Most of the early settlements in Arabia were located
A along the coasts.
B along the rivers.
C near the lakes.
D on the southern border.

In his letter, Jefferson is saying that he does not like that there is an omission of a Bill of rights from the Constitution.

The reason why Jefferson and people with similar views, want a bill of rights added is to protect people from the excesses of government and from abuse of power.

During the Constitutional Convention, Thomas Jefferson was one of those who advocated for a Bill of Rights that would protect various rights such as:

Thomas Jefferson believed that these were necessary to protect people from a government that might end up abusing the rights of its people like the British had done. This was also the same reason people with similar views to Jefferson were fighting for a bill of rights.

Find out more on a bill of rights at https://brainly.com/question/26191838

#SPJ1

Answer:

Historians generally recognize three motives for European exploration and colonization in the New World: God, gold, and glory.

Explanation:

Answer:

1. God

3. Gold

3. Glory

Explanation:

The 3 reasons for European exploration is: God, gold and glory.

I hope it helps! Have a great day!

Pan~

This term latitude measures the distance north or south of the equator. Also known as parallels. Option A is the answer.

Latitude measures the distance from north or south of the Equator.

The lines runs in 180 and creates a circle within the equator around the east-west direcetion which is parallel to the equator.

The lines that runs within the equator are called parallels. Latitude ensures that all points are linked by sharing a parallel.

Therefore, the term latitude measures the distance north or south of the equator. Also known as parallels. Option A is the answer.

Learn more on latitude below

https://brainly.com/question/1939015

#SPJ1

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Found it in a Quizlet

Answer:

Explanation:

In the 1960s and '70s, Hispanics not only pressed for equal rights, but they also began to question the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. This 1848 agreement ended the Mexican-American War and resulted in America acquiring territory from Mexico that currently comprises the Southwestern United States.

Explanation:

Social Movements, Socio-Economic Rights and Substantial Democratisation in South Africa Kristian Stokke and Sophie Oldfield I have always said; the struggle is not over yet. I can tell you, we are free politically because black people were not supposed to take top political positions, but economically it is a struggle. … Now we think we are free and yet we are in a struggle with our own children … who are now telling us that you are going to pay or out you are. It is a bitter struggle to me and it is very difficult. I knew my enemy and it was the then [apartheid] government. … But now we are talking about our own children who were in the struggle and who is giving hell to us. (VM, Western Cape Anti-Eviction Campaign activist, 06/2002) In spite of the fact that leaders of the anti-apartheid social movements have entered into political power and defined the relations between state and civil society in collaborative terms, South Africa’s democratic transition has not put an end to adversarial popular struggles (Ballard, Habib, Ngcobo and Valodia 2003). One decade into democratic rule, the South African state faces severe challenges in including and transforming a racially and socially fractured and polarised society. In fact, post-apartheid South Africa has been marked by an increase in social inequality, particularly in the context of neo-liberal macroeconomic policies (Daniel, Habib and Southall 2003). Material deprivation, combined with increasing use of force against popular protests, have produced and radicalised a range of new social movements that politicise socio-economic rights and demand access to land, health care, housing and public services (Desai 2003). Contestation over the meaning of democratisation, and the relationship between economic liberalisation and the pursuit of social justice lie at the heart of these struggles. This chapter focuses on the politics of a post-apartheid social movement, the Western Cape Anti-Eviction Campaign. We specifically examine how community organisations with the Campaign mobilise against state-driven privatisation and cost recovery initiatives to gain access to water, electricity and housing in Cape Town. The chapter analyses the Campaign’s political strategies and capacity to fight for basic services and social justice by focusing on (a) the nature of and sources of political capacities organised through and around neighbourhood issues, (b) the ways such capacities scale up into a social movement such as the Western Cape Anti-Eviction Campaign, and (c) the implications of the mobilisation for substantial democratisation more generally in South Africa. Through this specific empirical focus, the chapter examines the clash between policies for economic liberalisation and struggles for socio-economic justice and their relationship to substantial democratisation, a democracy that should allow diverse actors both the possibility and the capacity to make use of democratic rights and institutions to promote their instrumental and democratic aims .

After the Tet offensive more and more Americans believe that the United States D. should get out of Vietnam.

For the communists, the Tet Offensive was a disastrous military catastrophe. Historians believe that up to 50,000 communist forces died in the battle for control of the country's south. South Vietnamese and American casualties were a fraction of the total.

Despite being a military defeat, the Tet Offensive was a stunning propaganda win for communists. In fact, it is frequently regarded for changing the tide of the war in their favor.

As Viet Cong rebels invaded rural areas previously held by the South Vietnamese government, the South Vietnamese began to lose authority. The offensive strained relations between South Vietnam and the United States. The Tet Offensive has ramifications for the United States.

To know more about Tet offensive:

https://brainly.com/question/1114419

#SPJ1

Answer:

Kinetic energy increases as the mass and speed of an object increase.

Explanation:

Kinetic energy increases as the mass and speed of an object increase. The equation for kinetic energy is KE = 1/2mv^2, where m is the mass of the object and v is its velocity.

If the mass of an object increases, its kinetic energy will increase by the same factor. For example, if an object has twice the mass, it will have twice the kinetic energy.

If the speed of an object increases, its kinetic energy will increase by the square of the speed increase. For example, if an object's speed doubles, its kinetic energy will quadruple.

Kinetic energy is the energy of motion. It is the energy that an object has because it is moving. Kinetic energy can be used to do work, such as when a moving car hits a wall.

Rebel without a Cause, a classic film, is associated with the 1950s in part because it reflects the popular masculinity-crisis theories of the era.

In what ways did males behave in the 1950s?

The strictest and most traditional gender roles in television can be found in the 1950s. Every morning, the men were expected to put on their suits, show up at their conventional jobs, participate in the American rat race, and then go home to be a husband and a father figure.

What is the theory behind the masculinity crisis?

In the late 1960s, historians first used the phrase "crisis of masculinity" to describe the anxiety middle-class men experienced in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries around masculinity and the male body.

When did the masculinity crisis start?

The literature, however, suggests that the modern "crisis of masculinity" first emerged in the late 1960s and early 1970s (cf Brenton 1967; Bednarik 1970; Farrell 1974; Gold- berg 1976; Gilder 1973).

Learn more about masculinity  to visit this link

https://brainly.com/question/8589718

#SPJ4

Answer: Hindu Kush is in northern Afghanistan, Elburz and Zagros are in Iran. All three of the mountain rages and they are found on the Iranian Plateau- that's the correct answer.

Explanation:

The correct answer is B. If a government violated a people's natural rights.

Explanation

John Locke was an English philosopher who based his approach on empiricism, that is, he considered that all knowledge originated from stimuli received through the senses. Other of his approaches are devoted to religion that he considers merely a relationship between the individual and God, without getting involved in social relationships between humans. Additionally, related to religion, he considers that all individuals have the right to a natural law that is responsible for establishing global harmony through a predisposition in each individual that prevents him from acting in a wrong way.

On the other hand, Locke argues that when establishing a State (social contract) individuals must preserve their four natural rights to life, liberty, private property, and the right to defend them natural rights. Therefore, it can be said that John Locke inspired the American revolutionaries because he established that individuals can preserve their right to freedom through the establishment of a new social contract if their natural rights were violated by the government.

The Age of Enlightenment, which focused on reason as the fundamental source of authority and legitimacy and highlighted the value of the scientific method, was founded on the principles of the scientific revolution.

When the Enlightenment took off in the 18th century, disciplines that had previously been seen as authentically scientific (such as alchemy and astrology) started to lose their scientific legitimacy.

In the rhetoric and philosophy of the Enlightenment, science eventually came to dominate. Many authors and intellectuals of the Enlightenment had scientific backgrounds and linked the triumph of science to the demise of religion and conventional authority in favor of the growth of free speech and ideas.

Learn more about scientific revolution here:

https://brainly.com/question/18140730

#SPJ1

Habeas corpus is a Latin phrase for "you have the body." Habeas corpus a protection for individual rights - It protects a person from being illegally imprisoned.

The correct option is C.

A person may use the legal remedy known as habeas corpus to ask a court to issue an order compelling the person's guardian, typically a prison official, to bring the prisoner into court so that the legality of the detention may be determined.

Literally, the term "habeas corpus" means "to have a body of". This writ is used to free someone who has been illegally imprisoned or held against their will. The Court instructs the person thus detained to be brought before it so that it can assess the legality of his custody as a result of this writ.

To learn more about Habeas corpus, refer

https://brainly.com/question/24231138

#SPJ1

The case established that The court's power of judicial review was established, which means the court has the power to review and determine if laws or acts of government are unconstitutional.

The case of Marbury v. Madison established the court's power of judicial review, which means that the court has the power to review and determine if laws or acts of government are constitutional or not. This power allows the court to strike down laws that it deems unconstitutional, even if they were passed by Congress and signed into law by the President.

In the specific case of Marbury v. Madison, the court used this power to strike down a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 that granted the Supreme Court the power to issue writs of mandamus to enforce the delivery of a commission. The court ruled that this provision was unconstitutional because it expanded the court's original jurisdiction beyond what was outlined in the Constitution.

Read more on Marbury v. Madisonherehttps://brainly.com/question/13309666

#SPJ1

Answer:

The court's power of judicial review was established, which means the court has the power to review and determine if laws or acts of government are unconstitutional.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a provision included in the United States Constitution during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. It stated that slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of apportioning representation and taxation among the states. This compromise was necessary to secure the agreement of southern states to the new Constitution, as they wanted slaves to be counted as full persons for the purpose of representation, but not for the purpose of taxation.

The Three-Fifths Compromise has been widely criticized for perpetuating the institution of slavery and treating enslaved persons as less than fully human. One way to improve the Constitution with regard to this issue would be to remove any provisions that treat individuals differently based on their race, ethnicity, or any other protected characteristic. This could include amendments that explicitly prohibit the use of race or ethnicity in determining representation or taxation, or that guarantee equal protection under the law for all people regardless of their race or ethnicity.

Another way to address the legacy of the Three-Fifths Compromise and other discriminatory provisions of the Constitution would be to promote greater civic education and engagement around issues of race and equality. This could involve expanding educational resources and opportunities to help people understand the history and ongoing impacts of racism, as well as providing greater support for organizations and initiatives that promote diversity, inclusion, and social justice.

Explanation: Putting soap in the fish bucket because tom and andy looked back and in a way they felt bad.

also i go to k12

Answer:

putting soap in the fish bucket

Explanation: i took the test on K12

By using a comma and a coordinating conjunction. we can fix a run-on sentence. As there are many sentences A comma, paired with a coordinating conjunction is needed.

A sentence is a verbal expression in linguistics and grammar, as in the English example "The swift brown fox jumps over the slow dog." It is often described in conventional grammar as a group of words that conveys a full notion or as a unit made up of a subject and predicate.

As there are fixing the run-on sentence we needed. putting a period in between the clauses to turn them into two sentences. if the two clauses are closely related, place a semicolon between them.

Therefore, As a result, separating the clauses with a coordinating conjunction and a comma.

Learn more about sentence here:

https://brainly.com/question/18728726

#SPJ2

Answer:

The answer is A.

(Separate the sentence into two or more sentences.)

Explanation:

I got a 100%

pls give brainliest thanks

Conversing on the phone with their neighbor while hearing his mother remark, "Fifty dollars, was the major factor that was there.

Explain in detail.

To know more about Finding Wilbur here

https://brainly.com/question/25257437

#SPJ1

Answer:

Matthew Fontaine Maury

The project is named after Matthew Fontaine Maury (1806-1873), considered by many as the father of oceanography.

Explanation:

Answer:

New moon is the answer

Explanation:

Answer:

New Moon

Explanation:

hope this helps

have a great day/night

The African National Congress used grassroots mobilization in the 1950s to fight against tightening racial restrictions.

Women were crucial in promoting the leadership of women and instigating the inclusion of women's problems in the greater democratic movement. Women of all races were together by the recently established Federation of South African Women to campaign for equality.

The federation began locally and eventually grew throughout the nation by organizing inside labor unions and from street to street. These grassroots initiatives sparked several local protests, which culminated in the women's march on the capital of Pretoria in 1956. However, despite their efforts, the government continued to apply the pass restrictions to African women.

Learn more about women civil protests in 1950 here:

https://brainly.com/question/32317423

#SPJ1

The case will be dismissed because Al has a right to hear and respond to the witnesses against him.

Many people who lived in cities fled to the countryside in the hope of greater safety because kings were frequently too weak to repel the invaders. A new social and political system known as feudalism emerged as a result of the invasions and a weak central government.

What kept things in order and protected people after the Roman Empire fell?

Small Germanic kingdoms took the place of Roman provinces during the turbulent period between 400 and 600.With the outcomes of war, the borders of those kingdoms were constantly shifting. However, the institution of the Church was able to survive the fall of the Roman Empire. The Church maintained order and security during this chaotic political period.

What shifted following Rome's fall?

Europe's political structure and culture underwent significant shifts following Rome's fall. Throughout Europe, numerous barbarian tribes established their own kingdoms. These groups typically lived independently from one another in small communities.

Learn more about feudalism here:

https://brainly.com/question/4141227

#SPJ9

The capital punishment, still part of the American justice system in most 27 states. The judge is the past, the order are the criminal is death.

What is justice system?

The term justice system refers to the judge are the passes the order of who is the victim and who is the criminal in the court. The court is to give the order in the justice to the victim.

Capital punishment is the most of the states in the America. According to the justice of the American system are the passes, the order of the criminal is death. Mostly in the crime of murder. America is the mostly in the 27 states.

As a result, capital punishment, still part of the American justice system in most 27 states.

Learn more about on justice system, here:

https://brainly.com/question/28784358

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Supreme Court’s ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland

directly influenced the Gibbons v. Ogden case.

Explanation:

The case of McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) enabled the Supreme Court to establish that Congress had implied powers under the "Necessary and Proper Clause" of Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution to create the Second Bank of the United States.  This ruling barred the state of Maryland from taxing the Bank, an establishment of the federal government.

In a unanimous judgement presided over by Justice Marshall, the court ruled that the Federal Government had the right and power to set up a Federal bank and that states did not have the power to tax the Federal Government or its establishment, concluding that “the power to tax involves the power to destroy."

The Facts of the case:

The branch of the federal government bank's in Baltimore, Maryland  refused to pay the tax imposed by the state of Maryland.  Maryland sued James McCulloch, who was the cashier of the branch, to enforce collection of the tax debt.  In his response, McCulloch noted that the tax was unconstitutional.  A Maryland State court ruled in favor of Maryland and the court of appeals affirmed the ruling, before it was taken to the Supreme Court, which reversed the ruling in McCulloch's favor.

The next case that benefit from the above Supreme Court judgement was the case of Gibbons v. Ogden.  In Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1 (1824), another landmark decision was made by the Supreme Court of the United States in which it held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.  This opened the way for the federal government to regulate interstate trade.

Facts of Gibbons v. Ogden

A New York state law gave Robert R. Livingston and Robert Fulton a 20-year monopoly over navigation on waters within state jurisdiction. Aaron Ogden and other competitors tried to forestall the monopoly without success.  Thomas Gibbons, a steamboat owner who did business between New York and New Jersey under a federal coastal license – formed a partnership with Ogden, which fell apart after three years when Gibbons operated another steamboat on a New York route belonging to Ogden. Ogden filed suit against Gibbons in New York state court, and received a permanent injunction.  The New York state court rejected Gibbons’ argument asserting that U.S. Congress controlled interstate commerce.

In their review and conclusion, Justice Marshall with other Justices, stated that only Congress had the power to regulate navigation by steamboat operators and others who were conducting interstate commerce in accordance with the Commerce Clause.  The law by New York state was therefore declared invalid.

Answer: D- Gibbons v. Ogden

Explanation:

Gibbons v. Ogden

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

It played a key role in helping turn the tide on the Eastern Front in favour of Soviet Russia. By the later years of the war, the German advantage had lessened. Whilst German forces benefitted from the huge armaments of tanks like the Tiger, the industrial might of the Allies meant they had tanks in larger quantities.