Answers
Answer:
Financed the truck.
Explanation:
A loan is money given with the understanding that it will be paid back. A finance is giving its requirements for managing wealth and investing money.
Hope that helps
Related Questions
What essential conditions are necessary for a combustion reaction (fire triangle)?
please write a full sentence or report you.
Answers
The three essential conditions necessary for a combustion reaction, or the fire triangle, are heat, fuel, and oxygen.
What is Combustions?
Combustion, also known as burning, is a chemical reaction in which a substance reacts quickly with oxygen to release heat and light. This process is often accompanied by a flame and is an important part of many natural and human-made processes, including combustion engines, cooking, and wildfires.
The fire triangle is a model used to explain the three essential conditions that are required for a fire to start and continue burning: fuel, heat, and oxygen. In other words, in order for a combustion reaction to occur, there must be a fuel source (such as wood, gasoline, or paper).
Learn more about Combustions from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/24113573
#SPJ1
suppose a judge sitting on a district court in texas is found to have been accepting monetary bribes from lawyers to rule in their favor on several cases. according to the texas constitution, what is the most likely action to be taken regarding this judge?
Answers
When a district court judge in Texas is discovered to have taken bribes from attorneys to decide in their favor on a number of cases, the Supreme Court of Texas will probably take steps to remove the judge from office.
The Judicial Conduct Commission has the authority to remove a judge from office for incompetence in the performance of the duties of the office, willful violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct, or persistent violation of rules promulgated by the Supreme Court of Texas.
In other words, judges are free to hold office for however long they see fit, and the only way to remove them from through impeachment.
A quorum must consist of seven persons. With the exception of recommendations for a judge's retirement, suspension, or removal, which must be granted by a vote of at least seven members, decisions must be made by most of those present.
To know more about Texas Supreme Court: https://brainly.com/question/14673579
#SPJ4
Assume that the federal law and the NYC law do not conflict. How would you challenge the validity of the NYC Soda Ban in a different way? Select an option from the choices below and click Submit. a. You could argue that the NYC Health Department does not have the authority to pass such a soda ban. b. You could argue that the law is unfair to movie theatres. c. You could argue that New Jersey has a conflicting law, which is supreme over the New York Law.
Answers
A is the correct answer.
If the federal law and the NYC law do not conflict, one can challenge the validity of the NYC Soda Ban by arguing that the NYC Health Department does not have the authority to pass such a soda ban.
The New York City soda ban aimed to restrict the sale of large-sized sugary drinks in restaurants, food courts, and movie theaters. However, a federal court found that the city's Board of Health had overstepped its authority in passing the ban because the New York City Council had not approved the law. As a result, one can challenge the validity of the NYC Soda Ban by arguing that the NYC Health Department does not have the authority to pass such a soda ban.
To know more about NYC Health Department visit:
brainly.com/question/49579850
#SPJ11
which of the following affords stability and predictability to the law? res ipsa loquitur stare decisis clemency certiorari
Answers
Res ipsa loquitur, stare decisis, and certiorari all afford stability and predictability to the law. Res ipsa loquitur is a Latin term meaning “the thing speaks for itself” and it is a rule of evidence used in civil suits. The rule allows for an inference of negligence on the part of the defendant.
Stare decisis is a legal principle in which a court should follow its previous decisions when the same legal issues arise. Certiorari is a type of writ (order) used by a higher court to review the decision of a lower court. Stare decisis affords stability and predictability to the law.
The concept of stare decisis means to stand by things decided. It is the principle of determining points of law according to precedent. The term is applied in the sense that courts should follow the principles they had established earlier in making judgments.
It provides that a court should follow the rules and principles made by it in a previous decision that has similar facts and issues. This will provide stability and predictability to the law. It ensures the continuity of the law and helps in maintaining stability and consistency in its application.
Other options: Res ipsa loquitur: This is a legal doctrine that allows the court to presume negligence without the plaintiff providing direct evidence of negligence. This does not afford stability and predictability to the law. Clemency is the act of mercy or leniency shown by the authorities to a person who has committed a crime.
This is not a legal doctrine and does not afford stability and predictability to the law. Certiorari is a writ or order from a higher court to a lower court or tribunal directing it to send up the record of a particular case for review. It does not afford stability and predictability to the law.
To know more about Res ipsa loquitur, stare decisis, and certiorari, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/12177870#
#SPJ11
Can you take your common law marriage to other states?
Answers
Answer:
no
you're not in common law marriage after 7 years together but it's under that duration you can
which amendment prohibits excessive bail
Answers
protected classes in federal antidiscrimination law is called
Answers
Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, protected classes are specified in relation to federal anti-discrimination law.
Discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, or handicap is illegal under federal law. Since 1866, it has been unlawful to discriminate on the basis of race or color. Actions that are likely to offend, insult, demean or intimidate another person are prohibited by the Racial Discrimination Act.
Equal protection under the law is provided under the United States 14th amendment. No citizen's personal liberties or rights may be violated only because they do not identify with the dominant race, religion, ethnicity, or gender, according to this.
To learn more about Antidiscrimination law
https://brainly.com/question/29974451
#SPJ4
How long is the prison time for someone who commits copyright infringement for the first time?.
Answers
If you commit copyright infringement for the first time, you will face a 5-year prison sentence. Five years prison time!
If you continue to commit copyright infringement after being caught, you will face a 15-year prison sentence. A repeat copyright violator faces a sentence of fifteen years in prison. To repeatedly violate someone else's copyright, you must be genuinely committed to staying in jail.
When any work is legally protected by copyright and is used without permission for which such consent is necessary, it is violating certain exclusive rights provided to the copyright holder and is commonly referred to as copyright infringement, which was formerly known as just piracy.
To avoid copyright infringement, look for material with Fair Use Copyright. The fair use doctrine allows for any copying of intellectual property that is done for a particular and beneficial purpose. To keep yourself out of bars, try to steer clear of piracy.
Learn how the offender will pay for infringing on copyright materials: https://brainly.com/question/16774161
#SPJ4
in order for the supreme court to hear oral arguments or decide a case on the written record
Answers
In order for the Supreme Court to hear oral arguments or decide a case based on the written record, the case must go through a process known as "granting certiorari," where the Court agrees to review the case.
The Supreme Court receives numerous requests for review each year, but it has limited capacity to hear oral arguments and decide cases. To determine which cases to review, the Court uses a process called "granting certiorari" or "granting cert." This process involves a thorough evaluation of the legal issues and considerations involved in the case.
Typically, a party seeking review by the Supreme Court files a petition for a writ of certiorari, which outlines the reasons why the Court should hear the case. The Court's law clerks and justices review the petition, the responses from the opposing parties, and the relevant lower court decisions.
They assess the legal significance of the case, its potential impact, and any conflicts among lower courts on the issue.If at least four justices agree to hear the case, the Court grants certiorari, and the case proceeds to the next stage
To learn more about Supreme Court click here :
brainly.com/question/29759733
#SPJ11
Which of the following would NOT be considered a civic responsibility?
A.
voting
B.
serving on a committee
C.
obeying the law
D.
volunteering
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Answers
Answer:
C. Obeying the law
Explanation:
A civic responsibility is something you should do to be a good citizen, meaning you should do them but you don't have to. Obeying the law on a other hand, is something you HAVE to do or you get punished. Hope this helps!
most cases involving questions of federal law originate in: group of answer choices the state municipal courts the u.s. district courts the u.s. claims court the u.s. superior courts the state district courts
Answers
The correct option is B, Most cases involving questions of federal law originate in the U.S. District Courts.
Federal law refers to the body of legal principles and regulations established by the central government of a country, particularly in the context of a federal system. It encompasses statutes, regulations, and court decisions that apply uniformly across the entire nation, governing a wide range of matters within the federal government's authority.
In the United States, federal law consists of legislation enacted by the U.S. Congress, including the Constitution, federal statutes, and regulations issued by federal agencies. It covers areas such as civil rights, taxation, immigration, commerce, criminal offenses, and national security. Federal law supersedes state laws when there is a conflict, ensuring consistency and uniformity in key areas.
To know more about Federal law refer to-
brainly.com/question/14867447
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
most cases involving questions of federal law originate in a group of answer choices
A). The state municipal courts
B). the u.s. District courts
C). the u.s. claims court
D). the u.s. superior courts
E). The state district courts
mention and clearly explain four essential ingredients for the existence of a contract
Answers
Answer:
For a contract to be legally binding it must contain four essential elements:
an offer
an acceptance
an intention to create a legal relationship
a consideration (usually money).
However it may still be considered invalid if it:
entices someone to commit a crime, or is illegal
is entered into by someone that lacks capacity, such as a minor or bankrupt
was agreed through misleading or deceptive conduct, duress, unconscionable conduct or undue influence.
Compare and contrast classical approaches of explaining crime to positivist approaches of explaining crime
Answers
Drug Users will have ____ psychological changes
A. Mild
B. Significant
C.no
Answers
Answer:
significant
Explanation:
Answer:
Drug users will have Significant psychological changes
Explanation:
The reason for this is that certain drugs can harm the brain devouring important elements of control
29 CFR 1910 requires that fire fighters involved in interior structural firefighting operations be provided with a(n):
Answers
29 CFR 1910 requires that firefighters involved in interior structural firefighting operations be provided with a self-contained breathing apparatus
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA, is one of the Department of Labor's agencies. OSHA's regulation 29 CFR 1910 establishes requirements for workplace security. In the given case, is it specifically discussed about the Respiratory Protection Standard which is the 29 CFR 1910.134
In accordance with this standard, a self-contained breathing apparatus must be available for use by firefighters engaged in inside-structure firefighting operations (SCBA). The SCBA provides a breathable air supply in environments where the air may be polluted or low in oxygen. The standard also stipulates that firefighters must receive training in the usage and maintenance of SCBAs and that they must be adequately maintained and inspected.
Read more about CFR 1910 on:
https://brainly.com/question/1264446
#SPJ4
a courts decision establishes what type of law?
Answers
Answer:
The law that has been evolved from the decisions made in appellate courts and judicial precedent, is known as common law or sometimes as case law. The common law system gives pre-eminence to the common law, as it considers unfair to treat the same facts in a different manner in different situations.
HELPPPP pleaseeeeeee
Answers
I'm a little bit confused between a and b..
but I found this maybe it will help u..
Explanation:
The Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self- defense within the home.
The District of Columbia argued that the opening phrase of the amendment, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,” known as the prefatory clause, limited the “right of the people” to have weapons only in connection with militia service. The city also pointed out that the law did not ban all guns, and that it was a reasonable way to prevent crime.
The Court agreed with Heller and overturned the District’s law. The Court reasoned that the prefatory clause gave one reason for the Second Amendment, but it did not limit the right listed in the operative clause—the second part of the amendment—to own weapons only for militia service. “The prefatory clause does not suggest that preserving the militia was the only reason Americans valued the ancient right…” The Court also reasoned that elsewhere in the Constitution, such as the First, Fourth, and Ninth Amendments, the phrase “the right of the people” is used only to refer to individual rights—that is, rights held by people as individuals. It is this phrasing that is used in the operative clause of the Second Amendment.
Finally, the Court reasoned that the right to own weapons for self-defense was an “inherent” (in-born) right of all people. “It has always been widely understood that the Second Amendment, like the First and Fourth Amendments, codified a pre-existing right. The very text of the Second Amendment implicitly recognizes the pre-existence of the right and declares only that it ‘shall not be infringed.’”
Therefore, the answer is A.
What source of Arizona real estate law consists of codified regulations that carry the force of the law without being laws themselves
Answers
Arizona Administrative Code is the source of Arizona real estate law consists of codified regulations that carry the force of the law without being laws themselves.
Arizona real estate law is a compendium consisting of Arizona state constitution, Arizona revised statutes and Arizona administrative code. It is published for the convenience of real estate licenses and public.
Arizona Administrative Code is the official publication of Arizona's codified rules published by Administrative Rules Division.
The state agencies, boards and commissions, are given rule making authority by the state legislature in Arizona Administrative. It consists of regulations that carry the force of laws without being laws themselves.
To learn more about Arizona real estate law here
https://brainly.com/question/4116996
#SPJ4
the obligation to perform acts already required is known as a:
Answers
According to the question the obligation to perform acts already required is known as a duty.
An obligation refers to a moral or legal duty that an individual or entity is bound to fulfill. It is a responsibility or commitment that one is obliged to meet, often stemming from social norms, laws, contracts, or personal agreements.
In a legal context, obligations are enforceable and carry legal consequences if not fulfilled. They arise from contractual agreements, statutory requirements, or judicial rulings. For example, when individuals enter into a lease agreement, they have an obligation to pay rent and maintain the property as specified in the contract.
To learn more about obligation
https://brainly.com/question/32069276
#SPJ11
Give atleast 5 example of ethics and morals?
Answers
Do not destroy property.
Have courage.
Keep your promises.
Do not cheat.
Treat others as you want to be treated.
Do not judge.
Be dependable.
Define sexual behavior
Answers
Answer:
That is the definition.
Hope it helped.
during pretrial evidence suppression hearings, the burden of proof lies with the
Answers
The burden of proof during pretrial evidence suppression hearings lies with the prosecution.
Who has the burden of proof during pretrial evidence suppression hearings?During pretrial evidence suppression hearings, it is the prosecution's responsibility to establish that the evidence in question should be admissible in court. The burden of proof rests with the prosecution to demonstrate that the evidence was obtained lawfully and in accordance with constitutional rights. The defense may argue for the exclusion of evidence by challenging its legality or arguing violations of Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. Ultimately, the court decides whether the evidence should be suppressed based on the arguments and evidence presented by both the prosecution and defense.
Learn more about suppression hearings
brainly.com/question/32331686
#SPJ11
The difference between general intent and specific intent is:
general intent requires only a desire to act; specific intent requires the desire for a specific result
Only specific intent needs to be proven
There is no difference
One results in a felony, the other in a misdemeanor
Answers
The difference between general intent and specific intent is that general intent requires only a desire to act, whereas specific intent requires the desire for a specific result.
General intent requires only a desire to act; specific intent requires the desire for a specific result.
General intent implies that a person possesses an intention to engage in a behavior even if they do not know that the behavior is illegal.
For example, if someone hits someone else with a baseball bat, the behavior constitutes a general intent crime because it is not necessary to prove that the perpetrator intended to break the law
Learn more about general intent at:
https://brainly.com/question/32177316
#SPJ11
Being which of the following means being responsible for an action or person?
Guilty
Reliable
Liable
Answers
In a successful civil RICO action, what civil remedies are available to the prevailing party?
Answers
allow the recovery of treble damages (damages in triple the amount of actual/compensatory damages).
wikipedia
Plsssssss help ill give extra points and brainlest answer
Answers
Answer: A rule established by your parents
Explanation: there is no explanation
when determining how large of a countercyclical fiscal stimulus to apply, policymakers must keep in mind that aggregate demand (ad) will _______ increase in government spending.
Answers
We can see here that when determining how large of a countercyclical fiscal stimulus to apply, policymakers must keep in mind that aggregate demand (AD) will increase in response to an increase in government spending.
Who is a policymaker?A policymaker is someone who creates or implements policies. Policymakers can be found in all levels of government, as well as in businesses, non-profit organizations, and other institutions. They work in a variety of fields, including economics, social policy, environmental policy, and foreign policy.
Policymakers are responsible for making decisions that affect the lives of many people. They must consider a wide range of factors, including the needs of their constituents, the availability of resources, and the potential consequences of their decisions.
Learn more about policymaker on https://brainly.com/question/30108217
#SPJ4
Answer: When determining how large of a countercyclical fiscal stimulus to apply, policymakers must keep in mind that aggregate demand (AD) will not necessarily increase in government spending.
A countercyclical fiscal stimulus involves increasing government spending and/or decreasing taxes during economic downturns in order to boost aggregate demand, stimulate economic activity, and prevent or mitigate the effects of a recession. However, the effectiveness of such a policy depends on a number of factors, including the size and duration of the stimulus, the degree of spare capacity in the economy, and the responsiveness of households and firms to changes in government policy.
In some cases, an increase in government spending may lead to only a modest increase in aggregate demand, particularly if households and firms are highly indebted, facing uncertainty about the future, or have already reduced their spending in response to the recession.
In addition, if the stimulus is seen as temporary or ineffective, it may fail to raise confidence and expectations about the future, which are important determinants of aggregate demand and economic growth. Therefore, policymakers must carefully assess the potential impact of a countercyclical fiscal stimulus and ensure that it is appropriately targeted and designed to achieve its intended goals.
They may also need to consider other policy measures, such as monetary policy or structural reforms, to support the effectiveness of the stimulus and facilitate the recovery of the economy.
To know more about the countercyclical fiscal stimulus, click here;
https://brainly.com/question/31873730
#SPJ11
A and B own Blackacre as tenants in common. Each agrees in writing never to seek partition. A sues for partition. What result?
Answers
A's lawsuit for partition will likely be unsuccessful. This is because both A and B had agreed in writing never to seek partition, which means that they had made a legally binding agreement not to divide or sell the property.
Tenants in common own equal shares of a property and have the right to possession and use of the entire property. However, each tenant in common also has the right to seek partition, which means to divide or sell the property. In this case, both A and B had agreed in writing never to seek partition, which would prevent either of them from dividing or selling the property without the other's consent.
By suing for partition, A is essentially violating the agreement that was made with B. As a result, A's lawsuit for partition may not be successful, and the court may order A to abide by the previous agreement not to seek partition.
Learn more about the right to possession: https://brainly.com/question/30238136
#SPJ11
What are the basic classes of weapons?
Answers
The basic classes of weapons include firearms, melee weapons, and explosives. Firearms use projectiles propelled by gunpowder.
Guns are weapons that shoot projectiles like bullets or pellets at a target at high speeds using an explosive charge.There are numerous different sorts of weapons, each with unique benefits and drawbacks, such as pistols, rifles, shotguns, and machine guns.Swords, knives, axes, clubs, and other close-quarters combat weapons are examples of melee weapons.A melee weapon's potency is influenced by its properties, such as weight, balance, and durability, as well as the skill of the user.Explosives are weapons that produce a tremendous blast through chemical reactions that can be used to damage objects or kill targets.High explosives, which detonate with supersonic shock waves, and low explosives, which detonate with less powerful shock waves.Guns are weapons that shoot projectiles like bullets or pellets at a target at high speeds using an explosive charge.
learn more about weapons here:
https://brainly.com/question/10275462
#SPJ1
Drag each tile to the correct box.
Place the steps of the presidential election process in the correct order.
Voters participate in the general election.
National party conventions are held.
Voters participate in primaries or
caucuses.
The candidate with the majority of the
votes wins the presidency
The Electoral College votes.
Candidates announce they are running for
their party's nomination?
Answers
National party conventions are held.
Candidates announce they are running for their party's nomination
Voters participate in primaries or caucuses.
Voters participate in the general election.
The Electoral College votes.
The candidate with the majority of the votes wins the presidency.
What is the meaning of the Electoral College?An example of a system where an executive president is indirectly elected is the United States Electoral College, which has electors from each of the 50 states plus the District of Columbia. The electors, who formally select the president through the electoral college, are determined by the public's votes.
Although the phrase "Electoral College" does not appear in the U.S. Constitution, it is how we refer to the procedure by which the United States elects the President. The Vice-President and the President are chosen by the States, which also include the District of Columbia for this procedure.
Learn more about the Electoral College here:
https://brainly.com/question/25375266
#SPJ1