Mentally ill prisoners pose many challenges for correctional professionals. They are more likely than other inmates to be involved in fights, gang activity, and other disruptive behaviour.
This is due to their lack of insight into their own condition, their inability to understand the consequences of their actions, and their tendency to become easily frustrated or overwhelmed in a prison environment. Mentally ill prisoners often require specialised programming or interventions to help them cope with their condition and to help them learn how to better manage their behaviour.
Correctional professionals must also ensure that mentally ill prisoners receive appropriate mental health care, including access to psychiatrists, psychologists, and other mental health professionals. Finally, correctional professionals must also be mindful of the need for mentally ill prisoners to receive education and other meaningful activities in order to reduce the risk of recidivism.
All of these challenges require correctional professionals to have a strong understanding of mental health issues and how to best respond to them.
Know more about Professionals here
https://brainly.com/question/3396195#
#SPJ11
The state tax incentive is an example of":
Answer:
mortgage interest deduction
a previous court decision that influences and is the basis for deciding later, similar cases is called question 23 options: a precedent. criminal law. a judicial maxim. common law. statutory law.
A previous court decision that influences and is the basis for deciding later, similar cases is known as a precedent.
Precedent is a fundamental principle in the common law system, which relies heavily on the use of prior court decisions as guidance in resolving current cases. Precedent can be binding or persuasive, depending on the hierarchy of courts and the facts of the case. Binding precedent must be followed by lower courts in the same jurisdiction, while persuasive precedent is not binding but may be considered by the court.
The use of precedent helps to promote consistency and predictability in the law, as it provides a framework for judges to make decisions based on similar cases that have already been decided. It also ensures that the law evolves gradually and is not subject to abrupt changes.
In contrast to statutory law, which is created by legislatures, precedent is created by judges through their interpretations of the law. This is why the common law system is often described as a judge-made law system.
Overall, precedent is a critical component of the common law system and plays a crucial role in shaping the development of the law.
Learn more about statutory here:
https://brainly.com/question/28620883
#SPJ11
Select the correct answer.
Which option runs counter to the classical theory of criminology?
O A Punishments should be certain.
O B. People want to minimize pain and maximize pleasure.
OC. Punishment encourages criminals.
OD. Punishment should be swift.
Answer:
Punishment encourages criminals.
Explanation:
Punishment, in the framework of criminology, operates under the premise that "People want to minimize pain and maximize pleasure," and will not commit crimes as this will provide displeasure through the legal system. Negative incentives are supposed to reduce crime committed, not encourage it.
which of the following does NOT accurately describe the United States’ system of government?
a. it is a presidential system
b. it is a unitary system
c. it is a republic
d. it is a representative democracy
Answer:
Explanation:
B. Because it not always runner under the best circumstances
2.Discuss 6 reasons why banks fail in Ghana and proffer solutions to redeem the banking sector from these 6 cancerous roots in your opinion.
Bank failures in Ghana are fueled by a lack of efficient management, poor credit management, undercapitalization, lack of corporate governance, regulatory problems at the Central Bank, ill-established loans, and inefficient licensing process.
Due to these problems, the country's banks fail to establish an efficient corporate sector and are always on the brink of collapse.
Some solutions that can be taken are:
Banks must initiate a strict regulatory system that constantly oversees banking activities.Strengthen the licensing process, making these licenses more comprehensive and with greater freedom, which will allow agreements to be established more efficiently.finalize the undercapitalization based on the management of financial resources from the Central Bank, which should provide resources for promising banking projects.Strengthen credit management through the optimization of professionals and greater inspection of credit risk practices.Provide loans to borrowers who can pay them back.With this, we can say that a major reform in the banking sector in Ghana will be necessary so that the problems in this sector are ended.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/25143755
If the buyer backs out of the contract without a good reason, the offer to purchase contains a printed clause that says the seller may keep the deposit as?
If the buyer backs out of the contract without a good reason, the offer to purchase contains a printed clause that says the seller may keep the deposit as liquidate damage.
What is liquidated damage?Several types of real damages include liquidated damages. The phrase "liquidated damages" appears in contracts the most frequently, and it frequently serves as the title of a whole clause or section. When it is difficult or impossible to demonstrate actual damages, even though they are real, the parties to a contract utilize liquidated damages.
An illustration of liquidated damages would be a contractor that didn't finish a project on time and was charged everyday until it was finished.
Thus, liquidate damage.
For more information about liquidate damage, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28498187
#SPJ9
What is infanticide
Infanticide, the killing of the newborn. It has often been interpreted as a primitive method of birth control and a means of ridding a group of its weak and deformed children; but most societies actively desire children and put them to death (or allow them to die) only under exceptional circumstances.\
Have a nice day ✨URGENT 40 POINTS
The state prosecutor has decided to dismiss a case for lack of sufficient evidence. She was not able to get witnesses to participate in the proceedings. That, combined with lack of physical proof, meant she couldn’t prove the suspect was guilty in court. Which case label would be added to the file?
A.
Case in pretrial motion
B.
Case defaulted
C.
Case dismissed
D.
Case plea-bargained
Your client conveys to you that he has received a court order, however, he is not satisfied with the outcome and indicates that he has heard that the judge knows the other party on a personal level as they are house friends. Advise your client regarding the possible options he has to address this situation and confirm the correct procedure to be followed.
Answer:
okay so took me some research but according to uscourts.gov i found a pdf that they had about court ruling and the "rules court judiciaries have to follow and according to Vol. 2/Part A:ethics and judicial conduct/codes of conduct chapter 2/canon 3 it states that "A Judge Should Perform the Duties of the Office Fairly, Impartially and Diligently
hope this helps xx please give brainliest
example of institutional model
Answer:
I believe the answer would be every society have mainly five Social institutions such as family,government,religion,education, economics.
574 views
Explanation:
the main thrust of the quasi contract is to:
The main thrust of quasi contract, also known as a contract implied in law or a constructive contract, is to prevent unjust enrichment.
Quasi contracts are legal constructs used when there is no formal or express agreement between parties, but there is a need to prevent one party from benefiting unfairly at the expense of another.
In situations where one party receives a benefit from another party, and it would be unjust for the benefiting party to retain that benefit without compensating the other party, a quasi contract may be imposed by the court. It is a legal fiction that treats the situation as if there was a contract in place, even though there was no actual agreement.
The purpose of quasi contracts is to ensure fairness and prevent one party from profiting at the expense of another when there is no valid contract governing their relationship. By imposing the obligation to compensate for the benefit received, the quasi contract aims to restore a sense of equity and prevent unjust enrichment.
To know more about quasi contract, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30811453#
#SPJ11
How does the exchange rate for a country's currency affect its terms of
trade?
A. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to more
favorable terms of trade,
B. Favorable terms of trade are required for a country to trade wh
wealthy partners
C. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to
deteriorating terms of trade,
D. Deteriorating terms of trade prevent a country from using its
currency for trade,
Answer:
A. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to more
favorable terms of trade
Explanation:
Just got it right!
The exchange rate of a nation's currency affects the trading terms in such a way that the greater exchange rate leads to favorable trade between countries.
Option A is the correct answer.
What is meant by trading?Trading is the acquisition or disposal of goods or services by the countries with the outside countries.
The exchange rate is the rate that is used to convert the value of one currency into the value of the foreign currency. If the rate is higher, then the trading between the countries is more favorable whereas the trading becomes unfavorable if the rate is lower.
Therefore, the higher rate of exchange provides favorable trade which considers one of the effects of the exchange rate over trade.
Learn more about the exchange rate in the related link:
https://brainly.com/question/13717814
#SPJ2
true/False : reformation is an equitable remedy that allows a court to rewrite a contract to suit itself.
The given statement "reformation is an equitable remedy that allows a court to rewrite a contract to suit itself." is false because reformation is an equitable remedy that allows a court to correct mistakes in a contract to accurately reflect the intent of the parties.
It does not allow the court to rewrite the contract to suit itself. The purpose of reformation is to avoid unjust results that may arise from a mistake in a contract. For example, if there was a mutual mistake in a contract that resulted in a higher price being agreed upon than was intended, the court may order reformation to correct the mistake and reflect the intended price. Ultimately, the court's goal in reformation is to enforce the parties' original agreement, not to create a new one.
For more about reformation:
https://brainly.com/question/8120883
#SPJ11
3 ways political parties help citizens
Answer:
1) The select candidates, set goals, and provide leadership.
2) The give citizens a voice in our government, they inform citizens
3) They involve citizens regularly
Explanation:
Hope this helps you as much as intended.
What is the 2020 standard deduction for a 50-year-old married couple filing jointly, neither of whom is blind?
Answer:
The answer is your mom i think
Explanation:
right?
Each of the following correctly describes individual income taxes Except? a tax returns must be filed only by those who are self employed b tax collection is based on a pay-as-you-earn system c The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is responsible for collecting income taxes
Each of the following correctly describes individual income taxes Except- tax returns must be filed only by those who are self employed. Even if you are not required to file taxes, you may wish to do so in order to qualify for tax credits as well as other benefits.
The need to file income taxes is determined by four factors: your earnings, filing condition, age, and whether you have a special circumstance. Even if you are not required to file taxes, you may wish to do so in order to qualify for tax credits as well as other benefits. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is the revenue service for the federal government of the United States that is in charge of collecting federal taxes. Pay as you earn (PAYE) is a repayment or withholding scheme that makes deductions incrementally as paychecks are received. Employees who choose automatic withholding view pre-payments made to governmental and/or state tax authority with each paycheck.
Learn more on income taxes -
https://brainly.com/question/17075354
#SPJ4
Of the proposed methods for responding to an unruly defendant in Illinois v. Allen, which did the Supreme Court state should be used as a last resort for fear of prejudicing the jury against the defendant?
Answer:
Gag and bind defendants
Explanation:
In the Illinois v. Allen case of 1970, the Supreme court upheld the gag or bind order which allows for the removal of an unruly defendant who interrupts court proceedings. In that particular case, Allen was tried for ordering a drink in a bar, refusing to pay, and collecting $200 at gunpoint from a bartender. When he was charged to court, Allen refused the public defender whom the court assigned to him, rather insisting that he would defend himself. He proved verbally abusive to the judge even issuing him a death threat when he tried convincing him of the need for a public defender who understands the language of the court. When the situation proved uncontrollable, the judge ordered that Allen be taken out of the court and only brought in when there was a need for him to be identified.
The Supreme court upheld this decision agreeing that any defendant whose actions proved disruptive to the court should be removed from the courtroom. Gag and shackles were one of the three methods proposed for controlling an unruly defendant and it was to be the last resort. The reason for this is that when the judges see the defendant in that condition it could play on their emotions, thus making them prejudiced.
What are some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities?
Some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities include the Jewish community during the Holocaust, Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps, and Indigenous peoples throughout colonization.
- The Jewish community during the Holocaust: During World War II, Jewish people were targeted by the Nazis and subjected to systematic genocide, forced labor, and mass extermination in concentration camps.
- Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps: Following the attack on Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans were unjustly perceived as a threat to national security and forcibly relocated to internment camps, where they faced harsh conditions and loss of personal freedom.
- Indigenous peoples throughout colonization: Indigenous communities around the world have faced marginalization, dispossession of land, cultural suppression, and discrimination due to colonial expansion and policies implemented by colonizing powers.
These examples demonstrate the experiences of discrete and insular minorities who have endured discrimination, persecution, and marginalization based on their ethnicity, religion, or cultural background. It is important to acknowledge these historical injustices to promote understanding, empathy, and the protection of human rights for all individuals, regardless of their minority status.
For more such questions on colonization, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/27868020
#SPJ8
Information taken from existing classified source and generated into another form or medium, such as a video, DVD, or CD is an example
Answer: generating
Explanation:
From the question, we should note that the information that is taken from the existing classified source and generated into another form, such as video, DVD, or a CD is referred to as an example of generating.
It should be noted that "generating" is quite different from "extracting" which has to do with the information that are taken directly from a classified source that's already existing in a new document.
Are indigent criminal defendants in Luzerne County receiving their constitutionally protected right to counsel?
The states Luzerne and localities use a variety of strategies, including public defender programs, assigned counsel, and contract attorney systems, to the provide indigent defense services.
If it is determined that you lack the financial means to hire an attorney, a public defense will be assigned on your behalf. For contempt, Luzerne, and revocation cases, eligibility is taken as given. If you appear to have the financial means to hire your own attorney, the public defender may decline to represent you. The indigent defendants frequently have to spend a lot of time waiting in the jail before speaking with a lawyer.
To learn more about defense, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/12252825
#SPJ1
Where did the idea for the 6th amendment of the constitution come from?
Answer:
The Sixth Amendment was part of the Bill of Rights that was added to the Constitution on December 15, 1791. This amendment provides a number of rights people have when they have been accused of a crime
Explanation:
Answer:
The Bill of Rights became law on December 15, 1791. The 6th Amendment focuses completely on the rights of a person accused of committing a crime by the government. ... They were very familiar with a long list of government abuses from English history in which people were accused of things and punished unfairly.
Richard Winthrop is accused of murdering his wife by pushing her down the stairs and then cracking her skull open with a weapon that has never been found. The defense maintains that Mrs. Winthrop tripped on her way down the stairs because she had been drinking, and cracked her skull as she fell. Dr. Winthrop has a thriving practice in the community, and by most accounts he had a happy marriage. There is no indication that Dr. Winthrop needed the money from his wife's life insurance policy. While awaiting trial, he has been released on his own recognizance.
Dr. Winthrop's first murder trial ended in a hung jury. You are the head prosecutor for the state. You have called your team of assistants together to discuss the option of retrying Winthrop for murdering his wife.
You tell your team that no new evidence has been found, but you are still certain that Winthrop murdered his wife. You wonder if a different jury might find him guilty, and discuss cases where, in a first trial, the offender was not convicted due to a hung jury, but was convicted in a second trial. You and your team agree that justice has not been served. You decide to retry Winthrop.
You tell your team that no new evidence has been found, but you are still certain that Winthrop murdered his wife. You know the risks involved with a new trial. There is no guarantee that a second jury will find Winthrop guilty. You also discuss the fact that a second, high-profile trial will tax the county financially. The third issue you discuss is the fact that you are up for reelection. You know that the media and some members of the public will claim that conducting this second trial means you will benefit from more press time than your opponent. After a lengthy discussion, the team reluctantly agrees that Dr. Winthrop got away with murder. You will not retry him.
Given that the murder weapon has never been found, the evidence is weaker than you might think. However, you think that the testimony of the coroner will be sufficient to support the murder charge.
If the jury learns that Dr. Winthrop started dating one of his nurses within a month of his wife's death, they might be more likely to convict. You realize you have the choice of a request deal yet you are sure Winthrop is blameworthy. You decide to take a chance and seek a conviction for first-degree murder. Given that the murder weapon has never been found, the evidence is weaker than you might think.
In any case, you accept that the coroner's declaration will give adequate proof to help the murdercharge. When the jury learns that Dr. Winthrop began dating one of his nurses within a month of his wife's death, you hope they will convict. However, you must acknowledge that you have been unable to connect Mrs. Winthrop's death to Dr. Winthrop's dating outside of an unproven rumor
To learn about jury
https://brainly.com/question/29553753
#SPJ4
One kind of evidence
why is it important to be ethical in your studies
Under the 12th amendment, if no candidate receives a majority of electoral votes for president, _____.
The three candidates that garner most electoral college votes are chosen as president by the House and Senate if no candidate obtains a majority of those votes. Each delegate from a state gets one vote.
What does the word "Amendment" mean?The provisions of a contract and perhaps other instrument may be amended or supplemented. An amendment is a new addition or change that largely maintains the integrity of the original document. Other times, a modification completely delete the old content and replace it with fresh wording.
In layman's words, whatever is the First Amendment?Initial Amendment Explained. No law establishing a religion, forbidding its free practice, or restricting the right to free expression or the press may be passed by Congress.
To know more about Amendment visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ4
which of the following most likely would not be required to complete continuing education hours in this state?
Insurance brokers most likely would not be required to complete continuing education hours in this state.
The word "insurance broker" became a regulated term under the Insurance Brokers (Registration) Act 1977, which was intended to prohibit enterprises claiming to be brokers but really working as agents for one or more preferred insurance companies.
Following the repeal of the 1977 Act, the word has no legal definition. From 14 January 2005 until 31 March 2013, the sale of general insurance was regulated by the Financial Services Authority, and from 1 April 2013, it has been regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Anyone or any business that has been authorized by the Authority can now call themselves an insurance broker.
The question is incomplete, complete question "Which of the following would most likely NOT be required to complete continuing education hours in this state?
A. insurance brokers
B. resident producers
C. insurance consultants
D. nonresident producers"
Learn more about insurance broker
brainly.com/question/14956153
#SPJ4
In which of these states is it illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop, NEW YORK, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, PENNSYLVANIA?
Answer:
Illinois is the state where it is illegal to do this.
Among the given options, it is not explicitly illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop in any of the states: New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Pennsylvania.
It's important to note that specific laws and regulations can vary within each state, and there might be local ordinances or specific circumstances where falling asleep in a cheese shop could potentially be considered a violation.
However, as a general statement, there are no known laws in these states that explicitly prohibit falling asleep in a cheese shop. It's always advisable to be respectful of the rules and policies of any establishment and to inquire about any specific guidelines regarding sleeping or resting on the premises.
Learn more about cheese shop here:
https://brainly.com/question/22734191
#SPJ2
Dr .Henry lee testimony o.j simpson
Answer:
itz a case...
Explanation:
Renowned forensic scientist Henry Lee said Thursday that the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial in 1995 not only revealed the racial chasm in America but the importance of strictly following established protocols in processing crime scenes.
“There were so many issues with the major crime scene in that case,” said Mr. Lee, who holds a doctorate and who testified for five days as a defense expert for Simpson. “This case set the landmarks for crime scene and laboratory handling of evidence.’
Mr. Lee’s comments came on the first day of the two-day inaugural conference “Pioneers of Forensic Science,” at which he is the first honoree. One of the world’s foremost criminalists, Mr. Lee has been involved in the Laci Peterson, JonBenet Ramsey, Caylee Anthony and Vince Foster cases, among many others.
Mr. Lee, Connecticut’s chief emeritus of scientific services, has served as that state’s commissioner of public safety, forensic science laboratory director and chief criminalist. He is the founder of the University of New Haven’s Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science and is the namesake of its Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences.
He spoke on a panel “People v. O.J. Simpson: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective on the Case that Brought Forensic Science to the World.”
Other panelists included F. Lee Bailey, a member of Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys; Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner for New York City who also was a Simpson defense expert; and Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Pittsburgh’s renowned forensic pathologist who was an expert commentator on the Simpson case on national television programs. He also is the namesake of Duquesne University’s Cyril H. Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, the conference sponsor. University President Kenneth G. Gormley, who holds law degree, moderated the two-hour panel discussion.
A native of China, Mr. Lee said he had no idea who Mr. Simpson was when he was asked to be an expert for him at trial. He reconstructed the crime scene and examined every piece of evidence collected.
“I knew there was something wrong with the case by the physical evidence. There were lots of problems.”
He discovered that notes taken by Los Angeles Police Department criminalists at the scene were later substituted with other documents. “We found this out because the notes are stapled, but we found extra staple holes,” meaning they had been re-stapled.
Mr. Lee recounted his testimony about a crucial piece of the prosecution’s evidence—a bloodstain found on the walkway outside the Bundy Drive home where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were killed in June 1994.
DNA tests indicated O.J. Simpson was the likely source of the blood, but Mr. Lee testified he was suspicious because he discovered four small patches of blood on the paper packet wrapped around the Bundy evidence. That would indicate the blood swatches were wet and leaked onto the paper, yet LAPD technicians had testified that they left the swatches to dry overnight.
Asked by defense attorney Barry Scheck to account for the stains, Mr. Lee famously answered, “The only explanation I can give under these circumstances is, something’s wrong.”
As a scientist, Mr. Lee wouldn’t speculate either at the trial or at Thursday’s conference about how that could have occurred, but Mr. Bailey isn’t a scientist, so he wasn’t so circumspect. That evidence and the infamous glove and the bloody sock and anything else indicating Simpson’s guilt was planted, he said.
what are the importance of justinian’s political, social, and architectural achievements. explain what his achievements were in each area, and provide examples of each.
Political achievements of Justinian made important legislative reforms, Social achievements of Justinian was an influential figure in the areas of education and religion, Architectural achievements of Justinian's greatest architectural achievement was the construction of the Hagia Sophia
Justinian I, also known as Justinian the Great, was one of the most significant emperors of the Byzantine Empire. Justinian's political, social, and architectural achievements were significant for several reasons.
Political achievements of Justinian:
Justinian made important legislative reforms, such as the Codex Justinianus, which consolidated Roman law. Justinian's legal system, which became the foundation of modern Western law, emphasized the principle of justice.
Justinian's political achievements also include his ability to strengthen the power of the imperial office. He also created the Corpus Juris Civilis, a compilation of Roman laws, which helped to unify the empire and maintain the rule of law throughout the Byzantine Empire.
Social achievements of Justinian:
Justinian was an influential figure in the areas of education and religion. He established schools and universities, as well as promoted scholarship and scientific study.
His most significant social achievement was probably the construction of the Hagia Sophia, which became one of the most important religious buildings in the world. It was completed in just five years and is still standing today.
Architectural achievements of Justinian: Justinian's greatest architectural achievement was the construction of the Hagia Sophia, which is still standing today. It was a massive dome structure that had a profound impact on the field of architecture.
It was one of the most impressive structures of its time, and its design was copied throughout the world. In addition to the Hagia Sophia, Justinian constructed other significant structures, such as aqueducts and roads, which helped to improve the infrastructure of the Byzantine Empire.
Learn more about Justinian the Great: brainly.com/question/29545865
#SPJ11
Justinian’s political, social, and architectural achievements are significant in the history of the Byzantine Empire.
The importance of Justinian’s political, social, and architectural achievements are:
Political Achievements: Justinian’s reign was marked by extensive political reforms. Justinian is considered to be one of the most significant Byzantine emperors in terms of his political achievements. Some of the important political achievements of Justinian are: He was successful in recapturing the western part of the Roman Empire which was lost to the barbarians. Justinian established the Code of Justinian, which was a comprehensive legal code that reformed and simplified Roman laws. Justinian centralized the administration of the empire and created new administrative offices to manage the empire. Justinian introduced new taxes that helped the empire to finance its military campaigns.Social Achievements: Justinian was also instrumental in bringing about significant social reforms during his reign. Some of his social achievements are: Justinian extended the rights of women in the empire. He allowed women to own property, file for divorce, and inherit property. Justinian also extended the rights of slaves in the empire. He introduced laws that prohibited the mistreatment of slaves and allowed them to file complaints against their owners.Architectural Achievements: Justinian was a great patron of architecture and was responsible for some of the most impressive buildings of the Byzantine Empire. Some of his architectural achievements are: He commissioned the construction of the Hagia Sophia, which is considered to be one of the most significant buildings of the Byzantine Empire. Justinian also commissioned the construction of several other churches and monuments such as the Basilica of San Vitale in Ravenna, Italy, and the Church of the Holy Apostles in Constantinople. Justinian’s architectural achievements helped to establish Byzantine architecture as a significant style in world architecture.To know more about Justinian, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2427101
#SPJ11
Should it be more difficult or easier to impeach public officials and why
Answer:
it indeed should be harder.
Explanation:
So every people can be sure who they need to choose and vote