and destroying a major city: The United States should care about this situation because it is a humanitarian crisis. As part of its foreign policy, the U.S. may seek to provide humanitarian aid to the affected people.Cuba, only 80 miles from the US coast obtains nuclear weapons: The United States should care about this situation because it affects its national security. As part of its foreign policy, the U.S. may seek to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and deter potential aggressors.The Sudanese government is killing large numbers of its people because they are not Arab: The United States should care about this situation because it involves human rights abuses. As part of its foreign policy, the U.S. may seek to promote democracy and human rights, and pressure the Sudanese government to stop the violence.A terrorist group attacks Indonesia, a democracy and longtime ally of the U.S.: The United States should care about this situation because it affects its national security and its relationship with a key ally. As part of its foreign policy, the U.S. may seek to provide support to Indonesia in fighting terrorism and strengthening its democracy.Venezuela provides large amounts of oil to the U.S., but it’s ruler is turning the democracy into an authoritative government: The United States should care about this situation because it affects its energy security and the stability of the region. As part of its foreign policy, the U.S. may seek to support democratic forces in Venezuela and pressure the government to respect human rights and democratic norms.What informal name do you think FBI agents have given to the Terrorist Explosive Device Analytical Center?
Answers
Hope this helps!
The Terrorist Explosive Device Analytical Center (TEDAC) is the government's centralized repository for improvised explosive devices (IEDs) collected or of interest to the US government.
What is the difference between EFP and other IED?An explosively formed penetrator, or EFP, is a type of IED that is more complex than most simple IEDs. It is sometimes referred to as a "superbomb." While other IEDs typically explode in all directions, scattering shrapnel, EFPs are designed to penetrate.An Explosively Formed Penetrator (EFP) is an Iranian weapon that uses explosively formed projectiles shaped like coffee cans to penetrate armor, cause damage, and destroy targets. EFPs were first developed during WWII as a reliable means of taking action from a safe distance.To learn more about : Explosively Formed Penetrator
Ref : https://brainly.com/question/14891420
#SPJ9
6. Cocaine may cause higher sensitivity to light, causing the driver to see
Blurry
Halos around bright objects
Color lights around objects
Shadows around objects
Answers
Answer:
Cocaine may cause higher sensitivity to light, causing the driver to see
Blurry Halos around bright objects
Explanation:
what would have happened if Malala didnt
fight for education rights ?
Answers
How does alcohol have a sedative effect?
A. It speeds up a person's thinking and motor skills.
B. It enhances a person's thinking and motor skills.
C. It slows down a person's thinking and motor skills.
Answers
Answer:the answer is c
Explanation:
it slows down a persons thinking and motor skills
which policy was created by the law of april 6 1830
Answers
List the six (6) occurrences of genocide.
Answers
Answer:
This list of genocides by death toll includes estimates of all deaths which were directly or indirectly caused by genocide, as it is defined by the UN Convention. It excludes other mass killings, which are variously called mass murder, crimes against humanity, politicide, classicide, or war crimes, such as: the Thirty Years War (7.5 million deaths), Japanese war crimes (3 to 14 million deaths), the Red Terror (100,000 to 1.3 million deaths), the Atrocities in the Congo Free State (1 to 15 million deaths), the Great Purge (0.6 to 1.75 million deaths) or the Great Leap Forward and the famine which followed it (15 to 55 million deaths).
Explanation:
Here's by death.
Please answer this! Thank You!
Answers
The difference between political parties and interest groups is A. Political parties address many issues while interest groups focus on only a few issues.
How are political parties and interest groups different ?Political parties typically have a broad platform that addresses a wide range of issues, while interest groups typically focus on a specific , narrow issue or set of issues .
Political parties generally seek to win elections and form governments, while interest groups work to influence public policy by lobbying government officials, mobilizing public opinion , and engaging in other forms of advocacy .
Find out more on interest groups at https://brainly.com/question/25656843
#SPJ1