Mike is being sentenced for driving under the influence of alcohol. in his state, crime is considered a traffic violation. in this case, the judges preference in sentencing is primarily to help Mike transform into a more law abiding citizen. which goal of the criminal justice system is guiding the judges reasoning in Mike's case?

deterrence
incapacitation
rehabilitation
dude process

​

Answer:

biology, blood.

Explanation:

ballistics deals with 2A, so not that one. and crime scene photography does not analyze evidence filmed. but bio does to test for who's dna etc. you can use hair teeth and blood to identify a victim or suspect but with the given example of bodily fluids blood is the best answer. hope this helps.

Answer:

d

Explanation:

The W-2 box for wages income and taxes withheld is d. wages and income = box 1, taxes withheld = box 2.

W-2 boxes is the box that contain information about income or wages and tax in W-2 form. There are 14 box with different information.

Since the option only provide box 1 to box 3, so we only need to know the information in these three texts, which is:

Thus, the wages and income can be find in box 1 and the taxes withheld can be find in box 2. So, the correct option is d.

Learn more about W-2 here:

brainly.com/question/25396013

#SPJ4

A person or business doing business in California satisfies the minimum contacts requirement for being sued here is a false statement.

A business can be defined as an organization that carries out transactions like sending a commodity or rendering service and for that they are being paid some money.

A defendant who has few encounters with both the state is one who does not violate the principles of substantial fairness as well as fair play.

The minimum connections test is a careful balance that aims to strike a balance between the reasonableness of requiring a criminal to go to the territory of a country to argue against one complaint there and the sum of the accused's connections only with the host state.

Learn more about business , here:

https://brainly.com/question/15826604

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

hope this helps! ＼(⌒▽⌒)

can i have brainliest???

Constitution of United States of America 1789

Explanation:

You posted a photo of the 1st amendment, but didn't ask what you were looking for so I am just assuming this is what you need

if a defendant is denied their right to appeal based on the fact that they have already served the time of their sentence, this decision falls under the Double jeopardy.

Double jeopardy is a legal principle that protects individuals from being tried or punished twice for the same offense. According to the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, no person shall “be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.”

This means that if a defendant has already served the time of their sentence, they cannot be tried again or punished further for the same offense. This protection applies even if the defendant is later found to be innocent of the crime they were originally convicted of. In essence, double jeopardy prevents the government from punishing a person more than once for the same offense. It is a fundamental right that all individuals are entitled to, regardless of the severity of the crime.

Know more about Double jeopardy here

https://brainly.com/question/26602409#

#SPJ11

The Liquor manages Act prohibits an alcoholic liquor permittee or their employees from supplying alcohol to intoxicated individuals (CGS § 30-86(b)(1)). Violations are punishable by using as much as $1,000  up to at least one-12 months imprisonment, or, for every offense (CGS § 30-113).

Some commonplace signs and symptoms of intoxication are Loud speech, boasting, crude conduct, consuming on my own, ingesting too fast, slurred speech, ordering doubles, looking for rounds, and stumbling.

Single indicator as a way to particularly become aware of seen intoxication.

1)frequency of drinking.

2)Speech.

3)Incoherent, rambling, and slurring.

4)conduct.

5)impolite, offensive, overly pleasant, annoying, confused, aggressive, violent, and inappropriate.

6)stability.

7)Unsteady on toes, dazzling and swaying.

8)Coordination.

Learn more about the intoxicated person here: https://brainly.com/question/28019347

#SPJ1

The Supreme Court ruled that the "individual mandate" of the ACA could not be justified as constitutional under the Commerce Clause because it compels individuals to engage in commerce by purchasing health insurance, rather than regulating existing commercial activity.

The Commerce Clause grants Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states, but the Court determined that this power does not extend to forcing people to participate in commerce.

The Court reasoned that if Congress could mandate the purchase of health insurance under the Commerce Clause, it could potentially mandate the purchase of other goods and services, which would significantly expand the scope of federal power.

Instead, the Court upheld the individual mandate as a constitutional exercise of Congress's taxing power, since the penalty for not having health insurance could be considered a tax.

In summary, the Supreme Court ruled that the individual mandate could not be justified under the Commerce Clause because it would require people to engage in commerce, rather than regulating existing commerce, and thus could lead to an excessive expansion of federal power. However, the mandate was ultimately upheld based on Congress's power to tax.

To know more about Supreme Court refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29759733#

#SPJ11

Any disputes arising out of this contract of employment are subject to arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association. Was an arbitration clause.

In most cases, employment refers to the status of having a paid job—of being employed. Employing someone is paying them to work. Employees are employed by an employer. Employment can also refer to the act of hiring individuals, as in We're trying to hire more women.

The term employment contract may include an employment arbitration clause, which means you agreed not to pursue any legal action against your employer in court. Instead, any disputes that you have with your employer must be settled through a process known as arbitration

Therefore, Thus option (A) is correct.

Learn more about employment here:

https://brainly.com/question/1361941

#SPJ1

Answer:

It is questionable whether or not retrial after a hung jury is Constitutional. ... If a mistrial occurs due to a hung jury, the prosecutor may decide to retry the case. A judge may decide to disallow this in some cases, but the prosecutor is usually allowed to proceed.

Answer:

Explanation:

B. Because it not always runner under the best circumstances

Answer:

The answer is a.

People help each other.

I hope this is helpful!

No, because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable.

The presence of an easement that was not addressed in the contract renders the title unmarketable, as stated in option C. As a result, the seller will not likely prevail in a suit for specific performance.

Specific performance is a legal concept where a court orders one party to perform a specific act. It is frequently employed in contract law cases. The goal of specific performance is to make the contract come to life. Specific performance is a legally binding contract remedy that allows a party to force the other party to perform their contractual obligations. According to the case mentioned, in a suit for specific performance, the seller is unlikely to prevail because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable. The buyer found out that there was an easement for the public sidewalk that ran in front of the store. Although it enhanced the value of the property, the buyer did not tell the seller about it.

The seller could hold the buyer to the contract, but the buyer refused to tender the purchase price because the title is unmarketable, citing the sidewalk easement as proof. Furthermore, the contract did not specify the quality of the title to be conveyed, nor did it mention easements or reservations.

Read more about valid binding contract in terms of performance here:

https://brainly.com/question/32959753

#SPJ11

Answer: First case is a civil case.

Second case is criminal case.

Explanation:

First case is a civil case because it is caused due to the negligence of the gym management who did not conduct a check on instruments used in the gym. Also, if a particular person is not involved in criminal conduct then the case will be considered as civil case resulting in the injury of the students.

Second case as the car was under the supervision of the auto repair shop so the car should not receive damage during tire repair. This is showing the negligence of the auto repair shop and if a person is involved in dishonestly damaging the car should be penalized.

The statement "Regarding Heman Sweatt vs Painter, the US Supreme Court ruled that the University of Texas at Austin did act legally in its attempt to create a small separate basement law school facility to instruct him only as a black student." is false as University of Texas at Austin's attempt to create a separate law school facility for black students.

The US Supreme Court determined in Heman Sweatt v. Painter that the University of Texas at Austin's efforts to establish a separate law school facility for black students were not equal to the opportunities offered at the main law school and, as a result violated the "separate but equal" principle.

In the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education, which ruled segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional, the court determined that the separate facility did not adhere to the standards established by that precedent. Racially segregated educational institutions in the US were eventually abolished thanks to the Sweatt case decision.

Learn more about Heman Sweatt vs Painter at:

brainly.com/question/12304411

#SPJ4

Virginia Exemptions and IRS 20 Factors for Employee Classification

Decision 87-41 on Revenue: The Twenty Factors

The IRS identified 20 characteristics which may reflect whether the employer may exert sufficient control to form an employer-employee relationship in order to assist in determining whether a worker is an employee under the common law rules.

These criteria, outlined in Revenue Ruling 87-41, were developed based on the specific facts that the courts recognized and considered when determining the existence of an employment relationship.

Although not all of the elements must be present to establish an employment relationship, they can be used as a general framework to determine if a person is most likely either an employee or an independent contractor.

To know more about employee, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1190099

#SPJ4

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Gary did that to makes sure no one messes with the evidece.

Hope it helps

The characteristic that was recently established as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is sexual orientation.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a comprehensive law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin in several areas such as employment, education, housing, and public accommodations. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964. Sexual orientation was not included in the original version of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but in June 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex. This was a landmark decision for the LGBTQ+ community and a significant expansion of civil rights protections in the United States.

Learn more about President Lyndon B. Johnson:

https://brainly.com/question/1172086

#SPJ11

Answer: Positivism- it's a philosophy of every justifiable assertion can be backed up by science and mathematical proof.

Rational theory- Refers to the theory of why humans behave as they might what causes certain behaviours.

Explanation:

Section 7 of the Clayton Act forbids mergers and acquisitions that "may significantly reduce competition or likely to create a monopoly." The Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act of 1936, also prohibits some discriminatory rates, services, and concessions in merchant transactions.

Thus this is what Clayton antitrust act of 1914 and the Robinson Patman act of 1936 outlaw.

Refer here to learn more about Clayton antitrust act: https://brainly.com/question/8709214

#SPJ4

Answer:

Section 15 of the Child Court Act, which provides that judges of the Child Court are to be appointed by the Minister for Justice, may be unconstitutional if it violates the separation of powers doctrine. The doctrine requires that the three branches of government, namely the executive, legislative, and judicial, be independent of each other.

In the case of Lobe & Anor v Speaker of the National Assembly and Anor (2016), the Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe held that the appointment of judges by the President, without the involvement of the Judicial Service Commission, was unconstitutional because it violated the separation of powers doctrine.

Similarly, in the case of Law Society of Zimbabwe v Minister of Justice, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs (2015), the Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe held that the appointment of the Prosecutor-General by the President, without the involvement of the Judicial Service Commission, was unconstitutional because it violated the separation of powers doctrine.

Based on these cases, it can be argued that Section 15 of the Child Court Act, which provides for the appointment of judges of the Child Court by the Minister for Justice, violates the separation of powers doctrine and is therefore unconstitutional. Jane may challenge her conviction on this basis.

Explanation:

A government that is strong enough to promote virtue in its citizens, according to James Madison, a key architect of the Constitution, is too powerful.

Because of his crucial contribution to the drafting and ratification of the Constitution, James Madison is referred to as its "Father." In the context of constitutional governance, any interventions and restrictions by the government have indeed been based on three assumptions, according to James M. Buchanan, one of the pioneers of constitutional economics and winner of the Nobel Memorial Prize for Economic Sciences in 1986. The division of powers refers to this process of allocating authority among the several branches of government. From then, the Framers created the federalist system, which further split authority between the federal government and the states.

Learn more about government

https://brainly.com/question/13540610

#SPJ4

Answer:

True

The conduct of a practitioner may indeed be sanctionable if the practitioner intentionally misleads a client so as to defraud that client. This is based on the ethical and professional standards that govern various professions, particularly those in the legal, medical, and financial sectors.

To understand this in detail, let's break it down into smaller logical steps:

1. Professional Conduct: Practitioners across various fields are bound by certain rules of professional conduct. These rules are designed to ensure that practitioners act in a manner that is ethical, honest, and in the best interests of their clients. They cover a wide range of behaviors, including honesty in communications, confidentiality, conflict of interest, and more.

2. Intentional Misleading: Intentionally misleading a client involves knowingly providing false or inaccurate information with the aim of deceiving the client. This could take many forms, such as lying about qualifications, providing incorrect advice, or withholding important information.

3. Defrauding a Client: Defrauding a client involves using deceit or dishonesty to gain an unfair or dishonest advantage, often financial. This could involve overcharging for services, billing for services not provided, or manipulating a client's decisions for personal gain.

4. Sanctions: If a practitioner is found to have intentionally misled a client so as to defraud them, they can face sanctions from their professional body. These sanctions can range from fines and reprimands to suspension or revocation of their license to practice.

5. Evidence and Investigation: Allegations of such misconduct would typically be investigated by the relevant professional body or regulatory authority. The investigation would seek to gather evidence to determine whether the practitioner did indeed intentionally mislead the client and defraud them.

6. Legal Implications: In addition to professional sanctions, practitioners who defraud their clients could also face legal consequences. This could include criminal charges for fraud or civil lawsuits for damages.

Therefore, it is true that the conduct of a practitioner may be sanctionable if they intentionally mislead a client so as to defraud that client.

The probability that this answer is correct is very high given that it is based on widely accepted principles of professional ethics and conduct.

The statements that are true are option A, B and D:

a. EMT levels of certification are standardized at a national level.

b. The paramedic has studied and is able to deliver advanced life support in emergency situations.

d. EMT-B and paramedics are trained and can respond to 911 emergencies.

While paramedics can use their additional training to provide medical aid in a variety of more specific situations, EMTs typically respond to 911 calls in an ambulance. For instance, they might function as a paramedic-firefighter for a fire department.

To determine whether the patient is experiencing cardiac arrest and to begin resuscitation, EMTs and paramedics may evaluate the scene. Additionally, they send the patient to the most suitable facility for final care, which is typically the hospital that is closest and has the greatest facilities for treating cardiac arrest patients.

Note that all Candidates need to: Be at least 18 years old. The written consent of a parent or legal guardian is required for 16- and 17-year-old applicants for Emergency Medical Responder and EMT positions.

Learn more about EMT certification from

https://brainly.com/question/28046895

#SPJ1